Kerberos Authorization Data Container Authenticated by Multiple Message Authentication Codes (MACs)
draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-04
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2016-03-03
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2016-01-22
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR |
2016-01-21
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2016-01-14
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT |
2015-12-22
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2015-12-21
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
2015-12-21
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from No IC |
2015-12-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent |
2015-12-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2015-12-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2015-12-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2015-12-17
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
2015-12-17
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2015-12-17
|
04 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2015-12-17
|
04 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2015-12-17
|
04 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2015-12-16
|
04 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2015-12-16
|
04 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2015-12-16
|
04 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2015-12-16
|
04 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2015-12-15
|
04 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2015-12-15
|
04 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2015-12-14
|
04 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2015-12-13
|
04 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2015-12-11
|
04 | Meral Shirazipour | Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready with Nits. Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour. |
2015-12-10
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead |
2015-12-10
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot has been issued |
2015-12-10
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2015-12-10
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | Created "Approve" ballot |
2015-12-10
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot writeup was changed |
2015-12-10
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot writeup was changed |
2015-12-04
|
04 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call |
2015-11-30
|
04 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed |
2015-11-30
|
04 | Sabrina Tanamal | (Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-04.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this … (Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-04.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions. While it's often helpful for a document's IANA Considerations section to remain in place upon publication even if there are no actions, if the authors strongly prefer to remove it, IANA does not object. If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible. |
2015-11-24
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | Telechat date has been changed to 2015-12-17 from 2015-01-08 |
2015-11-23
|
04 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour |
2015-11-23
|
04 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour |
2015-11-20
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" CC: kitten@ietf.org, kitten-chairs@ietf.org, kaduk@mit.edu, draft-ietf-kitten-cammac@ietf.org, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" CC: kitten@ietf.org, kitten-chairs@ietf.org, kaduk@mit.edu, draft-ietf-kitten-cammac@ietf.org, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Kerberos Authorization Data Container Authenticated by Multiple MACs) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the Common Authentication Technology Next Generation WG (kitten) to consider the following document: - 'Kerberos Authorization Data Container Authenticated by Multiple MACs' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-12-04. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document specifies a Kerberos Authorization Data container that supersedes AD-KDC-ISSUED. It allows for multiple Message Authentication Codes (MACs) or signatures to authenticate the contained Authorization Data elements. The multiple MACs are needed to mitigate shortcomings in the existing AD-KDC-ISSUED container. This document updates RFC 4120. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-cammac/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-cammac/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. This is a second last call for this document - an error was discovered when this was in the RFC editor queue, it was taken back to the WG and is now ready to jump all the hoops again. |
2015-11-20
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2015-11-20
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | Last call was requested |
2015-11-20
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation |
2015-11-20
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | Last call announcement was changed |
2015-11-20
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | Last call announcement was generated |
2015-11-20
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from RFC Ed Queue |
2015-11-18
|
04 | Benjamin Kaduk | 1. Summary The document shepherd is Benjamin Kaduk. The responsible Area Director is Stephen Farrell. This document provides a new authorization data container for Kerberos, … 1. Summary The document shepherd is Benjamin Kaduk. The responsible Area Director is Stephen Farrell. This document provides a new authorization data container for Kerberos, with functionality extending that of the existing AD-KDC-ISSUED container. The new functionality allows a KDC to be able to validate that a ticket being presented to the KDC contains authorization data issued by a KDC (in the same realm), whereas AD-KDC-ISSUED only allows for the Kerberos application service to perform that validation. Since this is an update to the standards-track RFC 4120, it must also be a standards-track document. 2. Review and Consensus The review process for this document was quite spread out in time, with action occurring in occasional bursts. Almost all of the Kerberos experts who regularly participate in the WG have contributed to reviewing this document at some point in its history, but not necessarily all at the same time. There was a lot of discussion around the time of the initial few revisions, but then a lull in activity. Version -05 got a lot of review comments, which resulted in some (substantive, but relatively minor) changes to the specification. It was unclear what level of review those changes had received, after essentially no comments were received during a WGLC period for the -08 (of the document with krb-wg in the document name), so we solicited further comments at that time, and got thorough review from two Kerberos experts, which the shepherd believes is sufficient. These post-WGLC reviews were largely editorial, but there were four issues of substance that were raised, two of which received heavy discussion. Discussion of the implicit criticality of authorization data in Kerberos resulted in full consensus for the text in section 5. The WG may choose to revisit the usage of critical authorization data in Kerberos in future work, but that question does not need to be resolved for this document to move forward. Discussion of the binding of the CAMMAC to the ticket service principal name resulted in full consensus for the text in the last paragraph of section 8. The desire for a consumer of the CAMMAC to exist or an IANA registry for authorization types to exist prior to publication of this document did not receive much discussion, but seems to be at least partially resolved by the existence of draft-jain-kitten-krb-auth-indicator, which came out after the concern was raised. Discussions in person at IETF 91 indicate that at least one participant wishes for publication of this document to block on the creation of a IANA registries for ad-types and key usage numbers, but the shepherd believes that the existing (non-IANA) registries are sufficient. This document had progressed to the RFC Editor's queue when an implementor noted an issue with the security considerations text, that forbid certain use cases involving propagating a CAMMAC from a cross-realm TGT into a ticket issued by a KDC in a different realm. The document was called back from the RFC Editor for revision, and another WGLC was held, for draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-03, which passed without incident. The changes since the previous WGLC are contained solely to the security considerations and an author update. Red Hat and MIT have collaborated to produce an implementation, including some automated test cases using the CAMMAC. 3. Intellectual Property Each author has confirmed conformance with BCP 78/79. There are no IPR declarations against this document. 4. Other Points This document makes no request of IANA. It allocates numbers in the Kerberos authorization data types registry and the Kerberos key usage registry, which are currently managed independently of IANA (see also draft-ietf-kitten-kerberos-iana-registries). As mentioned above, the shepherd does not believe that publication of this document must wait for these registries to be transferred into IANA's control. The current registrar for these Kerberos registries is a coauthor of the document and assigned the numbers listed in it. 'idnits' has a few false positives: though this document Updates RFC 4120, it does not contain any content copied from RFC 4120 (all content is new in this document), so no disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work is needed. Additionally, the checker notes for various ASN.1 tags, "Looks like a reference, but probably isn't". We are in the "probably" case, here. |
2015-11-01
|
04 | Taylor Yu | New version available: draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-04.txt |
2015-10-14
|
03 | (System) | Notify list changed from kitten-chairs@ietf.org, kaduk@mit.edu to (None) |
2015-06-25
|
03 | Taylor Yu | New version available: draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-03.txt |
2015-03-09
|
02 | Taylor Yu | New version available: draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-02.txt |
2015-02-12
|
01 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to IESG from RFC-EDITOR |
2015-01-29
|
01 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT |
2015-01-19
|
01 | Meral Shirazipour | Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready with Nits. Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour. |
2015-01-15
|
01 | Tero Kivinen | Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'No Response' |
2015-01-13
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2015-01-13
|
01 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2015-01-13
|
01 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2015-01-12
|
01 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC |
2015-01-12
|
01 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup |
2015-01-12
|
01 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2015-01-12
|
01 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2015-01-12
|
01 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2015-01-12
|
01 | Amy Vezza | Ballot writeup was changed |
2015-01-08
|
01 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
2015-01-08
|
01 | Taylor Yu | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
2015-01-08
|
01 | Taylor Yu | New version available: draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-01.txt |
2015-01-08
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation |
2015-01-07
|
00 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2015-01-07
|
00 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon |
2015-01-07
|
00 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
2015-01-07
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2015-01-07
|
00 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2015-01-07
|
00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2015-01-07
|
00 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2015-01-07
|
00 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2015-01-06
|
00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2015-01-05
|
00 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2015-01-05
|
00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot comment] I agree with Barry's suggested changes. |
2015-01-05
|
00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2015-01-03
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Notification list changed to kitten@ietf.org, kitten-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-kitten-cammac.all@tools.ietf.org, kaduk@mit.edu from "Benjamin Kaduk" <kaduk@mit.edu>, kitten-chairs@tools.ietf.org |
2015-01-03
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Notification list changed to "Benjamin Kaduk" <kaduk@mit.edu>, kitten-chairs@tools.ietf.org from "Benjamin Kaduk" <kaduk@mit.edu> |
2015-01-03
|
00 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot comment] Thanks for your work on this draft. I'd like to see the update Barry requested be added per Ben's response to his comment. |
2015-01-03
|
00 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2014-12-29
|
00 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour |
2014-12-29
|
00 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour |
2014-12-29
|
00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2014-12-19
|
00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot comment] I'd be happier if this document made it clear what, exactly, is being updated in RFC 4120. I gather it's Section 6 … [Ballot comment] I'd be happier if this document made it clear what, exactly, is being updated in RFC 4120. I gather it's Section 6 of this document that's making the update, assigning an Authorization Data Types value (4120, Section 7.5.4) and a Key Usage Number (4120, Section 7.5.1). Is that correct? Might you change Section 6 to explicitly say that, and refer to the sections in 4120 that are being updated? |
2014-12-19
|
00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2014-12-18
|
00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2014-12-12
|
00 | Meral Shirazipour | Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready with Nits. Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour. |
2014-12-10
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2015-01-08 |
2014-12-10
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup |
2014-12-10
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot has been issued |
2014-12-10
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2014-12-10
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Created "Approve" ballot |
2014-12-10
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot writeup was changed |
2014-12-09
|
00 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call |
2014-12-04
|
00 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Qin Wu. |
2014-12-01
|
00 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Qin Wu |
2014-12-01
|
00 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Qin Wu |
2014-11-28
|
00 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour |
2014-11-28
|
00 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour |
2014-11-27
|
00 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to David Waltermire |
2014-11-27
|
00 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to David Waltermire |
2014-11-26
|
00 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
2014-11-26
|
00 | Amanda Baber | IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-00, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this document doesn't require … IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-00, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions. While it is helpful for the IANA Considerations section of the document to remain in place upon publication, if the authors prefer to remove it, IANA doesn't object. If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible. |
2014-11-25
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2014-11-25
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Kerberos Authorization Data Container Authenticated … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Kerberos Authorization Data Container Authenticated by Multiple MACs) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the Common Authentication Technology Next Generation WG (kitten) to consider the following document: - 'Kerberos Authorization Data Container Authenticated by Multiple MACs' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-12-09. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract Abstract: This document specifies a Kerberos Authorization Data container that supersedes AD-KDC-ISSUED. It allows for multiple Message Authentication Codes (MACs) or signatures to authenticate the contained Authorization Data elements. This document updates RFC 4120. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-cammac/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-cammac/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2014-11-25
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2014-11-25
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Last call announcement was changed |
2014-11-24
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Last call was requested |
2014-11-24
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot approval text was generated |
2014-11-24
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot writeup was generated |
2014-11-24
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation |
2014-11-24
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Last call announcement was generated |
2014-11-24
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested |
2014-11-17
|
00 | Benjamin Kaduk | 1. Summary The document shepherd is Benjamin Kaduk. The responsible Area Director is Stephen Farrell. This document provides a new authorization data container for Kerberos, … 1. Summary The document shepherd is Benjamin Kaduk. The responsible Area Director is Stephen Farrell. This document provides a new authorization data container for Kerberos, with functionality extending that of the existing AD-KDC-ISSUED container. The new functionality allows a KDC to be able to validate that a ticket being presented to the KDC contains authorization data issued by a KDC (in the same realm), whereas AD-KDC-ISSUED only allows for the Kerberos application service to perform that validation. Since this is an update to the standards-track RFC 4120, it must also be a standards-track document. 2. Review and Consensus The review process for this document was quite spread out in time, with action occurring in occasional bursts. Almost all of the Kerberos experts who regularly participate in the WG have contributed to reviewing this document at some point in its history, but not necessarily all at the same time. There was a lot of discussion around the time of the initial few revisions, but then a lull in activity. Version -05 got a lot of review comments, which resulted in some (substantive, but relatively minor) changes to the specification. It was unclear what level of review those changes had received, after essentially no comments were received during a WGLC period for the -08, so we solicited further comments at that time, and got thorough review from two Kerberos experts, which the shepherd believes is sufficient. These post-WGLC reviews were largely editorial, but there were four issues of substance that were raised, two of which received heavy discussion. Discussion of the implicit criticality of authorization data in Kerberos resulted in full consensus for the text in section 5. The WG may choose to revisit the usage of critical authorization data in Kerberos in future work, but that question does not need to be resolved for this document to move forward. Discussion of the binding of the CAMMAC to the ticket service principal name resulted in full consensus for the text in the last paragraph of section 8. The desire for a consumer of the CAMMAC to exist or an IANA registry for authorization types to exist prior to publication of this document did not receive much discussion, but seems to be at least partially resolved by the existence of draft-jain-kitten-krb-auth-indicator, which came out after the concern was raised. Discussions in person at IETF 91 indicate that at least one participant wishes for publication of this document to block on the creation of a IANA registries for ad-types and key usage numbers, but the shepherd believes that the existing (non-IANA) registries are sufficient. The ASN.1 type specification for AD-CAMMAC was incomplete, missing IMPORTS statements and a module header with OID; this addition is believed to be uncontroversial. There are not currently any implementations, but Red Hat and MIT plan to collaborate to produce an implementation. MIT has a partial implementation of an en/decoder for the ASN.1 types. 3. Intellectual Property Each author has confirmed conformance with BCP 78/79. There are no IPR declarations against this document. 4. Other Points This document makes no request of IANA. It allocates numbers in the Kerberos authorization data types registry and the Kerberos key usage registry, which are currently managed independently of IANA (see also draft-ietf-kitten-kerberos-iana-registries). As mentioned above, the shepherd does not believe that publication of this document must wait for these registries to be transferred into IANA's control. The current registrar for these Kerberos registries is a coauthor of the document and assigned the numbers listed in it. 'idnits' has a few false positives: though this document Updates RFC 4120, it does not contain any content copied from RFC 4120 (all content is new in this document), so no disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work is needed. Additionally, the checker notes for various ASN.1 tags, "Looks like a reference, but probably isn't". We are in the "probably" case, here. |
2014-11-17
|
00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Responsible AD changed to Stephen Farrell |
2014-11-17
|
00 | Benjamin Kaduk | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document |
2014-11-17
|
00 | Benjamin Kaduk | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2014-11-17
|
00 | Benjamin Kaduk | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2014-11-17
|
00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Changed document writeup |
2014-11-17
|
00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Notification list changed to "Benjamin Kaduk" <kaduk@mit.edu> |
2014-11-17
|
00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Document shepherd changed to Benjamin Kaduk |
2014-11-17
|
00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None |
2014-11-12
|
00 | Taylor Yu | New version available: draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-00.txt |