Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings
draft-ietf-mext-binary-ts-05
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
No Record
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-03-10)
Unknown
Section 3.1
The alignment requirement for this sub-option is:
4n if A, B, C, D, E, or F is set
2n if G, H, I, or J is set
n if K, L, M, N is set
Is there a missing "or" in the last line?
If J and K are set, is the alignment 2n or n?
What does it mean to have an alignment requirement of 4n?
---
I agree with Cullen that reviewing this before draft-ietf-mext-flow-
binding seems rash. Isn't it possible that review comments on that other
document might require changes of substance here.
I suggest that the responsible AD should hold a Discuss until the other
document is completed.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Record
No Record
(2010-03-09)
Unknown
Seems like a bad idea to approve this before IESG has even looked at draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding