Overview of Pre-Congestion Notification Encoding
draft-ietf-pcn-encoding-comparison-09
Yes
(David Harrington)
No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
David Harrington Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-19)
Unknown
Thank you for addressing my Discuss issues and Comments. Note that the revised text in Section 5 (for which, thanks) is missing blank lines between the paragraphs.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-01)
Unknown
The Gen-ART Review by Pete McCann on 28-Feb-2012 included some editorial suggestions that deserve consideration (1) Section 3.3.3.3 says: > > ... full-functionality option in Section 3.3.2.2. > I think you meant "Section 3.3.3.2". One other place in this paragraph needs this correction too. (2) Section 4.2 says: > > The problem with 3-in-1 encoding is that the 10-codepoint does > not survive decapsulation with the tunneling options in > Section 3.3.2.1 - 3.3.2.3. > Again, you meant 3.3.3.1 - 3.3.3.3
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown