Skip to main content

IANA Registries for the Remote Direct Data Placement (RDDP) Protocols
draft-ietf-storm-rddp-registries-02

Yes

(Adrian Farrel)
(David Harrington)
(Ron Bonica)

No Objection

(Dan Romascanu)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
David Harrington Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss) Yes
Yes (2012-01-04) Unknown
I agree with Pete that the RFC 2119 language is in general unnecessary.

In some of the registries, providing an experimental value for testing and development purposes would be useful, IMHO. Look at RFC 5872 Sections 2.1 and 3 for an example and RFC 3692 for general guidance. For instance, I would reserve one RDMAP operation code value (0xF) as an experimental value. And 0xFFFF for SCTP Function Codes for DDP Session Control. But whether you want to make such a reservation depends of course entirely on your understanding of the needs of the RDDP community and how the protocols might evolve.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-01-03) Unknown
I think the 2119 language is unnecessary and ought to be removed. Some of it belongs with the protocol that defines the field. Some of it is giving instructions to IANA about their processing, which seems an inappropriate use of 2119.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown