datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.9.0, 2014-12-18
Report a bug

464XLAT: Combination of Stateful and Stateless Translation
draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-10

Diffs

Document history

DateVersionByText
2013-04-02 RFC (System) RFC published
2013-04-02 10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-03-06 10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2013-02-27 10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2013-02-25 10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT from AUTH
2013-02-23 10 Masanobu Kawashima New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-10.txt (diff from previous)
2013-02-15 09 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH from EDIT
2013-02-14 09 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT from IESG
2013-02-14 09 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup was changed
2013-02-14 09 Ron Bonica Intended Status changed to Informational from Best Current Practice
2013-02-01 09 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-01-30 09 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2013-01-30 09 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-01-30 09 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2013-01-30 09 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-01-30 09 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup was changed
2013-01-30 09 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup was changed
2013-01-30 09 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2013-01-30 09 Ron Bonica State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-01-30 09 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ronald Bonica has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2013-01-21 09 Masanobu Kawashima New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-09.txt (diff from previous)
2013-01-10 08 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Updated 1/10.
I support the addition of Barry's suggested text as an introduction to
section 2.  Please confirm that this sentence ...[show all]
2013-01-10 08 Ralph Droms Ballot comment text updated for Ralph Droms
2013-01-10 08 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation
2013-01-10 08 Brian Haberman
[Ballot comment]
I very much agree with Wes' commentary on calling this a Best Current Practice.  Additionally, I am very troubled by the presence of ...[show all]
2013-01-10 08 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to Abstain from No Record
2013-01-10 08 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Updated 1/10.
I support the addition of Barry's suggested text as an introduction to
section 2.  I suggest section 2 be ...[show all]
2013-01-10 08 Ralph Droms Ballot comment text updated for Ralph Droms
2013-01-10 08 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-01-09 08 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
I don't think deploying this type of service is good for Internet users, as it only supports a limited type of application ...[show all]
2013-01-09 08 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2013-01-09 08 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to No Record from No Objection
2013-01-09 08 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
I would also like to see the extra context Barry is suggesting adding.

A question for Fred - (not a request for change) - which ...[show all]
2013-01-09 08 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2013-01-09 08 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
This is a placeholder DISCUSS. The IPR statement troubles me. I will remove this DISCUSS when the chairs clarify the WG's position ...[show all]
2013-01-09 08 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ronald Bonica has been changed to Discuss from Yes
2013-01-09 08 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-01-09 08 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I found this document surprisingly easy to read and understand. Thank
you.

One small point to consider if you are revising the document ...[show all]
2013-01-09 08 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-01-09 08 Benoit Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-01-08 08 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]

I have some comments regarding the readability and presentation of the
specification.  I think the specification is correct as written, and
many network ...[show all]
2013-01-08 08 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2013-01-08 08 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-01-08 08 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- I wondered how this impacts on or work with DNSSEC? Be
nice if you said.

- 8.4: Why doesn't it say that ...[show all]
2013-01-08 08 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-01-07 08 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
A couple of nits in s1 from the secdir review:

"a explanation" should be "an explanation"
"using combination" should be "using a combination ...[show all]
2013-01-07 08 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-01-07 08 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]

  Please consider the comment from the Gen-ART Review by Miguel Garcia
  on 5-Jan-2013:
  >
  > Expand acronyms at first occurrence. This includes:
  > GGSN (used in ...[show all]
2013-01-07 08 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2013-01-04 08 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Record from No Objection
2013-01-04 08 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2013-01-03 08 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-12-27 08 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Thanks, Fred, for the excellent shepherd writeup, which heads off a number of questions.

I'd like to see the document capture some ...[show all]
2012-12-27 08 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-12-21 08 Ron Bonica State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-12-21 08 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-12-18 08 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-08, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA ...[show all]
2012-12-17 08 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-01-10
2012-12-17 08 Ron Bonica Ballot has been issued
2012-12-17 08 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-12-17 08 Ron Bonica Created "Approve" ballot
2012-12-07 08 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>;
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>;
CC: <v6ops@ietf.org>;
Reply-To: ietf ...[show all]
2012-12-07 08 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-12-07 08 Ron Bonica Last call was requested
2012-12-07 08 Ron Bonica Ballot approval text was generated
2012-12-07 08 Ron Bonica State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-12-07 08 Ron Bonica Last call announcement was generated
2012-12-07 08 Ron Bonica Last call announcement was generated
2012-12-07 08 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup was changed
2012-12-07 08 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup was generated
2012-12-06 08 Ron Bonica State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-10-29 08 Cindy Morgan
> (1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC ...[show all]
2012-10-29 08 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Fred Baker (fred@cisco.com) is the document shepherd.'
2012-10-29 08 Cindy Morgan Intended Status changed to Best Current Practice
2012-10-29 08 Cindy Morgan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-10-29 08 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-mawatari-v6ops-464xlat
2012-10-29 08 Fred Baker Annotation tag Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway set.
2012-10-29 08 Fred Baker Changed protocol writeup
2012-10-29 08 Fred Baker IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document
2012-09-20 08 Fred Baker Sending to IESG following closure of WGLC
2012-09-20 08 Fred Baker Changed shepherd to Fred Baker
2012-09-18 08 Masanobu Kawashima New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-08.txt (diff from previous)
2012-08-19 07 Masanobu Kawashima New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-07.txt (diff from previous)
2012-08-06 06 Masanobu Kawashima New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-06.txt (diff from previous)
2012-07-02 05 Masanobu Kawashima New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-05.txt (diff from previous)
2012-06-24 04 Masanobu Kawashima New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-04.txt (diff from previous)
2012-05-07 03 Masanobu Kawashima New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-03.txt (diff from previous)
2012-04-16 02 Masanobu Kawashima New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-02.txt (diff from previous)
2012-03-12 01 Masanobu Kawashima New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-01.txt (diff from previous)
2012-02-14 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-00.txt