URI Scheme for Java(tm) Message Service 1.0
Summary: Needs a YES.
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
( Alexey Melnikov ) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes
( Ron Bonica ) No Objection
( Stewart Bryant ) No Objection
( Gonzalo Camarillo ) No Objection
( Lars Eggert ) No Objection
Comment (2011-01-17 for -)
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 4: > The syntax of this 'jms' URI is not compatible with any known current > vendor implementation, but the expressivity of the format should > permit all vendors to use it. So are there vendor implementations of 'jms' already? If yes, what it the value in publishing a specification that is not compatible with any of them? Or do we have an indication that the vendors will adopt this spec?