URI Scheme for Java(tm) Message Service 1.0
RFC 6167

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

Summary: Needs a YES.

[Lars Eggert]

Comment (2011-01-17)

INTRODUCTION, paragraph 4:
>    The syntax of this 'jms' URI is not compatible with any known current
>    vendor implementation, but the expressivity of the format should
>    permit all vendors to use it.

  So are there vendor implementations of 'jms' already? If yes, what it
  the value in publishing a specification that is not compatible with
  any of them? Or do we have an indication that the vendors will adopt
  this spec?