datatracker.ietf.org
Sign In
Version 4.50, 2013-05-15
Report a bug

BGP Persistence
draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-persistence-01

Expired Internet-Draft (None)
Document Stream: No stream defined
Last updated: 2012-03-12
Intended RFC status: (None)
Other versions: (expired, archived): plain text, pdf, html

Document shepherd:(None)
Shepherd writeup

IESG State: Expired
Responsible AD: (None)
Send notices to: No addresses provided

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. Unofficial copies of old Internet-Drafts can be found here:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-persistence.

Abstract:
For certain AFI/SAFI combinations it is desirable that a BGP speaker be able to retain routing state learned over a session that has terminated. By maintaining routing state forwarding may be preserved. This technique works effectively as long as the AFI/SAFI is primarily used to realize services that do not depend on exchanging BGP routing state with peers or customers. There may be exceptions based upon the amount and frequency of route exchange that allow for this technique. Generally the BGP protocol tightly couples the viability of a session and the routing state that is learned over it. This is driven by the history of the protocol and it's application in the internet space as a vehicle to exchange routing state between administrative authorities. This document addresses new services whose requirements for persistence diverge from the Internet routing point of view.

Authors:
James Uttaro <ju1738@att.com>
Adam Simpson <adam.simpson@alcatel-lucent.com>
Rob Shakir <rjs@cw.net>
Clarence Filsfils <cf@cisco.com>
Pradosh Mohapatra <pmohapat@cisco.com>
Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid)