datatracker.ietf.org
Sign In
Version 4.50, 2013-05-15
Report a bug

OSPF extensions for support spectrum sub-band allocation
draft-wang-ccamp-flexigrid-wavelength-range-ospf-02

Active Internet-Draft (None)
Document Stream: No stream defined
Last updated: 2013-02-26
Intended RFC status: (None)
Other versions: plain text, pdf, html

Document shepherd:(None)
Shepherd writeup

IESG State: I-D Exists
Responsible AD: (None)
Send notices to: No addresses provided

Network Working Group                                         Qilei Wang
Internet-Draft                                                  Xihua Fu
Intended status: Standards Track                         ZTE Corporation
Expires: August 29, 2013                                    Feb 25, 2013

        OSPF extensions for support spectrum sub-band allocation
        draft-wang-ccamp-flexigrid-wavelength-range-ospf-02.txt

Abstract

   This document addresses the requirements and routing protocol
   extension of spectrum sub-band allocation in order to help reduce
   non-linear effect and raise spectrum utilization rate in the scenario
   of indiscriminately positioning of various channels with different
   bit rates.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 29, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Qilei Wang & Xihua Fu    Expires August 29, 2013                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft        spectrum sub-band allocation              Feb 2013

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  Conventions used in this document  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   3.  Overview of the Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   4.  Extension of routing protocol  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     4.1.  Relationship with WSON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     4.2.  Extensions of OSPF Protocol to Support Spectrum Group
           Allocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
       4.2.1.  Spectrum sub-band Allocation by Bitrates . . . . . . .  7
   5.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   6.  IANA considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   7.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     7.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     7.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Qilei Wang & Xihua Fu    Expires August 29, 2013                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft        spectrum sub-band allocation              Feb 2013

1.  Introduction

   In current DWDM systems, completely freedom and indiscriminate
   positioning of various channels with different bit rates is likely to
   lead to dramatically impaired system performance due to XPM (Cross-
   phased Modulation) effect and low spectrum utilization rate.

   Cross phase modulation (XPM) is known as the phenomenon that
   variations of intensity of one optical signal can change the
   refractive index of the fiber, and modulate the phase of the other
   optical signals co-propagating in the same fiber.

   When DWDM was first introduced, the typical wavelength date rate was
   2.5Gb/s. 10Gb/s wavelength was enabled because of the development of
   higher performance optical modulators.  However, the same simple
   modulation format was used at both 2.5Gb/s and 10Gb/s.  The
   modulation technique is Intensity Modulation with Direct Detection
   (IM-DD).  Barrier appeared if we want a wavelength to transport data
   with 40 Gb/s bitrate or more.After years of development, coherent
   technology is introduced to broken the limit for 40Gb/s and soon for
   100Gb/s transmission.

   Intensity modulation direct detection (IM-DD) systems are less
   sensitive to the variation of phase of the signal and is going to
   bring the variation of the intensity, then the changes of refractive