Encrypting the Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) Attribute-Value Pairs
draft-yegin-pana-encr-avp-10
Yes
(Ralph Droms)
No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -05)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-08-11 for -07)
Unknown
You need to expand the acronyms on first use in the main body even if you have already expanded them in the Abstract. --- There are a number of SHALLs used to define behavior, and this is fine. But where a message format is implied (for example "There SHALL be only one Encr-Encap AVP in a PANA message") shouldn't you state the behavior of a receiver when a non-conformant mesage is received? I suspect this is as simple as a global catch-all refering processing of non-conformant messages to RFC 5191.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-08-28 for -08)
Unknown
[Updated] Version -08 resolves my DISCUSS and most of my non-blocking comments; thanks. Authors: "The reference to MSK will be made to RFC 5191 as it is defined there (which in turn references RFC 3748)" I don't think 5191 is the right reference: I don't think MSK is defined in 5191. I think MSK is defined in 3748, and that 5191 contains MSK in its Terminology section but defers to 3748 for the definition. That's precisely WHY the MSK entry in 5191 Section 2 refers to 3748, and if you want to know anything substantive about MSKs and how they're derived and work, you need to go to 3748. I think it's best to point directly to 3748 here, rather than pointing to something that points to 3748. It's not like references are expensive.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-09-07)
Unknown
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS point and making the IANA section much clearer in its requests.
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-08-15 for -07)
Unknown
Barry and Brian's comments cover my concerns.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(for -09)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-08-28 for -08)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown