datatracker.ietf.org
Sign In
Version 4.45, 2013-05-14
Report a bug

Multicast transition path optimization in IPv4 and IPv6 networks
draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization-03

Active Internet-Draft (None)
Document Stream: No stream defined
Last updated: 2013-02-21
Intended RFC status: (None)
Other versions: plain text, pdf, html

Document shepherd:(None)
Shepherd writeup

IESG State: I-D Exists
Responsible AD: (None)
Send notices to: No addresses provided

Internet Engineering Task Force                                   Q. Sun
Internet-Draft                                             China Telecom
Intended status: Informational                                   C. Zhou
Expires: August 24, 2013                             Huawei Technologies
                                                       February 20, 2013

    Multicast transition path optimization in IPv4 and IPv6 networks
            draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization-03

Abstract

   This document describes a mechanism to optimize the path between the
   multicast router and multicast source in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.
   The basic idea is that when a multicast translation router has an
   IPv4 path and an IPv6 path to the same multicast data source, and
   both IPv4 and IPv6 joins are received, only one path is used.  One
   path is pruned, instead of the same traffic flowing over both v4 and
   v6 paths.  By adding a metric to the IPv4 path, the multicast
   translation router can determine which path to receive multicast
   data: IPv4 path, IPv6 path or both.  Therefore, an optimization path
   will typically be chosen when an identical v4/v6 traffic flow exists.

Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in .

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 24, 2013.

Copyright Notice

Sun & Zhou               Expires August 24, 2013                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft         Multrans path optimization          February 2013

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   3.  Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   4.  Solution Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
     4.1.  A general topology for IPv4 and IPv6 multicast networks . . 5
     4.2.  Parsing MTR to two virtual Routers  . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
     4.3.  Selecting interfaces to Source or RP  . . . . . . . . . . . 7
     4.4.  Selecting a multicast data flow from upstream interface . . 7
     4.5.  Requirements to the mulitcast Router  . . . . . . . . . . . 7
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
   6.  Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
   7.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
   8.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Sun & Zhou               Expires August 24, 2013                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft         Multrans path optimization          February 2013

1.  Introduction

   It is common to use multi-access LANs such as Ethernet for
   transmitting multicast data in networks.  Section 3.6 of[RFC4601]
   describes Multi-Access Transit LANs.

   The PIM Assert message could be used when there are two identical
   multicast data flows (IPv4 and IPv6).  When duplicate data packets
   appear on the LAN from different routers, the routers notice this and
   then select a single forwarder.  This selection is performed using