Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-15
review-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-15-genart-lc-holmberg-2023-10-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2023-10-27
Requested 2023-10-13
Authors Kazunori Fujiwara , Paul A. Vixie
I-D last updated 2023-10-23
Completed reviews Dnsdir Telechat review of -16 by Vladimír Čunát (diff)
Artart Telechat review of -16 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -16 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -15 by Vladimír Čunát (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -15 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -15 by Mirja Kühlewind (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -13 by Vladimír Čunát (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -15 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Christer Holmberg
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/VBI2ri6JwD9TEPjcxKBi828dVs4
Reviewed revision 15 (document currently at 17)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2023-10-23
review-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-15-genart-lc-holmberg-2023-10-23-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-15
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review Date: 2023-10-23
IETF LC End Date: 2023-10-27
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The document is well written, and easy to read and understand. I only
have one minor issue/question that I'd like the authors to address.

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues:

Q1: R3 and R6 mentions the recommended size of 1400. I think it would be useful
with a reference to Annex B, where this value is justified.

Nits/editorial comments: N/A