Early Review of draft-ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs-00
review-ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs-00-rtgdir-early-sinicrope-2016-06-27-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2016-06-27 | |
Requested | 2016-05-05 | |
Authors | Daniel Migault , Joel M. Halpern , Susan Hares | |
I-D last updated | 2016-06-27 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -00
by Dave Sinicrope
(diff)
|
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Dave Sinicrope |
State | Completed | |
Request | Early review on draft-ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 00 (document currently at 06) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2016-06-27 |
review-ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs-00-rtgdir-early-sinicrope-2016-06-27-00
Hello, I am the Routing Area Directorate member that was assigned the QA review of draft- ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs-01 . If you’re not familiar with the QA review process please see: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDirDocQa BR Dave General Comments: - overall the document is organized well and has a good flow leading from overall issues to specific issues and justified requirements. - the document presumes familiarity with the I2RS architecture and states this plainly cuing the reader to look there first. That said the document can be read standalone with a conceptual knowledge of the I2RS architecture. See the attached document for marked up and inline comments. Nits - singular / plural usage needs to be consistent - verb plural and tense match need attention Note: I got through page 14. Many comments earlier in the doc apply to the few remaining sections. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dave Attachment: draft-ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs-01.docx Description: draft-ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs-01.docx