Telechat Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-07
review-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-07-genart-telechat-campbell-2014-08-08-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2014-08-05 | |
Requested | 2014-07-31 | |
Authors | Raymond Key , Lucy Yong , Simon DeLord , Frederic JOUNAY , Lizhong Jin | |
I-D last updated | 2014-08-08 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -06
by Ben Campbell
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Ben Campbell (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ben Campbell |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 10) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2014-08-08 |
review-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-07-genart-telechat-campbell-2014-08-08-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-07 Reviewer: Ben Campbell Review Date: 2014-08-05 IETF LC End Date: 2014-07-15 IESG Telechat date: 2014-08-07 Summary: Ready for publication as informational. All of the substantive comments from my last call review of version 06 have been addressed. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: -- References: 2119 language has been removed, but there's still a reference to RFC 2119. -- 2.2, 4th paragraph: Furthermore, MEF also defines AC roles... This draft defines the AC roles in the terminology section. It would be helpful to mention if the MEF definitions are the same as used here, either in this section or in the respective terminology section entries. -- 5.1, 1st sentence: The change due to one of my previous comments renders the beginning of the sentence as " "IP/MPLS L2VPN architecture has no distinction role on Attachment Circuit ..." Should "distinction" be "distinctive"? If not, I'm not sure how to parse the sentence.