Last Call Review of draft-ietf-siprec-protocol-16
review-ietf-siprec-protocol-16-opsdir-lc-bradner-2015-05-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-siprec-protocol
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2015-05-26
Requested 2015-05-04
Authors Leon Portman , Henry Lum , Charles Eckel , Alan Johnston , Andrew Hutton
I-D last updated 2015-05-28
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -16 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Scott O. Bradner
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-siprec-protocol by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 16 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready
Completed 2015-05-28
review-ietf-siprec-protocol-16-opsdir-lc-bradner-2015-05-28-00
I did an OPS-DIR review of draft-ietf-siprec-protocol-16.

This document describes a mechanism for recording SIP 
sessions, ostensibly, only with the knowledge of the SIP endpoints.

The document is clear and mature (which I would hope was
the case for a -16 working group ID).  In particular, the security 
considerations section seems quite well written to me.

I find no additional operational concerns beyond those 
present in running any secure SIP infrastructure.

I do observe that the stage upon which this standards
track ID is dancing on is rather close to the forbidden 
zone as described by RFC 2804. But the stage was 
selected when the working group was formed and it
 is too late to revisit if that was a stage that an IETF 
working group should be dancing on.
 

Scott