Last Call Review of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-
review-melnikov-smtp-priority-secdir-lc-lonvick-2012-04-03-00
Request | Review of | draft-melnikov-smtp-priority |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 21) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2012-03-28 | |
Requested | 2012-03-01 | |
Authors | Alexey Melnikov , Ken Carlberg | |
I-D last updated | 2012-04-03 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -??
by Roni Even
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Roni Even Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Chris M. Lonvick |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Chris M. Lonvick |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-melnikov-smtp-priority by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Completed | 2012-04-03 |
review-melnikov-smtp-priority-secdir-lc-lonvick-2012-04-03-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Overall, the proposal to insert a MT-PRIORITY header appears reasonable. I don't think that it opens any security threats that are not noted in the document. I am concerned that this feature can disrupt the DKIM protection as noted in section 11.1. I see the problem here and I can't offer any suggestions to fix that. I think that the authors have done well to document this. Thanks, Chris