datatracker.ietf.org
Sign In
Version 4.45, 2013-05-14
Report a bug

Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Configuration Option for DHCPv6
RFC 4075

Document history

DateVersionByText
2012-08-22 01 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Thomas Narten
2012-08-22 01 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bert Wijnen
2012-08-22 01 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Harald Alvestrand
2012-08-22 01 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Alex Zinin
2005-05-31 01 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-05-31 01 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4075' added by Amy Vezza
2005-05-23 01 (System) RFC published
2004-12-07 01 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-12-06 01 Amy Vezza IESG has approved and state has been changed to 'Approved-Announcement sent' by Amy Vezza.
2004-12-06 01 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-12-03 01 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-12-02
2004-12-02 01 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-12-02 01 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Thomas Narten
2004-12-01 01 Michelle Cotton IANA Comments: Upon approval of this document, the IANA will assign 1 option code in the following registry:
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/dhcpv6-parameters>
2004-11-30 01 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-11-28 01 Margaret Wasserman State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Margaret Wasserman
2004-11-28 01 Margaret Wasserman Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-12-02 by Margaret Wasserman
2004-11-28 01 Margaret Wasserman [Note]: 'Back on the agenda for re-review by Thomas. Thomas does this address your discuss?' added by Margaret Wasserman
2004-11-01 01 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alex Zinin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Alex Zinin
2004-10-28 01 Margaret Wasserman Sent follow-up message to Thomas and Alex to see if their discusses have been addressed:

To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
Subject: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-sntp-01.txt
Cc: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>, vibhaska@cisco.com

Hi Thomas and Alex,

There is a new version of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-sntp available that is intended to address your discuss comments.  You can find it at:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-sntp-01.txt

If this addresses your comments, could you please clear your discusses?  If not, please let us know what issues remain.

Vijay, thanks for getting this document out before the deadline.  Sorry for losing touch earlier, and I hope we'll be able to get this through this time.

Margaret
2004-10-28 01 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] Position for Harald Alvestrand has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Harald Alvestrand
2004-10-28 01 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
The language on IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in this document is acceptable to me.
DISCUSS removed.
2004-10-26 01 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-10-26 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-sntp-01 (diff from -00)
2004-09-24 00 Margaret Wasserman Sent prod to author:

To: vijayak@india.hp.com, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
Subject: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-sntp-00.txt
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>

Hi Vijay,

It has been 8 months since draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-sntp-00.txt was reviewed by the IESG, but the document has not been updated to address the blocking IESG comments (copied below).  I am confused by this, as the IESG comments were not particularly complex.  We even had a call with Harald where we agreed to the wording required to address his issue.

Is there a problem with updating this document?  Vijay, if you no longer have any time to spend on this effort, should Ralph look for someone else to carry this work forward?

Margaret

(included discusses and comments)
2004-08-08 00 Margaret Wasserman Sent follow-up message to author requesting new version to address discuss comments.
2004-05-22 00 Margaret Wasserman Reached agreement on text for Harald's DHCPv4/v6 issue on conference call.  Waiting for document update to address that issue and other discusses.
2004-02-05 00 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot discuss] This document should specify whether or not SNTPv4 servers can be listed in the options list. If they can, it should specify how ...
[show all]
2004-02-05 00 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-02-02 00 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bert Wijnen
2004-01-22 00 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-01-22 00 Thomas Narten
[Ballot discuss] > The Simple Network Time Protocol Servers option provides a list of > one or more IPv6 addresses of SNTP [3] servers available to the ...
[show all]
2004-01-22 00 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-01-22 00 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-01-22 00 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-01-22 00 Ned Freed [Ballot comment]
No further objection, but I concur with Pekka in believing that handling NTP
is at least as important as handling SNTP.
2004-01-22 00 Ned Freed [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ned Freed by Ned Freed
2004-01-22 00 Alex Zinin [Ballot discuss]
Section 5 should say what the receiver should do if the option [number] appears in a message it is not supposed to.
2004-01-22 00 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-01-22 00 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jon Peterson has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Jon Peterson
2004-01-22 00 Jon Peterson [Ballot comment]
The end of the sentence in Section 3 might want to include a direct reference to the DHCPv6 spec (presumably, [1]).
2004-01-22 00 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-01-21 00 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-01-20 00 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-01-20 00 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-01-20 00 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment] From OPS DIrectorate (Pekka): nits: - spell out SNTP in the Abstract - acknowledgement section should be split to a real acknowledgement section, and the ...
[show all]
2004-01-20 00 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss] From OPS Directorate (Pekka): Biggest concern: - This I-D describes only SNTP. Where are the options for NTP? NTP is at least as important ...
[show all]
2004-01-20 00 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-01-15 00 Margaret Wasserman Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-01-22 by Margaret Wasserman
2004-01-07 00 Margaret Wasserman State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Margaret Wasserman
2004-01-07 00 Margaret Wasserman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman
2004-01-07 00 Margaret Wasserman Ballot has been issued by Margaret Wasserman
2004-01-07 00 Margaret Wasserman Created "Approve" ballot
2003-12-31 00 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2003-12-15 00 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2003-12-15 00 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2003-12-15 00 Margaret Wasserman Last Call was requested by Margaret Wasserman
2003-12-15 00 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2003-12-15 00 (System) Last call text was added
2003-12-15 00 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-12-15 00 Margaret Wasserman State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Margaret Wasserman
2003-11-25 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-sntp-00