datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.3.0, 2014-04-12
Report a bug

Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Configuration Option for DHCPv6
RFC 4075

Diffs

Document history

DateVersionByText
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Thomas Narten
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bert Wijnen
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Harald Alvestrand
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Alex Zinin
2005-05-31 RFC Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-05-31 RFC Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4075' added by Amy Vezza
2005-05-23 RFC (System) RFC published
2004-12-07 01 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-12-06 01 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-12-06 01 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-12-06 01 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-12-03 01 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-12-02
2004-12-02 01 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-12-02 01 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Thomas Narten
2004-12-01 01 Michelle Cotton IANA Comments: Upon approval of this document, the IANA will assign 1 option code in the following registry:
<http: www.iana.org="" assignments="" dhcpv6-parameters="">
2004-11-30 01 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-11-28 01 Margaret Wasserman State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Margaret Wasserman
2004-11-28 01 Margaret Wasserman Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-12-02 by Margaret Wasserman
2004-11-28 01 Margaret Wasserman [Note]: 'Back on the agenda for re-review by Thomas. Thomas does this address your discuss?' added by Margaret Wasserman
2004-11-01 01 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alex Zinin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Alex Zinin
2004-10-28 01 Margaret Wasserman
Sent follow-up message to Thomas and Alex to see if their discusses have been addressed:

To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>;, Alex Zinin <zinin ...[show all]
2004-10-28 01 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] Position for Harald Alvestrand has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Harald Alvestrand
2004-10-28 01 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
The language on IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in this document is acceptable to me.
DISCUSS removed.
2004-10-26 01 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-10-26 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-sntp-01.txt (diff from previous)
2004-09-24 00 Margaret Wasserman
Sent prod to author:

To: vijayak@india.hp.com, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>;
From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>;
Subject: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-sntp-00.txt
Cc: Thomas ...[show all]
2004-08-08 00 Margaret Wasserman Sent follow-up message to author requesting new version to address discuss comments.
2004-05-22 00 Margaret Wasserman Reached agreement on text for Harald's DHCPv4/v6 issue on conference call.  Waiting for document update to address that issue and other discusses.
2004-02-05 00 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot discuss]
This document should specify whether or not SNTPv4 servers can be listed in the options list.
If they can, it should specify how ...[show all]
2004-02-05 00 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-02-02 00 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bert Wijnen
2004-01-22 00 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-01-22 00 Thomas Narten
[Ballot discuss]
>    The Simple Network Time Protocol Servers option provides a list of
>    one or more IPv6 addresses of SNTP [3] servers available to the ...[show all]
2004-01-22 00 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-01-22 00 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-01-22 00 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-01-22 00 Ned Freed [Ballot comment]
No further objection, but I concur with Pekka in believing that handling NTP
is at least as important as handling SNTP.
2004-01-22 00 Ned Freed [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ned Freed by Ned Freed
2004-01-22 00 Alex Zinin [Ballot discuss]
Section 5 should say what the receiver should do if the option [number] appears in a message it is not supposed to.
2004-01-22 00 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-01-22 00 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jon Peterson has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Jon Peterson
2004-01-22 00 Jon Peterson [Ballot comment]
The end of the sentence in Section 3 might want to include a direct reference to the DHCPv6 spec (presumably, [1]).
2004-01-22 00 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-01-21 00 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-01-20 00 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-01-20 00 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-01-20 00 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
From OPS DIrectorate (Pekka):

nits:
- spell out SNTP in the Abstract
- acknowledgement section should be split to a real acknowledgement
  section, and the ...[show all]
2004-01-20 00 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
From OPS Directorate (Pekka):

Biggest concern:

- This I-D describes only SNTP.  Where are the options for NTP?  NTP is
  at least as important ...[show all]
2004-01-20 00 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-01-15 00 Margaret Wasserman Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-01-22 by Margaret Wasserman
2004-01-07 00 Margaret Wasserman State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Margaret Wasserman
2004-01-07 00 Margaret Wasserman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman
2004-01-07 00 Margaret Wasserman Ballot has been issued by Margaret Wasserman
2004-01-07 00 Margaret Wasserman Created "Approve" ballot
2003-12-31 00 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2003-12-15 00 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2003-12-15 00 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2003-12-15 00 Margaret Wasserman Last Call was requested by Margaret Wasserman
2003-12-15 00 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2003-12-15 00 (System) Last call text was added
2003-12-15 00 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-12-15 00 Margaret Wasserman State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Margaret Wasserman
2003-11-25 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-sntp-00.txt