datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.6.2.p6, 2014-09-03
Report a bug

IANA Considerations for OSPF
RFC 4940

Diffs

Document history

DateVersionByText
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Mark Townsley
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2007-08-13 RFC Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2007-08-13 RFC Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4940
BCP 0130' added by Amy Vezza
2007-07-18 RFC (System) RFC published
2007-05-14 03 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2007-05-14 03 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2007-05-11 03 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2007-05-11 03 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2007-05-11 03 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2007-05-08 03 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2007-03-27 03 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2007-03-22 03 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2007-03-20 03 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2007-03-20 03 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2007-03-20 03 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2007-03-20 03 Bill Fenner State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Bill Fenner
2007-03-20 03 Bill Fenner -03 fixes the last remaining issue (moving one registry's creation to ospf-cap) so is approved.
2007-03-20 03 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2007-03-20 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ospf-iana-03.txt (diff from previous)
2007-03-18 02 Bill Fenner State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Bill Fenner
2007-03-18 02 Bill Fenner DISCUSSes are now all clear.  Waiting for -03 to come through to fix IANA's final concern, then this will be approved.
2007-03-18 02 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mark Townsley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Mark Townsley
2007-03-06 02 Jari Arkko The text changes that I requested are now in -02 version. Thanks!
2007-03-06 02 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2007-03-05 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ospf-iana-02.txt (diff from previous)
2007-03-01 01 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
> A range of values MAY be reserved for Experimentation as set out in
> [9].
...
> It is unclear at this point if it makes ...[show all]
2007-03-01 01 Mark Townsley
[Ballot discuss]
Section 2.4.1 contains:

  There is no range for Vendor Private Use, as there is no space for an
  enterprise code to ...[show all]
2007-03-01 01 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mark Townsley has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Mark Townsley
2007-03-01 01 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mark Townsley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Mark Townsley
2006-11-13 01 Yoshiko Fong
IANA Comments:

This document is not ready to be evaluated by IANA in a meaningful
way. IANA requests that the editors add the initial contents ...[show all]
2006-09-01 01 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-08-31
2006-08-31 01 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2006-08-31 01 Mark Townsley [Ballot comment]
2006-08-31 01 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mark Townsley has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Amy Vezza
2006-08-31 01 Mark Townsley
[Ballot discuss]
Section 2.4.1 contains:

  There is no range for Vendor Private Use, as there is no space for an
  enterprise code to ...[show all]
2006-08-31 01 Mark Townsley
[Ballot comment]
Section 2.4.1 contains:

  There is no range for Vendor Private Use, as there is no space for an
  enterprise code to ...[show all]
2006-08-31 01 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2006-08-31 01 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2006-08-31 01 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Brian Carpenter
2006-08-31 01 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
> A range of values MAY be reserved for Experimentation as set out in
> [9].
...
> It is unclear at this point if it makes ...[show all]
2006-08-31 01 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2006-08-31 01 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson
2006-08-31 01 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by David Kessens
2006-08-30 01 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2006-08-30 01 Mark Townsley
[Ballot comment]
Section 2.4.1 contains:

  There is no range for Vendor Private Use, as there is no space for an
  enterprise code to ...[show all]
2006-08-30 01 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2006-08-30 01 Cullen Jennings [Ballot comment]
Seems like this should be a PS that updates the OSPF RFC not an BCP.

The IANA consideration section is not good :-)
2006-08-30 01 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2006-08-29 01 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2006-08-29 01 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sam Hartman
2006-08-29 01 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot comment]
In the Introduction I find:
  A range of values MAY be reserved for Experimentation as set out in
  [9].  Values from this range ...[show all]
2006-08-28 01 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ted Hardie
2006-08-28 01 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
This document seems to update all of the OSPF RFCs, so I think there
  should be an "Updates" line in the title page ...[show all]
2006-08-28 01 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
This document seems to update all of the OSPF RFCs, so I think there
  should be an "Updates" line in the title page ...[show all]
2006-08-28 01 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2006-08-28 01 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2006-08-22 01 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Lisa Dusseault by Lisa Dusseault
2006-08-22 01 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bill Fenner
2006-08-22 01 Bill Fenner Ballot has been issued by Bill Fenner
2006-08-22 01 Bill Fenner Created "Approve" ballot
2006-08-22 01 Bill Fenner State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Bill Fenner
2006-08-21 01 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2006-08-07 01 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2006-08-07 01 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2006-08-07 01 Bill Fenner Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-08-31 by Bill Fenner
2006-08-07 01 Bill Fenner Intended Status has been changed to BCP from Proposed Standard
2006-08-07 01 Bill Fenner State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Bill Fenner
2006-08-07 01 Bill Fenner Last Call was requested by Bill Fenner
2006-08-07 01 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2006-08-07 01 (System) Last call text was added
2006-08-07 01 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2006-07-24 01 Bill Fenner
State Change Notice email list have been change to <b>ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org> from acee@cisco.com, dube.rohit@gmail ...[show all]
2005-10-24 01 Bill Fenner
1. Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the
  Internet Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe
  this ID is ready to forward ...[show all]
2005-10-24 01 Bill Fenner
From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>;
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ospf-cap-07.txt
Date: Fri, Jul 1 07:20:12
To: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org ...[show all]
2005-10-24 01 Bill Fenner Draft Added by Bill Fenner in state Publication Requested
2005-06-23 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ospf-iana-01.txt (diff from previous)
2005-04-01 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ospf-iana-00.txt