Sieve Email Filtering: Relational Extension
RFC 5231

Per Barry Leiba, an implementation report is not yet available. The document includes references to two I-Ds and one Proposed Standard (2822). Draft standards can ...

Per Barry Leiba, an implementation report is not yet available.

The document includes references to two I-Ds and one Proposed Standard
(2822).  Draft standards can't include normative references to documents at
a lower level on the standards track without having to invoke variance
procedures.  I can't invoke those procedures for I-Ds.

Given the lack of an implementation report and the normative reference
issues I have to push this one back to you guys.  The document might be
done, but I can't ask the IESG to evaluate the document for Draft Standard
status without having these other procedural issues resolved.

idnits output: idnits 1.84 tmp/draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-04.txt: Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html: Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate ...

idnits output:

idnits 1.84

tmp/draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-04.txt:


  Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:
   
    Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate...

  * The document seems to lack an RFC 3978 Section 5.4 Copyright Line --
    however, there's a paragraph with a matching beginning. Boilerplate error?

    RFC 3978 Section 5.4 paragraph 1 text:
    "Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006)."
 
    ... text found in draft:
    "Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  This document is subject
............................................^
    to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
    except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.")


  * The document seems to lack an RFC 3978 Section 5.4 Reference to BCP 78.

    RFC 3978 Section 5.4 paragraph 2 text:
    "This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
    contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
    retain all their rights."


  Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt:
    Nothing found here (but these checks do not cover all of
    1id-guidelines.txt yet).

  Miscellaneous warnings:
    None.

These look like idnits errors; I'll check.  The proto write-up said that idnits passed without error -- why?