Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Venaas
Request for Comments: 6450 Cisco Systems
Category: Standards Track December 2011
ISSN: 2070-1721
Multicast Ping Protocol
Abstract
The Multicast Ping Protocol specified in this document allows for
checking whether an endpoint can receive multicast -- both Source-
Specific Multicast (SSM) and Any-Source Multicast (ASM). It can also
be used to obtain additional multicast-related information, such as
multicast tree setup time. This protocol is based on an
implementation of tools called "ssmping" and "asmping".
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6450.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Venaas Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 6450 Multicast Ping Protocol December 2011
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................2
1.1. Requirements Language ......................................2
2. Architecture ....................................................3
3. Protocol Specification ..........................................6
3.1. Option Format ..............................................7
3.2. Defined Options ............................................7
3.3. Packet Format .............................................13
3.4. Message Types and Options .................................13
3.5. Rate Limiting .............................................15
3.5.1. Message Rate Variables .............................16
4. Client Behaviour ...............................................16
5. Server Behaviour ...............................................18
6. Recommendations for Implementers ...............................19
7. IANA Considerations ............................................20
8. Security Considerations ........................................21
9. Acknowledgments ................................................22
10. References ....................................................23
10.1. Normative References .....................................23
10.2. Informative References ...................................23
1. Introduction
The Multicast Ping Protocol specified in this document allows for
checking multicast connectivity. In addition to checking reception
of multicast (SSM or ASM), the protocol can provide related
information, such as multicast tree setup time, the number of hops
the packets have traveled, and packet delay and loss. This
functionality resembles, in part, the ICMP Echo Request/Reply
mechanism [RFC0792], but uses UDP [RFC0768] and requires that both a
client and a server implement this protocol. Intermediate routers
are not required to support this protocol. They forward protocol
messages and data traffic as usual.
This protocol is based on the current implementation of the ssmping
and asmping tools [IMPL], which are widely used by the Internet
community to conduct multicast connectivity tests.
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Venaas Standards Track [Page 2]