Summary: Has enough positions to pass.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
It looks like we didn't note last time that: % 1. Specify a discovery mechanism for CAA records to replace the one % described in RFC 6844. Implementation experience has demonstrated an % ambiguity in the handling of CNAME and DNAME records during discovery % in RFC 6844, and subsequent discussion has suggested that a different % discovery approach would resolve limitations inherent in that approach. is potentially ambiguous about "that approach" -- it's the RFC 6844 one that we want to fix, not the new one, of course.
I'm a No Objection, but I had comments on this charter when we balloted for External Review, and it looks like this is the same version that I commented on. Thread started at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/hvivetNqR4T4xfEtSsOKd4auw18. Do the right thing, of course. Spencer
“Said it before, and I’ll say it again...”