Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
charter-ietf-lamps-08
Yes
Roman Danyliw
(Benjamin Kaduk)
(Erik Kline)
No Objection
(Alvaro Retana)
(Francesca Palombini)
(Lars Eggert)
(Martin Duke)
(Martin Vigoureux)
(Murray Kucherawy)
(Robert Wilton)
- Approve (01-00)
- Ready for external review (01-00)
- Approve (01-00)
- Ready for external review (02-00)
- Approve (02-00)
- Ready for external review (03-00)
- Approve (03-01)
- Ready for external review (04-00)
- Approve (04-01)
- Ready for external review (05-00)
- Approve (05-01)
- Ready for external review (06-02)
- Approve (06-03)
- Ready for external review (07-00)
- Approve (07-00)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05-01 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Roman Danyliw
Yes
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment
(2021-05-20 for -05-01)
Sent
PQC is of course a must but I wonder why in 5.a only the US NIST algorithms will be used ? Can we use a wording as in 5.b (i.e., not limiting ourself to US NIST) ? Regards -éric
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -05-01)
Not sent
Erik Kline Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -05-01)
Not sent
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05-01)
Not sent
Francesca Palombini Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05-01)
Not sent
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05-01)
Not sent
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2021-05-14 for -05-01)
Sent for earlier
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05-01)
Not sent
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05-01)
Not sent
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05-01)
Not sent