Internet Engineering Task Force                        Mark Baugher
   MMUSIC Working Group                                  Cisco Systems
   INTERNET-DRAFT
   EXPIRES: March 30, 2003                          September 30, 2002


              SDP Security Descriptions for Media Streams
               <draft-baugher-mmusic-sdpmediasec-00.txt>


Status of this memo

   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
   months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
   at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or cite them other than as "work in progress".

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/lid-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html



Abstract

   This Internet Draft gives a generic cryptographic attribute to
   Session Description Protocol (SDP) media streams.  The attribute
   describes a cryptographic key and other parameters, which serve to
   configure security for a media stream.  This draft also defines the
   SRTP parameters for the attribute.  The SDP crypto attribute
   requires the services of a data security protocol to secure the SDP
   message.














INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002


   TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Notational Conventions...........................................2
2.0 Introduction.....................................................2
3.0 SDP Media Security Descriptions..................................3
 3.1 Cryptographic Key Parameters....................................4
 3.2 Security-Session Parameters.....................................4
 3.3 Examples........................................................4
4.0 SRTP Media Security Descriptions.................................5
 4.1 CRYPTO_SUITE=crypto_suite.......................................7
   4.1.1 CRYPTO_SUITE=AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32........................7
   4.1.2 CRYPTO_SUITE=F8_128_HMAC_SHA1_32............................7
   4.1.3 CRYPTO_SUITE=AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80........................7
   4.1.4 CRYPTO_SUITE=NULL...........................................7
   4.1.5 Adding new CRYPTO_SUITE definitions.........................8
 4.2 MKEY=srtp_mkey..................................................8
 4.3 SRTP Security-Session Parameters................................9
   4.3.1 SSRC=n......................................................9
   4.3.2 ROC=n.......................................................9
   4.3.3 ENCRYPTED_SRTCP.............................................9
   4.3.4 UNENCRYPTED_SRTP...........................................10
   4.3.5 UNAUTHENTICATED_SRTP.......................................10
   4.3.6 FEC_ORDER=order............................................10
5.0 Use with Offer/Answer...........................................10
6.0 Security Considerations.........................................13
7.0 Acknowledgements................................................15
8.0 Author's Address................................................15
9.0 References......................................................16


1.0 Notational Conventions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "MUST", "MUST NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
   The terminology conforms to [RFC2828].

2.0 Introduction

   Session Description Protocol (SDP) describes multimedia sessions,
   which often include Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) streams.
   When run under the RTP/SAVP profile, an RTP stream uses the Secure
   Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP).  The "RTP/SAVP" descriptor in
   an SDP m=line signals the use of SRTP for a media stream, but there
   are no means to configure SRTP beyond using defaults values.  This
   Internet Draft specifies an SDP attribute to signal a cryptographic
   key and other parameters for SRTP and other SDP media streams.

   Thus, the SDP crypto attribute provides generic security
   descriptions for SDP media streams.  In addition to RTP, the crypto
   attribute MAY be applied to white board, modem, fax, and other media



Baugher                                                       [Page 2]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002


   that could use various security protocols such as IPsec or SSL. Each
   SDP media transport, however, needs its own definitions that assign
   values to crypto-attribute parameters, which SHOULD be specified in
   an Internet RFC.  This Internet Draft is intended to be THE
   standards-track RFC that defines the parameter values for SRTP.
   With this I-D, an application developer can describe an SRTP key and
   its configuration according to application-specific needs.

   It would be self-defeating, however, to not secure cryptographic
   keys and other parameters as SRTP secures RTP messages or IPsec
   secures IP packets. Data security protocols such as SRTP rely upon
   an external key management system to securely establish encryption
   and/or authentication keys.  Key management protocols provide
   authenticated key establishment (AKE) procedures to authenticate the
   identity of each endpoint and protect against man-in-the-middle,
   reflection/replay, connection hijacking and some denial of service
   attacks [skeme].  Along with the key, an AKE protocol such as MIKEY,
   GDOI, KINK, IKE or TLS securely disseminates information describing
   both the key and the data-security session.  This service is needed
   because it is pointless to provide a key over a medium where an
   attacker can snoop the key, alter the definition of the key to
   render it useless, or change the parameters of the security session
   to gain unauthorized access to session-related information.

   SDP was not designed to provide AKE services, and the media security
   descriptions that follow do not add AKE services to SDP.  This
   specification is no replacement for a key management protocol or for
   the conveyance of key management messages in SDP [keymgt].  SDP
   media-stream security descriptions are suitable for restricted cases
   where IPsec, TLS, S/MIME or some other data-security protocol
   protects the SDP message.  This draft adds security descriptions to
   SDP messages through a new SDP attribute named "crypto," which
   informs the receiver of the cryptographic parameters of a media
   stream. The crypto attribute MAY contain a cryptographic key and
   other parameters that describe the key.  a=crypto MAY also contain
   "security session parameters" that are unique to a transport.

   Several a=crypto parameters are generic to all media transports, but
   their values MAY be unique to a particular transport. Section 3.0
   specifies the SDP crypto attribute generically. Section 4.0 defines
   the crypto attribute for SRTP.  Section 5.0 discusses use of the
   crypto attribute in Offer/Answer exchanges.  Section 6.0 recites
   security considerations.

3.0 SDP Media Security Descriptions

   A new SDP attribute called "crypto" describes the cryptographic and
   security-session parameters for one or more media entries (a=crypto
   MUST NOT appear at the SDP session level).

        a=crypto: key_parameters *<security_session parameters>



Baugher                                                       [Page 3]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002



   The next sections describe the cryptographic "key parameters" and
   explains the optional "security_session parameters."

3.1 Cryptographic Key Parameters

   There are four "key_parameters.

      1. transport=transport_descriptor
         Exactly one transport= MUST appear in a=crypto. The
         "transport_descriptor" is the transport value in an m=
         line.  For example, "transport=RTP/SAVP" describes the
         crypto attribute as an SRTP crypto attribute.

      2. format=format_descriptor
         Zero or more format= parameters MAY appear in a=crypto.
         The "format descriptor" is the format value in an m=
         line.  For example, "format=97" associates a=crypto
         with dynamic payload 97 from an a=rtpmap description.

      3. crypto_suite=value
         Zero or one crypto_suite= parameter MAY appear in a=crypto.
         The "value" is the authentication and encryption transforms
         that are applied to the media stream and is specific to the
         m= transport type.  Section 4.0 lists crypto_suite values
         for RTP/SAVP, the SRTP media transport type.

      4. mkey=(method) value
         Zero or one mkey= MAY appear in a=crypto to install a master
         key. "method" is either "uri" or "srtp."  The latter's "value"
         is an SRTP master key.  And the former "value" is a Uniform
         Resource Identifier value; the URI is a resource that SHOULD
         be queried to obtain the master key for the session.  As SDP
         descriptions for new media-stream transports are defined in
         the future, new methods (e.g. "SRTP") SHOULD be defined in an
         Internet RFC.  The mkey contains a random value that MUST be
         unique with respect to other mkey lines in the SDP message.
         Section 4.0 lists mkey values for RTP/SAVP, the SRTP media
         transport type.

   Thus, the crypto attribute describes a cryptographic key and other
   parameters for a transport type that appears in an m= line.

3.2 Security-Session Parameters

   There are no generic security-session parameters; these are specific
   to a particular transport (see Section 4.0).

3.3 Examples

   The first example shows a=crypto for the RTP/SAVP transport type.



Baugher                                                       [Page 4]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002



   v=0
   o=jdoe 2890844526 2890842807 IN IP4 10.47.16.5
   s=SDP Seminar
   i=A Seminar on the session description protocol
   u=http://www.example.com/seminars/sdp.pdf
   e=j.doe@example.com (Jane Doe)
   c=IN IP4 224.2.17.12/127
   t=2873397496 2873404696
   a=recvonly
   m=video 51372 RTP/SAVP 31
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP crypto_suite=AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/d0RmdmcmVCspeEc3QGZiNWpVLFJhQX1cfHAwJSoj/20/1:32
   m=audio 49170 RTP/SAVP 0
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/NzB4d1BINUAvLEw6UzF3WSJ+PSdFcGdUJShpX1Zj/20/1:32
   m=application 32416 udp wb
   a=orient:portrait

   This SDP message describes three "recvonly" media streams, two of
   which use the RTP/SAVP transport.  The first a=crypto line appears
   in the m=video media entry; it is associated with the RTP/SAVP
   transport of the m=video line and has a "AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80"
   crypto_suite; its mkey parameter carries the SRTP master key data
   and metadata. The m=audio media entry uses the default
   "crypto_suite=AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32." These are RTP/SAVP (SRTP)
   specific and defined in the next section.

   The a=crypto MAY identify a media stream with a format= in addition
   to a transport=.

   m=audio 49230 RTP/SAVP 96 97 98
   a=rtpmap:96 L8/8000
   a=rtpmap:97 L16/8000
   a=rtpmap:98 L16/11025/2
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=98 format=97
      mkey=(uri)"https://keyserver.com/SDPSeminar/"
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=96 crypto_suite=null

   This example describes SRTP services for RTP payload types L16/8000
   and L16/11025/2.  SRTP default values are implicitly signaled by the
   absence of crypto_suite and mkey parameters.  Media format 96,
   however, does not use SRTP services because the RTP/SAVP
   crypto_suite is null (see Section 4.0) for this media stream.

4.0 SRTP Media Security Descriptions

   The generic SDP media security descriptions of the preceding section
   need parameter values to be defined for specific media transports;
   this section defines needed crypto attribute values and parameters
   for the RTP/SAVP transport.  SRTP services for a media stream MUST



Baugher                                                       [Page 5]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002


   be signaled through the presence of an RTP/SAVP transport descriptor
   in the m= line and SHALL apply only to that media entry.

   There is no assurance that a receiver is capable of configuring its
   SRTP service with a particular crypto attribute parameter, but SRTP
   guarantees minimal interoperability among SRTP systems through the
   default SRTP parameters [srtp].  More capable SRTP receivers support
   a variety of parameter values beyond the SRTP defaults and can be
   configured by the crypto attribute.  A receiver that does not
   recognize a=crypto and assumes default SRTP parameters might receive
   a stream that uses non-default parameters, which will cause that
   receiver to fail.  An Offer/Answer capabilities exchange, however,
   allows sender and receiver to agree on parameters before
   commencement of the multimedia session (see Section 5.0).

   There are over twenty cryptographic parameters listed in the SRTP
   specification.  Many of these parameters have fixed values for
   particular cryptographic transforms; SRTP supports the addition of
   new transforms through the publication of a new Internet RFC that
   specifies default and mandatory values for the SRTP parameters.  At
   the time of multimedia session establishment, however, there is
   usually no need to provide unique settings for many of the SRTP
   parameters.  Thus, it is possible to simplify the list of parameters
   in "cryptographic suites" that fix a set of SRTP parameter values
   for the security session.  The list of SRTP parameters for SDP
   a=crypto follows.

   SDP SRTP Parameter       Description
   ------------------       -----------
   CRYPTO_SUITE             Encryption and authentication transforms
   MKEY                     Master key, salt and related parameters
   SSRC                     Source of data to an RTP session
   ROC                      Roll-over counter
   KEY_DERIVATION_RATE      Rate that the pseudo-random function (PRF)
                            is applied to a key
   ENCRYPTED_SRTCP          SRTCP messages are encrypted
   UNENCRYPTED_SRTP         SRTP messages are not encrypted
   UNAUTHENTICATED_SRTP     SRTP messages are not authenticated
   FEC_ORDER                Order of forward error correction (FEC)
                            relative to SRTP services

   Please refer to the SRTP specification for a complete list of
   parameters and their descriptions [p.32, srtp].  The CRYPTO_SUITE
   and MKEY values belong to the crypto_suite and mkey parameters of
   the SDP crypto attribute (Section 3.0).  These are defined in the
   next section and are followed by the SRTP security-session
   parameters.  In all cases, if a receiver cannot recognize a
   parameter or value outside of an Offer/Answer exchange (see Section
   5.0), then the receiver MUST NOT participate in the media stream and
   SHOULD log an "invalid name" condition.




Baugher                                                       [Page 6]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002


4.1 CRYPTO_SUITE=crypto_suite

   The crypto_suite value defaults to AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 but MAY
   be set to other valid crypto suites as defined below.  There are no
   means to set CRYPTO_SUITE to different values for SRTP and SRTCP. If
   a receiver does not support the particular crypto_suite outside of
   an Offer/Answer exchange (see Section 5.0), then the receiver MUST
   NOT participate in the media stream and SHOULD log an "unrecognized
   crypto_suite" condition.

4.1.1 CRYPTO_SUITE=AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32

   This is the SRTP default AES Counter Mode cipher and HMAC-SHA1
   message authentication having a 32-bit authentication tag.  The
   encryption and authentication key lengths are 128 bits.  The master
   salt value is 112 bits and the session salt value is 112 bits.
   These values apply to SRTP and to SRTCP.  The PRF is the default
   SRTP pseudo-random function that uses AES Counter Mode with a 128-
   bit key length.  Please review the Security Considerations section
   concerning keystream issues for group keys defined by an SDP
   direction attribute and multicast issues.

4.1.2 CRYPTO_SUITE=F8_128_HMAC_SHA1_32

   The SRTP f8 cipher is used with HMAC-SHA1 message authentication
   having a 32-bit authentication tag.  The encryption and
   authentication key lengths are 128 bits.  The master salt value is
   112 bits and the session salt value is 112 bits.  These values apply
   to SRTP and to SRTCP. The PRF is the default SRTP pseudo-random
   function that uses AES Counter Mode with a 128-bit key length.
   Please review the Security Considerations section concerning
   keystream issues for group keys defined by an SDP direction
   attribute and multicast issues.

4.1.3 CRYPTO_SUITE=AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80

   The SRTP AES Counter Mode cipher is used with HMAC-SHA1 message
   authentication having an 80-bit authentication tag.  The encryption
   and authentication key lengths are 128 bits.  The master salt value
   is 112 bits and the session salt value is 112 bits.  These values
   apply to SRTP and to SRTCP.  The PRF is the default SRTP pseudo-
   random function that uses AES Counter Mode with a 128-bit key
   length. Please review the Security Considerations section concerning
   keystream issues for group keys defined by an SDP direction
   attribute and multicast issues.

4.1.4 CRYPTO_SUITE=NULL

   No encryption or authentication are applied to SRTP or SRTCP.  This
   effectively disables all SRTP services for the RTP/SAVP media
   stream.



Baugher                                                       [Page 7]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002



4.1.5 Adding new CRYPTO_SUITE definitions

   As new transforms are added to SRTP, new definitions SHOULD be given
   for the SDP crypto attribute and published in a Internet RFC.
   Sections 4.1.1 through 4.1.4 illustrate how to define CRYPTO_SUITE
   values for particular cryptographic transforms.  New definitions MAY
   be added to existing transforms, moreover, to override defaults used
   in definitions 4.1.1 through 4.1.4.  For example, if an application
   needed to vary the size of the master or session salt key for any of
   the defined crypto suites, a new crypto suite SHOULD be defined in a
   Internet RFC that specifies the chosen size of the master or session
   salt key length.

4.2 MKEY=srtp_mkey

   The "srtp_mkey" has the following structure ("||" is the concatenate
   operator).

   /key_length/salt_length/BASE64(key||salt)/lifetime/MKI:MKI_length

   The "key_length" is the length of the master key, and "salt_length"
   is the length of the master salt.  If their sum is less than the sum
   of the lengths of the master key and salt of the crypto suite, then
   the receiver MUST NOT participate in the media stream and SHOULD log
   a "key length too short" condition. If their sum is greater than the
   crypto_suite sum, then bytes are truncated from the right (i.e.
   "little end").  The key_length and salt_length MUST appear in the
   mkey value.

   The third part of the srtp_mkey structure is the cryptographic
   master key appended with the master salt.  Each (master) key and
   salt MUST be a random number and MUST be unique to the SDP message.
   Both are base64 encoded (following concatenation).  If the length of
   the concatenated keys (after being decoded from base64) does not
   equal or exceed the sum of the key_length and salt_length, the
   receiver MUST NOT participate in the media stream and SHOULD log a
   "mkey too short" condition.  The "key||salt" value MUST appear as
   part of the srtp_mkey.

   The fourth part of the srtp_mkey is the OPTIONAL lifetime of the
   master key as measured in number of packets encrypted or
   authenticated with that key.  The default value is 48, which is 2^48
   packets encrypted with a master key according to the SRTP standard
   [srtp].  Thus, "lifetime" is specified as a power of two when
   present and MUST NOT exceed the maximum packets lifetime for the
   crypto_suite (e.g. 48 for AES Counter Mode with a 128-bit key).  If
   lifetime is too large or otherwise invalid, then the receiver MUST
   NOT participate in the media stream and SHOULD log an "invalid
   lifetime" condition. The default MAY be implicitly signaled by
   having no described value for lifetime (i.e. "//").  This is



Baugher                                                       [Page 8]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002


   convenient when the srtp crypto_key lifetime is allowed to default.
   Trailing slashes ("/") MUST follow the master key and lifetime
   fields of an SDP session-level mkey; otherwise, the receiver MUST
   NOT participate in the media stream and SHOULD log an "invalid mkey"
   condition.

   The MKI value is OPTIONAL as is its specified bit length.  "MKI" is
   the master key index associated with the srtp_mkey.  If the MKI is
   given, then the length of the MKI MUST also be given and separated
   from the MKI by a colon (":").  The MKI_length is the size of the
   MKI field in the SRTP packet and MUST be a positive multiple of 8.
   If the MKI_length is not given or if it exceeds 128 bits, then the
   receiver MUST NOT participate in the media stream and SHOULD log an
   "invalid MKI_length" condition.  If the value of the MKI is larger
   than allowed by MKI_length, then the receiver MUST NOT participate
   in the media stream and SHOULD log an "invalid MKI" condition.

4.3 SRTP Security-Session Parameters

   SRTP security descriptions apply to sessions that include a pair of
   RTP and RTCP streams; the "security-session parameters" configure
   these sessions for SRTP services.  The following parameters are
   OPTIONAL and MAY override SRTP session defaults for the SRTP or
   SRTCP streams.

4.3.1 SSRC=n

   The value n is an integer in the range of 0..2^32-1 for the RTP SSRC
   parameter.  SSRC is undefined by default. If n is invalid, the
   receiver MUST NOT participate in the media stream but SHOULD log an
   "invalid SSRC" condition.

4.3.2 ROC=n

   The value "n" is an integer in the range of 0..2^32-1 for the SRTP
   rollover counter (ROC), which  is zero by default.  The ROC MAY be
   set to a non-zero value for an ongoing RTP/SAVP stream in which the
   SRTP ROC has cycled one or more times [srtp].  The receiver of the
   SDP message SHOULD refresh the ROC value before joining a session
   "late."  How "late" is defined depends on the rate of the particular
   RTP stream and the time that has elapsed since its commencement.
   Depending on the nature of the session control, the late-joining
   receiver might need to refresh its ROC value through a unicast
   exchange or through receipt of a multicast SDP message. If n is
   invalid, then the receiver MUST NOT participate in the media stream
   but SHOULD log an "invalid ROC" condition.

4.3.3 ENCRYPTED_SRTCP

   This parameter signals that SRTCP messages are encrypted.  SRTP does
   not encrypt SRTCP messages by default.



Baugher                                                       [Page 9]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002



4.3.4 UNENCRYPTED_SRTP

   This parameter signals that SRTP messages are not encrypted.  SRTP
   encrypts SRTP messages by default.

4.3.5 UNAUTHENTICATED_SRTP

   This parameter signals that SRTP messages are not authenticated.
   SRTP authenticates SRTP messages by default (see Security
   Considerations).

4.3.6 FEC_ORDER=order

   The forward error correction values for "order" are FEC_SRTP,
   SRTP_FEC, or SPLIT [mikey].  FEC_SRTP signals that FEC is applied
   before SRTP processing on the sender and after SRTP processing on
   the receiver; FEC_SRTP is the default. SRTP_FEC is the reverse
   processing.  SPLIT signals that SRTP encryption occurs on the
   sender, followed by FEC processing, followed by SRTP authentication;
   processing is reversed on the receiver. If the receiver cannot
   recognize the order value, then the receiver MUST NOT participate in
   the media stream but SHOULD log an "invalid FEC_ORDER" condition.

5.0 Use with Offer/Answer

   Apart from an Offer/Answer exchange, a sender of an SDP a=crypto
   description cannot determine if a receiver correctly processed
   a=crypto, or if that receiver is likely to fail when receiving an
   RTP/SAVP media stream that does not use SRTP defaults.  An
   Offer/Answer exchange is the remedy that assures the SDP sender of a
   receiver's capabilities.  Offer/Answer exchange capability is
   implicitly supported in this I-D since the crypto attribute is
   associated with a media entry - the subject of the Offer/Answer
   exchange [RFC3264].  Thus, a receiver implicitly accepts or rejects
   the crypto description when it accepts or rejects the media
   description in an Offer/Answer exchange.

   It is complex, however, to negotiate cryptographic parameters
   concomitantly with media codecs or other media parameters:  Without
   special processing of a=crypto, the Offer/Answer complexity is on
   the order of the cross product of the number of crypto attributes
   and codecs that are offered.  Thus, if a media entry has three
   possible codecs in a one-of-n codec Offer and has two a=crypto
   alternatives for each, there MUST be six a=rtpmap lines instead of
   three.








Baugher                                                      [Page 10]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002


   v=0
   o=carol 28908764872 28908764872 IN IP4 100.3.6.6
   s=-
   t=0 0
   c=IN IP4 192.0.2.4
   a=sendonly
   m=audio 62986 RTP/SAVP 0 1 3 97 98 99

   a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=0
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/d0RmdmcmVCspeEc3QGZiNWpVLFJhQX1cfHAwJSoj/20/1:32
   a=rtpmap:97 PCMU/8000
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=97
     crypto_suite=aes_cm_128_hmac_sha1_80
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/NXZXeik3K2BsV2NJcTtTYl0nYVFheWl2XkdLPnwv/20/1:32

   a=rtpmap:1 1016/8000
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=1
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/bFcmQFZOanM7P3olOXpJQndmTzcjXz19WG1xODdi/20/1:32
   a=rtpmap:98 1016/8000
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=98
     crypto_suite=aes_cm_128_hmac_sha1_80
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/amlAKWt3KnpqZSR9PzFrRG0kSXNCdmk4ISw+XS1N/20/1:32

   a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=3
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/I21dQClsTndvRDAkP0NBd18rWztKJThnMkJWbS48/20/1:32
   a=rtpmap:99 GSM/8000
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=99
     crypto_suite=aes_cm_128_hmac_sha1_80
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/cndOTUBMT0k0aWtCQDBMbmxlIzA5OE4jbEp6PX0u/20/1:32

   As shown in the example, three distinct formats are offered for the
   m=audio media entry; the crypto_suite default for a=crypto is
   replaced for format descriptors 97, 98 and 99.  Thus, six a=rtpmap
   lines are needed to enumerate a pair of a=crypto alternatives for
   the Offer/Answer exchange.

   It's possible to reduce the number of codec offers by having
   a=crypto be explicitly offered in an Offer/Answer exchange.
   Multiple a=crypto attributes MAY be offered for a media stream and
   MUST appear in order of preference in a media entry: The first
   a=crypto in a media entry is most preferred and the last a=crypto is
   the least preferred.  Like any Offer, a crypto Offer MAY be rejected
   using the mechanisms of the higher-layer protocol.  Thus, zero, one
   or more a=crypto offers MAY be returned in the Answer.  An example
   Offer in an Offer/Answer capabilities exchange is shown below.







Baugher                                                      [Page 11]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002


   v=0
   o=carol 28908764872 28908764872 IN IP4 100.3.6.6
   s=-
   t=0 0
   c=IN IP4 192.0.2.4
   a=sendonly
   m=audio 0 RTP/SAVP 0 1 3
   a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=0
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/d0RmdmcmVCspeEc3QGZiNWpVLFJhQX1cfHAwJSoj/20/1:32
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=0
     crypto_suite=aes_cm_128_hmac_sha1_80
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/cndOTUBMT0k0aWtCQDBMbmxlIzA5OE4jbEp6PX0u/20/1:32

   a=rtpmap:1 1016/8000
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=1
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/NXZXeik3K2BsV2NJcTtTYl0nYVFheWl2XkdLPnwv/20/1:32
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=1
     crypto_suite=aes_cm_128_hmac_sha1_80
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/amlAKWt3KnpqZSR9PzFrRG0kSXNCdmk4ISw+XS1N/20/1:32

   a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=3
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/I21dQClsTndvRDAkP0NBd18rWztKJThnMkJWbS48/20/1:32
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=3
     crypto_suite=aes_cm_128_hmac_sha1_80
     mkey=(srtp)/16/14/bFcmQFZOanM7P3olOXpJQndmTzcjXz19WG1xODdi/20/1:32

   In this example, the Answerer selects one of two a=crypto lines by
   returning only one or prioritizing one over the other.
   Alternatively, by permitting a=crypto to appear at the SDP session
   level, we get simpler Offers and Answers.

   v=0
   o=carol 28908764872 28908764872 IN IP4 100.3.6.6
   s=-
   t=0 0
   c=IN IP4 192.0.2.4
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=1 format=2 format=3
    mkey=(srtp)/16/14/d0RmdmcmVCspeEc3QGZiNWpVLFJhQX1cfHAwJSoj/20/1:32
   a=crypto: transport=RTP/SAVP format=1 format=2 format=3
    crypto_suite=aes_cm_128_hmac_sha1_80
    mkey=(srtp)/16/14/bFcmQFZOanM7P3olOXpJQndmTzcjXz19WG1xODdi/20/1:32
   m=audio 0 RTP/SAVP 0 1 3
   a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
   a=rtpmap:1 1016/8000
   a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000

   SDP session-level crypto is elegant compared to the previous
   examples.  This Offer has two prioritized SDP session-level crypto
   alternatives for RTP/SAVP streams, which are inoperative in this SDP



Baugher                                                      [Page 12]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002


   message; the session name is "-", the start/duration times are zero
   and the media stream port is zero.  The Answerer selects one and it
   applies to all media streams that use the default.  Thus the mkey is
   inoperative and can't be used (i.e. the SRTP crypto context [srtp]
   is not defined).  The SDP session-level mkey is merely a template to
   tell the Answerer the key lengths, lifetime and indexing.  It is
   REQUIRED, however, that the final offer assign an individual mkey to
   each media stream as REQUIRED by Section 4.2.  Thus, there MUST be a
   crypto attribute with a mkey at the media-entry level for every
   media stream that gets assigned a mkey.

   SDP session-level a=crypto lines MUST NOT appear outside of an
   Offer/Answer exchange of inactive media streams [RFC3264] owing to
   the risk of a "two-time pad" situation when a shared, derived
   session key erroneously produces two identical key streams for two
   or more media streams.  This can happen during RTP SSRC collisions
   when the unique value used to generate a unique keystream is non-
   unique among two or more media streams [srtp].

   This I-D follows the conservative approach of assigning a unique
   master key to each media stream (session keys that are derived from
   distinct master keys will be unique).  By prohibiting SDP session-
   level crypto lines, each media stream is sure to have a unique
   master key.

   An alternative approach to the "two-time pad" problem generates
   unique labels to ensure unique session keystreams [mikey].  This is
   for further study and thus is SDP session-level crypto lines outside
   of an Offer/Answer exchange where the key is inactive and
   inoperative.

6.0 Security Considerations

   One needs to define SDP security descriptions for a specific SDP
   media transport for a=crypto to be useful.  The definitions SHOULD
   be specified in an Internet RFC, which has security implications
   that MUST be considered in the RFC. This section considers the SRTP
   descriptions for the RTP/SAVP transport as specified in this
   Internet Draft, which is being proposed as a standards-track RFC.

   RTP messages are vulnerable to a variety of attacks such as replay
   and forging.  SRTP message integrity and anti-replay mechanisms,
   therefore, SHOULD be used. Source authentication of unicast SRTP
   messages SHOULD be performed.  Source authentication of multicast
   SRTP messages is today non-standard and hence for further study.
   Use of the UNAUTHENTICATED_SRTP parameter. therefore, is NOT
   RECOMMENDED. SRTP supports this setting, however, for voice
   applications where authentication is implicit in the application
   [srtp].  In general, applications SHOULD NOT set
   UNAUTHENTICATED_SRTP.  Even SRTP confidentiality can be broken in
   certain circumstances when messages are unauthenticated [Bellovin].



Baugher                                                      [Page 13]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002




   Misconfigured SRTP sessions, moreover, are vulnerable to attacks on
   their encryption services when running crypto suites of Sections
   4.1.1, 4.1.2 and 4.1.3.  An SRTP encryption service is "mis-
   configured" when two or more media streams are encrypted using the
   same AES keystream.  When senders and receivers share derived
   session keys, SRTP requires that the SSRCs of session participants
   make them unique, which is violated in the case of SSRC collision:
   RTP SSRC collision reveals SRTP or SRTCP plaintext during the time
   that identical keystreams were used [srtp].  An attacker, for
   example, might collect SRTP and SRTCP messages and await a
   collision.  This attack on the AES-CM and AES-f8 encryption is
   avoided entirely when each media stream has its own unique master
   key, as this I-D REQUIRES (Section 4.2).  There is risk of attack,
   however, when an SDP media stream has an "a=sendrecv" direction
   attribute because this implies that a pair of senders are sharing a
   master key for their session encryption key; in this case, the SDP
   message SHOULD also set the a=crypto SSRC parameter (Section 4.3.1)
   for that media stream.  By implication, the SDP message that
   describes the sendrecv stream MUST NOT be a multicast SDP message,
   since the crypto SSRC parameter can set an SSRC for only one
   receiver.  For the same reason, the risk recurs when a media stream
   has an "a=sendonly" direction attribute in an multicast SDP message.
   Thus, a multicast SDP message MUST NOT use a crypto attribute for a
   media stream that has a direction attribute of a=sendrecv or
   a=sendonly.  There is no risk of sending SRTP and SRTCP using a
   single master key for recvonly, sendonly, or sendrecv media streams.
   These rules are essential for correct configuration and secure
   operation of SRTP cipher suites 4.1.1, 4.1.2 and 4.1.3.

   There is no reason to incur the complexity and computational expense
   of SRTP, however, when its key establishment is exposed to
   unauthorized parties.  In most cases, the SRTP attribute and its
   parameters are vulnerable to denial of service attacks when they are
   carried in an unauthenticated SDP message.  In some cases, the
   integrity or confidentiality of the RTP stream can be compromised.
   For example, if an attacker set UNENCRYPTED_SRTP in an SDP session
   level Offer, this could result in a receiver not decrypting the
   encrypted SRTP messages.  In the worst case, the receiver might
   itself send unencrypted SRTP and leave its data exposed to snooping.

   IPsec, TLS, S/MIME or some other data security service SHOULD be
   used to provide message authentication for SDP messages that carry
   the SRTP attribute.  Message encryption SHOULD be used when a mkey
   parameter appears in the message.  Failure to encrypt the SDP
   message containing an SRTP key renders the SRTP authentication or
   encryption service useless in practically all circumstances.
   Failure to authenticate an SDP message that carries SRTP parameters
   renders the SRTP authentication or encryption service useless in
   most practical applications.



Baugher                                                      [Page 14]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002



   When the SDP parameters cannot be carried in an encrypted and/or
   authenticated SDP message, it is RECOMMENDED that a key management
   protocol be used.  The proposed SDP key-mgmt statement allows
   authentication and encryption of the key management protocol data
   independently of the SDP message that carries it [keymgt].  The
   security of the SDP SRTP attribute, however, is as good as the data
   security protocol that protects the SDP message.  For example, if an
   IPsec security association exists between the source and destination
   endpoints, then this solution is more secure than use of the key-
   mgmt statement in an unauthenticated SDP message, which is
   vulnerable to tampering.

   There are practical cases, however, where SDP security is not end to
   end: If there is a third-party provider between the sender and
   receiver, then the data-security session might not be end to end.
   That is, one possible configuration might have an IPsec or TLS
   connection between the sender of the SDP message and the provider,
   such as a VoIP service provider, with a second secure connection
   between the provider and the receiver.  In this case, the third-
   party provider is privy to the contents of the SRTP attribute
   descriptions in the SDP message. SDP key-mgmt statement, however,
   allows true end-to-end security that is independent of the service
   provider, who often needs access to some parts of the SDP message to
   render its services.  The SRTP attribute MUST NOT be used when end-
   to-end authentication or confidentiality is needed but the SDP
   message is not secured end to end (such as the above example where a
   third-party provider maintains the security associations with the
   endpoints for the SDP message).

7.0 Acknowledgements

   This work benefited from discussions with David McGrew, Mats
   Naslund, Mike Thomas, Elisabetta Cararra, Brian Weis, Dave Oran,
   Flemming Andreasen, Bill Foster, Earl Carter, Matt Hammer and Dave
   Singer.  These people shared observations, identified errors and
   made suggestions for improving the specification.  Mats made several
   valuable suggestions on parameters and syntax that are in the
   current draft.  Dave Oran recommended the generic approach to the
   SDP media-stream security descriptions that is followed in this
   draft.  Flemming Andreasen suggested some changes to an earlier
   draft that greatly simplify this I-D.  David McGrew suggested the
   conservative approach of using unique master keys for each SDP media
   stream as followed in this I-D.




8.0 Author's Address

   Mark Baugher



Baugher                                                      [Page 15]


INTERNET-DRAFT         SDP Security Descriptions   September 30, 2002


   5510 SW Orchid Street
   Portland, Oregon
   mbaugher@rdrop.com
   +1-408-853-4418

9.0 References

   [Bellovin] Steven M. Bellovin, "Problem Areas for the IP Security
   Protocols," in Proceedings of the Sixth Usenix Unix Security
   Symposium, pp. 1-16, San Jose, CA, July 1996.

   [keymgt] J.Arkko, E.Carrara, F.Lindholm, M.Naslund, K. Norrman, Key
   Management Extensions for SDP and RTSP, June 2002,
   http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-kmgmt-ext-
   05.txt, Work in Progress

   [mikey] J.Arkko, E.Carrara, F.Lindholm, M.Naslund, K. Norrman,
   MIKEY: Multimedia Internet KEYing, July 2002,
   http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-msec-mikey-03.txt,
   Work in Progress

   [RFC1889] H.Schulzrinne, S.Casner, R.Fredrick, V.Jacobson, RTP: A
   Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications, January 1996,
   http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1889.txt

   [RFC2104] H.Krawczyk, M.Bellare, R.Canetti, HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for
   Message Authentication, November 1997, ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-
   notes/rfc2104.txt

   [RFC2327] M.Handley, V.Jacobson, SDP: Session Description Protocol,
   April 1998, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2327.txt

   [RFC3264] J.Rosenberg, H.Schulzrinne, An Offer/Answer Model with the
   Session Description Protocol (SDP), June 2202, ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-
   notes/rfc3264.txt

   [skeme] H.Krawczyk, SKEME: A Versatile Secure Key Exchange Mechanism
   for the Internet, ISOC Secure Networks and Distributed Systems
   Symposium, San Diego, 1996.

   [srtp] M.Baugher, R.Blom, E.Carrara, D.McGrew, M.Naslund, K.Norrman,
   D. Oran, The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol, June 2002,
   http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-05.txt,
   Work in Progress










Baugher                                                      [Page 16]