VPIM Working Group                                        Glenn Parsons
     Internet Draft                                          Janusz Maruszak
     Document: <draft-ema-vpim-clid-02.txt>                  Nortel Networks
     Category: Standards Track                                     June 2001
     
     
                 Calling Line Identification for Voice Mail Messages
     
     
     Status of this Memo
     
        This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all
        provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
     
        Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task
        Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups
        may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-
        Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be
        updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is
        inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite
        them other than as "work in progress."
        The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
        http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
        The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
        http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
     
     
     
     Abstract
     
        This document describes a method for identifying the originating
        calling party for a stored voice mail message.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Parsons & Marusak         Expires: 20/01/02                         1
     
                          Calling Line Identification            June 2001
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Table of Contents
     
     
      1. Abstract........................................................3
      2. Conventions used in this document...............................3
      3. Introduction....................................................3
      4. Calling Line Identification Field...............................4
         4.1 Internal Call...............................................4
         4.2 External Call...............................................4
      5. Caller Name Field...............................................5
      6. Formal Syntax...................................................5
         6.1 Calling Line Identification Syntax..........................6
         6.2 Caller Name Syntax..........................................6
         6.3 Example.....................................................6
      7. Security Considerations.........................................6
      8. References......................................................6
      9. Acknowledgments.................................................8
      10. Author's Addresses.............................................8
      11. Full Copyright Statement.......................................9
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Parsons & Marusak         Expires: 20/01/02                         2
     
                          Calling Line Identification            June 2001
     
     
     
     
     
     1. Abstract
     
        This document describes a method for identifying the originating
        calling party for a stored voice mail message.
     
     
     2. Conventions used in this document
     
        The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
        document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119.
     
     
     3. Introduction
     
        There is currently a need for a mechanism to identify the originating
        party of a voice mail message, outside of the "FROM" header
        information.  The telephone number and name of the caller are typically
        available from the telephone network, but there is no obvious header
        field to store this in an Internet Mail message.
     
        This information is intended for use when the VPIM message format is
        used for storing "Call Answer" voice messages in an Internet Mail
        message store, i.e. the calling party leaves a voice message for the
        recipient, who was unable to answer the call.
     
        [VPIMV2R2] suggests the originating number be included as an Internet
        address, using the first method shown below. There are several other
        ways to store this information, but they all involve some manipulation
        of the "From" field.  For example:
     
           1. From: "416 555 1234" <non-mail-user@host>
           2. From: "John Doe" <4165551234@host>
           3. From:  unknown:;
     
        As a result, it is useful to be able to store the calling party's name
        and number as presented to the called party without manipulation.  This
        would allow future generation of the proper Internet address, and also
        display of this information to the recipient.  Note that there is no
        requirement to store meta-data (e.g., type of number, presentation
        restricted) as this information is not presented to the called party
        and is generally not available to voice mail systems.  The intent is to
        store the information available to an analog (non-ISDN) phone (e.g.,
        per [T1.401] in North America).
     
        [RFC2076] currently lists "phone" as an Internet message header which
        would hold the originating party's telephone number, but it is listed
        as "non-standard", i.e. usage of this header is not generally
        recommended. It also has no defined format, making the information
        unparsable. There is no similar entry for the originator's name.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Parsons & Marusak         Expires: 20/01/02                         3
     
                          Calling Line Identification            June 2001
     
     
     
     
     
        It is proposed that two new message header fields be included to hold
        this information, namely the Calling Line Identification ("Caller-ID"),
        and Caller Name ("Caller-Name").
     
     
     4. Calling Line Identification Field
     
        The Calling Line Identification header ("Caller-ID") is to hold
        sufficient information for the recipient to call back, or reply to, the
        sender of the message.  This leads to two distinct possibilities:
        internal and external calling.
     
        Note that for both possibilities, this field MUST contain only the
        digits of the number and MUST be representable using the American
        Standard Code for Information Interchange [ASCII] character set; it
        does not include any separating character (e.g. "-").
     
     
     4.1 Internal Call
     
        For an internal call (e.g. between two extensions within the same
        company), it is sufficient to relay only the extension of the calling
        party, based on the company dialing plan.
     
     
     4.2 External Call
     
        For an international call, the calling partyis number must be the full
        international number as described in [E.164], i.e. Country Code (CC),
        National Destination Code (NDC) and Subscriber Number (SN).  Other
        information, such as prefixes or symbols (e.g. "+"), MUST NOT be
        included.  This requires provisioning for up to 15 digits.
     
        For a call within North America, it is also suggested to support 15
        digits per [T1.625].  However, some service providers may only support
        10 digits as described in [T1.401] and [GR-31-CORE].  Though it is
        desirable that an international number NOT be truncated to 10 digits if
        it contains more, it is recognized that this will happen due to
        limitations of various systems.
     
        Also note that the date and time can be included with the calling
        partyis telephone number per [T1.401].  This MAY be used, as there is
        an existing "Date" Internet header to hold this information.  It is a
        local implementation decision whether this time or the local system
        time be recorded in the "Date" header.
     
        Note that the other defined fields available to non-analog systems
        (e.g., subaddress, redirecting number), as well as the meta-data, are
        not intended to be stored in this header.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Parsons & Marusak         Expires: 20/01/02                         4
     
                          Calling Line Identification            June 2001
     
     
     
     
     
     5. Caller Name Field
     
        The name of the person sending the message is also important.  If
        available, it is to be included whether the call is internal or
        external.  This field may not be available on an international call.
     
        Further, the exact format for this field is typically a service
        provider option per [T1.641].  It is possible for the calleris name to
        be sent in one of several character sets depending on the service
        provider signaling transport (e.g., ISDN-UP, SCCP, TCAP).  These
        include:
           1) International Reference Alphabet (IRA), formerly know as
             International Alphabet No.5 or IA5 [T.50]
           2) Latin Alphabet No. 1 [8859-1]
           3) American National Standard Code for Information Interchange
             [ASCII]
           4) Character Sets for the International Teletex Service [T.61]
     
        Of these, the IRA and T.61 character set contains a number of options
        that help specify national and application oriented versions.  If there
        is no agreement between parties to use these options, then the 7-bit
        character set in which the graphical characters of IRA, T.61 and ASCII
        are coded exactly the same, will be assumed.  Further, the 7-bit
        graphical characters of [8859-1] are the same as in [ASCII].
     
        Note that for delivery to customer equipment in North America, the
        calling name MUST be presented in ASCII per [T1.401].
     
        As a result, for the caller name header defined in this document,
        characters are represented with ASCII characters.  However, if a name
        is received that cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII, it may be stored
        using its native character set as defined in [RFC2047].
     
        In the networks, the length of the name field MUST NOT exceed 50
        characters, as defined in [T1.641].  However, service providers may
        chose to limit this further to 15 characters for delivery to customer
        equipment, e.g., [T1.401] and [GR-1188-CORE].
     
     
     6. Formal Syntax
     
        Both Calling Line Identification and Caller Line follow the syntax
        specification using the augmented Backus-Naur Form (BNF) as described
        in [RFC2234].  While the semantics of these headers are defined in
        sections 4 and 5, the syntax uses the 'unstructured' token defined in
        [RFC2822]:
     
           unstructured = *([FWS] utext) [FWS]
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Parsons & Marusak         Expires: 20/01/02                         5
     
                          Calling Line Identification            June 2001
     
     
     
     
     
     6.1 Calling Line Identification Syntax
     
           "Caller-ID" ":" unstructured CRLF
     
     
     6.2 Caller Name Syntax
     
           "Caller-Name" ":" unstructured CRLF
     
     
     6.3 Example
     
            To: +19725551212@vm1.mycompany.com
            Caller-ID: 6137684087
            Caller-Name: Derrick Dunne
     
     
     7. Security Considerations
     
        There are a few scenarios that must be considered.  The first is
        mentioned in section 2.2 - the truncation of an international number to
        10 digits.  This could result in a misinterpretation of the resulting
        number.  For instance, an international number (e.g. from Ireland) of
        the form "353 91 73 3307" could be truncated to "53 91 73 3307" if
        received in North America, and interpreted as "539 112 3456" - a
        seemingly "North American" style number.  Thus leaving the recipient
        with the incorrect information to reply to the message.
     
        The second scenario is the possibility of sending an internal extension
        to an external recipient when a Call Answer message is forwarded.  This
        poses two problems, the recipient is given the wrong phone number, and
        the company's dialing plan could be exposed.
     
        The final concern deals with exercising character options that are
        available in coding the Calling Name field. An international system may
        send a message with coding options that are not available on the
        receiving system. Thus giving the recipient an incorrect Caller Name.
     
        Note that unlisted and restricted numbers are not a concern as these
        header fields are defined to contain what the called party would see
        (e.g., 'Private Name'), as opposed to the complete details exchanged
        between service providers.
     
     
     8. References
     
        [VPIMV2R2] Vaudreuil, Greg, Parsons, Glenn, "Voice Profile for Internet
        Mail, version 2", <draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-03.txt>, June 2001.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Parsons & Marusak         Expires: 20/01/02                         6
     
                          Calling Line Identification            June 2001
     
     
     
     
     
        [RFC2047] K. Moore, "MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part
        Three:  Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text", RFC 2047,
        November 1996
     
        [RFC2076] Palme, "Common Internet Message Headers", RFC 2076, February
        1997
     
        [RFC2234] Crocker, D. and Overell, P.(Editors), "Augmented BNF for
        Syntax Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, Internet Mail Consortium and
        Demon Internet Ltd., November 1997
     
        [RFC2822] Resnick, P., "Internet Message Format", RFC 2822, April 2001.
     
        [E.164] ITU-T Recommendation E.164 (1997), "The international public
        telecommunication numbering plan"
     
        [T.50] ITU-T Recommendation T.50 (1992), "International Reference
        Alphabet (IRA)"
     
        [T.61] CCITT Recommendation T.61 (1988) (Withdrawn), "Character
        Repertoire and Coded Chaacter Sets for the International Teletex
        Service"
     
        [8859-1] ISO/IEC International Standard 8859-1 (1998), Information
        Technology n 8-bit single-byte coded graphic character sets n Part 1:
        Latin Alphabet No. 1
     
        [ASCII] American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Coded Character
        Set - 7-Bit American National Standard Code for Information
        Interchange, ANSI X3.4, 1986.
     
        [T1.401] American National Standards Institute (ANSI),
        Telecommunications n Network-to-Customer Installation Interfaces n
        Analog Voicegrade Switched Access Lines with Calling Number Delivery,
        Calling Name Delivery, or Visual Message-Waiting Indicator Features,
        ANSI T1.6401.03-1998
     
        [T1.625] American National Standards Institute (ANSI),
        Telecommunications - Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) n
        Calling Line identification Presentation and Restriction Supplementary
        Services, ANSI T1.625-1993
     
        [T1.641] American National Standards Institute (ANSI),
        Telecommunications - Calling Name Identification Presentation, ANSI
        T1.641-1995
     
        [GR-1188-CORE] Telcordia Technologies, "CLASS Feature: Calling Name
        Delivery Generic Requirements", GR-1188-CORE, Issue 2, December 2000
     
        [GR-31-CORE] Telcordia Technologies, "CLASS Feature: Calling Number
        Delivery", GR-31-CORE, Issue 1, June 2000
     
     
     
     
     
     Parsons & Marusak         Expires: 20/01/02                         7
     
                          Calling Line Identification            June 2001
     
     
     
     
     
     9. Acknowledgments
     
        The previous authors of drafts of this document were Derrick Dunne and
        Jason Collins. The current authors would like to thank Derrick and
        Jason for their contributions.
     
     
     10. Author's Addresses
     
        Glenn Parsons
        Nortel Networks
        P.O. Box 3511, Station C
        Ottawa, ON K1Y 4H7
        Phone: +1-613-763-7582
        Email: gparsons@nortelnetworks.com
     
        Janusz Maruszak
        Nortel Networks
        522 University Avenue
        Toronto, ON M5G 1W7
        Phone: +1-416-597-7517
        Email: marusj@nortelnetworks.com
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Parsons & Marusak         Expires: 20/01/02                         8
     
                          Calling Line Identification            June 2001
     
     
     
     
     
     11. Full Copyright Statement
     
        Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001).  All Rights Reserved.
     
        This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
        others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or
        assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and
        distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind,
        provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
        included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
        document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the
        copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
        Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing
        Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined
        in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to
        translate it into languages other than English.
     
        The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
        revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
     
        This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
        "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
        TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT
        NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL
        NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR
        FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Parsons & Marusak         Expires: 20/01/02                         9