ECRIT                                                          R. George
Internet-Draft                                                    Q. Sun
Intended status: Standards Track                     Huawei Technologies
Expires: August 28, 2009                                  H. Schulzrinne
                                                     Columbia University
                                                       February 24, 2009


   Civic Location Format Extension for Utility and Lamp Post Numbers
                    draft-george-ecrit-lamp-post-00

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 28, 2009.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.

   This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
   Contributions published or made publicly available before November



George, et al.           Expires August 28, 2009                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft       Civic Location Format Extension       February 2009


   10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
   material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
   modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
   Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
   the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
   outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
   not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
   it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
   than English.

Abstract

   This document describes an extension to civic location format and
   adds new element PN (pole number).  PN carries pole number
   information which can identify a civic location.


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

   2.  Terminology Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

   3.  Additional Civic Address Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

   4.  Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

     7.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

     7.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5













George, et al.           Expires August 28, 2009                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft       Civic Location Format Extension       February 2009


1.  Introduction

   In many cities in China, utility and lamp posts carry a unique
   identifier, which we call a pole number in this document.  In some
   countries, the label on the lamp post also carries the local
   emergency service number, such as "110", encouraging callers to use
   the pole number to identify their location.  This method is initially
   provided and implemented in China by Shenzhen police department.
   (One suspects that this is particularly useful in cities where street
   naming and numbering systems make it difficult to accurately identify
   locations.)

   The pole number is also useful to report broken street lights.  The
   major disadvantage is that callers would have to enter the pole
   number manually, although it may be possible in the future to simply
   point a camera phone at the number and have it recognize the number
   using pattern recognition.

   In this document, we define an extension of the civic address format
   [RFC XXXX] to carry such pole number information.  The following
   figure is a diagram for this kind of lamp post number. "110" in the
   circle is emergency service number or PSAP.


                          _.-----,===.
                         | |    (''''')
                         | |     `---'
                         | |
                         | |               ,---------,
                         | |    ,---,      |Emergency|
                         | |   /|,-.|----->| Number  |
                         | |  / |110|      '---------'
                         | | /  |`-'|
                         |_|/   | 2 |      ,---------,
                         | |    | 1 |      |Lamp Post|
                         | |    | 2 |----->| Number  |
                         |-|    | 1 |      '---------'
                         | |\   | 0 |
                         | | \  | 1 |
                         | |  \ | 4 |
                         | |   \|,,,|
                   _     | |
                    ``-..|.|
                           ``--.._
                                  `'--.._


                Lamp post with emergency number.



George, et al.           Expires August 28, 2009                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft       Civic Location Format Extension       February 2009


2.  Terminology Used in This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].


3.  Additional Civic Address Type

   [RFC4776] and [RFC5139] provides a full set of parameters that may be
   used to describe a civic location.  Specifically, [RFC4776] lists
   several civic address types (CAtypes) that require support in the
   formal PIDF-LO definition that are not in [RFC4119].

   The new element, PN (pole number), is used to support Lamp Post
   number in street addresses.  The pole number can consist of any
   combination of letters and digits.  Punctuation characters and
   embedded spaces are ignored; lower and upper case letters are treated
   as equivalent.



   +-----------+--------+-------------------------------+--------------+
   | New Field | CAtype | Description                   | Example      |
   +-----------+--------+-------------------------------+--------------+
   | PN        |   40   | lamp post number              | 2121014      |
   +-----------+--------+-------------------------------+--------------+



4.  Example



              <civicAddress xml:lang="en-AU"
                xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:civicAddr">
                <country> CN </country>
                <A1> GD </A1>
                <A3> Shenzhen </A3>
                <A4> Bantian </A4>
                <RD> Wuhe </RD>
                <LMK> Bai Cao Yuan </LMK>
                <LOC> Front Gate </LOC>
                <NAM> Video Rental Store </NAM>
                <PC> 518129 </PC>
                <PN> 2121014 </PN>
              </civicAddress>




George, et al.           Expires August 28, 2009                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft       Civic Location Format Extension       February 2009


5.  Security Considerations

   TBD


6.  IANA Considerations

   TBD


7.  References

7.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

7.2.  Informative References

   [RFC3693]  Cuellar, J., Morris, J., Mulligan, D., Peterson, J., and
              J. Polk, "Geopriv Requirements", RFC 3693, February 2004.

   [RFC4119]  Peterson, J., "A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object
              Format", RFC 4119, December 2005.

   [RFC4776]  Schulzrinne, H., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
              (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses
              Configuration Information", RFC 4776, November 2006.

   [RFC5139]  Thomson, M. and J. Winterbottom, "Revised Civic Location
              Format for Presence Information Data Format Location
              Object (PIDF-LO)", RFC 5139, February 2008.


Authors' Addresses

   Robins George
   Huawei Technologies
   Huawei Base, Bantian, Longgang District
   Shenzhen, Guangdong  518129
   P. R. China

   Phone: +86-755-28788314
   Email: robinsg@huawei.com







George, et al.           Expires August 28, 2009                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft       Civic Location Format Extension       February 2009


   Qian Sun
   Huawei Technologies
   Huawei Base, Bantian, Longgang District
   Shenzhen, Guangdong  518129
   P. R. China

   Phone: +86-755-28787351
   Email: sunqian@huawei.com


   Henning Schulzrinne
   Columbia University
   Department of Computer Science
   450 Computer Science Building, New York  NY, 10027
   US

   Phone: +1 212 939 7004
   Email: hgs@cs.columbia.edu
   URI:   http://www.cs.columbia.edu
































George, et al.           Expires August 28, 2009                [Page 6]