CDNI J. Seedorf
Internet-Draft HFT Stuttgart - Univ. of Applied Sciences
Intended status: Standards Track Y. Yang
Expires: September 19, 2018 Tongji/Yale
K. Ma
Ericsson
J. Peterson
Neustar
X. Lin
Tongji
March 18, 2018
Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Request Routing: CDNI
Footprint and Capabilities Advertisement using ALTO
draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-02
Abstract
The Content Delivery Networks Interconnection (CDNI) WG is defining a
set of protocols to inter-connect CDNs, to achieve multiple goals
such as extending the reach of a given CDN to areas that are not
covered by that particular CDN. One component that is needed to
achieve the goal of CDNI is the CDNI Request Routing Footprint &
Capabilities Advertisement interface (FCI) [RFC7336]. [RFC8008] has
defined precisely the semantics of FCI and provided guidelines on the
FCI protocol, but the exact protocol is explicitly outside the scope
of that document. In this document, we define an FCI protocol using
the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) protocol.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 19, 2018.
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Semantics of FCI Advertisement . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. ALTO Background and Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3. CDNI FCI Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1. Media Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.2. HTTP Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3. Accept Input Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.4. Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.5. Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.6. Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.7. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.7.1. IRD Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.7.2. Basic Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.7.3. Incremental Updates Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4. CDNI FCI Map Using ALTO Network Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.1. Introduce Footprint Type: altonetworkmap . . . . . . . . 15
4.2. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4.2.1. IRD Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4.2.2. ALTO Network Map for CDNI FCI Footprints Example . . 16
4.2.3. ALTO Network Map Footprints in CDNI FCI Map . . . . . 16
4.2.4. Incremental Updates Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5. Filtered CDNI FCI Map Using Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.1. Media Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.2. HTTP Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.3. Accept Input Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.4. Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.5. Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.6. Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.7. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5.7.1. IRD Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
5.7.2. Basic Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5.7.3. Incremental Updates Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6. Query Footprint Properties using ALTO Unified Property
Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
6.1. Representing Footprint Objects as Unified Property Map
entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
6.1.1. ASN Domain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
6.1.2. COUNTRYCODE Domain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
6.2. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
6.2.1. IRD Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
6.2.2. Property Map Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
6.2.3. Filtered Property Map Example . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
6.2.4. Incremental Updates Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
7.1. CDNI Metadata Footprint Type Registry . . . . . . . . . . 30
7.2. ALTO Entity Domain Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
7.3. ALTO CDNI FCI Property Type Registry . . . . . . . . . . 31
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
9. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
1. Introduction
Many Network Service Providers (NSPs) are currently considering or
have already started to deploy Content Delivery Networks (CDNs)
within their networks. As a consequence of this development, there
is a need for interconnecting these local CDNs. Content Delivery
Networks Interconnection (CDNI) has the goal of standardizing
protocols to enable such interconnection of CDNs [RFC6707].
The CDNI problem statement [RFC6707] defines four interfaces to be
standardized within the IETF for CDN interconnection:
o CDNI Request Routing Interface
o CDNI Metadata Interface
o CDNI Logging Interface
o CDNI Control Interface
The main purpose of the CDNI Request Routing Interface is described
in [RFC6707] as follows: "The CDNI Request Routing interface enables
a Request Routing function in an Upstream CDN to query a Request
Routing function in a Downstream CDN to determine if the Downstream
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
CDN is able (and willing) to accept the delegated Content Request.
It also allows the Downstream CDN to control what should be returned
to the User Agent in the redirection message by the upstream Request
Routing function." On a high level, the scope of the CDNI Request
Routing Interface, therefore, contains two main tasks:
o determining if the downstream CDN (dCDN) is willing to accept a
delegated content request;
o redirecting the content request coming from an upstream CDN (uCDN)
to the proper entry point or entity in the downstream CDN.
Correspondingly, the request routing interface is broadly divided
into two functionalities:
o CDNI Footprint & Capabilities Advertisement interface (FCI): the
advertisement from a dCDN to a uCDN or a query from a uCDN to a
dCDN for the uCDN to decide whether to redirect particular user
requests to that dCDN;
o CDNI Request Routing Redirection interface (RI): the synchronous
operation of actually redirecting a user request.
This document focuses solely on CDNI FCI, with a goal to specify a
new Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) [RFC7285] service
called "CDNI FCI Map Service", to transport and update CDNI FCI
objects, which are defined in a separate document in [RFC8008].
Throughout this document, we use the terminology for CDNI defined in
[RFC6707] and [RFC8008].
2. Background
The design of CDNI FCI transport using ALTO depends on understanding
of both FCI semantics and ALTO. Hence, we start with a review of
both.
2.1. Semantics of FCI Advertisement
The CDNI document on "Footprint and Capabilities Semantics" [RFC8008]
defines the semantics for the CDNI FCI. It thus provides guidance on
what Footprint and Capabilities mean in a CDNI context and how a
protocol solution should in principle look like. The definitions in
[RFC8008] depend on [RFC8006]. Here we briefly summarize key related
points of [RFC8008] and [RFC8006]. For a detailed discussion, the
reader is referred to the RFCs.
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
o Footprint and capabilities are tied together and cannot be
interpreted independently from each other. In such cases, i.e.
where capabilities must be expressed on a per footprint basis, it
may be beneficial to combine footprint and capabilities
advertisement. [RFC8008] integrates footprint and capabilities
with an approach of "capabilities with footprint restrictions".
o Given that a large part of Footprint and Capabilities
Advertisement will actually happen in contractual agreements, the
semantics of CDNI Footprint and Capabilities advertisement refer
to answering the following question: what exactly still needs to
be advertised by the CDNI FCI? For instance, updates about
temporal failures of part of a footprint can be useful information
to convey via the CDNI request routing interface. Such
information would provide updates on information previously agreed
in contracts between the participating CDNs. In other words, the
CDNI FCI is a means for a dCDN to provide changes/updates
regarding a footprint and/or capabilities it has prior agreed to
serve in a contract with a uCDN. Hence, server push and
incremental encoding will be necessary techniques.
o Multiple types of footprints are defined in [RFC8006]:
* List of ISO Country Codes
* List of AS numbers
* Set of IP-prefixes
A "set of IP-prefixes" must be able to contain full IP addresses,
i.e., a /32 for IPv4 and a /128 for IPv6, and also IP prefixes
with an arbitrary prefix length. There must also be support for
multiple IP address versions, i.e., IPv4 and IPv6, in such a
footprint.
o For all of these mandatory-to-implement footprint types,
footprints can be viewed as constraints for delegating requests to
a dCDN: A dCDN footprint advertisement tells the uCDN the
limitations for delegating a request to the dCDN. For IP prefixes
or ASN(s), the footprint signals to the uCDN that it should
consider the dCDN a candidate only if the IP address of the
request routing source falls within the prefix set (or ASN,
respectively). The CDNI specifications do not define how a given
uCDN determines what address ranges are in a particular ASN.
Similarly, for country codes, a uCDN should only consider the dCDN
a candidate if it covers the country of the request routing
source. The CDNI specifications do not define how a given uCDN
determines the country of the request routing source. Multiple
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
footprint constraints are additive, i.e. the advertisement of
different types of footprint narrows the dCDN candidacy
cumulatively.
o The following capabilities are defined as "base" capabilities,
i.e. ones that are needed in any case and therefore constitute
mandatory capabilities to be supported by the CDNI FCI:
* Delivery Protocol (e.g., HTTP vs. RTMP)
* Acquisition Protocol (for acquiring content from a uCDN)
* Redirection Mode (e.g., DNS Redirection vs. HTTP Redirection as
discussed in [RFC7336])
* Capabilities related to CDNI Logging (e.g., supported logging
mechanisms)
* Capabilities related to CDNI Metadata (e.g., authorization
algorithms or support for proprietary vendor metadata)
2.2. ALTO Background and Benefits
Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) [RFC7285] is an
approach for guiding the resource provider selection process in
distributed applications that can choose among several candidate
resources providers to retrieve a given resource. By conveying
network layer (topology) information, an ALTO server can provide
important information to "guide" the resource provider selection
process in distributed applications. Usually, it is assumed that an
ALTO server conveys information these applications cannot measure
themselves [RFC5693].
Originally, ALTO was motivated by the huge amount of cross-ISP
traffic generated by P2P applications [RFC5693]. Recently, however,
ALTO is also being considered for improving the request routing in
CDNs [I-D.jenkins-alto-cdn-use-cases]. In this context, it has also
been proposed to use ALTO for selecting an entry-point in a
downstream NSP's network (see section 3.4 "CDN delivering Over-The-
Top of a NSP's network" in [I-D.jenkins-alto-cdn-use-cases]). Also,
the CDNI problem statement explicitly mentions ALTO as a candidate
protocol for "actual algorithms for selection of CDN or Surrogate by
Request-Routing systems" [RFC6707].
The following reasons make ALTO a suitable candidate protocol for
downstream CDN selection as part of CDNI request routing and in
particular for an FCI protocol:
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
o CDN request routing is done at the application layer. ALTO is a
protocol specifically designed to improve application layer
traffic (and application layer connections among hosts on the
Internet) by providing additional information to applications that
these applications could not easily retrieve themselves. For
CDNI, this is exactly the case: a uCDN wants to improve
application layer CDN request routing by using dedicated
information (provided by a dCDN) that the uCDN could not easily
obtain otherwise.
o The semantics of an ALTO network map are an exact match for the
needed information to convey a footprint by a downstream CDN, in
particular if such a footprint is being expressed by IP-prefix
ranges.
o Security: ALTO maps can be signed and hence provide inherent
integrity protection (see Section 8).
o RESTful-Design: The ALTO protocol has undergone extensive
revisions in order to provide a RESTful design regarding the
client-server interaction specified by the protocol. A CDNI FCI
interface based on ALTO would inherit this RESTful design.
o Error-handling: The ALTO protocol has undergone extensive
revisions in order to provide sophisticated error-handling, in
particular regarding unexpected cases. A CDNI FCI interface based
on ALTO would inherit this thought-through and mature error-
handling.
o Filtered network map: The ALTO Map Filtering Service (see
[RFC7285] for details) would allow a uCDN to query only for parts
of an ALTO map.
o Server-initiated Notifications and Incremental Updates: In case
the footprint or the capabilities of a downstream CDN change
abruptly (i.e. unexpectedly from the perspective of an upstream
CDN), server-initiated notifications would enable a dCDN to
directly inform an upstream CDN about such changes. Consider the
case where - due to failure - part of the footprint of the dCDN is
not functioning, i.e. the CDN cannot serve content to such clients
with reasonable QoS. Without server-initiated notifications, the
uCDN might still use a very recent network and cost map from dCDN,
and therefore redirect requests to dCDN which it cannot serve.
Similarly, the possibility for incremental updates would enable
efficient conveyance of the aforementioned (or similar) status
changes by the dCDN to the uCDN. The newest design of ALTO
supports server pushed incremental updates
[I-D.ietf-alto-incr-update-sse].
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
o Content Availability on Hosts: A dCDN might want to express CDN
capabilities in terms of certain content types (e.g. codecs/
formats, or content from certain content providers). The new
endpoint property for ALTO would enable a dCDN to make such
information available to an upstream CDN. This would enable a
uCDN to determine if a given dCDN actually has the capabilities
for a given request with respect to the type of content requested.
o Resource Availability on Hosts or Links: The capabilities on links
(e.g. maximum bandwidth) or caches (e.g. average load) might be
useful information for an upstream CDN for optimized downstream
CDN selection. For instance, if a uCDN receives a streaming
request for content with a certain bitrate, it needs to know if it
is likely that a dCDN can fulfill such stringent application-level
requirements (i.e. can be expected to have enough consistent
bandwidth) before it redirects the request. In general, if ALTO
could convey such information via new endpoint properties, it
would enable more sophisticated means for downstream CDN selection
with ALTO.
3. CDNI FCI Map
The ALTO protocol is based on an ALTO Information Service Framework
which consists of several services, where all ALTO services are
"provided through a common transport protocol, messaging structure
and encoding, and transaction model" [RFC7285]. The ALTO protocol
specification [RFC7285] defines several such services, e.g. the ALTO
map service.
This document defines a new ALTO Map Service called "CDNI FCI Map
Service" which conveys JSON objects of media type "application/cdni".
This media type and JSON object format is defined in [RFC8006] and
[RFC8008]; this document specifies how to transport such JSON objects
via the ALTO protocol with the ALTO "CDNI FCI Map Service". Given
that the "CDNI FCI Map Service" is very similar in structure to the
two already defined map services (network maps and cost maps), the
specification of CDNI FCI Map below uses the same specification
structure for Cost Map specification in Section 11.2.3 of [RFC7285]
when specifying cost maps.
3.1. Media Type
The media type of the CDNI FCI Map is "application/cdni".
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
3.2. HTTP Method
A CDNI FCI map resource is requested using the HTTP GET method.
3.3. Accept Input Parameters
None.
3.4. Capabilities
None.
3.5. Uses
The resource ID of the resource based on which the CDNI FCI map will
be defined. For example, if a CDNI FCI map depends on a network map,
the resource ID of the network map MUST be included in "Uses" field.
Please see Section 4. If the CDNI FCI map does not depend on any
other resources, "Uses" field MUST NOT appear.
3.6. Response
If a CDNI FCI map does not depend on other resources, the "meta"
field of a CDNI FCI map response MUST include the "vtag" field
defined in Section 10.3 of [RFC7285], which provides the version tag
of the retrieved CDNI FCI map. If a CDNI FCI map response depends on
a resource such a network map, it MUST include the "dependent-vtags"
field, whose value is an array to indicate the version tag of the
resource used, where the resource is specified in "uses" of the IRD.
The current defined dependent resource is only network map, and the
usage of it is described in Section 4. The data component of an ALTO
CDNI FCI map response is named "cdnifci-map", which is a JSON object
of type CDNIFCIMapData:
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
object {
CDNIFCIMapData cdnifci-map;
} InfoResourceCDNIFCIMap : ResponseEntityBase;
object {
CDNIFCIObject capabilities<1..*>;
} CDNIFCIMapData
object {
JSONString capability-type;
JSONValue capability-value;
CDNIFCIFootprint footprints<0..*>;
} CDNIFCIObject;
object {
JSONString footprint-type;
JSONString footprint-value<1..*>;
} CDNIFCIFootprint
Specifically, a CDNIFCIMapData object is a JSON object, and it
includes only one property "capabilities" and whose value is an array
of CDNIFCIobject objects. The CDNIFCIObject object may contain an
optional list of CDNIFCIFootprint objects. The FCIFootprint object
specifies a "footprint-type" which identifies the contents and
encoding of the individual footprint entries contained in the
associated "footprint-value" array. Please refer to [RFC8006] and
[RFC8008] for formal definitions of capabilities and footprints.
The ALTO server MUST interpret FCIfootprint objects appearing
multiple times as if they appeared only once. Footprint restriction
information MAY be specified using multiple different footprint-
types. If no footprint restriction list is specified (or an empty
list is specified), it MUST be understood that all footprint types
are reset to "global" coverage.
Note: Further optimization of the footprint object to provide quality
information for a given footprint is certainly possible, however, it
is not necessary for the basic interconnection of CDNs. The ability
to transfer quality information in capabilities advertisements may be
desirable and is noted here for completeness, however, the specifics
of such mechanisms are outside the scope of this document.
Multiple CDNIFCIObject objects with the same capability type are
allowed within a given CDNI FCI Map response as long as the
capability option footprint-value do not overlap, i.e., a given
capability option value MUST NOT show up in multiple CDNIFCIObject
objects with the same capability type. If multiple CDNIFCIObject
objects for a given capability type exist, those capability objects
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
MUST have different footprint restrictions. Capability objects of a
given capability type with identical footprint restrictions MUST be
combined into a single capability object.
3.7. Examples
3.7.1. IRD Example
Below is an example IRD annoucing two network maps, one CDNI FCI map
without dependency, one CDNI FCI map depending on a network map, one
filtered CDNI FCI map, one unified property map including "cdni-fci-
capabilities" as its entities' property, one filtered unified
property map including "cdni-fci-capabilities" and "pid" as its
entities' properties and two update stream services (one for updating
CDNI FCI maps, and the other for updating property maps).
GET /directory HTTP/1.1
Host: alto.example.com
Accept: application/alto-directory+json,application/alto-error+json
{
"meta" : { ... },
"resources": {
"my-default-network-map": {
"uri" : "http://alto.example.com/networkmap",
"media-type" : "application/alto-networkmap+json"
},
"my-eu-netmap" : {
"uri" : "http://alto.example.com/myeunetmap",
"media-type" : "application/alto-networkmap+json"
},
"my-default-cdnifci-map": {
"uri" : "http://alto.example.com/cdnifcimap",
"media-type": "application/cdni"
},
"my-filtered-cdnifci-map" : {
"uri" : "http://alto.example.com/cdnifcimap/filtered",
"media-type" : "application/cdni",
"accepts" : "application/alto-cdnifcimapfilter+json",
"uses" : [ "my-default-cdnifci-map" ]
},
"my-cdnifci-map-with-network-map-footprints": {
"uri" : "http://alto.example.com/networkcdnifcimap",
"media-type" : "application/cdni",
"uses" : [ "my-eu-netmap" ]
},
"cdnifci-property-map" : {
"uri" : "http://alto.example.com/propmap/full/cdnifci",
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
"media-type" : "application/alto-propmap+json",
"capabilities" : {
"domain-types" : [ "ipv4", "ipv6", "coutrycode", "asn" ],
"prop-types" : [ "cdni-fci-capabilities" ]
}
},
"filtered-cdnifci-property-map" : {
"uri" : "http://alto.example.com/propmap/lookup/cdnifci-pid",
"media-type" : "application/alto-propmap+json",
"accpets" : "application/alto-propmapparams+json",
"capabilities" : {
"domain-types" : [ "ipv4", "ipv6", "coutrycode", "asn" ],
"prop-types" : [ "cdni-fci-capabilities", "pid" ]
}
},
"update-my-cdni-fci-maps" : {
"uri": "http:///alto.example.com/updates/cdnifcimaps",
"media-type" : "text/event-stream",
"accepts" : "application/alto-updatestreamparams+json",
"uses" : [
"my-default-network-map",
"my-eu-netmap",
"my-default-cdnifci-map",
"my-filtered-cdnifci-map"
"my-cdnifci-map-with-network-map-footprints"
],
"capabilities" : {
"incremental-change-media-types" : {
"my-default-network-map" : "application/json-patch+json",
"my-eu-netmap" : "application/json-patch+json",
"my-default-cdnifci-map" :
"application/merge-patch+json,application/json-patch+json",
"my-filtered-cdnifci-map" :
"application/merge-patch+jso,application/json-patch+json",
"my-cdnifci-map-with-network-map-footprints" :
"application/merge-patch+json,application/json-patch+json"
}
}
},
"update-my-props": {
"uri" : "http://alto.example.com/updates/properties",
"media-type" : "text/event-stream",
"uses" : [
"cdnifci-property-map",
"filtered-cdnifci-property-map"
],
"capabilities" : {
"incremental-change-media-types": {
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
"cdnifci-property-map" :
"application/merge-patch+json,application/json-patch+json",
"filtered-cdnifci-property-map":
"application/merge-patch+json,application/json-patch+json"
}
}
}
}
}
3.7.2. Basic Example
In this example, we demonstrate a simple CDNI FCI map; this map does
not depend on other resources.
GET /cdnifcimap HTTP/1.1
Host: alto.example.com
Accept: application/cdni,application/alto-error+json
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: XXX
Content-Type: application/cdni
{
"meta" : {
"vtag": {
"resource-id": "my-default-cdnifci-map",
"tag": "da65eca2eb7a10ce8b059740b0b2e3f8eb1d4785"
}
},
"cdnifci-map": {
"capabilities": [
{
"capability-type": "FCI.DeliveryProtocol",
"capability-value": {
"delivery-protocols": [
"http/1.1"
]
},
"footprints": [
<Footprint objects>
]
},
{
"capability-type": "FCI.DeliveryProtocol",
"capability-value": {
"delivery-protocols": [
"https/1.1",
"http/1.1"
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
]
},
"footprints": [
<Footprint objects>
]
},
{
"capability-type": "FCI.AcquisitionProtocol",
"capability-value": {
"acquisition-protocols": [
"https/1.1"
]
},
"footprints": [
<Footprint objects>
]
}
]
}
}
3.7.3. Incremental Updates Example
A benefit of using ALTO to provide CDNI FCI maps is that such maps
can be updated using ALTO incremental updates. Below is an example
that also shows a benefit of using a JSON merge patch to encode a big
update and using a JSON patch to encode a small update.
POST /updates/cdnifcimaps HTTP/1.1
Host: alto.example.com
Accept: text/event-stream,application/alto-error+json
Content-Type: application/alto-updatestreamparams+json
Content-Length: ###
{ "add": {
"my-cdnifci-stream": {
"resource-id": "my-default-cdnifci-map"
}
}
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Type: text/event-stream
event: application/alto-updatestreamcontrol+json
data: {"control-uri":
data: "http://alto.example.com/updates/streams/3141592653589"}
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
event: application/cdni,my-fci-stream
data: { ... full CDNI FCI map ... }
event: application/merge-patch+json,my-fci-stream
data: {
data: "meta": {
data: "vtag": {
data: "tag": "dasdfa10ce8b059740bddsfasd8eb1d47853716"
data: }
data: },
data: {
data: "capability-type": "FCI.DeliveryProtocol",
data: "capability-value": {
data: "delivery-protocols": [
data: "http/1.1"
data: ]
data: },
data: "footprints": [
data: <Footprint objects that are different from
data: footprint objects in delivery-protocols http/1.1>
data: ]
data: }
data: }
event: application/json-patch+json,my-fci-stream
data: [
data: {
data: "op": "replace",
data: "path": "/meta/vtag/tag",
data: "value": "a10ce8b059740b0b2e3f8eb1d4785acd42231bfe"
data: },
data: { "op": "add",
data: "path": "/cdnifci-map/capabilities/0/footprints/-",
data: "value": "ipv4:192.0.2.0/24"
data: }
data: ]
4. CDNI FCI Map Using ALTO Network Map
4.1. Introduce Footprint Type: altonetworkmap
In addition to the already defined CDNI footprint typs (e.g.,
ipv4cidr, ipv6cidr, asn, countrycode), ALTO network maps can be a
type of FCI footprint. To enable such referencing to ALTO network
maps, a new CDNI Footprint Type "altonetworkmap" is defined (see also
Section 7.1).
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
All altonetworkmap entries MUST be of type PIDName (as defined in
[RFC7285], where PIDName corresponds to a PID in the ALTO network map
referenced by the resource ID of the network map listed in
"dependent-vtags" field).
4.2. Examples
4.2.1. IRD Example
Please see Section 3.7.1
4.2.2. ALTO Network Map for CDNI FCI Footprints Example
Below is an example network map that is referenced by the CDNI FCI
map example in Section 4.2.3
GET /networkmap HTTP/1.1
Host: http://alto.example.com/myeunetmap
Accept: application/alto-networkmap+json,application/alto-error+json
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: XXX
Content-Type: application/alto-networkmap+json
{
"meta" : {
"vtag": [
{"resource-id": "my-eu-netmap",
"tag": "3ee2cb7e8d63d9fab71b9b34cbf764436315542e"
}
]
},
"network-map" : {
"south-france" : {
"ipv4" : [ "192.0.2.0/24", "198.51.100.0/25" ]
},
"germany" : {
"ipv4" : [ "192.0.3.0/24"]
}
}
}
4.2.3. ALTO Network Map Footprints in CDNI FCI Map
In this example, we show a CDNI FCI map that depends on a network map
described in Section 4.2.2.
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
GET /networkcdnifcimap HTTP/1.1
Host: alto.example.com
Accept: application/cdni,application/alto-error+json
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 618
Content-Type: application/cdni
{
"meta" : {
"dependent-vtags" : [
{
"resource-id": "my-eu-netmap",
"tag": "3ee2cb7e8d63d9fab71b9b34cbf764436315542e"
}
]
},
"cdnifci-map": {
"capabilities": [
{ "capability-type": "FCI.DeliveryProtocol",
"capability-value": [
"http/1.1"
]
},
{ "capability-type": "FCI.DeliveryProtocol",
"capability-value": [
"values": [
"https/1.1"
],
"footprints": [
{ "footprint-type": "altonetworkmap",
"footprint-value": [
"germany",
"south-france"
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
4.2.4. Incremental Updates Example
In this example, the ALTO client is interested in changes of "my-
cdnifci-map-with-network-map-footrprints". And we present two
patches here. The first one of it is to change footprints of
http/1.1 Delivery Protocol capability, and the second one is to
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
remove "south-france" from the footprints of https/1.1 Delivery
Protocol capability.
POST /updates/cdnifcimaps HTTP/1.1
Host: alto.example.com
Accept: text/event-stream,application/alto-error+json
Content-Type: application/alto-updatestreamparams+json
Content-Length: ###
{ "add": {
"my-network-map-cdnifci-stream": {
"resource-id": "my-cdnifci-map-with-network-map-footprints"
}
}
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Type: text/event-stream
event: application/alto-updatestreamcontrol+json
data: {"control-uri":
data: "http://alto.example.com/updates/streams/3141592653590"}
event: application/cdni,my-fci-stream
data: { ... full CDNI FCI map ... }
event: application/merge-patch+json,my-fci-stream
data: {
data: "meta": {
data: "dependent-vtags" : [
data: {
data: "resource-id": "my-eu-netmap",
data: "tag": "3ee2cb7e8d63d9fab71b9b34cbf764436315542e"
data: }
data: ],
data: "vtag": {
data: "tag": "dasdfa10ce8b059740bddsfasd8eb1d47853716"
data: }
data: },
data: {
data: "capability-type": "FCI.DeliveryProtocol",
data: "capability-value": {
data: "delivery-protocols": [
data: "http/1.1"
data: ]
data: },
data: "footprints": [
data: <Footprint objects that are different from
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
data: footprint objects in delivery-protocols http/1.1>
data: ]
data: }
data: }
event: application/json-patch+json,my-fci-stream
data: [
data: {
data: "op": "replace",
data: "path": "/meta/vtag/tag",
data: "value": "a10ce8b059740b0b2e3f8eb1d4785acd42231bfe"
data: },
data: { "op": "remove",
data: "path": "/cdnifci-map/capabilities/2/footprints/0/
data: footprint-value/1",
data: }
data: ]
5. Filtered CDNI FCI Map Using Capabilities
This document defines a new service named "Filtered CDNI FCI Map
Service". And a filtered CDNI FCI map is a CDNI FCI map for which an
ALTO client may supply additional capabilities to limit the scope of
the resulting CDNI FCI map. The relationship between a filtered CDNI
FCI map and a CDNI FCI Map is similar to the relationship between a
filtered network/cost map and a network/cost map.
5.1. Media Type
Since a filtered CDNI FCI map is still a CDNI FCI map, it uses the
media type defined for CDNI FCI maps at Section 3.1.
5.2. HTTP Method
A filtered CDNI FCI map is requested using the HTTP POST method.
5.3. Accept Input Parameters
The input parameters for a filtered CDNI FCI map are supplied in the
entity body of the POST request. This document specifies the input
parameters with a data format indicated by the media type
"application/alto-cdni-filter", which is a JSON object of type
ReqFilteredCDNIFCIMap, where:
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
object {
JSONString capability-type;
JSONValue capability-value;
} CDNIFCICapability;
object {
CDNIFCICapability cdni-fci-capabilities<0..*>;
} ReqFilteredCDNIFCIMap;
with fields:
capability-type: The same as Base Advertisement Object's capability-
type defined in Section 5.1 of [RFC8008].
capability-value: The same as Base Advertisement Object's
capability-value defined in Section 5.1 of [RFC8008].
cdni-fci-capabilities: A list of CDNI FCI capabilities defined in
Section 5.1 of [RFC8008] for which footprints are to be returned.
If a list is empty, the ALTO server MUST interpret it as a request
for the full CDNI FCI Map. The ALTO server MUST interpret entries
appearing in a list multiple times as if they appeared only once.
The ALTO client SHOULD avoid the same entries appearing in "cdni-
fci-capabilities" multiple times. If the "cdni-fci-capabilities"
field is not present, the ALTO server MUST interpret it as a
request for the full CDNI FCI Map.
5.4. Capabilities
None.
5.5. Uses
The resource ID of the CDNI FCI map based on which the filtering is
performed.
5.6. Response
The format is the same as an unfiltered CDNI FCI map. See
Section 3.6 for the format.
The returned CDNI FCI map MUST contain only CDNI FCI objects whose
CDNI capability object is the superset of one of CDNI capability
object in "cdni-fci-capabilities". Specifically, that a CDNI
capability object A is the superset of another CDNI capability object
B means that these two CDNI capability objects have the same
capability type and mandatory properties in capability value of A
MUST include mandatory properties in capability value of B
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
semantically. For example, if a CDNI FCI capability in "cdni-fci-
capabilities" is Delivery Protocol capability object with "http/1.1"
in its field "delivery-protocols" and the original full CDNI FCI map
has two CDNI FCI objects whose capabilities are Delivery Protocol
capability objects with ["http/1.1"] and ["http/1.1", "https/1.1"] in
their field "delivery-protocols" respectively, both of these two CDNI
FCI objects MUST be returned. If the input parameters contain a CDNI
capability object that is not currently defined, the ALTO server MUST
behave as if the CDNI capability object did not appear in the input
parameters.
The version tag included in the "vtag" field of the response MUST
correspond to the full CDNI FCI map resource from which the filtered
CDNI FCI map is provided. This ensures that a single, canonical
version tag is used independently of any filtering that is requested
by an ALTO client.
5.7. Examples
5.7.1. IRD Example
Please see Section 3.7.1
5.7.2. Basic Example
This example is filtering the full CDNI FCI map example in
Section 3.7.2.
POST /cdnifcimap/filtered HTTP/1.1
HOST: alto.example.com
Content-Type: application/cdnifilter+json
Accept: application/cdni
{
"cdni-fci-capabilities": [
{
"capability-type": "FCI.DeliveryProtocol",
"capability-value": {
"delivery-protocols": [
"http/1.1"
]
}
}
]
}
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: XXX
Content-Type: application/cdni
{
"meta" : {
"vtag": {
"resource-id": "my-default-cdnifci-map",
"tag": "da65eca2eb7a10ce8b059740b0b2e3f8eb1d4785"
}
},
"cdnifci-map": {
"capabilities": [
{
"capability-type": "FCI.DeliveryProtocol",
"capability-value": {
"delivery-protocols": [
"http/1.1"
]
},
"footprints": [
<Footprint objects>
]
},
{
"capability-type": "FCI.DeliveryProtocol",
"capability-value": {
"delivery-protocols": [
"https/1.1",
"http/1.1"
]
},
"footprints": [
<Footprint objects>
]
}
]
}
}
5.7.3. Incremental Updates Example
In this example, the ALTO client only cares about the updates of one
Delivery Protocol object whose value is "http/1.1". So it adds its
limitation of capabilities in "input" field of the POST request.
POST /updates/cdnifcimaps HTTP/1.1
Host: fcialtoupdate.example.com
Accept: text/event-stream,application/alto-error+json
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
Content-Type: application/alto-updatestreamparams+json
Content-Length: ###
{ "add": {
"my-fci-stream": {
"resource-id": "my-filtered-cdnifci-map",
"input": {
"cdni-fci-capabilities": [
{
"capability-type": "FCI.DeliveryProtocol",
"capability-value": {
"delivery-protocols": [
"http/1.1"
]
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Type: text/event-stream
event: application/alto-updatestreamcontrol+json
data: {"control-uri":
data: "http://alto.example.com/updates/streams/3141592653590"}
event: application/cdni,my-fci-stream
data: { ... full filtered CDNI FCI map ... }
event: application/merge-patch+json,my-fci-stream
data: {
data: "meta": {
data: "vtag": {
data: "tag": "dasdfa10ce8b059740bddsfasd8eb1d47853716"
data: }
data: },
data: {
data: "capability-type": "FCI.DeliveryProtocol",
data: "capability-value": {
data: "delivery-protocols": [
data: "http/1.1"
data: ]
data: },
data: "footprints": [
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
data: <Footprint objects that are different from
data: footprint objects in delivery-protocols http/1.1>
data: ]
data: }
data: }
event: application/json-patch+json,my-fci-stream
data: [
data: {
data: "op": "replace",
data: "path": "/meta/vtag/tag",
data: "value": "a10ce8b059740b0b2e3f8eb1d4785acd42231bfe"
data: },
data: { "op": "add",
data: "path": "/cdnifci-map/capabilities/0/footprints/-",
data: "value": "ipv4:192.0.2.0/24"
data: }
data: ]
6. Query Footprint Properties using ALTO Unified Property Service
In this section, we describe how ALTO clients look up properties for
individual footprints. Our design decision here is to use ALTO
unified property map service to query footprint properties because we
do not want to introduce extra complexity and ALTO unified property
map defined in [I-D.ietf-alto-unified-props-new] already meets the
requirement. A footprint is a group of entities, and CDNI
capabilities can be regarded as properties of a footprint. Unified
property map is used to provide properties for collections of
entities such as CIDRs or PIDs. So every footprint can be presented
as a set of entities, and we will describe it in details in
Section 6.1. In addition, two resource types Property Maps and
Filtered Property Maps are already well-defined in
[I-D.ietf-alto-unified-props-new].
A unified property map that includes "cdni-fci-capabilities" property
registered in Section 7 builds the inverted index of a CDNI FCI map.
The building process consists of two steps: firstly, each footprint
object is represented as a set of unified property map entities in a
domain; secondly, each unified property map entity is mapped into a
list of property objects including CDNI capabilities.
6.1. Representing Footprint Objects as Unified Property Map entities
A footprint object has two properties: footprint-type and footprint-
value. A footprint-value is an array of footprint values conforming
to the specification associated with the registered footprint type
("ipv4cidr", "ipv6cidr", "asn", and "countrycode"). Since each
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
unified property map entity has a unique address and each pair of
footprint-type and a footprint value determines a group of unique
addresses, a footprint object can be represented as a set of entities
according to their different footprint-type and footprint values.
However, [I-D.ietf-alto-unified-props-new] only defines IPv4 Domain
and IPv6 Domain which represent footprint-type "ipv4cidr" and
"ipv6cidr" respectively. To represent footprint-type "asn" and
"countrycode", this document registers two new domains in Section 7.
Here gives an example of representing a footprint object as a set of
unified property map entities.
{"footprint-type": "ipv4cidr", "footprint-value": ["192.0.2.0/24",
"198.51.100.0/24"]} --> "ipv4:192.168.2.0/24", "ipv4:198.51.100.0/24"
6.1.1. ASN Domain
This document specifies a new domain in addition to the ones in
[I-D.ietf-alto-unified-props-new]. ASN is the abbreviation of
Autonomous System Number.
6.1.1.1. Domain Name
asn
6.1.1.2. Domain-Specific Entity Addresses
The entity address of asn domain is encoded as a string consisting of
the characters "as" (in lowercase) followed by the ASN [RFC6793].
6.1.1.3. Hierarchy and Inheritance
There is no hierarchy or inheritance for properties associated with
ASN.
6.1.2. COUNTRYCODE Domain
This document specifies a new domain in addition to the ones in
[I-D.ietf-alto-unified-props-new].
6.1.2.1. Domain Name
countrycode
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
6.1.2.2. Domain-Specific Entity Addresses
The entity address of countrycode domain is encoded as an ISO 3166-1
alpha-2 code [ISO3166-1] in lowercase.
6.1.2.3. Hierarchy and Inheritance
There is no hierarchy or inheritance for properties associated with
country codes.
6.2. Examples
6.2.1. IRD Example
Please see Section Section 3.7.1
6.2.2. Property Map Example
This example shows a full unified property map in which entities are
footprints and entities' property is "cdni-fci-capabilities".
GET /propmap/full/cdnifci HTTP/1.1
HOST: alto.example.com
Accept: application/alto-propmap+json,application/alto-error+json
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: ###
Content-Type: application/alto-propmap+json
{
"property-map": {
"meta": {
"dependent-vtags": [
{"resource-id": "my-default-cdnifci-map",
"tag": "7915dc0290c2705481c491a2b4ffbec482b3cf62"}
]
},
"countrycode:us": {
"cdni-fci-capabilities": [{"capability-type":,
"capability-value":}]
},
"ipv4:192.0.2.0/24": {
"cdni-fci-capabilities": [{"capability-type":,
"capability-value":}]
},
"ipv4:198.51.100.0/24": {
"cdni-fci-capabilities": [{"capability-type":,
"capability-value":}]
},
"ipv6:2001:db8::/32": {
"cdni-fci-capabilities": [{"capability-type":,
"capability-value":}]
},
"asn:as64496": {
"cdni-fci-capabilities": [{"capability-type":,
"capability-value":}]
}
}
}
6.2.3. Filtered Property Map Example
In this example, we use filtered property map service to get "pid"
and "cdni-fci-capabilities" properties for two footprints
"ipv4:192.0.2.0/24" and "ipv6:2001:db8::/32".
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
POST /propmap/lookup/cdnifci-pid HTTP/1.1
HOST: alto.example.com
Content-Type: application/alto-propmapparams+json
Accept: application/alto-propmap+json,application/alto-error+json
Content-Length:
{
"entities": [
"ipv4:192.0.2.0/24",
"ipv6:2001:db8::/32"
],
"properties": [ "cdni-fci-capabilities", "pid" ]
}
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: ###
Content-Type: application/alto-propmap+json
{
"property-map": {
"meta": {
"dependent-vtags": [
{"resource-id": "my-default-cdnifci-map",
"tag": "7915dc0290c2705481c491a2b4ffbec482b3cf62"},
{"resource-id": "my-default-networkmap",
"tag": "7915dc0290c2705481c491a2b4ffbec482b3cf63"}
]
},
"ipv4:192.0.2.0/24": {
"cdni-fci-capabilities": [{"capability-type":,
"capability-value":}],
"pid": "pid1"
},
"ipv6:2001:db8::/32": {
"cdni-fci-capabilities": [{"capability-type":,
"capability-value":}],
"pid": "pid3"
}
}
}
6.2.4. Incremental Updates Example
In this example, here is a client want to request updates for the
properties "cdni-fci-capabilities" and "pid" for two footprints
"ipv4:192.0.2.0/24" and "ipv6:2001:db8::/32".
POST /updates/properties HTTP/1.1
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
Host: alto.example.com
Accept: text/event-stream,application/alto-error+json
Content-Type: application/alto-updatestreamparams+json
Content-Length: ###
{ "add": {
"property-map-including-capability-property": {
"resource-id": "filtered-cdnifci-property-map",
"input": {
"properties": ["cdni-fci-capabilities", "pid"],
"entities": [
"ipv4:192.0.2.0/24",
"ipv6:2001:db8::/32"
]
}
}
}
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Type: text/event-stream
event: application/alto-updatestreamcontrol+json
data: {"control-uri":
data: "http://alto.example.com/updates/streams/1414213562373"}
event: application/cdni,my-fci-stream
data: { ... full filtered unified property map ... }
event: application/merge-patch+json,my-fci-stream
data: {
data: "property-map":
data: {
data: "meta": {
data: "dependent-vtags": [
data: {"resource-id": "my-default-cdnifci-map",
data: "tag": "2beeac8ee23c3dd1e98a73fd30df80ece9fa5627"},
data: {"resource-id": "my-default-networkmap",
data: "tag": "7915dc0290c2705481c491a2b4ffbec482b3cf63"}
data: ]
data: },
data: "ipv4:192.0.2.0/24":
data: {
data: "cdni-fci-capabilities":
data: [{"capability-type":,"capability-value":}]
data: }
data: }
data: }
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
event: application/json-patch+json,my-fci-stream
data: {[
data: {
data: { "op": "replace",
data: "path": "/meta/dependent-vtags/0/tag",
data: "value": "61b23185a50dc7b334577507e8f00ff8c3b409e4"
data: },
data: { "op": "replace",
data: "path": "/property-map/ipv4:192.0.2.0~124/",
data: "value": "pid5"
data: }
data: }
data: ]}
7. IANA Considerations
7.1. CDNI Metadata Footprint Type Registry
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
| Footprint Type | Description | Specification |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
| altonetworkmap | A list of PID-names | RFCthis |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
Table 1: ALTO Entity Domain
[RFC Editor: Please replace RFCthis with the published RFC number for
this document.]
7.2. ALTO Entity Domain Registry
As proposed in Section 9.2 of [I-D.ietf-alto-unified-props-new],
"ALTO Entity Domain Registry" is requested. Besides, two new domain
is to be registered, listed in Table 2.
+--------------+-------------------------+--------------------------+
| Identifier | Entity Address Encoding | Hierarchy & Inheritance |
+--------------+-------------------------+--------------------------+
| asn | See Section 6.1.1.2 | None |
| countrycode | See Section 6.1.2.2 | None |
+--------------+-------------------------+--------------------------+
Table 2: ALTO Entity Domain
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
7.3. ALTO CDNI FCI Property Type Registry
The "ALTO CDNI FCI Property Type Registry" is required by the ALTO
Entity Domain "asn", "countrycode", "ipv4" and "ipv6", listed in
Table 3.
+------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Identifier | Intended Semantics |
+------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| cdni-fci-capabilities | An array of CDNI FCI capability objects |
+------------------------+------------------------------------------+
Table 3: ALTO CDNI FCI Property Types
8. Security Considerations
One important security consideration is the proper authentication of
advertisement information provided by a downstream CDN. The ALTO
protocol provides a specification for a signature of ALTO information
(see Section 15 of [RFC7285]. ALTO thus provides a proper mechanism
for protecting the integrity of FCI information.
More Security Considerations will be discussed in a future version of
this document.
9. Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Kevin Ma, Daryl Malas, Matt Caulfield
for their timely reviews and invaluable comments.
Jan Seedorf is partially supported by the GreenICN project (GreenICN:
Architecture and Applications of Green Information Centric
Networking), a research project supported jointly by the European
Commission under its 7th Framework Program (contract no. 608518) and
the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology
(NICT) in Japan (contract no. 167). The views and conclusions
contained herein are those of the authors and should not be
interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or
endorsements, either expressed or implied, of the GreenICN project,
the European Commission, or NICT.
10. References
10.1. Normative References
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
[RFC5693] Seedorf, J. and E. Burger, "Application-Layer Traffic
Optimization (ALTO) Problem Statement", RFC 5693,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5693, October 2009, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc5693>.
[RFC6707] Niven-Jenkins, B., Le Faucheur, F., and N. Bitar, "Content
Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Problem
Statement", RFC 6707, DOI 10.17487/RFC6707, September
2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6707>.
[RFC6793] Vohra, Q. and E. Chen, "BGP Support for Four-Octet
Autonomous System (AS) Number Space", RFC 6793,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6793, December 2012, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc6793>.
[RFC7285] Alimi, R., Ed., Penno, R., Ed., Yang, Y., Ed., Kiesel, S.,
Previdi, S., Roome, W., Shalunov, S., and R. Woundy,
"Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Protocol",
RFC 7285, DOI 10.17487/RFC7285, September 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7285>.
[RFC7336] Peterson, L., Davie, B., and R. van Brandenburg, Ed.,
"Framework for Content Distribution Network
Interconnection (CDNI)", RFC 7336, DOI 10.17487/RFC7336,
August 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7336>.
[RFC8006] Niven-Jenkins, B., Murray, R., Caulfield, M., and K. Ma,
"Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI)
Metadata", RFC 8006, DOI 10.17487/RFC8006, December 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8006>.
[RFC8008] Seedorf, J., Peterson, J., Previdi, S., van Brandenburg,
R., and K. Ma, "Content Delivery Network Interconnection
(CDNI) Request Routing: Footprint and Capabilities
Semantics", RFC 8008, DOI 10.17487/RFC8008, December 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8008>.
[ISO3166-1]
The International Organization for Standardization, "Codes
for the representation of names of countries and their
subdivisions -- Part 1: Country codes", ISO 3166-1:2013,
2013.
10.2. Informative References
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
[I-D.ietf-alto-incr-update-sse]
Roome, W. and Y. Yang, "ALTO Incremental Updates Using
Server-Sent Events (SSE)", draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-
sse-07 (work in progress), July 2017.
[I-D.jenkins-alto-cdn-use-cases]
Niven-Jenkins, B., Watson, G., Bitar, N., Medved, J., and
S. Previdi, "Use Cases for ALTO within CDNs", draft-
jenkins-alto-cdn-use-cases-03 (work in progress), June
2012.
[I-D.ietf-alto-unified-props-new]
Roome, W. and Y. Yang, "Extensible Property Maps for the
ALTO Protocol", draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-00 (work
in progress), July 2017.
Authors' Addresses
Jan Seedorf
HFT Stuttgart - Univ. of Applied Sciences
Schellingstrasse 24
Stuttgart 70174
Germany
Phone: +49-0711-8926-2801
Email: jan.seedorf@hft-stuttgart.de
Y.R. Yang
Tongji/Yale University
51 Prospect Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States of America
Email: yry@cs.yale.edu
URI: http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/
Kevin J. Ma
Ericsson
43 Nagog Park
Acton, MA 01720
United States of America
Phone: +1-978-844-5100
Email: kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft CDNI FCI using ALTO March 2018
Jon Peterson
NeuStar
1800 Sutter St Suite 570
Concord, CA 94520
United States of America
Email: jon.peterson@neustar.biz
X.S. Lin
Tongji University
4800 Cao'an Hwy
Shanghai 201804
China
Email: x.shawn.lin@gmail.com
Seedorf, et al. Expires September 19, 2018 [Page 34]