Network Working Group                                   Arnt Gulbrandsen
Internet-Draft                                                 June 2012
Intended Status: Standards Track

                        The IMAP Move Extension

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors. All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   ( in effect on the date of
   publication of this document. Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at The list of Internet-
   Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at

   This Internet-Draft expires in December 2012.

Gulbrandsen               Expires December 2012                 [Page 1]

Internet-draft                                                 June 2012


   The MOVE extension provides a new command, UID MOVE, which moves one
   or more messages from the selected mailbox to a named mailbox.

1. Conventions Used in This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

   Formal syntax is defined by [RFC5234].

   Example lines prefaced by "C:" are sent by the client and ones
   prefaced by "S:" by the server.

2. Overview

   This document defines an IMAP extension to move messages from one
   mailbox to another. This function (very common in MUA UIs) is not
   provided by stock IMAP, and clients have to use a combination of UID
   STORE, UID COPY and EXPUNGE, and cope with partial failures and side

   Only UID MOVE is defined, not MOVE. There are three reasons for this.
   First, MOVE poses some difficult questions with regard to expunges.
   Second, in a survey of user agents that provide move in the user
   interface, all were seen to use UID commands anyway. Third, a server
   implementer reported that implementing move based on message sequence
   numbers would be more difficult than UID MOVE.

   If MSN-based move is found to be needed (rather than just neat), it
   can be defined by a future document.


   The UID MOVE command takes two arguments: a set of UIDs and a named
   mailbox. It moves each message included in the UID set to the named

   The UID MOVE command has the same effect as a sequence of UID COPY,
   UID STORE +FLAGS \DELETED and UID EXPUNGE, with three differences:

Gulbrandsen               Expires December 2012                 [Page 2]

Internet-draft                                                 June 2012

   First, each message SHOULD either be moved or unaffected. The server
   SHOULD NOT leave a message in neither or both mailboxes afterwards
   (even if the server returns a tagged NO response).

   Second, the messages MUST NOT have the \Deleted flag set in the
   target mailbox.

   Third, the server is not required to send FETCH FLAGS responses for
   the messages it expunges.

   UID MOVE is the same as the three-command sequence in all other
   respects, which implies that extensions which affect the three-
   command sequence also affect UID MOVE, and that response codes such
   as COPYUID, TRYCREATE and so on should be sent as appropriate.

   An example:
        C: a UID MOVE 42:69 forble
        S: * 22 EXPUNGE
        S: (more expunges)
        S: a OK [COPYUID 432432 42:69 1202:1229] Done

   Note that the server may send EXPUNGEs for other messages as well, if
   any happen to have been expunged at the same time.

   Implementers will need to read [RFC4315] to understand what UID
   EXPUNGE does. Implementing [RFC4315] is not necessary.

4. Interaction with other extensions

   This section points out how other IMAP extensions interact with this.

4.1. RFC 2087, QUOTA

   The QUOTA extension (defined by [RFC2087]) may interact with MOVE, on
   some servers, in the sense that a MOVE command may succeed where COPY
   would cause a quota overrun. This may be user-visible, but should not
   be MUA-visible.

4.2. RFC 4314, ACL

   Since UID MOVE is defined as equivalent to UID STORE, UID COPY and
   UID EXPUNGE, it requires the same ACL rights as the union of those
   three commands.

Gulbrandsen               Expires December 2012                 [Page 3]

Internet-draft                                                 June 2012

4.3. RFC 4315, UIDPLUS

   Since UID MOVE is defined by reference to UID COPY, the server has to
   send COPYUID for UID MOVE, exactly as it does for UID COPY.

4.3. RFC 5162, QRESYNC

   The QRESYNC extension defined by [RFC5162] directs the server to send
   VANISHED rather than EXPUNGE for the UID EXPUNGE command. Since UID
   MOVE is defined by by reference to UID EXPUNGE, UID MOVE is also

5. Formal Syntax

   The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur
   Form (ABNF) notation as specified in [RFC5234]. [RFC3501] defines the
   non-terminals "capability", "command", "set" and "mailbox".

   Except as noted otherwise, all alphabetic characters are case-
   insensitive.  The use of upper or lower case characters to define
   token strings is for editorial clarity only.  Implementations MUST
   accept these strings in a case-insensitive fashion.

       capability     =/ "MOVE"

       command-select =/ "UID MOVE" SP set SP mailbox

6. Security Considerations

   This document is believed to add no security problems. It does
   however relieve a problem with the base specification, since client
   authors have to devise and implement complicated algorithms to handle
   partial failures of the STORE/COPY/EXPUNGE trio. Problems with these
   algorithms can lead to mail loss.

7. IANA Considerations

   The IANA is requested to add MOVE to the "IMAP 4 Capabilities"

Gulbrandsen               Expires December 2012                 [Page 4]

Internet-draft                                                 June 2012

8. Acknowledgements

   An extension like this has been proposed many times, by many people.
   This document is based on several of those, most recently that by
   Witold Krecicki. Witold, Alexey Melnikov, Bron Gondwana, Adrien W. de
   Croy, Barry Leiba and others provided valuable comments.

9. Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, Harvard University, March

   [RFC3501]  Crispin, "Internet Message Access Protocol - Version
              4rev1", RFC 3501, University of Washington, June 2003.

   [RFC4315]  Crispin, "Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) -
              UIDPLUS extension", RFC 4315, University of Washington,
              December 2005.

   [RFC5234]  Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
              Specifications: ABNF", RFC 5234, January 2008.

10. Informative References

   [RFC2087]  Myers, "IMAP4 QUOTA extension", RFC 2087, January 1997.

   [RFC4315]  Melnikov, "IMAP4 Access Control List (ACL) Extension", RFC
              4314, December 2005.

   [RFC5162]  Melnikov, "IMAP4 Extensions for Quick Mailbox
              Resynchronization", RFC 5162, Isode Ltd, March 2008.

11. Author's Address

   Arnt Gulbrandsen
   Schweppermannstr. 8
   D-81671 Muenchen

   Fax: +49 89 4502 9758


Gulbrandsen               Expires December 2012                 [Page 5]

Internet-draft                                                 June 2012

          (RFC Editor: Please delete everything after this point)

   RFC Editor: If this document contains no code components when you
   receive it, then please remove the sentence which starts with "code
   components". Thank you.

Open Issues

   Delete the \deleted rule?

   I'd like to have other text to replace the sentence about needed and

   Add MSN-based move now? It seems we have about ten servers who can do
   MSN move easily, one perhaps with some difficulty, and one client
   which wants it.

   Add 3501-like requirements/results paragraphs.

Changes since -00

-  Fixed two bad nouns. Mailboxes aren't messages.

-  Adrien's server can easily do UID MOVE but not so easily MSN-based

Changes since -01

-  Changed to Informative, on Barry's suggestion. Or did I ask him?

-  Removed the 'reasons to avoid', it was doubleplusungood.

Changes since draft-gulbrandsen-imap-move-02

-  Various wording changes from Barry's review.

-  Open issue: Delete the \deleted rule?

-  Back to PS, informative didn't fly in the IESG

-  Turned into a WG document in order to get write access to the IMAP4
   capabilities registry

Gulbrandsen               Expires December 2012                 [Page 6]

Internet-draft                                                 June 2012

-  Mention VANISHED in 5162

-  Added bad boilerplate to please idnits. This document contains no

Gulbrandsen               Expires December 2012                 [Page 7]