ISIS WG
Internet Draft JP Vasseur
Stefano Previdi
Cisco Systems
Document: draft-ietf-isis-link-attr-00.txt
Expires: July 2005 January 2004
Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute sub-TLV
draft-ietf-isis-link-attr-00.txt
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
patent or IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed, and any
of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with RFC
3668.
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026 [i].
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Abstract
This document defines a sub-TLV called ôLink-attributesö carried
within the TLV 22 and used to flood some link characteristics.
Conventions used in this document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [ii].
Vasseur and Previdi [Page 1]
Table of contents
1. Introduction................................................. 2
2. Link-attributes sub-TLV format............................... 2
3. Interoperability with routers non supporting this capability. 3
4. Security considerations...................................... 3
5. Intellectual Property Considerations......................... 3
6. Acknowledgments.............................................. 4
7. Intellectual property considerations......................... 4
8. References................................................... 5
Normative references............................................ 5
Informative references.......................................... 5
9. Author's Addresses........................................... 5
Full Copyright Statement........................................ 5
1. Introduction
[IS-IS] specifies the IS-IS protocol (ISO 10589) with extensions to
support IPv4 in [IS-IS-IP]. A router advertises one or several Link
State Protocol data units which are composed of variable length
tuples called TLVs (Type-Length-Value).
[IS-IS-TE] defines a set of new TLVs whose aims are to add more
information about links characteristics, increase the range of IS-IS
metrics and optimize the encoding of IS-IS prefixes.
This document defines a new sub-TLV named ôLink-attributesö carried
within the extended IS reachability TLV (type 22) specified in [IS-
IS-TE].
2. Link-attributes sub-TLV format
The link-attribute sub-TLV is carried within the TLV 22 and has a
format identical to the sub-TLV format used by the Traffic
Engineering Extensions for IS-IS [IS-IS-TE]: 1 octet of sub-type, 1
octet of length of the value field of the sub-TLV followed by the
value field û in this case, a 16 bit flags field.
The Link-attribute sub-type is 19 (to be assigned by IANA) and has a
length of 2 octets.
This sub-TLV is OPTIONAL and MAY appear at most once for a single IS
neighbor.
Vasseur and Previdi [Page 2]
The following bits are defined (values to be confirmed by IANA):
Local Protection Available (0x01). When set, this indicates that the
link is protected by means of some local protection mechanism (e.g
[FRR]).
Link excluded from local protection path (0x02). When set, this link
SHOULD not be included in any computation of a repair path by any
other router in the routing area. The triggers for setting up this
bit are out of the scope of this document.
Such link characteristics has several applications such as
constrained shortest path computation for a Traffic Engineering Label
Switched (TE LSP) path or the triggering of specific actions in the
context of IS-IS SPF computation.
Local maintenance required (0x04). When set, this indicates that the
link will be put out of service and will consequently be shortly
unavailable. The set of actions triggered by other nodes is out of
the scope of this document. An example of the usage of this bit is
provided in [GR-SHUT].
3. Interoperability with routers non supporting this capability
A router not supporting the link-attribute sub-TLV MUST just silently
ignore this sub-TLV.
Where the information in the link attributes sub-TLV is used to
affect the IS-IS SPF calculation, additional information indicating
which routers are using this information is required to insure such
usage does not result in loops or black holes. How this additional
information is conveyed is outside the scope of this document.
4. Security considerations
No new security issues are raised in this document.
5. Intellectual Property Considerations
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
Vasseur and Previdi [Page 3]
obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
Director.
The IETF has been notified of intellectual property rights claimed in
regard to some or all of the specification contained in this
document. For more information consult the online list of claimed
rights.
6. Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Mike Shand and Les Ginsberg for their
useful comments.
7. Intellectual property considerations
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Vasseur and Previdi [Page 4]
8. References
Normative references
[RFC] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels," RFC 2119.
[IS-IS] "Intermediate System to Intermediate System Intra-Domain
Routeing Exchange Protocol for use in Conjunction with the Protocol
for Providing the Connectionless-mode Network Service (ISO 8473)",
ISO 10589.
[IS-IS-IP] Callon, R., RFC 1195, "Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in
TCP/IP and dual environments", RFC 1195, December 1990.
[IS-IS-TE] H. Smit, T. Li, ôIS-IS extensions for traffic
engineeringö, RFC 3784.
Informative references
[FRR] Ping Pan, et al, "Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP
Tunnels", draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-fastreroute-07.txt. Work in
progress.
[GR-SHUT], Z. Ali et al, ôGraceful Shutdown in MPLS Traffic
Engineering Networksö, draft-ali-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-00.txt.
Work in progress.
9. Author's Addresses
Jean-Philippe Vasseur
CISCO Systems, Inc.
300 Beaver Brook
Boxborough, MA 01719
USA
Email: jpv@cisco.com
Stefano Previdi
CISCO Systems, Inc.
Via Del Serafico 200
00142 - Roma
ITALY
Email: sprevidi@cisco.com
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Vasseur and Previdi [Page 5]
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Vasseur and Previdi [Page 6]
