Network Working                                  S.E. Hardcastle-Kille
Group                                                 ISODE Consortium
INTERNET-DRAFT                                           November 1992
                                                   Expires:  June 1993





  Use of the Directory to support mapping between X.400 and RFC 822
                              Addresses






Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet Draft.  Internet Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its Areas,
and its Working Groups.  Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet Drafts.

Internet Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months.
Internet Drafts may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time.  It is not appropriate to use Internet Drafts
as reference material or to cite them other than as a "working draft"
or "work in progress."
Please check the I-D abstract listing contained in each Internet Draft
directory to learn the current status of this or any other Internet
Draft.
Abstract

This document defines how to use directory to support the mapping
between X.400 O/R Addresses and mailboxes defined in RFC 1327 [Kil92].
This draft document will be submitted to the RFC editor as a protocol
standard.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.  Please send
comments to the author or to the discussion group
<mhs-ds@mercury.udev.cdc.com>.




INTERNET--DRAFT      RFC 822/X.400 Mapping by X.500      November 1992


1  RFC 1327 Mappings

It is important to be able to represent RFC 1327 mappings in the
directory [Kil92].  The three RFC 1327 mappings are represented within
the O/R Address and Domain hierarchies within the DIT [HK91, HK92b].
The benefits of using the existing O/R address and domain trees are:


 o  It is the ``natural'' location, and will also help to ensure
    correct administrative authority for a mapping definition.

 o  The tree will usually be accessed for routing, and so it will be
    efficient for addresses which are being routed.

 o  This efficiency can be increased by representing mappings which
    can be derived from the basic mappings, as define in [HK92a].

       An alternative approach which is not taken is to locate the
    information in separate subtrees, as defined in [HK92b].  By
    representing the information in separate subtrees, the mapping
    information would be kept in a clearly defined area which can
    be widely replicated in an efficient manner.  This is not
    done, as the benefits of the approach proposed are greater.


The values of the table mapping are defined by use of two new object
classes, as specified in Figure 1.


2  Mapping from X.400 to RFC 822

As an example, consider the mapping from the O/R Address:


PRMD=UK.AC; ADMD=Gold 400; C=GB

This would be keyed by the directory entry:


PRMD=UK.AC, ADMD=Gold 400, C=GB

and return the mapping from the associatedDomain attribute, which
gives the domain which this O/R address maps to.  This attribute is


Hardcastle-Kille                          Expires:  June 1993   Page 1




INTERNET--DRAFT      RFC 822/X.400 Mapping by X.500      November 1992




_______________________________________________________________________
rFC822ToX400Mapping OBJECT-CLASS
    SUBCLASS OF domain-component
    MAY CONTAIN {
        associatedORAddress,
        nonAuthoritativeAssociatedORAddress,
        associatedX400Gateway}
    ::= oc-rfc822-to-x400-mapping

x400ToRFC822Mapping OBJECT-CLASS
    SUBCLASS OF or-address-component                                10
    MAY CONTAIN {
        associatedDomain,
        nonAuthoritativeassociatedDomain}
    ::= oc-x400-to-x400-mapping


associatedORAddress ATTRIBUTE
    SUBTYPE OF mhs-or-addresses
    SINGLE VALUE
    ::= at-associated-or-address                                    20

nonAuthoritativeAssociatedORAddress  ATTRIBUTE
    SUBTYPE OF associatedORAddress
    SINGLE VALUE
    ::= at-non-authoriatative-associated-or-address

associatedX400Gateway ATTRIBUTE
    SUBTYPE OF mhs-or-addresses
    SINGLE VALUE
    ::= at-associated-x400-gateway                                  30

nonAuthoritativeassociatedDomain ATTRIBUTE
    SUBTYPE OF associatedDomain
    SINGLE VALUE
    ::= at-non-authoritative-associated-domain

___________Figure_1:__Object_Classes_for_RFC_1327_mappings_____________





Hardcastle-Kille                          Expires:  June 1993   Page 2




INTERNET--DRAFT      RFC 822/X.400 Mapping by X.500      November 1992


used to define authoritative mappings, which are placed in the open
community tree.  The manager of an RFC 1327 mapping should make the
appropriate entry.
To improve efficiency, the same information is made available in other
places.  There are two cases:


1.  Representation of mapping information in routing trees other than
    the open community tree.

2.  Representing a hierarchically derived mapping.  For example, a
    mapping could be stored in the entry:

    MHS-O=Salford, PRMD=UK.AC, ADMD=Gold 400, C=GB

    This information could be derived from information in the entry:

    PRMD=UK.AC, ADMD=Gold 400, C=GB

    However, it would take an extra lookup to find this information.


This information is stored by use of the
nonAuthoritativeAssociatedDomain attributes.  For example, the entry

MHS-O=UCL, PRMD=UK.AC, ADMD=Gold 400, C=GB


could have a nonAuthoritativeAssociatedDomain attribute of value
``UCL.AC.UK''. It is the responsibility of the manager of the entry to
track changes in authoritative mappings.
Functionally, mapping takes place exactly according to RFC 1327.  The
longest match is found by the following algorithm.


1.  Take the O/R Address, and derive a directory name.  This will be
    the O/R Address as far as the lowest OU.

2.  Look up the entire name derived from the RFC 1327 key in a
    convenient routing tree.  For authoritative information, the open
    tree must be used, but for performance reasons, another tree will




Hardcastle-Kille                          Expires:  June 1993   Page 3




INTERNET--DRAFT      RFC 822/X.400 Mapping by X.500      November 1992


    usually be used 1.

3.  Check for associatedDomain or nonAuthoritativeAssociatedDomain
    attributes.

     o  If the mapped value is present, stop.

     o  If not, strip one component of the name, and repeat.

If the non-authoritative information is provided, the mapping can
always be achieved with two lookups.


3  Mapping from RFC 822 to X.400


There is an analogous structure for mappings in the reverse direction.
The domain hierarchy is represented in the DIT according to RFC 1279.
The domain:

AC.UK


Is represented in the DIT as:

DomainComponent=AC, DomainComponent=UK, O=Internet


This has associated with it the attribute associatedORAddress, with a
value:

PRMD=UK.AC; ADMD=Gold 400; C=GB


There is an optimisation analogous to the reverse mapping provided by
the nonAuthoritativeORAddress attribute.
The ``table 3'' mapping is provided by the associatedX400Gateway
attribute.  This value may be different in different routing trees, as
this is not a globally unique mapping.  It is also possible to

----------------------------
    1. It may be sensible to define an attribute which indicates the
tree that an MTA uses for this purpose.


Hardcastle-Kille                          Expires:  June 1993   Page 4




INTERNET--DRAFT      RFC 822/X.400 Mapping by X.500      November 1992


identify multiple possible associated gateways.  This information is
looked up at the same time as mapped O/R addresses.  In effect, this
provides a fallback mapping, which is found if there is no equivalence
mapping.  Functionally, mapping takes place exactly according to
RFC 1327.  The longest match is found by the following algorithm.

1.  Derived a directory name from the domain part of the RFC 822
    address.

2.  Look up this name to find the mapped value (associatedORAddress or
    nonAuthoritativeAssociatedORAddress o associatedX400Gateway.).

     o  If the mapped value is present, stop.

     o  If not, strip one component of the name, and repeat.


If multiple associatedX400Gateway attributes are found, the MTA may
select the one it chooses to use.  If the non-authoritative
information is provided, the mapping can always be achieved with two
lookups.
Because of the availability of aliases, some of the table mappings may
be simplified.  In addition, the directory can support mapping from
addresses using the numeric country codes.


References

[HK91]  S.E. Hardcastle-Kille. X.500 and domains.  Request for
        Comments RFC 1279, Department of Computer Science, University
        College London, November 1991.

[HK92a] S.E. Hardcastle-Kille. MHS use of the directory to support
        MHS routing, April 1992. Internet Draft.

[HK92b] S.E. Hardcastle-Kille. Representing the O/R Address hierarchy
        in the directory information tree, April 1992. Internet
        Draft.

[Kil92] S.E. Kille. Mapping between X.400(1988) / ISO 10021 and RFC
        822. Request for Comments 1327, Department of Computer
        Science, University College London, May 1992.



Hardcastle-Kille                          Expires:  June 1993   Page 5




INTERNET--DRAFT      RFC 822/X.400 Mapping by X.500      November 1992


4  Security Considerations

Security considerations are not discussed in this INTERNET--DRAFT .


5  Author's Address

    Steve Hardcastle-Kille
    ISODE Consortium
    PO Box 505
    London
    SW11 1DX
    England


    Phone:  +44-71-223-4062

    EMail:  S.Kille@ISODE.COM


    DN: CN=Steve Hardcastle-Kille,
    O=ISODE Consortium, C=GB

    UFN: S. Hardcastle-Kille, ISODE Consortium, GB





















Hardcastle-Kille                          Expires:  June 1993   Page 6




INTERNET--DRAFT      RFC 822/X.400 Mapping by X.500      November 1992


A  Object Identifier Assignment


_______________________________________________________________________
mhs-ds OBJECT-IDENTIFIER ::= {iso(1) org(3) dod(6) internet(1) private(4)
          enterprises(1) isode-consortium (453) mhs-ds (3)}

mapping OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mhs-ds 4}

oc OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mapping 1}
at OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mapping 2}


oc-rfc822-to-x400-mapping OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {oc 1}              10
oc-x400-to-x400-mapping OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {oc 2}

at-associated-or-address OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {at 1}
at-non-authoriatative-associated-or-address OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {at 2}

at-associated-domain OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {at 4}
at-non-authoritative-associated-domain OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {at 5}


_______________Figure_2:__Object_Identifier_Assignment_________________





















Hardcastle-Kille                          Expires:  June 1993   Page 7