INTERNET DRAFT                                            Brian Haberman
                                                              Garry Kump
                                                                   (IBM)
                                                             Hal Sandick
                                                                   (Bay)
                                                             Augest 1998


                 Protocol Independent Multicast Routing
               in the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)

                      <draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-00.txt>


Status of This Memo

   This document is an Internet-Draft.  Internet Drafts are working
   documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
   and its working groups.  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet Drafts.

   Internet Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
   months, and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
   at any time.  It is not appropriate to use Internet Drafts as
   reference material, or to cite them other than as a ``working draft''
   or ``work in progress.''

   To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
   ``1id-abstracts.txt'' listing contained in the internet-drafts Shadow
   Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), ftp.nordu.net (Northern
   Europe), ftp.nis.garr.it (Southern Europe), ftp.ietf.org (US East
   Coast), ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast), or munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim).


Abstract

   This document outlines recommendations in the use of Protocol
   Independent Multicast routing protocol to support Internet Protocol
   Version 6.  It describes the changes needed in order to handle the
   differences between IPv6 and IPv4 and conform to the logic introduced
   by other routing protocols enabled for IPv6.













Haberman, Kump, Sandick          Expires February 1998          [Page i]


Internet Draft        PIM Multicast Routing for IPv6         Augest 1998




                                Contents



 1. Definitions                                                        1

 2. Introduction                                                       1

 3. Definitions and Assumptions                                        1

 4. Protocol Impact                                                    1
     4.1. Hello Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    1
     4.2. Register Message  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    2
     4.3. Register-Stop Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    2
     4.4. Join/Prune, Graft, and Graft-Ack Messages   . . . . . . .    2
     4.5. Bootstrap Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    2
     4.6. Assert Message  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    2
     4.7. Candidate-RP-Advertisement Message  . . . . . . . . . . .    3

 5. IPv6 Address Scoping                                               3

 6. Additional Areas of Work                                           3



























Haberman, Kump, Sandick         Expires February 1998          [Page ii]


Internet Draft        PIM Multicast Routing for IPv6         Augest 1998


1. Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC 2119].


2. Introduction

   This document describes a protocol for efficiently routing to
   multicast groups communicating with the Internet Protocol Version 6
   (IPv6).  This document will only describe recommendations for making
   PIM conform to practices implemented by other IPv6 routing protocols.
   The existing PIM drafts should be referenced for actual protocol
   operation.


3. Definitions and Assumptions

    -  Link Local Address - A local-use, non-routable unicast IPv6
       address [RFC 2373].

    -  All-PIM-Routers multicast address -
       A permanently assigned link-scoped IPv6 multicast address for the
       PIM protocol [RFC 2375].

   It is assumed that a router running PIM for IPv6 will have a network
   unique, globally routable IPv6 address that will serve as the
   router's Router-ID.


4. Protocol Impact

   The following will outline suggested values for the PIM protocol
   messages in order to support IPv6.  For most messages, the changes
   involve the addresses used in the IPv6 header.


4.1. Hello Message

   When sending a Hello Message, a PIM router must use a different set
   of IPv6 addresses in the IPv6 header.  The IPv6 destination address
   must be the All-PIM-Routers multicast address.  The IPv6 source
   address must be the IPv6 link local address of the interface on which
   this message is being forwarded.  The link local address in the
   source address field will be used to determine




Haberman, Kump, Sandick          Expires February 1998          [Page 1]


Internet Draft        PIM Multicast Routing for IPv6         Augest 1998


   neighbor adjacency and for DR election.  It should be noted, that the
   DR will identify itself using its Router-ID.


4.2. Register Message

   The Register Message is addressed to the Router-ID of the RP. The
   source address of the message is the Router-ID of the DR. The DR
   sending the Register Message obtains the Router-ID of the RP from the
   local RP-set information.


4.3. Register-Stop Message

   The Register-Stop Message is addressed in the same manner as the
   Register Message.  The RP addresses the message to the Router-ID of
   the DR. The source address is the Router-ID of the RP. The RP obtains
   the Router-ID of the DR from the source address field of the Register
   Message received from the DR.


4.4. Join/Prune, Graft, and Graft-Ack Messages

   In the transmission of a Join/Prune Message, a router sets the IPv6
   destination address to the All-PIM-Routers multicast address.  The
   IPv6 source address is set to the link local address of the interface
   on which the message is forwarded.  The Upstream Neighbor Address
   field is set to the link local address of the next hop router, which
   is obtained from the RPF lookup.


4.5. Bootstrap Message

   When sending a Bootstrap Message, a PIM router sets the IPv6
   destination address to the All-PIM-Routers multicast address.  The
   source address is the link local address of the interface on which
   the message is forwarded.  The BSR Address is set to the Router-ID of
   the BSR.


4.6. Assert Message

   The Assert Message has an IPv6 destination address of the
   All-PIM-Routers multicast address and an IPv6 source address of the
   link local address of the interface forwarding the message.  The link
   local address in the IPv6 source field is used to resolve ties in the




Haberman, Kump, Sandick          Expires February 1998          [Page 2]


Internet Draft        PIM Multicast Routing for IPv6         Augest 1998


   assert process.  Downstream routers save the winning assert router's
   link local address to resolve any future RPF requirements.


4.7. Candidate-RP-Advertisement Message

   The Candidate-RP-Advertisement Message uses the Router-ID of the BSR
   as the IPv6 destination address.  The source address is the Router-ID
   of the candidate RP. The RP Address field is set to the Router-ID of
   the candidate RP. Each candidate RP router creates this message and
   unicasts it to the BSR.


5. IPv6 Address Scoping

   With the introduction of scoped addresses in IPv6, new issues arise
   in the distribution of scoped routes and the forwarding of scoped
   packets.  Currently, work in the area of scoping has been limited.
   An Internet draft does exist that outlines the changes needed to
   routing protocols in order to support the IPv6 scoped addresses
   [SCOPE]. Currently, this work only addresses PIM running within a
   single site or organization.


6. Additional Areas of Work

   The main area of additional work is in the support of site- and
   organization-scoped IPv6 multicast addresses.  If a PIM domain is
   to cross an IPv6 scope domain, then guidelines for supporting the
   following will have to be developed :

    -  Scoped RP addresses

    -  Scoped DR addresses

    -  Scoped BSR addresses















Haberman, Kump, Sandick          Expires February 1998          [Page 3]


Internet Draft        PIM Multicast Routing for IPv6         Augest 1998


References


[RFC 2119] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
           Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, BCP14, March 1997.

[RFC 2373] R. Hinden and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
           Architecture", RFC 2373, July 1998.

[RFC 2375] R. Hinden and S. Deering, "IPv6 Multicast Address
           Assignments", RFC 2375, July 1998.

[SCOPE]    B. Haberman, "Routing of Site-Scoped Addresses in the
           Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)", currently
           draft-haberman-ipv6-site-route-00.txt.



Security Considerations

   This document does introduce any protocol changes that
   require any additional security considerations above and beyond those
   described in the original protocol specification documents.


Author's Address

        Brian Haberman
        IBM Corporation
        800 Park Office Drive
        Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
        USA
        +1-919-254-2673
        haberman@raleigh.ibm.com

        Garry Kump
        IBM Corporation
        800 Park Office Drive
        Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
        USA
        +1-919-254-2395
        kump@us.ibm.com

        Hal Sandick
        Bay Networks, Inc.
        1009 Slater Rd., Suite 220
        Durham, NC 27703
        USA



Haberman, Kump, Sandick          Expires February 1998          [Page 4]


Internet Draft        PIM Multicast Routing for IPv6         Augest 1998


        +1-919-941-1739
        hsandick@baynetworks.com

















































Haberman, Kump, Sandick          Expires February 1998          [Page 5]