Network Working Group J. Gould
Internet-Draft VeriSign, Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track S. Wodjenski
Expires: December 25, 2017 Neustar
June 23, 2017
Change Poll Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-02
Abstract
This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
extension for notifying clients of operations on client sponsored
objects that were not initiated by the client through EPP. These
operations MAY include contractual or policy requirements including
but not limited to regular batch processes, customer support actions,
Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) or Uniform Rapid
Suspension (URS) actions, court directed actions, and bulk updates
based on customer requests. Since the client is not directly
involved or knowledgable of these operations, the extension is used
along with an EPP object mapping to provide the resulting state of
the post-operation object, and optionally a pre-operation object,
with the operation meta-data of what, when, who, and why.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 25, 2017.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Object Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. Who . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. EPP Command Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1. EPP Query Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1.1. EPP <check> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1.2. EPP <info> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1.3. EPP <transfer> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.2. EPP Transform Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.2.1. EPP <create> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.2.2. EPP <delete> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.2.3. EPP <renew> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.2.4. EPP <transfer> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.2.5. EPP <update> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4. Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.1. Change Poll Extension Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.1. XML Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.2. EPP Extension Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
6. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
6.1. Verisign EPP SDK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
6.2. Verisign Consolidated Top Level Domain (CTLD) SRS . . . . 20
6.3. Verisign .COM / .NET SRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
9. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Appendix A. Change History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
A.1. Change from 00 to 01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
A.2. Change from 01 to 02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
A.3. Change from 02 to 03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
A.4. Change from 03 to 04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
A.5. Change from 04 to 05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
A.6. Change from 05 to REGEXT 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
A.7. Change from REGEXT 00 to REGEXT 01 . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
A.8. Change from REGEXT 01 to REGEXT 02 . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
1. Introduction
This document describes an extension mapping for version 1.0 of the
Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) [RFC5730]. This mapping, an
extension to EPP object mappings like the EPP domain name mapping
[RFC5731], is used to notify clients of operations they are not
directly involved in, on objects that the client sponsors. It is up
to server policy to determine what transform operations and clients
to notify. Using this extension clients can more easily keep their
systems in-sync with the objects stored in the server. When a change
occurs that a client needs to be notified of, a poll message can be
inserted by the server for consumption by the client using the EPP
<poll> command and response defined in [RFC5730]. The extension
supports including a "before" operation poll message and an "after"
operation poll message.
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
XML is case sensitive. Unless stated otherwise, XML specifications
and examples provided in this document MUST be interpreted in the
character case presented in order to develop a conforming
implementation.
In examples, "C:" represents lines sent by a protocol client and "S:"
represents lines returned by a protocol server. Indentation and
white space in examples are provided only to illustrate element
relationships and are not a REQUIRED feature of this protocol.
"changePoll-1.0" is used as an abbreviation for
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0". The XML namespace prefix
"changePoll" is used, but implementations MUST NOT depend on it and
instead employ a proper namespace-aware XML parser and serializer to
interpret and output the XML documents.
2. Object Attributes
This extension adds additional elements to EPP object mappings like
the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731]. Only those new elements are
described here.
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
2.1. Operation
An operation consists of any transform operation that impacts objects
that the client sponsers and SHOULD be notified of. The
<changePoll:operation> element defines the operation. The OPTIONAL
"op" attribute is used to define a sub-operation or the name of a
"custom" operation. The enumerated list of <changePoll:operation>
values include:
"create" Create operation as defined in [RFC5730].
"delete" Delete operation as defined in [RFC5730]. If the delete
operation results in an immediate purge of the object, then the
"op" attribute MUST be set to "purge".
"renew" Renew operation as defined in [RFC5730].
"transfer" Transfer operation as defined in [RFC5730] with the
OPTIONAL "op" attribute defining the transfer type with the
possible values of "request", "approve", "cancel", and "reject".
"update" Update operation as defined in [RFC5730].
"restore" Restore operation as defined in [RFC3915] with the
OPTIONAL "op" attribute defining the restore type with the
possible values of "request" and "report".
"autoRenew" Auto renew operation executed by the server.
"autoDelete" Auto delete operation executed by the server. If the
"autoDelete" operation results in an immediate purge of the
object, then the "op" attribute MUST be set to "purge".
"autoPurge" Auto purge operation executed by the server when
removing the object after it had the "pendingDelete" status.
"custom" Custom operation that uses the "op" attribute to define the
custom operation name.
2.2. Who
Who defines who executed the operation for audit purposes, and is
represented using the <changePoll:who> element. The scheme used for
the possible set of Who values is up to server policy. The server
MAY identify Who based on:
"Identifier" Unique user identifier of the user that executed the
operation. An example is "ClientX".
"Name" Name of the user that executed the operation. An example is
"John Doe".
"Role" Role of the user that executed operation. An example is
"CSR" for a Customer Support Representative or "Batch" for a
server batch.
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
3. EPP Command Mapping
A detailed description of the EPP syntax and semantics can be found
in the EPP core protocol specification [RFC5730].
3.1. EPP Query Commands
EPP provides three commands to retrieve object information: <check>
to determine if an object is known to the server, <info> to retrieve
detailed information associated with an object, and <transfer> to
retrieve object transfer status information.
3.1.1. EPP <check> Command
This extension does not add any elements to the EPP <check> command
or <check> response described in the [RFC5730].
3.1.2. EPP <info> Command
This extension does not add any elements to the EPP <info> command
described in the [RFC5730].
This extension adds transaction detail of the operations to the EPP
<info> poll response, as described in [RFC5730], of an EPP Object
Mapping like [RFC5731]. Any transform operation to an object defined
in an EPP Object Mapping, by a client other than the sponsoring
client, MAY result in extending the <info> response of the object for
inserting an EPP poll message with the operation detail. The
sponsoring client will then receive the state of the object with
operation detail like what, who, when, and why the object was
changed. The <changePoll:changeData> element contains the operation
detail along with an indication of whether the object reflects the
state before or after the operation, using the OPTIONAL "state"
attribute, with the possible values of "before" or "after", and with
a default value of "after". The "state" attribute describes the
state of the response data or <resData> block returned in the poll
response. The server MAY support providing the "before" state and
"after" state to the operation, by using one poll message for the
"before" state and one poll message for the "after" state. When
using the "before" state poll message, it MUST be inserted prior to
the "after" state poll message. The <changePoll:changeData> element
includes the operation detail with the following child elements:
<changePoll:operation> Transform operation executed on the object as
defined in Section 2.1.
<changePoll:date> Date and time when the operation was executed.
<changePoll:svTRID> Server transaction identifier of the operation.
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
<changePoll:who> Who executed the operation as defined in
Section 2.2.
<changePoll:caseId> OPTIONAL case identifer associated with the
operation. The required "type" attribute defines the type of
case with an enumerated list of case types including:
udrp a Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP)
case.
urs a Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) case.
custom A custom case that is defined using the "name" attribute.
<changePoll:reason> OPTIONAL reason for executing the operation. If
present, this element contains the server-specific text to help
explain the reason the operation was executed. This text MUST be
represented in the response language previously negotiated with
the client; an OPTIONAL "lang" attribute MAY be present to
identify the language if the negotiated value is something other
than the default value of "en" (English).
Example poll <info> response with the <changePoll:changeData>
extension for a URS lock transaction on the domain.example domain
name, with the "before" state. The "before" state is reflected in
the <resData> block:
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
S: <response>
S: <result code="1301">
S: <msg lang="en-US">
S: Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue</msg>
S: </result>
S: <msgQ id="201" count="1">
S: <qDate>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</qDate>
S: <msg>Registry initiated update of domain.</msg>
S: </msgQ>
S: <resData>
S: <domain:infData
S: xmlns:domain="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:domain-1.0">
S: <domain:name>domain.example</domain:name>
S: <domain:roid>EXAMPLE1-REP</domain:roid>
S: <domain:status s="ok"/>
S: <domain:registrant>jd1234</domain:registrant>
S: <domain:contact type="admin">sh8013</domain:contact>
S: <domain:contact type="tech">sh8013</domain:contact>
S: <domain:clID>ClientX</domain:clID>
S: <domain:crID>ClientY</domain:crID>
S: <domain:crDate>2012-04-03T22:00:00.0Z</domain:crDate>
S: <domain:exDate>2014-04-03T22:00:00.0Z</domain:exDate>
S: </domain:infData>
S: </resData>
S: <extension>
S: <changePoll:changeData
S: xmlns:changePoll="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0"
S: state="before">
S: <changePoll:operation>update</changePoll:operation>
S: <changePoll:date>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</changePoll:date>
S: <changePoll:svTRID>12345-XYZ</changePoll:svTRID>
S: <changePoll:who>URS Admin</changePoll:who>
S: <changePoll:caseId type="urs">urs123</changePoll:caseId>
S: <changePoll:reason>URS Lock</changePoll:reason>
S: </changePoll:changeData>
S: </extension>
S: <trID>
S: <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
S: <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
S: </trID>
S: </response>
S:</epp>
Example poll <info> response with the <changePoll:changeData>
extension for a URS lock transaction on the domain.example domain
name, with the "after" state. The "after" state is reflected in the
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
<resData> block:
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
S: <response>
S: <result code="1301">
S: <msg lang="en-US">
S: Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue</msg>
S: </result>
S: <msgQ id="202" count="1">
S: <qDate>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</qDate>
S: <msg>Registry initiated update of domain.</msg>
S: </msgQ>
S: <resData>
S: <domain:infData
S: xmlns:domain="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:domain-1.0">
S: <domain:name>domain.example</domain:name>
S: <domain:roid>EXAMPLE1-REP</domain:roid>
S: <domain:status s="serverUpdateProhibited"/>
S: <domain:status s="serverDeleteProhibited"/>
S: <domain:status s="serverTransferProhibited"/>
S: <domain:registrant>jd1234</domain:registrant>
S: <domain:contact type="admin">sh8013</domain:contact>
S: <domain:contact type="tech">sh8013</domain:contact>
S: <domain:clID>ClientX</domain:clID>
S: <domain:crID>ClientY</domain:crID>
S: <domain:crDate>2012-04-03T22:00:00.0Z</domain:crDate>
S: <domain:upID>ClientZ</domain:upID>
S: <domain:upDate>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</domain:upDate>
S: <domain:exDate>2014-04-03T22:00:00.0Z</domain:exDate>
S: </domain:infData>
S: </resData>
S: <extension>
S: <changePoll:changeData
S: xmlns:changePoll="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0"
S: state="after">
S: <changePoll:operation>update</changePoll:operation>
S: <changePoll:date>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</changePoll:date>
S: <changePoll:svTRID>12345-XYZ</changePoll:svTRID>
S: <changePoll:who>URS Admin</changePoll:who>
S: <changePoll:caseId type="urs">urs123</changePoll:caseId>
S: <changePoll:reason>URS Lock</changePoll:reason>
S: </changePoll:changeData>
S: </extension>
S: <trID>
S: <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
S: <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
S: </trID>
S: </response>
S:</epp>
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
Example poll <info> response with the <changePoll:changeData>
extension for a custom "sync" operation on the domain.example domain
name, with the default "after" state. The "after" state is reflected
in the <resData> block:
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
S: <response>
S: <result code="1301">
S: <msg>Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue</msg>
S: </result>
S: <msgQ id="201" count="1">
S: <qDate>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</qDate>
S: <msg>Registry initiated Sync of Domain Expiration Date</msg>
S: </msgQ>
S: <resData>
S: <domain:infData
S: xmlns:domain="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:domain-1.0">
S: <domain:name>domain.example</domain:name>
S: <domain:roid>EXAMPLE1-REP</domain:roid>
S: <domain:status s="ok"/>
S: <domain:registrant>jd1234</domain:registrant>
S: <domain:contact type="admin">sh8013</domain:contact>
S: <domain:contact type="tech">sh8013</domain:contact>
S: <domain:clID>ClientX</domain:clID>
S: <domain:crID>ClientY</domain:crID>
S: <domain:crDate>2012-04-03T22:00:00.0Z</domain:crDate>
S: <domain:upID>ClientZ</domain:upID>
S: <domain:upDate>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</domain:upDate>
S: <domain:exDate>2014-04-03T22:00:00.0Z</domain:exDate>
S: </domain:infData>
S: </resData>
S: <extension>
S: <changePoll:changeData
S: xmlns:changePoll="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0">
S: <changePoll:operation op="sync">custom
S: </changePoll:operation>
S: <changePoll:date>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</changePoll:date>
S: <changePoll:svTRID>12345-XYZ</changePoll:svTRID>
S: <changePoll:who>CSR</changePoll:who>
S: <changePoll:reason lang="en">Customer sync request
S: </changePoll:reason>
S: </changePoll:changeData>
S: </extension>
S: <trID>
S: <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
S: <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
S: </trID>
S: </response>
S:</epp>
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
Example poll <info> response with the <changePoll:changeData>
extension for a "delete" operation on the domain.example domain name
that is immediately purged, with the default "after" state. The
"after" state is reflected in the <resData> block:
S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
S: <response>
S: <result code="1301">
S: <msg>Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue</msg>
S: </result>
S: <msgQ id="200" count="1">
S: <qDate>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</qDate>
S: <msg>Registry initiated delete of
S: domain resulting in immediate purge.</msg>
S: </msgQ>
S: <resData>
S: <domain:infData
S: xmlns:domain="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:domain-1.0">
S: <domain:name>domain.example</domain:name>
S: <domain:roid>EXAMPLE1-REP</domain:roid>
S: <domain:clID>ClientX</domain:clID>
S: </domain:infData>
S: </resData>
S: <extension>
S: <changePoll:changeData
S: xmlns:changePoll="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0">
S: <changePoll:operation op="purge">
S: delete</changePoll:operation>
S: <changePoll:date>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</changePoll:date>
S: <changePoll:svTRID>12345-XYZ</changePoll:svTRID>
S: <changePoll:who>ClientZ</changePoll:who>
S: <changePoll:reason>Court order</changePoll:reason>
S: </changePoll:changeData>
S: </extension>
S: <trID>
S: <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
S: <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
S: </trID>
S: </response>
S:</epp>
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
Example poll <info> response with the <changePoll:changeData>
extension for an "autoPurge" operation on the domain.example domain
name that previously had the "pendingDelete" status, with the default
"after" state. The "after" state is reflected in the <resData>
block:
S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
S: <response>
S: <result code="1301">
S: <msg>Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue</msg>
S: </result>
S: <msgQ id="200" count="1">
S: <qDate>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</qDate>
S: <msg>Registry purged domain with pendingDelete status.</msg>
S: </msgQ>
S: <resData>
S: <domain:infData
S: xmlns:domain="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:domain-1.0">
S: <domain:name>domain.example</domain:name>
S: <domain:roid>EXAMPLE1-REP</domain:roid>
S: <domain:clID>ClientX</domain:clID>
S: </domain:infData>
S: </resData>
S: <extension>
S: <changePoll:changeData
S: xmlns:changePoll="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0">
S: <changePoll:operation>
S: autoPurge</changePoll:operation>
S: <changePoll:date>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</changePoll:date>
S: <changePoll:svTRID>12345-XYZ</changePoll:svTRID>
S: <changePoll:who>Batch</changePoll:who>
S: <changePoll:reason>
S: Past pendingDelete 5 day period
S: </changePoll:reason>
S: </changePoll:changeData>
S: </extension>
S: <trID>
S: <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
S: <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
S: </trID>
S: </response>
S:</epp>
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
Example poll <info> response with the <changePoll:changeData>
extension for an "update" operation on the ns1.domain.example host,
with the default "after" state. The "after" state is reflected in
the <resData> block:
S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
S: <response>
S: <result code="1301">
S: <msg>Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue</msg>
S: </result>
S: <msgQ id="201" count="1">
S: <qDate>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</qDate>
S: <msg>Registry initiated update of host.</msg>
S: </msgQ>
S: <resData>
S: <host:infData
S: xmlns:host="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:host-1.0">
S: <host:name>ns1.domain.example</host:name>
S: <host:roid>NS1_EXAMPLE1-REP</host:roid>
S: <host:status s="linked"/>
S: <host:status s="serverUpdateProhibited"/>
S: <host:status s="serverDeleteProhibited"/>
S: <host:addr ip="v4">192.0.2.2</host:addr>
S: <host:addr ip="v6">1080:0:0:0:8:800:200C:417A</host:addr>
S: <host:clID>ClientX</host:clID>
S: <host:crID>ClientY</host:crID>
S: <host:crDate>2012-04-03T22:00:00.0Z</host:crDate>
S: <host:upID>ClientY</host:upID>
S: <host:upDate>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</host:upDate>
S: </host:infData>
S: </resData>
S: <extension>
S: <changePoll:changeData
S: xmlns:changePoll="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0">
S: <changePoll:operation>update</changePoll:operation>
S: <changePoll:date>2013-10-22T14:25:57.0Z</changePoll:date>
S: <changePoll:svTRID>12345-XYZ</changePoll:svTRID>
S: <changePoll:who>ClientZ</changePoll:who>
S: <changePoll:reason>Host Lock</changePoll:reason>
S: </changePoll:changeData>
S: </extension>
S: <trID>
S: <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
S: <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
S: </trID>
S: </response>
S:</epp>
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
3.1.3. EPP <transfer> Command
This extension does not add any elements to the EPP <transfer> query
command or <transfer> response described in the [RFC5730].
3.2. EPP Transform Commands
EPP provides five commands to transform objects: <create> to create
an instance of an object, <delete> to delete an instance of an
object, <renew> to extend the validity period of an object,
<transfer> to manage object sponsorship changes, and <update> to
change information associated with an object.
3.2.1. EPP <create> Command
This extension does not add any elements to the EPP <create> command
or <create> response described in the [RFC5730].
3.2.2. EPP <delete> Command
This extension does not add any elements to the EPP <delete> command
or <delete> response described in the [RFC5730].
3.2.3. EPP <renew> Command
This extension does not add any elements to the EPP <renew> command
or <renew> response described in the [RFC5730].
3.2.4. EPP <transfer> Command
This extension does not add any elements to the EPP <transfer>
command or <transfer> response described in the [RFC5730].
3.2.5. EPP <update> Command
This extension does not add any elements to the EPP <update> command
or <update> response described in the [RFC5730].
4. Formal Syntax
One schema is presented here that is the EPP Change Poll Extension
schema.
The formal syntax presented here is a complete schema representation
of the object mapping suitable for automated validation of EPP XML
instances. The BEGIN and END tags are not part of the schema; they
are used to note the beginning and ending of the schema for URI
registration purposes.
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
4.1. Change Poll Extension Schema
BEGIN
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0"
xmlns:eppcom="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eppcom-1.0"
xmlns:epp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0"
xmlns:changePoll="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<!--
Import common element types.
-->
<import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eppcom-1.0"/>
<import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0"/>
<annotation>
<documentation>
Extensible Provisioning Protocol v1.0
Change Poll Mapping Schema.
</documentation>
</annotation>
<!--
Change element.
-->
<element name="changeData" type="changePoll:changeDataType"/>
<!--
Attributes associated with the change.
-->
<complexType name="changeDataType">
<sequence>
<element name="operation" type="changePoll:operationType"/>
<element name="date" type="dateTime"/>
<element name="svTRID" type="epp:trIDStringType"/>
<element name="who" type="changePoll:whoType"/>
<element name="caseId" type="changePoll:caseIdType"
minOccurs="0"/>
<element name="reason" type="eppcom:reasonType"
minOccurs="0"/>
</sequence>
<attribute name="state" type="changePoll:stateType"
default="after"/>
</complexType>
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
<!--
Enumerated list of operations, with extensibility via "custom".
-->
<simpleType name="operationEnum">
<restriction base="token">
<enumeration value="create"/>
<enumeration value="delete"/>
<enumeration value="renew"/>
<enumeration value="transfer"/>
<enumeration value="update"/>
<enumeration value="restore"/>
<enumeration value="autoRenew"/>
<enumeration value="autoDelete"/>
<enumeration value="autoPurge"/>
<enumeration value="custom"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<!--
Enumerated of state of the object in the poll message.
-->
<simpleType name="stateType">
<restriction base="token">
<enumeration value="before"/>
<enumeration value="after"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<!--
Transform operation type
-->
<complexType name="operationType">
<simpleContent>
<extension base="changePoll:operationEnum">
<attribute name="op" type="token"/>
</extension>
</simpleContent>
</complexType>
<!--
Case identifier type
-->
<complexType name="caseIdType">
<simpleContent>
<extension base="token">
<attribute name="type" type="changePoll:caseTypeEnum"
use="required"/>
<attribute name="name" type="token"
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
use="optional"/>
</extension>
</simpleContent>
</complexType>
<!--
Enumerated list of case identifier types
-->
<simpleType name="caseTypeEnum">
<restriction base="token">
<enumeration value="udrp"/>
<enumeration value="urs"/>
<enumeration value="custom"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<!--
Who type
-->
<simpleType name="whoType">
<restriction base="normalizedString">
<minLength value="1"/>
<maxLength value="255"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<!--
End of schema.
-->
</schema>
END
5. IANA Considerations
5.1. XML Namespace
This document uses URNs to describe XML namespaces and XML schemas
conforming to a registry mechanism described in [RFC3688]. The
following URI assignment is requested of IANA:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0
Registrant Contact: See the "Author's Address" section of this
document.
XML: See the "Formal Syntax" section of this document.
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
5.2. EPP Extension Registry
The EPP extension described in this document should be registered by
the IANA in the EPP Extension Registry described in [RFC7451]. The
details of the registration are as follows:
Name of Extension: "Change Poll Extension for the Extensible
Provisioning Protocol (EPP)"
Document status: Standards Track
Reference: (insert reference to RFC version of this document)
Registrant Name and Email Address: IESG, <iesg@ietf.org>
TLDs: Any
IPR Disclosure: None
Status: Active
Notes: None
6. Implementation Status
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove this section and the reference to
RFC 6982 [RFC6982] before publication.
This section records the status of known implementations of the
protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this
Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in RFC 6982
[RFC6982]. The description of implementations in this section is
intended to assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing
drafts to RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual
implementation here does not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Furthermore, no effort has been spent to verify the information
presented here that was supplied by IETF contributors. This is not
intended as, and must not be construed to be, a catalog of available
implementations or their features. Readers are advised to note that
other implementations may exist.
According to RFC 6982 [RFC6982], "this will allow reviewers and
working groups to assign due consideration to documents that have the
benefit of running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable
experimentation and feedback that have made the implemented protocols
more mature. It is up to the individual working groups to use this
information as they see fit".
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
6.1. Verisign EPP SDK
Organization: Verisign Inc.
Name: Verisign EPP SDK
Description: The Verisign EPP SDK includes both a full client
implementation and a full server stub implementation of draft-ietf-
regext-change-poll.
Level of maturity: Production
Coverage: All aspects of the protocol are implemented.
Licensing: GNU Lesser General Public License
Contact: jgould@verisign.com
URL: https://www.verisign.com/en_US/channel-resources/domain-
registry-products/epp-sdks
6.2. Verisign Consolidated Top Level Domain (CTLD) SRS
Organization: Verisign Inc.
Name: Verisign Consolidated Top Level Domain (CTLD) Shared Registry
System (SRS)
Description: The Verisign Consolidated Top Level Domain (CTLD) Shared
Registry System (SRS) implements the server-side of draft-ietf-
regext-change-poll for a variety of Top Level Domains (TLD's).
Level of maturity: Production
Coverage: The "after" state poll message for an "update" transform
operation of a domain name due to server policy.
Licensing: Proprietary
Contact: jgould@verisign.com
6.3. Verisign .COM / .NET SRS
Organization: Verisign Inc.
Name: Verisign .COM / .NET Shared Registry System (SRS)
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
Description: The Verisign Shared Registry System (SRS) for .COM and
.NET implements the server-side of draft-ietf-regext-change-poll.
Level of maturity: Production
Coverage: The "after" state poll message for an "update" transform
operation of a domain name due to server policy.
Licensing: Proprietary
Contact: jgould@verisign.com
7. Security Considerations
The mapping extensions described in this document do not provide any
security services beyond those described by EPP [RFC5730] and
protocol layers used by EPP. The security considerations described
in these other specifications apply to this specification as well.
8. Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the original concept for this draft
and the efforts in the initial versions of this draft by Trung Tran.
Special suggestions that have been incorporated into this document
were provided by Michael Holloway.
9. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC3915] Hollenbeck, S., "Domain Registry Grace Period Mapping for
the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)", RFC 3915,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3915, September 2004,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3915>.
[RFC5730] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)",
STD 69, RFC 5730, DOI 10.17487/RFC5730, August 2009,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5730>.
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
[RFC5731] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Domain Name Mapping", STD 69, RFC 5731,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5731, August 2009,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5731>.
[RFC6982] Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running
Code: The Implementation Status Section", RFC 6982,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6982, July 2013,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6982>.
[RFC7451] Hollenbeck, S., "Extension Registry for the Extensible
Provisioning Protocol", RFC 7451, DOI 10.17487/RFC7451,
February 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7451>.
Appendix A. Change History
A.1. Change from 00 to 01
1. Added an optional caseId element that defines the case identifier
from UDRP, URS, or custom case, based on feedback from Michael
Holloway.
A.2. Change from 01 to 02
1. Amended XML Namespace section of IANA Considerations, added EPP
Extension Registry section.
2. Moved Change History to the back section as an Appendix.
A.3. Change from 02 to 03
1. Fixed "before" state example to use the "before" state value
based on feedback from Patrick Mevzek.
A.4. Change from 03 to 04
1. Updated the authors for the draft.
A.5. Change from 04 to 05
1. Ping update.
A.6. Change from 05 to REGEXT 00
1. Changed to regext working group draft by changing draft-gould-
change-poll to draft-ietf-regext-change-poll.
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft changePoll June 2017
A.7. Change from REGEXT 00 to REGEXT 01
1. Ping update.
A.8. Change from REGEXT 01 to REGEXT 02
1. Added the Implementation Status section.
Authors' Addresses
James Gould
VeriSign, Inc.
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
US
Email: jgould@verisign.com
URI: http://www.verisigninc.com
Sharon Wodjenski
Neustar
21575 Ridgetop Circle
Sterling, VA 20166
US
Email: Sharon.Wodjenski@neustar.biz
URI: http://www.neustar.biz
Gould & Wodjenski Expires December 25, 2017 [Page 23]
