SACM Working Group D. Waltermire
Internet-Draft S. Banghart
Intended status: InformationalNational Institute of Standards and Techno
Expires: September 22, 2018 March 21, 2018
Definition of the ROLIE Software Descriptor Extension
draft-ietf-sacm-rolie-softwaredescriptor-02
Abstract
This document extends the Resource-Oriented Lightweight Information
Exchange (ROLIE) core to add the information type category and
related requirements needed to support Software Record and Software
Inventory use cases. The 'software-descriptor' information type is
defined as a ROLIE extension. Additional supporting requirements are
also defined that describe the use of specific formats and link
relations pertaining to the new information type.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 22, 2018.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Information-type Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. The "software-descriptor" information type . . . . . . . 4
4. rolie:property Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1. urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:swd:id . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2. urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:swd:swname . . . . . . . . 5
5. Use of the rolie:format element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.1. The ISO SWID 2015 format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.1.1. Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.1.2. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.2. The Concise SWID format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.2.1. Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5.2.2. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6. atom:link Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7.1. Media Type Registrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7.1.1. ISO SWID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7.2. software-descriptor information-type . . . . . . . . . . 9
7.3. swd:id property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7.4. swd:swname property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9. Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
10. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Appendix A. Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Appendix B. Examples of Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1. Introduction
This document defines an extension to the Resource-Oriented
Lightweight Information Exchange (ROLIE) [RFC8322] protocol to
support the publication of software descriptor information. Software
descriptor information is information that characterizes:
an installable software package, or
information about static software components that may be installed
by a software package or patch.
Software descriptor information includes identifying, versioning,
software creation and publication, and file artifact information.
Software descriptor information provides data about what might be
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
installed, but doesn't describe where or how a specific software
installation is installed, configured, or executed.
Some possible use cases for Software descriptor information include:
o Software providers can publish software descriptor information so
that software researchers and users of software can understand the
collection of software produced by a that software provider.
o Organizations can aggregate and syndicate collections of software
descriptor information provided by multiple software providers to
support software-related analysis processes (e.g., vulnerability
analysis) and value added information (e.g., software
configuration checklist repositories) using identification and
characterization information derived from software descriptor
information.
o End user organizations can consume sources of software descriptor
information, and other related software vulnerability and
configuration information to provide the data needed to automate
software asset, patch, and configuration management practices.
o Organizations can use software descriptors to support verification
of other entities, thru mechanisms such as RIM or other integrity
measurements.
This document supports these use cases by describing the content
requirements for Collections and Entries of software descriptor
information that are to be published to or retrieved from a ROLIE
repository. This document also discusses requirements around the use
of atom:link and rolie:format.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST," "MUST NOT," "REQUIRED," "SHALL," "SHALL NOT,"
"SHOULD," "SHOULD NOT," "RECOMMENDED," "MAY," and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Definitions for some of the common computer security-related
terminology used in this document can be found in Section 2 of
[RFC5070].
3. Information-type Extensions
This document defines the following information type[s]:
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
3.1. The "software-descriptor" information type
The "software-descriptor" information type represents any information
that describes a piece of software. This document uses the
definition of software provided by [RFC4949]. Note that as per this
definition, this information type pertains to static software, that
is, code on the disc. The software-descriptor information type is
intended to provide a category for information that does one or more
of the following:
identifies and characterizes software: This software identification
and characterization information can be provided by a large
variety of data, but always describes software in a pre-installed
state.
provides software installer metadata: This represents information
about software used to install other software. This metadata
identifies, and characterizes a software installation package or
media.
describes stateless installation metadata: Information that
describes the software post-deployment, such as files that may be
deployed during an installation. It is expected that this
metadata is produced generally for a given installation, and may
not exactly match the actual installed files on a given endpoint.
Provided below is a non-exhaustive list of information that may be
considered to be of a software-descriptor information type.
o Naming information: IDs and names that aid in the identification
of a piece of software
o Version and patching information: Version numbers, patch
identifiers, or other information that
o Vendor and source information: Includes where the software was
developed or distributed from, as well as where the software
installation media may be located.
o Payload and file information: information that describes or
enumerates the files and folders that make up the piece of
software, and information about those files.
o Descriptive information and data: Any information that otherwise
characterizes a piece of software, such as libraries, runtime
environments, target OSes, intended purpose or audience, etc.
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
Note again that this list is not exhaustive, any information that in
is the abstract realm of an incident should be classified under this
information-type.
This information type does not include descriptions of running
software, or state and configuration information that is associated
with a software installation.
4. rolie:property Extensions
This document registers new valid rolie:property names as follows:
4.1. urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:swd:id
This property provides an exposure point for an identification field
from the associated software descriptor. The value of this property
SHOULD be uniquely identifying information generated from the
software descriptor linked to by the entry's atom:content element.
swd:id property values SHOULD have a one-to-one mapping to individual
pieces of SWD content.
4.2. urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:swd:swname
This property provides an exposure point for the plain text name of
the software being described. Due to the great variance in naming
schemes, this property should be considered informative.
5. Use of the rolie:format element
This section defines usage guidance and additional requirements on
the rolie:format element above and beyond those specified in RFC8322.
The following formats are expected to be commonly used to express
software descriptor information. For this reason, this document
specifies additional requirements to ensure interoperability.
5.1. The ISO SWID 2015 format
5.1.1. Description
ISO/IEC 19770-2:2015 defines a software record data format refered to
as a "SWID Tag". It provides several tag types:
o primary: provides descriptive and naming information about
software,
o patch: describes non-standalone software meant to patch existing
software,
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
o corpus:describes the software installation media that installs a
given piece of software,
o supplemental: provides additional metadata to be deployed
alongside a tag.
For a more complete overview as well as normative requirements, refer
to ISO/IEC 19770-2:2015 [SWID].
For additional requirements and guidance around creation of SWID
Tags, consult NIST Internal Report 8060 [NISTIR8060].
5.1.2. Requirements
For an Entry to be considered as a "SWID Tag Entry", it MUST fulfill
the following conditions:
o The information type of the Entry is "software-descriptor". For a
typical Entry, this is derived from the information type of the
Feed it is contained in. For a standalone Entry, this is provided
by an atom:category element.
o The document linked to by the "href" attribute of the atom:content
element is a SWID Tag as per ISO/IEC 19770-2:2015.
A "SWID Tag Entry" MUST conform to the following requirements:
o The value of the "type" attribute of the atom:content element MUST
be "application/swid2015+xml".
o There MUST be one rolie:property with the "name" attribute equal
to "urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:swd:id" and the "value"
attribute exactly equal to the "<tagid>" element in the attached
SWID Tag. This allows for ROLIE consumers to more easily search
for SWID tags without needing to download the tag itself.
o There MUST be one rolie:property with the "name" attribute equal
to "urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:swd:swname", and the "value"
attribute equal to the value of the "<name>" element in the
attached SWID Tag. As above, this field aids ROLIE consumers in
search and filtering Entries.
5.2. The Concise SWID format
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
5.2.1. Description
The Concise SWID (COSWID) format is an alternative representation of
the SWID Tag format using a Concise Binary Object Representation
(CBOR) encoding. This provides the format with a reduced size that
is more sutiable for constrained devices. It provides the same
features and attributes as are specified in ISO 19770-2:2015, plus:
o a straight forward method to sign and encrypt using COSE, and
o additional attributes that provide an improved structure to
include file hashes intended to be used as Reference Integrity
Measurements (RIM).
For more information and the complete specification, refer to the
COSWID internet draft [I-D.ietf-sacm-coswid].
5.2.2. Requirements
For an Entry to be considered as a "COSWID Tag Entry", it MUST
fulfill the following conditions:
o The information type of the Entry is "software-descriptor". For a
typical Entry, this is derived from the information type of the
Feed it is contained in. For a standalone Entry, this is provided
by an atom:category element.
o The document linked to by the "href" attribute of the atom:content
element is a COSWID Tag as per [I-D.ietf-sacm-coswid]
A "COSWID Tag Entry" MUST conform to the following requirements:
o The value of the "type" attribute of the atom:content element MUST
be "application/coswid+cbor".
o There MUST be one rolie:property with the "name" attribute equal
to "urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:swd:id" and the "value"
attribute exactly equal to the "tag-id" element in the attached
COSWID Tag. This allows for ROLIE consumers to more easily search
for COSWID tags without needing to download the tag itself.
o There MUST be one rolie:property with the "name" attribute equal
to "urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:swd:swname", and the "value"
attribute equal to the value of the "swid-name" element in the
attached COSWID Tag. As above, this field aids ROLIE consumers in
searching and filtering Entries.
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
6. atom:link Extensions
This section defines additonal link relationships that
implementations MUST support. These relationships are not registed
in the Link Relation IANA table as their use case is too narrow.
Each relationship is named and described.
+--------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Name | Description |
+--------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| ancestor | Links to a software descriptor resource that |
| | defines an ancestor of the software being |
| | described by this Entry. This is usually a |
| | previous version of the software. |
| patches | Links to a software descriptor resource that |
| | defines the software being patched by this |
| | software |
| requires | Links to a software descriptor resource that |
| | defines a piece of software required for |
| | this software to function properly, i.e., a |
| | dependencecy. |
| installs | Links to a software descriptor resource that |
| | defines the software that is installed by |
| | this software. |
| installationrecord | Links to a software descriptor resource that |
| | defines the software package that installs |
| | this software. |
+--------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Table 1: Link Relations for Resource-Oriented Lightweight Indicator
Exchange
7. IANA Considerations
7.1. Media Type Registrations
7.1.1. ISO SWID
This document registers a MIME Type for the SWID Tag format. The
registration is as follows
MIME media type name: application
MIME subtype name: swid2015+xml
Mandatory parameters: None.
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
Optional parameters: "charset": This parameter has semantics
identical to the charset parameter of the "application/xml" media
type as specified in [RFC3023].
Encoding considerations: Identical to those of "application/xml" as
described in [RFC3023], Section 3.2.
Security considerations: As defined in this specification, and in
[RFC8322]. In addition, as this media type uses the "+xml"
convention, it shares the same security considerations as described
in [RFC3023], Section 10.
Interoperability considerations: There are no known interoperability
issues.
Published specification: This specification.
Applications that use this media type: No known applications
currently use this media type.
Additional information:
Magic number(s): As specified for "application/xml" in [RFC3023],
Section 3.2.
File extension: .swidtag
Fragment identifiers: As specified for "application/xml" in
[RFC3023], Section 5.
Base URI: As specified in [RFC3023], Section 6.
Macintosh File Type code: TEXT
Person and email address to contact for further information: Stephen
Banghart <stephen.banghart@nist.gov>
Intended usage: COMMON
Author/Change controller: IESG
7.2. software-descriptor information-type
IANA has added an entry to the "ROLIE Security Resource Information
Type Sub-Registry" registry located at
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/rolie/category/information-type> .
The entry is as follows:
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
name: software-descriptor
index: TBD
reference: This document, Section 3.1
7.3. swd:id property
IANA has added an entry to the "ROLIE URN Parameters" registry
located in <https://www.iana.org/assignments/rolie/>.
The entry is as follows:
name: property:swd:id
Extension IRI: urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:swd:id
Reference: This document, Section 4.1
Subregistry: None
7.4. swd:swname property
IANA has added an entry to the "ROLIE URN Parameters" registry
located in <https://www.iana.org/assignments/rolie/>.
The entry is as follows:
name: property:swd:swname
Extension IRI: urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:swd:swname
Reference: This document, Section 4.2
Subregistry: None
8. Security Considerations
Use of this extension implies dealing with the security implications
of both ROLIE and of software descriptors in general. As with any
SWD information, care should be taken to verify the trustworthiness
and veracity of the descriptor information to the fullest extent
possible.
Ideally, software descriptors should have been signed by the software
manufacturer, or signed by whichever agent processed the source code.
SWD documents from these sources are more likely to be accurate than
those generated by scraping installed software.
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
These "authoritative" sources of SWD content should consider
additional security for their ROLIE repository beyond the typical
recommendations, as the central importance of the repository is
likely to make it a target.
Version information is often represented differently across
manufacturers and even across product releases. If using SWD version
information for low fault tolerance comparisons and searches, care
should be taken that the correct version scheme is being utilized.
9. Privacy Considerations
This extension does not introduce any privacy considerations above or
beyond that of the core ROLIE document. Any implementations using
this extension should understand the privacy considerations of ROLIE
and the Atom Publishing Protocol.
10. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-sacm-coswid]
Birkholz, H., Fitzgerald-McKay, J., Schmidt, C., and D.
Waltermire, "Concise Software Identifiers", draft-ietf-
sacm-coswid-05 (work in progress), March 2018.
[NISTIR8060]
Waltermire, D., Cheikes, B., Feldman, L., and G. Witte,
"Guidelines for the Creation of Interoperable Software
Identification (SWID) Tags", NISTIR 8060, April 2016,
<https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8060>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4949] Shirey, R., "Internet Security Glossary, Version 2",
FYI 36, RFC 4949, DOI 10.17487/RFC4949, August 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4949>.
[RFC5070] Danyliw, R., Meijer, J., and Y. Demchenko, "The Incident
Object Description Exchange Format", RFC 5070,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5070, December 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5070>.
[RFC8322] Field, J., Banghart, S., and D. Waltermire, "Resource-
Oriented Lightweight Information Exchange (ROLIE)",
RFC 8322, DOI 10.17487/RFC8322, February 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8322>.
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
[SWID] "Information technology - Software asset management - Part
2: Software identification tag", ISO/IEC 19770-2:2015,
October 2015.
Appendix A. Schema
This document does not require any schema extensions.
Appendix B. Examples of Use
Use of this extension in a ROLIE repository will not typically change
that repository's operation. As such, the general examples provided
by the ROLIE core document would serve as examples. Provided below
is a sample SWD ROLIE entry:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:rolie="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rolie-1.0">
<id>dd786dba-88e6-440b-9158-b8fae67ef67c</id>
<title>Sample Software Descriptor</title>
<published>2015-08-04T18:13:51.0Z</published>
<updated>2015-08-05T18:13:51.0Z</updated>
<summary>A descriptor for a piece of software published by this
organization. </summary>
<link rel="self" href="http://www.example.org/provider/SWD/123456"/>
<category
scheme="urn:ietf:params:rolie:category:information-type"
term="software-descriptor"/>
<rolie:format ns="urn:example:COSWID"/>
<content type="application/xml"
src="http://www.example.org/provider/SWD/123456/data"/>
</entry>
Authors' Addresses
David Waltermire
National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877
USA
Email: david.waltermire@nist.gov
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft ROLIE SWD EXT March 2018
Stephen Banghart
National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877
USA
Email: stephen.banghart@nist.gov
Waltermire & Banghart Expires September 22, 2018 [Page 13]