MPLS Working Group K. Raza
Internet-Draft R. Asati
Intended status: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc.
Expires: January 9, 2017
X. Liu
Ericsson
S. Esale
Juniper Networks
X. Chen
Huawei Technologies
H. Shah
Ciena Corporation
July 8, 2016
YANG Data Model for MPLS LDP and mLDP
draft-raza-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang-04
Abstract
This document describes a YANG data model for Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (MPLS) Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) and Multipoint LDP
(mLDP).
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 9, 2017.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Specification of Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. LDP YANG Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.2.1. Configuration Hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.2.2. All-VRFs Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.3. Operational State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.3.1. Derived States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.4. Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.5. Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4. mLDP YANG Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.2. Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.2.1. Configuration Hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.2.2. mldp container . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4.2.3. Leveraging LDP containers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.2.4. YANG tree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.3. Operational State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.3.1. Derived states . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4.4. Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4.5. Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
5. Open Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6. YANG Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
9. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
Appendix A. Additional Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
1. Introduction
The Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) [RFC6241] is one of the
network management protocols that defines mechanisms to manage
network devices. YANG [RFC6020] is a modular language that
represents data structures in an XML tree format, and is used as a
data modelling language for the NETCONF.
This document introduces a YANG data model for MPLS Label
Distribution Protocol (LDP) [RFC5036] and Multipoint LDP (mLDP)
[RFC6388]. For LDP, it also covers LDP IPv6 [RFC7552] and LDP
capabilities [RFC5561].
The data model is defined for following constructs that are used for
managing the protocol:
o Configuration
o Operational State
o Executables (Actions)
o Notifications
This document is organized to define the data model for each of the
above constructs (configuration, state, action, and notifications) in
the sequence as listed earlier. Given that mLDP is tightly coupled
with LDP, mLDP data model is defined under LDP tree and in the same
sequence as listed above.
2. Specification of Requirements
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
In this document, the word "IP" is used to refer to both IPv4 and
IPv6, unless otherwise explicitly stated. For example, "IP address
family" means and be read as "IPv4 and/or IPv6 address family"
3. LDP YANG Model
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
3.1. Overview
This document defines a new module named "ietf-mpls-ldp" for LDP/mLDP
data model where this module augments /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-
protocols that is defined in [I-D.ietf-netmod-routing-cfg].
There are four main containers in "ietf-mpls-ldp" module as follows:
o Read-Write parameters for configuration (Discussed in Section 3.2)
o Read-only parameters for operational state (Discussed in
Section 3.3)
o Notifications for events (Discussed in Section 3.4)
o RPCs for executing commands to perform some action (Discussed in
Section 3.5)
For the configuration and state data, this model follows the similar
approach described in [I-D.openconfig-netmod-opstate] to represent
the configuration (intended state) and operational (applied and
derived) state. This means that for every configuration (rw) item,
there is an associated (ro) item under "state" container to represent
the applied state. Furthermore, protocol derived state is also kept
under "state" tree corresponding to the protocol area (discovery,
peer etc.). [Ed note: This document will be (re-)aligned with
[I-D.openconfig-netmod-opstate] once that specification is adopted as
a WG document]
Following diagram depicts high level LDP yang tree organization and
hierarchy:
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
module: ietf-mpls-ldp
+-- rw routing
+-- rw control-plane-protocols
+-- rw mpls-ldp
+-- rw global
| +-- rw config
| +-- rw ...
| +-- ro state
| +-- ro ...
| .
+-- rw ...
|
|
+-- rw ...
...
rpcs:
+-- x mpls-ldp-rpc
+-- x . . . . .
notifications:
+--- n mpls-ldp-notif
+--- n ...
Figure 1
Before going into data model details, it is important to take note of
the following points:
o This module aims to address only the core LDP/mLDP parameters as
per RFC specification, as well as some widely used and deployed
non-RFC features (such as label policies, session authentication
etc). Any vendor specific feature should be defined in a vendor-
specific augmentation of this model.
o Multi-topology LDP [RFC7307] and Multi-topology mLDP
[I-D.iwijnand-mpls-mldp-multi-topology] are beyond the scope of
this document.
o This module does not cover any applications running on top of LDP
and mLDP, nor does it cover any OAM procedures for LDP and mLDP.
o This model is a VPN Forwarding and Routing (VRF)-centric model.
It is important to note that [RFC4364] defines VRF tables and
default forwarding tables as different, however from a yang
modelling perspective this introduces unnecessary complications,
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
hence we are treating the default forwarding table as just another
VRF.
o A "network-instance" as defined in [I-D.rtgyangdt-rtgwg-ni-model]
refers to a VRF instance (both default and non-default) within the
scope of this model.
o This model supports two address-families, namely "ipv4" and
"ipv6".
o This model assumes platform-wide label space (i.e. label space Id
of zero). However, when Upstream Label assignment [RFC6389] is in
use, an upstream assigned label is looked up in a Context-Specific
label space as defined in [RFC5331].
o The label and peer policies (including filters) are defined using
a prefix-list. When used for a peer policy, the prefix refers to
the LSR Id of the peer. The prefix-list is referenced from
routing-policy model as defined in [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-policy-model].
o The use of grouping (templates) for bundling and grouping the
configuration items is not employed in current revision, and is a
subject for consideration in future.
o This model uses the terms LDP "neighbor"/"adjacency", "session",
and "peer" with the following semantics:
* Neighbor/Adjacency: An LDP enabled LSR that is discovered
through LDP discovery mechanisms.
* Session: An LDP neighbor with whom a TCP connection has been
established.
* Peer: An LDP session which has successfully progressed beyond
its initialization phase and is either already exchanging the
bindings or is ready to do so.
It is to be noted that LDP Graceful Restart mechanisms defined in
[RFC3478] allow keeping the exchanged bindings for some time after
a session goes down with a peer. We call such a state -- i.e.
keeping peer bindings without established or recovered peering --
a "stale" peer. When used in this document, the above terms will
refer strictly to the semantics and definitions defined for them.
A graphical representation of LDP YANG data model is presented in
Figure 3, Figure 5, Figure 11, and Figure 12. Whereas, the actual
model definition in YANG is captured in Section 6.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
While presenting the YANG tree view and actual .yang specification,
this document assumes the reader is familiar with the concepts of
YANG modeling, its presentation and its compilation.
3.2. Configuration
This specification defines the configuration parameters for base LDP
as specified in [RFC5036] and LDP IPv6 [RFC7552]. Moreover, it
incorporates provisions to enable LDP Capabilities [RFC5561], and
defines some of the most significant and commonly used capabilities
such as Typed Wildcard FEC [RFC5918], End-of-LIB [RFC5919], and LDP
Upstream Label Assignment [RFC6389].
This specification supports VRF-centric configuration. For
implementations that support protocol-centric configuration, with
provision for inheritance and items that apply to all vrfs, we
recommend an augmentation of this model such that any protocol-
centric or all-vrf configuration is defined under their designated
containers within the standard network-instance (please see
Section 3.2.2)
This model augments /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols that is
defined in [I-D.ietf-netmod-routing-cfg]. For LDP interfaces, this
model refers the MPLS interface as defined under MPLS base
specification [I-D.saad-mpls-base-yang]. Furthermore, as mentioned
earlier, the configuration tree presents read-write intended
configuration leave/items as well as read-only state of the applied
configuration. The former is listed under "config" container and
latter under "state" container.
Following is high-level configuration organization for LDP/mLDP:
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
module: ietf-mpls-ldp
+-- routing
+-- control-plane-protocols
+-- mpls-ldp
+-- global
| +-- ...
| +-- ...
| +-- address-family* [afi]
| +-- . . .
| +-- . . .
| +-- discovery
| +-- . . .
+-- peers
+-- ...
+-- ...
Figure 2
Given the configuration hierarchy, the model allows inheritance such
that an item in a child tree is able to derive value from a similar
or related item in one of the parent. For instance, hello holdtime
can be configured per-VRF or per-VRF-interface, thus allowing
inheritance as well flexibility to override with a different value at
any child level.
Following is a simplified graphical representation of the data model
for LDP configuration
+--rw mpls-ldp!
+--rw global
| +--rw config
| | +--rw capability
| | | +--rw end-of-lib {capability-end-of-lib}?
| | | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | | +--rw typed-wildcard-fec {capability-typed-wildcard-fec}?
| | | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | | +--rw upstream-label-assignment {capability-upstream-label-assignment}?
| | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | +--rw graceful-restart
| | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | | +--rw helper-enable? boolean {graceful-restart-helper-mode}?
| | | +--rw reconnect-time? uint16
| | | +--rw recovery-time? uint16
| | | +--rw forwarding-holdtime? uint16
| | +--rw igp-synchronization-delay? uint16
| | +--rw lsr-id? yang:dotted-quad
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| +--rw address-family* [afi]
| | +--rw afi ldp-address-family
| | +--rw config
| | +--rw enable? boolean
| | +--rw label-policy
| | | +--rw independent-mode
| | | | +--rw assign {policy-label-assignment-config}?
| | | | | +--rw (prefix-option)?
| | | | | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | | | +--rw host-routes-only? boolean
| | | | +--rw advertise
| | | | | +--rw explicit-null
| | | | | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | | | | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | | +--rw accept
| | | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | +--rw ordered-mode {policy-ordered-label-config}?
| | | +--rw egress-lsr
| | | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | +--rw advertise
| | | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | +--rw accept
| | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | +--rw ipv4
| | | +--rw transport-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--rw ipv6
| | +--rw transport-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw discovery
| | +--rw interfaces
| | | +--rw config
| | | | +--rw hello-holdtime? uint16
| | | | +--rw hello-interval? uint16
| | | +--rw interface* [interface]
| | | +--rw interface mpls-interface-ref
| | | +--rw config
| | | | +--rw hello-holdtime? uint16
| | | | +--rw hello-interval? uint16
| | | | +--rw igp-synchronization-delay? uint16 {per-interface-timer-config}?
| | | +--rw address-family* [afi]
| | | +--rw afi ldp-address-family
| | | +--rw config
| | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | | +--rw ipv4
| | | | +--rw transport-address? union
| | | +--rw ipv6
| | | +--rw transport-address? union
| | +--rw targeted
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| | +--rw config
| | | +--rw hello-holdtime? uint16
| | | +--rw hello-interval? uint16
| | | +--rw hello-accept {policy-extended-discovery-config}?
| | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | | +--rw neighbor-list? neighbor-list-ref
| | +--rw address-family* [afi]
| | +--rw afi ldp-address-family
| | +--rw ipv4
| | | +--rw target* [adjacent-address]
| | | +--rw adjacent-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--rw config
| | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | | +--rw local-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--rw ipv6
| | +--rw target* [adjacent-address]
| | +--rw adjacent-address inet:ipv6-address
| | +--rw config
| | +--rw enable? boolean
| | +--rw local-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw forwarding-nexthop {forwarding-nexthop-config}?
| | +--rw interfaces
| | +--rw interface* [interface]
| | +--rw interface mpls-interface-ref
| | +--rw address-family* [afi]
| | +--rw afi ldp-address-family
| | +--rw config
| | +--rw ldp-disable? boolean
| +--rw label-policy
| +--rw independent-mode
| | +--rw assign {policy-label-assignment-config}?
| | | +--rw (prefix-option)?
| | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | +--rw host-routes-only? boolean
| | +--rw advertise
| | | +--rw explicit-null
| | | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | +--rw accept
| | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| +--rw ordered-mode {policy-ordered-label-config}?
| +--rw egress-lsr
| | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| +--rw advertise
| | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| +--rw accept
| +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
+--rw peers
+--rw config
| +--rw session-authentication-md5-password? string
| +--rw session-ka-holdtime? uint16
| +--rw session-ka-interval? uint16
| +--rw session-downstream-on-demand {session-downstream-on-demand-config}?
| +--rw enable? boolean
| +--rw peer-list? peer-list-ref
+--rw peer* [lsr-id]
+--rw lsr-id yang:dotted-quad
+--rw config
+--rw admin-down? boolean
+--rw capability
+--rw label-policy
| +--rw advertise
| | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| +--rw accept
| +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
+--rw session-authentication-md5-password? string
+--rw graceful-restart
| +--rw enable? boolean
| +--rw reconnect-time? uint16
| +--rw recovery-time? uint16
+--rw session-ka-holdtime? uint16
+--rw session-ka-interval? uint16
+--rw address-family
+--rw ipv4
| +--rw label-policy
| +--rw advertise
| | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| +--rw accept
| +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
+--rw ipv6
+--rw label-policy
+--rw advertise
| +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
+--rw accept
+--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
Figure 3
3.2.1. Configuration Hierarchy
The LDP configuration container is logically divided into following
high-level config areas:
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
Per-VRF parameters
o Global parameters
o Per-address-family parameters
o LDP Capabilities parameters
o Hello Discovery parameters
- interfaces
- Per-interface:
Global
Per-address-family
- targeted
- Per-target
o Peer parameters
- Global
- Per-peer
Per-address-family
Capabilities parameters
o Forwarding parameters
Figure 4
Following subsections briefly explain these configuration areas.
3.2.1.1. Per-VRF parameters
LDP module resides under an network-instance and the scope of any LDP
configuration defined under this tree is per network-instance (per-
VRF). This configuration is further divided into sub categories as
follows.
3.2.1.1.1. Per-VRF global parameters
There are configuration items that are available directly under a VRF
instance and do not fall under any other sub tree. Example of such a
parameter is LDP LSR id that is typically configured per VRF. To
keep legacy LDP features and applications working in an LDP IPv4
networks with this model, this document recommends an operator to
pick a routable IPv4 unicast address as an LSR Id.
3.2.1.1.2. Per-VRF Capabilities parameters
This container falls under global tree and holds the LDP capabilities
that are to be enabled for certain features. By default, an LDP
capability is disabled unless explicitly enabled. These capabilities
are typically used to negotiate with LDP peer(s) the support/non-
support related to a feature and its parameters. The scope of a
capability enabled under this container applies to all LDP peers in
the given VRF instance. There is also a peer level capability
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
container that is provided to override a capability that is enabled/
specified at VRF level.
3.2.1.1.3. Per-VRF Per-Address-Family parameters
Any LDP configuration parameter related to IP address family (AF)
whose scope is VRF wide is configured under this tree. The examples
of per-AF parameters include enabling LDP for an address family,
prefix-list based label policies, and LDP transport address.
3.2.1.1.4. Per-VRF Hello Discovery parameters
This container is used to hold LDP configuration related to Hello and
discovery process for both basic (link) and extended (targeted)
discovery.
The "interfaces" is a container to configure parameters related to
VRF interfaces. There are parameters that apply to all interfaces
(such as hello timers), as well as parameters that can be configured
per-interface. Hence, an interface list is defined under
"interfaces" container. The model defines parameters to configure
per-interface non AF related items, as well as per-interface per-AF
items. The example of former is interface hello timers, and example
of latter is enabling hellos for a given AF under an interface.
The "targeted" container under a VRF instance allows to configure LDP
targeted discovery related parameters. Within this container, the
"target" list provides a mean to configure multiple target addresses
to perform extended discovery to a specific destination target, as
well as to fine-tune the per-target parameters.
3.2.1.1.5. Per-VRF Peer parameters
This container is used to hold LDP configuration related to LDP
sessions and peers under a VRF instance. This container allows to
configure parameters that either apply on VRF's all peers or a subset
(peer-list) of VRF peers. The example of such parameters include
authentication password, session KA timers etc. Moreover, the model
also allows per-peer parameter tuning by specifying a "peer" list
under the "peers" container. A peer is uniquely identified using its
LSR Id and hence LSR Id is the key for peer list
Like per-interface parameters, some per-peer parameters are AF-
agnostic (i.e. either non AF related or apply to both IP address
families), and some that belong to an AF. The example of former is
per-peer session password configuration, whereas the example of
latter is prefix-list based label policies (inbound and outbound)
that apply to a given peer.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
3.2.1.1.6. Per-VRF Forwarding parameters
This container is used to hold configuration used to control LDP
forwarding behavior under a VRF instance. One example of a
configuration under this container is when a user wishes to enable
neighbor discovery on an interface but wishes to disable use of the
same interface as forwarding nexthop. This example configuration
makes sense only when there are more than one LDP enabled interfaces
towards the neighbor.
3.2.2. All-VRFs Configuration
[Ed note: TODO]
3.3. Operational State
Operational state of LDP can be queried and obtained from read-only
state containers that fall under the same tree (/rt:routing/
rt:control-plane-protocols/) as the configuration.
Please note this state tree refers both the configuration "applied"
state as well as the "derived" state related to the protocol. [Ed
note: This is where this model differs presently from
[I-D.openconfig-netmod-opstate] and subject to alignment in later
revisions]
Following is a simplified graphical representation of the data model
for LDP operational state.
module: ietf-mpls-ldp
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols:
+--rw mpls-ldp!
+--rw global
| +--ro state
| | +--ro capability
| | | +--ro end-of-lib {capability-end-of-lib}?
| | | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | | +--ro typed-wildcard-fec {capability-typed-wildcard-fec}?
| | | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | | +--ro upstream-label-assignment {capability-upstream-label-assignment}?
| | | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | +--ro graceful-restart
| | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | | +--ro helper-enable? boolean {graceful-restart-helper-mode}?
| | | +--ro reconnect-time? uint16
| | | +--ro recovery-time? uint16
| | | +--ro forwarding-holdtime? uint16
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| | +--ro igp-synchronization-delay? uint16
| | +--ro lsr-id? yang:dotted-quad
| +--rw address-family* [afi]
| | +--rw afi ldp-address-family
| | +--ro state
| | +--ro enable? boolean
| | +--ro label-policy
| | | +--ro independent-mode
| | | | +--ro assign {policy-label-assignment-config}?
| | | | | +--ro (prefix-option)?
| | | | | +--:(prefix-list)
| | | | | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | | | +--:(host-routes-only)
| | | | | +--ro host-routes-only? boolean
| | | | +--ro advertise
| | | | | +--ro explicit-null
| | | | | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | | | | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | | +--ro accept
| | | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | +--ro ordered-mode {policy-ordered-label-config}?
| | | +--ro egress-lsr
| | | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | +--ro advertise
| | | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | +--ro accept
| | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | +--ro ipv4
| | | +--ro transport-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--ro bindings
| | | +--ro address* [address]
| | | | +--ro address inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--ro advertisement-type? advertised-received
| | | | +--ro peer? leafref
| | | +--ro fec-label* [fec]
| | | +--ro fec inet:ipv4-prefix
| | | +--ro peer* [peer advertisement-type]
| | | +--ro peer leafref
| | | +--ro advertisement-type advertised-received
| | | +--ro label? mpls:mpls-label
| | | +--ro used-in-forwarding? boolean
| | +--ro ipv6
| | +--ro transport-address? inet:ipv6-address
| | +--ro binding
| | +--ro address* [address]
| | | +--ro address inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--ro advertisement-type? advertised-received
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| | | +--ro peer? leafref
| | +--ro fec-label* [fec]
| | +--ro fec inet:ipv6-prefix
| | +--ro peer* [peer advertisement-type]
| | +--ro peer leafref
| | +--ro advertisement-type advertised-received
| | +--ro label? mpls:mpls-label
| | +--ro used-in-forwarding? boolean
| +--rw discovery
| | +--rw interfaces
| | | +--ro state
| | | | +--ro hello-holdtime? uint16
| | | | +--ro hello-interval? uint16
| | | +--rw interface* [interface]
| | | +--ro state
| | | | +--ro hello-holdtime? uint16
| | | | +--ro hello-interval? uint16
| | | | +--ro igp-synchronization-delay? uint16 {per-interface-timer-config}?
| | | | +--ro next-hello? uint16
| | | +--rw address-family* [afi]
| | | +--rw afi ldp-address-family
| | | +--ro state
| | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | | +--ro ipv4
| | | | +--ro transport-address? union
| | | | +--ro hello-adjacencies* [adjacent-address]
| | | | +--ro adjacent-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--ro flag* identityref
| | | | +--ro hello-holdtime
| | | | | +--ro adjacent? uint16
| | | | | +--ro negotiated? uint16
| | | | | +--ro remaining? uint16
| | | | +--ro next-hello? uint16
| | | | +--ro statistics
| | | | | +--ro discontinuity-time yang:date-and-time
| | | | | +--ro hello-received? yang:counter64
| | | | | +--ro hello-dropped? yang:counter64
| | | | +--ro peer? leafref
| | | +--ro ipv6
| | | +--ro transport-address? union
| | | +--ro hello-adjacencies* [adjacent-address]
| | | +--ro adjacent-address inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--ro flag* identityref
| | | +--ro hello-holdtime
| | | | +--ro adjacent? uint16
| | | | +--ro negotiated? uint16
| | | | +--ro remaining? uint16
| | | +--ro next-hello? uint16
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| | | +--ro statistics
| | | | +--ro discontinuity-time yang:date-and-time
| | | | +--ro hello-received? yang:counter64
| | | | +--ro hello-dropped? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro peer? leafref
| | +--rw targeted
| | +--ro state
| | | +--ro hello-holdtime? uint16
| | | +--ro hello-interval? uint16
| | | +--ro hello-accept {policy-extended-discovery-config}?
| | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | | +--ro neighbor-list? neighbor-list-ref
| | +--rw address-family* [afi]
| | +--rw afi ldp-address-family
| | +--ro state
| | | +--ro ipv4
| | | | +--ro hello-adjacencies* [local-address adjacent-address]
| | | | +--ro local-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--ro adjacent-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--ro flag* identityref
| | | | +--ro hello-holdtime
| | | | | +--ro adjacent? uint16
| | | | | +--ro negotiated? uint16
| | | | | +--ro remaining? uint16
| | | | +--ro next-hello? uint16
| | | | +--ro statistics
| | | | | +--ro discontinuity-time yang:date-and-time
| | | | | +--ro hello-received? yang:counter64
| | | | | +--ro hello-dropped? yang:counter64
| | | | +--ro peer? leafref
| | | +--ro ipv6
| | | +--ro hello-adjacencies* [local-address adjacent-address]
| | | +--ro local-address inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--ro adjacent-address inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--ro flag* identityref
| | | +--ro hello-holdtime
| | | | +--ro adjacent? uint16
| | | | +--ro negotiated? uint16
| | | | +--ro remaining? uint16
| | | +--ro next-hello? uint16
| | | +--ro statistics
| | | | +--ro discontinuity-time yang:date-and-time
| | | | +--ro hello-received? yang:counter64
| | | | +--ro hello-dropped? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro peer? leafref
| | +--rw ipv4
| | | +--rw target* [adjacent-address]
| | | +--rw adjacent-address inet:ipv4-address
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| | | +--ro state
| | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | | +--ro local-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--rw ipv6
| | +--rw target* [adjacent-address]
| | +--rw adjacent-address inet:ipv6-address
| | +--ro state
| | +--ro enable? boolean
| | +--ro local-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw forwarding-nexthop {forwarding-nexthop-config}?
| | +--rw interfaces
| | +--rw interface* [interface]
| | +--rw interface mpls-interface-ref
| | +--rw address-family* [afi]
| | +--rw afi ldp-address-family
| | +--ro state
| | +--ro ldp-disable? boolean
+--rw peers
+--ro state
| +--ro session-authentication-md5-password? string
| +--ro session-ka-holdtime? uint16
| +--ro session-ka-interval? uint16
| +--ro session-downstream-on-demand {session-downstream-on-demand-config}?
| +--ro enable? boolean
| +--ro peer-list? peer-list-ref
+--rw peer* [lsr-id]
+--rw lsr-id yang:dotted-quad
+--ro state
+--ro admin-down? boolean
+--ro capability
+--ro label-policy
| +--ro advertise
| | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| +--ro accept
| +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
+--ro session-authentication-md5-password? string
+--ro graceful-restart
| +--ro enable? boolean
| +--ro reconnect-time? uint16
| +--ro recovery-time? uint16
+--ro session-ka-holdtime? uint16
+--ro session-ka-interval? uint16
+--ro address-family
| +--ro ipv4
| | +--ro label-policy
| | | +--ro advertise
| | | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | +--ro accept
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | +--ro hello-adjacencies* [local-address adjacent-address]
| | +--ro local-address inet:ipv4-address
| | +--ro adjacent-address inet:ipv4-address
| | +--ro flag* identityref
| | +--ro hello-holdtime
| | | +--ro adjacent? uint16
| | | +--ro negotiated? uint16
| | | +--ro remaining? uint16
| | +--ro next-hello? uint16
| | +--ro statistics
| | | +--ro discontinuity-time yang:date-and-time
| | | +--ro hello-received? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro hello-dropped? yang:counter64
| | +--ro interface? mpls-interface-ref
| +--ro ipv6
| +--ro label-policy
| | +--ro advertise
| | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | +--ro accept
| | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| +--ro hello-adjacencies* [local-address adjacent-address]
| +--ro local-address inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro adjacent-address inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro flag* identityref
| +--ro hello-holdtime
| | +--ro adjacent? uint16
| | +--ro negotiated? uint16
| | +--ro remaining? uint16
| +--ro next-hello? uint16
| +--ro statistics
| | +--ro discontinuity-time yang:date-and-time
| | +--ro hello-received? yang:counter64
| | +--ro hello-dropped? yang:counter64
| +--ro interface? mpls-interface-ref
+--ro label-advertisement-mode
| +--ro local? label-adv-mode
| +--ro peer? label-adv-mode
| +--ro negotiated? label-adv-mode
+--ro next-keep-alive? uint16
+--ro peer-ldp-id? yang:dotted-quad
+--ro received-peer-state
| +--ro graceful-restart
| | +--ro enable? boolean
| | +--ro reconnect-time? uint16
| | +--ro recovery-time? uint16
| +--ro capability
| +--ro end-of-lib
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| | +--ro enable? boolean
| +--ro typed-wildcard-fec
| | +--ro enable? boolean
| +--ro upstream-label-assignment
| +--ro enable? boolean
+--ro session-holdtime
| +--ro peer? uint16
| +--ro negotiated? uint16
| +--ro remaining? uint16
+--ro session-state? enumeration
+--ro tcp-connection
| +--ro local-address? inet:ip-address
| +--ro local-port? inet:port-number
| +--ro remote-address? inet:ip-address
| +--ro remote-port? inet:port-number
+--ro up-time? string
+--ro statistics
+--ro discontinuity-time yang:date-and-time
+--ro received
| +--ro total-octets? yang:counter64
| +--ro total-messages? yang:counter64
| +--ro address? yang:counter64
| +--ro address-withdraw? yang:counter64
| +--ro initialization? yang:counter64
| +--ro keepalive? yang:counter64
| +--ro label-abort-request? yang:counter64
| +--ro label-mapping? yang:counter64
| +--ro label-release? yang:counter64
| +--ro label-request? yang:counter64
| +--ro label-withdraw? yang:counter64
| +--ro notification? yang:counter64
+--ro sent
| +--ro total-octets? yang:counter64
| +--ro total-messages? yang:counter64
| +--ro address? yang:counter64
| +--ro address-withdraw? yang:counter64
| +--ro initialization? yang:counter64
| +--ro keepalive? yang:counter64
| +--ro label-abort-request? yang:counter64
| +--ro label-mapping? yang:counter64
| +--ro label-release? yang:counter64
| +--ro label-request? yang:counter64
| +--ro label-withdraw? yang:counter64
| +--ro notification? yang:counter64
+--ro total-addresses? uint32
+--ro total-labels? uint32
+--ro total-fec-label-bindings? uint32
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
Figure 5
3.3.1. Derived States
Following are main areas for which LDP operational "derived" state is
defined:
Neighbor Adjacencies
Peer
Bindings (FEC-label and address)
Capabilities
3.3.1.1. Adjacency state
Neighbor adjacencies are per address-family hello adjacencies that
are formed with neighbors as result of LDP basic or extended
discovery. In terms of organization, there is a source of discovery
(e.g. interface or target address) along with its associated
parameters and one or more discovered neighbors along with neighbor
discovery related parameters. For the basic discovery, there could
be more than one discovered neighbor for a given source (interface),
whereas there is at most one discovered neighbor for an extended
discovery source (local-address and target-address). This is also to
be noted that the reason for a targeted neighbor adjacency could be
either an active source (locally configured targeted) or passive
source (to allow any incoming extended/targeted hellos). A neighbor/
adjacency record also contains session-state that helps highlight
whether a given adjacency has progressed to subsequent session level
or to eventual peer level.
Following captures high level tree hierarchy for neighbor adjacency
state.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
+--rw mpls-ldp!
+--rw discovery
+--rw interfaces
| +--rw interface* [interface]
| +--rw address-family* [af]
| +--ro state
| +--ro ipv4 (or ipv6)
| +--ro hello-adjacencies* [adjacent-address]
| +--ro adjacent-address
| . . . .
| . . . .
+--rw targeted
+--rw address-family* [afi]
+--rw afi address-family
+--ro state
+--ro ipv4 (or ipv6)
+--ro hello-adjacencies* [local-address adjacent-address]
+--ro local-address
+--ro adjacent-address
. . . .
. . . .
Figure 6
3.3.1.2. Peer state
Peer related derived state is presented under peers tree. This is
one of the core state that provides info on the session related
parameters (mode, authentication, KA timeout etc.), TCP connection
info, hello adjacencies for the peer, statistics related to messages
and bindings, and capabilities exchange info.
Following captures high level tree hierarchy for peer state.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
+--rw mpls-ldp!
+--rw peers
+--rw peer* [lsr-id]
+--rw lsr-id
+--ro state
+--ro session-ka-holdtime?
+-- . . . .
+-- . . . .
+--ro capability
+ +ro -- . . .
+--ro address-family
| +--ro ipv4 (or ipv6)
| +--ro hello-adjacencies* [local-address adjacent-address]
| . . . .
| . . . .
+--ro received-peer-state
| +--ro . . . .
| +--ro capability
| +--ro . . . .
+--ro statistics
+-- . . . .
+-- . . . .
Figure 7
3.3.1.3. Bindings state
Binding state provides information on LDP FEC-label bindings as well
as address binding for both inbound (received) as well as outbound
(advertised) direction. FEC-label bindings are presented as a FEC-
centric view, and address bindings are presented as an address-
centric view:
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
FEC-Label bindings:
FEC 200.1.1.1/32:
advertised: local-label 16000
peer 192.168.0.2:0
peer 192.168.0.3:0
peer 192.168.0.4:0
received:
peer 192.168.0.2:0, label 16002, used-in-forwarding=Yes
peer 192.168.0.3:0, label 17002, used-in-forwarding=No
FEC 200.1.1.2/32:
. . . .
FEC 201.1.0.0/16:
. . . .
Address bindings:
Addr 1.1.1.1:
advertised
Addr 1.1.1.2:
advertised
Addr 2.2.2.2:
received, peer 192.168.0.2
Addr 2.2.2.22:
received, peer 192.168.0.2
Addr 3.3.3.3:
received, peer 192.168.0.3
Addr 3.3.3.33:
received, peer 192.168.0.3
Figure 8
Note that all local addresses are advertised to all peers and hence
no need to provide per-peer information for local address
advertisement. Furthermore, note that it is easy to derive a peer-
centric view for the bindings from the information already provided
in this model.
Following captures high level tree hierarchy for bindings state.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
+--rw mpls-ldp!
+--rw global
+--rw address-family* [afi]
+--rw afi address-family
+--ro state
+--ro ipv4 (or ipv6)
+--ro bindings
+--ro address* [address]
| +--ro address
| +--ro direction? advertised-received
| +--ro peer? leafref
+--ro fec-label* [fec]
+--ro fec inet:ipv4-prefix
+--ro peer* [peer advertisement-type]
+--ro peer leafref
+--ro advertisement-type advertised-received
+--ro label? mpls:mpls-label
+--ro used-in-forwarding? boolean
Figure 9
3.3.1.4. Capabilities state
LDP capabilities state comprise two types of information - global
information (such as timer etc.), and per-peer information.
Following captures high level tree hierarchy for LDP capabilities
state.
+--rw mpls-ldp!
+--rw global
| +--ro state
| +--ro capability
| +--ro . . . .
| +--ro . . . .
+--rw peers
+--rw peer* [lsr-id]
+--rw lsr-id yang:dotted-quad
+--ro state
+--ro received-peer-state
+--ro capability
+--ro . . . .
+--ro . . . .
Figure 10
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
3.4. Notifications
This model defines a list of notifications to inform client of
important events detected during the protocol operation. These
events include events related to changes in the operational state of
an LDP peer, hello adjacency, and FEC etc. It is to be noted that an
LDP FEC is treated as operational (up) as long as it has at least 1
NHLFE with outgoing label.
Following is a simplified graphical representation of the data model
for LDP notifications.
module: ietf-mpls-ldp
notifications:
+---n mpls-ldp-peer-event
| +--ro event-type? oper-status-event-type
| +--ro peer-ref? leafref
+---n mpls-ldp-hello-adjacency-event
| +--ro event-type? oper-status-event-type
| +--ro (hello-adjacency-type)?
| +--:(targeted)
| | +--ro targeted
| | +--ro target-address? inet:ip-address
| +--:(link)
| +--ro link
| +--ro next-hop-interface? mpls-interface-ref
| +--ro next-hop-address? inet:ip-address
+---n mpls-ldp-fec-event
+--ro event-type? oper-status-event-type
+--ro prefix? inet:ip-prefix
Figure 11
3.5. Actions
This model defines a list of rpcs that allow performing an action or
executing a command on the protocol. For example, it allows to clear
(reset) LDP peers, hello-adjacencies, and statistics. The model
makes an effort to provide different level of control so that a user
is able to either clear all, or clear all for a given type, or clear
a specific entity.
Following is a simplified graphical representation of the data model
for LDP actions.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
module: ietf-mpls-ldp
rpcs:
+---x mpls-ldp-clear-peer
| +---w input
| +---w lsr-id? union
+---x mpls-ldp-clear-hello-adjacency
| +---w input
| +---w hello-adjacency
| +---w (hello-adjacency-type)?
| +--:(targeted)
| | +---w targeted!
| | +---w target-address? inet:ip-address
| +--:(link)
| +---w link!
| +---w next-hop-interface? mpls-interface-ref
| +---w next-hop-address? inet:ip-address
+---x mpls-ldp-clear-peer-statistics
+---w input
+---w lsr-id? union
Figure 12
4. mLDP YANG Model
4.1. Overview
Due to tight dependency of mLDP on LDP, mLDP model builds on top of
LDP model defined earlier in the document. Following are the main
mLDP areas and documents that are within the scope of this model:
o mLDP Base Specification [RFC6388]
o mLDP Recursive FEC [RFC6512]
o Targeted mLDP [RFC7060]
o mLDP Fast-Reroute (FRR)
* Node Protection [RFC7715]
* Multicast-only
o Hub-and-Spoke Multipoint LSPs [RFC7140]
o mLDP In-band Signaling [RFC6826] (future revision)
o mLDP In-band signaling in a VRF [RFC7246]
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
o mLDP In-band Signaling with Wildcards [RFC7438] (future revision)
o Configured Leaf LSPs (manually provisioned)
[Ed Note: Some of the topics in the above list are to be addressed/
added in later revision of this document].
4.2. Configuration
4.2.1. Configuration Hierarchy
In terms of overall configuration layout, following figure highlights
extensions to LDP configuration model to incorporate mLDP:
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
+-- mpls-ldp
+-- ...
+-- ...
+-- mldp
| +-- ...
| +-- ...
| +-- address-family* [af]
| +-- af
| +-- ...
| +-- ...
+-- global
| +-- ...
| +-- capability
| +-- ...
| +-- ...
| +-- mldp
| +-- ...
| +-- ...
+-- discovery
| +-- ...
| +-- ...
+-- forwarding-nexthop
| +-- interfaces
| +-- interface* [interface]
| +-- interface
| +-- address-family* [af]
| +-- af
| +-- ...
| +-- mldp-disable
+-- peers
+-- ...
+-- ...
+-- peer* [lsr-id]
+-- ...
+-- ...
+-- capability
+-- ...
+-- ...
+-- mldp
+-- ...
+-- ...
Figure 13
From above hierarchy, we can categorize mLDP configuration parameters
into two types:
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
o Parameters that leverage/extend LDP containers and parameters
o Parameters that are mLDP specific
Following subsections first describe mLDP specific configuration
parameters, followed by those leveraging LDP.
4.2.2. mldp container
mldp container resides directly under "mpls-ldp" and holds the
configuration related to items that are mLDP specific. The main
items under this container are:
o mLDP enabling: To enable mLDP under a (VRF) routing instance, mldp
container is enabled under LDP. Given that mLDP requires LDP
signalling, it is not sensible to allow disabling LDP control
plane under a (VRF) network-instance while requiring mLDP to be
enabled for the same. However, if a user wishes only to allow
signalling for multipoint FECs on an LDP/mLDP enabled VRF
instance, he/she can use LDP label-policies to disable unicast
FECs under the VRF.
o mLDP per-AF features: mLDP manages its own list of IP address-
families and the features enabled underneath. The per-AF mLDP
configuration items include:
* Multicast-only FRR: This enables Multicast-only FRR
functionality for a given AF under mLDP. The feature allows
route-policy to be configured for finer control/applicability
of the feature.
* Recursive FEC: The recursive-fec feature [RFC6512] can be
enabled per AF with a route-policy.
* Configured Leaf LSPs: To provision multipoint leaf LSP
manually, a container is provided per-AF under LDP. The
configuration is flexible and allows a user to specify MP LSPs
of type p2mp or mp2mp with IPv4 or IPv6 root address(es) by
using either LSP-Id or (S,G).
Targeted mLDP feature specification [RFC7060] do not require any mLDP
specific configuration. It, however, requires LDP upstream-label-
assignment capability [RFC6389] to be enabled.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
4.2.3. Leveraging LDP containers
mLDP configuration model leverages following configuration areas and
containers that are already defined for LDP:
o Capabilities: A new container "mldp" is defined under Capabilities
container. This new container specifies any mLDP specific
capabilities and their parameters. Moreover, a new "mldp"
container is also added under per-peer capability container to
override/control mLDP specific capabilities on a peer level. In
the scope of this document, the most important capabilities
related to mLDP are p2mp, mp2mp, make-before-break, hub-and-spoke,
and node-protection.
o Discovery and Peer: mLDP requires LDP discovery and peer
procedures to form mLDP peering. A peer is treated as mLDP peer
only when either P2MP or MP2MP capabilities have been successfully
exchanged with the peer. If a user wish to selectively enable or
disable mLDP with a LDP-enabled peer, he/she may use per-peer mLDP
capabilities configuration. [Ed Note: The option to control mLDP
enabling/disabling on a peer-list is being explored for future ].
In most common deployments, it is desirable to disable mLDP
(capabilities announcements) on a targeted-only LDP peering, where
targeted-only peer is the one whose discovery sources are targeted
only. In future revision, a configuration option for this support
will also be provided.
o Forwarding: By default, mLDP is allowed to select any of the LDP
enabled interface as a downstream interface towards a nexthop
(LDP/mLDP peer) for MP LSP programming. However, a configuration
option is provided to allow mLDP to exclude a given interface from
such a selection. Note that such a configuration option will be
useful only when there are more than one interfaces available for
the downstream selection.
This goes without saying that mLDP configuration tree follows the
same approach as LDP, where the tree comprise leafs for intended
configuration.
4.2.4. YANG tree
The following figure captures the YANG tree for mLDP configuration.
To keep the focus, the figure has been simplified to display only
mLDP items without any LDP items.
module: ietf-mpls-ldp
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols:
+--rw mpls-ldp!
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
+--rw global
| +--rw config
| | +--rw capability
| | +--rw mldp {mldp}?
| | +--rw p2mp
| | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | +--rw mp2mp
| | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | +--rw make-before-break
| | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | | +--rw switchover-delay? uint16
| | | +--rw timeout? uint16
| | +--rw hub-and-spoke {capability-mldp-hsmp}?
| | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | +--rw node-protection {capability-mldp-node-protection}?
| | +--rw plr? boolean
| | +--rw merge-point
| | +--rw enable? boolean
| | +--rw targeted-session-teardown-delay? uint16
| +--rw mldp {mldp}?
| | +--rw config
| | | +--rw enable? boolean
| | +--rw address-family* [afi]
| | +--rw afi ldp-address-family
| | +--rw config
| | | +--rw multicast-only-frr {mldp-mofrr}?
| | | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | | +--rw recursive-fec
| | | +--rw prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | +--rw configured-leaf-lsps
| | +--rw p2mp
| | | +--rw roots-ipv4
| | | | +--rw root* [root-address]
| | | | +--rw root-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--rw lsp* [lsp-id source-address group-address]
| | | | +--rw lsp-id uint16
| | | | +--rw source-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--rw group-address inet:ipv4-address-no-zone
| | | +--rw roots-ipv6
| | | +--rw root* [root-address]
| | | +--rw root-address inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--rw lsp* [lsp-id source-address group-address]
| | | +--rw lsp-id uint16
| | | +--rw source-address inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--rw group-address inet:ipv6-address-no-zone
| | +--rw mp2mp
| | +--rw roots-ipv4
| | | +--rw root* [root-address]
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| | | +--rw root-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--rw lsp* [lsp-id source-address group-address]
| | | +--rw lsp-id uint16
| | | +--rw source-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--rw group-address inet:ipv4-address-no-zone
| | +--rw roots-ipv6
| | +--rw root* [root-address]
| | +--rw root-address inet:ipv6-address
| | +--rw lsp* [lsp-id source-address group-address]
| | +--rw lsp-id uint16
| | +--rw source-address inet:ipv6-address
| | +--rw group-address inet:ipv6-address-no-zone
| +--rw forwarding-nexthop {forwarding-nexthop-config}?
| +--rw interfaces
| +--rw interface* [interface]
| +--rw interface if:interface-ref
| +--rw address-family* [afi]
| +--rw afi address-family
| +--rw config
| +--rw mldp-disable? boolean {mldp}?
+--rw peers
+--rw peer* [lsr-id]
+--rw capability
+--rw mldp {mldp}?
+--rw p2mp
| +--rw enable? boolean
+--rw mp2mp
| +--rw enable? boolean
+--rw make-before-break
| +--rw enable? boolean
| +--rw switchover-delay? uint16
| +--rw timeout? uint16
+--rw hub-and-spoke {capability-mldp-hsmp}?
| +--rw enable? boolean
+--rw node-protection {capability-mldp-node-protection}?
+--rw plr? boolean
+--rw merge-point
+--rw enable? boolean
+--rw targeted-session-teardown-delay? uint16
Figure 14
4.3. Operational State
Operational state of mLDP can be queried and obtained from this read-
only container "mldp" which resides under mpls-ldp container.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
Please note this state tree refers both the configuration "applied"
state as well as the "derived" state related to the mLDP protocol.
Following is a simplified graphical representation of the data model
for mLDP operational state:
module: ietf-mpls-ldp
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols:
+--rw mpls-ldp!
+--rw global
| +--ro state
| | +--ro capability
| | +--ro mldp {mldp}?
| | +--ro p2mp
| | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | +--ro mp2mp
| | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | +--ro make-before-break
| | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | | +--ro switchover-delay? uint16
| | | +--ro timeout? uint16
| | +--ro hub-and-spoke {capability-mldp-hsmp}?
| | | +--ro enable? boolean
| | +--ro node-protection {capability-mldp-node-protection}?
| | +--ro plr? boolean
| | +--ro merge-point
| | +--ro enable? boolean
| | +--ro targeted-session-teardown-delay? uint16
| |
| +--rw mldp {mldp}?
| | +--ro state
| | +--ro enable? boolean
| | +--rw address-family* [afi]
| | +--rw afi ldp-address-family
| | +--ro state
| | +--ro multicast-only-frr {mldp-mofrr}?
| | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | +--ro recursive-fec
| | | +--ro prefix-list? prefix-list-ref
| | +--ro ipv4
| | | +--ro roots
| | | | +--ro root* [root-address]
| | | | +--ro root-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--ro is-self? boolean
| | | | +--ro reachability* [address interface]
| | | | +--ro address inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--ro interface mpls-interface-ref
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| | | | +--ro peer? leafref
| | | +--ro bindings
| | | +--ro opaque-type-lspid
| | | | +--ro fec-label* [root-address lsp-id recur-root-address recur-rd]
| | | | +--ro root-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--ro lsp-id uint32
| | | | +--ro recur-root-address inet:ip-address
| | | | +--ro recur-rd route-distinguisher
| | | | +--ro multipoint-type? multipoint-type
| | | | +--ro peer* [direction peer advertisement-type]
| | | | +--ro direction downstream-upstream
| | | | +--ro peer leafref
| | | | +--ro advertisement-type advertised-received
| | | | +--ro label? mpls:mpls-label
| | | | +--ro mbb-role? enumeration
| | | | +--ro mofrr-role? enumeration
| | | +--ro opaque-type-src
| | | | +--ro fec-label* [root-address source-address group-address rd recur-root-address recur-rd]
| | | | +--ro root-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--ro source-address inet:ip-address
| | | | +--ro group-address inet:ip-address-no-zone
| | | | +--ro rd route-distinguisher
| | | | +--ro recur-root-address inet:ip-address
| | | | +--ro recur-rd route-distinguisher
| | | | +--ro multipoint-type? multipoint-type
| | | | +--ro peer* [direction peer advertisement-type]
| | | | +--ro direction downstream-upstream
| | | | +--ro peer leafref
| | | | +--ro advertisement-type advertised-received
| | | | +--ro label? mpls:mpls-label
| | | | +--ro mbb-role? enumeration
| | | | +--ro mofrr-role? enumeration
| | | +--ro opaque-type-bidir
| | | +--ro fec-label* [root-address rp group-address rd recur-root-address recur-rd]
| | | +--ro root-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--ro rp inet:ip-address
| | | +--ro group-address inet:ip-address-no-zone
| | | +--ro rd route-distinguisher
| | | +--ro recur-root-address inet:ip-address
| | | +--ro recur-rd route-distinguisher
| | | +--ro multipoint-type? multipoint-type
| | | +--ro peer* [direction peer advertisement-type]
| | | +--ro direction downstream-upstream
| | | +--ro peer leafref
| | | +--ro advertisement-type advertised-received
| | | +--ro label? mpls:mpls-label
| | | +--ro mbb-role? enumeration
| | | +--ro mofrr-role? enumeration
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| | +--ro ipv6
| | +--ro roots
| | | +--ro root* [root-address]
| | | +--ro root-address inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--ro is-self? boolean
| | | +--ro reachability* [address interface]
| | | +--ro address inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--ro interface mpls-interface-ref
| | | +--ro peer? leafref
| | +--ro bindings
| | +--ro opaque-type-lspid
| | | +--ro fec-label* [root-address lsp-id recur-root-address recur-rd]
| | | +--ro root-address inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--ro lsp-id uint32
| | | +--ro recur-root-address inet:ip-address
| | | +--ro recur-rd route-distinguisher
| | | +--ro multipoint-type? multipoint-type
| | | +--ro peer* [direction peer advertisement-type]
| | | +--ro direction downstream-upstream
| | | +--ro peer leafref
| | | +--ro advertisement-type advertised-received
| | | +--ro label? mpls:mpls-label
| | | +--ro mbb-role? enumeration
| | | +--ro mofrr-role? enumeration
| | +--ro opaque-type-src
| | | +--ro fec-label* [root-address source-address group-address rd recur-root-address recur-rd]
| | | +--ro root-address inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--ro source-address inet:ip-address
| | | +--ro group-address inet:ip-address-no-zone
| | | +--ro rd route-distinguisher
| | | +--ro recur-root-address inet:ip-address
| | | +--ro recur-rd route-distinguisher
| | | +--ro multipoint-type? multipoint-type
| | | +--ro peer* [direction peer advertisement-type]
| | | +--ro direction downstream-upstream
| | | +--ro peer leafref
| | | +--ro advertisement-type advertised-received
| | | +--ro label? mpls:mpls-label
| | | +--ro mbb-role? enumeration
| | | +--ro mofrr-role? enumeration
| | +--ro opaque-type-bidir
| | +--ro fec-label* [root-address rp group-address rd recur-root-address recur-rd]
| | +--ro root-address inet:ipv6-address
| | +--ro rp inet:ip-address
| | +--ro group-address inet:ip-address-no-zone
| | +--ro rd route-distinguisher
| | +--ro recur-root-address inet:ip-address
| | +--ro recur-rd route-distinguisher
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
| | +--ro multipoint-type? multipoint-type
| | +--ro peer* [direction peer advertisement-type]
| | +--ro direction downstream-upstream
| | +--ro peer leafref
| | +--ro advertisement-type advertised-received
| | +--ro label? mpls:mpls-label
| | +--ro mbb-role? enumeration
| | +--ro mofrr-role? enumeration
| +--rw forwarding-nexthop {forwarding-nexthop-config}?
| +--rw interfaces
| +--rw interface* [interface]
| +--rw address-family* [afi]
| +--ro state
| +--ro mldp-disable? boolean {mldp}?
+--rw peers
+--rw peer* [lsr-id]
+--ro state
+--ro capability
| +--ro mldp {mldp}?
| +--ro p2mp
| | +--ro enable? boolean
| +--ro mp2mp
| | +--ro enable? boolean
| +--ro make-before-break
| | +--ro enable? boolean
| | +--ro switchover-delay? uint16
| | +--ro timeout? uint16
| +--ro hub-and-spoke {capability-mldp-hsmp}?
| | +--ro enable? boolean
| +--ro node-protection {capability-mldp-node-protection}?
| +--ro plr? boolean
| +--ro merge-point
| +--ro enable? boolean
| +--ro targeted-session-teardown-delay? uint16
+--ro received-peer-state
+--ro capability
+--ro mldp {mldp}?
+--ro p2mp
| +--ro enable? boolean
+--ro mp2mp
| +--ro enable? boolean
+--ro make-before-break
| +--ro enable? boolean
+--ro hub-and-spoke
| +--ro enable? boolean
+--ro node-protection
+--ro plr? boolean
+--ro merge-point? boolean
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
Figure 15
4.3.1. Derived states
Following are main areas for which mLDP operational derived state is
defined:
o Root
o Bindings (FEC-label)
o Capabilities
4.3.1.1. Root state
Root address is a fundamental construct for MP FEC bindings and LSPs.
The root state provides information on all the known roots in a given
address-familty, and their information on the root reachability (as
learnt from RIB). In case of multi-path reachability to a root, the
selection of upstream path is done on per-LSP basis at the time of
LSP setup. Similarly, when protection mechanisms like MBB or MoFRR
are in place, the path designation as active/standby or primary/
backup is also done on per LSP basis. It is to be noted that a given
root can be shared amongst multiple P2MP and/or MP2MP LSPs.
Moreover, an LSP can be signaled to more than one root for RNR
purposes.
The following diagram illustrates a root database on a branch/transit
LSR:
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
root 1.1.1.1:
path1:
RIB: GigEthernet 1/0, 12.1.0.2;
LDP: peer 192.168.0.1:0
path2:
RIB: GigEthernet 2/0, 12.2.0.2;
LDP: peer 192.168.0.3:0
root 2.2.2.2:
path1:
RIB: 3.3.3.3; (NOTE: This is a recursive path)
LDP: peer 192.168.0.3:0 (NOTE: T-mLDP peer)
root 9.9.9.9:
. . . .
Figure 16
A root entry on a root LSR itself will be presented as follows:
root 9.9.9.9:
is-self
Figure 17
4.3.1.2. Bindings state
Binding state provides information on mLDP FEC-label bindings for
both P2MP and MP2MP FEC types. Like LDP, the FEC-label binding
derived state is presented in a FEC-centric view per address-family,
and provides information on both inbound (received) and outbound
(advertised) bindings. The FEC is presented as (root-address,
opaque-type-data) and the direction (upstream or downstream) is
picked with respect to root reachability. In case of MBB or/and
MoFRR, the role of a given peer binding is also provided with respect
to MBB (active or standby) or/and MoFRR (primary or backup).
This document covers following type of opaque values with their keys
in the operational model of mLDP bindings:
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
+-------------------------+--------------------+------------+
| Opaque Type | Key | RFC |
+-------------------------+--------------------+------------+
| Generic LSP Identifier | LSP Id | [RFC6388] |
| Transit IPv4 Source | Source, Group | [RFC6826] |
| Transit IPv6 Source | Source, Group | [RFC6826] |
| Transit IPv4 Bidir | RP, Group | [RFC6826] |
| Transit IPv6 Bidir | RP, Group | [RFC6826] |
| Transit VPNv4 Source | Source, Group, RD | [RFC7246] |
| Transit VPNv6 Source | Source, Group, RD | [RFC7246] |
| Transit VPNv4 Bidir | RP, Group, RD | [RFC7246] |
| Transit VPNv6 Bidir | RP, Group, RD | [RFC7246] |
| Recursive Opaque | Root | [RFC6512] |
| VPN-Recursive Opaque | Root, RD | [RFC6512] |
+-------------------------+--------------------+------------+
Table 1: MP Opaque Types and keys
It is to be noted that there are three basic types (LSP Id, Source,
and Bidir) and then there are variants (VPN, recursive, VPN-
recursive) on top of these basic types.
Following captures high level tree hierarchy for mLDP bindings state:
+--rw mpls-ldp!
+--rw mldp
+--rw address-family* [afi]
+--rw afi address-family
+--ro state
+--ro ipv4 (or ipv6)
+--ro bindings
+--ro opaque-type-xxx [root-address, type-specific-key]
+--ro root-address
+--ro ...
+--ro recur-root-address inet:ipv4-address
+--ro recur-rd route-distinguisher
+--ro multipoint-type? multipoint-type
+--ro peer* [direction peer advertisement-type]
+--ro direction downstream-upstream
+--ro peer leafref
+--ro advertisement-type advertised-received
+--ro label? mpls:mpls-label
+--ro mbb-role? enumeration
+--ro mofrr-role? enumeration
Figure 18
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
In the above tree, the type-specific-key varies with the base type as
listed in earlier Table 1. For example, if the opaque type is
Generic LSP Identifier, then the type-specific-key will be a uint32
value corresponding to the LSP. Please see the complete model for
all other types.
Moreover, the binding tree defines only three types of sub-trees
(i.e. lspid, src, and bidir) which is able to map the respective
variants (vpn, recursive, and vpn-recusrive) accordingly. For
example, the key for opaque-type-src is [R, S, G, rd, recur-R, recur-
RD], where basic type will specify (R, S,G,-, -, -), VPN type will
specify (R, S,G, rd, -, -), recursive type will specify [R, S,G, -,
recur-R, -] and VPN-recursive type will specify [R, S,G, -, recur-R,
recur-rd].
It is important to take note of the following:
o The address-family ipv4/ipv4 applies to "root" address in the mLDP
binding tree. The other addresses (source, group, RP etc) do not
have to be of the same address family type as the root.
o The "recur-root-address" field applies to Recursive opaque type,
and (recur-root-address, recur-rd) fields applies to VPN-Recursive
opaque types as defined in [RFC6512]
o In case of a recursive FEC, the address-family of the recur-root-
address could be different than the address-family of the root
address of original encapsulated MP FEC
The following diagram illustrates the FEC-label binding information
structure for a P2MP (Transit IPv4 Source type) LSP on a branch/
transit LSR:
FEC (root 2.2.2.2, S=192.168.1.1, G=224.1.1.1):
type: p2mp
upstream:
advertised:
peer 192.168.0.1:0, label 16000 (local)
downstream:
received:
peer 192.168.0.2:0, label 17000 (remote)
peer 192.168.0.3:0, label 18000 (remote)
Figure 19
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
The following diagram illustrates the FEC-label binding information
structure for a similar MP2MP LSP on a branch/transit LSR:
FEC (root 2.2.2.2, RP=192.168.9.9, G=224.1.1.1):
type: mp2mp
upstream:
advertised:
peer 192.168.0.1:0, label 16000 (local)
received:
peer 192.168.0.1:0, label 17000 (remote)
downstream:
advertised:
peer 192.168.0.2:0, label 16001 (local), MBB role=active
peer 192.168.0.3:0, label 16002 (local), MBB role=standby
received:
peer 192.168.0.2:0, label 17001 (remote)
peer 192.168.0.3:0, label 18001 (remote)
Figure 20
4.3.1.3. Capabilities state
Like LDP, mLDP capabilities state comprise two types of information -
global information and per-peer information.
4.4. Notifications
mLDP notification module consists of notification related to changes
in the operational state of an mLDP FEC. Following is a simplified
graphical representation of the data model for mLDP notifications:
notifications:
+---n mpls-mldp-fec-event
+--ro event-type? oper-status-event-type
+--ro tree-type? multipoint-type
+--ro root? inet:ip-address
+--ro (lsp-key-type)?
+--:(lsp-id-based)
| +--ro lsp-id? uint16
+--:(source-group-based)
+--ro source-address? inet:ip-address
+--ro group-address? inet:ip-address
Figure 21
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
4.5. Actions
Currently, no RPCs/actions are defined for mLDP.
5. Open Items
Following is a list of open items that are to be discussed and
addressed in future revisions of this document:
o Close on augmentation off "mpls" list in "ietf-mpls" defined in
[I-D.saad-mpls-base-yang]
o Align operational state modeling with other routing procols and
[I-D.openconfig-netmod-opstate]
o Complete the section on Protocol-centric implementations and all-
vrfs
o Specify default values for configuration parameters
o Revisit and cut down on the scope of the document and number of
features it is trying to cover
o Split the model into a base and extended items
o Add statistics for mLDP root LSPs and bindings
o Extend the "Configured Leaf LSPs" for various type of opaque-types
o Extend mLDP notifications for other types of opaque values as well
o Close on single vs separate document for mLDP Yang
6. YANG Specification
Following are actual YANG definition for LDP and mLDP constructs
defined earlier in the document.
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-mpls-ldp@2016-07-08.yang" -->
module ietf-mpls-ldp {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-mpls-ldp";
// replace with IANA namespace when assigned
prefix ldp;
import ietf-inet-types {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix "yang";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
import ietf-ip {
prefix "ip";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
import ietf-mpls {
prefix "mpls";
}
organization
"IETF MPLS Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/>
WG List: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
WG Chair: Loa Andersson
<mailto:loa@pi.nu>
WG Chair: Ross Callon
<mailto:rcallon@juniper.net>
WG Chair: George Swallow
<mailto:swallow.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Kamran Raza
<mailto:skraza@cisco.com>
Editor: Rajiv Asati
<mailto:rajiva@cisco.com>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto:xliu@kuatrotech.com>
Editor: Santosh Esale
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
<mailto:sesale@juniper.net>
Editor: Xia Chen
<mailto:jescia.chenxia@huawei.com>
Editor: Himanshu Shah
<mailto:hshah@ciena.com>";
description
"This YANG module defines the essential components for the
management of Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label
Distribution Protocol (LDP) and Multipoint LDP (mLDP).";
revision 2016-07-08 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: YANG Data Model for MPLS LDP and mLDP.";
}
/*
* Features
*/
feature admin-down-config {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
administrative down on a VRF instance and a peer.";
}
feature all-af-policy-config {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
policies that are applied to all address families.";
}
feature capability-end-of-lib {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
LDP end-of-lib capability.";
}
feature capability-mldp-hsmp {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
mLDP hub-and-spoke-multipoint capability.";
}
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
feature capability-mldp-node-protection {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
mLDP node-protection capability.";
}
feature capability-typed-wildcard-fec {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
LDP typed-wildcard-fec capability.";
}
feature capability-upstream-label-assignment {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
LDP upstream label assignment capability.";
}
feature forwarding-nexthop-config {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
forwarding nexthop on interfaces.";
}
feature global-session-authentication {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
authentication at global level.";
}
feature graceful-restart-helper-mode {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports graceful
restart helper mode.";
}
feature mldp {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports Multicast
LDP (mLDP).";
}
feature mldp-mofrr {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports mLDP
Multicast only FRR (MoFRR).";
}
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
feature per-interface-timer-config {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
interface hello timers at the per-interface level.";
}
feature per-peer-graceful-restart-config {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
graceful restart at the per-peer level.";
}
feature per-peer-session-attributes-config {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
session attributes at the per-peer level.";
}
feature policy-extended-discovery-config {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
policies to control the acceptance of extended neighbor
discovery hello messages.";
}
feature policy-label-assignment-config {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
policies to assign labels according to certain prefixes.";
}
feature policy-ordered-label-config {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
ordered label policies.";
}
feature session-downstream-on-demand-config {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows to configure
session downstream-on-demand";
}
/*
* Typedefs
*/
typedef ldp-address-family {
type identityref {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
base rt:address-family;
}
description
"LDP address family type.";
}
typedef duration32-inf {
type union {
type uint32;
type enumeration {
enum "infinite" {
description "The duration is infinite.";
}
}
}
units seconds;
description
"Duration represented as 32 bit seconds with infinite.";
}
typedef advertised-received {
type enumeration {
enum advertised {
description "Advertised information.";
}
enum received {
description "Received information.";
}
}
description
"Received or advertised.";
}
typedef downstream-upstream {
type enumeration {
enum downstream {
description "Downstream information.";
}
enum upstream {
description "Upstream information.";
}
}
description
"Received or advertised.";
}
typedef label-adv-mode {
type enumeration {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
enum downstream-unsolicited {
description "Downstream Unsolicited.";
}
enum downstream-on-demand {
description "Downstream on Demand.";
}
}
description
"Label Advertisement Mode.";
}
typedef mpls-interface-ref {
type leafref {
path "/rt:routing/mpls:mpls/mpls:interface/mpls:name";
}
description
"This type is used by data models that need to reference
mpls interfaces.";
}
typedef multipoint-type {
type enumeration {
enum p2mp {
description "Point to multipoint.";
}
enum mp2mp {
description "Multipoint to multipoint.";
}
}
description
"p2mp or mp2mp.";
}
typedef neighbor-list-ref {
type string;
description
"A type for a reference to a neighbor list.";
}
typedef peer-list-ref {
type string;
description
"A type for a reference to a peer list.";
}
typedef prefix-list-ref {
type string;
description
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
"A type for a reference to a prefix list.";
}
typedef oper-status-event-type {
type enumeration {
enum up {
value 1;
description
"Operational status changed to up.";
}
enum down {
value 2;
description
"Operational status changed to down.";
}
}
description "Operational status event type for notifications.";
}
typedef route-distinguisher {
type string {
}
description
"Type definition for route distinguisher.";
reference
"RFC4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs).";
}
/*
* Identities
*/
identity adjacency-flag-base {
description "Base type for adjacency flags.";
}
identity adjacency-flag-active {
base "adjacency-flag-base";
description
"This adjacency is configured and actively created.";
}
identity adjacency-flag-passive {
base "adjacency-flag-base";
description
"This adjacency is not configured and passively accepted.";
}
/*
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
* Groupings
*/
grouping adjacency-state-attributes {
description
"Adjacency state attributes.";
leaf-list flag {
type identityref {
base "adjacency-flag-base";
}
description "Adjacency flags.";
}
container hello-holdtime {
description "Hello holdtime state.";
leaf adjacent {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description "Peer holdtime.";
}
leaf negotiated {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description "Negotiated holdtime.";
}
leaf remaining {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description "Remaining holdtime.";
}
}
leaf next-hello {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description "Time to send the next hello message.";
}
container statistics {
description
"Statistics objects.";
leaf discontinuity-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
mandatory true;
description
"The time on the most recent occasion at which any one or
more of this interface's counters suffered a
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
discontinuity. If no such discontinuities have occurred
since the last re-initialization of the local management
subsystem, then this node contains the time the local
management subsystem re-initialized itself.";
}
leaf hello-received {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of hello messages received.";
}
leaf hello-dropped {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of hello messages received.";
}
} // statistics
} // adjacency-state-attributes
grouping basic-discovery-timers {
description
"Basic discovery timer attributes.";
leaf hello-holdtime {
type uint16 {
range 15..3600;
}
units seconds;
description
"The time interval for which a LDP link Hello adjacency
is maintained in the absence of link Hello messages from
the LDP neighbor";
}
leaf hello-interval {
type uint16 {
range 5..1200;
}
units seconds;
description
"The interval between consecutive LDP link Hello messages
used in basic LDP discovery";
}
} // basic-discovery-timers
grouping binding-address-state-attributes {
description
"Address binding attributes";
leaf advertisement-type {
type advertised-received;
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"Received or advertised.";
}
leaf peer {
type leafref {
path "../../../../../../../peers/peer/lsr-id";
}
must "../advertisement-type = 'received'" {
description
"Applicable for received address.";
}
description
"LDP peer from which this address is received.";
} // peer
} // binding-address-state-attributes
grouping binding-label-state-attributes {
description
"Label binding attributes";
list peer {
key "peer advertisement-type";
description
"List of advertised and received peers.";
leaf peer {
type leafref {
path "../../../../../../../../peers/peer/lsr-id";
}
description
"LDP peer from which this binding is received,
or to which this binding is advertised.";
}
leaf advertisement-type {
type advertised-received;
description
"Received or advertised.";
}
leaf label {
type mpls:mpls-label;
description
"Advertised (outbound) or received (inbound)
label.";
}
leaf used-in-forwarding {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if the lable is used in forwarding.";
}
} // peer
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
} // binding-label-state-attributes
grouping extended-discovery-policy-attributes {
description
"LDP policy to control the acceptance of extended neighbor
discovery hello messages.";
container hello-accept {
if-feature policy-extended-discovery-config;
description
"Extended discovery acceptance policies.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"'true' to accept; 'false' to deny.";
}
leaf neighbor-list {
type neighbor-list-ref;
description
"The name of a peer ACL.";
}
} // hello-accept
} // extended-discovery-policy-attributes
grouping extended-discovery-timers {
description
"Extended discovery timer attributes.";
leaf hello-holdtime {
type uint16 {
range 15..3600;
}
units seconds;
description
"The time interval for which LDP targeted Hello adjacency
is maintained in the absence of targeted Hello messages
from an LDP neighbor.";
}
leaf hello-interval {
type uint16 {
range 5..3600;
}
units seconds;
description
"The interval between consecutive LDP targeted Hello
messages used in extended LDP discovery.";
}
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
} // extended-discovery-timers
grouping global-attributes {
description "Configuration attributes at global level.";
uses instance-attributes;
} // global-attributes
grouping graceful-restart-attributes {
description
"Graceful restart configuration attributes.";
container graceful-restart {
description
"Attributes for graceful restart.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable or disable graceful restart.";
}
leaf helper-enable {
if-feature graceful-restart-helper-mode;
type boolean;
description
"Enable or disable graceful restart helper mode.";
}
leaf reconnect-time {
type uint16 {
range 10..1800;
}
units seconds;
description
"Specifies the time interval that the remote LDP peer
must wait for the local LDP peer to reconnect after the
remote peer detects the LDP communication failure.";
}
leaf recovery-time {
type uint16 {
range 30..3600;
}
units seconds;
description
"Specifies the time interval, in seconds, that the remote
LDP peer preserves its MPLS forwarding state after
receiving the Initialization message from the restarted
local LDP peer.";
}
leaf forwarding-holdtime {
type uint16 {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
range 30..3600;
}
units seconds;
description
"Specifies the time interval, in seconds, before the
termination of the recovery phase.";
}
} // graceful-restart
} // graceful-restart-attributes
grouping graceful-restart-attributes-per-peer {
description
"Per peer graceful restart configuration attributes.";
container graceful-restart {
description
"Attributes for graceful restart.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable or disable graceful restart.";
}
leaf reconnect-time {
type uint16 {
range 10..1800;
}
units seconds;
description
"Specifies the time interval that the remote LDP peer
must wait for the local LDP peer to reconnect after the
remote peer detects the LDP communication failure.";
}
leaf recovery-time {
type uint16 {
range 30..3600;
}
units seconds;
description
"Specifies the time interval, in seconds, that the remote
LDP peer preserves its MPLS forwarding state after
receiving the Initialization message from the restarted
local LDP peer.";
}
} // graceful-restart
} // graceful-restart-attributes-per-peer
grouping instance-attributes {
description "Configuration attributes at instance level.";
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
container capability {
description "Configure capability.";
container end-of-lib {
if-feature capability-end-of-lib;
description
"Configure end-of-lib capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable end-of-lib capability.";
}
}
container typed-wildcard-fec {
if-feature capability-typed-wildcard-fec;
description
"Configure typed-wildcard-fec capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable typed-wildcard-fec capability.";
}
}
container upstream-label-assignment {
if-feature capability-upstream-label-assignment;
description
"Configure upstream label assignment capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable upstream label assignment.";
}
}
container mldp {
if-feature mldp;
description
"Multipoint capabilities.";
uses mldp-capabilities;
}
} // capability
uses graceful-restart-attributes;
leaf igp-synchronization-delay {
type uint16 {
range 3..60;
}
units seconds;
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 57]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"Sets the interval that the LDP waits before notifying the
Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) that label exchange is
completed so that IGP can start advertising the normal
metric for the link.";
}
leaf lsr-id {
type yang:dotted-quad;
description "Router ID.";
}
} // instance-attributes
grouping ldp-adjacency-ref {
description
"An absolute reference to an LDP adjacency.";
choice hello-adjacency-type {
description
"Interface or targeted adjacency.";
case targeted {
container targeted {
description "Targeted adjacency.";
leaf target-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"The target address.";
}
} // targeted
}
case link {
container link {
description "Link adjacency.";
leaf next-hop-interface {
type mpls-interface-ref;
description
"Interface connecting to next-hop.";
}
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ip-address;
must "../next-hop-interface" {
description
"Applicable when interface is specified.";
}
description
"IP address of next-hop.";
}
} // link
}
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 58]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
}
} // ldp-adjacency-ref
grouping ldp-fec-event {
description
"A LDP FEC event.";
leaf prefix {
type inet:ip-prefix;
description
"FEC.";
}
} // ldp-fec-event
grouping ldp-peer-ref {
description
"An absolute reference to an LDP peer.";
leaf peer-ref {
type leafref {
path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/mpls-ldp/"
+ "peers/peer/lsr-id";
}
description
"Reference to an LDP peer.";
}
} // ldp-peer-ref
grouping mldp-capabilities {
description
"mLDP capabilities.";
container p2mp {
description
"Configure point-to-multipoint capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable point-to-multipoint.";
}
}
container mp2mp {
description
"Configure multipoint-to-multipoint capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable multipoint-to-multipoint.";
}
}
container make-before-break {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 59]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"Configure make-before-break capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable make-before-break.";
}
leaf switchover-delay {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description
"Switchover delay in seconds.";
}
leaf timeout {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description
"Timeout in seconds.";
}
}
container hub-and-spoke {
if-feature capability-mldp-hsmp;
description
"Configure hub-and-spoke-multipoint capability.";
reference
"RFC7140: LDP Extensions for Hub and Spoke Multipoint
Label Switched Path";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable hub-and-spoke-multipoint.";
}
}
container node-protection {
if-feature capability-mldp-node-protection;
description
"Configure node-protection capability.";
reference
"RFC7715: mLDP Node Protection.";
leaf plr {
type boolean;
description
"Point of Local Repair capable for MP LSP node
protection.";
}
container merge-point {
description
"Merge Point capable for MP LSP node protection.";
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 60]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable merge point capability.";
}
leaf targeted-session-teardown-delay {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description
"Targeted session teardown delay.";
}
} // merge-point
}
} // mldp-capabilities
grouping mldp-configured-lsp-roots {
description
"mLDP roots containers.";
container roots-ipv4 {
when "../../../af = 'ipv4'" {
description
"Only for IPv4.";
}
description
"Configured IPv4 multicast LSPs.";
list root {
key "root-address";
description
"List of roots for configured multicast LSPs.";
leaf root-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Root address.";
}
list lsp {
must "(lsp-id = 0 and source-address != '0.0.0.0' and "
+ "group-address != '0.0.0.0') or "
+ "(lsp-id != 0 and source-address = '0.0.0.0' and "
+ "group-address = '0.0.0.0')" {
description
"A LSP can be identified by either <lsp-id> or
<source-address, group-address>.";
}
key "lsp-id source-address group-address";
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 61]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"List of LSPs.";
leaf lsp-id {
type uint16;
description "ID to identify the LSP.";
}
leaf source-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Source address.";
}
leaf group-address {
type inet:ipv4-address-no-zone;
description
"Group address.";
}
} // list lsp
} // list root
} // roots-ipv4
container roots-ipv6 {
when "../../../af = 'ipv6'" {
description
"Only for IPv6.";
}
description
"Configured IPv6 multicast LSPs.";
list root {
key "root-address";
description
"List of roots for configured multicast LSPs.";
leaf root-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Root address.";
}
list lsp {
must "(lsp-id = 0 and source-address != '::' and "
+ "group-address != '::') or "
+ "(lsp-id != 0 and source-address = '::' and "
+ "group-address = '::')" {
description
"A LSP can be identified by either <lsp-id> or
<source-address, group-address>.";
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 62]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
}
key "lsp-id source-address group-address";
description
"List of LSPs.";
leaf lsp-id {
type uint16;
description "ID to identify the LSP.";
}
leaf source-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Source address.";
}
leaf group-address {
type inet:ipv6-address-no-zone;
description
"Group address.";
}
} // list lsp
} // list root
} // roots-ipv6
} // mldp-configured-lsp-roots
grouping mldp-fec-event {
description
"A mLDP FEC event.";
leaf tree-type {
type multipoint-type;
description
"p2mp or mp2mp.";
}
leaf root {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Root address.";
}
choice lsp-key-type {
description
"LSP ID based or source-group based .";
case lsp-id-based {
leaf lsp-id {
type uint16;
description
"ID to identify the LSP.";
}
}
case source-group-based {
leaf source-address {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 63]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
type inet:ip-address;
description
"LSP source address.";
}
leaf group-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Multicast group address.";
}
} // case source-group-based
}
} // mldp-fec-event
grouping mldp-binding-label-state-attributes {
description
"mLDP label binding attributes.";
leaf multipoint-type {
type multipoint-type;
description
"The type of mutipoint, p2mp or mp2mp.";
}
list peer {
key "direction peer advertisement-type";
description
"List of advertised and received peers.";
leaf direction {
type downstream-upstream;
description
"Downstream or upstream.";
}
leaf peer {
type leafref {
path
"../../../../../../../../../../peers/peer/lsr-id";
}
description
"LDP peer from which this binding is received,
or to which this binding is advertised.";
}
leaf advertisement-type {
type advertised-received;
description
"Advertised or received.";
}
leaf label {
type mpls:mpls-label;
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 64]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"Advertised (outbound) or received (inbound) label.";
}
leaf mbb-role {
when "../direction = 'upstream'" {
description
"For upstream.";
}
type enumeration {
enum none {
description "MBB is not enabled.";
}
enum active {
description "This LSP is active.";
}
enum inactive {
description "This LSP is inactive.";
}
}
description
"The MBB status of this LSP.";
}
leaf mofrr-role {
when "../direction = 'upstream'" {
description
"For upstream.";
}
type enumeration {
enum none {
description "MOFRR is not enabled.";
}
enum primary {
description "This LSP is primary.";
}
enum backup {
description "This LSP is backup.";
}
}
description
"The MOFRR status of this LSP.";
}
} // peer
} // mldp-binding-label-state-attributes
grouping peer-af-policy-container {
description
"LDP policy attribute container under peer address-family.";
container label-policy {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 65]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"Label policy attributes.";
container advertise {
description
"Label advertising policies.";
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Applies the prefix list to outgoing label
advertisements.";
}
}
container accept {
description
"Label advertisement acceptance policies.";
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Applies the prefix list to incoming label
advertisements.";
}
} // accept
} // label-policy
} // peer-af-policy-container
grouping peer-attributes {
description "Peer configuration attributes.";
leaf session-ka-holdtime {
type uint16 {
range 45..3600;
}
units seconds;
description
"The time interval after which an inactive LDP session
terminates and the corresponding TCP session closes.
Inactivity is defined as not receiving LDP packets from the
peer.";
}
leaf session-ka-interval {
type uint16 {
range 15..1200;
}
units seconds;
description
"The interval between successive transmissions of keepalive
packets. Keepalive packets are only sent in the absence of
other LDP packets transmitted over the LDP session.";
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 66]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
}
} // peer-attributes
grouping peer-authentication {
description
"Peer authentication attributes.";
leaf session-authentication-md5-password {
type string {
length "1..80";
}
description
"Assigns an encrypted MD5 password to an LDP
peer";
} // md5-password
} // peer-authentication
grouping peer-state-derived {
description "Peer derived state attributes.";
container label-advertisement-mode {
description "Label advertisement mode state.";
leaf local {
type label-adv-mode;
description
"Local Label Advertisement Mode.";
}
leaf peer {
type label-adv-mode;
description
"Peer Label Advertisement Mode.";
}
leaf negotiated {
type label-adv-mode;
description
"Negotiated Label Advertisement Mode.";
}
}
leaf next-keep-alive {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description "Time to send the next KeepAlive message.";
}
leaf peer-ldp-id {
type yang:dotted-quad;
description "Peer LDP ID.";
}
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 67]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
container received-peer-state {
description "Peer features.";
uses graceful-restart-attributes-per-peer;
container capability {
description "Configure capability.";
container end-of-lib {
description
"Configure end-of-lib capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable end-of-lib capability.";
}
}
container typed-wildcard-fec {
description
"Configure typed-wildcard-fec capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable typed-wildcard-fec capability.";
}
}
container upstream-label-assignment {
description
"Configure upstream label assignment capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable upstream label assignment.";
}
}
container mldp {
if-feature mldp;
description
"Multipoint capabilities.";
container p2mp {
description
"Configure point-to-multipoint capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable point-to-multipoint.";
}
}
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 68]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
container mp2mp {
description
"Configure multipoint-to-multipoint capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable multipoint-to-multipoint.";
}
}
container make-before-break {
description
"Configure make-before-break capability.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable make-before-break.";
}
}
container hub-and-spoke {
description
"Configure hub-and-spoke-multipoint capability.";
reference
"RFC7140: LDP Extensions for Hub and Spoke Multipoint
Label Switched Path";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable hub-and-spoke-multipoint.";
}
}
container node-protection {
description
"Configure node-protection capability.";
reference
"RFC7715: mLDP Node Protection.";
leaf plr {
type boolean;
description
"Point of Local Repair capable for MP LSP node
protection.";
}
leaf merge-point {
type boolean;
description
"Merge Point capable for MP LSP node protection.";
} // merge-point
} // node-protection
} // mldp
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 69]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
} // capability
} // received-peer-state
container session-holdtime {
description "Session holdtime state.";
leaf peer {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description "Peer holdtime.";
}
leaf negotiated {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description "Negotiated holdtime.";
}
leaf remaining {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description "Remaining holdtime.";
}
} // session-holdtime
leaf session-state {
type enumeration {
enum non-existent {
description "NON EXISTENT state. Transport disconnected.";
}
enum initialized {
description "INITIALIZED state.";
}
enum openrec {
description "OPENREC state.";
}
enum opensent {
description "OPENSENT state.";
}
enum operational {
description "OPERATIONAL state.";
}
}
description
"Representing the operational status.";
}
container tcp-connection {
description "TCP connection state.";
leaf local-address {
type inet:ip-address;
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 70]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description "Local address.";
}
leaf local-port {
type inet:port-number;
description "Local port.";
}
leaf remote-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "Remote address.";
}
leaf remote-port {
type inet:port-number;
description "Remote port.";
}
} // tcp-connection
leaf up-time {
type string;
description "Up time. The interval format in ISO 8601.";
}
container statistics {
description
"Statistics objects.";
leaf discontinuity-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
mandatory true;
description
"The time on the most recent occasion at which any one or
more of this interface's counters suffered a
discontinuity. If no such discontinuities have occurred
since the last re-initialization of the local management
subsystem, then this node contains the time the local
management subsystem re-initialized itself.";
}
container received {
description "Inbound statistics.";
uses statistics-peer-received-sent;
}
container sent {
description "Outbound statistics.";
uses statistics-peer-received-sent;
}
leaf total-addresses {
type uint32;
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 71]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"The number of learned addresses.";
}
leaf total-labels {
type uint32;
description
"The number of learned labels.";
}
leaf total-fec-label-bindings {
type uint32;
description
"The number of learned label-address bindings.";
}
} // statistics
} // peer-state-derived
grouping policy-container {
description
"LDP policy attributes.";
container label-policy {
description
"Label policy attributes.";
container independent-mode {
description
"Independent label policy attributes.";
container assign {
if-feature policy-label-assignment-config;
description
"Label assignment policies";
choice prefix-option {
description
"Use either prefix-list or host-routes-only.";
case prefix-list {
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Assign labels according to certain prefixes.";
}
}
case host-routes-only {
leaf host-routes-only {
type boolean;
description
"'true' to apply host routes only.";
}
}
} // prefix-option
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 72]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
}
container advertise {
description
"Label advertising policies.";
container explicit-null {
description
"Enables an egress router to advertise an
explicit null label (value 0) in place of an
implicit null label (value 3) to the
penultimate hop router.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"'true' to enable explicit null.";
}
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Prefix list name. Applies the filters in the
specified prefix list to label
advertisements.
If the prefix list is not specified, explicit
null label advertisement is enabled for all
directly connected prefixes.";
}
}
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Applies the prefix list to outgoing label
advertisements.";
}
}
container accept {
description
"Label advertisement acceptance policies.";
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Applies the prefix list to incoming label
advertisements.";
}
}
} // independent-mode
container ordered-mode {
if-feature policy-ordered-label-config;
description
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 73]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
"Ordered label policy attributes.";
container egress-lsr {
description
"Egress LSR label assignment policies";
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Assign labels according to certain prefixes.";
}
}
container advertise {
description
"Label advertising policies.";
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Applies the prefix list to outgoing label
advertisements.";
}
}
container accept {
description
"Label advertisement acceptance policies.";
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Applies the prefix list to incoming label
advertisements.";
}
}
} // ordered-mode
} // label-policy
} // policy-container
grouping statistics-peer-received-sent {
description
"Inbound and outbound statistic counters.";
leaf total-octets {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of octets sent or received.";
}
leaf total-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of messages sent or received.";
}
leaf address {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 74]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of address messages sent or received.";
}
leaf address-withdraw {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of address-withdraw messages sent or received.";
}
leaf initialization {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of initialization messages sent or received.";
}
leaf keepalive {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of keepalive messages sent or received.";
}
leaf label-abort-request {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of label-abort-request messages sent or
received.";
}
leaf label-mapping {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of label-mapping messages sent or received.";
}
leaf label-release {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of label-release messages sent or received.";
}
leaf label-request {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of label-request messages sent or received.";
}
leaf label-withdraw {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of label-withdraw messages sent or received.";
}
leaf notification {
type yang:counter64;
description
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 75]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
"The number of messages sent or received.";
}
} // statistics-peer-received-sent
/*
* Configuration data nodes
*/
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols" {
description "LDP augmentation.";
container mpls-ldp {
presence "Container for LDP protocol.";
description
"Container for LDP protocol.";
container global {
description
"Global attributes for LDP.";
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
uses global-attributes;
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
uses global-attributes;
}
container mldp {
if-feature mldp;
description
"mLDP attributes at per instance level. Defining
attributes here does not enable any MP capabilities.
MP capabilities need to be explicitly enabled under
container capability.";
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable mLDP.";
}
}
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 76]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable mLDP.";
}
}
list address-family {
key "afi";
description
"Per-af params.";
leaf afi {
type ldp-address-family;
description
"Address family type value.";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
container multicast-only-frr {
if-feature mldp-mofrr;
description
"Multicast only FRR (MoFRR) policy.";
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Enables MoFRR for the specified access list.";
}
} // multicast-only-frr
container recursive-fec {
description
"Recursive FEC policy.";
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Enables recursive FEC for the specified access
list.";
}
} // recursive-for
}
container state {
config false;
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 77]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"Operational state data.";
container multicast-only-frr {
if-feature mldp-mofrr;
description
"Multicast only FRR (MoFRR) policy.";
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Enables MoFRR for the specified access list.";
}
} // multicast-only-frr
container recursive-fec {
description
"Recursive FEC policy.";
leaf prefix-list {
type prefix-list-ref;
description
"Enables recursive FEC for the specified access
list.";
}
} // recursive-fec
container ipv4 {
when "../../afi = 'ipv4'" {
description
"Only for IPv4.";
}
description
"IPv4 state information.";
container roots {
description
"IPv4 multicast LSP roots.";
list root {
key "root-address";
description
"List of roots for configured multicast LSPs.";
leaf root-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Root address.";
}
leaf is-self {
type boolean;
description
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 78]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
"This is the root.";
}
list reachability {
key "address interface";
description
"A next hop for reachability to root,
as a RIB view.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The next hop address to reach root.";
}
leaf interface {
type mpls-interface-ref;
description
"Interface connecting to next-hop.";
}
leaf peer {
type leafref {
path
"../../../../../../../../../peers/peer/"
+ "lsr-id";
}
description
"LDP peer from which this next hop can be
reached.";
}
}
} // list root
} // roots
container bindings {
description
"mLDP FEC to label bindings.";
container opaque-type-lspid {
description
"The type of opaque value element is
the generic LSP identifier";
reference
"RFC6388: Label Distribution Protocol
Extensions for Point-to-Multipoint and
Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
Paths.";
list fec-label {
key
"root-address lsp-id "
+ "recur-root-address recur-rd";
description
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 79]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
"List of FEC to label bindings.";
leaf root-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Root address.";
}
leaf lsp-id {
type uint32;
description "ID to identify the LSP.";
}
leaf recur-root-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Recursive root address.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
leaf recur-rd {
type route-distinguisher;
description
"Route Distinguisher in the VPN-Recursive
Opaque Value.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
uses mldp-binding-label-state-attributes;
} // fec-label
} // opaque-type-lspid
container opaque-type-src {
description
"The type of opaque value element is
the transit source TLV";
reference
"RFC6826: Multipoint LDP In-Band Signaling for
Point-to-Multipoint and
Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
Paths.";
list fec-label {
key
"root-address source-address group-address "
+ "rd recur-root-address recur-rd";
description
"List of FEC to label bindings.";
leaf root-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 80]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"Root address.";
}
leaf source-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Source address.";
}
leaf group-address {
type inet:ip-address-no-zone;
description
"Group address.";
}
leaf rd {
type route-distinguisher;
description
"Route Distinguisher.";
reference
"RFC7246: Multipoint Label Distribution
Protocol In-Band Signaling in a Virtual
Routing and Forwarding (VRF) Table
Context.";
}
leaf recur-root-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Recursive root address.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
leaf recur-rd {
type route-distinguisher;
description
"Route Distinguisher in the VPN-Recursive
Opaque Value.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
uses mldp-binding-label-state-attributes;
} // fec-label
} // opaque-type-src
container opaque-type-bidir {
description
"The type of opaque value element is
the generic LSP identifier";
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 81]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
reference
"RFC6826: Multipoint LDP In-Band Signaling for
Point-to-Multipoint and
Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
Paths.";
list fec-label {
key
"root-address rp group-address "
+ "rd recur-root-address recur-rd";
description
"List of FEC to label bindings.";
leaf root-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Root address.";
}
leaf rp {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"RP address.";
}
leaf group-address {
type inet:ip-address-no-zone;
description
"Group address.";
}
leaf rd {
type route-distinguisher;
description
"Route Distinguisher.";
reference
"RFC7246: Multipoint Label Distribution
Protocol In-Band Signaling in a Virtual
Routing and Forwarding (VRF) Table
Context.";
}
leaf recur-root-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Recursive root address.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
leaf recur-rd {
type route-distinguisher;
description
"Route Distinguisher in the VPN-Recursive
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 82]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
Opaque Value.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
uses mldp-binding-label-state-attributes;
} // fec-label
} // opaque-type-bidir
} // bindings
} // ipv4
container ipv6 {
when "../../afi = 'ipv6'" {
description
"Only for IPv6.";
}
description
"IPv6 state information.";
container roots {
description
"IPv6 multicast LSP roots.";
list root {
key "root-address";
description
"List of roots for configured multicast LSPs.";
leaf root-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Root address.";
}
leaf is-self {
type boolean;
description
"This is the root.";
}
list reachability {
key "address interface";
description
"A next hop for reachability to root,
as a RIB view.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"The next hop address to reach root.";
}
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 83]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
leaf interface {
type mpls-interface-ref;
description
"Interface connecting to next-hop.";
}
leaf peer {
type leafref {
path
"../../../../../../../../../peers/peer/"
+ "lsr-id";
}
description
"LDP peer from which this next hop can be
reached.";
}
}
} // list root
} // roots
container bindings {
description
"mLDP FEC to label bindings.";
container opaque-type-lspid {
description
"The type of opaque value element is
the generic LSP identifier";
reference
"RFC6388: Label Distribution Protocol
Extensions for Point-to-Multipoint and
Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
Paths.";
list fec-label {
key
"root-address lsp-id "
+ "recur-root-address recur-rd";
description
"List of FEC to label bindings.";
leaf root-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Root address.";
}
leaf lsp-id {
type uint32;
description "ID to identify the LSP.";
}
leaf recur-root-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 84]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
"Recursive root address.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
leaf recur-rd {
type route-distinguisher;
description
"Route Distinguisher in the VPN-Recursive
Opaque Value.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
uses mldp-binding-label-state-attributes;
} // fec-label
} // opaque-type-lspid
container opaque-type-src {
description
"The type of opaque value element is
the transit Source TLV";
reference
"RFC6826: Multipoint LDP In-Band Signaling for
Point-to-Multipoint and
Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
Paths.";
list fec-label {
key
"root-address source-address group-address "
+ "rd recur-root-address recur-rd";
description
"List of FEC to label bindings.";
leaf root-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Root address.";
}
leaf source-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Source address.";
}
leaf group-address {
type inet:ip-address-no-zone;
description
"Group address.";
}
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 85]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
leaf rd {
type route-distinguisher;
description
"Route Distinguisher.";
reference
"RFC7246: Multipoint Label Distribution
Protocol In-Band Signaling in a Virtual
Routing and Forwarding (VRF) Table
Context.";
}
leaf recur-root-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Recursive root address.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
leaf recur-rd {
type route-distinguisher;
description
"Route Distinguisher in the VPN-Recursive
Opaque Value.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
uses mldp-binding-label-state-attributes;
} // fec-label
} // opaque-type-src
container opaque-type-bidir {
description
"The type of opaque value element is
the generic LSP identifier";
reference
"RFC6826: Multipoint LDP In-Band Signaling for
Point-to-Multipoint and
Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
Paths.";
list fec-label {
key
"root-address rp group-address "
+ "rd recur-root-address recur-rd";
description
"List of FEC to label bindings.";
leaf root-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 86]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"Root address.";
}
leaf rp {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"RP address.";
}
leaf group-address {
type inet:ip-address-no-zone;
description
"Group address.";
}
leaf rd {
type route-distinguisher;
description
"Route Distinguisher.";
reference
"RFC7246: Multipoint Label Distribution
Protocol In-Band Signaling in a Virtual
Routing and Forwarding (VRF) Table
Context.";
}
leaf recur-root-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Recursive root address.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
leaf recur-rd {
type route-distinguisher;
description
"Route Distinguisher in the VPN-Recursive
Opaque Value.";
reference
"RFC6512: Using Multipoint LDP When the
Backbone Has No Route to the Root";
}
uses mldp-binding-label-state-attributes;
} // fec-label
} // opaque-type-bidir
} // bindings
} // ipv6
} // state
container configured-leaf-lsps {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 87]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"Configured multicast LSPs.";
container p2mp {
description
"Configured point-to-multipoint LSPs.";
uses mldp-configured-lsp-roots;
}
container mp2mp {
description
"Configured multipoint-to-multipoint LSPs.";
uses mldp-configured-lsp-roots;
}
} // configured-leaf-lsps
} // list address-family
} // mldp
list address-family {
key "afi";
description
"Per-vrf per-af params.";
leaf afi {
type ldp-address-family;
description
"Address family type value.";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"'true' to enable the address family.";
}
uses policy-container;
container ipv4 {
when "../../afi = 'ipv4'" {
description
"Only for IPv4.";
}
description
"IPv4 address family.";
leaf transport-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The transport address advertised in LDP Hello
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 88]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
messages.";
}
} // ipv4
container ipv6 {
when "../../afi = 'ipv6'" {
description
"Only for IPv6.";
}
description
"IPv6 address family.";
leaf transport-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"The transport address advertised in LDP Hello
messages.";
}
} // ipv6
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"'true' to enable the address family.";
}
uses policy-container;
container ipv4 {
when "../../afi = 'ipv4'" {
description
"Only for IPv4.";
}
description
"IPv4 address family.";
leaf transport-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The transport address advertised in LDP Hello
messages.";
}
container bindings {
description
"LDP address and label binding information.";
list address {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 89]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
key "address";
description
"List of address bindings.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Binding address.";
}
uses binding-address-state-attributes;
} // binding-address
list fec-label {
key "fec";
description
"List of label bindings.";
leaf fec {
type inet:ipv4-prefix;
description
"Prefix FEC.";
}
uses binding-label-state-attributes;
} // fec-label
} // binding
} // ipv4
container ipv6 {
when "../../afi = 'ipv6'" {
description
"Only for IPv6.";
}
description
"IPv6 address family.";
leaf transport-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"The transport address advertised in LDP Hello
messages.";
}
container binding {
description
"LDP address and label binding information.";
list address {
key "address";
description
"List of address bindings.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 90]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
"Binding address.";
}
uses binding-address-state-attributes;
} // binding-address
list fec-label {
key "fec";
description
"List of label bindings.";
leaf fec {
type inet:ipv6-prefix;
description
"Prefix FEC.";
}
uses binding-label-state-attributes;
} // fec-label
} // binding
} // ipv6
} // state
} // address-family
container discovery {
description
"Neibgbor discovery configuration.";
container interfaces {
description
"A list of interfaces for basic descovery.";
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
uses basic-discovery-timers;
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
uses basic-discovery-timers;
}
list interface {
key "interface";
description
"List of LDP interfaces.";
leaf interface {
type mpls-interface-ref;
description
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 91]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
"Interface.";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
uses basic-discovery-timers {
if-feature per-interface-timer-config;
}
leaf igp-synchronization-delay {
if-feature per-interface-timer-config;
type uint16 {
range 3..60;
}
units seconds;
description
"Sets the interval that the LDP waits before
notifying the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP)
that label exchange is completed so that IGP
can start advertising the normal metric for
the link.";
}
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
uses basic-discovery-timers {
if-feature per-interface-timer-config;
}
leaf igp-synchronization-delay {
if-feature per-interface-timer-config;
type uint16 {
range 3..60;
}
units seconds;
description
"Sets the interval that the LDP waits before
notifying the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP)
that label exchange is completed so that IGP
can start advertising the normal metric for
the link.";
}
leaf next-hello {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description "Time to send the next hello message.";
}
} // state
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 92]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
list address-family {
key "afi";
description
"Per-vrf per-af params.";
leaf afi {
type ldp-address-family;
description
"Address family type value.";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable the address family on the interface.";
}
container ipv4 {
must "/if:interfaces/if:interface"
+ "[name = current()/../../../interface]/"
+ "ip:ipv4" {
description
"Only if IPv4 is enabled on the interface.";
}
description
"IPv4 address family.";
leaf transport-address {
type union {
type enumeration {
enum "use-interface-address" {
description
"Use interface address as the transport
address.";
}
}
type inet:ipv4-address;
}
description
"IP address to be advertised as the LDP
transport address.";
}
}
container ipv6 {
must "/if:interfaces/if:interface"
+ "[name = current()/../../../interface]/"
+ "ip:ipv6" {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 93]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"Only if IPv6 is enabled on the interface.";
}
description
"IPv6 address family.";
leaf transport-address {
type union {
type enumeration {
enum "use-interface-address" {
description
"Use interface address as the transport
address.";
}
}
type inet:ipv4-address;
}
description
"IP address to be advertised as the LDP
transport address.";
}
} // ipv6
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable the address family on the interface.";
}
container ipv4 {
must "/if:interfaces/if:interface"
+ "[name = current()/../../../interface]/"
+ "ip:ipv4" {
description
"Only if IPv4 is enabled on the interface.";
}
description
"IPv4 address family.";
leaf transport-address {
type union {
type enumeration {
enum "use-interface-address" {
description
"Use interface address as the transport
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 94]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
address.";
}
}
type inet:ipv4-address;
}
description
"IP address to be advertised as the LDP
transport address.";
}
list hello-adjacencies {
key "adjacent-address";
description "List of hello adjacencies.";
leaf adjacent-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Neighbor address of the hello adjacency.";
}
uses adjacency-state-attributes;
leaf peer {
type leafref {
path "../../../../../../../../../peers/peer/"
+ "lsr-id";
}
description
"LDP peer from this adjacency.";
}
} // hello-adjacencies
}
container ipv6 {
must "/if:interfaces/if:interface"
+ "[name = current()/../../../interface]/"
+ "ip:ipv6" {
description
"Only if IPv6 is enabled on the interface.";
}
description
"IPv6 address family.";
leaf transport-address {
type union {
type enumeration {
enum "use-interface-address" {
description
"Use interface address as the transport
address.";
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 95]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
}
}
type inet:ipv4-address;
}
description
"IP address to be advertised as the LDP
transport address.";
}
list hello-adjacencies {
key "adjacent-address";
description "List of hello adjacencies.";
leaf adjacent-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Neighbor address of the hello adjacency.";
}
uses adjacency-state-attributes;
leaf peer {
type leafref {
path "../../../../../../../../../peers/peer/"
+ "lsr-id";
}
description
"LDP peer from this adjacency.";
}
} // hello-adjacencies
} // ipv6
}
} // address-family
} // list interface
} // interfaces
container targeted
{
description
"A list of targeted neighbors for extended discovery.";
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
uses extended-discovery-timers;
uses extended-discovery-policy-attributes;
}
container state {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 96]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
uses extended-discovery-timers;
uses extended-discovery-policy-attributes;
}
list address-family {
key "afi";
description
"Per-af params.";
leaf afi {
type ldp-address-family;
description
"Address family type value.";
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
container ipv4 {
when "../../afi = 'ipv4'" {
description
"For IPv4.";
}
description
"IPv4 address family.";
list hello-adjacencies {
key "local-address adjacent-address";
description "List of hello adjacencies.";
leaf local-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Local address of the hello adjacency.";
}
leaf adjacent-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Neighbor address of the hello adjacency.";
}
uses adjacency-state-attributes;
leaf peer {
type leafref {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 97]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
path "../../../../../../../../peers/peer/"
+ "lsr-id";
}
description
"LDP peer from this adjacency.";
}
} // hello-adjacencies
} // ipv4
container ipv6 {
when "../../afi = 'ipv6'" {
description
"For IPv6.";
}
description
"IPv6 address family.";
list hello-adjacencies {
key "local-address adjacent-address";
description "List of hello adjacencies.";
leaf local-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Local address of the hello adjacency.";
}
leaf adjacent-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Neighbor address of the hello adjacency.";
}
uses adjacency-state-attributes;
leaf peer {
type leafref {
path "../../../../../../../../peers/peer/"
+ "lsr-id";
}
description
"LDP peer from this adjacency.";
}
} // hello-adjacencies
} // ipv6
} // state
container ipv4 {
when "../afi = 'ipv4'" {
description
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 98]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
"For IPv4.";
}
description
"IPv4 address family.";
list target {
key "adjacent-address";
description
"Targeted discovery params.";
leaf adjacent-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Configures a remote LDP neighbor and enables
extended LDP discovery of the specified
neighbor.";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable the target.";
}
leaf local-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The local address.";
}
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable the target.";
}
leaf local-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The local address.";
}
} // state
}
} // ipv4
container ipv6 {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 99]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
when "../afi = 'ipv6'" {
description
"For IPv6.";
}
description
"IPv6 address family.";
list target {
key "adjacent-address";
description
"Targeted discovery params.";
leaf adjacent-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Configures a remote LDP neighbor and enables
extended LDP discovery of the specified
neighbor.";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable the target.";
}
leaf local-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"The local address.";
}
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable the target.";
}
leaf local-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"The local address.";
}
} // state
}
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 100]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
} // ipv6
} // address-family
} // targeted
} // discovery
container forwarding-nexthop {
if-feature forwarding-nexthop-config;
description
"Configuration for forwarding nexthop.";
container interfaces {
description
"A list of interfaces on which forwarding is
disabled.";
list interface {
key "interface";
description
"List of LDP interfaces.";
leaf interface {
type mpls-interface-ref;
description
"Interface.";
}
list address-family {
key "afi";
description
"Per-vrf per-af params.";
leaf afi {
type ldp-address-family;
description
"Address family type value.";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
leaf ldp-disable {
type boolean;
description
"Disable LDP forwarding on the interface.";
}
leaf mldp-disable {
if-feature mldp;
type boolean;
description
"Disable mLDP forwarding on the interface.";
}
}
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 101]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
leaf ldp-disable {
type boolean;
description
"Disable LDP forwarding on the interface.";
}
leaf mldp-disable {
if-feature mldp;
type boolean;
description
"Disable mLDP forwarding on the interface.";
}
}
} // address-family
} // list interface
} // interfaces
} // forwarding-nexthop
uses policy-container {
if-feature all-af-policy-config;
}
} // global
container peers {
description
"Peers configuration attributes.";
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
uses peer-authentication {
if-feature global-session-authentication;
}
uses peer-attributes;
container session-downstream-on-demand {
if-feature session-downstream-on-demand-config;
description
"Session downstream-on-demand attributes.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if session downstream-on-demand is enabled.";
}
leaf peer-list {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 102]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
type peer-list-ref;
description
"The name of a peer ACL.";
}
}
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
uses peer-authentication {
if-feature global-session-authentication;
}
uses peer-attributes;
container session-downstream-on-demand {
if-feature session-downstream-on-demand-config;
description
"Session downstream-on-demand attributes.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if session downstream-on-demand is enabled.";
}
leaf peer-list {
type peer-list-ref;
description
"The name of a peer ACL.";
}
}
}
list peer {
key "lsr-id";
description
"List of peers.";
leaf lsr-id {
type yang:dotted-quad;
description "LSR ID.";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration data.";
leaf admin-down {
type boolean;
default false;
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 103]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
description
"'true' to disable the peer.";
}
container capability {
description
"Per peer capability";
container mldp {
if-feature mldp;
description
"mLDP capabilities.";
uses mldp-capabilities;
}
}
uses peer-af-policy-container {
if-feature all-af-policy-config;
}
uses peer-authentication;
uses graceful-restart-attributes-per-peer {
if-feature per-peer-graceful-restart-config;
}
uses peer-attributes {
if-feature per-peer-session-attributes-config;
}
container address-family {
description
"Per-vrf per-af params.";
container ipv4 {
description
"IPv4 address family.";
uses peer-af-policy-container;
}
container ipv6 {
description
"IPv6 address family.";
uses peer-af-policy-container;
} // ipv6
} // address-family
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state data.";
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 104]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
leaf admin-down {
type boolean;
default false;
description
"'true' to disable the peer.";
}
container capability {
description
"Per peer capability";
container mldp {
if-feature mldp;
description
"mLDP capabilities.";
uses mldp-capabilities;
}
}
uses peer-af-policy-container {
if-feature all-af-policy-config;
}
uses peer-authentication;
uses graceful-restart-attributes-per-peer {
if-feature per-peer-graceful-restart-config;
}
uses peer-attributes {
if-feature per-peer-session-attributes-config;
}
container address-family {
description
"Per-vrf per-af params.";
container ipv4 {
description
"IPv4 address family.";
uses peer-af-policy-container;
list hello-adjacencies {
key "local-address adjacent-address";
description "List of hello adjacencies.";
leaf local-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Local address of the hello adjacency.";
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 105]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
}
leaf adjacent-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Neighbor address of the hello adjacency.";
}
uses adjacency-state-attributes;
leaf interface {
type mpls-interface-ref;
description "Interface for this adjacency.";
}
} // hello-adjacencies
} // ipv4
container ipv6 {
description
"IPv6 address family.";
uses peer-af-policy-container;
list hello-adjacencies {
key "local-address adjacent-address";
description "List of hello adjacencies.";
leaf local-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Local address of the hello adjacency.";
}
leaf adjacent-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Neighbor address of the hello adjacency.";
}
uses adjacency-state-attributes;
leaf interface {
type mpls-interface-ref;
description "Interface for this adjacency.";
}
} // hello-adjacencies
} // ipv6
} // address-family
uses peer-state-derived;
} // state
} // list peer
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 106]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
} // peers
} // container mpls-ldp
}
/*
* RPCs
*/
rpc mpls-ldp-clear-peer {
description
"Clears the session to the peer.";
input {
leaf lsr-id {
type union {
type yang:dotted-quad;
type uint32;
}
description
"LSR ID of peer to be cleared. If this is not provided
then all peers are cleared";
}
}
}
rpc mpls-ldp-clear-hello-adjacency {
description
"Clears the hello adjacency";
input {
container hello-adjacency {
description
"Link adjacency or targettted adjacency. If this is not
provided then all hello adjacencies are cleared";
choice hello-adjacency-type {
description "Adjacency type.";
case targeted {
container targeted {
presence "Present to clear targeted adjacencies.";
description
"Clear targeted adjacencies.";
leaf target-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"The target address. If this is not provided then
all targeted adjacencies are cleared";
}
} // targeted
}
case link {
container link {
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 107]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
presence "Present to clear link adjacencies.";
description
"Clear link adjacencies.";
leaf next-hop-interface {
type mpls-interface-ref;
description
"Interface connecting to next-hop. If this is not
provided then all link adjacencies are cleared.";
}
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ip-address;
must "../next-hop-interface" {
description
"Applicable when interface is specified.";
}
description
"IP address of next-hop. If this is not provided
then adjacencies to all next-hops on the given
interface are cleared.";
} // next-hop-address
} // link
}
}
}
}
}
rpc mpls-ldp-clear-peer-statistics {
description
"Clears protocol statistics (e.g. sent and received
counters).";
input {
leaf lsr-id {
type union {
type yang:dotted-quad;
type uint32;
}
description
"LSR ID of peer whose statistic are to be cleared.
If this is not provided then all peers statistics are
cleared";
}
}
}
/*
* Notifications
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 108]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
*/
notification mpls-ldp-peer-event {
description
"Notification event for a change of LDP peer operational
status.";
leaf event-type {
type oper-status-event-type;
description "Event type.";
}
uses ldp-peer-ref;
}
notification mpls-ldp-hello-adjacency-event {
description
"Notification event for a change of LDP adjacency operational
status.";
leaf event-type {
type oper-status-event-type;
description "Event type.";
}
uses ldp-adjacency-ref;
}
notification mpls-ldp-fec-event {
description
"Notification event for a change of FEC status.";
leaf event-type {
type oper-status-event-type;
description "Event type.";
}
uses ldp-fec-event;
}
notification mpls-mldp-fec-event {
description
"Notification event for a change of FEC status.";
leaf event-type {
type oper-status-event-type;
description "Event type.";
}
uses mldp-fec-event;
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 109]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
Figure 22
7. Security Considerations
The configuration, state, action and notification data defined using
YANG data models in this document are likely to be accessed via the
protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] etc.
Hence, YANG implementations MUST comply with the security
requirements specified in section 15 of [RFC6020]. Additionally,
NETCONF implementations MUST comply with the security requirements
specified in sections 2.2, 2.3 and 9 of [RFC6241] as well as section
3.7 of [RFC6536].
8. IANA Considerations
This document does not extend LDP or mLDP base protocol specifiction
and hence there are no IANA considerations.
Note to the RFC Editor: Please remove IANA section before the
publication.
9. Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Eddie Chami, Nagendra Kumar,
Mannan Venkatesan, Pavan Beeram for their contribution to this
document. We also acknowledge Ladislav Lhotka for his useful
comments as the YANG Doctor.
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-netmod-routing-cfg]
Lhotka, L. and A. Lindem, "A YANG Data Model for Routing
Management", draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-22 (work in
progress), July 2016.
[I-D.rtgyangdt-rtgwg-ni-model]
Berger, L., Hopps, C., Lindem, A., and D. Bogdanovic,
"Network Instance Model", draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-ni-
model-00 (work in progress), May 2016.
[I-D.saad-mpls-base-yang]
Raza, K., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., Saad, T.,
Bryskin, I., Chen, X., Jones, R., and B. Wen, "A YANG Data
Model for MPLS Base", draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 (work
in progress), May 2016.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 110]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3478] Leelanivas, M., Rekhter, Y., and R. Aggarwal, "Graceful
Restart Mechanism for Label Distribution Protocol",
RFC 3478, DOI 10.17487/RFC3478, February 2003,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3478>.
[RFC5036] Andersson, L., Ed., Minei, I., Ed., and B. Thomas, Ed.,
"LDP Specification", RFC 5036, DOI 10.17487/RFC5036,
October 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5036>.
[RFC5331] Aggarwal, R., Rekhter, Y., and E. Rosen, "MPLS Upstream
Label Assignment and Context-Specific Label Space",
RFC 5331, DOI 10.17487/RFC5331, August 2008,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5331>.
[RFC5561] Thomas, B., Raza, K., Aggarwal, S., Aggarwal, R., and JL.
Le Roux, "LDP Capabilities", RFC 5561,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5561, July 2009,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5561>.
[RFC5918] Asati, R., Minei, I., and B. Thomas, "Label Distribution
Protocol (LDP) 'Typed Wildcard' Forward Equivalence Class
(FEC)", RFC 5918, DOI 10.17487/RFC5918, August 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5918>.
[RFC5919] Asati, R., Mohapatra, P., Chen, E., and B. Thomas,
"Signaling LDP Label Advertisement Completion", RFC 5919,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5919, August 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5919>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 111]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
[RFC6388] Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Minei, I., Ed., Kompella, K., and B.
Thomas, "Label Distribution Protocol Extensions for Point-
to-Multipoint and Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
Paths", RFC 6388, DOI 10.17487/RFC6388, November 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6388>.
[RFC6389] Aggarwal, R. and JL. Le Roux, "MPLS Upstream Label
Assignment for LDP", RFC 6389, DOI 10.17487/RFC6389,
November 2011, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6389>.
[RFC6512] Wijnands, IJ., Rosen, E., Napierala, M., and N. Leymann,
"Using Multipoint LDP When the Backbone Has No Route to
the Root", RFC 6512, DOI 10.17487/RFC6512, February 2012,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6512>.
[RFC6536] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model", RFC 6536,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6536, March 2012,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6536>.
[RFC6826] Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Eckert, T., Leymann, N., and M.
Napierala, "Multipoint LDP In-Band Signaling for Point-to-
Multipoint and Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
Paths", RFC 6826, DOI 10.17487/RFC6826, January 2013,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6826>.
[RFC7060] Napierala, M., Rosen, E., and IJ. Wijnands, "Using LDP
Multipoint Extensions on Targeted LDP Sessions", RFC 7060,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7060, November 2013,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7060>.
[RFC7140] Jin, L., Jounay, F., Wijnands, IJ., and N. Leymann, "LDP
Extensions for Hub and Spoke Multipoint Label Switched
Path", RFC 7140, DOI 10.17487/RFC7140, March 2014,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7140>.
[RFC7246] Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Hitchen, P., Leymann, N., Henderickx,
W., Gulko, A., and J. Tantsura, "Multipoint Label
Distribution Protocol In-Band Signaling in a Virtual
Routing and Forwarding (VRF) Table Context", RFC 7246,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7246, June 2014,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7246>.
[RFC7438] Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Rosen, E., Gulko, A., Joorde, U., and
J. Tantsura, "Multipoint LDP (mLDP) In-Band Signaling with
Wildcards", RFC 7438, DOI 10.17487/RFC7438, January 2015,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7438>.
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 112]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
[RFC7552] Asati, R., Pignataro, C., Raza, K., Manral, V., and R.
Papneja, "Updates to LDP for IPv6", RFC 7552,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7552, June 2015,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7552>.
[RFC7715] Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Raza, K., Atlas, A., Tantsura, J., and
Q. Zhao, "Multipoint LDP (mLDP) Node Protection",
RFC 7715, DOI 10.17487/RFC7715, January 2016,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7715>.
10.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-rtgwg-policy-model]
Shaikh, A., Shakir, R., D'Souza, K., and C. Chase,
"Routing Policy Configuration Model for Service Provider
Networks", draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-01 (work in
progress), April 2016.
[I-D.iwijnand-mpls-mldp-multi-topology]
Wijnands, I. and K. Raza, "mLDP Extensions for Multi
Topology Routing", draft-iwijnand-mpls-mldp-multi-
topology-03 (work in progress), June 2013.
[I-D.openconfig-netmod-opstate]
Shakir, R., Shaikh, A., and M. Hines, "Consistent Modeling
of Operational State Data in YANG", draft-openconfig-
netmod-opstate-01 (work in progress), July 2015.
[RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private
Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, DOI 10.17487/RFC4364, February
2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4364>.
[RFC7307] Zhao, Q., Raza, K., Zhou, C., Fang, L., Li, L., and D.
King, "LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology", RFC 7307,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7307, July 2014,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7307>.
Appendix A. Additional Contributors
Stephane Litkowski
Orange.
Email: stephane.litkowski@orange.com
Reshad Rahman
Cisco Systems Inc.
Email: rrahman@cisco.com
Danial Johari
Cisco Systems Inc.
Email: dajohari@cisco.com
Authors' Addresses
Kamran Raza
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Email: skraza@cisco.com
Rajiv Asati
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Email: rajiva@cisco.com
Sowmya Krishnaswamy
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Email: sowkrish@cisco.com
Xufeng Liu
Ericsson
Email: xliu@kuatrotech.com
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 113]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for LDP and mLDP July 2016
Jeff Tantsura
Ericsson
Email: jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com
Santosh Esale
Juniper Networks
Email: sesale@juniper.net
Xia Chen
Huawei Technologies
Email: jescia.chenxia@huawei.com
Loa Andersson
Huawei Technologies
Email: loa@pi.nu
Himanshu Shah
Ciena Corporation
Email: hshah@ciena.com
Matthew Bocci
Alcatel-Lucent
Email: matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com
Raza, et al. Expires January 9, 2017 [Page 114]