datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.7.1.p2, 2014-10-29
Report a bug

Definition of the Opus Audio Codec
draft-ietf-codec-opus-16

Diffs

Document history

DateVersionByText
2012-09-11 RFC (System) RFC published
2012-07-03 16 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-07-02 16 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-07-02 16 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-07-02 16 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-07-02 16 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-07-02 16 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2012-07-02 16 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-07-01 16 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup was changed
2012-06-28 16 Jean-Marc Valin New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-16.txt (diff from previous)
2012-06-28 15 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
I am clearing my discuss on the agreement that text similar to the following will be added to header of the files:

"This ...[show all]
2012-06-28 15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-28 15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Glad to see the updated copyright statements. Thanks.

As I stated earlier, the files in the git repository cited in the document probably ...[show all]
2012-06-28 15 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-26 15 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-19 15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]



- I agree that Pete's discuss needs to be resolved. It may be
that there's a way to do that without the ...[show all]
2012-06-19 15 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-18 15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-06-18 15 Jean-Marc Valin New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-15.txt (diff from previous)
2012-06-07 14 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-06-07 14 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
At this stage the authors do not need to do anything. I wish to discuss the following with my IETF collegues and will ...[show all]
2012-06-07 14 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
I am saddened that the IETF failed to meet the following goal for this work, i.e. to address the following:

"There exist ...[show all]
2012-06-07 14 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-06-06 14 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
Examining the source files and some of the other files, I find things similar to this:

  Copyright (c) 2011 Xiph.Org Foundation, Skype ...[show all]
2012-06-06 14 Pete Resnick Ballot discuss text updated for Pete Resnick
2012-06-06 14 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
Examining the source files and some of the other files, I find things similar to this:

  Copyright (c) 2011 Xiph.Org Foundation, Skype ...[show all]
2012-06-06 14 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Like others, I don't feel I can give a substantive review to much of this document and will simply trust that it ...[show all]
2012-06-06 14 Pete Resnick Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Pete Resnick
2012-06-06 14 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
(non-blocking comments for the AD and editors)

reference [Burg] has nothing but an author and title; it has to be locatable somehow other ...[show all]
2012-06-06 14 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-06-06 14 Benoit Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-06-06 14 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
p20 says you MUST zero out padding bits. I wondered if
there are any situations where so many zero'd padding bits would ...[show all]
2012-06-06 14 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- I agree that Pete's discuss needs to be resolved. It may be
that there's a way to do that without the ...[show all]
2012-06-06 14 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-06-06 14 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
Is FEC really an accurate title for the mechanism described in section 2.1.7?
2012-06-06 14 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-06-06 14 Brian Haberman
[Ballot comment]
I support both Pete's and Sean's DISCUSS issues.

I will also add that the instructions for extracting the source code does ...[show all]
2012-06-06 14 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-06-06 14 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-06-05 14 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Updated ...

I haven't complete my review (this one is a beast), but I thought I'd start the process rolling:

1) If ...[show all]
2012-06-05 14 Sean Turner Ballot discuss text updated for Sean Turner
2012-06-05 14 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
I haven't complete my review (this one is a beast), but I thought I'd start the process rolling:

1) If we ...[show all]
2012-06-05 14 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
The following command in the appendix don't work:

cat draft-ietf-codec-opus.txt | grep '^\ \ \ ###' | sed -e
      's/...###//' | base64 -d > opus_source.tar.gz

I think ...[show all]
2012-06-05 14 Sean Turner Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Sean Turner
2012-06-05 14 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
I haven't complete my review (this one is a beast), but I thought I'd start the process rolling:

If we're ...[show all]
2012-06-05 14 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-06-05 14 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
[I have not completed my evaluation, but I wanted to get rolling and send this one since it may take some time to ...[show all]
2012-06-05 14 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-06-05 14 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot comment]
A nit:
Section 3., paragraph 1:

[...]
>    the internal framing used to pack multiple frames into a single
>    packet.  This framing is not self-delimiting ...[show all]
2012-06-05 14 Martin Stiemerling Ballot comment text updated for Martin Stiemerling
2012-06-05 14 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot comment]
A nit:
Section 3., paragraph 1:

>    The Opus encoder produces "packets", which are each a contiguous set
>    of bytes meant to be transmitted ...[show all]
2012-06-05 14 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-06-05 14 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Substantive comments; these are non-blocking, but please consider them
seriously, and feel free to chat with me about them:

-- 1.1.3 --
                    clamp ...[show all]
2012-06-05 14 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-06-04 14 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I am balloting No Objection on this document on the basis that it has
no impact on the internet's routing infrastructure, and ...[show all]
2012-06-04 14 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-06-04 14 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-06-04 14 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-05-22 14 Robert Sparks Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-06-07
2012-05-22 14 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued
2012-05-22 14 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-05-22 14 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-22 14 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2012-05-22 14 Robert Sparks
Updated shepherd writeup

(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document
Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document and ...[show all]
2012-05-22 14 Robert Sparks The writeup is
2012-05-21 14 Cullen Jennings Changed protocol writeup
2012-05-21 14 Robert Sparks State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-05-17 14 Jean-Marc Valin New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-14.txt (diff from previous)
2012-05-15 13 Jean-Marc Valin New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-13.txt (diff from previous)
2012-05-10 12 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-05-02 12 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-codec-opus-12, which is currently in
Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA ...[show all]
2012-04-26 12 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2012-04-26 12 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org ...[show all]
2012-04-26 12 Robert Sparks Last call was requested
2012-04-26 12 Robert Sparks State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-04-26 12 Robert Sparks Last call announcement was generated
2012-04-23 12 Jean-Marc Valin New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt (diff from previous)
2012-04-05 11 Robert Sparks
Bleah - I fumbled the tracker UI fairly badly this morning - This draft is still in AD Evaluation, please fogive the noise introduced by the incorrect ...[show all]
2012-04-05 11 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation from Last Call Requested
2012-04-05 11 Robert Sparks Last call was requested
2012-04-05 11 Robert Sparks Ballot approval text was generated
2012-04-05 11 Robert Sparks State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-04-05 11 Robert Sparks Last call announcement was generated
2012-04-05 11 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-04-05 11 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup was changed
2012-04-05 11 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup was generated
2012-03-21 11 Cindy Morgan
>  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
>        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
>        document and, in particular, does ...[show all]
2012-03-21 11 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Jonathan Rosenberg (jdrosen@jdrosen.net) is the document shepherd.'
2012-03-21 11 Cindy Morgan Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard
2012-03-21 11 Cindy Morgan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-03-21 11 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-ietf-codec-harmony
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings Changed protocol writeup
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings Changed protocol writeup
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from Submitted to IESG for Publication
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings Annotation tag Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway cleared.
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings IETF state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from Call For Adoption By WG Issued
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings IETF state changed to Call For Adoption By WG Issued from WG Document
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings Annotation tag Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway set.
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings fixing wacky side state
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings Looks like too trashed formatting of proto write up but it has been email to Secretariat, AD, and is in comment below.
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings
Proto Writeup

Hi Robert,

We'd like to request publication of draft-ietf-codec-opus-11 as proposed standard. (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-opus/).

Proto writeup below.

(1 ...[show all]
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings correcting previous state
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings write up was sent to IESG but just putting this through the states
2012-03-20 11 Cullen Jennings Changed shepherd to Jonathan Rosenberg
2012-02-17 11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-11.txt (diff from previous)
2011-10-31 10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-10.txt (diff from previous)
2011-10-31 09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-09.txt (diff from previous)
2011-08-17 08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-08.txt (diff from previous)
2011-07-09 07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-07.txt (diff from previous)
2011-06-17 06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-06.txt (diff from previous)
2011-03-14 05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-05.txt (diff from previous)
2011-03-10 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-04.txt (diff from previous)
2011-02-15 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-03.txt (diff from previous)
2011-02-04 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-02.txt (diff from previous)
2010-11-14 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-01.txt (diff from previous)
2010-10-15 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.txt