Last Call Review of draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-04
review-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-04-genart-lc-even-2023-10-02-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2023-10-02
IETF LC End Date: 2023-10-11
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The document is ready for publication as a standard track rfc but i have a
question that i defined as a nit

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
The document was changed in 02 from experimental to standard track. There is
text in the end of section 4 about the algorithm being experimental and from
the mailing list i noticed that the reason to make it standard track is to
allow using the TLVs by other WGs.  As an external observer i have no problem
and noticed that the wg chairs approved it and made a comment that it is open
to discussion on the mailing list. Personally i did not see much discussion so
i am curious if this type of document with an experimental section is OK. Of
course you could split the document to two documents one standard track and the
other experimental but as i said this is up to the group and i have no real
objection to publish the document as is.