Last Call Review of draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers-06
review-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers-06-secdir-lc-yee-2023-10-17-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2023-10-20 | |
| Requested | 2023-10-06 | |
| Authors | Tobias Looker , Michael B. Jones | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-10-17 | |
| Completed reviews |
Artart Last Call review of -06
by Claudio Allocchio
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Gyan Mishra (diff) Genart Last Call review of -06 by Ines Robles (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Peter E. Yee (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -07 by Hannes Tschofenig (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Peter E. Yee |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/fP0kRfU5325i6YRngVz71ogSNF8 | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2023-10-17 |
review-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers-06-secdir-lc-yee-2023-10-17-00
Summary: This Internet-Draft replicates the functionality of section 5.3 of RFC 7519 but here for the benefit of CWT claims in COSE headers rather than JWT claims in JOSE headers. To the limits of my understanding of COSE, this brief specification seems reasonable. It points out security considerations (separately from that section of the document) that replicate those found in RFC 7519. I've no objections to this draft. [Ready] Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits: None