Network Working Group L. Iannone
Internet-Draft Telecom ParisTech
Intended status: Informational R. Jorgensen
Expires: March 2, 2014 Bredbandsfylket Troms
August 29, 2013
LISP EID Block Management Guidelines
draft-iannone-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-02.txt
Abstract
This document proposes an allocation framework for the management of
the LISP EID address prefix (requested in a separate document). Such
framework relies on hierarchical distribution of the address space to
RIRs (Regional Internet Registries), who will allocate on a temporary
basis sub-prefixes to requesting organizations.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 2, 2014.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
Iannone & Jorgensen Expires March 2, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft LISP EID Block Management August 2013
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Requirements Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. EID Allocation Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. EID Block Allocation Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. RIRs and Internet Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. Next Steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Iannone & Jorgensen Expires March 2, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft LISP EID Block Management August 2013
1. Requirements Notation
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
2. Introduction
The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP - [RFC6830]) and related
mechanisms ([RFC6831], [RFC6832], [RFC6833], [RFC6834], [RFC6835],
[RFC6836], [RFC6837]) separates the IP addressing space in two
logical spaces, the End-point IDentifier (EID) space and the Routing
LOCator (RLOC) space. The first is used to identify communication
end-points, while the second is used to locate them in the Internet
routing infrastructure topology.
More particularly, for IPv6, an address block has been requested to
IANA to be reserved for exclusive use for EID prefix allocation and
assignment [I-D.ietf-lisp-eid-block].
This document proposes an allocation framework for the EID address
block based on allocation of sub parts of the block to the different
RIR, which in turn will grant temporary allocation to requesting
organizations.
Rationale, Intent, size, and usage of the EID address block is
described in [I-D.ietf-lisp-eid-block].
3. Definition of Terms
LISP operates on two name spaces and introduces several new network
elements. This section provides high-level definitions of the LISP
name spaces and network elements and as such, it must not be
considered as an authoritative source. The reference to the
authoritative document for each term is included in every term
description.
Legacy Internet: The portion of the Internet that does not run LISP
and does not participate in LISP+ALT or any other mapping system.
LISP site: A LISP site is a set of routers in an edge network that
are under a single technical administration. LISP routers that
reside in the edge network are the demarcation points to separate
the edge network from the core network. See [RFC6830] for more
details.
Iannone & Jorgensen Expires March 2, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft LISP EID Block Management August 2013
Endpoint ID (EID): An EID is a 32-bit (for IPv4) or 128-bit (for
IPv6) value used in the source and destination address fields of
the first (most inner) LISP header of a packet. A packet that is
emitted by a system contains EIDs in its headers and LISP headers
are prepended only when the packet reaches an Ingress Tunnel
Router (ITR) on the data path to the destination EID. The source
EID is obtained via existing mechanisms used to set a host's
"local" IP address. An EID is allocated to a host from an EID-
prefix block associated with the site where the host is located.
See [RFC6830] for more details.
EID-prefix: A power-of-two block of EIDs that are allocated to a
site by an address allocation authority. See [RFC6830] for more
details.
EID-Prefix Aggregate: A set of EID-prefixes said to be aggregatable
in the [RFC4632] sense. That is, an EID-Prefix aggregate is
defined to be a single contiguous power-of-two EID-prefix block.
A prefix and a length characterize such a block. See [RFC6830]
for more details.
Routing LOCator (RLOC): A RLOC is an IPv4 or IPv6 address of an
egress tunnel router (ETR). A RLOC is the output of an EID-to-
RLOC mapping lookup. An EID maps to one or more RLOCs.
Typically, RLOCs are numbered from topologically aggregatable
blocks that are assigned to a site at each point to which it
attaches to the global Internet; where the topology is defined by
the connectivity of provider networks, RLOCs can be thought of as
Provider Aggregatable (PA) addresses. See [RFC6830] for more
details.
EID-to-RLOC Mapping: A binding between an EID-Prefix and the RLOC-
set that can be used to reach the EID-Prefix. The general term
"mapping" always refers to an EID-to-RLOC mapping. See [RFC6830]
for more details.
Ingress Tunnel Router (ITR): An Ingress Tunnel Router (ITR) is a
router that accepts receives IP packets from site end-systems on
one side and sends LISP-encapsulated IP packets toward the
Internet on the other side. The router treats the "inner" IP
destination address as an EID and performs an EID-to-RLOC mapping
lookup. The router then prepends an "outer" IP header with one of
its globally routable RLOCs in the source address field and the
result of the mapping lookup in the destination address field.
See [RFC6830] for more details.
Iannone & Jorgensen Expires March 2, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft LISP EID Block Management August 2013
Egress Tunnel Router (ETR): An Egress Tunnel Router (ETR) receives
LISP-encapsulated IP packets from the Internet on one side and
sends decapsulated IP packets to site end-systems on the other
side. An ETR router accepts an IP packet where the destination
address in the "outer" IP header is one of its own RLOCs. The
router strips the "outer" header and forwards the packet based on
the next IP header found. See [RFC6830] for more details.
Proxy ITR (PITR): A Proxy-ITR (PITR) acts like an ITR but does so on
behalf of non-LISP sites which send packets to destinations at
LISP sites. See [RFC6832] for more details.
Proxy ETR (PETR): A Proxy-ETR (PETR) acts like an ETR but does so on
behalf of LISP sites which send packets to destinations at non-
LISP sites. See [RFC6832] for more details.
Map Server (MS): A network infrastructure component that learns EID-
to-RLOC mapping entries from an authoritative source (typically an
ETR). A Map Server publishes these mappings in the distributed
mapping system. See [RFC6833] for more details.
Map Resolver (MR): A network infrastructure component that accepts
LISP Encapsulated Map-Requests, typically from an ITR, quickly
determines whether or not the destination IP address is part of
the EID namespace; if it is not, a Negative Map-Reply is
immediately returned. Otherwise, the Map Resolver finds the
appropriate EID-to-RLOC mapping by consulting the distributed
mapping database system. See [RFC6833] for more details.
The LISP Alternative Logical Topology (ALT): The virtual overlay
network made up of tunnels between LISP+ALT Routers. The Border
Gateway Protocol (BGP) runs between ALT Routers and is used to
carry reachability information for EID-prefixes. The ALT provides
a way to forward Map-Requests toward the ETR that "owns" an EID-
prefix. See [RFC6836] for more details.
ALT Router: The device on which runs the ALT. The ALT is a static
network built using tunnels between ALT Routers. These routers
are deployed in a roughly-hierarchical mesh in which routers at
each level in the topology are responsible for aggregating EID-
Prefixes learned from those logically "below" them and advertising
summary prefixes to those logically "above" them. Prefix learning
and propagation between ALT Routers is done using BGP. When an
ALT Router receives an ALT Datagram, it looks up the destination
EID in its forwarding table (composed of EID-Prefix routes it
learned from neighboring ALT Routers) and forwards it to the
logical next-hop on the overlay network. The primary function of
LISP+ALT routers is to provide a lightweight forwarding
Iannone & Jorgensen Expires March 2, 2014 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft LISP EID Block Management August 2013
infrastructure for LISP control-plane messages (Map-Request and
Map-Reply), and to transport data packets when the packet has the
same destination address in both the inner (encapsulating)
destination and outer destination addresses ((i.e., a Data Probe
packet). See [RFC6830] for more details.
4. EID Allocation Requirements
IANA will allocate EID prefix space to the different RIR according to
the allocation forecast provided by the RIR. To bootstrap the
process it is suggested to allocate a /24 to every RIR.
5. EID Block Allocation Policy
RIRs make available EID addressing prefixes in the reserved space on
a temporary basis and for experimental uses. The requester of the
experimental prefix has to provide a short description of the
intended use or experiment that will be carried out. If the prefix
will be used for activities not documented in the original
description, the RIR issuing the allocation reserves the right to
revoke the allocation.
EID prefixes are allocated on a lease/license basis for a limited
period of time (which can be renewed). The details of the allocation
request and the allocated prefix will be published by RIRs according
to their current existing policy (e.g., public RIR database).
The size of the minimum allocated prefix will follow existing RIR
minimum allocation policy.
When (and if) the LISP technology will change status, not being
"experimental" anymore, and following the policies outlined in
[RFC5226], the EID block will change status as well and converted in
a permanent allocation. RIRs will accept request to convert existing
temporary allocations (without renumbering) in permanent allocation.
The request will respect with RIRs policy for new IPv6 address
allocations. New (not previously existing) allocations in the EID
block space will as well follow RIRs policy for normal IPv6 address
allocation request.
6. RIRs and Internet Experiments
The Regional Internet Registries have already policies dealing
Internet Experiments:
Iannone & Jorgensen Expires March 2, 2014 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft LISP EID Block Management August 2013
o RIPE NCC [RIPE]: Allocations and assignments of Internet resources
for Internet experiments are available. Such allocations or
assignments are temporary. They are intended to support
experimental Internet activities.
o AfriNIC [AfriNIC]: Allocations and assignments of Internet
resources for Internet experiments are available. Such
allocations or assignments are temporary. They are intended to
support experimental Internet activities. Results of experiments
should be made freely available to the public.
o ARIN [ARIN]: Allocations and assignments of Internet resources for
Internet experiments are available. Such allocations or
assignments are temporary. They are intended to support
experimental Internet activities. Results of experiments should
be made freely available to the public.
o APNIC [APNIC]: Allocations and assignments of Internet resources
for Internet experiments are available. Such allocations or
assignments are temporary for a duration of one year, which can be
extended according to the proposed experiment. They are intended
to support experimental Internet activities. Results of
experiments should be made freely available to the public. APNIC
reserves the right to publish archives of all experiments that
receive an allocation.
o LACNIC [LACNIC]: Allocations and assignments of Internet resources
for Internet experiments are available. Such allocations or
assignments are temporary for a duration of one year, renwable for
the same duration. They are intended to support experimental
Internet activities. Results of experiments should be made freely
available to the public. LACNIC reserves the right ot public
archives of all experiments that receive an allocation.
The policy proposed in Section 5 is compatible with the existing RIRs
policy.
7. Next Steps
The document aims at starting discussion in order to address the
concerns raised during the IETF Review of [I-D.ietf-lisp-eid-block],
more specifically the lack of guidelines about the EID Block
allocation and management.
Discussion will be started with the different RIRs to verify
compatibility of the proposed policy and agree on the process for EID
prefix allocation and managament.
Iannone & Jorgensen Expires March 2, 2014 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft LISP EID Block Management August 2013
8. Security Considerations
This document does not introduce new security threats in the LISP
architecture nor in the Legacy Internet architecture.
9. Acknowledgments
Thanks to David Conrad for his comments.
10. IANA Considerations
This document provides only management guidelines for the reserved
LISP EID prefix requested and allocated in [I-D.ietf-lisp-eid-block].
There is an operational requirement for an EID allocation service
that ensures uniqueness of EIDs allocated according to the
requirements described in Section 4. Furthermore, there is an
operational requirement for EID registration service that allows a
lookup of the contact information of the entity to which the EID was
allocated.
IANA must ensure both of these services are provided, for the space
directly allocated by IANA, in a globally uniform fashion for the
duration of the experiment.
11. References
11.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-lisp-eid-block]
Iannone, L., Lewis, D., Meyer, D., and V. Fuller, "LISP
EID Block", draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-04 (work in
progress), February 2013.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4632] Fuller, V. and T. Li, "Classless Inter-domain Routing
(CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation
Plan", BCP 122, RFC 4632, August 2006.
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
May 2008.
Iannone & Jorgensen Expires March 2, 2014 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft LISP EID Block Management August 2013
11.2. Informative References
[APNIC] APNIC, "http://www.apnic.net/policy/experimental-alloc".
[ARIN] ARIN,
"https://www.arin.net/resources/request/
experimental.html".
[AfriNIC] AfriNIC, "https://my.afrinic.net/help/policies/
afpol-tmpal200504.htm".
[LACNIC] LACNIC, "http://lacnic.net/en/politicas/manual10.html".
[RFC6830] Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., and D. Lewis, "The
Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)", RFC 6830,
January 2013.
[RFC6831] Farinacci, D., Meyer, D., Zwiebel, J., and S. Venaas, "The
Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) for Multicast
Environments", RFC 6831, January 2013.
[RFC6832] Lewis, D., Meyer, D., Farinacci, D., and V. Fuller,
"Interworking between Locator/ID Separation Protocol
(LISP) and Non-LISP Sites", RFC 6832, January 2013.
[RFC6833] Fuller, V. and D. Farinacci, "Locator/ID Separation
Protocol (LISP) Map-Server Interface", RFC 6833,
January 2013.
[RFC6834] Iannone, L., Saucez, D., and O. Bonaventure, "Locator/ID
Separation Protocol (LISP) Map-Versioning", RFC 6834,
January 2013.
[RFC6835] Farinacci, D. and D. Meyer, "The Locator/ID Separation
Protocol Internet Groper (LIG)", RFC 6835, January 2013.
[RFC6836] Fuller, V., Farinacci, D., Meyer, D., and D. Lewis,
"Locator/ID Separation Protocol Alternative Logical
Topology (LISP+ALT)", RFC 6836, January 2013.
[RFC6837] Lear, E., "NERD: A Not-so-novel Endpoint ID (EID) to
Routing Locator (RLOC) Database", RFC 6837, January 2013.
[RIPE] RIPE NCC, "http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-526".
Iannone & Jorgensen Expires March 2, 2014 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft LISP EID Block Management August 2013
Authors' Addresses
Luigi Iannone
Telecom ParisTech
Email: luigi.iannone@telecom-paristech.fr
Roger Jorgensen
Bredbandsfylket Troms
Email: rogerj@gmail.com
Iannone & Jorgensen Expires March 2, 2014 [Page 10]