PIM Working Group X. Liu
Internet-Draft Volta Networks
Intended status: Standards Track P. McAllister
Expires: November 20, 2018 Metaswitch Networks
A. Peter
Individual
M. Sivakumar
Juniper Networks
Y. Liu
Huawei Technologies
F. Hu
ZTE Corporation
May 19, 2018
A YANG Data Model for Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM)
draft-ietf-pim-yang-17
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure
and manage devices supporting Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM).
The model covers the PIM protocol configuration, operational state,
and event notifications data.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on November 20, 2018.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Tree Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3. Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2. Design of Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1. Scope of Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.2. Optional Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.3. Datastore Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.4. Module and Hierarchy Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.5. Position of Address Family in Hierarchy . . . . . . . . . 7
3. Module Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1. PIM Base Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.1. High-Level Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.2. Global Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.1.3. Per Address Family Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.1.4. PIM Interface Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.1.5. Neighbor Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.1.6. Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.2. PIM RP Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.2.1. Static RP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.2.2. BSR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.2.3. RP State Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.2.4. RP to Group Mappings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.5. Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.3. PIM-SM Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.4. PIM-DM Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.5. PIM-BIDIR Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4. Complete Tree Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.1. PIM Base Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.2. PIM RP Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
4.3. PIM-SM Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.4. PIM-DM Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.5. PIM-BIDIR Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
5. Relationship to the PIM-STD-MIB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.1. pimInterfaceTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.2. pimNeighborTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
5.3. pimStarGTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5.4. pimSGTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
5.5. pimSGRptTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
5.6. pimBidirDFElectionTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
5.7. pimStaticRPTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
5.8. pimAnycastRPSetTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
5.9. pimGroupMappingTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
6. PIM YANG Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
6.1. PIM base module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
6.2. PIM RP Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
6.3. PIM-SM Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
6.4. PIM-DM Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
6.5. PIM-BIDIR Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
7. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
10. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
Appendix A. Data Tree Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
1. Introduction
YANG [RFC7950] is a data modeling language that was introduced to
model the configuration and operational state of a device managed
using network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or
RESTCONF [RFC8040]. YANG is now also being used as a component of
other management interfaces, such as CLIs.
This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure
and manage devices supporting Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM).
This model supports the core PIM protocol, as well as many other
features described in Section 2.1. Non-core features are defined as
optional in the provided data model.
1.1. Terminology
The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in
[RFC7950].
The following abbreviations are used in this document and the defined
model:
ASM:
Any-Source Multicast service model [RFC3569] [RFC4607].
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
BFD:
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection [RFC5880].
BSR:
Bootstrap Router [RFC5059].
DF:
Designated Forwarder [RFC5015].
DR:
Designated Router [RFC7761].
IGMP:
Internet Group Management Protocol [RFC3376].
MLD:
Multicast Listener Discovery [RFC3810].
MSDP:
Multicast Source Discovery Protocol [RFC3618].
mLDP:
Multipoint extensions for LDP [RFC6388].
MRIB:
Multicast Routing Information Base [RFC3973] [RFC5015] [RFC7761].
mVPN:
Multicast VPN.
PIM:
Protocol Independent Multicast. [RFC3973] [RFC5015] [RFC7761].
PIM-BIDIR:
Protocol Independent Multicast - Bidirectional Mode [RFC5015].
PIM-DM:
Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode [RFC3973].
PIM-SM:
Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode [RFC7761].
RP:
Rendezvous Point. [RFC7761].
RPA:
Rendezvous Point Address. [RFC5015].
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
RPF:
Reverse Path Forwarding. [RFC3973] [RFC5015] [RFC7761].
RPT:
Rendezvous-Point Tree. [RFC7761].
SPT:
Shortest Path Tree. [RFC7761].
SSM:
Source-Specific Multicast service model [RFC3569] [RFC4607].
VRF:
Virtual Routing and Forwarding.
1.2. Tree Diagrams
Tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation defined in
[RFC8340].
In addition, the following notation is used as a placeholder at the
location of the name of a tree node, to represent a section of nodes:
<summary description of a section of nodes>
1.3. Prefixes in Data Node Names
In this document, names of data nodes, actions, and other data model
objects are often used without a prefix, as long as it is clear from
the context in which YANG module each name is defined. Otherwise,
names are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the
corresponding YANG module, as shown in Table 1.
+-----------+--------------------+---------------------+
| Prefix | YANG module | Reference |
+-----------+--------------------+---------------------+
| yang | ietf-yang-types | [RFC6991] |
| inet | ietf-inet-types | [RFC6991] |
| if | ietf-interfaces | [RFC8343] |
| rt | ietf-routing | [RFC8349] |
| rt-types | ietf-routing-types | [RFC8294] |
| bfd-types | ietf-bfd-types | [I-D.ietf-bfd-yang] |
+-----------+--------------------+---------------------+
Table 1: Prefixes and Corresponding YANG Modules
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
2. Design of Data Model
2.1. Scope of Model
The model covers PIM Sparse Mode [RFC7761], including the Source-
Specific subset [RFC3569] [RFC4607], Dense Mode [RFC3973], and Bi-
directional PIM [RFC5015].
The PIM extensions represented in the model include BSR [RFC5059] and
Anycast-RP [RFC4610].
The data model can be used to configure and manage these protocol
features. The operational state data and statistics can be retrieved
by this model. The protocol specific notifications are also defined
in the model.
This model does not cover other multicast protocols such as IGMP/MLD,
MSDP, mVPN, or mLDP in-band signalling. It does not cover any
configuration required to generate the MRIB. These will be specified
in separate documents.
2.2. Optional Capabilities
This model is designed to represent the capabilities of devices
supporting PIM with various specifications, including some with basic
subsets of the PIM protocol. The main design goals of this document
are that any major now-existing implementation may be said to support
the base model, and that the configuration of all implementations
meeting the specification is easy to express through some combination
of the features in the base model and simple vendor augmentations.
There is also value in widely-supported features being standardized,
to save work for individual vendors, and so that mapping between
different vendors' configuration is not needlessly complicated.
Therefore, these modules declare a number of features representing
capabilities that not all deployed devices support.
The extensive use of feature declarations should also substantially
simplify the capability negotiation process for a vendor's PIM
implementation.
On the other hand, operational state parameters are not so widely
designated as features, as there are many cases where the defaulting
of an operational state parameter would not cause any harm to the
system, and it is much more likely that an implementation without
native support for a piece of operational state would be able to
derive a suitable value for a state variable that is not natively
supported.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
For the same reason, wide constant ranges (for example, timer maxima
and minima) are used in the model. It is expected that vendors will
augment the model with any specific extensions and restrictions
needed to adapt it to their vendor-specific implementation.
2.3. Datastore Applicability
This model conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture
(NMDA) [RFC8342]. The operational state data is combined with the
associated configuration data in the same hierarchy
[I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis].
2.4. Module and Hierarchy Organization
This model defines several separate modules for modelling PIM
configuration, defined below. Again, this separation makes it easier
to express the specific capabilities of a PIM device. The module
organization, along with the usage of the YANG extensible features
such as identity, allows the model to be easily augmented for new
capabilities.
The hierarchy of PIM configuration is designed so that objects that
are only relevant for one situation or feature are collected in a
container for that feature. For example, the configuration for PIM-
SM that is not relevant for an SSM-only implementation is collected
in an ASM container.
Where fields are not genuinely essential to protocol operation, they
are marked as optional. Some fields are essential but have a default
specified, so they need not be explicitly configured.
This module structure also applies, where applicable, to the
operational state and notifications of the model.
2.5. Position of Address Family in Hierarchy
This document contains address-family as a node in the hierarchy
multiple times: both under the interface list, and under the PIM
instance.
The reasoning for this is to make it easier for implementations in
which configuration options are not supported for specific address
families.
For these implementations, the restriction that interface
configuration must be address-family independent may either be
expressed as a vendor augmentation of an address-family-independent
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
parameter above the address-family level, or by a constraint on the
base model objects of a form similar to:
deviation "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
+ "pim-base:address-family" {
deviate add {
must "(address-family = 'rt:ipv4' and dr-priority = "
+ "../address-family[address-family = 'rt:ipv6']/"
+ "dr-priority) or "
+ "(address-family = 'rt:ipv6' and dr-priority = "
+ "../address-family[address-family = 'rt:ipv4']/"
+ "dr-priority)" {
error-message
"Error: IPv6 DR priority must match IPv4 DR priority.";
error-app-tag "dr-priority-mismatch";
}
}
}
3. Module Structure
3.1. PIM Base Module
The PIM base module defines the base framework not specific to any
PIM mode, and is imported by the other modules. The base module by
itself does not provide sufficient data for any PIM mode to operate.
Other mode specific and feature specific modules need to be
implemented in addition to this module, depending on the feature set
required by the implementation.
This model augments the core routing data model "ietf-routing"
specified in [RFC8349]. The PIM base model augments "/rt:routing/
rt:control-plane-protocols" as opposed to augmenting "/rt:routing/
rt:control-plane-protocols/rt:control-plane-protocol", as the latter
would allow multiple protocol instances, while the PIM protocol is
designed to be enabled or disabled as a single protocol instance on a
network instance or a logical network element.
3.1.1. High-Level Structure
The high-level structure of the model is shown below:
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
module: ietf-pim-base
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols:
+--rw pim!
+--rw <global configuration>
+--ro <global operational state>
+--rw address-family* [address-family]
| +--rw address-family identityref
| +--rw <per address family configuration>
| +--ro <per address family operational state>
+--rw interfaces
+--rw interface* [name]
+--rw name if:interface-ref
+--rw address-family* [address-family]
+--rw address-family identityref
+--rw <per interface configuration>
+--ro <per interface operational state>
+--ro neighbors
+--ro ipv4-neighbor* [address]
| +--ro address inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro <IPv4 per neighbor operational state>
+--ro ipv6-neighbor* [address]
+--ro address inet:ipv6-address
+--ro <IPv4 per neighbor operational state>
The presence of the top-level container "pim" enables the PIM
protocols.
3.1.2. Global Data
The global configuration and operational state data covers the
support for graceful restart in the PIM base model. Additional
features can be added by augmentation if required by an
implementation.
3.1.3. Per Address Family Data
The support for per address family data is shown below:
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+--rw pim!
+--rw address-family* [address-family]
| +--rw address-family identityref
| +--rw graceful-restart
...
| +--ro statistics
| | +--ro discontinuity-time? yang:date-and-time
| | +--ro error
| | | +--ro assert? yang:counter32
...
| | +--ro queue
| | | +--ro size? uint32
| | | +--ro overflow? yang:counter32
| | +--ro received
| | | +--ro assert? yang:counter32
...
| | +--ro sent
| | +--ro assert? yang:counter32
...
| +--ro topology-tree-info
| | +--ro ipv4-route* [group source-address is-rpt]
| | | +--ro group
| | | | rt-types:ipv4-multicast-group-address
| | | +--ro source-address
| | | | rt-types:ipv4-multicast-source-address
| | | +--ro is-rpt boolean
| | +--ro ipv6-route* [group source-address is-rpt]
| | +--ro group
| | | rt-types:ipv6-multicast-group-address
| | +--ro source-address
| | | rt-types:ipv6-multicast-source-address
| | +--ro is-rpt boolean
...
| | +--ro incoming-interface? if:interface-ref
...
| | +--ro outgoing-interface* [name]
| | +--ro name if:interface-ref
| | +--ro expiration? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| | +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| | +--ro jp-state? enumeration
This is the location that most of the PIM RP module (ietf-pim-rp)
augments. Each of the mode specific modules also augments this
schema tree.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
3.1.4. PIM Interface Modeling
The configuration and operational state data of PIM interfaces is
modeled as below:
+--rw pim!
+--rw interfaces
+--rw interface* [name]
+--rw name if:interface-ref
+--rw address-family* [address-family]
+--rw address-family identityref
+--rw bfd {bfd}?
...
+--rw dr-priority? uint32 {intf-dr-priority}?
+--rw hello-interval? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| {intf-hello-interval}?
+--rw (hello-holdtime-or-multiplier)?
| +--:(holdtime) {intf-hello-holdtime}?
| | +--rw hello-holdtime?
| | rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| +--:(multiplier) {intf-hello-multiplier}?
| +--rw hello-multiplier?
| rt-types:timer-multiplier
+--rw jp-interval? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| {intf-jp-interval}?
+--rw (jp-holdtime-or-multiplier)?
| +--:(holdtime) {intf-jp-holdtime}?
| | +--rw jp-holdtime?
| | rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| +--:(multiplier) {intf-jp-multiplier}?
| +--rw jp-multiplier?
| rt-types:timer-multiplier
+--rw override-interval? uint16
| {intf-override-interval}?
+--rw propagation-delay? uint16
| {intf-propagation-delay}?
+--ro oper-status? enumeration
+--ro gen-id? uint32
+--ro hello-expiration? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
+--ro ipv4
| +--ro address* inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro dr-address? inet:ipv4-address
+--ro ipv6
| +--ro address* inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro dr-address? inet:ipv6-address
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
The support for bfd is achieved by using a grouping provided by an
external module ietf-bfd-types, defined in [I-D.ietf-bfd-yang].
3.1.5. Neighbor Modeling
For each PIM interface, there can be a list of neighbors, which
contain operational state data. To model such data, the following
structure is specified:
+--rw pim!
+--rw interfaces
+--rw interface* [name]
+--rw address-family* [address-family]
+--ro neighbors
+--ro ipv4-neighbor* [address]
| +--ro address inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro bfd-status? enumeration
| +--ro expiration?
| | rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| +--ro dr-priority? uint32
| +--ro gen-id? uint32
| +--ro lan-prune-delay
| | +--ro present? boolean
| | +--ro override-interval? uint16
| | +--ro propagation-delay? uint16
| | +--ro t-bit? boolean
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
+--ro ipv6-neighbor* [address]
+--ro address inet:ipv6-address
+--ro bfd-status? enumeration
+--ro expiration?
| rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
+--ro dr-priority? uint32
+--ro gen-id? uint32
+--ro lan-prune-delay
| +--ro present? boolean
| +--ro override-interval? uint16
| +--ro propagation-delay? uint16
| +--ro t-bit? boolean
+--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
3.1.6. Notifications
The PIM base module also defines the notifications for PIM interface
and neighbor events, as shown below:
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
notifications:
+---n pim-neighbor-event
| +--ro event-type? neighbor-event-type
| +--ro interface-ref? leafref
| +--ro interface-af-ref? leafref
| +--ro neighbor-ipv4-ref? leafref
| +--ro neighbor-ipv6-ref? leafref
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
+---n pim-interface-event
+--ro event-type? interface-event-type
+--ro interface-ref? leafref
+--ro ipv4
| +--ro address* inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro dr-address? inet:ipv4-address
+--ro ipv6
+--ro address* inet:ipv6-address
+--ro dr-address? inet:ipv6-address
3.2. PIM RP Module
The PIM RP module augments the PIM base module to define the
configuration and operational state information scoped to RP related
features:
module: ietf-pim-rp
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw rp
+--rw static-rp
...
+--rw bsr {bsr}?
...
+--ro rp-list
...
+--ro rp-mappings
...
This module is shared by the PIM-SM mode and the PIM-BIDIR mode, but
not by the PIM-DM mode. PIM-SM module and PIM-BIDIR module augment
this module to cover mode specific data.
The following sections describe the features and capabilities covered
in this module.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
3.2.1. Static RP
Static RPs can be configured by using the following portion of the
module:
+--rw rp
+--rw static-rp
| +--rw ipv4-rp* [rp-address]
| | +--rw rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| +--rw ipv6-rp* [rp-address]
| +--rw rp-address inet:ipv6-address
3.2.2. BSR
The support for BSR includes both configuration data and operational
state data, as shown below:
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+--rw rp
+--rw bsr {bsr}?
| +--rw bsr-candidate!
| | +--rw (interface-or-address)?
| | | +--:(interface) {candidate-interface}?
| | | | +--rw interface if:interface-ref
| | | +--:(ipv4-address) {candidate-ipv4}?
| | | | +--rw ipv4-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--:(ipv6-address) {candidate-ipv6}?
| | | +--rw ipv6-address inet:ipv6-address
| | +--rw hash-mask-length uint8
| | +--rw priority? uint8
| +--rw rp-candidate
| | +--rw interface* [name] {candidate-interface}?
| | | +--rw name if:interface-ref
| | | +--rw policy-name? string
| | | +--rw mode? identityref
| | +--rw ipv4-address* [address] {candidate-ipv4}?
| | | +--rw address inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--rw policy-name? string
| | | +--rw mode? identityref
| | +--rw ipv6-address* [address] {candidate-ipv6}?
| | +--rw address inet:ipv6-address
| | +--rw policy-name? string
| | +--rw mode? identityref
| +--ro bsr
| | +--ro address? inet:ip-address
| | +--ro hash-mask-length? uint8
| | +--ro priority? uint8
| | +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro (election-state)? {bsr-election-state}?
| | +--:(candidate)
| | | +--ro candidate-bsr-state? enumeration
| | +--:(non-candidate)
| | +--ro non-candidate-bsr-state? enumeration
| +--ro bsr-next-bootstrap? uint16
| +--ro rp
| | +--ro rp-address? inet:ip-address
| | +--ro policy-name? string
| | +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro rp-candidate-next-advertisement? uint16
3.2.3. RP State Data
This portion of the model provides the operational state information
for all RPs on the router, including the statically configured RPs
and the BSR elected RPs.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+--rw rp
+--ro rp-list
| +--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address mode]
| | +--ro rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| | +--ro mode identityref
| | +--ro info-source-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--ro info-source-type? identityref
| | +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| | +--ro expiration? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| +--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address mode]
| +--ro rp-address inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro mode identityref
| +--ro info-source-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro info-source-type? identityref
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro expiration? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
3.2.4. RP to Group Mappings
The operational state data of the mappings between RPs and multicast
groups is modeled as follows:
+--rw rp
+--ro rp-mappings
+--ro ipv4-rp* [group rp-address]
| +--ro group inet:ipv4-prefix
| +--ro rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro expiration? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
+--ro ipv6-rp* [group rp-address]
+--ro group inet:ipv6-prefix
+--ro rp-address inet:ipv6-address
+--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
+--ro expiration? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
3.2.5. Notifications
The PIM RP module also defines the notifications for RP related
events, as shown below:
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
notifications:
+---n pim-rp-event
+--ro event-type? rp-event-type
+--ro instance-af-ref? leafref
+--ro group? rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
+--ro rp-address? inet:ip-address
+--ro is-rpt? boolean
+--ro mode? pim-base:pim-mode
+--ro message-origin? inet:ip-address
3.3. PIM-SM Module
The PIM-SM module covers Sparse Mode modeling, including PIM-ASM and
PIM-SSM. This module has dependencies on PIM base module and PIM RP
module, both of which are augmented by this module.
The augmentation to the address-family branch of the PIM base module
is shown below:
module: ietf-pim-sm
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw sm
+--rw asm
| +--rw anycast-rp!
| | +--rw ipv4-anycast-rp* [anycast-address rp-address]
| | | +--rw anycast-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--rw rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| | +--rw ipv6-anycast-rp* [anycast-address rp-address]
| | +--rw anycast-address inet:ipv6-address
| | +--rw rp-address inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw spt-switch
| +--rw infinity! {spt-switch-infinity}?
| +--rw policy-name? string {spt-switch-policy}?
+--rw ssm!
+--rw range-policy? string
To support SM mode on an interface, this module augments the
interface branch of the PIM base module, as follows:
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
module: ietf-pim-sm
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw sm!
+--rw passive? empty
This module also augments the PIM RP module to allow an RP to be
configured in the PIM-SM mode:
module: ietf-pim-sm
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv4-rp:
+--rw sm!
+--rw policy-name? string
+--rw override? boolean {static-rp-override}?
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv6-rp:
+--rw sm!
+--rw policy-name? string
+--rw override? boolean {static-rp-override}?
3.4. PIM-DM Module
The PIM-DM module covers Dense Mode modeling. This module augments
the PIM base module, but it has no dependency on the PIM RP module.
module: ietf-pim-dm
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw dm!
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw dm!
3.5. PIM-BIDIR Module
The PIM-BIDIR module covers Bidirectional PIM modeling. Like PIM-SM,
this module augments both PIM base module and PIM RP module.
The followings are the augmentations to the PIM base module, on the
address-family, the interface, and the neighbor branches:
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
module: ietf-pim-bidir
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw bidir!
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw bidir!
+--rw df-election {intf-df-election}?
+--rw offer-interval? uint16
+--rw backoff-interval? uint16
+--rw offer-multiplier? uint8
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family
/pim-base:neighbors/pim-base:ipv4-neighbor:
+--ro bidir-capable? boolean
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family
/pim-base:neighbors/pim-base:ipv6-neighbor:
+--ro bidir-capable? boolean
This module also augments the PIM RP module to extend the
capabilities of RP for the PIM-BIDIR mode:
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
module: ietf-pim-bidir
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv4-rp:
+--rw bidir!
+--rw policy-name? string
+--rw override? boolean {static-rp-override}?
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv6-rp:
+--rw bidir!
+--rw policy-name? string
+--rw override? boolean {static-rp-override}?
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp:
+--ro bidir
+--ro df-election
| +--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address]
| | +--ro rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address]
| +--ro rp-address inet:ipv6-address
+--ro interface-df-election
+--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address interface-name]
| +--ro rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro interface-name if:interface-ref
| +--ro df-address? inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro interface-state? identityref
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro winner-metric? uint32
| +--ro winner-metric-preference? uint32
+--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address interface-name]
+--ro rp-address inet:ipv6-address
+--ro interface-name if:interface-ref
+--ro df-address? inet:ipv6-address
+--ro interface-state? identityref
+--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
+--ro winner-metric? uint32
+--ro winner-metric-preference? uint32
4. Complete Tree Structure
4.1. PIM Base Module
module: ietf-pim-base
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols:
+--rw pim!
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+--rw graceful-restart
| +--rw enabled? boolean
| +--rw duration? uint16
+--rw address-family* [address-family]
| +--rw address-family identityref
| +--rw graceful-restart
| | +--rw enabled? boolean
| | +--rw duration? uint16
| +--ro statistics
| | +--ro discontinuity-time? yang:date-and-time
| | +--ro error
| | | +--ro assert? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro bsr? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro candidate-rp-advertisement? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro df-election? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro graft? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro graft-ack? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro hello? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro join-prune? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro register? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro register-stop? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro state-refresh? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro checksum? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro format? yang:counter64
| | +--ro queue
| | | +--ro size? uint32
| | | +--ro overflow? yang:counter32
| | +--ro received
| | | +--ro assert? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro bsr? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro candidate-rp-advertisement? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro df-election? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro graft? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro graft-ack? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro hello? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro join-prune? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro register? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro register-stop? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro state-refresh? yang:counter64
| | +--ro sent
| | +--ro assert? yang:counter64
| | +--ro bsr? yang:counter64
| | +--ro candidate-rp-advertisement? yang:counter64
| | +--ro df-election? yang:counter64
| | +--ro graft? yang:counter64
| | +--ro graft-ack? yang:counter64
| | +--ro hello? yang:counter64
| | +--ro join-prune? yang:counter64
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
| | +--ro register? yang:counter64
| | +--ro register-stop? yang:counter64
| | +--ro state-refresh? yang:counter64
| +--ro topology-tree-info
| +--ro ipv4-route* [group source-address is-rpt]
| | +--ro group
| | | rt-types:ipv4-multicast-group-address
| | +--ro source-address
| | | rt-types:ipv4-multicast-source-address
| | +--ro is-rpt boolean
| | +--ro expiration?
| | | rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| | +--ro incoming-interface? if:interface-ref
| | +--ro is-spt? boolean
| | +--ro mode? identityref
| | +--ro msdp-learned? boolean
| | +--ro rp-address? inet:ip-address
| | +--ro rpf-neighbor? inet:ip-address
| | +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| | +--ro outgoing-interface* [name]
| | +--ro name if:interface-ref
| | +--ro expiration? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| | +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| | +--ro jp-state? enumeration
| +--ro ipv6-route* [group source-address is-rpt]
| +--ro group
| | rt-types:ipv6-multicast-group-address
| +--ro source-address
| | rt-types:ipv6-multicast-source-address
| +--ro is-rpt boolean
| +--ro expiration?
| | rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| +--ro incoming-interface? if:interface-ref
| +--ro is-spt? boolean
| +--ro mode? identityref
| +--ro msdp-learned? boolean
| +--ro rp-address? inet:ip-address
| +--ro rpf-neighbor? inet:ip-address
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro outgoing-interface* [name]
| +--ro name if:interface-ref
| +--ro expiration? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro jp-state? enumeration
+--rw interfaces
+--rw interface* [name]
+--rw name if:interface-ref
+--rw address-family* [address-family]
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+--rw address-family identityref
+--rw bfd {bfd}?
| +--rw enable? boolean
| +--rw local-multiplier? multiplier
| +--rw (interval-config-type)?
| +--:(tx-rx-intervals)
| | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32
| | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32
| +--:(single-interval)
| +--rw min-interval uint32
+--rw dr-priority? uint32
| {intf-dr-priority}?
+--rw hello-interval?
| rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| {intf-hello-interval}?
+--rw (hello-holdtime-or-multiplier)?
| +--:(holdtime) {intf-hello-holdtime}?
| | +--rw hello-holdtime?
| | rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| +--:(multiplier) {intf-hello-multiplier}?
| +--rw hello-multiplier?
| rt-types:timer-multiplier
+--rw jp-interval?
| rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| {intf-jp-interval}?
+--rw (jp-holdtime-or-multiplier)?
| +--:(holdtime) {intf-jp-holdtime}?
| | +--rw jp-holdtime?
| | rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| +--:(multiplier) {intf-jp-multiplier}?
| +--rw jp-multiplier?
| rt-types:timer-multiplier
+--rw override-interval? uint16
| {intf-override-interval}?
+--rw propagation-delay? uint16
| {intf-propagation-delay}?
+--ro oper-status? enumeration
+--ro gen-id? uint32
+--ro hello-expiration?
| rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
+--ro ipv4
| +--ro address* inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro dr-address? inet:ipv4-address
+--ro ipv6
| +--ro address* inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro dr-address? inet:ipv6-address
+--ro neighbors
+--ro ipv4-neighbor* [address]
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
| +--ro address inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro bfd-state? bfd-types:state
| +--ro expiration?
| | rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| +--ro dr-priority? uint32
| +--ro gen-id? uint32
| +--ro lan-prune-delay
| | +--ro present? boolean
| | +--ro override-interval? uint16
| | +--ro propagation-delay? uint16
| | +--ro t-bit? boolean
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
+--ro ipv6-neighbor* [address]
+--ro address inet:ipv6-address
+--ro bfd-state? bfd-types:state
+--ro expiration?
| rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
+--ro dr-priority? uint32
+--ro gen-id? uint32
+--ro lan-prune-delay
| +--ro present? boolean
| +--ro override-interval? uint16
| +--ro propagation-delay? uint16
| +--ro t-bit? boolean
+--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
notifications:
+---n pim-neighbor-event
| +--ro event-type? neighbor-event-type
| +--ro interface-ref? leafref
| +--ro interface-af-ref? leafref
| +--ro neighbor-ipv4-ref? leafref
| +--ro neighbor-ipv6-ref? leafref
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
+---n pim-interface-event
+--ro event-type? interface-event-type
+--ro interface-ref? leafref
+--ro ipv4
| +--ro address* inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro dr-address? inet:ipv4-address
+--ro ipv6
+--ro address* inet:ipv6-address
+--ro dr-address? inet:ipv6-address
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
4.2. PIM RP Module
module: ietf-pim-rp
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw rp
+--rw static-rp
| +--rw ipv4-rp* [rp-address]
| | +--rw rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| +--rw ipv6-rp* [rp-address]
| +--rw rp-address inet:ipv6-address
+--rw bsr {bsr}?
| +--rw bsr-candidate!
| | +--rw (interface-or-address)?
| | | +--:(interface) {candidate-interface}?
| | | | +--rw interface if:interface-ref
| | | +--:(ipv4-address) {candidate-ipv4}?
| | | | +--rw ipv4-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--:(ipv6-address) {candidate-ipv6}?
| | | +--rw ipv6-address inet:ipv6-address
| | +--rw hash-mask-length uint8
| | +--rw priority? uint8
| +--rw rp-candidate
| | +--rw interface* [name] {candidate-interface}?
| | | +--rw name if:interface-ref
| | | +--rw policy-name? string
| | | +--rw mode? identityref
| | +--rw ipv4-address* [address] {candidate-ipv4}?
| | | +--rw address inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--rw policy-name? string
| | | +--rw mode? identityref
| | +--rw ipv6-address* [address] {candidate-ipv6}?
| | +--rw address inet:ipv6-address
| | +--rw policy-name? string
| | +--rw mode? identityref
| +--ro bsr
| | +--ro address? inet:ip-address
| | +--ro hash-mask-length? uint8
| | +--ro priority? uint8
| | +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro (election-state)? {bsr-election-state}?
| | +--:(candidate)
| | | +--ro candidate-bsr-state? enumeration
| | +--:(non-candidate)
| | +--ro non-candidate-bsr-state? enumeration
| +--ro bsr-next-bootstrap? uint16
| +--ro rp
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
| | +--ro rp-address? inet:ip-address
| | +--ro policy-name? string
| | +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro rp-candidate-next-advertisement? uint16
+--ro rp-list
| +--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address mode]
| | +--ro rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| | +--ro mode identityref
| | +--ro info-source-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--ro info-source-type? identityref
| | +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| | +--ro expiration?
| | rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
| +--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address mode]
| +--ro rp-address inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro mode identityref
| +--ro info-source-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro info-source-type? identityref
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro expiration?
| rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
+--ro rp-mappings
+--ro ipv4-rp* [group-range rp-address]
| +--ro group-range inet:ipv4-prefix
| +--ro rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro expiration? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
+--ro ipv6-rp* [group-range rp-address]
+--ro group-range inet:ipv6-prefix
+--ro rp-address inet:ipv6-address
+--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
+--ro expiration? rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
notifications:
+---n pim-rp-event
+--ro event-type? rp-event-type
+--ro instance-af-ref? leafref
+--ro group? rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
+--ro rp-address? inet:ip-address
+--ro is-rpt? boolean
+--ro mode? identityref
+--ro message-origin? inet:ip-address
4.3. PIM-SM Module
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
module: ietf-pim-sm
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw sm
+--rw asm
| +--rw anycast-rp!
| | +--rw ipv4-anycast-rp* [anycast-address rp-address]
| | | +--rw anycast-address inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--rw rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| | +--rw ipv6-anycast-rp* [anycast-address rp-address]
| | +--rw anycast-address inet:ipv6-address
| | +--rw rp-address inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw spt-switch
| +--rw infinity! {spt-switch-infinity}?
| +--rw policy-name? string {spt-switch-policy}?
+--rw ssm!
+--rw range-policy? string
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw sm!
+--rw passive? empty
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp
/pim-rp:ipv4-rp:
+--rw sm!
+--rw policy-name? string
+--rw override? boolean {static-rp-override}?
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp
/pim-rp:ipv6-rp:
+--rw sm!
+--rw policy-name? string
+--rw override? boolean {static-rp-override}?
4.4. PIM-DM Module
module: ietf-pim-dm
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw dm!
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw dm!
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
4.5. PIM-BIDIR Module
module: ietf-pim-bidir
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw bidir!
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface
/pim-base:address-family:
+--rw bidir!
+--rw df-election {intf-df-election}?
+--rw offer-interval? uint16
+--rw backoff-interval? uint16
+--rw offer-multiplier? uint8
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp
/pim-rp:ipv4-rp:
+--rw bidir!
+--rw policy-name? string
+--rw override? boolean {static-rp-override}?
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp
/pim-rp:ipv6-rp:
+--rw bidir!
+--rw policy-name? string
+--rw override? boolean {static-rp-override}?
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp:
+--ro bidir
+--ro df-election
| +--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address]
| | +--ro rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address]
| +--ro rp-address inet:ipv6-address
+--ro interface-df-election
+--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address interface-name]
| +--ro rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro interface-name if:interface-ref
| +--ro df-address? inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro interface-state? identityref
| +--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
| +--ro winner-metric? uint32
| +--ro winner-metric-preference? uint32
+--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address interface-name]
+--ro rp-address inet:ipv6-address
+--ro interface-name if:interface-ref
+--ro df-address? inet:ipv6-address
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+--ro interface-state? identityref
+--ro up-time? rt-types:timeticks64
+--ro winner-metric? uint32
+--ro winner-metric-preference? uint32
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface
/pim-base:address-family/pim-base:neighbors
/pim-base:ipv4-neighbor:
+--ro bidir-capable? boolean
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface
/pim-base:address-family/pim-base:neighbors
/pim-base:ipv6-neighbor:
+--ro bidir-capable? boolean
5. Relationship to the PIM-STD-MIB
The following sections describe the mappings between the objects in
the PIM-STD-MIB defined in [RFC5060] and the YANG data nodes defined
in this document.
5.1. pimInterfaceTable
pimInterfaceTable is mapped to pim/interfaces/interface. The key of
pimInterfaceTable is pimInterfaceIfIndex and pimInterfaceIPVersion,
while the key of the "interface" list in YANG is the node "name".
For each value of pimInterfaceIPVersion, the "interface" list
contains a corresponding sublist whose key is the node "address-
family".
The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
objects of pimInterfaceTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+------------------------+----------------------------------+
| YANG node | PIM-STD-MIB object |
+------------------------+----------------------------------+
| address-family | pimInterfaceAddressType |
| ipv4/address | pimInterfaceAddress |
| ipv6/address | |
| gen-id | pimInterfaceGenerationIDValue |
| ipv4/dr-address | pimInterfaceDR |
| ipv6/dr-address | |
| dr-priority | pimInterfaceDRPriority |
| hello-interval | pimInterfaceHelloInterval |
| hello-holdtime | pimInterfaceHelloHoldtime |
| jp-interval | pimInterfaceJoinPruneInterval |
| jp-holdtime | pimInterfaceJoinPruneHoldtime |
| bidir/offer-multiplier | pimInterfaceDFElectionRobustness |
| propagation-delay | pimInterfacePropagationDelay |
| override-interval | pimInterfaceOverrideInterval |
+------------------------+----------------------------------+
Table 2: YANG Nodes and pimInterfaceTable Objects
5.2. pimNeighborTable
pimNeighborTable is mapped to pim/interfaces/interface/neighbors/
ipv4-neighbor and pim/interfaces/interface/neighbors/ipv6-neighbor.
The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
objects of pimNeighborTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| YANG node | PIM-STD-MIB object |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| ipv4-neighbor | pimNeighborAddressType |
| ipv6-neighbor | |
| address | pimNeighborAddress |
| gen-id | pimNeighborGenerationIDValue |
| up-time | pimNeighborUpTime |
| expiration | pimNeighborExpiryTime |
| dr-priority | pimNeighborDRPriority |
| lan-prune-delay/present | pimNeighborLanPruneDelayPresent |
| lan-prune-delay/t-bit | pimNeighborTBit |
| lan-prune-delay/ | pimNeighborPropagationDelay |
| propagation-delay | |
| lan-prune-delay/ | pimNeighborOverrideInterval |
| override-interval | |
| ietf-pim-bidir:bidir-capable | pimNeighborBidirCapable |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Table 3: YANG Nodes and pimNeighborTable Objects
5.3. pimStarGTable
pimStarGTable is mapped to pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/
ipv4-route and pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/ipv6-route, when
the value of source-address leaf is "ietf-routing-types:*" and the
value of is-rpt leaf is "false".
The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
objects of pimStarGTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| YANG node | PIM-STD-MIB object |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| ipv4-route | pimStarGAddressType |
| ipv6-route | |
| group | pimStarGGrpAddress |
| up-time | pimStarGUpTime |
| mode | pimStarGPimMode |
| rp-address | pimStarGRPAddressType |
| rp-address | pimStarGRPAddress |
| rpf-neighbor | pimStarGUpstreamNeighborType |
| rpf-neighbor | pimStarGUpstreamNeighbor |
| incoming-interface | pimStarGRPFIfIndex |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
Table 4: YANG Nodes and pimStarGTable Objects
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
In addtion, the object pimStarGPimModeOrigin in pimStarGTable is
mapped to the node rp/rp-list/ipv4-rp/info-source-type or the node
rp/rp-list/ipv6-rp/info-source-type in the YANG module ietf-pim-rp.
5.4. pimSGTable
pimSGTable is mapped to pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/
ipv4-route and pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/ipv6-route, when
the value of source-address leaf is not "ietf-routing-types:*" and
the value of is-rpt leaf is "false".
The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
objects of pimSGTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.
+--------------------+--------------------------+
| YANG node | PIM-STD-MIB object |
+--------------------+--------------------------+
| ipv4-route | pimSGAddressType |
| ipv6-route | |
| group | pimSGGrpAddress |
| source-address | pimSGSrcAddress |
| up-time | pimSGUpTime |
| mode | pimSGPimMode |
| rpf-neighbor | pimStarGUpstreamNeighbor |
| incoming-interface | pimStarGRPFIfIndex |
| is-spt | pimSGSPTBit |
| expiration | pimSGKeepaliveTimer |
+--------------------+--------------------------+
Table 5: YANG Nodes and pimSGTable Objects
5.5. pimSGRptTable
pimSGRptTable is mapped to pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/
ipv4-route and pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/ipv6-route, when
the value of is-rpt leaf is "true".
The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
objects of pimSGRptTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+----------------+---------------------+
| YANG node | PIM-STD-MIB object |
+----------------+---------------------+
| ipv4-route | pimStarGAddressType |
| ipv6-route | |
| group | pimStarGGrpAddress |
| source-address | pimSGRptSrcAddress |
| up-time | pimSGRptUpTime |
+----------------+---------------------+
Table 6: YANG Nodes and pimSGRptTable Objects
5.6. pimBidirDFElectionTable
pimBidirDFElectionTable is mapped to pim/address-family/rp/bidir/
interface-df-election/ipv4-rp and pim/address-family/rp/bidir/
interface-df-election/ipv6-rp. The key of
pimBidirDFElectionTable includes pimBidirDFElectionIfIndex whose type
is InterfaceIndex, while the YANG lists use a node "name" with the
type string instead.
The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
objects of pimBidirDFElectionTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| YANG node | PIM-STD-MIB object |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| ipv4-rp | pimBidirDFElectionAddressType |
| ipv6-rp | |
| rp-address | pimBidirDFElectionRPAddress |
| df-address | pimBidirDFElectionWinnerAddressType |
| | pimBidirDFElectionWinnerAddress |
| up-time | pimBidirDFElectionWinnerUpTime |
| winner-metric-preference | pimBidirDFElectionWinnerMetricPref |
| winner-metric-preference | pimBidirDFElectionWinnerMetric |
| interface-state | pimBidirDFElectionState |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Table 7: YANG Nodes and pimBidirDFElectionTable Objects
5.7. pimStaticRPTable
pimStaticRPTable is mapped to pim/address-family/rp/static-rp/ipv4-rp
and pim/address-family/rp/static-rp/ipv6-rp.
The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
objects of pimStaticRPTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+----------------+----------------------------+
| YANG node | PIM-STD-MIB object |
+----------------+----------------------------+
| ipv4-rp | pimStaticRPAddressType |
| ipv6-rp | |
| rp-address | pimStaticRPRPAddress |
| bidir | pimStaticRPPimMode |
| sm | |
| bidir/override | pimStaticRPOverrideDynamic |
| sm/override | |
+----------------+----------------------------+
Table 8: YANG Nodes and pimStaticRPTable Objects
5.8. pimAnycastRPSetTable
pimAnycastRPSetTable is mapped to pim/address-family/sm/asm/anycast-
rp/ipv4-anycast-rp and pim/address-family/sm/asm/anycast-rp/ipv6-
anycast-rp.
The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
objects of pimAnycastRPSetTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.
+-----------------+-------------------------------+
| YANG node | PIM-STD-MIB object |
+-----------------+-------------------------------+
| ipv4-anycast-rp | pimAnycastRPSetAddressType |
| ipv6-anycast-rp | |
| anycast-address | pimAnycastRPSetAnycastAddress |
| rp-address | pimAnycastRPSetRouterAddress |
+-----------------+-------------------------------+
Table 9: YANG Nodes and pimAnycastRPSetTable Objects
5.9. pimGroupMappingTable
pimGroupMappingTable is mapped to pim/address-family/rp/rp-mappings/
ipv4-rp and pim/address-family/rp/rp-mappings/ipv6-rp.
The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
objects of pimGroupMappingTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+------------+--------------------------------+
| YANG node | PIM-STD-MIB object |
+------------+--------------------------------+
| ipv4-rp | pimGroupMappingAddressType |
| ipv6-rp | |
| group | pimGroupMappingGrpAddress |
| | pimGroupMappingGrpPrefixLength |
| ipv4-rp | pimGroupMappingRPAddressType |
| ipv6-rp | |
| rp-address | pimGroupMappingRPAddress |
| | pimGroupMappingPimMode |
+------------+--------------------------------+
Table 10: YANG Nodes and pimGroupMappingTable Objects
In addtion, the object pimGroupMappingPimMode in
pimGroupMappingTable is mapped to the node rp/rp-list/ipv4-rp/mode or
the node rp/rp-list/ipv6-rp/mode in the YANG module ietf-pim-rp.
6. PIM YANG Modules
6.1. PIM base module
This module references [RFC3973], [RFC5015], [RFC5306], [RFC5880],
and [RFC7761].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pim-base@2018-04-16.yang"
module ietf-pim-base {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-base";
prefix pim-base;
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix "yang";
}
import ietf-routing-types {
prefix "rt-types";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
import ietf-bfd-types {
prefix "bfd-types";
}
organization
"IETF PIM Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pim/>
WG List: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Pete McAllister
<mailto:pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com>
Editor: Anish Peter
<mailto:anish.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Mahesh Sivakumar
<mailto:sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com>
Editor: Yisong Liu
<mailto:liuyisong@huawei.com>
Editor: Fangwei Hu
<mailto:hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>";
description
"The module defines a collection of YANG definitions common for
all PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast) modes.
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2018-04-16 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for PIM";
}
/*
* Features
*/
feature bfd {
description
"Support BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection).";
reference
"RFC5880: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)";
}
feature global-graceful-restart {
description
"Global configuration for graceful restart support as per
RFC5306.";
}
feature intf-dr-priority {
description
"Support configuration of interface DR (Designated Router)
priority.";
reference
"RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.3.2.";
}
feature intf-hello-holdtime {
description
"Support configuration of interface hello holdtime.";
reference
"RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
(PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.3.3.
RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
}
feature intf-hello-interval {
description
"Support configuration of interface hello interval.";
reference
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
"RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
(PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.8.
RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
}
feature intf-hello-multiplier {
description
"Support configuration of interface hello multiplier.";
reference
"RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
(PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.8.
RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
}
feature intf-jp-interval {
description
"Support configuration of interface join prune interval.";
reference
"RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
(PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.8.
RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
}
feature intf-jp-holdtime {
description
"Support configuration of interface join prune holdtime.";
reference
"RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
(PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.8.
RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
}
feature intf-jp-multiplier {
description
"Support configuration of interface join prune multiplier.";
reference
"RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
(PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.8.
RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
}
feature intf-propagation-delay {
description
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
"Support configuration of interface propagation delay.";
reference
"RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
(PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.3.5.
RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.3.3.";
}
feature intf-override-interval {
description
"Support configuration of interface override interval.";
reference
"RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
(PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.3.3.
RFC5015: Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast
(BIDIR-PIM). Sec. 3.6.
RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
}
feature per-af-graceful-restart {
description
"Per address family configuration for graceful restart support
as per RFC5306.";
}
/*
* Typedefs
*/
typedef interface-event-type {
type enumeration {
enum up {
description
"Neighbor status changed to up.";
}
enum down {
description
"Neighbor status changed to down.";
}
enum new-dr {
description
"A new DR (Designated Router) was elected on the connected
network.";
}
enum new-df {
description
"A new DF (Designated Forwarder) was elected on the
connected network.";
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
}
}
description "Operational status event type for notifications.";
}
typedef neighbor-event-type {
type enumeration {
enum up {
description
"Neighbor status changed to up.";
}
enum down {
description
"Neighbor status changed to down.";
}
}
description "Operational status event type for notifications.";
}
/*
* Identities
*/
identity pim-mode {
description
"The PIM mode in which a group is operating.";
}
identity pim-none {
base pim-mode;
description
"PIM is not operating.";
}
identity pim-bidir {
base pim-mode;
description
"PIM operates in the Bidirectional Mode.";
}
identity pim-dm {
base pim-mode;
description
"PIM operates in the Dense Mode (DM).";
}
identity pim-sm {
base pim-mode;
description
"PIM operates in the Sparse Mode (SM).";
}
identity pim-asm {
base pim-sm;
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
description
"PIM operates in the Sparse Mode with Any Source Multicast
(ASM).";
}
identity pim-ssm {
base pim-sm;
description
"PIM operates in the Sparse Mode with Source-Specific
Multicast (SSM).";
}
/*
* Groupings
*/
grouping graceful-restart-container {
description
"A grouping defining a container of graceful restart
attributes.";
container graceful-restart {
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
default false;
description
"Enable or disable graceful restart.";
}
leaf duration {
type uint16;
units seconds;
default 60;
description
"Maximum time for graceful restart to finish.";
}
description
"Container of graceful restart attributes.";
}
} // graceful-restart-container
grouping multicast-route-attributes {
description
"A grouping defining multicast route attributes.";
leaf expiration {
type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
description "When the route will expire.";
}
leaf incoming-interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
"Reference to an entry in the global interface
list.";
}
leaf is-spt {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if SPT (Shortest Path Tree) bit is set to indicate
forwarding is taking place on the (S,G) Shortest Path Tree
(SPT).";
reference
"RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.1.3.";
}
leaf mode {
type identityref {
base pim-mode;
}
description "PIM mode.";
}
leaf msdp-learned {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if route is learned from MSDP (Multicast Source
Discovery Protocol).";
}
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "RP (Rendezvous Point) address.";
}
leaf rpf-neighbor {
type inet:ip-address;
description "RPF (Reverse Path Forwarding) neighbor address.";
}
leaf up-time {
type rt-types:timeticks64;
description
"The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since the
route last transitioned into the active state.";
}
list outgoing-interface {
key "name";
description
"A list of outgoing interfaces.";
leaf name {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Interface name.";
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
}
leaf expiration {
type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
description "Expiring time.";
}
leaf up-time {
type rt-types:timeticks64;
description
"The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since
the oper-status of the interface was last changed to
'up'.";
}
leaf jp-state {
type enumeration {
enum "no-info" {
description
"The interface has no (*,G) Join state and no timers
running.";
}
enum "join" {
description
"The interface has Join state.";
}
enum "prune-pending" {
description
"The router has received a Prune on this interface from
a downstream neighbor and is waiting to see whether
the prune will be overridden by another downstream
router. For forwarding purposes, the Prune-Pending
state functions exactly like the Join state.";
}
}
description "Join-prune state.";
}
}
} // multicast-route-attributes
grouping neighbor-state-af-attributes {
description
"A grouping defining neighbor per address family attributes.";
leaf bfd-state {
type bfd-types:state;
description "BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection) status.";
}
leaf expiration {
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
description "Neighbor expiring time.";
}
leaf dr-priority {
type uint32;
description
"DR (Designated Router) priority as the preference in the DR
election process.";
}
leaf gen-id {
type uint32;
description
"The value of the Generation ID in the last Hello message
from the neighbor.";
}
container lan-prune-delay {
description
"The information of the LAN Prune Delay option in the Hello
message from the neighbor.";
leaf present {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if the LAN Prune Delay option is present in the
last Hello message from the neighbor.";
}
leaf override-interval {
when "../present = 'true'" {
description
"Available only when the leaf present is 'true'.";
}
type uint16;
units milliseconds;
description
"The value of the Override_Interval field of the LAN Prune
Delay option in the last Hello message from the neighbor.
The neighbor uses this value to indicate a short period
after a Join or Prune to allow other routers on the LAN
to override the Join or Prune.";
}
leaf propagation-delay {
when "../present = 'true'" {
description
"Available only when the leaf present is 'true'.";
}
type uint16;
units milliseconds;
description
"The value of the Propagation_Delay field of the LAN Prune
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
Delay option in the last Hello message from the neighbor.
The value is the propagation delay over the local link
expected by the neighbor.";
}
leaf t-bit {
when "../present = 'true'" {
description
"Available only when the leaf present is 'true'.";
}
type boolean;
description
"'true' if the T bit is set in the LAN Prune Delay option
in the last Hello message from the neighbor. This flag
indicates the neighbor's capability to disable Join
message suppression.";
}
}
leaf up-time {
type rt-types:timeticks64;
description
"The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since
the neighbor relationship has been formed as reachable
without beeing timed out.";
}
} // neighbor-state-af-attributes
grouping pim-instance-af-state-ref {
description
"An absolute reference to a PIM instance address family.";
leaf instance-af-ref {
type leafref {
path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family/"
+ "pim-base:address-family";
}
description
"Reference to a PIM instance address family.";
}
} // pim-instance-af-state-ref
grouping pim-interface-state-ref {
description
"An absolute reference to a PIM interface state.";
leaf interface-ref {
type leafref {
path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
+ "pim-base:name";
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
}
description
"Reference to a PIM interface.";
}
} // pim-interface-state-ref
grouping statistics-sent-received {
description
"A grouping defining sent and received statistics
on PIM messages.";
reference
"RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
(PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.7.1.
RFC5015: Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast
(BIDIR-PIM). Sec. 3.7.
RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.9.";
leaf assert {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of Assert messages, with the message Type
of 5 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
}
leaf bsr {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of Bootstrap messages, with the message Type
of 4 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
}
leaf candidate-rp-advertisement {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of Candidate RP Advertisement messages, with the
message Type of 8 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
}
leaf df-election {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of DF (Designated Forwarder) Election messages,
with the message Type of 10 in RFC5015.";
}
leaf graft {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of Graft messages, with the message Type
of 6 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
}
leaf graft-ack {
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of Graft-Ack messages, with the message Type
of 7 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
}
leaf hello {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of Hello messages, with the message Type
of 0 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
}
leaf join-prune {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of Join/Prune messages, with the message Type
of 3 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
}
leaf register {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of Register messages, with the message Type
of 1 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
}
leaf register-stop {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of Register Stop messages, with the message Type
of 2 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
}
leaf state-refresh {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of State Refresh messages, with the message Type
of 9 in RFC3973.";
}
} // statistics-sent-received
/*
* Data nodes
*/
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols" {
description
"PIM augmentation to the routing instance model.";
container pim {
presence
"Enables the PIM protocol.";
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
description
"PIM configuration and operational data.";
uses graceful-restart-container {
if-feature global-graceful-restart;
}
list address-family {
key "address-family";
description
"Each list entry for one address family.";
uses rt:address-family;
uses graceful-restart-container {
if-feature per-af-graceful-restart;
}
container statistics {
config false;
description "A container defining statistics attributes.";
leaf discontinuity-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"The time on the most recent occasion at which any one
or more of the statistic counters suffered a
discontinuity. If no such discontinuities have
occurred since the last re-initialization of the local
management subsystem, then this node contains the time
the local management subsystem re-initialized
itself.";
}
container error {
description "Containing error statistics.";
uses statistics-sent-received {
description
"Statistic counters on the PIM messages per PIM
message Type. Each leaf attribute counts the number
of PIM messages that were of a particular Type (such
as Hello) and contained errors preventing them from
being processed by PIM.
Such messages are also counted by the corresponding
counter of the same Type (such as Hello) in the
'received' container.";
}
leaf checksum {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of PIM messages that were passed to PIM
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
and contained checksum errors.";
}
leaf format {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of PIM messages that passed checksum
validation but contained format errors, including
the errors such as PIM Version, Type, and message
length.";
}
}
container queue {
description "Containing queue statistics.";
leaf size {
type uint32;
description
"The size of the input queue.";
}
leaf overflow {
type yang:counter32;
description
"The number of the input queue overflows.";
}
}
container received {
description
"Containing statistics of received messages.";
uses statistics-sent-received;
}
container sent {
description
"Containing statistics of sent messages.";
uses statistics-sent-received;
}
}
container topology-tree-info {
config false;
description "Containing topology tree information.";
list ipv4-route {
when "../../address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
key "group source-address is-rpt";
description "A list of IPv4 routes.";
leaf group {
type rt-types:ipv4-multicast-group-address;
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
description "Group address.";
}
leaf source-address {
type rt-types:ipv4-multicast-source-address;
description "Source address.";
}
leaf is-rpt {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if the tree is RPT (Rendezvous-Point Tree).";
}
uses multicast-route-attributes;
} // ipv4-route
list ipv6-route {
when "../../address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
}
key "group source-address is-rpt";
description "A list of IPv6 routes.";
leaf group {
type rt-types:ipv6-multicast-group-address;
description "Group address.";
}
leaf source-address {
type rt-types:ipv6-multicast-source-address;
description "Source address.";
}
leaf is-rpt {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if the tree is RPT (Rendezvous-Point Tree).";
}
uses multicast-route-attributes;
} // ipv6-route
} // topology-tree-info
} // address-family
container interfaces {
description
"Containing a list of interfaces.";
list interface {
key "name";
description
"List of pim interfaces.";
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
leaf name {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Reference to an entry in the global interface
list.";
}
list address-family {
key "address-family";
description
"Each list entry for one address family.";
uses rt:address-family;
container bfd {
if-feature bfd;
description
"BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection)
operation.";
uses bfd-types:client-cfg-parms;
}
leaf dr-priority {
if-feature intf-dr-priority;
type uint32;
default 1;
description
"DR (Designated Router) priority as the preference in
the DR election process.";
}
leaf hello-interval {
if-feature intf-hello-interval;
type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
default 30;
description
"Periodic interval for Hello messages.
If 'infinity' or 'not-set' is used, no periodic
Hello messages are sent.";
reference
"RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
(PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised).
Sec. 4.8.
RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse
Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised).
Sec. 4.11.";
}
choice hello-holdtime-or-multiplier {
description
"Holdtime is timer value to time out the neighbor
state when the timer expires.
The holdtime value can be specified either by the
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
given holdtime value or by the calculation of the
hello-interval multiplied by the given value of the
multiplier.";
case holdtime {
if-feature intf-hello-holdtime;
leaf hello-holdtime {
type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
default 105;
description
"Hello holdtime is the amount of time to keep
the neighbor reachable until a new Hello message
is received.";
}
}
case multiplier {
if-feature intf-hello-multiplier;
leaf hello-multiplier {
type rt-types:timer-multiplier;
default 3;
description
"Hello multiplier is the number by which the
hello interval is multplied to obtain the Hello
holdtime.
The value of the Hello holdtime is calculated
as:
hello-holdtime =
(multiplier + 0.5) * (hello-interval)";
}
}
}
leaf jp-interval {
if-feature intf-jp-interval;
type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
default 60;
description
"Periodic interval between Join/Prune messages.
If 'infinity' or 'not-set' is used, no periodic
Join/Prune messages are sent.";
}
choice jp-holdtime-or-multiplier {
description
"Join/Prune holdtime is the amount of time a receiver
must keep the Join/Prune state alive.
The holdtime value can be specified either by the
given holdtime value or by the calculation of the
jp-interval multiplied by the given value of the
multiplier.";
case holdtime {
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
if-feature intf-jp-holdtime;
leaf jp-holdtime {
type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
default 210;
description
"Join/Prune holdtime is the amount of time a
receiver must keep the Join/Prune state alive.";
}
}
case multiplier {
if-feature intf-jp-multiplier;
leaf jp-multiplier {
type rt-types:timer-multiplier;
default 3;
description
"Join prune multiplier is the number by which the
join prune interval is multplied to obtain the
Join/Prune holdtime.
The value of the Join/Prune holdtime is
calculated as:
jp-holdtime =
(multiplier + 0.5) * (jp-interval)";
}
}
}
leaf override-interval {
if-feature intf-override-interval;
type uint16;
units milliseconds;
default 2500;
description
"A short period after a Join or Prune to allow other
routers on the LAN to override the Join or Prune.";
}
leaf propagation-delay {
if-feature intf-propagation-delay;
type uint16;
units milliseconds;
default 500;
description
"Expected propagation delay over the local link.";
}
// Interface state attributes
leaf oper-status {
type enumeration {
enum up {
description
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
"The interface is ready to pass PIM messages.";
}
enum down {
description
"The interface does not pass PIM messages.";
}
}
config false;
description
"PIM operational status on the interface.
This status is PIM specific and separate from the
operational status of the underlying interface.";
}
leaf gen-id {
type uint32;
config false;
description
"The value of the Generation ID this router uses to
insert in the PIM Hello message sent on this
interface.";
}
leaf hello-expiration {
type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
config false;
description "Hello interval expiration time.";
}
container ipv4 {
when "../address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
config false;
description "Interface state attributes for IPv4.";
leaf-list address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"List of addresses on which PIM is operating.";
}
leaf dr-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description "DR (Designated Router) address.";
}
}
container ipv6 {
when "../address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
}
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
config false;
description "Interface state attributes for IPv6.";
leaf-list address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"List of addresses on which PIM is operating.";
}
leaf dr-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description "DR (Designated Router) address.";
}
}
container neighbors {
config false;
description
"Information learned from neighbors through this
interface.";
list ipv4-neighbor {
when "../../address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
key "address";
description "Neighbor state information.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description "Neighbor address.";
}
uses neighbor-state-af-attributes;
} // list ipv4-neighbor
list ipv6-neighbor {
when "../../address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
}
key "address";
description "Neighbor state information.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description "Neighbor address.";
}
uses neighbor-state-af-attributes;
} // list ipv6-neighbor
} // neighbors
} // address-family
} // interface
} // interfaces
} // pim
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
} // augment
/*
* Notifications
*/
notification pim-neighbor-event {
description "Notification event for neighbor.";
leaf event-type {
type neighbor-event-type;
description "Event type.";
}
uses pim-interface-state-ref;
leaf interface-af-ref {
type leafref {
path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface"
+ "[pim-base:name = current()/../interface-ref]/"
+ "pim-base:address-family/pim-base:address-family";
}
description
"Reference to a PIM interface address family.";
}
leaf neighbor-ipv4-ref {
when "../interface-af-ref = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
type leafref {
path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface"
+ "[pim-base:name = current()/../interface-ref]/"
+ "pim-base:address-family"
+ "[pim-base:address-family = "
+ "current()/../interface-af-ref]/"
+ "pim-base:neighbors/pim-base:ipv4-neighbor/"
+ "pim-base:address";
}
description
"Reference to a PIM IPv4 neighbor.";
}
leaf neighbor-ipv6-ref {
when "../interface-af-ref = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
}
type leafref {
path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface"
+ "[pim-base:name = current()/../interface-ref]/"
+ "pim-base:address-family"
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
+ "[pim-base:address-family = "
+ "current()/../interface-af-ref]/"
+ "pim-base:neighbors/pim-base:ipv6-neighbor/"
+ "pim-base:address";
}
description
"Reference to a PIM IPv6 neighbor.";
}
leaf up-time {
type rt-types:timeticks64;
description
"The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since
the neighbor relationship has been formed as reachable
without beeing timed out.";
}
}
notification pim-interface-event {
description "Notification event for interface.";
leaf event-type {
type interface-event-type;
description "Event type.";
}
uses pim-interface-state-ref;
container ipv4 {
description "Containing IPv4 information.";
leaf-list address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description "List of addresses.";
}
leaf dr-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description "DR (Designated Router) address.";
}
}
container ipv6 {
description "Containing IPv6 information.";
leaf-list address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description "List of addresses.";
}
leaf dr-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description "DR (Designated Router) address.";
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 57]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
6.2. PIM RP Module
This module references [RFC5059] and [RFC7761].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pim-rp@2018-04-16.yang"
module ietf-pim-rp {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-rp";
prefix pim-rp;
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-routing-types {
prefix "rt-types";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
import ietf-pim-base {
prefix "pim-base";
}
organization
"IETF PIM Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pim/>
WG List: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Pete McAllister
<mailto:pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com>
Editor: Anish Peter
<mailto:anish.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Mahesh Sivakumar
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 58]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
<mailto:sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com>
Editor: Yisong Liu
<mailto:liuyisong@huawei.com>
Editor: Fangwei Hu
<mailto:hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>";
description
"The YANG module defines a PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast)
RP (Rendezvous Point) model.
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2018-04-16 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for PIM";
}
/*
* Features
*/
feature bsr {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports BSR
(Bootstrap Router).";
reference
"RFC5059: Bootstrap Router (BSR) Mechanism for Protocol
Independent Multicast (PIM).";
}
feature bsr-election-state {
if-feature bsr;
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports providing
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 59]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
BSR election state.";
reference
"RFC5059: Bootstrap Router (BSR) Mechanism for Protocol
Independent Multicast (PIM).";
}
feature static-rp-override {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports configuration
of static RP (Rendezvous Point) override.";
reference
"RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 3.7.";
}
feature candidate-interface {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports using
an interface to configure a BSR or RP candidate.";
}
feature candidate-ipv4 {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports using
an IPv4 address to configure a BSR or RP candidate.";
}
feature candidate-ipv6 {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports using
an IPv6 address to configure a BSR or RP candidate.";
}
/*
* Typedefs
*/
typedef rp-event-type {
type enumeration {
enum invalid-jp {
description
"An invalid JP (Join/Prune) message has been received.";
}
enum invalid-register {
description
"An invalid register message has been received.";
}
enum mapping-created {
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 60]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
description
"A new mapping has been created.";
}
enum mapping-deleted {
description
"A mapping has been deleted.";
}
}
description "Operational status event type for notifications.";
}
/*
* Identities
*/
identity rp-mode {
description
"The mode of an RP, which can be SM (Sparse Mode) or
BIDIR (bi-directional).";
}
identity rp-info-source-type {
description
"The information source of an RP.";
}
identity static {
base rp-info-source-type;
description
"The RP is statically configured.";
}
identity bootstrap {
base rp-info-source-type;
description
"The RP is learned from bootstrap.";
}
/*
* Groupings
*/
grouping rp-mapping-state-attributes {
description
"Grouping of RP mapping attributes.";
leaf up-time {
type rt-types:timeticks64;
description
"The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since
the RP mapping or the RP became actively available.";
}
leaf expiration {
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 61]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
description "Expiration time.";
}
} // rp-mapping-state-attributes
grouping rp-state-attributes {
description
"Grouping of RP state attributes.";
leaf info-source-type {
type identityref {
base rp-info-source-type;
}
description "The information source of an RP.";
} // info-source-type
leaf up-time {
type rt-types:timeticks64;
description
"The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since
the RP became actively available.";
}
leaf expiration {
type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
description "Expiration time.";
}
} // rp-state-attributes
grouping static-rp-attributes {
description
"Grouping of static RP attributes, used in augmenting
modules.";
leaf policy-name {
type string;
description
"The string value is the name to uniquely identify a
policy that contains one or more policy rules used to
determine which multicast group addresses are mapped
to this statically configured RP address.
If a policy is not specified, the entire multicast address
space is mapped.
The definition of such a policy is outside the scope
of this document.";
}
leaf override {
if-feature static-rp-override;
type boolean;
default false;
description
"When there is a conflict between static RP and dynamic
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 62]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
RP, setting this attribute to 'true' will ask the
system to use static RP.";
}
} // static-rp-attributes
grouping rp-candidate-attributes {
description
"Grouping of RP candidate attributes.";
leaf policy-name {
type string;
description
"The string value is the name to uniquely identify a
policy that contains one or more policy rules used to
accept or reject certain multicast groups.
If a policy is not specified, the entire multicast address
space is accepted.
The definition of such a policy is outside the scope
of this document.";
}
leaf mode {
type identityref {
base rp-mode;
}
description
"The mode of an RP, which can be SM (Sparse Mode) or BIDIR
(bi-directional), each of them is defined in a saparate YNAG
module. If a system supports an RP mode, the corresponding
YANG module is implemented.
When the value of this leaf is not specified, the default
value is the supported mode if only one mode is implemented,
or the default value is SM (Sparce Mode) if both SM and
BIDIR are implemented.";
}
} // rp-candidate-attributes
/*
* Configuration data nodes
*/
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim/"
+ "pim-base:address-family" {
description "PIM RP augmentation.";
container rp {
description
"PIM RP configuration data.";
container static-rp {
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 63]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
description
"Containing static RP attributes.";
list ipv4-rp {
when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
key "rp-address";
description
"A list of IPv4 RP addresses.";
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Specifies a static RP address.";
}
}
list ipv6-rp {
when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
}
key "rp-address";
description
"A list of IPv6 RP addresses.";
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Specifies a static RP address.";
}
}
} // static-rp
container bsr {
if-feature bsr;
description
"Containing BSR (BootStrap Router) attributes.";
container bsr-candidate {
presence
"Present to serve as a BSR candidate";
description
"BSR candidate attributes.";
choice interface-or-address {
description
"Use either interface or ip-address.";
case interface {
if-feature candidate-interface;
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 64]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
mandatory true;
description
"Interface to be used by BSR.";
}
}
case ipv4-address {
when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
if-feature candidate-ipv4;
leaf ipv4-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
mandatory true;
description
"IP address to be used by BSR.";
}
}
case ipv6-address {
when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
}
if-feature candidate-ipv6;
leaf ipv6-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
mandatory true;
description
"IP address to be used by BSR.";
}
}
}
leaf hash-mask-length{
type uint8 {
range "0..128";
}
mandatory true;
description
"Value contained in BSR messages used by all routers to
hash (map) to an RP.";
}
leaf priority {
type uint8 {
range "0..255";
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 65]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
}
default 64;
description
"BSR election priority among different candidate BSRs.
A larger value has a higher priority over a smaller
value.";
}
} // bsr-candidate
container rp-candidate {
description
"Containing RP candidate attributes.";
list interface {
if-feature candidate-interface;
key "name";
description
"A list of RP candidates";
leaf name {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Interface that the RP candidate uses.";
}
uses rp-candidate-attributes;
}
list ipv4-address {
when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
if-feature candidate-ipv4;
key "address";
description
"A list of RP candidate addresses.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 address that the RP candidate uses.";
}
uses rp-candidate-attributes;
}
list ipv6-address {
when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
}
if-feature candidate-ipv6;
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 66]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
key "address";
description
"A list of RP candidate addresses.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 address that the RP candidate uses.";
}
uses rp-candidate-attributes;
}
}
// BSR state attributes.
container bsr {
config false;
description
"BSR information.";
leaf address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "BSR address";
}
leaf hash-mask-length {
type uint8 {
range "0..128";
}
description "Hash mask length.";
}
leaf priority {
type uint8 {
range "0..255";
}
description "Priority.";
}
leaf up-time {
type rt-types:timeticks64;
description
"The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second)
since the BSR became up.";
}
}
choice election-state {
if-feature bsr-election-state;
config false;
description "BSR election state.";
case candidate {
leaf candidate-bsr-state {
type enumeration {
enum "candidate" {
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 67]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
description
"The router is a candidate to be the BSR for the
scope zone, but currently another router is the
preferred BSR.";
}
enum "pending" {
description
"The router is a candidate to be the BSR for the
scope zone. Currently, no other router is the
preferred BSR, but this router is not yet the
elected BSR. This is a temporary state that
prevents rapid thrashing of the choice of BSR
during BSR election.";
}
enum "elected" {
description
"The router is the elected BSR for the scope zone
and it must perform all the BSR functions.";
}
}
description
"Candidate-BSR state.";
reference
"RFC5059, Section 3.1.1.";
}
}
case "non-candidate" {
leaf non-candidate-bsr-state {
type enumeration {
enum "no-info" {
description
"The router has no information about this scope
zone.";
}
enum "accept-any" {
description
"The router does not know of an active BSR, and
will accept the first Bootstrap message it sees
as giving the new BSR's identity and the
RP-Set.";
}
enum "accept" {
description
"The router knows the identity of the current
BSR, and is using the RP-Set provided by that
BSR. Only Bootstrap messages from that BSR or
from a Candidate-BSR (C-BSR) with higher weight
than the current BSR will be accepted.";
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 68]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
}
}
description
"Non-candidate-BSR state.";
reference
"RFC5059, Section 3.1.2.";
}
}
} // election-state
leaf bsr-next-bootstrap {
type uint16;
units seconds;
config false;
description
"The remaining time interval in seconds until the next
bootstrap will be sent.";
}
container rp {
config false;
description
"State information of the RP.";
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "RP address.";
}
leaf policy-name {
type string;
description
"The string value is the name to uniquely identify a
policy that contains one or more policy rules used to
accept or reject certain multicast groups.
If a policy is not specified, the entire multicast
address space is accepted.
The definition of such a policy is outside the scope
of this document.";
}
leaf up-time {
type rt-types:timeticks64;
description
"The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second)
since the RP became actively available.";
}
}
leaf rp-candidate-next-advertisement {
type uint16;
units seconds;
config false;
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 69]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
description
"The remaining time interval in seconds until the next
RP candidate advertisement will be sent.";
}
} // bsr
container rp-list {
config false;
description
"Containing a list of RPs.";
list ipv4-rp {
when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
key "rp-address mode";
description
"A list of IPv4 RP addresses.";
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"RP address.";
}
leaf mode {
type identityref {
base rp-mode;
}
description
"RP mode.";
}
leaf info-source-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The address where RP information is learned.";
}
uses rp-state-attributes;
}
list ipv6-rp {
when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
}
key "rp-address mode";
description
"A list of IPv6 RP addresses.";
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 70]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
description
"RP address.";
}
leaf mode {
type identityref {
base rp-mode;
}
description
"RP mode.";
}
leaf info-source-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"The address where RP information is learned.";
}
uses rp-state-attributes;
}
} // rp-list
container rp-mappings {
config false;
description
"Containing a list of group-to-RP mappings.";
list ipv4-rp {
when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
key "group-range rp-address";
description
"A list of group-to-RP mappings.";
leaf group-range {
type inet:ipv4-prefix;
description
"Group range presented in the format of prefix.";
}
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"RP address.";
}
uses rp-mapping-state-attributes;
}
list ipv6-rp {
when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 71]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
}
key "group-range rp-address";
description
"A list of IPv6 RP addresses.";
leaf group-range {
type inet:ipv6-prefix;
description
"Group range presented in the format of prefix.";
}
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"RP address.";
}
uses rp-mapping-state-attributes;
}
} // rp-mappings
} // rp
} // augment
/*
* Notifications
*/
notification pim-rp-event {
description "Notification event for RP.";
leaf event-type {
type rp-event-type;
description "Event type.";
}
uses pim-base:pim-instance-af-state-ref;
leaf group {
type rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address;
description "Group address.";
}
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "RP address.";
}
leaf is-rpt {
type boolean;
description "'true' if the tree is RPT (RP-Tree).";
}
leaf mode {
type identityref {
base pim-base:pim-mode;
}
description "PIM mode.";
}
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 72]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
leaf message-origin {
type inet:ip-address;
description "Where the message is originated.";
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
6.3. PIM-SM Module
This module references [RFC4607] and [RFC7761].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pim-sm@2018-04-16.yang"
module ietf-pim-sm {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-sm";
prefix pim-sm;
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
import ietf-pim-base {
prefix "pim-base";
}
import ietf-pim-rp {
prefix "pim-rp";
}
organization
"IETF PIM Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pim/>
WG List: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Pete McAllister
<mailto:pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com>
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 73]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
Editor: Anish Peter
<mailto:anish.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Mahesh Sivakumar
<mailto:sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com>
Editor: Yisong Liu
<mailto:liuyisong@huawei.com>
Editor: Fangwei Hu
<mailto:hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>";
description
"The YANG module defines a PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast)
SM (Sparse Mode) model.
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2018-04-16 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for PIM.
RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.2.";
}
/*
* Features
*/
feature spt-switch-infinity {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports configuration
choice whether to trigger the switchover from the RPT
(Rendezvous Point Tree) to the SPT (Shortest Path Tree).";
reference
"RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 74]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.2.";
}
feature spt-switch-policy {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports configuring
policy for the switchover from the RPT to the SPT.";
reference
"RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.2.";
}
/*
* Identities
*/
identity rp-sm {
base pim-rp:rp-mode;
description
"SM (Sparse Mode).";
}
/*
* Groupings
*/
grouping static-rp-sm-container {
description
"Grouping that contains SM attributes for static RP.";
container sm {
presence
"Indicate the support of sparse mode.";
description
"PIM SM configuration data.";
uses pim-rp:static-rp-attributes;
} // sm
} // static-rp-sm-container
/*
* Configuration data nodes
*/
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim/"
+ "pim-base:address-family" {
description "PIM SM augmentation.";
container sm {
description
"PIM SM configuration data.";
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 75]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
container asm {
description
"ASM (Any Source Multicast) attributes.";
container anycast-rp {
presence
"Present to enable anycast RP (Rendezvous Point).";
description
"Anycast RP attributes.";
list ipv4-anycast-rp {
when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
key "anycast-address rp-address";
description
"A list of IPv4 anycast RP settings, only applicable
when pim-base:address-family is IPv4.";
leaf anycast-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IP address of the anycast RP set. This IP address
is used by the multicast groups or sources to join
or register.";
}
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IP address of the router configured with anycast
RP. This is the IP address where the Register
messages are forwarded.";
}
}
list ipv6-anycast-rp {
when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
}
key "anycast-address rp-address";
description
"A list of IPv6 anycast RP settings, only applicable
when pim-base:address-family is IPv6.";
leaf anycast-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IP address of the anycast RP set. This IP address
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 76]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
is used by the multicast groups or sources to join
or register.";
}
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IP address of the router configured with anycast
RP. This is the IP address where the Register
messages are forwarded.";
}
}
}
container spt-switch {
description
"SPT (Shortest Path Tree) switching attributes.";
container infinity {
if-feature spt-switch-infinity;
presence
"Present if SPT switchover threshold is set to
infinity, according to the policy specified below.";
description
"The receiver's DR (Designated Router) never triggers
the switchover from the RPT to the SPT.";
leaf policy-name {
if-feature spt-switch-policy;
type string;
description
"The string value is the name to uniquely identify a
policy that contains one or more policy rules used
to accept or reject certain multicast groups.
The groups accepted by this policy have the SPT
switchover threshold set to infinity, meaning that
they will stay on the shared tree forever.
If a policy is not specified, the entire multicast
address space is accepted.
The definition of such a policy is outside the scope
of this document.";
}
} // infinity
}
} // asm
container ssm {
presence
"Present to enable SSM (Source-Specific Multicast).";
description
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 77]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
"SSM (Source-Specific Multicast) attributes.";
leaf range-policy {
type string;
description
"The string value is the name to uniquely identify a
policy that contains one or more policy rules used
to accept or reject certain multicast groups.
The groups accepted by this policy define the multicast
group rang used by SSM.
If a policy is not specified, the default SSM multicast
group rang is used.
The default SSM multicast group range is 232.0.0.0/8 for
IPv4 and ff3x::/96 for IPv6 where x reprents any valid
scope identifier.
The definition of such a policy is outside the scope
of this document.";
reference
"RFC4607: Source-Specific Multicast for IP.";
}
} // ssm
} // sm
} // augment
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim/"
+ "pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
+ "pim-base:address-family" {
description "PIM SM augmentation.";
container sm {
presence "Present to enable sparse-mode.";
description
"PIM SM configuration data.";
leaf passive {
type empty;
description
"Specifies that no PIM messages are sent or accepted on
this PIM interface, but the interface can be included in a
multicast forwarding entry.";
}
} // sm
} // augment
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim/"
+ "pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/"
+ "pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv4-rp" {
description "PIM SM augmentation.";
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 78]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
uses static-rp-sm-container;
} // augment
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim/"
+ "pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/"
+ "pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv6-rp" {
description "PIM SM augmentation.";
uses static-rp-sm-container;
} // augment
}
<CODE ENDS>
6.4. PIM-DM Module
This module references [RFC3973].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pim-dm@2018-04-16.yang"
module ietf-pim-dm {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-dm";
prefix pim-dm;
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
import ietf-pim-base {
prefix "pim-base";
}
organization
"IETF PIM Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pim/>
WG List: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Pete McAllister
<mailto:pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com>
Editor: Anish Peter
<mailto:anish.ietf@gmail.com>
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 79]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
Editor: Mahesh Sivakumar
<mailto:sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com>
Editor: Yisong Liu
<mailto:liuyisong@huawei.com>
Editor: Fangwei Hu
<mailto:hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>";
description
"The YANG module defines a PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast)
DM (Dense Mode) model.
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2018-04-16 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for PIM.
RFC 3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
(PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised).";
}
/*
* Configuration data nodes
*/
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family" {
description "PIM DM (Dense Mode) augmentation.";
container dm {
presence "Present to enable dense-mode.";
description
"PIM DM configuration data.";
} // Dm
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 80]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
} // augment
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
+ "pim-base:address-family" {
description "PIM DM augmentation to PIM base interface.";
container dm {
presence "Present to enable dense-mode.";
description
"PIM DM configuration data.";
} // sm
} // augment
}
<CODE ENDS>
6.5. PIM-BIDIR Module
This module references [RFC5015].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pim-bidir@2018-04-16.yang"
module ietf-pim-bidir {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-bidir";
prefix pim-bidir;
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-routing-types {
prefix "rt-types";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
import ietf-pim-base {
prefix "pim-base";
}
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 81]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
import ietf-pim-rp {
prefix "pim-rp";
}
organization
"IETF PIM Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pim/>
WG List: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Pete McAllister
<mailto:pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com>
Editor: Anish Peter
<mailto:anish.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Mahesh Sivakumar
<mailto:sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com>
Editor: Yisong Liu
<mailto:liuyisong@huawei.com>
Editor: Fangwei Hu
<mailto:hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>";
description
"The YANG module defines a PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast)
BIDIR (Bidirectional) mode model.
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2018-04-16 {
description
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 82]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for PIM.
RFC5015: Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast
(BIDIR-PIM).";
}
/*
* Features
*/
feature intf-df-election {
description
"Support configuration of interface DF election.";
reference
"RFC5015: Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast
(BIDIR-PIM). Sec. 3.5.";
}
/*
* Identities
*/
identity rp-bidir {
base pim-rp:rp-mode;
description
"BIDIR (Bidirectional) mode.";
}
identity df-state {
description
"DF (Designated Forwarder) election state type.";
reference
"RFC5015: Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast
(BIDIR-PIM).";
}
identity df-state-offer {
base df-state;
description
"Initial election state. When in the Offer state, a router
thinks it can eventually become the winner and periodically
generates Offer messages.";
}
identity df-state-lose {
base df-state;
description
"There either is a different election winner or that no
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 83]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
router on the link has a path to the RPA (Rendezvous-Point
Address).";
}
identity df-state-win {
base df-state;
description
"The router is the acting DF without any contest.";
}
identity df-state-backoff {
base df-state;
description
"The router is the acting DF but another router has made a
bid to take over.";
}
/*
* Groupings
*/
grouping static-rp-bidir-container {
description
"Grouping that contains BIDIR (Bidirectional) attributes for
static RP (Rendezvous-Point).";
container bidir {
presence
"Indicate the support of BIDIR mode.";
description
"PIM BIDIR configuration data.";
uses pim-rp:static-rp-attributes;
} // bidir
} // static-rp-bidir-container
grouping interface-df-election-state-attributes {
description
"Grouping that contains the state attributes of a DF election
on an interface.";
leaf interface-state {
type identityref {
base df-state;
}
description
"Interface state with respect to the DF election.";
}
leaf up-time {
type rt-types:timeticks64;
description
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 84]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
"The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since the
current DF has been elected as the winner.";
}
leaf winner-metric {
type uint32;
description
"The unicast routing metric used by the DF to reach the RP.
The value is announced by the DF.";
}
leaf winner-metric-preference {
type uint32;
description
"The preference value assigned to the unicast routing
protocol that the DF used to obtain the route to the RP.
The value is announced by the DF.";
}
} // interface-df-election-state-attributes
/*
* Configuration data and operational state date nodes
*/
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family" {
description "PIM BIDIR (Bidirectional) augmentation.";
container bidir {
presence "Present to enable BIDIR mode.";
description
"PIM BIDIR configuration data.";
} // bidir
} // augment
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
+ "pim-base:address-family" {
description "PIM BIDIR augmentation.";
container bidir {
presence "Present to enable BIDIR mode.";
description
"PIM BIDIR configuration data.";
container df-election {
if-feature intf-df-election;
description
"DF election attributes.";
leaf offer-interval {
type uint16;
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 85]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
units milliseconds;
default 100;
description
"Offer interval specifies the interval between repeated
DF election messages.";
}
leaf backoff-interval {
type uint16;
units milliseconds;
default 1000;
description
"This is the interval that the acting DF waits between
receiving a better DF Offer and sending the Pass message
to transfer DF responsibility";
}
leaf offer-multiplier {
type uint8;
default 3;
description
"This is number of transmission attempts for DF election
messages.
When a DF election Offer or Winner message fails to be
received, the message is retransmitted.
The offer-multiplier sets the minimum number of DF
election messages that must fail to be received for DF
election to fail.
If a router receives from a neighbor a better offer than
its own, the router stops participating in the election
for a period of offer-multiplier * offer-interval.
Eventually, all routers except the best candidate stop
sending Offer messages.";
}
} // df-election
} // bidir
} // augment
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/"
+ "pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv4-rp" {
description "PIM BIDIR augmentation.";
uses static-rp-bidir-container;
} // augment
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/"
+ "pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv6-rp" {
description "PIM BIDIR augmentation.";
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 86]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
uses static-rp-bidir-container;
} // augment
/*
* Operational state data nodes
*/
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp" {
description "PIM BIDIR augmentation to RP state data.";
container bidir {
config false;
description
"PIM BIDIR state data.";
container df-election {
description
"DF election data.";
list ipv4-rp {
when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
key "rp-address";
description
"A list of IPv4 RP addresses.";
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The address of the RP.";
}
} // ipv4-rp
list ipv6-rp {
when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
}
key "rp-address";
description
"A list of IPv6 RP addresses.";
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"The address of the RP.";
}
} // ipv6-rp
} // df-election
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 87]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
container interface-df-election {
description
"Interface DF election data.";
list ipv4-rp {
when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
}
key "rp-address interface-name";
description
"A list of IPv4 RP addresses.";
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The address of the RP.";
}
leaf interface-name {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"The name of the interface for which the DF state is
being maintained.";
}
leaf df-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The address of the elected DF, which is the winner of
the DF Election process.";
}
uses interface-df-election-state-attributes;
} // ipv4-rp
list ipv6-rp {
when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
description
"Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
}
key "rp-address interface-name";
description
"A list of IPv6 RP addresses.";
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"The address of the RP.";
}
leaf interface-name {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"The address of the RP.";
}
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 88]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
leaf df-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"DF address.";
}
uses interface-df-election-state-attributes;
} // ipv6-rp
} // interface-df-election
}
} // augment
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
+ "pim-base:address-family/pim-base:neighbors/"
+ "pim-base:ipv4-neighbor" {
description
"PIM BIDIR augmentation to the IPv4 neighbor state data.";
leaf bidir-capable {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if the neighbor is using the Bidirectional Capable
option in the last Hello message.";
}
} // augment
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
+ "pim-base:address-family/pim-base:neighbors/"
+ "pim-base:ipv6-neighbor" {
description
"PIM BIDIR augmentation to the IPv6 neighbor state data.";
leaf bidir-capable {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if the neighbor is using the Bidirectional Capable
option in the last Hello message.";
}
} // augment
}
<CODE ENDS>
7. Implementation Status
This section to be removed by the RFC editor.
This section records the status of known implementations of the
protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 89]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in [RFC7942].
The description of implementations in this section is intended to
assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to
RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual implementation
here does not imply endorsement by the IETF. Furthermore, no effort
has been spent to verify the information presented here that was
supplied by IETF contributors. This is not intended as, and must not
be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their
features. Readers are advised to note that other implementations may
exist.
According to RFC 7942, "this will allow reviewers and working groups
to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of
running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation
and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature.
It is up to the individual working groups to use this information as
they see fit".
This document is the work result of the PIM working group's YANG
multicast design team. The following wiki page contains the
information on the design team members, the meeting discussions,
lists of modeled features, and which features are supported by which
existing implementations:
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/pim/wiki/yang
8. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC5246].
The NETCONF access control model [RFC6536] provides the means to
restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a
preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol
operations and content.
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes
and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 90]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
pim-base:graceful-restart
This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM graceful
restart at the global level on a device. Modifying the
configuration can cause temporary interruption to the multicast
routing during restart.
pim-base:address-family/pim-base:graceful-restart
This subtree specifies the per address family configuration for
the PIM graceful restart on a device. Modifying the configuration
can cause temporary interruption to the multicast routing during
restart.
pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:pim-rp:rp
This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM Rendezvous
Point (RP) on a device. Modifying the configuration can cause RP
malfunctions.
pim-base:address-family/pim-sm:sm
This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM) on a device. Modifying the configuration can cause
multicast traffic disabled or rerouted in PIM-SM.
pim-base:address-family/pim-dm:dm
This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM Dense Mode
(PIM-DM) on a device. Modifying the configuration can cause
multicast traffic disabled or rerouted in PIM-DM.
pim-base:address-family/pim-bidir:bidir
This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM Bidirectional
Mode (PIM-BIDIR) on a device. Modifying the configuration can
cause multicast traffic disabled or rerouted in PIM-BIDIR.
pim-base:interfaces
This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM interfaces on
a device. Modifying the configuration can cause the PIM protocol
to get insufficient or incorrect information.
These subtrees are all nnder /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/
pim-base:pim.
Unauthorized access to any data node of these subtrees can adversely
affect the multicast routing subsystem of both the local device and
the network. This may lead to network malfunctions, delivery of
packets to inappropriate destinations, and other problems.
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 91]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data
nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
Unauthorized access to any data node of the above subtree can
disclose the operational state information of PIM on this device.
9. IANA Considerations
RFC Ed.: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX' with the
actual RFC number (and remove this note).
This document registers the following namespace URIs in the IETF XML
registry [RFC3688]:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-base
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-bidir
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-dm
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-rp
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-sm
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This document registers the following YANG modules in the YANG Module
Names registry [RFC7950]:
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 92]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
--------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-pim-base
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-base
prefix: pim-base
reference: RFC XXXX
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-pim-bidir
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-bidir
prefix: pim-bidir
reference: RFC XXXX
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-pim-dm
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-dm
prefix: pim-dm
reference: RFC XXXX
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-pim-rp
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-rp
prefix: pim-rp
reference: RFC XXXX
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-pim-sm
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-sm
prefix: pim-sm
reference: RFC XXXX
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Steve Baillargeon, Guo Feng, Robert
Kebler, Tanmoy Kundu, and Stig Venaas for their valuable
contributions.
11. References
11.1. Normative References
[RFC3569] Bhattacharyya, S., Ed., "An Overview of Source-Specific
Multicast (SSM)", RFC 3569, DOI 10.17487/RFC3569, July
2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3569>.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 93]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC3973] Adams, A., Nicholas, J., and W. Siadak, "Protocol
Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol
Specification (Revised)", RFC 3973, DOI 10.17487/RFC3973,
January 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3973>.
[RFC4607] Holbrook, H. and B. Cain, "Source-Specific Multicast for
IP", RFC 4607, DOI 10.17487/RFC4607, August 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4607>.
[RFC4610] Farinacci, D. and Y. Cai, "Anycast-RP Using Protocol
Independent Multicast (PIM)", RFC 4610,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4610, August 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4610>.
[RFC5015] Handley, M., Kouvelas, I., Speakman, T., and L. Vicisano,
"Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast (BIDIR-
PIM)", RFC 5015, DOI 10.17487/RFC5015, October 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5015>.
[RFC5059] Bhaskar, N., Gall, A., Lingard, J., and S. Venaas,
"Bootstrap Router (BSR) Mechanism for Protocol Independent
Multicast (PIM)", RFC 5059, DOI 10.17487/RFC5059, January
2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5059>.
[RFC5060] Sivaramu, R., Lingard, J., McWalter, D., Joshi, B., and A.
Kessler, "Protocol Independent Multicast MIB", RFC 5060,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5060, January 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5060>.
[RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 94]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
[RFC6536] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model", RFC 6536,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6536, March 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6536>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7761] Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., Kouvelas, I.,
Parekh, R., Zhang, Z., and L. Zheng, "Protocol Independent
Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification
(Revised)", STD 83, RFC 7761, DOI 10.17487/RFC7761, March
2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7761>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8294] Liu, X., Qu, Y., Lindem, A., Hopps, C., and L. Berger,
"Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area", RFC 8294,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8294, December 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8294>.
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
(NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.
[RFC8343] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
Management", RFC 8343, DOI 10.17487/RFC8343, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8343>.
[RFC8349] Lhotka, L., Lindem, A., and Y. Qu, "A YANG Data Model for
Routing Management (NMDA Version)", RFC 8349,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8349, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8349>.
[I-D.ietf-bfd-yang]
Rahman, R., Zheng, L., Jethanandani, M., Networks, J., and
G. Mirsky, "YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding
Detection (BFD)", draft-ietf-bfd-yang-13 (work in
progress), March 2018.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 95]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
11.2. Informative References
[RFC3376] Cain, B., Deering, S., Kouvelas, I., Fenner, B., and A.
Thyagarajan, "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version
3", RFC 3376, DOI 10.17487/RFC3376, October 2002,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3376>.
[RFC3618] Fenner, B., Ed. and D. Meyer, Ed., "Multicast Source
Discovery Protocol (MSDP)", RFC 3618,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3618, October 2003,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3618>.
[RFC3810] Vida, R., Ed. and L. Costa, Ed., "Multicast Listener
Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2) for IPv6", RFC 3810,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3810, June 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3810>.
[RFC5306] Shand, M. and L. Ginsberg, "Restart Signaling for IS-IS",
RFC 5306, DOI 10.17487/RFC5306, October 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5306>.
[RFC5880] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
(BFD)", RFC 5880, DOI 10.17487/RFC5880, June 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5880>.
[RFC6388] Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Minei, I., Ed., Kompella, K., and B.
Thomas, "Label Distribution Protocol Extensions for Point-
to-Multipoint and Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
Paths", RFC 6388, DOI 10.17487/RFC6388, November 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6388>.
[RFC7942] Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running
Code: The Implementation Status Section", BCP 205,
RFC 7942, DOI 10.17487/RFC7942, July 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7942>.
[RFC7951] Lhotka, L., "JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG",
RFC 7951, DOI 10.17487/RFC7951, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7951>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis]
Bierman, A., "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of YANG
Data Model Documents", draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-20
(work in progress), March 2018.
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 96]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
Appendix A. Data Tree Example
This section contains an example of an instance data tree in the JSON
encoding [RFC7951], containing both configuration and state data.
lo0: 2001:db8:0:200::1 (RP address)
| +-------+ |
| | Router| |
eth21 +---+ R2 +---+ eth23
| | (RP) | |
| +-------+ | lo0: 2001:db8:0:300::1
| +-------+ | | +-------+ |
| | Router| | | | Router| |
eth10 +--+ R1 +---+ eth12 eth32 +---+ R3 +--+ eth30
| | | | | | | |
| +-------+ | +-------+ |
+-------+ | | +-------+ | +-------+
| | | | | Router| | | | |
| +--+ +---+ R4 +---+ +-------+ +--+ |
| | | | | | | | Router| | | |
+-------+ | | +-------+ +---+ R5 | | +-------+
Source | | | Receiver
| +-------+
The configuration instance data tree for Router R3 in the above
figure could be as follows:
{
"ietf-interfaces:interfaces": {
"interface": [
{
"name": "lo0",
"description": "R3 loopback interface.",
"type": "iana-if-type:softwareLoopback",
"ietf-ip:ipv6": {
"address": [
{
"ip": "2001:db8:0:300::1",
"prefix-length": 64
}
]
}
},
{
"name": "eth30",
"description": "An interface connected to the receiver.",
"type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
"ietf-ip:ipv6": {
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 97]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
"forwarding": true
}
},
{
"name": "eth32",
"description": "An interface connected to RP (R2).",
"type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
"ietf-ip:ipv6": {
"forwarding": true
}
}
]
},
"ietf-routing:routing": {
"router-id": "203.0.113.3",
"control-plane-protocols": {
"ietf-pim-base:pim": {
"address-family": [
{
"address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
"ietf-pim-rp:rp": {
"static-rp": {
"ipv6-rp": [
{
"rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",
"ietf-pim-sm:sm": {
}
}
]
}
}
}
],
"interfaces": {
"interface": [
{
"name": "lo0",
"address-family": [
{
"address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
"hello-interval": "infinity",
"ietf-pim-sm:sm": {
}
}
]
},
{
"name": "eth30",
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 98]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
"address-family": [
{
"address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
"ietf-pim-sm:sm": {
}
}
]
},
{
"name": "eth32",
"address-family": [
{
"address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
"ietf-pim-sm:sm": {
}
}
]
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
The corresponding operational state data for Router R3 could be as
follows:
{
"ietf-interfaces:interfaces": {
"interface": [
{
"name": "lo0",
"description": "R3 loopback interface.",
"type": "iana-if-type:softwareLoopback",
"phys-address": "00:00:5e:00:53:03",
"oper-status": "up",
"statistics": {
"discontinuity-time": "2018-01-23T12:34:56-05:00"
},
"ietf-ip:ipv6": {
"mtu": 1500,
"address": [
{
"ip": "2001:db8:0:300::1",
"prefix-length": 64,
"origin": "static",
"status": "preferred"
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 99]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
},
{
"ip": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5303",
"prefix-length": 64,
"origin": "link-layer",
"status": "preferred"
}
],
"neighbor": [
]
}
},
{
"name": "eth30",
"description": "An interface connected to the receiver.",
"type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
"phys-address": "00:00:5e:00:53:30",
"oper-status": "up",
"statistics": {
"discontinuity-time": "2018-01-23T12:34:56-05:00"
},
"ietf-ip:ipv6": {
"forwarding": true,
"mtu": 1500,
"address": [
{
"ip": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5330",
"prefix-length": 64,
"origin": "link-layer",
"status": "preferred"
}
],
"neighbor": [
]
}
},
{
"name": "eth32",
"description": "An interface connected to RP (R2).",
"type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
"phys-address": "00:00:5e:00:53:32",
"oper-status": "up",
"statistics": {
"discontinuity-time": "2018-01-23T12:34:56-05:00"
},
"ietf-ip:ipv6": {
"forwarding": true,
"mtu": 1500,
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 100]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
"address": [
{
"ip": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5332",
"prefix-length": 64,
"origin": "link-layer",
"status": "preferred"
}
],
"neighbor": [
{
"ip": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5323",
"link-layer-address": "00:00:5e:00:53:23",
"origin": "dynamic",
"is-router": [null],
"state": "reachable"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"ietf-routing:routing": {
"router-id": "203.0.113.1",
"interfaces": {
"interface": [
"lo0",
"eth30",
"eth32"
]
},
"control-plane-protocols": {
"ietf-pim-base:pim": {
"address-family": [
{
"address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
"statistics": {
"discontinuity-time": "2018-01-23T12:34:56-05:00"
},
"topology-tree-info": {
"ipv6-route": [
{
"group": "ff06::1",
"source-address": "*",
"is-rpt": true,
"expiration": 16,
"incoming-interface": "eth32",
"is-spt": false,
"mode": "pim-asm",
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 101]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
"msdp-learned": false,
"rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",
"rpf-neighbor": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5323",
"up-time": 123400,
"outgoing-interface": [
{
"name": "eth30",
"expiration": 36,
"up-time": 223400,
"jp-state": "join"
}
]
},
{
"group": "ff06::1",
"source-address": "2001:db8:1:1::100",
"is-rpt": false,
"expiration": 8,
"incoming-interface": "eth32",
"is-spt": true,
"mode": "pim-asm",
"msdp-learned": false,
"rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",
"rpf-neighbor": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5323",
"up-time": 5200,
"outgoing-interface": [
{
"name": "eth30",
"expiration": 6,
"up-time": 5600,
"jp-state": "join"
}
]
}
]
},
"ietf-pim-rp:rp": {
"static-rp": {
"ipv6-rp": [
{
"rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",
"ietf-pim-sm:sm": {
}
}
]
},
"rp-list": {
"ipv6-rp": [
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 102]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
{
"rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",
"mode": "ietf-pim-sm:rp-sm",
"info-source-type": "static",
"up-time": 323400,
"expiration": "not-set"
}
]
},
"rp-mappings": {
"ipv6-rp": [
{
"group-range": "ff06::1/128",
"rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",
"up-time": 123400,
"expiration": "36"
}
]
}
}
}
],
"interfaces": {
"interface": [
{
"name": "lo0",
"address-family": [
{
"address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
"hello-interval": "infinity",
"ietf-pim-sm:sm": {
},
"oper-status": "up",
"gen-id": 103689,
"hello-expiration": "infinity",
"ipv6": {
"address": [
"fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5303"
],
"dr-address": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5303"
},
"neighbors": {
"ipv6-neighbor": [
]
}
}
]
},
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 103]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
{
"name": "eth30",
"address-family": [
{
"address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
"ietf-pim-sm:sm": {
},
"oper-status": "up",
"gen-id": 203689,
"hello-expiration": 18,
"ipv6": {
"address": [
"fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5330"
],
"dr-address": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5330"
},
"neighbors": {
"ipv6-neighbor": [
]
}
}
]
},
{
"name": "eth32",
"address-family": [
{
"address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
"ietf-pim-sm:sm": {
},
"oper-status": "up",
"gen-id": 303689,
"hello-expiration": 21,
"ipv6": {
"address": [
"fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5332"
],
"dr-address": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5332"
},
"neighbors": {
"ipv6-neighbor": [
{
"address": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5323",
"expiration": 28,
"dr-priority": 1,
"gen-id": 102,
"lan-prune-delay": {
"present": false
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 104]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
},
"up-time": 323500
}
]
}
}
]
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
Authors' Addresses
Xufeng Liu
Volta Networks
EMail: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com
Pete McAllister
Metaswitch Networks
100 Church Street
Enfield EN2 6BQ
UK
EMail: pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com
Anish Peter
Individual
EMail: anish.ietf@gmail.com
Mahesh Sivakumar
Juniper Networks
1133 Innovation Way
Sunnyvale, California
USA
EMail: sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 105]
Internet-Draft PIM YANG May 2018
Yisong Liu
Huawei Technologies
Huawei Administration Building
Longgang, Guangdong 518129
China
EMail: liuyisong@huawei.com
Fangwei Hu
ZTE Corporation
889 Bibo Road
Shanghai, Shanghai 201203
China
EMail: hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn
Liu, et al. Expires November 20, 2018 [Page 106]
