A YANG data model for Protocol-Independent Multicast (PIM)
draft-ietf-pim-yang-12

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (pim WG)
Last updated 2017-12-15 (latest revision 2017-12-08)
Replaces draft-mcallister-pim-yang
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Proposed Standard
Formats plain text pdf html bibtex
Yang Validation 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Reviews
Additional URLs
- Yang catalog entry for ietf-pim-base@2017-12-08.yang
- Yang catalog entry for ietf-pim-bidir@2017-12-08.yang
- Yang catalog entry for ietf-pim-dm@2017-12-08.yang
- Yang catalog entry for ietf-pim-rp@2017-12-08.yang
- Yang catalog entry for ietf-pim-sm@2017-12-08.yang
- Yang impact analysis for draft-ietf-pim-yang
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Document shepherd Stig Venaas
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2017-03-08)
IESG IESG state In Last Call (ends 2017-12-22)
Consensus Boilerplate Yes
Telechat date On agenda of 2018-01-11 IESG telechat
Responsible AD Alvaro Retana
Send notices to Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
IANA IANA review state IANA OK - Actions Needed
IANA action state None
PIM Working Group                                                 X. Liu
Internet-Draft                                                     Jabil
Intended status: Standards Track                           P. McAllister
Expires: June 11, 2018                               Metaswitch Networks
                                                                A. Peter
                                                              Individual
                                                            M. Sivakumar
                                                           Cisco Systems
                                                                  Y. Liu
                                                     Huawei Technologies
                                                                   F. Hu
                                                         ZTE Corporation
                                                        December 8, 2017

       A YANG data model for Protocol-Independent Multicast (PIM)
                         draft-ietf-pim-yang-12

Abstract

   This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure
   and manage Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) devices.  The model
   covers the PIM protocol configuration, operational state, and event
   notifications data.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on June 11, 2018.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

Liu, et al.               Expires June 11, 2018                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   December 2017

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.2.  Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   2.  Design of Data Model  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     2.1.  Scope of model  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     2.2.  Optional capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     2.3.  Datastore applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     2.4.  Top-level structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     2.5.  Position of address family in hierarchy . . . . . . . . .   7
   3.  Module Structure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.1.  PIM base module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.2.  PIM RP module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     3.3.  PIM-SM module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     3.4.  PIM-DM module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
     3.5.  PIM-BIDIR module  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
   4.  PIM YANG Modules  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     4.1.  PIM base module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     4.2.  PIM RP module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  34
     4.3.  PIM-SM module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  49
     4.4.  PIM-DM module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  54
     4.5.  PIM-BIDIR module  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  56
   5.  Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  63
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  64
   7.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  64
   8.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  66
   9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  66
     9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  66
     9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  68
Show full document text