Internet Engineering Task Force                         J. Schoenwaelder
Internet-Draft                                  Jacobs University Bremen
Intended status: Standards Track                                 T. Tsou
Expires: December 7, 2011                                        C. Zhou
                                                     Huawei Technologies
                                                            June 5, 2011


  Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Options for
                      Network Management Protocols
                     draft-schoenw-opsawg-nm-dhc-02

Abstract

   This document defines new Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4
   and DHCPv6) options providing lists of IP addresses that can be used
   to locate network management services.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on December 7, 2011.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents



Schoenwaelder, et al.   Expires December 7, 2011                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft     DHC Options for Network Management          June 2011


   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the BSD License.


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  DHC Options for SYSLOG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     2.1.  SYSLOG Collector Address Option for DHCPv4 . . . . . . . .  3
     2.2.  SYSLOG Collector Address Option for DHCPv6 . . . . . . . .  4
   3.  DHC Options for SNMP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     3.1.  SNMP Notification Receiver Address Option for DHCPv4 . . .  5
     3.2.  SNMP Notification Receiver Address Option for DHCPv6 . . .  6
   4.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
   5.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   6.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   7.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     7.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     7.2.  Informational References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   Appendix A.  Relationship to the SNMP Configuration MIB Modules  .  9
   Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

























Schoenwaelder, et al.   Expires December 7, 2011                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft     DHC Options for Network Management          June 2011


1.  Introduction

   This document defines new Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4
   [RFC2131] and DHCPv6 [RFC3315]) options providing lists of IP
   addresses that can be used to locate network management services.
   The Dynamic Host Configuration (DHC) options defined in this memo
   address some gaps identified for the automated configuration of large
   IP networks [I-D.ietf-opsawg-automated-network-configuration].

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].


2.  DHC Options for SYSLOG

   The SYSLOG protocol [RFC5424] supports several transport mappings.
   According to RFC 5424, implementations MUST support the TLS/TCP-based
   transport defined in [RFC5425] and they SHOULD also support the UDP-
   based transport defined in [RFC5426] for compatibility with
   traditional SYSLOG.  An optional transport of SYSLOG messages over
   DTLS/DCCP and DTLS/UDP is defined in [RFC6012].

   The DHC options described below provide a list of IPv4 or IPv6
   addresses of SYSLOG collectors in order of preference.  The client
   SHOULD use the addresses sequentially but may be configured to try
   secure and/or congestion aware transports before falling back to
   transports that are not congestion aware or insecure.  As such, the
   client may prefer to select an address providing a secure congestion
   aware transport even if it is listed with lower preference.

2.1.  SYSLOG Collector Address Option for DHCPv4

   This section describes the SYSLOG IPv4 Address Option for DHCPv4.
   The SYSLOG IPv4 Address Option begins with an option code followed by
   a length octet.  The value of the length octet does not include
   itself or the option code.  The option layout is depicted below:

    Code   Len      IPv4 Address 1               IPv4 Address 2
   +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--
   | TBD1|  n  |  a1 |  a2 |  a3 |  a4 |  a1 |  a2 |  ...
   +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--

   The code for the SYSLOG DHCPv4 option is [IANA: TBD1].  The minimum
   length of the option is 4 octets, and the length MUST always be a
   multiple of 4.

   The option MUST NOT be specified by the DHCPv4 client, as it is



Schoenwaelder, et al.   Expires December 7, 2011                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft     DHC Options for Network Management          June 2011


   intended only to be returned from the DHCPv4 server.  If the DHCPv4
   client wants to receive this information from the server, it needs to
   include the number [IANA: TBD1] in the "DHCP Parameter Request List"
   option (55).

   Server addresses SHOULD be listed in order of preference, and the
   client SHOULD use the addresses sequentially but may be configured to
   use addresses in a different order according to some local policy
   (e.g., the client prefers secure and/or congestion aware transports
   as described above).

2.2.  SYSLOG Collector Address Option for DHCPv6

   This section describes the SYSLOG IPv6 Address Option for DHCPv6.
   The SYSLOG IPv6 Address Option begins with an option-code followed by
   the option-len.  The value of the option-len does not include itself
   or the option-code.  The option layout is depicted below:

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |        option-code            |           option-len          |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   |                                                               |
                  IPv6 address of SYSLOG collector                 |
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   :                              ...                              :
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   The option-code of the SYSLOG DHCPv6 option OPTION_SYSLOG_COLLECTOR
   is [IANA: TBD2].  The minimum option-len is 16 octets, and the length
   MUST always be a multiple of 16.

   The option MUST NOT appear in other than the following messages:
   Solicit, Advertise, Request, Renew, Rebind, Information-Request and
   Reply.  The option number for these options MAY appear in the Option
   Request Option (6) in the following messages: Solicit, Request,
   Renew, Rebind, Information-Request and Reconfigure.

   The addresses SHOULD be listed in order of preference, and the client
   SHOULD use the addresses sequentially but may be configured to use
   addresses in a different order according to some local policy (e.g.,
   the client prefers secure and/or congestion aware transports as
   described above).






Schoenwaelder, et al.   Expires December 7, 2011                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft     DHC Options for Network Management          June 2011


3.  DHC Options for SNMP

   The SNMP protocol [RFC3410] supports several transport mappings.  The
   preferred IP-based transport is SNMP over UDP [RFC3417].  An
   experimental transport of SNMP over TCP is defined in [RFC3430].  An
   optional standards-track transport of SNMP over SSH is defined in
   [RFC5592] while optional standards-track transports over TLS and DTLS
   are defined in [RFC5953]

   The DHC options described below provide a list of IPv4 or IPv6
   addresses of SNMP entities hosting Notification Receiver applications
   in order of preference.  The client SHOULD use the addresses
   sequentially but may be configured to try secure and/or congestion
   aware transports before falling back to transports that are not
   congestion aware or insecure.  As such, the client may prefer to
   select an address providing a secure congestion aware transport even
   if it is listed with lower preference.

3.1.  SNMP Notification Receiver Address Option for DHCPv4

   This section describes the SNMP IPv4 Address Option for DHCPv4.  The
   SNMP IPv4 Address Option begins with an option code followed by a
   length octet.  The value of the length octet does not include itself
   or the option code.  The option layout is depicted below:

    Code   Len      IPv4 Address 1               IPv4 Address 2
   +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--
   | TBD3|  n  |  a1 |  a2 |  a3 |  a4 |  a1 |  a2 |  ...
   +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--

   The code for the SNMP notification receiver DHCPv4 option is [IANA:
   TBD3].  The minimum length of the option is 4 octets, and the length
   MUST always be a multiple of 4.

   The option MUST NOT be specified by the DHCPv4 client, as it is
   intended only to be returned from the DHCPv4 server.  If the DHCPv4
   client wants to receive this information from the server, it needs to
   include the number [IANA: TBD3] in the "DHCP Parameter Request List"
   option (55).

   The addresses SHOULD be listed in order of preference, and the client
   SHOULD use the addresses sequentially but may be configured to use
   addresses in a different order according to some local policy (e.g.,
   the client prefers secure and/or congestion aware transports as
   described above).






Schoenwaelder, et al.   Expires December 7, 2011                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft     DHC Options for Network Management          June 2011


3.2.  SNMP Notification Receiver Address Option for DHCPv6

   This section describes the SNMP IPv6 Address Option for DHCPv6.  The
   SNMP IPv6 Address Option begins with an option-code followed by the
   option-len.  The value of the option-len does not include itself or
   the option-code.  The option layout is depicted below:

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |        option-code            |           option-len          |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   |                                                               |
   |           IPv6 address of SNMP notification receiver          |
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   :                              ...                              :
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   The option-code of the SNMP notification receiver DHCPv6 option
   OPTION_SNMP_NOT_RECEIVER is [IANA: TBD4].  The minimum option-len is
   16 octets, and the length MUST always be a multiple of 16.

   The option MUST NOT appear in other than the following messages:
   Solicit, Advertise, Request, Renew, Rebind, Information-Request and
   Reply.  The option number for these options MAY appear in the Option
   Request Option (6) in the following messages: Solicit, Request,
   Renew, Rebind, Information-Request and Reconfigure.

   Server addresses SHOULD be listed in order of preference, and the
   client SHOULD use the addresses sequentially but may be configured to
   use addresses in a different order according to some local policy
   (e.g., the client prefers secure and/or congestion aware transports
   as described above).


4.  Security Considerations

   The security considerations in [RFC2131] and [RFC3315]) apply.  If an
   adversary manages to modify the response from a DHCPv4 or DHCPv6
   server or insert its own response, a node could be led to contact a
   rogue network management server.

   It is recommended to use the DHCPv4 authentication option described
   in [RFC3118] where available.  This will also protect against denial-
   of-service attacks to DHCP servers.  [RFC3118] provides mechanisms
   for both entity authentication and message authentication.




Schoenwaelder, et al.   Expires December 7, 2011                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft     DHC Options for Network Management          June 2011


   In IPv6 networks using DHCPv6, it is recommended that clients use
   authentication of DHCPv6 messages as described in Section 21 of
   [RFC3315].

   In deployments where DHCPv4 or DHCPv6 authentication is not
   available, lower-layer security services may be sufficient to protect
   DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 messages.


5.  IANA Considerations

   IANA is requested to assign [IANA: TBD1] as an option code from the
   "DHCP Option Codes" registry.

   IANA is requested to assign [IANA: TBD2] as an option code from the
   "DHCPv6 Options Codes" registry for OPTION_SYSLOG_COLLECTOR.

   IANA is requested to assign [IANA: TBD3] as an option code from the
   "DHCP Option Codes" registry.

   IANA is requested to assign [IANA: TBD4] as an option code from the
   "DHCPv6 Options Codes" registry for OPTION_SNMP_NOT_RECEIVER.


6.  Acknowledgements

   The authors like to thank Ralf Droms, Ted Lemon and Bernie Volz for
   their helpful comments.


7.  References

7.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC2131]  Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol",
              RFC 2131, March 1997.

   [RFC3118]  Droms, R. and W. Arbaugh, "Authentication for DHCP
              Messages", RFC 3118, June 2001.

   [RFC3315]  Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.,
              and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
              IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003.

   [RFC3413]  Levi, D., Meyer, P., and B. Stewart, "Simple Network



Schoenwaelder, et al.   Expires December 7, 2011                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft     DHC Options for Network Management          June 2011


              Management Protocol (SNMP) Applications", STD 62,
              RFC 3413, December 2002.

   [RFC3417]  Presuhn, R., "Transport Mappings for the Simple Network
              Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3417,
              December 2002.

   [RFC3430]  Schoenwaelder, J., "Simple Network Management Protocol
              Over Transmission Control Protocol Transport Mapping",
              RFC 3430, December 2002.

   [RFC5424]  Gerhards, R., "The Syslog Protocol", RFC 5424, March 2009.

   [RFC5425]  Miao, F., Ma, Y., and J. Salowey, "Transport Layer
              Security (TLS) Transport Mapping for Syslog", RFC 5425,
              March 2009.

   [RFC5426]  Okmianski, A., "Transmission of Syslog Messages over UDP",
              RFC 5426, March 2009.

   [RFC5592]  Harrington, D., Salowey, J., and W. Hardaker, "Secure
              Shell Transport Model for the Simple Network Management
              Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 5592, June 2009.

   [RFC5953]  Hardaker, W., "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport
              Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",
              RFC 5953, August 2010.

   [RFC6012]  Salowey, J., Petch, T., Gerhards, R., and H. Feng,
              "Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Transport
              Mapping for Syslog", RFC 6012, October 2010.

7.2.  Informational References

   [I-D.ietf-opsawg-automated-network-configuration]
              ZOU), T., Schoenwaelder, J., Shi, Y., Taylor, T., and G.
              Yang, "Problem Statement for the Automated Configuration
              of Large IP Networks",
              draft-ietf-opsawg-automated-network-configuration-01 (work
              in progress), May 2011.

   [RFC3410]  Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,
              "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
              Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.







Schoenwaelder, et al.   Expires December 7, 2011                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft     DHC Options for Network Management          June 2011


Appendix A.  Relationship to the SNMP Configuration MIB Modules

   The SNMP notification receiver DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 options provide the
   basic information to setup a target in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB and the
   SNMP-NOTIFICATION-MIB [RFC3413].  After selecting the transport
   (e.g., by probing the availability of possible SNMP transport
   endpoints according to some local policy of preference, a volatile
   entry in the snmpTargetTable can be created as follows (assuming xyz
   is some suitable unique handle for the received DHCP option):

   snmpTargetAddrName            = "dhcp-xyz"         (INDEX)
   snmpTargetAddrTDomain         = snmpUDPDomain
   snmpTargetAddrTAddress        = "a.b.c.d"
   snmpTargetAddrTimeout         = 1500               (DEFVAL)
   snmpTargetAddrRetryCount      = 3                  (DEFVAL)
   snmpTargetAddrTagList         = "dhcp-xyz-tag"
   snmpTargetAddrParams          = "dhcp-xyz-param"
   snmpTargetAddrStorageType     = volatile(2)
   snmpTargetAddrRowStatus       = active(1)

   A matching volatile entry in the snmpNotifyTable can also be easily
   created:

   snmpNotifyName                = "dhcp-xyz"         (INDEX)
   snmpNotifyTag                 = "dhcp-xyz-tag"
   snmpNotifyType                = trap(1)            (DEFVAL)
   snmpNotifyStorageType         = volatile(2)
   snmpNotifyRowStatus           = active(1)

   In addition, an entry in the snmpTargetParamsTable is needed.  Its
   structure for SNMPv3/USM user "joe" is as follows:

   snmpTargetParamsName          = "dhcp-xyz-param"   (INDEX)
   snmpTargetParamsMPModel       = 3                  (SNMPv3)
   snmpTargetParamsSecurityModel = 3                  (USM)
   snmpTargetParamsSecurityName  = "joe"
   snmpTargetParamsSecurityLevel = authNoPriv(2)
   snmpTargetParamsStorageType   = volatile(2)
   snmpTargetParamsRowStatus     = active(1)

   Creating of a suitable entry in the snmpTargetParamsTable requires
   local information.  Depending on the security model, additional
   information will be necessary.

   A decision should be taken whether we assume that a suitable entry
   can dynamically be created following some local policy information or
   whether it is expected that snmpTargetParamsTable entries are pre-
   provisioned and the DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 options carry the name of the



Schoenwaelder, et al.   Expires December 7, 2011                [Page 9]


Internet-Draft     DHC Options for Network Management          June 2011


   snmpTargetParamsName entry to apply.


Authors' Addresses

   Juergen Schoenwaelder
   Jacobs University Bremen
   Campus Ring 1
   Bremen  28759
   Germany

   Email: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de


   Tina Tsou
   Huawei Technologies
   Bantian, Longgang District
   Shenzhen  518129
   P.R. China

   Email: tena@huawei.com


   Cathy Zhou
   Huawei Technologies
   Bantian, Longgang District
   Shenzhen  518129
   P.R. China

   Email: cathyzhou@huawei.com





















Schoenwaelder, et al.   Expires December 7, 2011               [Page 10]