IETF Mobile IP Working Group David B. Johnson
INTERNET-DRAFT Rice University
Charles E. Perkins
Nokia Research Center
Jari Arkko
Ericsson
1 June 2002
Mobility Support in IPv6
<draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6-18.txt>
Status of This Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note
that other groups may also distribute working documents as
Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents, valid for a maximum of six
months, and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This document specifies the operation the IPv6 Internet with mobile
computers. Each mobile node is always identified by its home
address, regardless of its current point of attachment to the
Internet. While situated away from its home, a mobile node is also
associated with a care-of address, which provides information about
the mobile node's current location. IPv6 packets addressed to a
mobile node's home address are transparently routed to its care-of
address. The protocol enables IPv6 nodes to cache the binding of
a mobile node's home address with its care-of address, and to then
send any packets destined for the mobile node directly to it at this
care-of address. To support this operation, Mobile IPv6 defines a
new IPv6 protocol and a new destination option. All IPv6 nodes,
whether mobile or stationary, MUST support communications with mobile
nodes.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page i]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Contents
Status of This Memo i
Abstract i
1. Introduction 1
2. Comparison with Mobile IP for IPv4 2
3. Terminology 3
3.1. General Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2. Mobile IPv6 Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Overview of Mobile IPv6 7
4.1. Basic Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.2. New IPv6 Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.3. New IPv6 Destination Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.4. New IPv6 ICMP Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.5. Conceptual Data Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5. Overview of Mobile IPv6 Security 12
5.1. Binding Updates to Home Agents . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
5.2. Binding Updates to Correspondent Nodes . . . . . . . . . 12
5.2.1. Node Keys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.2.2. Nonces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.2.3. Cookies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5.2.4. Cryptographic Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5.2.5. Return Routability Procedure . . . . . . . . . . 14
5.2.6. Applying Return Routability for Correspondent
Bindings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.2.7. Updating Node Keys and Nonces . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.2.8. Preventing Replay Attacks . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.3. Payload Packets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
6. New IPv6 Protocols, Message Types, and Destination Option 21
6.1. Mobility Header . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
6.1.1. Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6.1.2. Binding Refresh Request (BRR) Message . . . . . . 23
6.1.3. Home Test Init (HoTI) Message . . . . . . . . . . 24
6.1.4. Care-of Test Init (CoTI) Message . . . . . . . . 26
6.1.5. Home Test (HoT) Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
6.1.6. Care-of Test (CoT) Message . . . . . . . . . . . 28
6.1.7. Binding Update (BU) Message . . . . . . . . . . . 29
6.1.8. Binding Acknowledgement (BA) Message . . . . . . 32
6.1.9. Binding Error (BE) Message . . . . . . . . . . . 34
6.2. Mobility Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
6.2.1. Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page ii]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
6.2.2. Pad1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
6.2.3. PadN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
6.2.4. Unique Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
6.2.5. Alternate Care-of Address . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
6.2.6. Nonce Indices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
6.2.7. Binding Authorization Data . . . . . . . . . . . 39
6.2.8. Binding Refresh Advice . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
6.3. Home Address Destination Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
6.4. Routing Header type 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.4.1. Routing Header Packet format . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.5. ICMP Home Agent Address Discovery Request Message . . . . 43
6.6. ICMP Home Agent Address Discovery Reply Message . . . . . 45
6.7. ICMP Mobile Prefix Solicitation Message Format . . . . . 47
6.8. ICMP Mobile Prefix Advertisement Message Format . . . . . 49
7. Modifications to IPv6 Neighbor Discovery 51
7.1. Modified Router Advertisement Message Format . . . . . . 51
7.2. Modified Prefix Information Option Format . . . . . . . . 52
7.3. New Advertisement Interval Option Format . . . . . . . . 54
7.4. New Home Agent Information Option Format . . . . . . . . 55
7.5. Changes to Sending Router Advertisements . . . . . . . . 57
7.6. Changes to Sending Router Solicitations . . . . . . . . . 58
8. Requirements for Types of IPv6 Nodes 59
8.1. General Requirements for All IPv6 Nodes . . . . . . . . . 59
8.2. Route Optimization Requirements for All IPv6 Nodes . . . 59
8.3. Requirements for All IPv6 Routers . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
8.4. Requirements for IPv6 Home Agents . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
8.5. Requirements for IPv6 Mobile Nodes . . . . . . . . . . . 62
9. Correspondent Node Operation 63
9.1. Conceptual Data Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
9.2. Receiving Packets from a Mobile Node . . . . . . . . . . 64
9.2.1. Processing Mobility Header (MH) Messages . . . . 64
9.2.2. Receiving Packets with Home Address Destination
Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
9.3. Return Routability Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
9.3.1. Receiving Home Test Init Messages . . . . . . . . 66
9.3.2. Receiving Care-of Test Init Messages . . . . . . 66
9.3.3. Sending Home Test Messages . . . . . . . . . . . 67
9.3.4. Sending Care-of Test Messages . . . . . . . . . . 67
9.4. Processing Bindings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
9.4.1. Receiving Binding Updates . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
9.4.2. Requests to Cache a Binding . . . . . . . . . . . 69
9.4.3. Requests to Delete a Binding . . . . . . . . . . 69
9.4.4. Sending Binding Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . 70
9.4.5. Sending Binding Refresh Requests . . . . . . . . 71
9.4.6. Sending Binding Error Messages . . . . . . . . . 71
9.5. Cache Replacement Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
9.6. Sending Packets to a Mobile Node . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
9.7. Receiving ICMP Error Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page iii]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
10. Home Agent Operation 74
10.1. Conceptual Data Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
10.2. Primary Care-of Address Registration . . . . . . . . . . 75
10.3. Primary Care-of Address De-Registration . . . . . . . . . 79
10.4. Intercepting Packets for a Mobile Node . . . . . . . . . 80
10.5. Tunneling Intercepted Packets to a Mobile Node . . . . . 81
10.6. Handling Reverse Tunneled Packets from a Mobile Node . . 83
10.7. Protecting Return Routability Packets . . . . . . . . . . 83
10.8. Receiving Router Advertisement Messages . . . . . . . . . 84
10.9. Dynamic Home Agent Address Discovery . . . . . . . . . . 85
10.9.1. Aggregate List of Home Network Prefixes . . . . . 87
10.9.2. Scheduling Prefix Deliveries to the Mobile Node . 89
10.9.3. Sending Advertisements to the Mobile Node . . . . 90
10.9.4. Lifetimes for Changed Prefixes . . . . . . . . . 91
11. Mobile Node Operation 91
11.1. Conceptual Data Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
11.2. Packet Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
11.2.1. Sending Packets While Away from Home . . . . . . 93
11.2.2. Interaction with Outbound IPsec Processing . . . 96
11.2.3. Receiving Packets While Away from Home . . . . . 97
11.2.4. Routing Multicast Packets . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
11.3. Home Agent and Prefix Management . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
11.3.1. Receiving Local Router Advertisement Messages . . 100
11.3.2. Dynamic Home Agent Address Discovery . . . . . . 101
11.3.3. Sending Mobile Prefix Solicitations . . . . . . . 102
11.3.4. Receiving Mobile Prefix Advertisements . . . . . 103
11.4. Movement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
11.4.1. Movement Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
11.4.2. Forming New Care-of Addresses . . . . . . . . . . 107
11.4.3. Using Multiple Care-of Addresses . . . . . . . . 108
11.5. Return Routability Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
11.5.1. Sending Home and Care-of Test Init Messages . . . 109
11.5.2. Receiving Return Routability Messages . . . . . . 109
11.5.3. Retransmitting in the Return Routability Procedure 111
11.5.4. Rate Limiting for Return Routability Procedure . 111
11.6. Processing Bindings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
11.6.1. Sending Binding Updates to the Home Agent . . . . 111
11.6.2. Correspondent Binding Procedure . . . . . . . . . 114
11.6.3. Receiving Binding Acknowledgements . . . . . . . 117
11.6.4. Receiving Binding Refresh Requests . . . . . . . 118
11.6.5. Receiving Binding Error Messages . . . . . . . . 119
11.6.6. Forwarding from a Previous Care-of Address . . . 120
11.6.7. Returning Home . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
11.6.8. Retransmitting Binding Updates . . . . . . . . . 123
11.6.9. Rate Limiting Binding Updates . . . . . . . . . . 124
11.7. Receiving ICMP Error Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
12. Protocol Constants 125
13. IANA Considerations 126
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page iv]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
14. Security Considerations 127
14.1. Threats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
14.2. Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
14.3. Binding Updates to Home Agent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
14.4. Binding Updates to Correspondent Nodes . . . . . . . . . 132
14.4.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
14.4.2. Offered Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
14.4.3. Comparison to Regular IPv6 Communications . . . . 133
14.4.4. Return Routability Replays . . . . . . . . . . . 135
14.4.5. Return Routability Denial-of-Service . . . . . . 135
14.5. Tunneling via the Home Agent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
14.6. Home Address Destination Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
14.7. Type 2 Routing Header . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
Acknowledgements 138
References 140
A. State Machine for the Correspondent Binding Procedure 142
A.1. Main State Machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
A.2. Return Routability Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
B. Changes from Previous Version of the Draft 153
C. Future Extensions 154
C.1. Piggybacking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
C.2. Triangular Routing and Unverified Home Addresses . . . . 154
C.3. New Authorization Methods beyond Return Routability . . . 155
C.4. Security and Dynamically Generated Home Addresses . . . . 155
C.5. Remote Home Address Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
Chairs' Addresses 157
Authors' Addresses 157
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page v]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
1. Introduction
This document specifies how the IPv6 Internet operates with mobile
computers. Without specific support for mobility in IPv6 [11],
packets destined to a mobile node would not be able to reach it while
the mobile node is away from its home link. In order to continue
communication in spite of its movement, a mobile node could change
its IP address each time it moves to a new link, but the mobile
node would then not be able to maintain transport and higher-layer
connections when it changes location. Mobility support in IPv6 is
particularly important, as mobile computers are likely to account for
a majority or at least a substantial fraction of the population of
the Internet during the lifetime of IPv6.
The protocol defined in this document, known as Mobile IPv6, allows
a mobile node to move from one link to another without changing the
mobile node's IP address. A mobile node is always addressable by
its "home address", an IP address assigned to the mobile node within
its home subnet prefix on its home link. Packets may be routed to
the mobile node using this address regardless of the mobile node's
current point of attachment to the Internet. The mobile node may
also continue to communicate with other nodes (stationary or mobile)
after moving to a new link. The movement of a mobile node away from
its home link is thus transparent to transport and higher-layer
protocols and applications.
The Mobile IPv6 protocol is just as suitable for mobility across
homogeneous media as for mobility across heterogeneous media. For
example, Mobile IPv6 facilitates node movement from one Ethernet
segment to another as well as it facilitates node movement from an
Ethernet segment to a wireless LAN cell, with the mobile node's IP
address remaining unchanged in spite of such movement.
One can think of the Mobile IPv6 protocol as solving the
network-layer mobility management problem. Some mobility management
applications -- for example, handover among wireless transceivers,
each of which covers only a very small geographic area -- have been
solved using link-layer techniques. For example, in many current
wireless LAN products, link-layer mobility mechanisms allow a
"handover" of a mobile node from one cell to another, reestablishing
link-layer connectivity to the node in each new location.
Mobile IP does not attempt to solve all general problems related to
the use of mobile computers or wireless networks. In particular,
this protocol does not attempt to solve:
- Handling links with partial reachability, or unidirectional
connectivity, such as are often found in wireless networks (but
see Section 11.4.1).
- Access control on a link being visited by a mobile node.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- Local or hierarchical forms of mobility management (similar to
many current link-layer mobility management solutions).
- Assistance for adaptive applications
- Mobile routers
- Service Discovery
- Distinguishing between packets lost due to bit errors vs.
network congestion
2. Comparison with Mobile IP for IPv4
The design of Mobile IP support in IPv6 (Mobile IPv6) represents a
natural combination of the experiences gained from the development of
Mobile IP support in IPv4 (Mobile IPv4) [20, 21, 22], together with
the opportunities provided by IPv6. Mobile IPv6 thus shares many
features with Mobile IPv4, but is integrated into IP and provides
many improvements. This section summarizes the major differences
between Mobile IPv4 and Mobile IPv6:
- There is no longer any need to deploy special routers as
"foreign agents" as are used in Mobile IPv4. In Mobile IPv6,
mobile nodes make use of IPv6 features, to operate in any
location without any special support required from the local
router.
- Support for what is known in Mobile IPv4 as "route
optimization" [23] is now built in as a fundamental part
of the protocol, rather than being added on as an optional set
of extensions that may not be supported by all nodes as in
Mobile IPv4.
- Mobile IPv6 route optimization can operate securely even without
pre-arranged security associations. It is expected that route
optimization can be deployed on a global scale between all mobile
nodes and correspondent nodes.
- Support is also integrated into Mobile IPv6 for allowing route
optimization to coexist efficiently with routers that perform
"ingress filtering" [24]. Both the current care-of address and
the home address can be carried in packets, allowing packets to
pass normally through ingress filtering routers.
- In Mobile IPv6, the mobile node does not have to tunnel multicast
packets to its home agent. The inclusion of the home address in
packets is compatible with multicast routing that is based in
part on the packet's Source Address.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- The movement detection mechanism in Mobile IPv6 provides
bidirectional confirmation of a mobile node's ability to
communicate with its default router in its current location.
- Most packets sent to a mobile node while away from home in
Mobile IPv6 are sent using an IPv6 Routing header rather than IP
encapsulation, reducing the amount of resulting overhead compared
to Mobile IPv4.
- Mobile IPv6 is decoupled from any particular link layer, as it
uses IPv6 Neighbor Discovery [12] instead of ARP. This also
improves the robustness of the protocol.
- The use of IPv6 encapsulation (and the Routing header) removes
the need in Mobile IPv6 to manage "tunnel soft state".
- The dynamic home agent address discovery mechanism in Mobile IPv6
returns a single reply to the mobile node. The directed
broadcast approach used in IPv4 returns separate replies from
each home agent.
3. Terminology
The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [2].
3.1. General Terms
IP Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6).
node A device that implements IP.
router A node that forwards IP packets not explicitly
addressed to itself.
host Any node that is not a router.
link A communication facility or medium over which nodes
can communicate at the link layer, such as an
Ethernet (simple or bridged). A link is the layer
immediately below IP.
interface A node's attachment to a link.
subnet prefix
A bit string that consists of some number of initial
bits of an IP address.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
interface identifier
A number used to identify a node's interface on a
link. The interface identifier is the remaining
low-order bits in the node's IP address after the
subnet prefix.
link-layer address
A link-layer identifier for an interface, such as
IEEE 802 addresses on Ethernet links.
packet An IP header plus payload.
security association
A security object shared between two nodes which
includes the data mutually agreed on for operation
of some cryptographic algorithm (typically including
a key).
security policy database
A database of rules that describe what security
associations should be applied for different kinds
of packets.
destination option Destination options are carried by the IPv6
Destination Options extension header. Mobile IPv6
defines one new destination option, the Home Address
destination option.
3.2. Mobile IPv6 Terms
home address An IP address assigned to a mobile node, used as the
permanent address of the mobile node. This address
is within the mobile node's home link. Standard IP
routing mechanisms will deliver packets destined for
a mobile node's home address to its home link.
home subnet prefix
The IP subnet prefix corresponding to a mobile
node's home address.
home link The link on which a mobile node's home subnet prefix
is defined.
mobile node A node that can change its point of attachment from
one link to another, while still being reachable via
its home address.
movement A change in a mobile node's point of attachment to
the Internet such that it is no longer connected to
the same link as it was previously. If a mobile
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
node is not currently attached to its home link, the
mobile node is said to be "away from home".
correspondent node
A peer node with which a mobile node is
communicating. The correspondent node may be either
mobile or stationary.
foreign subnet prefix
Any IP subnet prefix other than the mobile node's
home subnet prefix.
foreign link Any link other than the mobile node's home link.
care-of address
An IP address associated with a mobile node while
visiting a foreign link; the subnet prefix of this
IP address is a foreign subnet prefix. Among the
multiple care-of addresses that a mobile node may
have at any given time (e.g., with different subnet
prefixes), the one registered with the mobile node's
home agent is called its "primary" care-of address.
home agent A router on a mobile node's home link with which
the mobile node has registered its current care-of
address. While the mobile node is away from home,
the home agent intercepts packets on the home
link destined to the mobile node's home address,
encapsulates them, and tunnels them to the mobile
node's registered care-of address.
binding The association of the home address of a mobile node
with a care-of address for that mobile node, along
with the remaining lifetime of that association.
binding procedure
A binding procedure is initiated by the mobile node
to inform either a correspondent node or the mobile
node's home agent of the current binding of the
mobile node.
binding authorization
Binding procedure needs to be authorized to allow
the recipient to believe that the sender has the
right to specify a new binding.
return routability procedure
The return routability procedure authorizes binding
procedures by the use of a cryptographic cookie
exchange.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
correspondent binding procedure
A return routability procedure followed by a
binding procedure, run between the mobile node and a
correspondent node.
home binding procedure
A binding procedure between the mobile node and its
home agent, authorized by the use of IPsec.
nonce Nonces are random numbers used internally by the
correspondent node in the creation of cookies
related to the return routability procedure. The
nonces are not specific to a mobile node, and are
kept secret within the correspondent node, only used
as one input in the creation of the cookies.
cookie Cookies are numbers that are used by mobile nodes
and correspondent nodes in the return routability
procedure.
care-of cookie
A cookie sent directly to the mobile node's claimed
care-of address from the correspondent node.
home cookie A cookie sent to the mobile node's claimed home
address from the correspondent node.
mobile cookie
A cookie sent to the correspondent node from the
mobile node, and later returned to the mobile node.
Mobile cookies are produced randomly. There are two
kinds of mobile cookies: the HoT cookie and the CoT
cookie.
CoT cookie
A cookie sent by the mobile node to the the
correspondent node in the CoTI message, to be
returned to the mobile node in the CoT message.
HoT cookie
A cookie sent by the mobile node to the the
correspondent node in the HoTI message, to be
returned to the mobile node in the HoT message.
nonce index
The mobile node uses a particular set of cookies in
the return routability procedure. The cookies have
been produced using a particular set of nonces. A
nonce index is used to indicate which nonces have
been used, without revealing the nonces themselves.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 6]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
binding key
a key used for authenticating binding cache
management messages.
binding security association
a security association established specifically
for the purpose of producing and verifying
authentication data passed with a Binding
Authorization Data option.
4. Overview of Mobile IPv6
4.1. Basic Operation
A mobile node is always addressable at its home address, whether it
is currently attached to its home link or is away from home. While
a mobile node is at home, packets addressed to its home address
are routed to it using conventional Internet routing mechanisms in
the same way as if the node were stationary. The subnet prefix of
a mobile node's home address is one of the subnet prefixes of the
mobile node's home link. Packets addressed to the mobile node will
therefore be routed to its home link.
While a mobile node is attached to some foreign link away from home,
it is also addressable at one or more care-of addresses. A care-of
address is an IP address associated with a mobile node while visiting
a particular foreign link. The subnet prefix of a mobile node's
care-of address is one of the subnet prefixes on the foreign link.
As long as the mobile node stays in this location, packets addressed
to this care-of address will be routed to the mobile node.
The association between a mobile node's home address and care-of
address is known as a "binding" for the mobile node. A mobile node
typically acquires its care-of address through stateless [13] or
stateful (e.g., DHCPv6 [25]) Address Autoconfiguration, according
to the methods of IPv6 Neighbor Discovery [12]. Other methods
of acquiring a care-of address are also possible, but are beyond
the scope of this document. The operation of the mobile node is
specified in Section 11.
While away from home, a mobile node registers one of its care-of
addresses with a router on its home link, requesting this router to
function as the "home agent" for the mobile node. The mobile node
performs this binding registration by sending a "Binding Update"
message to the home agent. The home agent replies to the mobile
node by returning a "Binding Acknowledgement" message. The care-of
address associated with this binding registration is known as the
mobile node's "primary care-of address". The mobile node's home
agent thereafter uses proxy Neighbor Discovery to intercept any
IPv6 packets addressed to the mobile node's home address (or home
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 7]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
addresses) on the home link. Each intercepted packet is tunneled
to the mobile node's primary care-of address. This tunneling
is performed using IPv6 encapsulation [15], with the outer IPv6
header addressed to the mobile node's primary care-of address. The
operation of the home agent is specified in Section 10.
Any node communicating with a mobile node is referred to in this
document as a "correspondent node" of the mobile node, and may itself
be either a stationary node or a mobile node. The operation of the
correspondent node is specified in Section 9. Mobile nodes can
inform the correspondent nodes of the current location of the mobile
node. This happens through the correspondent binding procedure. As
a part of this procedure, a return routability test is performed
in order to authorize the establishment of the binding. This is
specified in Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6. When sending a packet to
any IPv6 destination, a node checks its cached bindings for an
entry for the packet's destination address. If a cached binding
for this destination address is found, the node uses a new type of
IPv6 Routing header [11] (see section 6.4) to route the packet to
the mobile node by way of the care-of address indicated in this
binding. If, instead, the sending node has no cached binding for
this destination address, the node sends the packet normally (with
no Routing header), and the packet is subsequently intercepted and
tunneled by the mobile node's home agent as described above. When a
mobile node receives a packet tunneled to it in this manner, it can
use this as an indication that the correspondent node has no binding
for the mobile node. The mobile node can then establish a binding
with the correspondent node.
It is expected that correspondent nodes usually will route packets
directly to the mobile node's care-of address, so that the home agent
is rarely involved with packet transmission to the mobile node. This
is important for scalability and reliability, and for minimizing
overall network load. Routing packets directly to the mobile node's
care-of address also eliminates congestion at the mobile node's home
agent and home link. In addition, the impact of any possible failure
of the home agent, the home link, or intervening networks leading to
or from the home link is reduced, since these nodes and links are not
involved in the delivery of most packets to the mobile node.
Mobile IPv6 defines a new IPv6 destination option. When a mobile
node sends a packet while away from home, it could generally use
a tunnel via the home agent to send this packet. However, if the
correspondent node in question has a binding for this mobile node,
the mobile node can deliver packets directly to the correspondent
node. The mobile node sets the Source Address in the packet's IPv6
header to one of its current care-of addresses, and include a "Home
Address" destination option in the packet, giving the mobile node's
home address. By also including the Home Address destination option
in each packet, the sending mobile node can communicate its home
address to the correspondent node receiving this packet. This makes
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 8]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
the use of the care-of address transparent above the Mobile IPv6
support level (e.g., at the transport layer).
It is possible that while a mobile node is away from home, some nodes
on its home link may be reconfigured. The router that was operating
as the mobile node's home agent can be replaced by a different
router serving the same role. In this case, the mobile node may not
know the IP address of its own home agent. Mobile IPv6 provides a
mechanism, known as "dynamic home agent address discovery", that
allows a mobile node to dynamically discover the IP address of a
home agent on its home link with which it may register its (primary)
care-of address while away from home. The mobile node sends an ICMP
"Home Agent Address Discovery Request" message to the "Mobile IPv6
Home-Agents" anycast address for its own home subnet prefix [16] and
thus reaches one of the routers on its home link currently operating
as a home agent. This home agent then returns an ICMP "Home Agent
Address Discovery Reply" message to the mobile node, including a list
of home agents on the home link. This procedure is specified in
Sections 10.9 and 11.3.2.
When a mobile node arrives to a new link and allocates a new care-of
address, it is desirable for packets arriving at the previous care-of
address to still reach the mobile node. The mobile node may still
accept packets at the previous address, if it is still attached to
the previous link as well as the new one. This is discussed in
Section 11.4.3. If the mobile node is no longer attached to the
previous link, procedures described in Section 11.6.6 may be used to
establish temporary tunneling from the previous link.
4.2. New IPv6 Protocols
Mobile IPv6 defines a new IPv6 protocol, using the Mobility Header
(see Section 6.1). This Header is used to carry the following
messages:
Home Test Init
Home Test
Care-of Test Init
Care-of Test
These four messages are used to initiate the return routability
procedure from the mobile node to a correspondent node. This
ensures authorization of subsequent Binding Updates, as
described in Section 5.2.5. The format of the messages are
defined in Sections 6.1.3 through 6.1.6.
Binding Update
A Binding Update message is used by a mobile node to notify
a correspondent node or the mobile node's home agent of its
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 9]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
current binding. The Binding Update sent to the mobile node's
home agent to register its primary care-of address is marked as
a "home registration". The Binding Update message is described
in detail in Section 6.1.7.
Binding Acknowledgement
A Binding Acknowledgement message is used to acknowledge
receipt of a Binding Update, if an acknowledgement was
requested in the Binding Update. The Binding Acknowledgement
message is described in detail in Section 6.1.8.
Binding Refresh Request
A Binding Refresh Request message is used to request a mobile
node to re-establish its binding with the correspondent node.
This message is typically used when the cached binding is in
active use but the binding's lifetime is close to expiration.
The correspondent node may use, for instance, recent traffic
and open transport layer connections as an indication of active
use. The Binding Refresh Request message is described in
detail in Section 6.1.2.
Binding Error
The Binding Error message is used by the correspondent node to
signal an error related to mobility, such as an inappropriate
attempt to use the Home Address destination option without
an existing binding. This message is described in detail in
Section 6.1.9.
4.3. New IPv6 Destination Options
Mobile IPv6 defines a new IPv6 destination option, the Home
Address destination option. This option is described in detail in
Section 6.3.
4.4. New IPv6 ICMP Messages
Mobile IPv6 also introduces four new ICMP message types, two for use
in the dynamic home agent address discovery mechanism, and two for
renumbering and mobile configuration mechanisms. As discussed in
general in Section 4.1, the following two new ICMP message types are
used for home agent address discovery:
- Home Agent Address Discovery Request, described in Section 6.5.
- Home Agent Address Discovery Reply, described in Section 6.6.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 10]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
The next two message types are used for network renumbering
and address configuration on the mobile node, as described in
Section 10.9.1:
- Mobile Prefix Solicitation, described in Section 6.7.
- Mobile Prefix Advertisement, described in Section Section 10.9.3.
4.5. Conceptual Data Structures
This document describes the Mobile IPv6 protocol in terms of the
following three conceptual data structures:
Binding Cache
A cache, maintained by each IPv6 node, of bindings for other
nodes. A separate Binding Cache is maintained by each IPv6
node for each of its IPv6 addresses. When sending a packet,
the Binding Cache is searched before the Neighbor Discovery
conceptual Destination Cache [12].
The Binding Cache for any one of a node's IPv6 addresses may
contain at most one entry for each mobile node home address.
The contents of all of a node's Binding Cache entries are
cleared when it reboots.
Binding Cache entries are marked either as "home registration"
entries or "correspondent registration" entries. Home
registration entries are deleted when its binding lifetime
expires, while other entries may be replaced at any time
through a local cache replacement policy.
Binding Update List
A list, maintained by each mobile node, recording information
for each Binding Update sent by this mobile node, for which the
Lifetime sent in that Binding Update has not yet expired. The
Binding Update List includes all bindings sent by the mobile
node: those to correspondent nodes, those to the mobile node's
home agent, and those to a home agent on the link on which the
mobile node's previous care-of address is located.
Home Agents List
A list, maintained by each home agent and each mobile node,
recording information about each home agent from which this
node has recently received a Router Advertisement in which the
Home Agent (H) bit is set. This list is similar to the Default
Router List conceptual data structure maintained by each host
for Neighbor Discovery [12].
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 11]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Each home agent maintains a separate Home Agents List for each
link on which it is serving as a home agent; this list is used
by a home agent in the dynamic home agent address discovery
mechanism. Each mobile node, while away from home, also
maintains a Home Agents List, to enable it to notify a home
agent on its previous link when it moves to a new link.
5. Overview of Mobile IPv6 Security
This specification provides a number of security features. These
include the protection of Binding Updates both to home agents and
correspondent nodes, and the protection of tunnels, home address
information, and routing instructions in data packets.
5.1. Binding Updates to Home Agents
Signaling between the mobile node and the home agent requires message
integrity, correct ordering and replay protection.
The mobile node and the home agent must have an security association
to protect this signaling. Authentication Header (AH) or
Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) can be used for integrity
protection. For ESP we require that a non-null authentication
algorithm is applied.
Mobile IPv6 provides its own ordering mechanism inside the Binding
Update and Acknowledgement messages. A sequence number field is
used, as described in Section 6.1.7.
In order to protect messages exchanged between the mobile node and
the home agent with IPsec, appropriate security policy database
entries must be created. We need to avoid the possibility that a
mobile node could use its security association to send a Binding
Update on behalf of another mobile node using the same home agent.
In order to do this, the security policy database entries MUST
unequivocally identify a single SA for any given home address and
home agent. In order for the home address of the mobile node to be
visible when the policy check is made, the mobile node MUST use the
Home Address destination option in Binding Updates sent to the home
agent.
5.2. Binding Updates to Correspondent Nodes
Binding Updates to correspondent nodes can be protected by using data
exchanged during the return routability procedure. We will first
discuss a number of preliminary concepts such as node keys, nonces,
and cookies and the cryptographic functions used. Section 5.2.5
outlines the basic return routability procedure. Section 5.2.6 shows
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 12]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
how the results of this procedure are used to authorize a Binding
Update to a correspondent node. Finally, Sections 5.2.7 and 5.2.8
discuss some additional issues.
5.2.1. Node Keys
Each correspondent node has a secret key, Kcn. The correspondent
node uses this key to verify that the cookies it receives in messages
are those which it has created itself. This key does not need to be
shared with any other entity.
A correspondent node can generate a fresh Kcn each time that it boots
to avoid the need for secure persistent storage for Kcn. Kcn can be
either a fixed value or regularly updated. Procedures for updating
Kcn are discussed later in Section 5.2.7.
Kcn consists of 20 octets.
5.2.2. Nonces
Each correspondent node also generates nonces at regular intervals,
for example every few minutes. The nonces should be generated by
using a random number generator that is known to have good randomness
properties [1]. A correspondent node may use the same Kcn and nonce
with all the mobiles it is in communication with, so that it does not
need to generate and store a new nonce when a new mobile contacts it.
Each nonce is identified by a nonce index. Nonce indices are
16-bit values that are e.g. incremented each time a new nonce is
created. The index value is communicated in the protocol, so that if
a nonce is replaced by new nonce during the run of a protocol, the
correspondent node can distinguish messages that should be checked
against the old nonce from messages that should be checked against
the new nonce. Strictly speaking, indices are not necessary in the
authentication, but allow the correspondent node to efficiently find
the nonce value that it used in creating a cookie.
Correspondent nodes keep both the current nonce and a small set of
old nonces. Older values can be discarded, and messages using them
will be rejected as replays.
The specific nonce index values can not be used by mobile nodes to
determine the validity of the nonce. Expected validity times for
the nonces values and the procedures for updating them are discussed
later in Section 5.2.7.
Nonce is an octet string of any length. The recommended length is
64-bit.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 13]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
5.2.3. Cookies
Three different types of cookies are used in the protocol:
- Two mobile cookies are sent to the correspondent node from the
mobile node, and later returned to the mobile node. The mobile
cookies are produced randomly, and used to verify that the
response matches the request, and to ensure that parties who have
not seen the request can not spoof responses. One of the mobile
cookies is sent in the HoTI message, and returned in the HoT
message. This is called the HoT cookie. The other mobile cookie
is sent in the CoTI message, and returned in the CoT message.
This is called the CoT cookie.
- A home cookie sent to the mobile node from the correspondent node
via the home agent. Home cookies are produced cryptographically
from nonces.
- A care-of cookie is similar to a home cookie, but sent directly
to the mobile node from the correspondent node.
A newly generated random number is typically used for each request
that carries a mobile cookie.
Home and care-of cookies are produced by the correspondent node, and
they are based on the currently active secret keys and nonces of the
correspondent node as well as the home or care-of address. Such a
cookie is valid as long as both the secret key and the nonce used to
create it are valid.
5.2.4. Cryptographic Functions
MAC_K(m) denotes a Message Authentication Code computed on message
m with key K. In this specification, HMAC SHA1 function [26, 19] is
used to compute these codes.
Hash(m) denotes a hash of message m. In this specification, the
function used to compute the hash is SHA1 [19].
5.2.5. Return Routability Procedure
The return routability signaling happens as follows:
Mobile node Home agent Correspondent node
| |
| 1a. |
| Home Test Init(HoTI) |
| Src = home address, |
| Dst = correspondent | |
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 14]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
| Parameters: | |
| - HoT cookie | |
|------------------------->|------------------------->|
| | |
| |
| 1b. |
| Care-of Test Init(CoTI) |
| Src = care-of address |
| Dst = correspondent |
| Parameters: |
| - CoT cookie |
|---------------------------------------------------->|
| |
| 2a. |
| Home Test (HoT) |
| Src = correspondent, |
| Dst = home address |
| Parameters: |
| - HoT cookie |
| | - home cookie |
| | - home nonce index |
|<-------------------------|<-------------------------|
| | |
| |
| 2b. |
| Care-of Test(CoT) |
| Src = correspondent, |
| Dst = care-of address |
| Parameters: |
| - CoT cookie |
| - care-of cookie |
| - care-of nonce index |
|<----------------------------------------------------|
| |
The Home and Care-of Test Init messages are sent at the same
time. The correspondent node returns the Home and Care-of Test
messages as quickly as possible, and perhaps nearly simultaneously,
requiring very little processing. Those four messages form the
return routability procedure. Due to the nearly simultaneous
message delivery, the return routability procedure completes in about
roundtrip between the mobile node and the correspondent.
1a. Home Test Init
A mobile node sends a Home Test Init message to the
correspondent node to acquire the home cookie. The contents of
the message can be summarized as follows:
Src = home address
Dst = correspondent
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 15]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Parameters:
- HoT cookie
This message conveys the mobile node's home address to the
correspondent node. The mobile node also sends along a 64 bit
HoT cookie that the correspondent node must return later. The
Home Test Init message is reverse tunneled through the home
agent.
1b. Care-of Test Init
The mobile node sends a Care-of Test Init message to the
correspondent node to acquire the care-of cookie. The contents
of this message can be summarized as follows:
Src = care-of address
Dst = correspondent
Parameters:
- CoT cookie
The second message conveys the mobile node's care-of address
to the correspondent node. The mobile node also sends along
a 64 bit CoT cookie that the correspondent node must return
later. The Care-of Test Init message is sent directly to the
correspondent node.
2a. Home Test
This message is sent in response to a Home Test Init message.
The contents of the message are:
Src = correspondent
Dst = home address
Parameters:
- HoT cookie
- home cookie
- home nonce index
When the correspondent node receives the Home Test Init
message, it generates a 64-bit home cookie as follows:
home cookie = First64(MAC_Kcn(home address | nonce))
The home cookie is formed from the first 64 bits of the MAC
result. The message is sent to the mobile node via the home
agent; the protocol relies on the assumption that the route
between the home agent and the mobile node is secure. The home
cookie also acts as a challenge to test that the mobile can
receive messages sent to its home address. Kcn is used in the
production of home cookie in order to allow the correspondent
node to verify that it generated the home and care-of cookies,
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 16]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
without forcing the correspondent node to remember a list of
all cookies it has handed out.
The HoT cookie from the mobile node is returned in the Home
Test message, to ensure that the message comes from a node on
the route between the home agent and the correspondent node.
The home nonce index is delivered to the mobile node to later
allow the correspondent node to efficiently find the nonce
value that it used in creating the home cookie.
2b. Care-of Test
This message is sent in response to a Care-of Test Init
message. The contents of the message are:
Src = correspondent
Dst = care-of address
Parameters:
- CoT cookie
- care-of cookie
- care-of nonce index
The correspondent node also sends a challenge to the mobile's
care-of address. When the correspondent node receives the
Care-of Test Init message, it generates a 64-bit care-of cookie
as follows:
care-of cookie = First64(MAC_Kcn(care-of address | nonce))
The cookie is formed from the first 64 bits of the MAC result.
The cookie is sent directly to the mobile node at its care-of
address. The CoT cookie from the from CoTI message is returne
to ensure that the message comes from a node on the route to
the correspondent node.
The care-of nonce index is provided to identify the nonce used
for the care-of cookie. The home and care-of nonce indices are
often the same in the Home and Care-of Test messages.
When the mobile node has received both the Home and Care-of Test
messages, the return routability procedure is complete. As a result,
the mobile node has the means to prove its authority to send a
Binding Update to the correspondent node. The mobile node hashes
together the challenges to form a 16 octet session key Kbu:
Kbu = Hash(home cookie | care-of cookie)
Note that the correspondent node does not create any state specific
to the mobile node, until it receives the Binding Update from that
mobile node. The correspondent node is unaware of the session
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 17]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
key Kbu, though it can recreate Kbu if it is presented the right
addresses and nonce indices.
5.2.6. Applying Return Routability for Correspondent Bindings
After the above procedure has completed, the mobile node can supply a
Binding Update to the correspondent node. An overview of the binding
procedure is shown below.
Mobile Node Correspondent node
| |
| 1. Binding Update |
| Src = care-of address, Dst = correspondent |
| Parameters: |
| - home address |
| - a MAC |
| - home nonce index |
| - care-of nonce index |
| - sequence number |
| - ... |
|---------------------------------------------------->|
| |
| 2. Binding Acknowledgement |
| (if requested) |
| Src = correspondent, |
| Dst = care-of address |
| Parameters: |
| - sequence number |
| - a MAC |
| - ... |
|<----------------------------------------------------|
| |
Message 1 actually creates a binding, and message 2 is optional. The
correspondent binding procedure consists of the return routability
procedure followed by the messages 1 and 2.
1. Binding Update
The mobile node uses the created session key Kbu to authorize
the Binding Update. The contents of the message are as
follows:
Src = care-of address
Dst = correspondent
Parameters:
- home address
- MAC_Kbu(care-of address | correspondent node address | BU)
- home nonce index
- care-of nonce index
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 18]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- sequence number
- ...
The Binding Update message contains Nonce Index option, so that
the correspondent node knows which home and care-of nonces to
use to recompute the session key. "BU" is the content of the
Binding Update message, excluding (1) the IP header, (2) any
extension headers between the IP header the Mobility Header,
and (3) the Authenticator field inside the Binding Update. The
first 96 bits from the MAC result are used as the Authenticator
field. A sequence number will be used to match an eventual
acknowledgement with this message. The sequence numbers
start from a random value. The three dots represent all the
remaining (not security related) information in the message.
Once the correspondent node has verified the MAC, it can create
a binding cache entry for the mobile.
2. Binding Acknowledgement
The Binding Update is optionally acknowledged by the
correspondent node. The contents of the message are as
follows:
Src = correspondent
Dst = care-of address
Parameters:
- sequence number
- MAC_Kbu(care-of address | correspondent node address | BA)
- ...
The Binding Acknowledgement contains the same sequence number
as the Binding Update did. "BA" is the content of the Binding
Acknowledgement message, excluding (1) the IP header, (2)
any extension headers between the IP header the Mobility
Header, and (3) the Authenticator field inside the Binding
Acknowledgement. The first 96 bits from the MAC result are
used as the Authenticator field. The three dots represent
all the remaining (not security related) information in the
message.
Bindings established with correspondent nodes using the return
routability procedure MUST NOT exceed MAX_RR_BINDING_LIFE seconds.
The value in the Source Address field in the IPv6 header carrying
the Binding Update message is normally also the care-of address
which is used in the binding. However, a different care-of address
MAY be specified by including an Alternate Care-of Address mobility
option in the Binding Update message (see Section 6.2.5). When such
message is sent to the correspondent node and the return routability
procedure is used as the authorization method, the Care-of Test Init
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 19]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
and Care-of Test messages MUST have been performed for the address in
the Alternate Care-of Address option (not the Source Address). The
nonce indices MAC value MUST be based on information gained in this
test.
5.2.7. Updating Node Keys and Nonces
An update of Kcn can be done at the same time as an update of a
nonce, so that the nonce index identifies both the nonce and the key.
Old Kcn values have to be therefore remembered as long as old nonce
values.
Before sending a Binding Update, the mobile node has to wait for both
the Home and Care-of Cookies to arrive. Due to resource limitations,
rapid deletion of bindings, or reboots it can not be guaranteed that
the cookies are still fresh and acceptable when the correspondent
node uses them in the processing of the Binding Update. If the
cookies have become too old, the correspondent node replies with
an an error code in the Binding Acknowledgement. The mobile node
can then retry the return routability procedure. However, it is
recommended that correspondent nodes try to keep these cookies
acceptable as long as possible and SHOULD NOT accept them beyond
MAX_COOKIE_LIFE seconds.
Given that the cookies are normally expected to be usable for
some time, the mobile node MAY use them beyond a single run of the
return routability procedure. A fast moving mobile node may reuse
a recent Home Cookie from a correspondent node when moving to a new
location, and just acquire a new Care-of Cookie to show routability
in the new location. While this does not save roundtrips due to the
parallel nature of the home and care-of return routability tests, the
roundtrip through the home agent may be longer, and consequently this
optimization is often useful. A mobile node that has multiple home
addresses, may also use the same Care-of Cookie for Binding Updates
concerning all of these addresses.
5.2.8. Preventing Replay Attacks
The return routability procedure also protects the participants
against replayed Binding Updates through the use of the sequence
number and a MAC. Care must be taken when removing bindings at
the correspondent node, however. Correspondent nodes must retain
bindings and the associated sequence number information at least as
long as the nonces used in the authorization of the binding are still
valid. The correspondent node can, for instance, change the nonce
often enough to ensure that the nonces used when removed entries
were created are no longer valid. If many such deletions occur
the correspondent node can batch them together to avoid having to
increment the nonce index too often.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 20]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
5.3. Payload Packets
Payload packets exchanged with mobile nodes can be protected in the
usual manner, in the same way as stationary hosts can protect them.
However, Mobile IPv6 introduces the Home Address destination option,
a Routing Header, and tunneling headers in the payload packets. In
the following we define the security measures taken to protect these,
and to prevent their use in attacks against other parties.
This specification limits the use of the Home Address destination
option to the situation where the correspondent node already has a
binding cache entry for the given home address. This avoids the use
of the Home Address option in attacks described in Section 14.1. We
also allow the option to be used when the packet containing it has
been protected by IPsec.
Mobile IPv6 uses a Mobile IPv6 specific type of a Routing Header.
This type provides the necessary functionality but does not open
vulnerabilities discussed in Section 14.1.
Tunnels between the mobile node and the home agent are protected by
ensuring proper use of source addresses, and optional cryptographic
protection. The mobile node verifies that the outer IP address
corresponds to its home agent. The home agent verifies that the
outer IP address corresponds to the current location of the mobile
node (Binding Updates sent to the home agents are secure). These
measures protect the tunnels against vulnerabilities discussed in
Section 14.1.
For tunneled traffic to and from the mobile node, encapsulating
the traffic inside IPsec AH or ESP offers an optional mechanism to
protect the integrity and confidentiality of the traffic against
on-path attackers.
6. New IPv6 Protocols, Message Types, and Destination Option
6.1. Mobility Header
The Mobility Header is used by mobile nodes, correspondent nodes, and
home agents in all messaging related to the creation and management
of bindings. Sections 6.1.2 through 6.1.9 describe the message types
used in this protocol. These sections also define which addresses to
use in the IPv6 header in these messages.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 21]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
6.1.1. Format
The Mobility Header is identified by a Next Header value of TBD in
the immediately preceding header, and has the following format:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Payload Proto | Header Len | MH Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Checksum | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| |
. .
. Message Data .
. .
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Payload Proto
8-bit selector. Identifies the type of header immediately
following the Mobility Header. Uses the same values as the
IPv6 Next Header field [11].
This field is intended to be used by a future specification
of piggybacking binding messages on payload packets (see
Section C.1).
Implementations conforming to this specification SHOULD set the
payload protocol type to NO_NXTHDR (59 decimal).
Header Len
8-bit unsigned integer. Length of the Mobility Header in units
of 8 octets, including the the Payload Proto, MH Type, Header
Len, Checksum, and Message Data fields.
We require that the Mobility Header length is a multiple of 8
octets.
MH Type
16-bit selector. Identifies the particular mobility message
in question. Current values are specified in Sections 6.1.2
to 6.1.9. An unrecognized MH Type field causes an error to be
sent to the source.
Checksum
16-bit unsigned integer. This field contains the checksum of
the Mobility Header. The checksum is calculated from the octet
string consisting of a "pseudo-header" followed by the entire
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 22]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Mobility Header starting with the Payload Proto field. The
checksum is the 16-bit one's complement of the one's complement
sum of this string.
The pseudo-header contains IPv6 header fields, as specified
in Section 8.1 of [11]. The Next Header value used in the
pseudo-header is TBD. The addresses used in the pseudo-header
are the addresses that appear in the Source and Destination
Address fields in the IPv6 packet carrying the Mobility Header.
For computing the checksum, the checksum field is set to zero.
Message Data
A variable length field containing the data specific to the
indicated Mobility Header type.
Mobile IPv6 also defines a number of "mobility options" for use
within these messages; if included, any options MUST appear after
the fixed portion of the message data specified in this document.
The presence of such options will be indicated by the Header Len
field within the message. When the Header Len is greater than the
length required for the message specified here, the remaining octets
are interpreted as mobility options. These options include padding
options that can be used to ensure that other options are aligned
properly, and that the total length of the message is divisible by
8. The encoding and format of defined options are described in
Section 6.2.
Alignment requirements for the Mobility Header are the same as for
any IPv6 protocol Header. That is, they MUST be aligned on an
8-octet boundary.
6.1.2. Binding Refresh Request (BRR) Message
The Binding Refresh Request (BRR) message is used to request a
mobile node's binding from the mobile node. It is sent according
to the rules in Section 9.4.5. When a mobile node receives a
packet containing a Binding Refresh Request message and there
already exists a Binding Update List entry for the source of the
Binding Refresh Request, it MAY start a return routability procedure
(see Section 5.2) if it believes the amount of traffic with the
correspondent justifies the use of route optimization. Note that
the mobile node SHOULD NOT respond to Binding Refresh Requests from
previously unknown correspondent nodes due to Denial-of-Service
concerns.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 23]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
The Binding Refresh Request message uses the MH Type value 0. When
this value is indicated in the MH Type field, the format of the
Message Data field in the Mobility Header is as follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
. .
. Mobility options .
. .
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Reserved
16-bit field reserved for future use. The value MUST be
initialized to zero by the sender, and MUST be ignored by the
receiver.
Mobility options
Variable-length field of such length that the complete Mobility
Header is an integer multiple of 8 octets long. Contains one
or more TLV-encoded mobility options. The encoding and format
of defined options are described in Section 6.2. The receiver
MUST ignore and skip any options which it does not understand.
There MAY be additional information, associated with this
Binding Refresh Request message, that need not be present in
all Binding Requests sent. This use of mobility options also
allows for future extensions to the format of the Binding
Refresh Request message to be defined. The following options
are valid in a Binding Refresh Request message:
- Unique Identifier Option
- Binding Authorization option
If no actual options are present in this message, no padding is
necessary and the Header Length field will be set to 1.
6.1.3. Home Test Init (HoTI) Message
A mobile node uses the Home Test Init (HoTI) message to initiate
the return routability procedure and request a home cookie from a
correspondent node (see Section 11.5.1). The Home Test Init message
uses the MH Type value 1. When this value is indicated in the MH
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 24]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Type field, the format of the Message Data field in the Mobility
Header is as follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ HoT cookie +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
. .
. Mobility Options .
. .
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Reserved
16-bit field reserved for future use. This value MUST be
initialized to zero by the sender, and MUST be ignored by the
receiver.
HoT cookie
64-bit field which contains a random value, the HoT cookie.
Mobility options
Variable-length field of such length that the complete Mobility
Header is an integer multiple of 8 octets long. Contains
one or more TLV-encoded mobility options. The receiver MUST
ignore and skip any options which it does not understand. This
specification does not define any options valid for the Home
Test Init message.
If no actual options are present in this message, no padding is
necessary and the Header Length field will be set to 2.
This message is sent with the Source Address set to the home
address of the mobile node, and the Destination Address set to the
correspondent node's address. The message is tunneled through the
home agent when the mobile node is away from home. Such tunneling
SHOULD employ IPsec ESP in tunnel mode between the home agent and
the mobile node. This protection is indicated by the IPsec policy
data base. The protection of Home Test Init messages is unrelated
to the requirement to protect regular payload traffic, which MAY
use such tunnels as well. A packet that includes a Home Test Init
message MUST NOT include a Home Address destination option between
the Mobility Header and the preceding IPv6 header.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 25]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
6.1.4. Care-of Test Init (CoTI) Message
A mobile node uses the Care-of Test Init (CoTI) message to initiate
the return routability procedure and request a care-of cookie from
a correspondent node (see Section 11.5.1). The Care-of Test Init
message uses the MH Type value 2. When this value is indicated
in the MH Type field, the format of the Message Data field in the
Mobility Header is as follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ CoT cookie +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
. .
. Mobility Options .
. .
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Reserved
16-bit field reserved for future use. The value MUST be
initialized to zero by the sender, and MUST be ignored by the
receiver.
CoT cookie
64-bit field which contains a random value, the CoT cookie.
Mobility options
Variable-length field of such length that the complete Mobility
Header is an integer multiple of 8 octets long. Contains
one or more TLV-encoded mobility options. The receiver MUST
ignore and skip any options which it does not understand. This
specification does not define any options valid for the Care-of
Test Init message.
If no actual options are present in this message, no padding is
necessary and the Header Length field will be set to 2.
This message is always sent with the Source Address set to the
care-of address of the mobile node, and is sent directly to the
correspondent node. A packet that includes a Care-of Test Init
message MUST NOT include a Home Address destination option between
the Mobility Header and the preceding IPv6 header.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 26]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
6.1.5. Home Test (HoT) Message
The Home Test (HoT) message is a response to the HoTI message,
and is sent from the correspondent node to the mobile node (see
Section 5.2.5). The Home Test message uses the MH Type value 3.
When this value is indicated in the MH Type field, the format of the
Message Data field in the Mobility Header is as follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Home Nonce Index |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ HoT cookie +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Home Cookie +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
. .
. Mobility options .
. .
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Home Nonce Index
This field will be echoed back by the mobile node to the
correspondent node in a subsequent binding update.
HoT cookie
64-bit field which contains the HoT cookie.
Home Cookie
This field contains the 64 bit home cookie in the return
routability procedure; it is the first of two cookies which
are to be processed to form a key which is then used to
authenticate a binding update.
Mobility options
Variable-length field of such length that the complete Mobility
Header is an integer multiple of 8 octets long. Contains
one or more TLV-encoded mobility options. The receiver MUST
ignore and skip any options which it does not understand. This
specification does not define any options valid for the Home
Test message.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 27]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
If no actual options are present in this message, no padding is
necessary and the Header Length field will be set to 3. This
message is always sent with the Destination Address set to the home
address of the mobile node, Source Address set to the address of the
correspondent node, and is tunneled through the home agent when the
mobile node is away from home. Note that the Home Test message is
always sent to the home address of the mobile node, even when there
is an existing binding for the mobile node. The tunneling between
the home agent and the mobile node SHOULD employ IPsec ESP in tunnel
mode. This protection is indicated by the IPsec policy data base.
6.1.6. Care-of Test (CoT) Message
The Care-of Test (CoT) message is a response to the CoTI message,
and is sent from the correspondent node to the mobile node (see
Section 11.5.2). The Care-of Test message uses the MH Type value 4.
When this value is indicated in the MH Type field, the format of the
Message Data field in the Mobility Header is as follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Care-of Nonce Index |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ CoT cookie +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Care-of Cookie +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
. .
. Mobility Options .
. .
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Reserved
The two 16-bit fields are reserved for future use. These
values MUST be initialized to zero by the sender, and MUST be
ignored by the receiver.
Care-of Nonce Index
This field will be echoed back by the mobile node to the
correspondent node in a subsequent binding update.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 28]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
CoT cookie
64-bit field which contains the CoT cookie.
Care-of Cookie
This field contains the 64 bit care-of cookie in the return
routability procedure; it is the second of two cookies which
are to be processed to form a key which is then used to
authenticate a binding update.
Mobility options
Variable-length field of such length that the complete Mobility
Header is an integer multiple of 8 octets long. Contains
one or more TLV-encoded mobility options. The receiver MUST
ignore and skip any options which it does not understand. This
specification does not define any options valid for the Care-of
Test message.
The CoT message is always sent with the Source Address set to the
address of the correspondent node, and the Destination Address set to
the care-of address of the mobile node; it is sent directly to the
mobile node. If no actual options are present in this message, no
padding is necessary and the Header Len field will be set to 3.
6.1.7. Binding Update (BU) Message
The Binding Update (BU) message is used by a mobile node to notify
other nodes of a new care-of address for itself. A packet containing
a Binding Update message is sent with the Source Address set to the
care-of address of the mobile node and the Destination Address set to
the correspondent node's address.
The Binding Update message uses the MH Type value 5. When this value
is indicated in the MH Type field, the format of the Message Data
field in the Mobility Header is as follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sequence # |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|A|H|S|D|L| Reserved | Lifetime |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
. .
. Mobility options .
. .
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 29]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Acknowledge (A)
The Acknowledge (A) bit is set by the sending mobile node to
request a Binding Acknowledgement (Section 6.1.8) be returned
upon receipt of the Binding Update.
Home Registration (H)
The Home Registration (H) bit is set by the sending mobile
node to request that the receiving node should act as this
node's home agent. The destination of the packet carrying this
message MUST be that of a router sharing the same subnet prefix
as the home address of the mobile node in the binding.
Single Address Only (S)
If the `S' bit is set, the mobile node requests that the home
agent make no changes to any other Binding Cache entry except
for the particular one containing the home address specified
in the Home Address destination option. This disables home
agent processing for other related addresses, as is described
in Section 10.2.
Duplicate Address Detection (D)
The Duplicate Address Detection (D) bit is set by the sending
mobile node to request that the receiving node (the mobile
node's home agent) perform Duplicate Address Detection [13]
on the mobile node's home link for the home address in this
binding. This bit is only valid when the Home Registration (H)
and Acknowledge (A) bits are also set, and MUST NOT be set
otherwise.
Link-Local Address Compatibility (L)
The Link-Local Address Compatibility (L) bit is set when the
home address reported by the mobile node has the same interface
identifier (IID) as the mobile node's link-local address.
Reserved
These fields are unused. They MUST be initialized to zero by
the sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver.
Sequence #
A 16-bit number used by the receiving node to sequence Binding
Updates and by the sending node to match a returned Binding
Acknowledgement with this Binding Update.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 30]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Lifetime
16-bit unsigned integer. The number of time units remaining
before the binding MUST be considered expired. A value of all
one bits (0xffffffff) indicates infinity. A value of zero
indicates that the Binding Cache entry for the mobile node MUST
be deleted. One time unit is 16 seconds.
Mobility options
Variable-length field of such length that the complete Mobility
Header is an integer multiple of 8 octets long. Contains one
or more TLV-encoded mobility options. The encoding and format
of defined options are described in Section 6.2. The receiver
MUST ignore and skip any options which it does not understand.
The following options are valid in a Binding Update message:
- Unique Identifier option
- Binding Authorization Data option
- Nonce Indices option.
- Alternate Care-of Address option
If no actual options are present in this message, no padding is
necessary and the Header Len field will be set to 4.
A Binding Update to the home agent MUST include the Home Address
destination option if the Source Address field in the IPv6 header is
not the home address of the mobile node.
The care-of address MUST NOT be any IPv6 address which is prohibited
for use within a Routing Header; thus multicast addresses, the
unspecified address, loop-back address, and link-local addresses
are excluded. Binding Updates indicating any such excluded care-of
address MUST be silently discarded.
The deletion of a binding can be indicated by setting the Lifetime
field to 0 or by setting the care-of address equal to the home
address. Correspondent nodes SHOULD NOT expire the binding cache
entry before the lifetime expires, if any application hosted by the
correspondent node is still likely to require communication with the
mobile node. A binding cache entry that is deallocated prematurely
might cause subsequent packets to be dropped from the mobile node,
if they contain the Home Address destination option. This situation
is recoverable, since an error message is sent to the mobile node;
however, it causes unnecessary delay in the communications.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 31]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
6.1.8. Binding Acknowledgement (BA) Message
The Binding Acknowledgement message is used to acknowledge receipt
of a Binding Update message (Section 6.1.7). When a node receives
a packet containing a Binding Update message, with this node being
the destination of the packet, this node MUST return a Binding
Acknowledgement to the mobile node, if the Acknowledge (A) bit is
set in the the Binding Update. The Binding Acknowledgement message
is sent to the Source Address of the Binding Update message which
is being acknowledged. The packet includes a Routing header if
the Source Address was not the home address of the mobile node, as
described in Sections 10.2 and 9.4.4. The Source Address of the
Binding Acknowledgement is the Destination Address from the Binding
Update.
The Binding Acknowledgement message has the MH Type value 6. When
this value is indicated in the MH Type field, the format of the
Message Data field in the Mobility Header is as follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Status | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sequence # | Lifetime |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
. .
. Mobility options .
. .
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Reserved
These fields are unused. They MUST be initialized to zero by
the sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver.
Status
8-bit unsigned integer indicating the disposition of the
Binding Update. Values of the Status field less than 128
indicate that the Binding Update was accepted by the receiving
node. Values greater than or equal to 128 indicate that
the Binding Update was rejected by the receiving node. The
following Status values are currently defined:
0 Binding Update accepted
128 Reason unspecified
129 Administratively prohibited
130 Insufficient resources
131 Home registration not supported
132 Not home subnet
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 32]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
133 Not home agent for this mobile node
134 Duplicate Address Detection failed
135 Sequence number out of window
136 Route optimization unnecessary due to low traffic
137 Invalid authenticator
138 Expired Home Nonce Index
139 Expired Care-of Nonce Index
Up-to-date values of the Status field are to be specified in
the IANA registry of assigned numbers [18].
Sequence #
The Sequence Number in the Binding Acknowledgement is copied
from the Sequence Number field in the Binding Update. It used
by the mobile node in matching this Acknowledgement with an
outstanding Binding Update.
Lifetime
The granted lifetime, in time units of 4 seconds, for which
this node SHOULD retain the entry for this mobile node in its
Binding Cache. A value of all one bits (0xffffffff) indicates
infinity.
The value of this field is undefined if the Status field
indicates that the Binding Update was rejected.
Mobility options
Variable-length field of such length that the complete Mobility
Header is an integer multiple of 8 octets long. Contains one
or more TLV-encoded mobility options. The encoding and format
of defined options are described in Section 6.2. The receiver
MUST ignore and skip any options which it does not understand.
There MAY be additional information, associated with this
Binding Acknowledgement message, that need not be present
in all Binding Acknowledgements sent. This use of mobility
options also allows for future extensions to the format of the
Binding Acknowledgement message to be defined. The following
options are valid for the Binding Acknowledgement message:
- Binding Authorization Data option
- Binding Refresh Advice option
If no options are present in this message, 4 bytes of padding is
necessary and the Header Len field will be set to 2.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 33]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
The Binding Acknowledgement is sent to the source address of the
Binding Update message, regardless of whether the Binding Update
succeeded or failed. No Routing Headers are added to the message.
6.1.9. Binding Error (BE) Message
The Binding Error (BE) message is used by the correspondent node to
signal an error related to mobility, such as an inappropriate attempt
to use the Home Address destination option without an existing
binding. A packet containing a Binding Error message is sent to the
source address of the offending packet. For instance, in the case
of the Home Address destination option error, the packet is the one
that contained the Home Address destination option and therefore
the Binding Error message is sent to the care-of address of the
mobile node. The source address of the Binding Error message is the
correspondent node's address.
The Binding Error message uses the MH Type value 7. When this value
is indicated in the MH Type field, the format of the Message Data
field in the Mobility Header is as follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Status | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ +
| |
+ Home Address +
| |
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
. .
. Mobility Options .
. .
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Status
8-bit unsigned integer indicating the reason for this message.
The following such Status values are currently defined:
1 Home Address destination option used without a binding
2 Received message had an unknown value for the MH Type
field
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 34]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Reserved
A 8-bit field reserved for future use. The value MUST be
initialized to zero by the sender, and MUST be ignored by the
receiver.
Home Address
The home address that was contained in the Home Address
destination option. The mobile node uses this information to
determine which binding does not exist, in cases where the
mobile node has several home addresses.
Mobility options
Variable-length field of such length that the complete Mobility
Header is an integer multiple of 8 octets long. Contains one
or more TLV-encoded mobility options. The receiver MUST ignore
and skip any options which it does not understand.
There MAY be additional information, associated with this
Binding Error message, that need not be present in all Binding
Error messages sent. This use of mobility options also allows
for future extensions to the format of the Binding Error
message to be defined. The encoding and format of defined
options are described in Section 6.2. This specification does
not define any options valid for the Binding Error message.
If no actual options are present in this message, no padding is
necessary and the Header Len field will be set to 3.
6.2. Mobility Options
6.2.1. Format
In order to allow optional fields that may not be needed in every use
of any given Mobility Header, and to allow future extensions to the
format of these messages to be defined, the Mobility Header messages
defined in this document can include one or more mobility options.
Such options are included in the data portion of the message itself,
after the fixed portion of the message data specified in the message
subsections of section 6.1.
The presence of such options will be indicated by the Header Len of
the Mobility Header.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 35]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
These options are encoded within the remaining space of the message
data for that message, using a type-length-value (TLV) format as
follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Option Type | Option Len | Option Data...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Option Type
8-bit identifier of the type of mobility option. When
processing a Mobility Header containing an option for which
the Option Type value is not recognized by the receiver,
the receiver MUST quietly ignore and skip over the option,
correctly handling any remaining options in the message.
Option Len
8-bit unsigned integer. Length of this mobility option, in
octets. The Option Len does not include the length of the
Option Type and Option Len fields.
Option Data
A variable length field that contains data specific to the
option.
The following subsections specify the Option types which are
currently defined for use in the Mobility Header.
Implementations MUST silently ignore any mobility options that they
do not understand.
6.2.2. Pad1
The Pad1 option does not have any alignment requirements. Its format
is as follows:
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NOTE! the format of the Pad1 option is a special case -- it has
neither Option Len nor Option Data fields.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 36]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
The Pad1 option is used to insert one octet of padding in the
Mobility Options area of a Mobility Header. If more than one octet
of padding is required, the PadN option, described next, should be
used rather than multiple Pad1 options.
6.2.3. PadN
The PadN option does not have any alignment requirements. Its format
is as follows:
0 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- - - - - - - - -
| 1 | Option Len | Option Data
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- - - - - - - - -
The PadN option is used to insert two or more octets of padding in
the Mobility Options area of a Mobility Header message. For N octets
of padding, the Option Len field contains the value N-2, and the
Option Data consists of N-2 zero-valued octets. Option data MUST be
ignored by the receiver.
6.2.4. Unique Identifier
The Unique Identifier option has the alignment requirement of 2n.
Its format is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type = 2 | Length = 2 | Unique Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Unique Identifier option is valid only in Binding Refresh
Request, and Binding Update messages. The Unique Identifier field
contains a 16-bit value that serves to uniquely identify a Binding
Request among those sent by this Source Address, and to allow the
Binding Update to identify the specific Binding Refresh Request to
which it responds.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 37]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
6.2.5. Alternate Care-of Address
The Alternate Care-of Address option has an alignment requirement of
8n+6. Its format is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type = 3 | Length = 16 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ +
| |
+ Alternate Care-of Address +
| |
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Alternate Care-of Address option is valid only in Binding Update
message. The Alternate Care-of Address field contains an address to
use as the care-of address for the binding, rather than using the
Source Address of the packet as the care-of address.
6.2.6. Nonce Indices
The Nonce Indices option has an alignment requirement of 2n. Its
format is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type = 4 | Length = 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Home Nonce Index | Care-of Nonce Index |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Nonce Indices option is valid only in the Binding Update message,
and only when present together with an Binding Authorization Data
option.
The Home Nonce Index field tells the correspondent node that receives
the message which of the challenge values (Ni) are to be used to
authenticate the Binding Update.
The Care-of Nonce Index field tells the correspondent node that
receives the message which of the challenge values (Nj) are to be
used to authenticate the Binding Update.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 38]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
6.2.7. Binding Authorization Data
The Binding Authorization Data option has an alignment requirement of
4n+2. Its format is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type = 5 | Len |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ +
| Authenticator |
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Binding Authorization Data option is valid only in the Binding
Refresh Request, Binding Update, and Binding Acknowledgment messages.
The Option Len field contains the length of the authenticator in
octets.
The Authenticator field contains a cryptographic value which can be
used to determine that the message in question comes from the right
authority. Rules for calculating this value depend on the used
authorization procedure. This specification gives the rules only for
the return routability procedure. For this procedure, this option
can only appear in a Binding Update message and rules for calculating
the Authenticator value are described in Section 6.1.7.
6.2.8. Binding Refresh Advice
The Binding Refresh Advice option has an alignment requirement of 2n.
Its format is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type = 7 | Length = 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Refresh Interval |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Binding Refresh Advice option is only valid in the Binding
Acknowledgement message, and only on Acknowledgements sent from
the mobile node's home agent in reply to a home registration. The
Refresh Interval is measured in seconds, and indicates how long
before the mobile node SHOULD send a new home registration to the
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 39]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
home agent. The Refresh Interval MUST be set to indicate a smaller
time interval than the Lifetime value of the Binding Acknowledgement.
6.3. Home Address Destination Option
The Home Address destination option is used in a packet sent by a
mobile node while away from home, to inform the recipient of the
mobile node's home address.
Multicast addresses, link-local addresses, loopback addresses, IPv4
mapped addresses, and the unspecified address, MUST NOT be used
within a Home Address option. The Home Address Option MUST NOT
appear more than once in any given packet, except inside the payload
part of the packet if tunneling is involved.
The Home Address option is encoded in type-length-value (TLV) format
as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Option Type | Option Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ +
| |
+ Home Address +
| |
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Option Type
201 = 0xC9
Option Length
8-bit unsigned integer. Length of the option, in octets,
excluding the Option Type and Option Length fields. This field
MUST be set to 16.
Home Address
The home address of the mobile node sending the packet.
IPv6 requires that options appearing in a Hop-by-Hop Options
header or Destination Options header be aligned in a packet so that
multi-octet values within the Option Data field of each option fall
on natural boundaries (i.e., fields of width n octets are placed at
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 40]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
an integer multiple of n octets from the start of the header, for
n = 1, 2, 4, or 8) [11]. The alignment requirement [11] for the Home
Address option is 8n+6.
The three highest-order bits of the Option Type are encoded to
indicate specific processing of the option [11]. For the Home
Address option, these three bits are set to 110, indicating that any
IPv6 node processing this option that does not recognize the Option
Type must discard the packet and, only if the packet's Destination
Address was not a multicast address, return an ICMP Parameter
Problem, Code 2, message to the packet's Source Address; and that the
data within the option cannot change en-route to the packet's final
destination.
A packet MUST NOT contain more than one Home Address option, except
that an encapsulated packet [15] MAY contain a separate Home Address
option associated with each encapsulating IP header.
The Home Address option MUST be placed as follows:
- After the Routing Header, if that header is present
- Before the Fragment Header, if that header is present
- Before the AH Header or ESP Header, if either one of those
headers is present
The inclusion of a Home Address destination option in a packet
affects the receiving node's processing of only this single packet;
no state is created or modified in the receiving node as a result
of receiving a Home Address option in a packet. In particular, the
presence of a Home Address option in a received packet MUST NOT alter
the contents of the receiver's Binding Cache and MUST NOT cause any
changes in the routing of subsequent packets sent by this receiving
node.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 41]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
6.4. Routing Header type 2
Mobile IPv6 uses a Routing header to carry the Home Address for
packets sent from a correspondent node to a mobile node. The Care of
Address of the mobile node is carried in the IPv6 destination field.
The new Routing header uses a different type than defined for
"regular" IPv6 source routing, enabling firewalls to apply different
rules to source routed packets than to MIPv6. This Routing header
type (Type 2) is restricted to carry only one IPv6 address. All IPv6
nodes which process this Routing header MUST verify that the address
contained within is the node's own home address in order to prevent
packets from being forwarded outside the node.
6.4.1. Routing Header Packet format
The Type 2 Routing header has the following format:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Next Header | Hdr Ext Len=2 | Routing Type=2|Segments Left=1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ +
| |
+ Home Address +
| |
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Next Header
8-bit selector. Identifies the type of header immediately
following the Routing header. Uses the same values as the IPv6
Next Header field [11].
Hdr Ext Len
8-bit unsigned integer. Length of the Routing header in
8-octet units, not including the first 8 octets. For the Type
2 Routing header, Hdr Ext Len is always 2.
Routing Type
8-bit unsigned integer that contains the value 2.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 42]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Segments Left
8-bit unsigned integer. Number of route segments remaining;
i.e., number of explicitly listed intermediate nodes still to
be visited before reaching the final destination. Packets
transmitted through an interface have Segments left is always 1
in this type of Routing header.
Reserved
32-bit reserved field. Initialized to zero for transmission,
and ignored on reception.
Home Address
The Home Address of the destination Mobile Node.
The ordering rules for extension headers in an IPv6 packet are
described in Section 4.1 of [11]. The new Routing header (Type 2)
defined for Mobile IPv6 follows the same ordering as other routing
headers. If more than one Routing header (e.g., both a Type 0 and a
Type 2 Routing header are present), the Type 2 Routing header should
follow all other Routing headers. Otherwise the order of routing
headers is independent of their type and follows [11].
In addition, the general procedures defined by IPv6 for Routing
headers suggest that a received Routing header MAY be automatically
"reversed" to construct a Routing header for use in any response
packets sent by upper-layer protocols, if the received packet is
authenticated [6]. This MUST NOT be done automatically for Type 2
Routing headers.
6.5. ICMP Home Agent Address Discovery Request Message
The ICMP Home Agent Address Discovery Request message is used by a
mobile node to initiate the dynamic home agent address discovery
mechanism, as described in Section 11.3.2. The mobile node sends
a Home Agent Address Discovery Request message to the "Mobile IPv6
Home-Agents" anycast address for its own home subnet prefix [16].
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Code | Checksum |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Identifier | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 43]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Type
150 <To Be Assigned by IANA>
Code
0
Checksum
The ICMP checksum [14].
Identifier
An identifier to aid in matching Home Agent Address Discovery
Reply messages to this Home Agent Address Discovery Request
message.
Reserved
This field is unused. It MUST be initialized to zero by the
sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver.
The Source Address of the Home Agent Address Discovery Request
message packet MUST be one of the mobile node's current care-of
addresses. The home agent MUST then return the Home Agent Address
Discovery Reply message directly to the Source Address chosen by the
mobile node. Note that, at the time of performing this dynamic home
agent address discovery, it is likely that the mobile node is not
registered with any home agent within the specified anycast group.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 44]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
6.6. ICMP Home Agent Address Discovery Reply Message
The ICMP Home Agent Address Discovery Reply message is used by a home
agent to respond to a mobile node that uses the dynamic home agent
address discovery mechanism, as described in Section 10.9. One of
the home agents on the home link responds to the mobile node with a
Home Agent Address Discovery Reply message, providing a list of the
routers on the mobile node's home link serving as home agents.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Code | Checksum |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Identifier | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +
| |
+ Reserved +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ +
. .
. Home Agent Addresses .
. .
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
151 <To Be Assigned by IANA>
Code
0
Checksum
The ICMP checksum [14].
Identifier
The identifier from the invoking Home Agent Address Discovery
Request message.
Reserved
This field is unused. It MUST be initialized to zero by the
sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 45]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Home Agent Addresses
A list of addresses of home agents on the home link for the
mobile node. The number of addresses present in the list is
indicated by the remaining length of the IPv6 packet carrying
the Home Agent Address Discovery Reply message.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 46]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
6.7. ICMP Mobile Prefix Solicitation Message Format
The ICMP Mobile Prefix Solicitation Message is sent by a mobile node
to its home agent while it is away from home. The purpose of the
message is to solicit a Mobile Prefix Advertisement from the home
agent, which will allow the mobile node to gather prefix information
about its home network. This information can be used to configure
home address(es) by stateless address autoconfiguration [13],
or update address(es) according to changes in prefix information
supplied by the home agent.
The Mobile Prefix Solicitation is similar to the Router Solicitation
used in Neighbor Discovery [12], except it is routed from the mobile
node on the visited network to the home agent on the home network by
usual unicast routing rules.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Code | Checksum |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Identifier | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IP Fields:
Source Address
The mobile node's care-of address.
Destination Address
The address of the mobile node's home agent. This home agent
must be on the link which the mobile node wishes to learn
prefix information about.
Hop Limit
Set to an initial hop limit value, similarly to any other
unicast packet sent by the mobile node.
Authentication Header
If a Security Association for the IP Authentication Header
exists between the sender and the destination address, then the
sender SHOULD include this header. [subject to change]
ICMP Fields:
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 47]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Type
152 <To Be Assigned by IANA>
Code
0
Checksum
The ICMP checksum [14].
Identifier
An identifier to aid in matching a future Mobile Prefix
Advertisement message to this Mobile Prefix Solicitation
message.
Reserved
This field is unused. It MUST be initialized to zero by the
sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver.
If the mobile node receives a Mobile Prefix Advertisement Message
from its home agent (see section 6.8), and the advertisement does not
contain any authentication data, the mobile node MAY nevertheless
send a Binding Update message to its home agent using its new home
address which has been formed from the newly advertised prefix
information. If there are security concerns that would inhibit
responding to unauthenticated advertisements, then the mobile node
SHOULD send a Mobile Prefix Solicitation message to its home agent,
with a nonzero Identifier value that can be used to match a future
advertisement with the solicitation.
The mobile node SHOULD include authentication data along with any
Mobile Prefix Solicitation message that it sends to the home agent.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 48]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
6.8. ICMP Mobile Prefix Advertisement Message Format
A home agent will send a Mobile Prefix Advertisement message to a
mobile node to distribute prefix information about the home link
while the mobile node is traveling away from the home network. This
will occur in response to a Mobile Prefix Solicitation with an
Advertisement, or by an unsolicited Advertisement sent according to
the rules in Section 10.9.1.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Code | Checksum |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Identifier | Options ...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IP Fields:
Source Address
The home agent's address as the mobile node would
expect to see it (i.e., same network prefix)
Destination Address
If this message is a response to a Mobile Prefix
Solicitation, this field contains the Source Address
field from that packet. For unsolicited messages,
the mobile node's care-of address SHOULD be used.
Note that unsolicited messages can only be sent if
the mobile node is currently registered with the
home agent.
Authentication Header
An AH header MUST be included unless the mobile node
has yet to configure a home address.
ICMP Fields:
Type
153 <To Be Assigned by IANA>
Code
0
Checksum
The ICMP checksum [14].
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 49]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Identifier
An identifier to aid in matching this Mobile Prefix
Advertisement message to a previous Mobile Prefix Solicitation
message.
Options:
Prefix Information
Each message contains one or more Prefix Information options.
Each option carries the prefix(es) that the mobile node
should use to configure its home address(es). Section 10.9.1
describes which prefixes should be advertised to the mobile
node.
The Prefix Information option is defined in Section 4.6.2
of [12], with modifications defined in Section 7.2 of this
specification. The home agent MUST use this modified Prefix
Information option to send the aggregate list of home network
prefixes as defined in Section 10.9.1.
The Mobile Prefix Advertisement sent by the home agent MAY include
the Source Link-layer Address option defined in RFC 2461 [12], or the
Advertisement Interval option specified in Section 7.3.
Future versions of this protocol may define new option types. Mobile
nodes MUST silently ignore any options they do not recognize and
continue processing the message.
If the Advertisement is sent in response to a Mobile Prefix
Solicitation, the home agent MUST copy the Identifier value from that
message into the Identifier field of the Advertisement.
The home agent MUST NOT send more than one Mobile Prefix
Advertisement message per second to any mobile node.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 50]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
7. Modifications to IPv6 Neighbor Discovery
7.1. Modified Router Advertisement Message Format
Mobile IPv6 modifies the format of the Router Advertisement
message [12] by the addition of a single flag bit to indicate that
the router sending the Advertisement message is serving as a home
agent on this link. The format of the Router Advertisement message
is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Code | Checksum |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Cur Hop Limit |M|O|H| Reserved| Router Lifetime |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reachable Time |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Retrans Timer |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Options ...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
This format represents the following changes over that originally
specified for Neighbor Discovery [12]:
Home Agent (H)
The Home Agent (H) bit is set in a Router Advertisement to
indicate that the router sending this Router Advertisement is
also functioning as a Mobile IP home agent on this link.
Reserved
Reduced from a 6-bit field to a 5-bit field to account for the
addition of the Home Agent (H) bit.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 51]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
7.2. Modified Prefix Information Option Format
Mobile IPv6 requires knowledge of a router's global address for two
reasons:
- To allow a home agent (a router) to learn the address of all
other home agents on the link for which it is providing home
agent service, for use in building its Home Agents List as
part of the dynamic home agent address discovery mechanism
(Sections 10.9 and 11.3.2).
- To allow a mobile node to send a Binding Update to a router on
the link on which its previous care-of address is located, for
purposes of establishing forwarding from this previous care-of
address to its new care-of address (Section 11.6.6).
However, Neighbor Discovery [12] only advertises a router's
link-local address, by requiring this address to be used as the IP
Source Address of each Router Advertisement.
Mobile IPv6 extends Neighbor Discovery to allow a router to easily
and efficiently advertise its global address, by the addition of a
single flag bit in the format of a Prefix Information option for
use in Router Advertisement messages. The format of the Prefix
Information option is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | Prefix Length |L|A|R|Reserved1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Valid Lifetime |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Preferred Lifetime |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reserved2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ +
| |
+ Prefix +
| |
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
This format represents the following changes over that originally
specified for Neighbor Discovery [12]:
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 52]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Router Address (R)
1-bit router address flag. When set, indicates that the
Prefix field, in addition to advertising the indicated prefix,
contains a complete IP address assigned to the sending router.
This router IP address has the same scope and conforms to the
same lifetime values as the advertised prefix. This use of
the Prefix field is compatible with its use in advertising
the prefix itself, since prefix advertisement uses only the
leading number Prefix bits specified by the Prefix Length
field. Interpretation of this flag bit is thus independent
of the processing required for the On-Link (L) and Autonomous
Address-Configuration (A) flag bits.
Reserved1
Reduced from a 6-bit field to a 5-bit field to account for the
addition of the Router Address (R) bit.
In a solicited Router Advertisement, a home agent MUST, and all other
routers SHOULD, include at least one Prefix Information option with
the Router Address (R) bit set. Neighbor Discovery specifies that,
if including all options in a Router Advertisement causes the size of
the Advertisement to exceed the link MTU, multiple Advertisements can
be sent, each containing a subset of the options [12]. In this case,
at least one of these multiple Advertisements being sent instead
of a single larger solicited Advertisement, MUST include a Prefix
Information option with the Router Address (R) bit set.
All routers SHOULD include at least one Prefix Information option
with the Router Address (R) bit set, in each unsolicited multicast
Router Advertisement that they send. If multiple Advertisements
are being sent instead of a single larger unsolicited multicast
Advertisement, at least one of these multiple Advertisements SHOULD
include a Prefix Information option with the Router Address (R) bit
set.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 53]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
7.3. New Advertisement Interval Option Format
Mobile IPv6 defines a new Advertisement Interval option, used in
Router Advertisement messages to advertise the interval at which the
sending router sends unsolicited multicast Router Advertisements.
The format of the Advertisement Interval option is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Advertisement Interval |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
7
Length
8-bit unsigned integer. The length of the option (including
the type and length fields) in units of 8 octets. The value of
this field MUST be 1.
Reserved
This field is unused. It MUST be initialized to zero by the
sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver.
Advertisement Interval
32-bit unsigned integer. The maximum time, in milliseconds,
between successive unsolicited router Router Advertisement
messages sent by this router on this network interface. Using
the conceptual router configuration variables defined by
Neighbor Discovery [12], this field MUST be equal to the value
MaxRtrAdvInterval, expressed in milliseconds.
Routers MAY include this option in their Router Advertisements. A
mobile node receiving a Router Advertisement containing this option
SHOULD utilize the specified Advertisement Interval for that router
in its movement detection algorithm, as described in Section 11.4.1.
This option MUST be silently ignored for other Neighbor Discovery
messages.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 54]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
7.4. New Home Agent Information Option Format
Mobile IPv6 defines a new Home Agent Information option, used in
Router Advertisement messages sent by a home agent to advertise
information specific to this router's functionality as a home agent.
The format of the Home Agent Information option is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Home Agent Preference | Home Agent Lifetime |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
8
Length
8-bit unsigned integer. The length of the option (including
the type and length fields) in units of 8 octets. The value of
this field MUST be 1.
Reserved
This field is unused. It MUST be initialized to zero by the
sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver.
Home Agent Preference
16-bit signed, twos-complement integer. The preference for
the home agent sending this Router Advertisement, for use in
ordering the addresses returned to a mobile node in the Home
Agent Addresses field of a Home Agent Address Discovery Reply
message. Higher values mean more preferable. If this option
is not included in a Router Advertisement in which the Home
Agent (H) bit is set, the preference value for this home agent
SHOULD be considered to be 0. Values greater than 0 indicate a
home agent more preferable than this default value, and values
less than 0 indicate a less preferable home agent.
The manual configuration of the Home Agent Preference value
is described in Section 8.4. In addition, the sending home
agent MAY dynamically set the Home Agent Preference value, for
example basing it on the number of mobile nodes it is currently
serving or on its remaining resources for serving additional
mobile nodes; such dynamic settings are beyond the scope of
this document. Any such dynamic setting of the Home Agent
Preference, however, MUST set the preference appropriately,
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 55]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
relative to the default Home Agent Preference value of 0 that
may be in use by some home agents on this link (i.e., a home
agent not including a Home Agent Information option in its
Router Advertisements will be considered to have a Home Agent
Preference value of 0).
Home Agent Lifetime
16-bit unsigned integer. The lifetime associated with the
home agent in units of seconds. The default value is the same
as the Router Lifetime, as specified in the main body of the
Router Advertisement message. The maximum value corresponds
to 18.2 hours. A value of 0 MUST NOT be used. The Home Agent
Lifetime applies only to this router's usefulness as a home
agent; it does not apply to information contained in other
message fields or options.
Home agents MAY include this option in their Router Advertisements.
This option MUST NOT be included in a Router Advertisement in which
the Home Agent (H) bit (see Section 7.1) is not set. If this option
is not included in a Router Advertisement in which the Home Agent (H)
bit is set, the lifetime for this home agent MUST be considered to
be the same as the Router Lifetime in the Router Advertisement.
If multiple Advertisements are being sent instead of a single
larger unsolicited multicast Advertisement, all of the multiple
Advertisements with the Router Address (R) bit set MUST include this
option with the same contents, otherwise this option MUST be omitted
from all Advertisements.
This option MUST be silently ignored for other Neighbor Discovery
messages.
If both the Home Agent Preference and Home Agent Lifetime are set
to their default values specified above, this option SHOULD NOT be
included in the Router Advertisement messages sent by this home
agent.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 56]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
7.5. Changes to Sending Router Advertisements
The Neighbor Discovery protocol specification [12] limits routers to
a minimum interval of 3 seconds between sending unsolicited multicast
Router Advertisement messages from any given network interface
(limited by MinRtrAdvInterval and MaxRtrAdvInterval), stating that:
"Routers generate Router Advertisements frequently enough
that hosts will learn of their presence within a few
minutes, but not frequently enough to rely on an absence
of advertisements to detect router failure; a separate
Neighbor Unreachability Detection algorithm provides failure
detection."
This limitation, however, is not suitable to providing timely
movement detection for mobile nodes. Mobile nodes detect their
own movement by learning the presence of new routers as the mobile
node moves into wireless transmission range of them (or physically
connects to a new wired network), and by learning that previous
routers are no longer reachable. Mobile nodes MUST be able to
quickly detect when they move to a link served by a new router, so
that they can acquire a new care-of address and send Binding Updates
to register this care-of address with their home agent and to notify
correspondent nodes as needed.
Thus, to provide good support for mobile nodes, Mobile IPv6 relaxes
this limit such that routers MAY send unsolicited multicast Router
Advertisements more frequently. In particular, on network interfaces
where the router is expecting to provide service to visiting mobile
nodes (e.g., wireless network interfaces), or on which it is serving
as a home agent to one or more mobile nodes (who may return home and
need to hear its Advertisements), the router SHOULD be configured
with a smaller MinRtrAdvInterval value and MaxRtrAdvInterval value,
to allow sending of unsolicited multicast Router Advertisements more
often. Recommended values for these limits are:
- MinRtrAdvInterval 0.05 seconds
- MaxRtrAdvInterval 1.5 seconds
Use of these modified limits MUST be configurable, and specific
knowledge of the type of network interface in use SHOULD be taken
into account in configuring these limits for each network interface.
When sending unsolicited multicast Router Advertisements more
frequently than the standard limit on unsolicited multicast
Advertisement frequency, the sending router need not include all
options in each of these Advertisements, but it SHOULD include at
least one Prefix Information option with the Router Address (R) bit
set (Section 7.2) in each.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 57]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
7.6. Changes to Sending Router Solicitations
In addition to the limit on routers sending unsolicited multicast
Router Advertisement messages (Section 7.5), Neighbor Discovery
defines limits on nodes sending Router Solicitation messages, such
that a node SHOULD send no more than 3 Router Solicitations, and that
these 3 transmissions SHOULD be spaced at least 4 seconds apart.
However, these limits prevent a mobile node from finding a new
default router (and thus a new care-of address) quickly as it moves
about.
Mobile IPv6 relaxes this limit such that, while a mobile node is away
from home, it MAY send Router Solicitations more frequently. The
following limits for sending Router Solicitations are recommended for
mobile nodes while away from home:
- A mobile node that is not configured with any current care-of
address (e.g., the mobile node has moved since its previous
care-of address was configured), MAY send more than the defined
Neighbor Discovery limit of MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS Router
Solicitations.
- The rate at which a mobile node sends Router Solicitations MUST
be limited, although a mobile node MAY send Router Solicitations
more frequently than the defined Neighbor Discovery limit of
RTR_SOLICITATION_INTERVAL seconds. The minimum interval MUST
be configurable, and specific knowledge of the type of network
interface in use SHOULD be taken into account in configuring this
limit for each network interface. A recommended minimum interval
is 1 second.
- After sending at most MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS Router Solicitations,
a mobile node MUST reduce the rate at which it sends subsequent
Router Solicitations. Subsequent Router Solicitations SHOULD
be sent using a binary exponential backoff mechanism, doubling
the interval between consecutive Router Solicitations, up to a
maximum interval. The maximum interval MUST be configurable and
SHOULD be chosen appropriately based on the characteristics of
the type of network interface in use.
- While still searching for a new default router and care-of
address, a mobile node MUST NOT increase the rate at which it
sends Router Solicitations unless it has received a positive
indication (such as from lower network layers) that it has moved
to a new link. After successfully acquiring a new care-of
address, the mobile node SHOULD also increase the rate at which
it will send Router Solicitations when it next begins searching
for a new default router and care-of address.
- A mobile node that is currently configured with a care-of address
SHOULD NOT send Router Solicitations to the default router
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 58]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
on its current link, until its movement detection algorithm
(Section 11.4.1) determines that it has moved and that its
current care-of address might no longer be valid.
8. Requirements for Types of IPv6 Nodes
Mobile IPv6 places some special requirements on the functions
provided by different types of IPv6 nodes. This section summarizes
those requirements, identifying the functionality each requirement is
intended to support.
The requirements are set for the following groups of nodes:
- All IPv6 nodes.
- All IPv6 nodes with support for route optimization.
- All IPv6 routers.
- All Mobile IPv6 home agents.
- All Mobile IPv6 mobile nodes.
It is outside the scope of this specification to specify which
of these groups are mandatory in IPv6. We only describe what is
mandatory for a node that supports, for instance, route optimization.
Other specifications are expected to define the extent of IPv6.
8.1. General Requirements for All IPv6 Nodes
Any IPv6 node may at any time be a correspondent node of a mobile
node, either sending a packet to a mobile node or receiving a
packet from a mobile node. The following requirements are necessary
for every IPv6 node (whether host or router, whether mobile or
stationary), since otherwise communications may be impossible:
- The node MUST be able to validate a Home Address option received
in any IPv6 packet as described in Section 9.2.2.
- The node MUST be able to send a Binding Error message as
described in Section 9.4.6.
8.2. Route Optimization Requirements for All IPv6 Nodes
The ability of a correspondent node to participate in route
optimization is essential for the efficient operation of the IPv6
Internet, beneficial for robustness and reduction of jitter and
latency, and necessary to avoid congestion in the home network.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 59]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
The following requirements apply to all nodes that support route
optimization:
- The node MUST be able to participate in a return routability
procedure (Section 9.3).
- The node MUST be able to process Binding Update messages
(Section 9.4).
- The node MUST be able to return a Binding Acknowledgement message
(Section 6.1.8).
- The node MUST be able to maintain a Binding Cache of the
bindings received in accepted Binding Updates, as described in
Sections 9.1 and 9.5.
- The node MUST be able to insert a Routing Header type 2 into
packets to be sent to a mobile node, as described in Section 9.6.
- The node SHOULD be able to interpret ICMP messages as described
in Section 9.7.
8.3. Requirements for All IPv6 Routers
All IPv6 routers, even those not serving as a home agent for
Mobile IPv6, have an effect on how well mobile nodes can communicate:
- Every IPv6 router SHOULD be able to send an Advertisement
Interval option (Section 7.3) in each of its Router
Advertisements [12], to aid movement detection by mobile nodes
(as in Section 11.4.1). The use of this option in Router
Advertisements MUST be configurable.
- Every IPv6 router SHOULD be able to support sending unsolicited
multicast Router Advertisements at the faster rate described in
Section 7.5. The use of this faster rate MUST be configurable.
- Each router SHOULD include at least one prefix with the `R' bit
set and with its full IP address in its router advertisements (as
described in Section 7.2).
- Filtering routers SHOULD support different rules for Type 0 and
Type 2 Routing headers (see Section 6.4) so that filtering of
source routed packets (Type 0) will not necessarily limit MIPv6
traffic which is delivered via Type 2 Routing headers.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 60]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
8.4. Requirements for IPv6 Home Agents
In order for a mobile node to operate correctly while away from home,
at least one IPv6 router on the mobile node's home link must function
as a home agent for the mobile node. The following additional
requirements apply to all IPv6 routers capable of serving as a home
agent:
- Every home agent MUST be able to maintain an entry in its Binding
Cache for each mobile node for which it is serving as the home
agent (Section 10.1). Each such Binding Cache entry records the
mobile node's binding with its primary care-of address and is
marked as a "home registration" (Section 10.2).
- Every home agent MUST be able to intercept packets (using
proxy Neighbor Discovery [12]) addressed to a mobile node for
which it is currently serving as the home agent, on that mobile
node's home link, while the mobile node is away from home
(Section 10.4).
- Every home agent MUST be able to encapsulate [15] such
intercepted packets in order to tunnel them to the primary
care-of address for the mobile node indicated in its binding in
the home agent's Binding Cache (Section 10.5).
- Every home agent MUST support decapsulating [15] reverse tunneled
packets sent to it from a mobile node's home address. Every home
agent MUST also check that the source address in the tunneled
packets corresponds to the currently registered location of the
mobile node (Section 10.6).
- Every home agent MUST be able to return a Binding Acknowledgement
message in response to a Binding Update option received with the
Acknowledge (A) bit set (Section 10.2).
- Every home agent MUST maintain a separate Home Agents List for
each link on which it is serving as a home agent, as described in
Section 4.5.
- Every home agent MUST be able to accept packets addressed to
the "Mobile IPv6 Home-Agents" anycast address for the subnet
on which it is serving as a home agent [16], and MUST be
able to participate in dynamic home agent address discovery
(Section 10.9).
- Every home agent SHOULD support a configuration mechanism to
allow a system administrator to manually set the value to be sent
by this home agent in the Home Agent Preference field of the Home
Agent Information Option in Router Advertisements that it sends
(Section 7.4).
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 61]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- Every home agent SHOULD support sending ICMP Mobile Prefix
Advertisements (Section 6.8), and SHOULD respond to Mobile Prefix
Solicitations (Section 6.7). This behavior MUST be configurable,
so that home agents can be configured to avoid sending such
Prefix Advertisements according to the needs of the network
administration in the home domain.
8.5. Requirements for IPv6 Mobile Nodes
Finally, the following requirements apply to all IPv6 nodes capable
of functioning as mobile nodes:
- Every IPv6 mobile node MUST be able to perform IPv6 encapsulation
and decapsulation [15].
- Every IPv6 mobile node MUST support the return routability
procedure (Section 5.2.5).
- Every IPv6 mobile node MUST be able to send Binding Update
messages, as specified in Sections 11.6.1, 11.6.2, and 11.6.6.
- Every IPv6 mobile node MUST be able to receive and process
Binding Acknowledgement messages, as specified in Section 11.6.3.
- Every IPv6 mobile node MUST maintain a Binding Update List in
which it records the IP address of each other node to which it
has sent a Binding Update, for which the Lifetime sent in that
binding has not yet expired (Section 11.1).
- Every IPv6 mobile node MUST support receiving a Binding Refresh
Request (Section 6.1.2), by responding with a Binding Update
message.
- Every IPv6 mobile node MUST support sending packets containing a
Home Address option (Section 11.2.1).
- Every IPv6 mobile node MUST maintain a Home Agents List, as
described in Section 4.5.
- Every mobile node MUST support receiving Mobile Prefix
Advertisements (Section 11.3.4) and reconfiguring its home
address based on the prefix information contained therein.
- Every IPv6 mobile node SHOULD support use of the dynamic
home agent address discovery mechanism, as described in
Section 11.3.2.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 62]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
9. Correspondent Node Operation
This section explains the special processing required for the return
routability and binding procedures, as well as to manage the binding
cache, handle ICMP messages and send packets to a mobile node.
9.1. Conceptual Data Structures
Each IPv6 node maintains a Binding Cache of bindings for other nodes.
A separate Binding Cache SHOULD be maintained by each IPv6 node for
each of its IPv6 addresses. The Binding Cache MAY be implemented in
any manner consistent with the external behavior described in this
document, for example by being combined with the node's Destination
Cache as maintained by Neighbor Discovery [12]. When sending a
packet, the Binding Cache is searched before the Neighbor Discovery
conceptual Destination Cache [12] (i.e., any Binding Cache entry for
this destination SHOULD take precedence over any Destination Cache
entry for the same destination).
Each Binding Cache entry conceptually contains the following fields:
- The home address of the mobile node for which this is the Binding
Cache entry. This field is used as the key for searching the
Binding Cache for the destination address of a packet being sent.
If the destination address of the packet matches the home address
in the Binding Cache entry, this entry SHOULD be used in routing
that packet.
- The care-of address for the mobile node indicated by the home
address field in this Binding Cache entry. If the destination
address of a packet being routed by a node matches the home
address in this entry, the packet SHOULD be routed to this
care-of address. This is described in Section 9.6 for packets
originated by this node, and in Section 10.5 if this node is the
mobile node's home agent and the packet was intercepted by it on
the home link.
- A lifetime value, indicating the remaining lifetime for this
Binding Cache entry. The lifetime value is initialized from
the Lifetime field in the Binding Update that created or last
modified this Binding Cache entry. Once the lifetime of this
entry expires, the entry MUST be deleted from the Binding Cache.
- A flag indicating whether or not this Binding Cache entry is a
"home registration" entry.
- The maximum value of the Sequence Number field received in
previous Binding Updates for this mobile node home address.
The Sequence Number field is 16 bits long, and all comparisons
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 63]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
between Sequence Number values MUST be performed modulo 2**15 as
explained in Section 9.4.1.
- Recent usage information for this Binding Cache entry, as needed
to implement the cache replacement policy in use in the Binding
Cache and to assist in determining whether a Binding Refresh
Request should be sent when the lifetime of this entry nears
expiration.
Binding Cache entries not marked as "home registrations" MAY be
replaced at any time by any reasonable local cache replacement policy
but SHOULD NOT be unnecessarily deleted. The Binding Cache for any
one of a node's IPv6 addresses may contain at most one entry for
each mobile node home address. The contents of a node's Binding
Cache MUST NOT be changed in response to a Home Address option in
a received packet. The contents of all of a node's Binding Cache
entries, for each of its IPv6 addresses, MUST be cleared when the
node reboots.
9.2. Receiving Packets from a Mobile Node
Packets sent by a mobile node with either a Home Address destination
option or a Mobility Header (or both) require special processing at
the correspondent node as explained below.
9.2.1. Processing Mobility Header (MH) Messages
All IPv6 correspondent nodes MUST observe the following rules when
processing Mobility Header messages:
1. If an MH message of unknown type is received (Section 6.1, the
correspondent node SHOULD issue a Binding Error message to the
packet's Source Address with Status field set to 2. Finally, the
correspondent node MUST discard the packet.
2. If the "Next Header" field is not NO_NXTHDR (59 decimal), the
packet MUST be silently discarded.
3. The checksum must be verified as per Section 6.1.
Subsequent checks depend on the particular Mobility Header message,
as specified in Sections 9.3 and 9.4. Subsequent checks depend
on the particular Mobility Header message. There are two types
of Mobility Header messages. The return routability procedure
(Section 9.3) is used to verify liveness of the mobile node at both
its home address as well as its care-of address. These liveness
probes are used to secure binding updates.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 64]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
The other type of Mobility Header messages are directly concerned
with managing bindings (Section 9.4).
9.2.2. Receiving Packets with Home Address Destination Option
If the correspondent node has a Binding Cache Entry for the home
address of a mobile node, packets sent by the mobile node MAY include
a Home Address destination option. The correspondent node MUST
process the option in a manner consistent with exchanging the Home
Address field from the Home Address option into the IPv6 header and
replacing the original value of the Source Address field there.
After all IPv6 options have been processed, it MUST be possible to
process the packet without the knowledge that it came originally from
a care-of address or that a Home Address option was used.
Due to the threat of reflection attacks, this specification requires
that packets containing a Home Address option MUST be dropped if
there is no corresponding Binding Cache Entry for the given home
address and the packet was not protected by IPsec. A corresponding
Binding Cache Entry MUST have the currently registered care-of
address equal to the source address of the packet. A packet that
contains a Binding Update message and a Home Address option is
considered to pass the above tests if the Binding Update successfully
creates or updates a Binding Cache Entry.
If the packet is dropped due the above tests, the correspondent nodes
SHOULD send the Binding Error message to the source address of the
packet that contained the Home Address option (see Section 6.1.9).
The Status field in this message should be set to 1. These messages
SHOULD be rate-limited.
No additional authentication of the Home Address option is
required, except that if the IPv6 header of a packet is covered
by authentication, then that authentication MUST also cover the
Home Address option; this coverage is achieved automatically by the
definition of the Option Type code for the Home Address option, since
it indicates that the data within the option cannot change en-route
to the packet's final destination, and thus the option is included in
the authentication computation. By requiring that any authentication
of the IPv6 header also cover the Home Address option, the security
of the Source Address field in the IPv6 header is not compromised by
the presence of a Home Address option. Security issues related to
the Home Address option are discussed further in Section 5. When
attempting to verify authentication data in a packet that contains
a Home Address option, the receiving node MUST make the calculation
as if the care-of address were present in the Home Address option,
and the home address were present in the source IPv6 address field
of the IPv6 header. This conforms with the calculation specified in
section 11.2.2.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 65]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
9.3. Return Routability Procedure
This subsection specifies actions taken by a correspondent node
during the return routability procedure.
9.3.1. Receiving Home Test Init Messages
Upon receiving a Home Test Init message, the correspondent node
verifies the following:
- MH Type field for this message is 1.
- The Header Extension Length field MUST be greater than or equal
to the length specified in Section 6.1.3.
- The packet MUST NOT include a Home Address destination option.
In preparation for sending the corresponding Home Test Message,
the correspondent node checks that it has the necessary material
to engage in a return routability procedure, as specified in
Section 5.2. For that procedure, the correspondent node MUST have a
secret Kcn and a nonce Nj. If it does not have this material yet,
it MUST produce it before continuing with the return routability
procedure.
Section 9.3.3 specifies further processing.
9.3.2. Receiving Care-of Test Init Messages
Upon receiving a Care-of Test Init message, the correspondent node
verifies the following:
- MH Type field for this message is 2.
- The Header Extension Length field MUST be greater than or equal
to the length specified in Section 6.1.4.
- The packet MUST NOT include a Home Address destination option.
In preparation for sending the corresponding Care-of Test Message,
the correspondent node checks that it has the necessary material
to engage in a return routability procedure, as specified in
Section 5.2. For that procedure, the correspondent node MUST have a
secret Kcn and a nonce Nl. If it does not have this material yet,
it MUST produce it before continuing with the return routability
procedure.
Section 9.3.4 specifies further processing.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 66]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
9.3.3. Sending Home Test Messages
Unless already created, the correspondent node creates a "Home
Cookie" and an associated "Home Nonce Index". It then creates a Home
Test message (Section 6.1.5) and sends it to the mobile node at the
latter's home address.
9.3.4. Sending Care-of Test Messages
Unless already created, the correspondent node creates a "Care-of
Cookie" and an associated "Care-of Nonce Index". It then creates a
Care-of Test message (Section 6.1.6) and sends it to the mobile node
at the latter's care-of address.
9.4. Processing Bindings
This section explains how the correspondent node processes the
binding cache messages. These messages are:
- Binding Update
- Binding Refresh Request
- Binding Acknowledgement
- Binding Error
9.4.1. Receiving Binding Updates
Before accepting a Binding Update message, the receiving node MUST
validate the Binding Update according to the following tests:
- The packet MUST contain a Home Address option.
- The Header Len field in the Binding Update option is greater than
or equal to the length specified in Section 6.1.7.
- The Sequence Number field in the Binding Update message is
greater than the Sequence Number received in the previous Binding
Update for this home address, if any.
This Sequence Number comparison MUST be performed modulo 2**16,
i.e., the number is a free running counter represented modulo
65536. A Sequence Number in a received Binding Update is
considered less than or equal to the last received number if
its value lies in the range of the last received number and the
preceding 32767 values, inclusive. For example, if the last
received sequence number was 15, then messages with sequence
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 67]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
numbers 0 through 15, as well as 32784 through 65535, would be
considered less than or equal.
When the return routability procedure is used as an authorization
method, the following are also required:
- The Home and Care-of Nonce Index values in the Nonce Indices
mobility option are recognized by the correspondent node. As
described in Section 5.2, the correspondent node discards Nonce
values that are too old.
- The correspondent node MUST re-generate the Home Cookie and the
Care-of Cookie from the information contained in the packet.
It then generates the session key Kbu and uses it to verify
the authenticator field in the Binding Update as specified in
Section 6.1.7. Note that a care-of address different from the
Source Address MAY have been specified by including an Alternate
Care-of Address mobility option in the Binding Update message.
When such message is received and the return routability
procedure is used as an authorization method, the correspondent
node MUST verify the authenticator by using the address within
the Alternate Care-of Address in the calculations.
- The Binding Authorization Data option MUST be present, and its
contents MUST be satisfy rules presented in Section 5.2.6.
If the mobile node sends a sequence number which is not greater than
the sequence number from the last successful Binding Update, then the
receiving node MUST send back a Binding Acknowledgement with status
code 141, and the last accepted sequence number in the Sequence
Number field of the Binding Acknowledgement.
If the mobile node sends a Home or Care-of Nonce Index value which is
no longer recognized by the correspondent node, then the receiving
node MUST send back a Binding Acknowledgement with status code 144 or
145, respectively.
Any Binding Update which fails to satisfy all of these tests for
any reason other than insufficiency of the Sequence Number or Nonce
Indices MUST be silently ignored, and the packet carrying the Binding
Update MUST be discarded.
In this section, the care-of address refers to the IPv6 address,
which was originally located in the IPv6 header when the packet was
transmitted by the mobile node.
If the Binding Update is valid according to the tests above, then the
Binding Update is processed further as follows:
- If the Lifetime specified in the Binding Update is nonzero and
the specified Care-of Address is not equal to the home address
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 68]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
for the binding, then this is a request to cache a binding for
the mobile node. If the Home Registration (H) bit is set in the
Binding Update, the Binding Update is processed according to the
procedure specified in Section 10.2; otherwise, it is processed
according to the procedure specified in Section 9.4.2.
- If the Lifetime specified in the Binding Update is zero or the
specified Care-of Address matches the home address for the
binding, then this is a request to delete the mobile node's
cached binding. If the Home Registration (H) bit is set in the
Binding Update, the Binding Update is processed according to the
procedure specified in Section 10.3; otherwise, it is processed
according to the procedure specified in Section 9.4.3.
9.4.2. Requests to Cache a Binding
This section describes the processing of a valid Binding Update that
requests a node to cache a mobile node's binding, for which the Home
Registration (H) bit is not set in the Binding Update.
In this case, the receiving node SHOULD create a new entry in its
Binding Cache for this mobile node, or update its existing Binding
Cache entry for this mobile node, if such an entry already exists.
The lifetime for the Binding Cache entry is initialized from the
Lifetime field specified in the Binding Update, although this
lifetime MAY be reduced by the node caching the binding; the lifetime
for the Binding Cache entry MUST NOT be greater than the Lifetime
value specified in the Binding Update. Any Binding Cache entry MUST
be deleted after the expiration of its lifetime.
The Sequence Number value received from a mobile node in a Binding
Update is stored by a correspondent node in its Binding Cache entry
for that mobile node. If the receiving correspondent node has no
Binding Cache entry for the sending mobile node, it MUST accept any
Sequence Number value in a received Binding Update from this mobile
node.
9.4.3. Requests to Delete a Binding
This section describes the processing of a valid Binding Update that
requests a node to delete a mobile node's binding from its Binding
Cache, for which the Home Registration (H) bit is not set in the
Binding Update.
Any existing binding for the mobile node MUST be deleted. A Binding
Cache entry for the mobile node MUST NOT be created in response to
receiving the Binding Update.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 69]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
If the binding cache entry was created by use of return routability
nonces, the correspondent node MUST ensure that the same nonces are
not used again with the particular home and care-of address. If
both nonces are still valid, the correspondent node has to remember
the particular combination of nonce indexes, addresses, and sequence
number as illegal, until at least one of the nonces has become too
old.
9.4.4. Sending Binding Acknowledgements
When any node receives a packet containing a Binding Update message
in which the Acknowledge (A) bit is set, it MUST return a Binding
Acknowledgement message acknowledging receipt of the Binding Update.
If the node accepts the Binding Update and creates or updates an
entry in its Binding Cache for this binding, the Status field in the
Binding Acknowledgement MUST be set to a value less than 128; if, on
the other hand the Binding Update is accepted and the `A' bit is not
set, the node SHOULD NOT send a Binding Acknowledgement. If the node
rejects the Binding Update and does not create or update an entry for
this binding, a Binding Acknowledgement MUST be sent even if the `A'
bit was not set, and the Status field in the Binding Acknowledgement
MUST be set to a value greater than or equal to 128. Specific values
for the Status field are described in Section 6.1.8 and in the IANA
registry of assigned numbers [18].
The packet in which the Binding Acknowledgement is returned
MUST meet the specific authentication requirements for Binding
Acknowledgements, defined in Section 5.2. Furthermore, if the packet
is to be sent to the mobile node at any address other than the mobile
node's home address, it MUST be sent using a Routing header (even if
the binding was rejected). The intermediate IP address, to which
the packet will be delivered immediately before the home address, is
determined as follows:
- Whenever the Binding Update is accepted with a nonzero lifetime,
the routing header will be constructed using the care-of address
as described in Section 9.6.
- Otherwise, if the Source IP Address of the packet containing
the Binding Update, is legal for inclusion in a Routing Header,
the routing header will be constructed using that IP address.
Note that multicast addresses, link-local addresses, loopback
addresses, IPv4 mapped addresses, and the unspecified address,
MUST NOT be used within a Routing Header for the Binding
Acknowledgement.
Otherwise, if the Binding Update has a zero lifetime but the Source
IP address is not allowable for use within the Routing Header,
the Binding Acknowledgment MUST be sent to the mobile node's home
address.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 70]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Entries in a node's Binding Cache MUST be deleted when their lifetime
expires.
9.4.5. Sending Binding Refresh Requests
If a Binding Cache entry being deleted is still in active use
in sending packets to a mobile node, the next packet sent to the
mobile node will be routed normally to the mobile node's home link.
Communication with the mobile node continues, but the tunneling
from the home network creates additional overhead and latency in
delivering packets to the mobile node.
If the sender knows that the Binding Cache entry is still in active
use, it MAY send a Binding Refresh Request message to the mobile node
in an attempt to avoid this overhead and latency due to deleting and
recreating the Binding Cache entry. The Binding Refresh Request
message is sent in the same way as any packet addressed to the mobile
node (Section 9.6).
The correspondent node MAY retransmit Binding Refresh Request
messages provided that rate limitation is applied. The correspondent
node SHOULD stop retransmitting when it receive a Home Test Init
message, as the mobile node is responsible for retransmissions during
the return routability procedure.
9.4.6. Sending Binding Error Messages
If the correspondent node receives a packet with a Home Address
destination option it MUST verify that it has a binding for that
mobile node. Specifically, it MUST have a binding entry for the
mobile node's home address (as obtained from the Home Address option)
at the mobile node's care-of address (from the IP source address of
the packet). If the correspondent node does not find such a binding
entry, it MUST discard the packet. It MUST also return a Binding
Error message (Section 6.1.9), subject to rate limiting in the same
manner as is done for ICMPv6 messages [14].
9.5. Cache Replacement Policy
Conceptually, a node maintains a separate timer for each entry in its
Binding Cache. When creating or updating a Binding Cache entry in
response to a received and accepted Binding Update, the node sets the
timer for this entry to the specified Lifetime period. Any entry in
a node's Binding Cache MUST be deleted after the expiration of the
Lifetime specified in the Binding Update from which the entry was
created or last updated.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 71]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Each node's Binding Cache will, by necessity, have a finite size.
A node MAY use any reasonable local policy for managing the space
within its Binding Cache, except that any entry marked as a "home
registration" (Section 10.2) MUST NOT be deleted from the cache until
the expiration of its lifetime period. When such "home registration"
entries are deleted, the home agent MUST also cease intercepting
packets on the mobile node's home link addressed to the mobile node
(Section 10.4), just as if the mobile node had de-registered its
primary care-of address (see Section 10.3).
When attempting to add a new "home registration" entry in response
to a Binding Update with the Home Registration (H) bit set, if no
sufficient space can be found, the node MUST reject the Binding
Update and MUST return a Binding Acknowledgement to the sending
mobile node, in which the Status field is set to 131 (insufficient
resources). When otherwise attempting to add a new entry to its
Binding Cache, a node MAY, if needed, choose to drop any entry
already in its Binding Cache, other than "home registration"
entries, in order to make space for the new entry. For example, a
"least-recently used" (LRU) strategy for cache entry replacement
among entries not marked as "home registrations" is likely to
work well unless the size of the Binding Cache is substantially
insufficient.
If the node sends a packet to a destination for which it has dropped
the entry from its Binding Cache, the packet will be routed through
the mobile node's home link. The mobile node can detect this, and
establish a new binding if necessary.
9.6. Sending Packets to a Mobile Node
Before sending any packet, the sending node SHOULD examine its
Binding Cache for an entry for the destination address to which the
packet is being sent. If the sending node has a Binding Cache entry
for this address, the sending node SHOULD use a Routing header to
route the packet to this mobile node (the destination node) by way
of the care-of address in the binding recorded in that Binding Cache
entry. For example, assuming use of a Type 2 Routing header (see
Section 6.4), if no other use of a Routing header is involved in
the routing of this packet, the mobile node sets the fields in the
packet's IPv6 header and Routing header as follows:
- The Destination Address in the packet's IPv6 header is set to
the mobile node's care-of address copied from the Binding Cache
entry.
- The Routing header is initialized to contain a single route
segment, with an Address of the mobile node's home address (the
original destination address to which the packet was being sent).
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 72]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Following the definition of a Type 2 Routing header in Section 6.4,
this packet will be routed to the mobile node's care-of address,
where it will be delivered to the mobile node (the mobile node has
associated the care-of address with its network interface).
Note that following the above conceptual model in an implementation
creates some additional requirements for path MTU discovery since the
layer that decides the packet size (e.g., TCP and applications using
UDP) needs to be aware of the size of the headers added by the IP
layer on the sending node.
The IP layer will insert the routing header before performing IPsec
processing. The IPsec Security Policy Database will be consulted
based on the IP source address and the final IP destination (which
will be in the routing header). The definition of AH ensures that
the AH calculation is done on the packet in the form it will have on
the receiver after advancing the routing header.
If, instead, the sending node has no Binding Cache entry for the
destination address to which the packet is being sent, the sending
node simply sends the packet normally, with no Routing header. If
the destination node is not a mobile node (or is a mobile node that
is currently at home), the packet will be delivered directly to this
node and processed normally by it. If, however, the destination node
is a mobile node that is currently away from home, the packet will
be intercepted by the mobile node's home agent and tunneled (using
IPv6 encapsulation [15]) to the mobile node's current primary care-of
address, as described in Section 10.5. The mobile node MAY then send
a Binding Update to the sending node, as described in Section 11.6.2,
allowing the sending node to create a Binding Cache entry for its use
in sending subsequent packets to this mobile node.
9.7. Receiving ICMP Error Messages
When the correspondent node has a Binding Cache entry for a mobile
node, all traffic destined to the mobile node goes directly to the
current care-of address of the mobile node using a Routing header.
Any ICMP error message caused by packets on their way to the care-of
address will be returned in the normal manner to the correspondent
node.
On the other hand, if the correspondent node has no Binding Cache
entry for the mobile node, the packet will be routed through the
MN's home link. Any ICMP error message caused by the packet on its
way to the mobile node while in the tunnel, will be transmitted
to the mobile node's home agent. By the definition of IPv6
encapsulation [15], the home agent MUST relay certain ICMP error
messages back to the original sender of the packet, which in this
case is the correspondent node.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 73]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Likewise, if a packet for a mobile node arrives at the mobile node's
previous link and is intercepted there by a home agent for the mobile
node's previous care-of address (see Section 11.6.6), the packet will
be tunneled to the mobile node's new care-of address. As above, any
ICMP error message caused by the packet while in this tunnel will
be returned to that home agent, which MUST relay certain ICMP error
messages back to the correspondent node [15]. The relayed packet
MUST NOT contain a routing header entry with the care-of address of
the mobile node.
Thus, in all cases, any meaningful ICMP error messages caused by
packets from a correspondent node to a mobile node will be returned
to the correspondent node. If the correspondent node receives
persistent ICMP Destination Unreachable messages after sending
packets to a mobile node based on an entry in its Binding Cache, the
correspondent node SHOULD delete this Binding Cache entry.
10. Home Agent Operation
10.1. Conceptual Data Structures
Each home agent MUST maintain a Binding Cache and Home Agents List.
The rules for maintaining a Binding Cache are same for home
agents and correspondent nodes, and have already been described in
Section 9.1. In addition, if an entry in a node's Binding Cache
for which the node is serving as a home agent is marked as a "home
registration" entry, it MUST NOT be deleted by the home agent until
the expiration of its binding lifetime.
The Home Agents List is maintained by each home agent (as well as
each mobile node), recording information about each home agent from
which this node has received a Router Advertisement in which the Home
Agent (H) bit is set, for which the remaining lifetime for this list
entry (defined below) has not yet expired. The home agents list is
thus similar to the Default Router List conceptual data structure
maintained by each host for Neighbor Discovery [12], although the
Home Agents List MAY be implemented in any manner consistent with the
external behavior described in this document.
Each home agent maintains a separate Home Agents List for each link
on which it is serving as a home agent; this list is used by a home
agent in the dynamic home agent address discovery mechanism. Each
mobile node, while away from home, also maintains a Home Agents
List, to enable it to notify a home agent on its previous link when
it moves to a new link; a mobile node MAY maintain a separate Home
Agents List for each link on which it has a home agent, or it MAY
maintain a single list for all links. Each Home Agents List entry
conceptually contains the following fields:
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 74]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- The link-local IP address of a router on the link, that this
node currently believes is operating as a home agent for that
link. A new entry is created or an existing entry is updated
in the Home Agents List in response to receipt of a valid
Router Advertisement in which the Home Agent (H) bit is set.
The link-local address of the home agent is learned through
the Source Address of the Router Advertisements received from
it [12].
- One or more global IP addresses for this home agent, learned
through Prefix Information options with the Router Address (R)
bit set, received in Router Advertisements from this link-local
address. Global addresses for the router in a Home Agents List
entry MUST be deleted once the prefix associated with that
address is no longer valid [12].
Are there interactions with the new Router Advertisement
stuff?
- The remaining lifetime of this Home Agents List entry. If a Home
Agent Information Option is present in a Router Advertisement
received from a home agent, the lifetime of the Home Agents List
entry representing that home agent is initialized from the Home
Agent Lifetime field in the option; otherwise, the lifetime
is initialized from the Router Lifetime field in the received
Router Advertisement. The Home Agents List entry lifetime is
decremented until it reaches zero, at which time this entry MUST
be deleted from the Home Agents List.
- The preference for this home agent; higher values indicate a more
preferable home agent. The preference value is taken from the
Home Agent Preference field (a signed, twos-complement integer)
in the received Router Advertisement, if the Router Advertisement
contains a Home Agent Information Option, and is otherwise set
to the default value of 0. A home agent uses this preference
in ordering the Home Agents List returned in an ICMP Home
Agent Address Discovery message in response to a mobile node's
initiation of dynamic home agent address discovery. A mobile
node uses this preference in determining which of the home agents
on its previous link to notify when it moves to a new link.
10.2. Primary Care-of Address Registration
This section describes the processing of a valid Binding Update that
requests the receiving node to serve as its home agent, registering
its primary care-of address.
To begin processing the Binding Update, the home agent MUST perform
the following sequence of tests:
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 75]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- If the node is not a router that implements home agent
functionality, then the node MUST reject the Binding Update
and MUST return a Binding Acknowledgement to the mobile node,
in which the Status field is set to 132 (home registration not
supported).
- Else, if the home address for the binding (the Home Address field
in the packet's Home Address option) is not an on-link IPv6
address with respect to the home agent's current Prefix List,
then the home agent MUST reject the Binding Update and SHOULD
return a Binding Acknowledgement to the mobile node, in which the
Status field is set to 133 (not home subnet).
- Else, if the home agent chooses to reject the Binding Update for
any other reason (e.g., insufficient resources to serve another
mobile node as a home agent), then the home agent SHOULD return a
Binding Acknowledgement to the mobile node, in which the Status
field is set to an appropriate value to indicate the reason for
the rejection.
- A Home Address destination option MUST be present in the message.
- Finally, if the Duplicate Address Detection (D) bit is set in the
Binding Update, this home agent MUST perform Duplicate Address
Detection [13] on the mobile node's home link for the link-local
address associated with the home address in this binding, before
returning the Binding Acknowledgement. This ensures that no
other node on the home link was using the mobile node's home
address when the Binding Update arrived
If home agent accepts the Binding Update, it MUST then create a
new entry in its Binding Cache for this mobile node, or update its
existing Binding Cache entry, if such an entry already exists. The
Home Address field as received in the Home Address option provides
the home address of the mobile node. The care-of address for this
Binding Cache entry is determined as follows:
- If the Alternate Care-of Address option is present, the care-of
address is the address in that option.
- Otherwise, the care-of address is the the Source Address field in
the packet's IPv6 header.
The home agent MUST mark this Binding Cache entry as a "home
registration" to indicate that the node is serving as a home
agent for this binding. Binding Cache entries marked as a "home
registration" MUST be excluded from the normal cache replacement
policy used for the Binding Cache (Section 9.5) and MUST NOT be
removed from the Binding Cache until the expiration of the Lifetime
period.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 76]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
When the 'D' bit is set, the address used for Duplicate Address
Detection SHOULD be the mobile node's link-local address. Normal
processing for Duplicate Address Detection specifies that, in
certain cases, the node SHOULD delay sending the initial Neighbor
Solicitation message of Duplicate Address Detection by a random
delay between 0 and MAX_RTR_SOLICITATION_DELAY [12, 13]; however, in
this case, the home agent SHOULD NOT perform such a delay. If this
Duplicate Address Detection fails, then the home agent MUST reject
the Binding Update and MUST return a Binding Acknowledgement to the
mobile node, in which the Status field is set to 138 (Duplicate
Address Detection failed). When the home agent sends a successful
Binding Acknowledgement to the mobile node, in response to a Binding
Update with the `D' bit set, the home agent assures to the mobile
node that its home address will continue to be kept unique by the
home agent at least as long as the lifetime granted for that home
address binding is not over.
If the `S' bit field in the Binding Update is zero, The home agent
creates or updates Binding Cache entries for each of possibly
several home addresses. The set of such home addresses is formed
by replacing the routing prefix for the given home address with
all other routing prefixes on the mobile node's home link that are
supported by the home agent processing the Binding Update. The home
agent creates such a separate primary care-of address registration
for each such home address. Note that the same considerations for
Duplicate Address Detection apply for each affected home address.
The specific addresses which are to be tested before accepting the
Binding Update, and later to be defended by performing Duplicate
Address Detection, depend on the settings of the `S' and `L' bits, as
follows:
- S=0 & L=0: Defend all non link-local unicast addresses possible
on link.
- S=0 & L=1: Defend all non link-local unicast addresses possible
on link and the derived link-local.
- S=1 & L=0: Defend the given address.
- S=1 & L=1: Defend both the given non link-local unicast (home)
address and the derived link-local.
The lifetime of the Binding Cache entry depends on a number of
factors:
- The lifetime for the Binding Cache entry MUST NOT be greater
than the remaining valid lifetime for the subnet prefix in the
mobile node's home address specified with the Binding Update,
and MUST NOT be greater than the Lifetime value specified in the
Binding Update. The remaining valid lifetime for this prefix is
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 77]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
determined by the home agent based on its own Prefix List entry
for this prefix [12].
- However, if the `S' bit field in the Binding Update is zero, the
lifetime for the each Binding Cache entry MUST NOT be greater
than the minimum remaining valid lifetime for all subnet prefixes
on the mobile node's home link. If the value of the Lifetime
field specified by the mobile node in its Binding Update is
greater than this prefix lifetime, the home agent MUST decrease
the binding lifetime to less than or equal to the prefix valid
lifetime.
- The home agent MAY further decrease the specified lifetime for
the binding, for example based on a local policy. The resulting
lifetime is stored by the home agent in the Binding Cache entry,
and this Binding Cache entry MUST be deleted by the home agent
after the expiration of this lifetime.
Regardless of the setting of the `A' bit in the Binding Update, the
home agent MUST return a Binding Acknowledgement to the mobile node,
constructed as follows:
- The Status field MUST be set to a value 0, indicating success.
- The Sequence Number field MUST be copied from the Sequence Number
given in the Binding Update.
- The Lifetime field MUST be set to the remaining lifetime for
the binding as set by the home agent in its "home registration"
Binding Cache entry for the mobile node, as described above.
- The Refresh field MUST be set to a value less than or equal to
the Lifetime value being returned in the Binding Update. If the
home agent stores the Binding Cache entry in nonvolatile storage
(that survives the crash or other failure of the home agent),
then the Refresh field SHOULD be set to the same value as the
Lifetime field; otherwise, the home agent MAY set the Refresh
field to a value less than the Lifetime field, to indicate that
the mobile node SHOULD attempt to refresh its home registration
at the indicated shorter interval (although the home agent will
still retain the registration for the Lifetime period, even if
the mobile node does not refresh its registration within the
Refresh period).
The rules for selecting the Destination IP address (and possibly
Routing Header construction) for the Binding Acknowledgement to the
mobile node are the same as in section 9.4.4.
In addition, the home agent MUST follow the procedure defined in
Section 10.4 to intercept packets on the mobile node's home link
addressed to the mobile node, while the home agent is serving as
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 78]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
the home agent for this mobile node. The home agent MUST also be
prepared to accept reverse tunneled packets from the new care-of
address of the mobile node, as described in Section 10.6. Finally,
the home agent MUST also propagate new home network prefixes, as
described in Section 10.9.1.
10.3. Primary Care-of Address De-Registration
When a node receives a Binding Update, it MUST validate it and
determine the type of Binding Update according to the steps described
in Section 9.4.1. This section describes the processing of a valid
Binding Update that requests the receiving node to no longer serve as
its home agent, de-registering its primary care-of address.
To begin processing the Binding Update, the home agent MUST perform
the following test:
- If the receiving node has no entry marked as a "home
registration" in its Binding Cache for this mobile node, then
this node MUST reject the Binding Update and SHOULD return a
Binding Acknowledgement to the mobile node, in which the Status
field is set to 137 (not home agent for this mobile node).
If the home agent does not reject the Binding Update as described
above, then it MUST delete any existing entry in its Binding Cache
for this mobile node, and proceed as follows.
The home agent MUST return a Binding Acknowledgement to the mobile
node, constructed as follows:
- The Status field MUST be set to a value 0, indicating success.
- The Sequence Number field MUST be copied from the Sequence Number
given in the Binding Update.
- The Lifetime field MUST be set to zero.
- The Refresh field MUST be set to zero.
In addition, the home agent MUST stop intercepting packets on
the mobile node's home link that are addressed to the mobile node
(Section 10.4).
The rules for selecting the Destination IP address (and possibly
Routing Header construction) for the Binding Acknowledgement to the
mobile node are the same as in section 9.4.4.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 79]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
10.4. Intercepting Packets for a Mobile Node
While a node is serving as the home agent for mobile node it MUST
attempt to intercept packets on the mobile node's home link that are
addressed to the mobile node, and MUST tunnel each intercepted packet
to the mobile node using IPv6 encapsulation [15].
In order to do this, when a node begins serving as the home agent
it MUST multicast onto the home link a Neighbor Advertisement
message [12] on behalf of the mobile node. Specifically, the home
agent performs the following steps:
- The home agent examines the value of the `S' bit in the received
Binding Update message. If this bit is nonzero, the following
step is carried out only for the individual home address
specified for this binding. If, instead, this bit is zero, then
the following step is carried out for each address for the mobile
node formed from the interface identifier in the mobile node's
home address in this binding (the remaining low-order bits in
the address after the configured subnet prefix), together with
each one of the subnet prefixes currently considered by the home
agent to be on-link (including both the link-local and site-local
prefix).
- For each specific IP address for the mobile node determined
in the first step above, the home agent sends a Neighbor
Advertisement message [12] to the all-nodes multicast address
on the home link, to advertise the home agent's own link-layer
address for this IP address on behalf of the mobile node.
All fields in each such Neighbor Advertisement message SHOULD be
set in the same way they would be set by the mobile node itself
if sending this Neighbor Advertisement while at home [12], with
the following exceptions:
* The Target Address in the Neighbor Advertisement message MUST
be set to the specific IP address for the mobile node.
* The Advertisement MUST include a Target Link-layer Address
option specifying the home agent's link-layer address.
* The Router (R) bit in the Advertisement MUST be set to zero.
* The Solicited Flag (S) in the Advertisement MUST NOT be set,
since it was not solicited by any Neighbor Solicitation
message.
* The Override Flag (O) in the Advertisement MUST be set,
indicating that the Advertisement SHOULD override any
existing Neighbor Cache entry at any node receiving it.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 80]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Any node on the home link receiving one of the Neighbor Advertisement
messages described above will thus update its Neighbor Cache to
associate the mobile node's address with the home agent's link
layer address, causing it to transmit any future packets for the
mobile node normally destined to this address instead to the mobile
node's home agent. Since multicasting on the local link (such as
Ethernet) is typically not guaranteed to be reliable, the home
agent MAY retransmit this Neighbor Advertisement message up to
MAX_ADVERT_REXMIT times to increase its reliability. It is still
possible that some nodes on the home link will not receive any of
these Neighbor Advertisements, but these nodes will eventually be
able to detect the link-layer address change for the mobile node's
home address, through use of Neighbor Unreachability Detection [12].
While a node is serving as a home agent for some mobile node (it
still has a "home registration" entry for this mobile node in its
Binding Cache), the home agent uses IPv6 Neighbor Discovery [12] to
intercept unicast packets on the home link addressed to the mobile
node's home address. In order to intercept packets in this way, the
home agent MUST act as a proxy for this mobile node, and reply to any
received Neighbor Solicitation messages for it. When a home agent
receives a Neighbor Solicitation message, it MUST check if the Target
Address specified in the message matches the home address of any
mobile node for which it has a Binding Cache entry marked as a "home
registration". (Note that Binding Update messages with the `S' bit
set to zero will result in multiple Binding Cache entries, so checks
on all these entries necessarily include all possible home addresses
for the mobile node).
If such an entry exists in the home agent's Binding Cache, the home
agent MUST reply to the Neighbor Solicitation message with a Neighbor
Advertisement message, giving the home agent's own link-layer address
as the link-layer address for the specified Target Address. In
addition, the Router (R) bit in the Advertisement MUST be set to
zero. Acting as a proxy in this way allows other nodes on the mobile
node's home link to resolve the mobile node's IPv6 home address, and
allows the home agent to defend these addresses on the home link for
Duplicate Address Detection [12].
10.5. Tunneling Intercepted Packets to a Mobile Node
For any packet sent to a mobile node from the mobile node's home
agent (for which the home agent is the original sender of the
packet), the home agent is operating as a correspondent node of
the mobile node for this packet and the procedures described in
Section 9.6 apply. The home agent (as a correspondent node) uses a
Routing header to route the packet to the mobile node by way of the
care-of address in the home agent's Binding Cache (the mobile node's
primary care-of address, in this case).
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 81]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
While the mobile node is away from home and this node is acting
as the mobile node's home agent, the home agent intercepts any
packets on the home link addressed to the mobile node's home
address (including addresses formed from other on-link prefixes,
if the 'S' bit was zero in the Binding Update), as described in
Section 10.4. The home agent cannot use a Routing header to forward
these intercepted packets to the mobile node, since it cannot modify
the packet in flight without invalidating any existing IPv6 AH [5] or
ESP [6] header present in the packet.
In order to forward each intercepted packet to the mobile node, the
home agent MUST tunnel the packet to the mobile node using IPv6
encapsulation [15]; the tunnel entry point node is the home agent,
and the tunnel exit point node is the primary care-of address as
registered with the home agent. When a home agent encapsulates
an intercepted packet for forwarding to the mobile node, the home
agent sets the Source Address in the new tunnel IP header to the
home agent's own IP address, and sets the Destination Address
in the tunnel IP header to the mobile node's primary care-of
address. When received by the mobile node (using its primary care-of
address), normal processing of the tunnel header [15] will result in
decapsulation and processing of the original packet by the mobile
node.
However, packets addressed to the mobile node's link-local address
MUST NOT be tunneled to the mobile node. Instead, such a packet MUST
be discarded, and the home agent SHOULD return an ICMP Destination
Unreachable, Code 3, message to the packet's Source Address (unless
this Source Address is a multicast address). Packets addressed to
the mobile node's site-local address SHOULD be tunneled to the mobile
node by default, but this behavior MUST be configurable to disable
it; currently, the exact definition and semantics of a "site" and a
site-local address are incompletely defined in IPv6, and this default
behavior might change at some point in the future.
Tunneling of multicast packets to a mobile node follows similar
limitations to those defined above for unicast packets addressed to
the mobile node's link-local and site-local addresses. Multicast
packets addressed to a multicast address with link-local scope [3],
to which the mobile node is subscribed, MUST NOT be tunneled
to the mobile node; such packets SHOULD be silently discarded
(after delivering to other local multicast recipients). Multicast
packets addressed to a multicast address with scope larger
than link-local but smaller than global (e.g., site-local and
organization-local) [3], to which the mobile node is subscribed,
SHOULD be tunneled to the mobile node by default, but this behavior
MUST be configurable to disable it; this default behavior might
change at some point in the future as the definition of these scopes
become more completely defined in IPv6.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 82]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Before tunneling a packet to the mobile node, the home agent MUST
perform any IPsec processing as indicated by the security policy data
base.
10.6. Handling Reverse Tunneled Packets from a Mobile Node
Unless a binding has been established between the mobile node and a
correspondent node, traffic from the mobile node to the correspondent
node goes through a reverse tunnel. This tunnel extends between the
mobile node and the home agent. Home agents MUST support reverse
tunneling as follows:
- The tunneled traffic arrives to the home agent using IPv6
encapsulation [15].
- The tunnel entry point is the primary care-of address as
registered with the home agent and the tunnel exit point is the
home agent.
- When a home agent decapsulates a tunneled packet from the mobile
node, the home agent verifies that the Source Address in the
tunnel IP header is the mobile node's primary care-of address.
Reverse tunneled packets MAY be discarded unless accompanied by a
valid AH or ESP header, depending on the security policies used by
the home agent. In any case, the home agent MUST check that the
source address in the tunneled packets corresponds to the currently
registered location of the mobile node, as otherwise any node in the
Internet could send traffic through the home agent and escape ingress
filtering limitations.
The support for authenticated reverse tunneling allows the home agent
to protect the home network and correspondent nodes from malicious
nodes masquerading as a mobile node, even if they know the current
location of the real mobile node.
10.7. Protecting Return Routability Packets
The return routability procedure described in Section 5 assumes that
the confidentiality of the Home Test Init and Home Test messages is
protected as it is tunneled from the home agent to the mobile node.
Therefore, the home agent MUST support IPsec ESP for the protection
of packets belonging to the return routability procedure. Support
for a non-null encryption transform MUST be available. In this case
it isn't necessary to distinguish between different kinds of packets
within the return routability procedure.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 83]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
The above protection SHOULD be turned on and used with all mobile
nodes. The use is controlled by configuration of the IPsec security
policy database both at the mobile node and at the home agent.
As described earlier, the Binding Update and Binding Acknowledgement
messages require protection between the home agent and the mobile
node. These messages and the return routability messages employ
the same protocol from the point of view of the security policy
database, the Mobility Header. One way to set up the security policy
database is to have one rule for the Mobility Header traffic between
the mobile node and the home agent addresses, and an optional rule
following it for Mobility Header traffic between the mobile node and
any other address.
10.8. Receiving Router Advertisement Messages
For each link on which a router provides service as a home agent,
the router maintains a Home Agents List recording information
about all other home agents on that link. This list is used in
the dynamic home agent address discovery mechanism, described in
Section 10.9. The information for the list is learned through
receipt of the periodic unsolicited multicast Router Advertisements,
in a manner similar to the Default Router List conceptual data
structure maintained by each host for Neighbor Discovery [12]. In
the construction of the Home Agents List, the Router Advertisements
are from each other home agent on the link, and the Home Agent (H)
bit is set in them.
On receipt of a valid Router Advertisement, as defined in the
processing algorithm specified for Neighbor Discovery [12], the home
agent performs the following steps, in addition to any steps already
required of it by Neighbor Discovery:
- If the Home Agent (H) bit in the Router Advertisement is not set,
check to see if the sending node has an entry in the current Home
Agents List. If it does, delete the corresponding entry. In any
case all of the following steps are skipped.
- Otherwise, extract the Source Address from the IP header of the
Router Advertisement. This is the link-local IP address on this
link of the home agent sending this Advertisement [12].
- Determine from the Router Advertisement the preference for this
home agent. If the Router Advertisement contains a Home Agent
Information Option, then the preference is taken from the Home
Agent Preference field in the option; otherwise, the default
preference of 0 MUST be used.
- Determine from the Router Advertisement the lifetime for
this home agent. If the Router Advertisement contains a Home
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 84]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Agent Information Option, then the lifetime is taken from
the Home Agent Lifetime field in the option; otherwise, the
lifetime specified by the Router Lifetime field in the Router
Advertisement SHOULD be used.
- If the link-local address of the home agent sending this
Advertisement is already present in this home agent's Home
Agents List and the received home agent lifetime value is zero,
immediately delete this entry in the Home Agents List.
- Otherwise, if the link-local address of the home agent sending
this Advertisement is already present in the receiving home
agent's Home Agents List, reset its lifetime and preference to
the values determined above.
- If the link-local address of the home agent sending this
Advertisement, as determined above, is not already present in
the Home Agents List maintained by the receiving home agent, and
the lifetime for the sending home agent, as determined above,
is non-zero, create a new entry in the list, and initialize its
lifetime and preference to the values determined above.
- If the Home Agents List entry for the link-local address of
the home agent sending this Advertisement was not deleted as
described above, determine any global address(es) of the home
agent based on each Prefix Information option received in
this Advertisement in which the Router Address (R) bit is set
(Section 7.2). For each such global address determined from this
Advertisement, add this global address to the list of global
addresses for this home agent in this Home Agents List entry.
A home agent SHOULD maintain an entry in its Home Agents List for
each such valid home agent address until that entry's lifetime
expires, after which time the entry MUST be deleted.
10.9. Dynamic Home Agent Address Discovery
A mobile node, while away from home, MAY use the dynamic home agent
address discovery mechanism in section 11.3.2 to attempt to discover
the address of one or more routers serving as home agents on its home
link. This discovery might become necessary, for example, if some
nodes on its home link have been reconfigured while the mobile node
has been away from home, such that the router that was operating as
the mobile node's home agent has been replaced by a different router
serving this role.
As described in Section 11.3.2, a mobile node attempts dynamic
home agent address discovery by sending an ICMP Home Agent Address
Discovery Request message to the "Mobile IPv6 Home-Agents" anycast
address [16] for its home IP subnet prefix, using its care-of address
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 85]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
as the Source Address of the packet. A home agent receiving such a
Home Agent Address Discovery Request message that is serving this
subnet (the home agent is configured with this anycast address on one
of its network interfaces) SHOULD return an ICMP Home Agent Address
Discovery Reply message to the mobile node (at its care-of address
that was used as the Source Address of the Request message), with the
Source Address of the Reply packet set to one of the global unicast
addresses of the home agent. The Home Agent Addresses field in the
Reply message is constructed as follows:
- The Home Agent Addresses field SHOULD contain one global IP
address for each home agent currently listed in this home
agent's own Home Agents List (Section 4.5). However, if this
home agent's own global IP address would be placed in the list
(as described below) as the first entry in the list, then this
home agent SHOULD NOT include its own address in the Home Agent
Addresses field in the Reply message. Not placing this home
agent's own IP address in the list will cause the receiving
mobile node to consider this home agent as the most preferred
home agent; otherwise, this home agent will be considered to be
preferred in its order given by its place in the list returned.
- The IP addresses in the Home Agent Addresses field SHOULD be
listed in order of decreasing preference value, based either
on the respective advertised preference from a Home Agent
Information option or on the default preference of 0 if no
preference is advertised (or on the configured home agent
preference for this home agent itself). The home agent with
the highest preference SHOULD be listed first in the Home Agent
Addresses field, and the home agent with the lowest preference
SHOULD be listed last.
- Among home agents with equal preference, their IP addresses
in the Home Agent Addresses field SHOULD be listed in an
order randomized with respect to other home agents with equal
preference, each time a Home Agent Address Discovery Reply
message is returned by this home agent.
- For each entry in this home agent's Home Agents List, if more
than one global IP address is associated with this list entry,
then one of these global IP addresses SHOULD be selected
to include in the Home Agent Addresses field in the Reply
message. As described in Section 4.5, one Home Agents List
entry, identified by the home agent's link-local address,
exists for each home agent on the link; associated with that
list entry is one or more global IP addresses for this home
agent, learned through Prefix Information options with the
Router Address (R) bit is set, received in Router Advertisements
from this link-local address.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 86]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
The selected global IP address for each home agent to include in
forming the Home Agent Addresses field in the Reply message MUST
be the global IP address of the respective home agent sharing a
prefix with the Destination IP address of the Request message;
if no such global IP address is known for some home agent, an
entry for that home agent MUST NOT be included in the Home Agent
Addresses field in the Reply message.
- In order to avoid the possibility of the Reply message packet
being fragmented (or rejected by an intermediate router with an
ICMP Packet Too Big message [14]), if the resulting total packet
size containing the complete list of home agents in the Home
Agent Addresses field would exceed the minimum IPv6 MTU [11], the
home agent SHOULD reduce the number of home agent IP addresses
returned in the packet to the number of addresses that will fit
without exceeding this limit. The home agent addresses returned
in the packet SHOULD be those from the complete list with the
highest preference.
10.9.1. Aggregate List of Home Network Prefixes
IPv6 provides mechanisms for node configuration when it turns on,
and in renumbering a subnet, such as when a site switches to a new
network service provider. These mechanisms are a part of Neighbor
Discovery [12] and Address Autoconfiguration [13].
In renumbering, new prefixes and addresses can be introduced for the
subnet and old ones can be deprecated and removed. These mechanisms
are defined to work while all nodes using the old prefixes are at
home, connected to the link using these prefixes. Mobile IPv6
extends these mechanisms to work also with mobile nodes that are away
from home when the renumbering takes place.
Mobile IPv6 arranges to propagate relevant prefix information to the
mobile node when it is away from home, so that it may be used in
mobile node home address configuration, and in network renumbering.
In this mechanism, mobile nodes away from home receive Mobile Prefix
Advertisements messages with Prefix Information Options, which give
the valid lifetime and preferred lifetime for available prefixes on
the home link.
To avoid possible security attacks from forged Mobile Prefix
Advertisements all such Advertisements MUST be authenticated to the
mobile node by its home agent using IPsec [4, 5, 6].
A mobile node on a remote network SHOULD autoconfigure all of the
global IP addresses, which it would autoconfigure if it were attached
to its home network, from network prefixes representing network
addresses that are served by home agents. Site-local addresses MAY
be autoconfigured if the mobile node is roaming in a network on the
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 87]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
same site as its home addresses. Site-local addresses and addresses
not served by a home agent MUST NOT be autoconfigured, since they are
unusable in the remote network.
To support this, the home agent monitors prefixes advertised by
itself and other home agents routers on the home link, and passes
this aggregated list of relevant subnet prefixes on to the mobile
node in Mobile Prefix Advertisements.
The home agent SHOULD construct the aggregate list of home subnet
prefixes as follows:
- Copy prefix information defined in the home agent's AdvPrefixList
on the home subnet's interfaces to the aggregate list. Also
apply any changes made to the AdvPrefixList on the home agent to
the aggregate list.
- Check valid prefixes received in Router Advertisements
from the home network for consistency with the home agent's
AdvPrefixList, as specified in section 6.2.7 of RFC 2461
(Neighbor Discovery [12]). Do not update the aggregate list with
any information from received prefixes that fail this check.
- Check Router Advertisements which contain an `H' bit (from other
home agents) for valid prefixes that are not yet in the aggregate
list, and if they are usable for autoconfiguration (`A' bit set,
and prefix length is valid for address autoconfiguration on the
home subnet) add them and preserve the `L' flag value. Clear the
`R' flag and zero the interface-id portion of the prefix field
to prevent mobile nodes from treating another router's interface
address as belonging to the home agent. Treat the lifetimes
of these prefixes as decrementing in real time, as defined in
section 6.2.7 of RFC 2461 [12].
- Do not perform consistency checks on valid prefixes received in
Router Advertisements on the home network that do not exist in
the home agent's AdvPrefixList. Instead, if the prefixes already
exist in the aggregate list, update the prefix lifetime fields in
the aggregate list according to the rules specified for hosts in
section 6.3.4 of RFC 2461 (Neighbor Discovery [12]) and section
5.5.3 of RFC 2462 (Stateless Address Autoconfiguration [13]).
- If the L flag is set on valid prefixes received in a Router
Advertisement, and that prefix already exists in the aggregate
list, set the flag in the aggregate list. Ignore the flag if it
is clear.
- Delete prefixes from the aggregate list when their valid
lifetimes expire.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 88]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
The home agent uses the information in the aggregate list to
construct Mobile Prefix Advertisements. It may be possible to
construct an aggregate list by combining information contained in the
home agent's AdvPrefixList and its Home Agents List used for Dynamic
Home Agent Address Discovery (Section 11.3.2).
10.9.2. Scheduling Prefix Deliveries to the Mobile Node
A home agent serving a mobile node will schedule the delivery of new
prefix information to that mobile node when any of the following
conditions occur:
MUST:
- The valid or preferred lifetime or the state of the flags changes
for the prefix of the mobile node's registered home address.
- The mobile node requests the information with a Mobile Prefix
Solicitation (see section 11.3.3).
MAY:
- A new prefix is added to the aggregate list.
- The valid or preferred lifetime or the state of the flags changes
for a prefix which is not used in any binding cache entry for
this mobile node.
The home agent uses the following algorithm to determine when to send
prefix information to the mobile node.
- If the mobile node has not received the prefix information within
the last HomeRtrAdvInterval seconds, then transmit the prefix
information. This MAY be done according to a periodically
scheduled transmission.
- If a mobile node sends a solicitation, answer right away.
- If a prefix in the aggregate list that matches the mobile node's
home registration is added, or if its information changes in
any way that does not cause the mobile node's address to go
deprecated, ensure that a transmission is scheduled (as described
below), and calculate RAND_ADV_DELAY in order to randomize the
time at which the transmission is scheduled.
- If a home registration expires, cancel any scheduled
advertisements to the mobile node.
Suppose that the home agent already has scheduled the transmission
of a Router Advertisement to the mobile node. Then add the data
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 89]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
from the existing scheduled transmission to the newly scheduled
transmission, deleting the previously scheduled transmission event.
In this case, the home agent does not perform the following algorithm
to schedule an advertisement to the mobile node.
Otherwise, the home agent uses the following algorithm to compute
a fresh value for RAND_ADV_DELAY, the offset from the current time
for the scheduled transmission. The computation is expected to
alleviate bursts of advertisements when prefix information changes.
In addition, a home agent MAY further reduce the rate of packet
transmission by further delaying individual advertisements, if needed
to avoid overwhelming local network resources.
Calculate the maximum delay for the scheduled Advertisment as
follows.
MAX_SCHEDULE_DELAY == min (MAX_PFX_ADV_DELAY, Preferred Lifetime)
Then compute RAND_ADV_DELAY ==
MinRtrAdvInt + rand()*(MAX_SCHEDULE_DELAY - MinRtrAdvInt)
The home agent SHOULD periodically continue to retransmit an
unsolicited Advertisement to the mobile node, either until it is
acknowledged by the receipt from the mobile node of a Binding Update
with a home address matching the new home prefix in the packet,
or until the home agent receives a Mobile Prefix Solicitation
from the mobile node. The home agent MUST wait PREFIX_ADV_TIMEOUT
before the first retransmission, and double the retransmission wait
time for every succeeding retransmission, up until a maximum of
PREFIX_ADV_RETRIES attempts. If the mobile node's bindings expire
before the matching Binding Update has been received, then the home
agent MUST NOT attempt any more retransmissions, even if not all
PREFIX_ADV_RETRIES have been retransmitted. After another Binding
Update is received from the mobile node, and if the mobile node has
not returned to the home network in the meantime, the home agent
SHOULD begin the process again of transmitting the unsolicited
Advertisement.
If while the home agent is still retransmitting a Mobile Prefix
Advertisement to the mobile node, another condition as described
above occurs on the home link causing another Prefix Advertisement to
be sent to the mobile node, the home agent SHOULD combine any Prefix
Information options in the unacknowledged Mobile Prefix Advertisement
into the new Advertisement, discard the old Advertisement, and then
begin retransmitting the new one. according to the above algorithm.
10.9.3. Sending Advertisements to the Mobile Node
When sending a Mobile Prefix Advertisement to the mobile node, the
home agent MUST construct the packet as follows:
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 90]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- The Source Address in the packet's IPv6 header MUST be set to
the home agent's IP address to which the mobile node addressed
its current home registration, or its default global home agent
address if no binding exists.
- If a security association exists with the mobile node's address,
the packet MUST be protected by IPsec [4, 5, 6] to guard against
malicious Mobile Prefix Advertisements. The IPsec protection
MUST provide sender authentication and data integrity protection
covering the Mobile Prefix Advertisement, and MAY provide replay
protection.
- If the advertisement was solicited, it MUST be authenticated and
destined to the source address of the solicitation. If it was
triggered by prefix changes or renumbering, the advertisement's
destination will be the mobile node's home address in the binding
which triggered the rule.
- The packet MUST be sent as any other unicast IPv6 packet. If a
care-of address is used, the packet will be delivered directly.
If a binding exists, the home agent will send the packet with
a routing header containing the care-of address, as any other
packet sent to the mobile node originated by the home agent
(rather than using IPv6 encapsulation, as would be used by the
home agent for intercepted packets).
10.9.4. Lifetimes for Changed Prefixes
As described in Section 10.2, the lifetime returned by the home agent
in a Binding Acknowledgement MUST be no greater than the remaining
valid lifetime for the subnet prefix in the mobile node's home
address. This limit on the binding lifetime serves to prohibit use
of a mobile node's home address after it becomes invalid.
11. Mobile Node Operation
11.1. Conceptual Data Structures
Each mobile node MUST maintain a Binding Update List and Home Agents
List.
The rules for maintaining a Home Agents List are same for home agents
and correspondent nodes, and have been described in Section 10.1.
The Binding Update List records information for each Binding Update
sent by this mobile node, for which the Lifetime sent in that Binding
Update has not yet expired. The Binding Update List includes all
bindings sent by the mobile node: those to correspondent nodes,
those to the mobile node's home agent, and those to a home agent
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 91]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
on the link on which the mobile node's previous care-of address is
located. It also contains Binding Updates which are waiting for
the completion of the return routability procedure before they can
be sent. However, for multiple Binding Updates sent to the same
destination address, the Binding Update List contains only the most
recent Binding Update (i.e., with the greatest Sequence Number value)
sent to that destination. The Binding Update List MAY be implemented
in any manner consistent with the external behavior described in this
document.
Each Binding Update List entry conceptually contains the following
fields:
- The IP address of the node to which a Binding Update was sent.
If the Binding Update was successfully received by that node
(e.g., not lost by the network), a Binding Cache entry may have
been created or updated based on this Binding Update. The
Binding Cache entry may still exist, if that node has not deleted
the entry before its expiration (e.g., to reclaim space in its
Binding Cache for other entries).
- The home address for which that Binding Update was sent. This
will be one of the following:
* one the mobile node's home addresses for typical Binding
Updates (Sections 11.6.1 and 11.6.2), or
* the mobile node's previous care-of address for Binding
Updates sent to establish forwarding from the mobile node's
previous location (Section 11.6.6).
- The care-of address sent in that Binding Update. This value
is necessary for the mobile node to determine if it has sent a
Binding Update giving its new care-of address to this destination
after changing its care-of address.
- The initial value of the Lifetime field sent in that Binding
Update.
- The remaining lifetime of that binding. This lifetime is
initialized from the Lifetime value sent in the Binding Update
and is decremented until it reaches zero, at which time this
entry MUST be deleted from the Binding Update List.
- The maximum value of the Sequence Number field sent in previous
Binding Updates to this destination. The Sequence Number field
is 16 bits long, and all comparisons between Sequence Number
values MUST be performed modulo 2**15 in the manner explained
already in Section 9.4.1.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 92]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- The time at which a Binding Update was last sent to this
destination, as needed to implement the rate limiting restriction
for sending Binding Updates.
- The state of any retransmissions needed for this Binding Update,
if the Acknowledge (A) bit was set in this Binding Update. This
state includes the time remaining until the next retransmission
attempt for the Binding Update, and the current state of the
exponential back-off mechanism for retransmissions.
- A flag that, when set, indicates that future Binding Updates
should not be sent to this destination. The mobile node sets
this flag in the Binding Update List entry when it receives an
ICMP Parameter Problem, Code 1, error message in response to
a return routability message or Binding Update sent to that
destination, as described in Section 11.7.
The Binding Update list also conceptually contains data related to
running the return routability procedure. This data is relevant only
for Binding Updates sent to correspondent nodes.
- The time at which a Home Test Init or Care-of Test Init message
was last sent to this destination, as needed to implement the
rate limiting restriction for the return routability procedure.
- The state of any retransmissions needed for this return
routability procedure. This state includes the time remaining
until the next retransmission attempt and the current state of
the exponential back-off mechanism for retransmissions.
- Mobile cookie values used the Home Test Init and Care-of Test
Init messages.
- Home and care-of cookies received from the correspondent node.
- Home and care-of nonce indices received from the correspondent
node.
- The time at which each of the cookies was received from this
correspondent node, as needed to implement cookie reuse while
moving.
11.2. Packet Processing
11.2.1. Sending Packets While Away from Home
While a mobile node is away from home, it continues to use its home
address, as well as also using one or more care-of addresses. When
sending a packet while away from home, a mobile node MAY choose among
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 93]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
these in selecting the address that it will use as the source of the
packet, as follows:
- Protocols layered over IP will generally treat the mobile node's
home address as its IP address for most packets. For packets
sent that are part of transport-level connections established
while the mobile node was at home, the mobile node MUST use
its home address. Likewise, for packets sent that are part of
transport-level connections that the mobile node may still be
using after moving to a new location, the mobile node SHOULD
use its home address in this way. When sending such packets,
the delivery method depends on whether a binding exists with
the correspondent node. If a binding exists, the mobile node
SHOULD send the packets directly to the correspondent node.
Otherwise, if a binding does not exist, the mobile node MUST use
reverse tunneling. Detailed operation for both of these cases is
described later in this section.
- For short-term communication, particularly for communication that
may easily be retried if it fails, the mobile node MAY choose
to directly use one of its care-of addresses as the source of
the packet, thus not requiring the use of a Home Address option
in the packet. An example of this type of communication might
be DNS queries sent by the mobile node [27, 28]. Using the
mobile node's care-of address as the source for such queries will
generally have a lower overhead than using the mobile node's
home address, since no extra options need be used in either the
query or its reply, and all packets can be routed normally,
directly between their source and destination without relying
on Mobile IP. If the mobile node has no particular knowledge
that the communication being sent fits within this general type
of communication, however, the mobile node SHOULD NOT use its
care-of address as the source of the packet in this way.
For packets sent by a mobile node while it is at home, no special
Mobile IP processing is required for sending this packet. Likewise,
if the mobile node uses any address other than any of its home
addresses as the source of a packet sent while away from home no
special Mobile IP processing is required for sending that packet. In
each case, the packet is simply addressed and transmitted in the same
way as any normal IPv6 packet.
For packets sent by the mobile node sent while away from home using
the mobile node's home address as the source, special Mobile IP
processing of the packet is required. This can be done in two ways,
as described above. These ways are:
direct delivery
This is manner of delivering packets does not require going
through the home network, and typically will enable faster and
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 94]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
more reliable transmission. A mobile node SHOULD arrange to
supply the home address in a Home Address option, and allowing
the IPv6 header's Source Address field to be set to one of the
mobile node's care-of addresses; the correspondent node will
then use the address supplied in the Home Address option to
serve the function traditionally done by the Source IP address
in the IPv6 header. the mobile node's home address is then
supplied to higher protocol layers and applications.
Specifically:
- Construct the packet using the mobile node's home address
as the packet's Source Address, in the same way as if the
mobile node were at home.
- Insert a Home Address option into the packet, with the Home
Address field copied from the original value of the Source
Address field in the packet.
- Change the Source Address field in the packet's IPv6 header
to one of the mobile node's care-of addresses. This will
typically be the mobile node's current primary care-of
address, but MUST be a care-of address with a subnet prefix
that is on-link on the network interface on which the
mobile node will transmit the packet.
By using the care-of address as the Source Address in the IPv6
header, with the mobile node's home address instead in the Home
Address option, the packet will be able to safely pass through
any router implementing ingress filtering [24].
reverse tunneling
This is the mechanism which tunnels the packets via the home
agent. It isn't as efficient as the above mechanism, but is
needed if there is no binding yet with the correspondent node.
Specifically:
- The packet is sent to the home agent using IPv6
encapsulation [15].
- The Source Address in the tunnel packet is the primary
care-of address as registered with the home agent.
- The Destination Address in the tunnel packet is the home
agent's address.
Reverse tunneled packets MAY be protected using a AH or ESP
header, depending on the security policies used by the home
agent. The support for encrypted reverse tunneling allows
mobile nodes to defeat certain kinds of traffic analysis, and
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 95]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
provides a mechanism by which routers on the home network can
distinguish authorized traffic from other possibly malicious
traffic.
11.2.2. Interaction with Outbound IPsec Processing
This section sketches the interaction between outbound Mobile
IP processing and outbound IP Security (IPsec) processing for
packets sent by a mobile node while away from home. Any specific
implementation MAY use algorithms and data structures other than
those suggested here, but its processing MUST be consistent with the
effect of the operation described here and with the relevant IPsec
specifications. In the steps described below, it is assumed that
IPsec is being used in transport mode [4] and that the mobile node is
using its home address as the source for the packet (from the point
of view of higher protocol layers or applications, as described in
Section 11.2.1):
- The packet is created by higher layer protocols and applications
(e.g., by TCP) as if the mobile node were at home and Mobile IP
were not being used.
- As part of outbound packet processing in IP, the packet is
compared against the IPsec security policy database to determine
what processing is required for the packet [4].
- If IPsec processing is required, the packet is either mapped to
an existing Security Association (or SA bundle), or a new SA (or
SA bundle) is created for the packet, according to the procedures
defined for IPsec.
- Since the mobile node is away from home, the mobile is either
using reverse tunneling or route optimization to reach the
correspondent node.
If reverse tunneling is used, the packet is constructed in the
normal manner and then tunneled through the home agent.
If route optimization is in use, the mobile node inserts a Home
Address destination option into the packet, replacing the Source
Address in the packet's IP header with a care-of address suitable
for the link on which the packet is being sent, as described in
Section 11.2.1. The Destination Options header in which the
Home Address destination option is inserted MUST appear in the
packet after the Routing Header, if present, and before the IPsec
(AH [5] or ESP [6]) header, so that the Home Address destination
option is processed by the destination node before the IPsec
header is processed.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 96]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Finally, once the packet is fully assembled, the necessary IPsec
authentication (and encryption, if required) processing is
performed on the packet, initializing the Authentication Data in
the IPsec header. The AH authentication data MUST be calculated
as if the following were true:
* the IPv6 source address in the IPv6 header contains the
mobile node's home address,
* the Home Address field of the Home Address destination option
(section 6.3) contains the new care-of address.
- This allows, but does not require, the receiver of the packet
containing a Home Address destination option to exchange the two
fields of the incoming packet, simplifying processing for all
subsequent packet headers. However, such an exchange is not
required, as long as the result of the authentication calculation
remains the same.
In addition, when using any automated key management protocol [4]
(such as IKE [9]) to create a new SA (or SA bundle) while away from
home, a mobile node MUST take special care in its processing of the
key management protocol. Otherwise, other nodes with which the
mobile node must communicate as part of the automated key management
protocol processing may be unable to correctly deliver packets to
the mobile node if they and/or the mobile node's home agent do
not then have a current Binding Cache entry for the mobile node.
For the default case of using IKE as the automated key management
protocol [9, 4], such problems can be avoided by the following
requirements on the use of IKE by a mobile node while away from home:
- The mobile node MUST use its care-of address as the Source
Address of all packets it sends as part of the key management
protocol (without use of Mobile IP for these packets, as
suggested in Section 11.2.1).
- In addition, for all security associations bound to the mobile
node's home address established by way of IKE, the mobile node
MUST include an ISAKMP Identification Payload [8] in the IKE
exchange, giving the mobile node's home address as the initiator
of the Security Association [7].
11.2.3. Receiving Packets While Away from Home
While away from home, a mobile node will receive packets addressed to
its home address, by one of three methods:
- Packets sent by a correspondent node that does not have a Binding
Cache entry for the mobile node, will be tunneled to the mobile
node via its home agent.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 97]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- Packets sent by a correspondent node that has a Binding Cache
entry for the mobile node that contains the mobile node's current
care-of address, will be sent by the correspondent node using
a type 2 Routing header. The packet will be addressed to the
mobile node's care-of address, with the final hop in the Routing
header directing the packet to the mobile node's home address;
the processing of this last hop of the Routing header is entirely
internal to the mobile node, since the care-of address and home
address are both addresses within the mobile node.
- Packets sent by a correspondent node that has a Binding
Cache entry for the mobile node that contains an out-of-date
care-of address for the mobile node, will also be sent by the
correspondent node using a type 2 Routing header, as described
above. If the mobile node sent a Binding Update to a home agent
on the link on which its previous care-of address is located
(Section 11.6.6), and if this home agent is still serving as a
home agent for the mobile node's previous care-of address, then
such a packet will be delivered to the mobile node via this home
agent.
For packets received by the first of these methods, the mobile node
MUST check that the IPv6 source address of the tunnel packet is the
IP address of its home agent.
For packets received by either the first or last of these three
methods, the mobile node SHOULD send a Binding Update to the original
sender of the packet, as described in Section 11.6.2, subject to
the rate limiting defined in Section 11.6.9. The mobile node MUST
also process the received packet in the manner defined for IPv6
encapsulation [15], which will result in the encapsulated (inner)
packet being processed normally by upper-layer protocols within the
mobile node, as if it had been addressed (only) to the mobile node's
home address.
For packets received by the second method above (using a Type 2
Routing header), the following rules will result in the packet being
processed normally by upper-layer protocols within the mobile node,
as if it had been addressed to the mobile node's home address.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 98]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
A node receiving a packet addressed to itself (i.e., one of the
node's addresses is in the IPv6 destination field) follows the next
header chain of headers and processes them. When it encounters
a Type 2 Routing header during this processing it performs the
following checks. If any of these checks fail the node MUST silently
discard the packet.
- The length field in the RH is exactly 2.
- The segments left field in the RH is either 0 or 1. (Values on
the wire are always 1. But implementations may process RH in a
manner the value may become 0 after RH has been processed, but
before the rest of the packet is processed.)
- The Home Address field in the RH is one of the node's home
addresses, if the segments left field was 1.
Once the above checks have been performed, the node swaps the IPv6
destination field with the Home Address field in the RH, decrements
segments left, and resubmits the packet to IP for processing the
next header. Conceptually this follows the same model as in RFC
2460. However, in the case of Type 2 Routing header this can be
simplified since it is known that the packet will not be forwarded to
a different node.
The definition of AH requires the sender to calculate the AH
integrity check value of a routing header in a way as it appears in
the receiver after it has processed the header. Since IPsec headers
follow the Routing Header, any IPsec processing will operate on
the packet with the home address in the IP destination field and
segments left being zero. Thus, the AH calculations at the sender
and receiver will have an identical view of the packet.
11.2.4. Routing Multicast Packets
A mobile node that is connected to its home link functions in the
same way as any other (stationary) node. Thus, when it is at home,
a mobile node functions identically to other multicast senders and
receivers. This section therefore describes the behavior of a mobile
node that is not on its home link.
In order to receive packets sent to some multicast group, a mobile
node must join that multicast group. One method by which a mobile
node MAY join the group is via a (local) multicast router on the
foreign link being visited. The mobile node SHOULD use one of its
care-of addresses that shares a subnet prefix with the multicast
router, as the source IPv6 address of its multicast group membership
control messages. If the multicast applications depend on the
address of the joining node, the mobile node MAY treat the router as
a correspondent node and establish a binding with it. The mobile
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 99]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
node can then use the Home Address destination option in the sent
control messages.
Alternatively, a mobile node MAY join multicast groups via a
bi-directional tunnel to its home agent. The mobile node tunnels its
multicast group membership control packets to its home agent, and the
home agent forwards multicast packets down the tunnel to the mobile
node.
A mobile node that wishes to send packets to a multicast group
also has two options: (1) send directly on the foreign link being
visited; or (2) send via a tunnel to its home agent. Because
multicast routing in general depends upon the Source Address used in
the IPv6 header of the multicast packet, a mobile node that tunnels a
multicast packet to its home agent MUST use its home address as the
IPv6 Source Address of the inner multicast packet.
11.3. Home Agent and Prefix Management
11.3.1. Receiving Local Router Advertisement Messages
Each mobile node maintains a Home Agents List recording information
about all home agents from which it receives a Router Advertisement,
for which the home agent lifetime indicated in that Router
Advertisement has not yet expired. This list is used by the mobile
node to enable it to send a Binding Update to the global unicast
address of a home agent on its previous link when it moves to a new
link, as described in Section 11.6.6. On receipt of a valid Router
Advertisement, as defined in the processing algorithm specified for
Neighbor Discovery [12], the mobile node performs the following
steps, in addition to any steps already required of it by Neighbor
Discovery.
- If the Home Agent (H) bit in the Router Advertisement is not set,
and the sending node currently has an entry in the node's Home
Agents List, delete the corresponding entry. Subsequently, skip
all of the following steps.
- Otherwise, extract the Source Address from the IP header of the
Router Advertisement. This is the link-local IP address on this
link of the home agent sending this Advertisement [12].
- Determine from the Router Advertisement the preference for this
home agent. If the Router Advertisement contains a Home Agent
Information Option, then the preference is taken from the Home
Agent Preference field in the option; otherwise, the default
preference of 0 MUST be used.
- Determine from the Router Advertisement the lifetime for
this home agent. If the Router Advertisement contains a Home
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 100]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Agent Information Option, then the lifetime is taken from
the Home Agent Lifetime field in the option; otherwise, the
lifetime specified by the Router Lifetime field in the Router
Advertisement SHOULD be used.
- If the link-local address of the home agent sending this
Advertisement is already present in this mobile node's Home
Agents List and the received home agent lifetime value is zero,
immediately delete this entry in the Home Agents List.
- Otherwise, if the link-local address of the home agent sending
this Advertisement is already present in the receiving mobile
node's Home Agents List, reset its lifetime and preference to the
values determined above.
- If the link-local address of the home agent sending this
Advertisement, as determined above, is not already present in the
Home Agents List maintained by the receiving mobile node, and
the lifetime for the sending home agent, as determined above,
is non-zero, create a new entry in the list, and initialize its
lifetime and preference to the values determined above.
- If the Home Agents List entry for the link-local address of
the home agent sending this Advertisement was not deleted as
described above, determine any global address(es) of the home
agent based on each Prefix Information option received in
this Advertisement in which the Router Address (R) bit is set
(Section 7.2). For each such global address determined from this
Advertisement, add this global address to the list of global
addresses for this home agent in this Home Agents List entry.
A mobile node SHOULD maintain an entry in its Home Agents List for
each such valid home agent address until that entry's lifetime
expires, after which time the entry MUST be deleted.
11.3.2. Dynamic Home Agent Address Discovery
Sometimes, when the mobile node needs to send a Binding Update to its
home agent to register its new primary care-of address, as described
in Section 11.6.1, the mobile node may not know the address of any
router on its home link that can serve as a home agent for it. For
example, some nodes on its home link may have been reconfigured while
the mobile node has been away from home, such that the router that
was operating as the mobile node's home agent has been replaced by a
different router serving this role.
In this case, the mobile node MAY attempt to discover the address of
a suitable home agent on its home link. To do so, the mobile node
sends an ICMP Home Agent Address Discovery Request message to the
"Mobile IPv6 Home-Agents" anycast address [16] for its home subnet
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 101]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
prefix. As described in Section 10.9, the home agent on its home
link that receives this Request message will return an ICMP Home
Agent Address Discovery Reply message, giving this home agent's own
global unicast IP address along with a list of the global unicast IP
address of each other home agent operating on the home link.
The mobile node, upon receiving this Home Agent Address Discovery
Reply message, MAY then send its home registration Binding Update to
the home agent address given as the IP Source Address of the packet
carrying the Reply message or to any of the unicast IP addresses
listed in the Home Agent Addresses field in the Reply. For example,
if necessary, the mobile node MAY attempt its home registration
with each of these home agents, in turn, by sending each a Binding
Update and waiting for the matching Binding Acknowledgement, until
its registration is accepted by one of these home agents. In trying
each of the returned home agent addresses, the mobile node SHOULD try
each in the order listed in the Home Agent Addresses field in the
received Home Agent Address Discovery Reply message. If the home
agent identified by the Source Address field in the IP header of the
packet carrying the Home Agent Address Discovery Reply message is
not listed in the Home Agent Addresses field in the Reply, it SHOULD
be tried before the first address given in the list; otherwise, it
SHOULD be tried in its listed order.
If the mobile node has a current registration with some home agent
on its home link (the Lifetime for that registration has not yet
expired), then the mobile node MUST attempt any new registration
first with that home agent. If that registration attempt fails
(e.g., times out or is rejected), the mobile node SHOULD then
reattempt this registration with another home agent on its home link.
If the mobile node knows of no other suitable home agent, then it MAY
attempt the dynamic home agent address discovery mechanism described
above.
If, after a mobile node transmits a Home Agent Address Discovery
Request message to the Home Agents Anycast address, it does not
receive a corresponding Home Agent Address Discovery Reply message
within INITIAL_DHAAD_TIMEOUT seconds, the mobile node MAY retransmit
the same Request message to the same anycast address. This
retransmission MAY be repeated up to a maximum of DHAAD_RETRIES
attempts. Each retransmission MUST be delayed by twice the time
interval of the previous retransmission.
11.3.3. Sending Mobile Prefix Solicitations
When a mobile node has a home address that is about to become
invalid, it sends a Mobile Prefix Solicitation to its home agent
in an attempt to acquire fresh routing prefix information. The
new information also enables the mobile node to participate in
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 102]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
renumbering operations affecting the home network, as described in
section 10.9.1.
The mobile node SHOULD send a Solicitation to the home agent when
its home address will become invalid within MaxRtrAdvInterval
seconds, where this value is acquired in a previous Mobile Prefix
Advertisement from the home agent. If no such value is known, the
value MAX_PFX_ADV_DELAY seconds is used instead (see section 12).
This solicitation follows the same retransmission rules specified for
Router Solicitations [12], except that the initial retransmission
interval is specified to be INITIAL_SOLICIT_TIMER (see section 12).
As described in Section 11.6.2, Binding Updates sent by the mobile
node to other nodes MUST use a lifetime no greater than the remaining
lifetime of its home registration of its primary care-of address.
The mobile node SHOULD further limit the lifetimes that it sends on
any Binding Updates to be within the remaining preferred lifetime
(see Section 10.9.2) for the prefix in its home address.
When the lifetime for a changed prefix decreases, and the change
would cause cached bindings at correspondent nodes in the Binding
Update List to be stored past the newly shortened lifetime, the
mobile node MUST issue a Binding Update to all such correspondent
nodes.
These limits on the binding lifetime serve to prohibit use of a
mobile node's home address after it becomes invalid.
11.3.4. Receiving Mobile Prefix Advertisements
Section 10.9.1 describes the operation of a home agent to support
boot time configuration and renumbering a mobile node's home subnet
while the mobile node is away from home. The home agent sends Mobile
Prefix Advertisement messages to the mobile node while away from
home, giving "important" Prefix Information options that describe
changes in the prefixes in use on the mobile node's home link.
When a mobile node receives a Mobile Prefix Advertisement, it MUST
validate it according to the following test:
- The Source Address of the IP packet carrying the Mobile Prefix
Advertisement is the same as the home agent address to which the
mobile node last sent an accepted "home registration" Binding
Update to register its primary care-of address. Otherwise, if
no such registrations have been made, it SHOULD be the mobile
node's stored home agent address, if one exists. Otherwise, if
the mobile node has not yet discovered its home agent's address,
it MUST NOT accept Mobile Prefix Advertisements.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 103]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- The packet MUST be protected by IPsec [4, 5, 6] to guard against
malicious prefix advertisements, if a security association
exists (i.e. unless the mobile node does not yet have a home
address configured). The IPsec protection MUST provide sender
authentication, data integrity protection, and replay protection,
covering the advertisement.
Any received Mobile Prefix Advertisement not meeting this test MUST
be silently discarded. For advertisements that do not contain
a solicitation cookie, the mobile node MAY send a solitication
containing such a cookie before accepting the advertisement for
further processing.
For an accepted Mobile Prefix Advertisement, the mobile node MUST
process the Prefix Information Options as if they arrived in a
Router Advertisement on the mobile node's home link [12]. Such
processing may result in the mobile node configuring a new home
address, although due to separation between preferred lifetime and
valid lifetime, such changes should not affect most communication
by the mobile node, in the same way as for nodes that are at home.
In this case,, the mobile node MUST return a Binding Update, which
will be viewed by the home agent as an acknowledgement of the
corresponding Mobile Prefix Advertisement, which it can cease
transmitting. In addition, if the method used for this new home
address configuration would require the mobile node to perform
Duplicate Address Detection [13] for the new address if the mobile
node were located at home, then the mobile node MUST set the
Duplicate Address Detection (D) bit in this Binding Update to its
home agent, to request the home agent to perform this Duplicate
Address Detection on behalf of the mobile node.
11.4. Movement
11.4.1. Movement Detection
The primary movement detection mechanism for Mobile IPv6 defined
in this section uses the facilities of IPv6 Neighbor Discovery,
including Router Discovery and Neighbor Unreachability Detection.
The mobile node SHOULD supplement this mechanism with other
information whenever it is available to the mobile node (e.g.,
from lower protocol layers). The description here is based on the
conceptual model of the organization and data structures defined by
Neighbor Discovery [12].
Mobile nodes SHOULD use Router Discovery to discover new routers and
on-link subnet prefixes; a mobile node MAY send Router Solicitation
messages, or MAY wait for unsolicited (periodic) multicast Router
Advertisement messages, as specified for Router Discovery [12].
Based on received Router Advertisement messages, a mobile node
maintains an entry in its Default Router List for each router, and
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 104]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
an entry in its Prefix List for each subnet prefix that it currently
considers to be on-link. Each entry in these lists has an associated
invalidation timer value. While away from home, a mobile node
typically selects one default router and one subnet prefix to use
as the subnet prefix in its primary care-of address. A mobile node
MAY also have associated additional care-of addresses, using other
subnet prefixes from its Prefix List. The method by which a mobile
node selects and forms a care-of address from the available subnet
prefixes is described in Section 11.4.2. The mobile node registers
its primary care-of address with its home agent, as described in
Section 11.6.1.
While a mobile node is away from home, it is important for the mobile
node to quickly detect when its default router becomes unreachable.
When this happens, the mobile node SHOULD switch to a new default
router and potentially to a new primary care-of address. If, on the
other hand, the mobile node becomes unreachable from its default
router, it should attempt to become reachable through some other
router. To detect when its default router becomes unreachable, a
mobile node SHOULD use Neighbor Unreachability Detection.
For a mobile node to detect when it has become unreachable from its
default router, the mobile node cannot efficiently rely on Neighbor
Unreachability Detection alone, since the network overhead would
be prohibitively high in many cases. Instead, when a mobile node
receives any IPv6 packets from its current default router at all,
irrespective of the source IPv6 address, it SHOULD use that as an
indication that it is still reachable from the router.
Since the router SHOULD be sending periodic unsolicited multicast
Router Advertisement messages, the mobile node will have frequent
opportunity to check if it is still reachable from its default
router, even in the absence of other packets to it from the router.
If Router Advertisements that the mobile node receives include
an Advertisement Interval option, the mobile node MAY use its
Advertisement Interval field as an indication of the frequency with
which it SHOULD expect to continue to receive future Advertisements
from that router. This field specifies the minimum rate (the maximum
amount of time between successive Advertisements) that the mobile
node SHOULD expect. If this amount of time elapses without the
mobile node receiving any Advertisement from this router, the mobile
node can be sure that at least one Advertisement sent by the router
has been lost. It is thus possible for the mobile node to implement
its own policy for determining the number of Advertisements from
its current default router it is willing to tolerate losing before
deciding to switch to a different router from which it may currently
be correctly receiving Advertisements.
On some types of network interfaces, the mobile node MAY also
supplement this monitoring of Router Advertisements, by setting its
network interface into "promiscuous" receive mode, so that it is able
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 105]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
to receive all packets on the link, including those not addressed to
it at the link layer (i.e., disabling link-level address filtering).
The mobile node will then be able to detect any packets sent by the
router, in order to detect reachability from the router. This use of
promiscuous mode may be useful on very low bandwidth (e.g., wireless)
links, but its use MUST be configurable on the mobile node since it
is likely to consume additional energy resources.
If the above means do not provide indication that the mobile node
is still reachable from its current default router (for instance,
the mobile node receives no packets from the router for a period
of time), then the mobile node SHOULD attempt to actively probe
the router with Neighbor Solicitation messages, even if it is not
otherwise actively sending packets to the router. If it receives a
solicited Neighbor Advertisement message in response from the router,
then the mobile node can deduce that it is still reachable. It is
expected that the mobile node will in most cases be able to determine
its reachability from the router by listening for packets from the
router as described above, and thus, such extra Neighbor Solicitation
probes should rarely be necessary.
With some types of networks, indications about link-layer mobility
might be obtained from lower-layer protocol or device driver software
within the mobile node. However, all link-layer mobility indications
from lower layers do not necessarily indicate a movement of the
mobile node to a new link, such that the mobile node would need to
switch to a new default router and primary care-of address. For
example, movement of a mobile node from one cell to another in many
wireless LANs can be made transparent to the IP level through use of
a link-layer "roaming" protocol, as long as the different wireless
LAN cells all operate as part of the same IP link with the same
subnet prefix. Upon lower-layer indication of link-layer mobility,
the mobile node MAY send Router Solicitation messages to determine if
additional on-link subnet prefixes are available on its new link.
Such lower-layer information might also be useful to a mobile node in
deciding to switch its primary care-of address to one of the other
care-of addresses it has formed from the on-link subnet prefixes
currently available through different routers from which the mobile
node is reachable. For example, a mobile node MAY use signal
strength or signal quality information (with suitable hysteresis) for
its link with the available routers to decide when to switch to a new
primary care-of address using that router rather than its current
default router (and current primary care-of address). Even though
the mobile node's current default router may still be reachable in
terms of Neighbor Unreachability Detection, the mobile node MAY use
such lower-layer information to determine that switching to a new
default router would provide a better connection.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 106]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
11.4.2. Forming New Care-of Addresses
After detecting that it has moved from one link to another (i.e., its
current default router has become unreachable and it has discovered
a new default router), a mobile node SHOULD form a new primary
care-of address using one of the on-link subnet prefixes advertised
by the new router. A mobile node MAY form a new primary care-of
address at any time, except that it MUST NOT do so too frequently.
Specifically, a mobile node MUST NOT send a Binding Update about a
new care-of address to its home agent (which is required to register
the new address as its primary care-of address) more often than once
per MAX_UPDATE_RATE seconds.
In addition, after discovering a new on-link subnet prefix, a mobile
node MAY form a new (non-primary) care-of address using that subnet
prefix, even when it has not switched to a new default router. A
mobile node can have only one primary care-of address at a time
(which is registered with its home agent), but it MAY have an
additional care-of address for any or all of the prefixes on its
current link. Furthermore, since a wireless network interface may
actually allow a mobile node to be reachable on more than one link at
a time (i.e., within wireless transmitter range of routers on more
than one separate link), a mobile node MAY have care-of addresses
on more than one link at a time. The use of more than one care-of
address at a time is described in Section 11.4.3.
As described in Section 4, in order to form a new care-of address,
a mobile node MAY use either stateless [13] or stateful (e.g.,
DHCPv6 [25]) Address Autoconfiguration. If a mobile node needs to
send packets as part of the method of address autoconfiguration,
it MUST use an IPv6 link-local address rather than its own IPv6
home address as the Source Address in the IPv6 header of each such
autoconfiguration packet.
In some cases, a mobile node may already know a (constant) IPv6
address that has been assigned to it for its use only while
visiting a specific foreign link. For example, a mobile node may be
statically configured with an IPv6 address assigned by the system
administrator of some foreign link, for its use while visiting that
link. If so, rather than using Address Autoconfiguration to form a
new care-of address using this subnet prefix, the mobile node MAY use
its own pre-assigned address as its care-of address on this link.
After forming a new care-of address, a mobile node MAY perform
Duplicate Address Detection [13] on that new address to confirm its
uniqueness. However, doing so represents a trade-off between safety
(ensuring that the new address is not used if it is a duplicate
address) and overhead (performing Duplicate Address Detection
requires the sending of one or more additional packets over what
may be, for example, a slow wireless link through which the mobile
node is connected). Performing Duplicate Address Detection also in
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 107]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
general would cause a delay before the mobile node could use the
new care-of address, possibly causing the mobile node to be unable
to continue communication with correspondent nodes for some period
of time. For these reasons, a mobile node, after forming a new
care-of address, MAY begin using the new care-of address without
performing Duplicate Address Detection. Furthermore, the mobile node
MAY continue using the address without performing Duplicate Address
Detection, although it SHOULD in most cases (e.g., unless network
bandwidth or battery consumption for communication is of primary
concern) begin Duplicate Address Detection asynchronously when it
begins use of the address, allowing the Duplicate Address Detection
procedure to complete in parallel with normal communication using the
address.
In addition, normal processing for Duplicate Address Detection
specifies that, in certain cases, the node SHOULD delay sending the
initial Neighbor Solicitation message of Duplicate Address Detection
by a random delay between 0 and MAX_RTR_SOLICITATION_DELAY [12, 13];
however, in this case, the mobile node SHOULD NOT perform such a
delay in its use of Duplicate Address Detection, unless the mobile
node is initializing after rebooting.
11.4.3. Using Multiple Care-of Addresses
As described in Section 11.4.2, a mobile node MAY use more than one
care-of address at a time. Particularly in the case of many wireless
networks, a mobile node effectively might be reachable through
multiple links at the same time (e.g., with overlapping wireless
cells), on which different on-link subnet prefixes may exist. A
mobile node SHOULD select a primary care-of address from among those
care-of addresses it has formed using any of these subnet prefixes,
based on the movement detection mechanism in use, as described in
Section 11.4.1. When the mobile node selects a new primary care-of
address, it MUST register it with its home agent by sending it a
Binding Update with the Home Registration (H) and Acknowledge (A)
bits set, as described in Section 11.6.1.
To assist with smooth handovers, a mobile node SHOULD retain
its previous primary care-of address as a (non-primary) care-of
address, and SHOULD still accept packets at this address, even after
registering its new primary care-of address with its home agent.
This is reasonable, since the mobile node could only receive packets
at its previous primary care-of address if it were indeed still
connected to that link. If the previous primary care-of address was
allocated using stateful Address Autoconfiguration [25], the mobile
node may not wish to release the address immediately upon switching
to a new primary care-of address.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 108]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
11.5. Return Routability Procedure
This section defines the rules that the mobile node must follow
when performing the return routability procedure. Appendix A
specifies also a (non-normative) state-machine that describes the
same procedure. Section 11.6.2 describes the rules when the return
routability procedure needs to be initiated.
11.5.1. Sending Home and Care-of Test Init Messages
A mobile node that initiates a return routability procedure MUST
send (in parallel) a Home Test Init message and a Care-of Test Init
messages. A Home Test Init message MUST be created as described
in Section 6.1.3. A Care-of Test Init message MUST be created as
described in Section 6.1.4.
When sending a Home Test Init or Care-of Test Init message the mobile
node MUST record in its Binding Update List the following fields from
the messages:
- The IP address of the node to which the message was sent.
- The home address for which the binding is desired. This value
will appear in the Source Address field of the Home Test Init
message.
- The time at which each of these messages was sent.
- The mobile cookie used in the messages.
11.5.2. Receiving Return Routability Messages
Upon receiving a packet carrying a Home Test message, a mobile node
MUST validate the packet according to the following tests:
- The Header Len field in the Mobility Header is greater than or
equal to the length specified in Section 6.1.5.
- The Source Address of the packet belongs to a correspondent
node for which the mobile node has a Binding Update List entry
with a state indicating that return routability procedure is in
progress.
- The Binding Update List indicates that no home cookie has been
received yet.
- The Destination Address of the packet has the home address of the
mobile node, and the packet has been received in a tunnel from
the home agent.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 109]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- The Mobile Cookie field in the message matches the value stored
in the Binding Update List.
Any Home Test message not satisfying all of these tests MUST be
silently ignored. Otherwise, the mobile node MUST record the Home
Nonce Index and Home Cookie in the Binding Update List. If the
Binding Update List entry does not have a Care-of Cookie, the mobile
node SHOULD continue waiting for additional messages.
Upon receiving a packet carrying a Care-of Test message, a mobile
node MUST validate the packet according to the following tests:
- The Header Len field in the Mobility Header is greater than or
equal to the length specified in Section 6.1.6.
- The Source Address of the packet belongs to a correspondent
node for which the mobile node has a Binding Update List entry
with a state indicating that return routability procedure is in
progress.
- The Binding Update List indicates that no care-of cookie has been
received yet.
- The Destination Address of the packet is the current care-of
address of the mobile node.
- The Mobile Cookie field in the message matches the value stored
in the Binding Update List.
Any Care-of Test message not satisfying all of these tests MUST be
silently ignored. Otherwise, the mobile node MUST record the Care-of
Nonce Index and Care-of Cookie in the Binding Update List. If the
Binding Update List entry does not have a Home Cookie, the mobile
node SHOULD continue waiting for additional messages.
If after receiving either the Home Test or the Care-of Test message
and performing the above actions, the Binding Update List entry
has both the Home and the Care-of Cookies, the return routability
procedure is complete. The mobile node SHOULD then proceed with
sending a Binding Update message as described in Section 11.6.2.
Correspondent nodes from the time before this specification was
published may not not support the Mobility Header protocol. These
nodes will respond to Home Test Init and Care-of Test Init messages
with an ICMP Parameter Problem code 1. The mobile node SHOULD
take such messages as an indication that the correspondent node
can not provide route optimization, and revert back to the use of
bidirectional routing.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 110]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
11.5.3. Retransmitting in the Return Routability Procedure
The mobile node is responsible for retransmissions in the return
routability procedure.
When the mobile node sends a Home Test Init or Care-of Test Init
message, it has to determine a value for the initial retransmission
timer. It should use the specified value of INITIAL_BINDACK_TIMEOUT
for this initial retransmission timer.
If, after sending either a Home Test Init or Care-of Test Init
message and the mobile node fails to receive a valid, matching
Home Test or Care-of Test message within the selected initial
retransmission interval, the mobile node SHOULD retransmit
the original message, until a valid answer is received. The
retransmissions by the mobile node MUST use an exponential
back-off process, in which the timeout period is doubled upon each
retransmission until either the node receives a valid response or the
timeout period reaches the value MAX_BINDACK_TIMEOUT.
11.5.4. Rate Limiting for Return Routability Procedure
A mobile node MUST NOT send Home Test Init or Care-of Test
Init messages to any individual node more often than once per
MAX_UPDATE_RATE seconds. After sending MAX_FAST_UPDATES consecutive
messages to a particular node with the same care-of address, the
mobile node SHOULD reduce its rate of sending these messages to that
node, to the rate of SLOW_UPDATE_RATE per second. The mobile node
MAY continue to send these messages at this slower rate indefinitely,
in hopes that the node will eventually be able to complete the return
routability procedure.
11.6. Processing Bindings
11.6.1. Sending Binding Updates to the Home Agent
After deciding to change its primary care-of address as described in
Sections 11.4.1 and 11.4.2, a mobile node MUST register this care-of
address with its home agent in order to make this its primary care-of
address. Also, if the mobile node wants the services of the home
agent beyond the current registration period, the mobile node MUST
send a new Binding Update to it well before the expiration of this
period, even if it is not changing its primary care-of address.
In both of these situations, the mobile node sends a packet to its
home agent containing a Binding Update message, with the packet
constructed as follows:
- The Home Registration (H) bit MUST be set in the Binding Update.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 111]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- The Acknowledge (A) bit MUST be set in the Binding Update.
- The packet MUST contain a Home Address destination option, giving
the mobile node's home address for the binding.
- The care-of address for the binding MUST be used as the Source
Address in the packet's IPv6 header, unless an Alternate Care-of
Address mobility option is included in the Binding Update
message.
- The `S' bit is set to the zero to request the mobile node's home
agent to serve as a home agent for all home addresses for the
mobile node based on all on-link subnet prefixes on the home
link; this is the default behavior. If the mobile node desires
that only a single home address should be affected by this
Binding Update, the `S' bit can be set to 1.
- If the mobile node's link-local address has the same interface
identifier (IID) as the home address for which it is supplying a
new care-of address, then the mobile node SHOULD set the `L' bit.
If the home address was generated using RFC 3041 [17], then the
link local address is unlikely to have a compatible IID. In this
case, the mobile node SHOULD NOT set the 'L' bit.
- The value specified in the Lifetime field SHOULD be less than
or equal to the remaining lifetime of the home address and the
care-of address specified for the binding.
The Acknowledge (A) bit in the Binding Update requests the home agent
to return a Binding Acknowledgement in response to this Binding
Update. As described in Section 6.1.8, the mobile node SHOULD
retransmit this Binding Update to its home agent until it receives
a matching Binding Acknowledgement. Once reaching a retransmission
timeout period of MAX_BINDACK_TIMEOUT, the mobile node SHOULD restart
the process of delivering the Binding Update, but trying instead the
next home agent from its Home Agents List (see Section 11.3.2). If
there is only one home agent in the Home Agents List, the mobile node
instead SHOULD continue to periodically retransmit the Binding Update
at this rate until acknowledged (or until it begins attempting to
register a different primary care-of address). See Section 11.6.8
for information about retransmitting Binding Updates.
Depending on the value of the Single Address Only (S) bit in the
Binding Update, the home agent is requested to serve either a single
home address or all home home addresses for the mobile node. Until
the lifetime of this registration expires, the home agent considers
itself the home agent for each such home address of the mobile node.
As the set of on-link subnet prefixes on the home link changes over
time, the home agent changes the set of home addresses for this
mobile node for which it is serving as the home agent.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 112]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Each Binding Update MUST be authenticated as coming from the right
mobile node, as defined in Section 5.1. The mobile node MUST use its
home address -- either in the Home Address destination option or in
the Source Address field of the IPv6 header -- in Binding Updates
sent to the home agent. This is necessary in order to allow the
IPsec policies to be matched with the right home address.
When sending a Binding Update to its home agent, the mobile node MUST
also create or update the corresponding Binding Update List entry, as
specified in Section 11.6.2.
The last Sequence Number value sent to the home agent in a Binding
Update is stored by the mobile node. If the sending mobile node has
no knowledge of the right Sequence Number value, it may start at any
value. If the home agent rejects the value, it sends back a Binding
Acknowledgement with status code 141, and the last accepted sequence
number in the Sequence Number field of the Binding Acknowledgement.
The mobile node MUST store this information and use the next Sequence
Number value for the next Binding Update it sends.
If the mobile node has additional home addresses using a different
interface identifier, then the mobile node SHOULD send an additional
packet containing a Binding Update to its home agent to register the
care-of address for each such other home address (or set of home
addresses sharing an interface identifier).
While the mobile node is away from home, it relies on the home agent
to participate in Duplicate Address Detection (DAD) to defend its
home address against stateless autoconfiguration performed by another
node. Therefore, the mobile node SHOULD set the Duplicate Address
Detection (D) bit based on any requirements for DAD that would apply
to the mobile node if it were at home [12, 13]. If the mobile
node's recent Binding Update was accepted by the home agent, and the
lifetime for that Binding Update has not yet expired, the mobile node
SHOULD NOT set the `D' bit in the new Binding Update; the home agent
will already be defending the home address(es) of the mobile node and
does not need to perform DAD again.
The home agent will only perform DAD for the mobile node's home
address when the mobile node has supplied a valid binding between
its home address and a care-of address. If some time elapses during
which the mobile node has no binding at the home agent, it might
be possible for another node to autoconfigure the mobile node's
home address. Therefore, the mobile node MUST treat creation of
a new binding with the home agent using an existing home address
the same as creation of a new home address. In the unlikely event
that the mobile node's home address is autoconfigured as the IPv6
address of another network node on the home network, the home agent
will reply to the mobile node's subsequent Binding Update with a
Binding Acknowledgement containing a Status of 138, Duplicate Address
Detection failed. In this case, the mobile node MUST NOT attempt to
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 113]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
re-use the same home address. It SHOULD continue to register care-of
addresses for its other home addresses, if any. The mobile node MAY
also attempt to acquire a new home address to replace the one for
which Status 138 was received, for instance by using the techniques
described in Appendix C.5.
11.6.2. Correspondent Binding Procedure
When the mobile node is assured that its home address is valid, it
MAY at any time initiate a correspondent binding procedure with
the purpose of allowing the correspondent node to cache the mobile
node's current care-of address. The mobile node is responsible for
the initiation and completion of this procedure, as well as any
retransmissions that may be needed (subject to the rate limiting
defined in Section 11.6.9).
This section defines the rules that the mobile node must follow
when performing the correspondent binding procedure. Appendix A
specifies also a (non-normative) state-machine that describes the
same procedure.
The mobile node can be assured that its home address is still valid,
for example, by the home agent's use the `D' bit of Binding Updates
(see Section 10.2). In any Binding Update sent by a mobile node,
the care-of address (either the Source Address in the packet's IPv6
header or the Care-of Address in the Alternate Care-of Address
mobility option of the Binding Update) MUST be set to one of the
care-of addresses currently in use by the mobile node or to the
mobile node's home address. A mobile node MAY set the care-of
address differently for sending Binding Updates to different
correspondent nodes.
A mobile node MAY choose to keep its location private from
certain correspondent nodes, and thus need not initiate the
return routability procedure, or send new Binding Updates to those
correspondents. A mobile node MAY also send a Binding Update to
such a correspondent node to instruct it to delete any existing
binding for the mobile node from its Binding Cache, as described in
Section 6.1.7. However, all Binding Updates to the correspondent
node require the successful completion of the return routability
procedure first, as no other IPv6 nodes are authorized to send
Binding Updates on behalf of a mobile node.
If set to one of the mobile node's current care-of addresses (the
care-of address given MAY differ from the mobile node's primary
care-of address), the Binding Update requests the correspondent node
to create or update an entry for the mobile node in the correspondent
node's Binding Cache in order to record this care-of address for use
in sending future packets to the mobile node. In this case, the
value specified in the Lifetime field sent in the Binding Update
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 114]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
SHOULD be less than or equal to the remaining lifetime of the home
address and the care-of address specified for the binding.
If, instead, the care-of address is set to the mobile node's home
address, the Binding Update requests the correspondent node to delete
any existing Binding Cache entry that it has for the mobile node.
When a mobile node sends a Binding Update to its home agent
to register a new primary care-of address (as described in
Section 11.6.1), the mobile node SHOULD also start a return
routability procedure to each other node for which an entry exists
in the mobile node's Binding Update List, as detailed below. Upon
successful return routability procedure and after receiving a
successful Binding Acknowledgement from the Home Agent, a Binding
Update message is sent to all other nodes. Thus, other relevant
nodes are generally kept updated about the mobile node's binding and
can send packets directly to the mobile node using the mobile node's
current care-of address.
The mobile node, however, need not initiate these actions immediately
after configuring a new care-of address. For example, the mobile
node MAY delay initiating the return routability procedure to any
correspondent node for a short period of time, if it isn't certain
that there's traffic to the correspondent node. This is particularly
useful if the mobile node anticipates that it is not going to stay
long in this location.
In addition, when a mobile node receives a packet for which the
mobile node can deduce that the original sender of the packet either
has no Binding Cache entry for the mobile node, or a stale entry
for the mobile node in its Binding Cache, the mobile node SHOULD
initiate a return routability procedure with the sender, in order to
finally update the sender's Binding Cache with the current care-of
address (subject to the rate limiting defined in Section 11.6.9).
In particular, the mobile node SHOULD initiate a return routability
procedure in response to receiving a packet that meets all of the
following tests:
- The packet was tunneled using IPv6 encapsulation.
- The Destination Address in the tunnel (outer) IPv6 header is
equal to any of the mobile node's care-of addresses.
- The Destination Address in the original (inner) IPv6 header
is equal to one of the mobile node's home addresses; or this
Destination Address is equal to one of the mobile node's previous
care-of addresses for which the mobile node has an entry in its
Binding Update List, representing an unexpired Binding Update
sent to a home agent on the link on which its previous care-of
address is located (Section 11.6.6).
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 115]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- The Source Address in the tunnel (outer) IPv6 header differs from
the Source Address in the original (inner) IPv6 header.
The destination address to which the procedure should be initiated to
in response to receiving a packet meeting all of the above tests is
the Source Address in the original (inner) IPv6 header of the packet.
The home address for which this Binding Update is sent should be the
Destination Address of the original (inner) packet.
Binding Updates sent to correspondent nodes are not generally
required to be acknowledged. However, if the mobile node wants
to be sure that its new care-of address has been entered into a
correspondent node's Binding Cache, the mobile node MAY request an
acknowledgement by setting the Acknowledge (A) bit in the Binding
Update. In this case, however, the mobile node SHOULD NOT continue
to retransmit the Binding Update once the retransmission timeout
period has reached MAX_BINDACK_TIMEOUT.
The mobile node SHOULD create a Binding Update message as follows:
- The Source Address of the IPv6 header MUST contain the current
care-of address of the mobile node.
- The Destination Address of the IPv6 header MUST contain the
address of the correspondent node.
- The Mobility Header is constructed according to rules in
Section 6.1.7, including the authenticator field which is
calculated based on the received Home and Care-of Cookies.
- The Home Address destination option MUST be attached to the
message, unless the Source Address is the home address of the
mobile node.
Each Binding Update MUST a Sequence Number greater than the Sequence
Number value sent in the previous Binding Update (if any) to the same
destination address modulo 2**16, as described in Section 9.4.1.
There is no requirement, however, that the Sequence Number value
strictly increase by 1 with each new Binding Update sent or received,
as long as the value stays within the window. The last Sequence
Number value sent to a destination in a Binding Update is stored
by the mobile node in its Binding Update List entry for that
destination. If the sending mobile node has no Binding Update List
entry, the Sequence Number SHOULD start at a random value. The
mobile node MUST NOT use the same Sequence Number in two different
Binding Updates to the same correspondent node, even if the Binding
Updates provide different care-of addresses.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 116]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
11.6.3. Receiving Binding Acknowledgements
Upon receiving a packet carrying a Binding Acknowledgement, a mobile
node MUST validate the packet according to the following tests:
- The packet meets the authentication requirements for Binding
Acknowledgements, defined in Sections 6.1.8 and 5. That is,
if the Binding Update was sent to the home agent, underlying
IPsec protection is used. If the Binding Update was sent to the
correspondent node, the authenticator field MUST be present and
have a valid value.
- The Header Len field in the Binding Acknowledgement message is
greater than or equal to the length specified in Section 6.1.8.
- The Sequence Number field matches the Sequence Number sent by the
mobile node to this destination address in an outstanding Binding
Update.
Any Binding Acknowledgement not satisfying all of these tests MUST be
silently ignored.
When a mobile node receives a packet carrying a valid Binding
Acknowledgement, the mobile node MUST examine the Status field as
follows:
- If the Status field indicates that the Binding Update was
accepted (the Status field is less than 128), then the mobile
node MUST update the corresponding entry in its Binding Update
List to indicate that the Binding Update has been acknowledged;
the mobile node MUST then stop retransmitting the Binding Update.
In addition, if the value specified in the Lifetime field in the
Binding Acknowledgement is less than the Lifetime value sent
in the Binding Update being acknowledged, then the mobile node
MUST subtract the difference between these two Lifetime values
from the remaining lifetime for the binding as maintained in the
corresponding Binding Update List entry (with a minimum value
for the Binding Update List entry lifetime of 0). That is, if
the Lifetime value sent in the Binding Update was L_update, the
Lifetime value received in the Binding Acknowledgement was L_ack,
and the current remaining lifetime of the Binding Update List
entry is L_remain, then the new value for the remaining lifetime
of the Binding Update List entry should be
max((L_remain - (L_update - L_ack)), 0)
where max(X, Y) is the maximum of X and Y. The effect of this
step is to correctly manage the mobile node's view of the
binding's remaining lifetime (as maintained in the corresponding
Binding Update List entry) so that it correctly counts down from
the Lifetime value given in the Binding Acknowledgement, but with
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 117]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
the timer countdown beginning at the time that the Binding Update
was sent.
Mobile nodes SHOULD send a new Binding Update well before the
expiration of this period in order to extend the lifetime and
not cause a disruption in communications. This is particularly
necessary in order to prevent packets from being dropped due
to the use of the Home Address destination option without an
existing Binding Cache Entry, and the possibility of clock drift.
- If the Status field indicates that the Binding Update was
rejected (the Status field is greater than or equal to 128), then
the mobile node MUST delete the corresponding Binding Update List
entry, and it MUST also stop retransmitting the Binding Update.
Optionally, the mobile node MAY then take steps to correct the
cause of the error and retransmit the Binding Update (with a new
Sequence Number value), subject to the rate limiting restriction
specified in Section 11.6.9.
11.6.4. Receiving Binding Refresh Requests
When a mobile node receives a packet containing a Binding Refresh
Request message and there already exists a Binding Update List
entry for the source of the Binding Refresh Request, it MAY start
a return routability procedure (see Section 5) if it believes
the amount of traffic with the correspondent justifies the use of
route optimization. Note that the mobile node SHOULD NOT respond
Binding Requests from previously unknown correspondent nodes due to
Denial-of-Service concerns.
If the return routability procedure completes successfully, a
Binding Update message SHOULD be sent as described in Section 11.6.2.
The Lifetime field in this Binding Update SHOULD be set to a new
lifetime, extending any current lifetime remaining from a previous
Binding Update sent to this node (as indicated in any existing
Binding Update List entry for this node), and lifetime SHOULD
again be less than or equal to the remaining lifetime of the home
registration and the care-of address specified for the binding. When
sending this Binding Update, the mobile node MUST update its Binding
Update List in the same way as for any other Binding Update sent by
the mobile node.
Note, however, that the mobile node MAY choose to delete its binding
from the sender of the Binding Refresh Request. In this case, the
mobile node instead SHOULD return a Binding Update to the sender,
in which the Lifetime field is set to zero and the care-of address
(using a Alternate Care-Of Address option) is set to the mobile
node's home address.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 118]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
If the Binding Refresh Request for which the Binding Update is being
returned contains a Unique Identifier mobility option, the resulting
Home Test Init, Care-of Test Init, and Update messages MUST also
include a Unique Identifier mobility option. The unique identifier
in the Option Data field of the Unique Identifier mobility option
MUST be copied from the unique identifier carried in the Binding
Refresh Request.
11.6.5. Receiving Binding Error Messages
When a mobile node receives a packet containing a Binding Error
message, it should first check if the mobile node has a Binding
Update List entry for the the source of the Binding Error message.
If the mobile node does not have such entry, it MUST ignore the
message. This is necessary to prevent a waste of resources on e.g.
return routability procedure due to spoofed Binding Error messages.
Otherwise, if the message Status field was 1 (Home Address
destination option used without a binding), the mobile node should
perform one of the following two actions:
- If the mobile node does have a Binding Update List entry but
has recent upper layer progress information that indicates
communications with the correspondent node are progressing, it
MAY ignore the message. This can be done in order to limit the
damage that spoofed Binding Error messages can cause to ongoing
communications.
- If the mobile node does have a Binding Update List entry but
no upper layer progress information, it MUST remove the entry
and route further communications through the home agent. It
MAY also optionally start a return routability procedure (see
Section 5.2).
If the message Status field was 2 (received message had an unknown
value for the MH Type field), the mobile node should perform one of
the following two actions:
- If the mobile node is not expecting an acknowledgement or
response from the correspondent node, the mobile node SHOULD
ignore this message.
- Otherwise, the mobile node SHOULD cease the use of any extensions
to this specification. If no extensions had been used, the
mobile node should cease the attempt to use route optimization.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 119]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
11.6.6. Forwarding from a Previous Care-of Address
When a mobile node connects to a new link and forms a new care-of
address, it MAY establish forwarding of packets from a previous
care-of address to this new care-of address. To do so, the mobile
node sends a Binding Update to any home agent on the link on which
the previous care-of address is located, indicating this previous
care-of address as the home address for the binding, and giving its
new care-of address as the binding's care-of address. Such packet
forwarding allows packets destined to the mobile node from nodes that
have not yet learned the mobile node's new care-of address, to be
forwarded to the mobile node rather than being lost once the mobile
node is no longer reachable at this previous care-of address.
This Binding Update is sent to a home agent, albeit a temporary
one. Nevertheless, the authentication requirements for Binding
Updates from a mobile node to its home agent apply, as specified in
Section 11.6.1.
In constructing this Binding Update, the mobile node utilizes the
following specific steps:
- The Home Address field in the Home Address destination option
in the packet carrying the Binding Update MUST be set to the
previous care-of address for which packet forwarding is being
established.
- The care-of address for the new binding MUST be set to the new
care-of address to which packets destined to the previous care-of
address are to be forwarded. Normally, this care-of address for
the binding is specified by setting the Source Address of the
packet carrying the Binding Update, to this address. However,
the mobile node MAY instead include an Alternate Care-of Address
mobility option in the Binding Update message, with its Alternate
Care-of Address field set to the care-of address for the binding.
- The Home Registration (H) bit MUST also be set in this Binding
Update, to request this home agent to temporarily act as a home
agent for this previous care-of address.
- The Duplicate Address Detection (D) and Link-Local Address
Compatibility (L) MUST also be set in this Binding Update.
If previous care-of address did not have the same interface
identifier as the mobile link-local address, the mobile node MUST
NOT use forwarding from a previous care-of address.
This home agent will thus tunnel packets for the mobile node (packets
destined to its specified previous care-of address) to its new
care-of address. All of the procedures defined for home agent
operation MUST be followed by this home agent for this registration.
Note that this home agent does not necessarily know (and need not
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 120]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
know) the mobile node's (permanent) home address as part of this
registration.
The packet carrying the Binding Update MUST be addressed to
this home agent's global unicast address. Normally, this global
unicast address is learned by the mobile node based on the Router
Advertisements received by the mobile node (Section 7.2) while
attached to the link on which this previous care-of address and this
home agent are located; the mobile node obtains this home agent
address from its Home Agents List (Section 4.4). Alternatively,
the mobile node MAY use dynamic home agent address discovery
(Section 10.9) to discover the global unicast address of a home agent
on this previous link, but it SHOULD use an address from its Home
Agents List if available for the prefix it used to form this previous
care-of address.
As with any packet containing a Binding Update (see Section 6.1.7),
the Binding Update packet to this home agent MUST meet the
authentication requirements for Binding Updates, defined in
Section 5.1 and 11.6.1.
11.6.7. Returning Home
A mobile node detects that it has returned to its home link through
the movement detection algorithm in use (Section 11.4.1), when the
mobile node detects that its home subnet prefix is again on-link.
The mobile node SHOULD then send a Binding Update to its home agent,
to instruct its home agent to no longer intercept or tunnel packets
for it. In this home registration, the mobile node MUST set the
Acknowledge (A) and Home Registration (H) bits, and set the care-of
address for the binding to the mobile node's own home address. The
mobile node MUST NOT include a Home Address option in this Binding
Update.
When sending this Binding Update to its home agent, the mobile
node must be careful in how it uses Neighbor Solicitation [12] (if
needed) to learn the home agent's link-layer address, since the home
agent will be currently configured to defend the mobile node's home
address for Duplicate Address Detection. In particular, a Neighbor
Solicitation from the mobile node using its home address as the
Source Address would be detected by the home agent as a duplicate
address. In many cases, Neighbor Solicitation by the mobile node
for the home agent's address will not be necessary, since the mobile
node may have already learned the home agent's link-layer address,
for example from a Source Link-Layer Address option in the Router
Advertisement from which it learned that its home address was on-link
and that the mobile node had thus returned home.
If the mobile node does Neighbor Solicitation to learn the home
agent's link-layer address, in this special case of the mobile node
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 121]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
returning home, the mobile node MUST multicast the packet, and in
addition set the Source Address of this Neighbor Solicitation to the
unspecified address (0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0). The target of the Neighbor
Solicitation MUST be set to the home agent's IPv6 address, which is
known to the mobile node. The destination IP address MUST be set to
the Solicited-Node multicast address [3]. The home agent will be
unable to distinguish this solicitation from a similar packet that
would only be used for DAD, and it will respond as if for DAD. The
home agent will send a multicast Neighbor Advertisement back to the
mobile node with the Solicited flag ('S') set to zero. The mobile
node SHOULD accept this advertisement, and set the state of the
Neighbor Cache entry for the home agent to REACHABLE.
The mobile node then sends its Binding Update using the home agent's
link-layer address, instructing its home agent to no longer serve
as a home agent for it. By processing this Binding Update, the
home agent will cease defending the mobile node's home address for
Duplicate Address Detection and will no longer respond to Neighbor
Solicitations for the mobile node's home address. The mobile node
is then the only node on the link receiving packets at the mobile
node's home address. In addition, when returning home prior to the
expiration of a current binding for its home address, and configuring
its home address on its network interface on its home link, the
mobile node MUST NOT perform Duplicate Address Detection on its own
home address, in order to avoid confusion or conflict with its home
agent's use of the same address. If the mobile node returns home
after the bindings for all of its care-of addresses have expired,
then it SHOULD perform DAD. It SHOULD also perform DAD for addresses
which may have been registered with 'D' and 'S' bits set to one.
After the Mobile Node sends the Binding Update, the Home Agent MUST
remove the Proxy Neighbor Cache entry for the Mobile Node and MAY
learn its link-layer address based on the link-layer packet or cached
information, or if that is not available, it SHOULD send a Neighbor
Solicitation with the target address equal to the Binding Update's
source IP address. The Mobile Node MUST then reply with a unicast
Neighbor Advertisement to the Home Agent with its link-layer address.
While the Mobile Node is waiting for a Binding Acknowledgement, it
MUST NOT respond to any Neighbor Solicitations for its Home Address
other than those originating from the IP address to which it sent the
Binding Update.
After receiving the Binding Acknowledgement for its Binding Update
to its home agent, the mobile node MUST multicast onto the home
link (to the all-nodes multicast address) a Neighbor Advertisement
message [12], to advertise the mobile node's own link-layer address
for its own home address. The Target Address in this Neighbor
Advertisement message MUST be set to the mobile node's home address,
and the Advertisement MUST include a Target Link-layer Address option
specifying the mobile node's link-layer address. The mobile node
MUST multicast such a Neighbor Advertisement message for each of its
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 122]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
home addresses, as defined by the current on-link prefixes, including
its link-local address and site-local address. The Solicited
Flag (S) in these Advertisements MUST NOT be set, since they were
not solicited by any Neighbor Solicitation message. The Override
Flag (O) in these Advertisements MUST be set, indicating that the
Advertisements SHOULD override any existing Neighbor Cache entries at
any node receiving them.
Since multicasting on the local link (such as Ethernet) is typically
not guaranteed to be reliable, the mobile node MAY retransmit these
Neighbor Advertisement messages up to MAX_ADVERT_REXMIT times to
increase their reliability. It is still possible that some nodes on
the home link will not receive any of these Neighbor Advertisements,
but these nodes will eventually be able to recover through use of
Neighbor Unreachability Detection [12].
11.6.8. Retransmitting Binding Updates
The mobile node is responsible for retransmissions in the binding
procedure.
When the mobile node sends a Binding Update message, it has to
determine a value for the initial retransmission timer. If the
mobile node is changing or updating an existing binding at the home
agent, it should use the specified value of INITIAL_BINDACK_TIMEOUT
for this initial retransmission timer. If on the other hand the
mobile node does not have an existing binding at the home agent, it
SHOULD use a value for the initial retransmission timer that is at
least 1.5 times longer than (RetransTimer * DupAddrDetectTransmits).
This value is likely to be substantially longer than the otherwise
specified value of INITIAL_BINDACK_TIMEOUT that would be used by the
mobile node. This longer retransmission interval will allow the the
home agent to complete the DAD procedure which is mandated in this
case, as detailed in Section 11.6.1.
If, after sending a Binding Update in which the care-of address has
changed and the Acknowledge (A) bit is set, a mobile node fails
to receive a valid, matching Binding Acknowledgement within the
selected initial retransmission interval, the mobile node SHOULD
retransmit the Binding Update, until a Binding Acknowledgement is
received. Such a retransmitted Binding Update MUST use a Sequence
Number value greater than that used for the previous transmission of
this Binding Update. The retransmissions by the mobile node MUST
use an exponential back-off process, in which the timeout period
is doubled upon each retransmission until either the node receives
a Binding Acknowledgement or the timeout period reaches the value
MAX_BINDACK_TIMEOUT.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 123]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
11.6.9. Rate Limiting Binding Updates
A mobile node MUST NOT send Binding Update messages for the
same binding to any individual node more often than once per
MAX_UPDATE_RATE seconds. After sending MAX_FAST_UPDATES consecutive
messages to a particular node with the same care-of address, the
mobile node SHOULD reduce its rate of sending these messages to that
node, to the rate of SLOW_UPDATE_RATE per second. The mobile node
MAY continue to send these messages at this slower rate indefinitely,
in hopes that the node will eventually be able to process a Binding
Update, and begin to route its packets directly to the mobile node at
its new care-of address.
11.7. Receiving ICMP Error Messages
Any node receiving a Mobility header that does not recognize the
protocol SHOULD return an ICMP Parameter Problem, Code 1, message
to the sender of the packet. If a node performing the return
routability procedure or sending a Binding Update receives such an
ICMP error message in response, it SHOULD record in its Binding
Update List that future Binding Updates SHOULD NOT be sent to this
destination.
Correspondent nodes who have participated in the return routability
procedure MUST implement the ability to correctly process received
packets containing a Home Address destination option. Therefore,
correctly implemented correspondent nodes should always be able to
recognize Home Address options. If a mobile node receives an ICMP
Parameter Problem, Code 2, message from some node indicating that it
does not support the Home Address option, the mobile node SHOULD log
the error and then discard the ICMP message.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 124]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
12. Protocol Constants
HomeRtrAdvInterval 3,600 seconds
DHAAD_RETRIES 3 retransmissions
INITIAL_BINDACK_TIMEOUT 1 second
INITIAL_DHAAD_TIMEOUT 2 seconds
INITIAL_SOLICIT_TIMER 2 seconds
MAX_ADVERT_REXMIT 3 transmissions
MAX_BINDACK_TIMEOUT 256 seconds
MAX_COOKIE_LIFE 240 seconds
MAX_FAST_UPDATES 5 transmissions
MAX_PFX_ADV_DELAY 1,000 seconds
MAX_RR_BINDING_LIFE 420 seconds
MAX_UPDATE_RATE once per second
PREFIX_ADV_RETRIES 3 retransmissions
PREFIX_ADV_TIMEOUT 5 seconds
SLOW_UPDATE_RATE once per 10 second interval
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 125]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
13. IANA Considerations
This document defines a new IPv6 protocol, the Mobility Header,
described in Section 6.1. This protocol must be assigned a protocol
number. The MH Type field in the Mobility Header is used to indicate
a particular type of a message. The current message types are
described in Sections 6.1.2 through 6.1.9, and include the following:
0 Binding Refresh Request
1 Home Test Init
2 Care-of Test Init
3 Home Test
4 Care-of Test
5 Binding Update
6 Binding Acknowledgement
7 Binding Error
Future values of the MH Type can be allocated using standards
action [10].
Furthermore, each Mobility Header message may contain mobility
options as described in Section 6.2. The current mobility options
are defined in Sections 6.2.4 through 6.2.5, and include the
following:
0 Pad1
1 PadN
2 Unique Identifier
3 Alternate Care-of Address
4 Nonce Indices
5 Authorization Data
Future values of the Option Type can be allocated using standards
action [10].
This document also defines a new IPv6 destination option, the Home
Address option, described in Section 6.3. This option must be
assigned an Option Type value.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 126]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
This document also defines a new IPv6 Type 2 Routing Header,
described in Section 6.4. The value 2 must be allocated by IANA when
this specification becomes an RFC.
In addition, this document defines four ICMP message types, two used
as part of the dynamic home agent address discovery mechanism and
two used in lieu of router solicitations and advertisements when the
mobile node is away from the home link:
- The Home Agent Address Discovery Request message, described in
Section 6.5;
- The Home Agent Address Discovery Reply message, described in
Section 6.6;
- The Mobile Prefix Solicitation message, described in Section 6.7;
and
- The Mobile Prefix Advertisement message, described in
Section 6.8.
This document also defines two new Neighbor Discovery [12] options,
which must be assigned Option Type values within the option numbering
space for Neighbor Discovery messages:
- The Advertisement Interval option, described in Section 7.3; and
- The Home Agent Information option, described in Section 7.4.
14. Security Considerations
14.1. Threats
Any mobility solution must protect itself against misuses of
the mobility features and mechanisms. In Mobile IPv6, most of
the potential threats are concerned with false Bindings, usually
resulting in Denial-of-Service attacks. Some of the threats also
pose potential for Man-in-the-Middle, Hijacking, Confidentiality,
and Impersonation attacks. The main threats this protocol protects
against are the following:
1. Threats involving Binding Updates sent to home agents and
correspondent nodes. For instance, an attacker might claim that
a certain mobile node is currently at a different location than
it really is. If a home agent accepts such spoofed information
sent to it, the mobile node might not get traffic destined to
it. Similarly, a malicious (mobile) node might use the home
address of a victim node in a forged Binding Update sent to a
correspondent node.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 127]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
These pose threats against confidentiality, integrity, and
availability. That is, an attacker might learn the contents
of packets destined to another node by redirecting the traffic
to itself. Furthermore, an attacker might use the redirected
packets in an attempt to set itself as a Man-in-the-Middle
between a mobile and a correspondent node. This would allow the
attacker to impersonate the mobile node, leading to integrity and
availability problems.
A malicious (mobile) node might also send Binding Updates in
which the care-of address is set to the address of a victim
node. If such Binding Updates were accepted, the malicious
node could lure the correspondent node into sending potentially
large amounts of data to the victim; the correspondent node's
replies to messages sent by the malicious mobile node will be
sent to the victim host or network. This could be used to
cause a Distributed Denial-of-Service attack. For example,
the correspondent node might be a site that will send a
high-bandwidth stream of video to anyone who asks for it. Note
that the use of flow-control protocols such as TCP does not
necessarily defend against this type of attack, because the
attacker can fake the acknowledgements. Even keeping TCP initial
sequence numbers secret doesn't help, because the attacker can
receive the first few segments (including the ISN) at its own
address, and only then redirect the stream to the victim's
address. These types of attacks may also be directed towards
networks instead of nodes. Further variations of this threat are
described elsewhere [29, 30].
An attacker might also attempt to disrupt a mobile node's
communications by replaying a Binding Update that the node had
sent earlier. If the old Binding Update was accepted, packets
destined for the mobile node would be sent to its old location
and not its current location.
In conclusion, there are Denial-of-Service, Man-in-the-Middle,
Confidentiality, and Impersonation threats against the
parties involved in sending legitimate Binding Updates, and
Denial-of-Service threats against any other party.
2. Threats associated with payload packets: Payload packets
exchanged with mobile nodes are exposed to similar threats as
regular IPv6 traffic is. However, Mobile IPv6 introduces the
Home Address destination option, a new Routing Header type (Type
2), and uses tunneling headers in the payload packets. The
protocol must protect against potential new threats involving the
use of these mechanisms.
Third parties become exposed to a reflection threat via the
Home Address destination option, unless appropriate security
precautions are followed. The Home Address destination option
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 128]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
could be used to direct response traffic toward a node whose IP
address appears in the option. In this case, ingress filtering
would not catch the forged "return address" [31] [32].
A similar threat exists with the tunnels between the mobile node
and the home agent. An attacker might forge tunnel packets
between the mobile node and the home agent, making it appear
that the traffic is coming from the mobile node when it is not.
Note that an attacker who is able to forge tunnel packets would
typically be able forge also packets that appear to come directly
from the mobile node. This is a not a new threat as such.
However, it may make it easier for attackers to escape detection
by avoiding ingress filtering and packet tracing mechanisms.
Furthermore, spoofed tunnel packets might be used to gain access
to the home network.
Finally, a Routing Header could also be used in reflection
attacks, and in attacks designed to bypass firewalls.
The generality of the regular Routing Header would allow
circumvention of IP-address based rules in firewalls. It would
also allow reflection of traffic to other nodes. These threats
exist with Routing Headers in general, even if the usage that
Mobile IPv6 requires is safe.
3. Threats against the Mobile IPv6 security mechanisms themselves:
An attacker might, for instance, lure the participants into
executing expensive cryptographic operations or allocating memory
for the purpose of keeping state. The victim node would have no
resources left to handle other tasks.
As a fundamental service in an IPv6 stack, Mobile IPv6 is expected to
be deployed in most nodes of the IPv6 Internet. The above threats
should therefore be considered in the light of being applicable to
the whole Internet.
14.2. Features
This specification provides a number of security features designed to
mitigate or alleviate the threats listed above. The main security
features are the following:
- Protection of Binding Updates sent to home agents.
- Protection of Binding Updates sent to correspondent nodes.
- Protection against reflection attacks that use the Home Address
destination option.
- Protection of tunnels between the mobile node and the home agent.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 129]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- Closing Routing Header vulnerabilities.
- Mitigating Denial-of-Service threats to the Mobile IPv6 security
mechanisms themselves.
Protecting those Binding Updates that are sent to home agents and
those that are sent to arbitrary correspondent nodes requires very
different security solutions due to the different situations. Mobile
nodes and home agents are expected to be naturally subject to the
network administration of the home domain.
Thus, they can and are supposed to have a strong security association
that can be used to reliably authenticate the exchanged messages.
See Section 5.1 for the description of the protocol mechanisms,
and Section 14.3 below for a discussion of the resulting level of
security.
It is expected that Mobile IPv6 route optimization will be
used on a global basis between nodes belonging to different
administrative domains. It would be a very demanding task to
build an authentication infrastructure on this scale. Furthermore,
a traditional authentication infrastructure cannot be easily
used to authenticate IP addresses, because these change often.
It is not sufficient to just authenticate the mobile nodes.
Authorization to claim the right to use an address is needed as
well. Thus, an "infrastructureless" approach is necessary. The
chosen infrastructureless method is described in Section 5.2 and
Section 14.4 discusses the resulting security level and the design
rationale of this approach.
Specific rules guide the use of the Home Address destination option,
the Routing Header, and the tunneling headers in the payload packets.
These rules are necessary to remove the vulnerabilities associated
with their unrestricted use. The effect of the rules is discussed in
Sections 14.5, 14.6, and 14.7.
Denial-of-Service threats against Mobile IPv6 security mechanisms
themselves concern mainly the Binding Update procedures with
correspondent nodes. The protocol has been designed to limit the
effects of such attacks, as will be described in Section 14.4.5.
14.3. Binding Updates to Home Agent
Signaling between the mobile node and the home agent requires message
integrity, correct ordering and replay protection. This is necessary
to assure the home agent that a Binding Update is from a legitimate
mobile node.
IPsec AH or ESP protects the integrity of the Binding Updates and
Binding Acknowledgements, by securing Mobility Header messages
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 130]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
between the mobile node and the home agent. However, IPsec can
easily provide replay protection only if dynamic security association
establishment is used. This may not always be possible, and manual
keying would be preferred in some cases. IPsec also does not
guarantee correct ordering of packets, only that they have not been
replayed. Because of this, sequence numbers with the Mobile IPv6
messages ensure correct ordering (see Section 5.1). However, if
a home agent reboots and loses its state regarding the sequence
numbers, replay attacks become possible. The use of a key management
mechanism together with IPsec can be used to prevent such replay
attacks.
A sliding window scheme is used for the sequence numbers. The
protection against replays and reordering attacks without a key
management mechanism works when the attacker remembers up to a
maximum of 2**15 Binding Updates.
The above mechanisms do not show that the care-of address given
in the Binding Update is correct. This opens the possibility for
Denial-of-Service attacks against third parties. However, since the
mobile node and home agent have a security association, the home
agent can always identify an ill-behaving mobile node. This allows
the home agent operator to discontinue the mobile node's service, and
possibly take further actions based on the business relationship with
the mobile node's owner.
Note that where forwarding from a previous care-of address is used,
a router in the visited network must act as a temporary home agent
for the mobile node. Nevertheless, the same security requirements
apply in this case. That is, a pre-arranged security association
must exist even with the temporary home agent. This limits the use
of the forwarding feature to those networks where such arrangements
are practical.
Note that the use of a single pair of manually keyed security
associations conflicts with the generation of a new home
addresses [17] for the mobile node, or with the adoption of a
new home prefix. This is because IPsec SAs are bound to the used
addresses. While certificate-based automatic keying alleviates
this problem to an extent, it is still necessary to ensure that a
given mobile node can not send Binding Updates for the address of
another mobile node. In general, this leads to the inclusion of
home addresses in certificates in the Subject AltName field. This
again limits the introduction of new addresses without either manual
or automatic procedures to establish new certificates. Therefore,
this specification limits restricts the generation of new home
addresses (for any reason) to those situations where there already
exists a security association or certificate for the new address.
(Section C.4 lists the improvement of security for new addresses as
one of the future developments for Mobile IPv6.)
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 131]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
14.4. Binding Updates to Correspondent Nodes
14.4.1. Overview
The motivation for designing the return routability procedure
was to have sufficient support for Mobile IPv6, without creating
significant new security problems. The goal for this procedure was
not to protect against attacks that were already possible before the
introduction of Mobile IPv6.
The chosen infrastructureless method verifies that the mobile node
is "live" (that is, it responds to probes) at its home and care-of
addresses. Section 5.2 describes the return routability procedure in
detail. The procedure uses the following principles:
- A cookie exchange verifies that the mobile node is reachable at
its addresses i.e. is at least able to transmit and receive
traffic at both the home and care-of addresses.
- The eventual Binding Update is cryptographically bound to the
exchanged cookies.
- Symmetric exchanges are employed to avoid the use of this
protocol in reflection attacks. In a symmetric exchange, the
responses are always sent to the same address as the request was
sent from.
- The correspondent node operates in a stateless manner until it
receives a fully authorized Binding Update.
- Some additional protection is provided by encrypting the tunnels
between the mobile node and home agent with IPsec ESP. As the
tunnel transports also the cookie exchanges, this limits the
ability of attackers to see these cookies. For instance, this
prevents attacks launched from the mobile node's current foreign
link where no link-layer confidentiality is available.
For further information about the design rationale of the return
routability procedure, see [29, 30, 33, 32]. The used mechanisms
have been adopted from these documents.
14.4.2. Offered Protection
This procedure protects Binding Updates against all attackers
who are unable to monitor the path between the home agent and the
correspondent node. The procedure does not defend against attackers
who can monitor this path. Note that such attackers are in any case
able to mount an active attack against the mobile node when it is
at its home location. The possibility of such attacks is not an
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 132]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
impediment to the deployment of Mobile IPv6, because these attacks
are possible regardless of whether Mobile IPv6 is in use.
This procedure also protects against Denial-of-Service attacks in
which the attacker pretends to be a mobile, but uses the victim's
address as the care of address. This would cause the correspondent
node to send the victim some unexpected traffic. The procedure
defends against these attacks by requiring the participation of the
node at the care-of address. Normally, this will be the mobile node.
The Binding Acknowledgement is not authenticated in other ways than
including the right sequence number in the reply.
14.4.3. Comparison to Regular IPv6 Communications
This section discusses the protection offered by the return
routability method by comparing it to the security of regular IPv6
communications. We will divide vulnerabilities in three classes:
(1) those related to attackers on the local network of the mobile
node, home agent, or the correspondent node, (2) those related to
attackers on the path between the MN/HA and the CN, and (3) off-path
attackers, i.e. the rest of the Internet.
We will now discuss the vulnerabilities of regular IPv6
communications. The on-link vulnerabilities of IPv6 communications
include Denial-of-Service, Masquerading, Man-in-the-Middle,
Eavesdropping, and other attacks. These attacks can be launched
through spoofing Router Discovery, Neighbor Discovery and other IPv6
mechanisms. Some of these attacks can be prevented with the use of
cryptographic protection in the packets.
A similar situation exists with on-path attackers. That is, without
cryptographic protection the traffic is completely vulnerable.
Assuming that attackers have not penetrated the security of the
Internet routing protocols, attacks are much harder to launch
from off-path locations. Attacks that can be launched from these
locations are mainly Denial-of-Service attacks, such as flooding
and/or reflection attacks. It is not possible for an off-path
attacker to become a MitM. (Since IPv6 communications are relatively
well protected against off-path attackers, it is important that
Mobile IPv6 prevents off-path attacks as well.)
Next, we will consider the vulnerabilities that exist when IPv6 is
used together with Mobile IPv6 and the return routability procedure.
On the local link the vulnerabilities are same as those as in IPv6,
but Masquerade and MitM attacks can now be launched also against
future communications, and not just against current communications.
If a binding update was sent while the attacker was present on the
link, its effects stay during the lifetime of the binding. This
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 133]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
happens even if the attacker moves away from the link. In regular
IPv6, the attacker generally has to be stay on the link in order to
continue the attack. Note that in order to launch these new attacks,
the IP address of the victim must be known. This makes this attack
feasible mainly in the context of well-known interface IDs, such as
those already appearing in the traffic on the link or registered in
the DNS.
On-path attackers can exploit similar vulnerabilities as in regular
IPv6. There are some minor differences, however. Masquerade, MitM,
and DoS attacks can be launched with just the interception of a few
packets, whereas in regular IPv6 it is necessary to intercept every
packet. The effect of the attacks is the same regardless of the
method, however. In any case, the most difficult task attacker faces
in these attacks is getting to the right path.
The vulnerabilities for off-path attackers are the same as in regular
IPv6. Those nodes that are not on the path between the home agent
and the correspondent node will not be able to receive the probe
messages.
In conclusion, we can state the following main results from this
comparison:
- Return routability procedure prevents any off-path attacks beyond
those that are already possible in regular IPv6. This is the
most important result, and prevents attackers from the Internet
from exploiting any vulnerabilities.
- Vulnerabilities to attackers on the home agent link, the
correspondent node link, and the path between them are roughly
the same as in regular IPv6.
- However, one difference is that in basic IPv6 an on-path attacker
must be constantly present on the link or the path, whereas with
Mobile IPv6 an attacker can leave a binding behind after moving
away.
For this reason, this specification limits the creation of
bindings to at most MAX_COOKIE_LIFE seconds after the last
routability check has been performed, and limits the duration of
a binding to at most MAX_RR_BINDING_LIFE seconds. With these
limitation, attackers can not take practical advantages of this
vulnerability. This limited vulnerability can also be compared
to similar vulnerabilities in IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, with
Neighbour Cache entries having a limited lifetime.
- There are some other minor differences, such as an effect
to the DoS vulnerabilities. These can be considered to be
insignificant.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 134]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- The path between the home agent and a correspondent node is
typically easiest to attack on the links at either end, in
particular if these links are publicly accessible wireless LANs.
Attacks against the routers or switches on the path are typically
harder to accomplish. The security on layer 2 of the links plays
then a major role in the resulting overall network security.
Similarly, security of IPv6 Neighbor and Router Discovery on
these links has a large impact. If these were secured using
some new technology in the future, this could make the return
routability procedure the easiest route for attackers. For this
reason, this specification should have a protection mechanism for
selecting between return routability and potential other future
mechanisms.
For a more in-depth discussion of these issues, see [32].
14.4.4. Return Routability Replays
The return routability procedure also protects the participants
against replayed Binding Updates. The attacker is unable replay
the same message due to the sequence number which is a part of the
Binding Update. It is also unable to modify the Binding Update since
the MAC would not verify after such modification.
Care must be taken when removing bindings at the correspondent
node, however. If a binding is removed while the nonce used in its
creation is still valid, an attacker could replay the old Binding
Update. Rules outlined in Section 5.2.8 ensure that this can not
happen.
14.4.5. Return Routability Denial-of-Service
The return routability procedure has protection against resource
exhaustion Denial-of-Service attacks. The correspondent nodes do not
retain any state about individual mobile nodes until an authentic
Binding Update arrives. This is achieved through the use of the
nonces and node keys that are not specific to individual mobile
nodes. The cookies are specific, but they can be reconstructed
based on the home and care-of address information that arrives
with the Binding Update. This means that the correspondent nodes
are safe against memory exhaustion attacks except where on-path
attackers are concerned. Due to the use of symmetric cryptography,
the correspondent nodes are relatively safe against CPU resource
exhaustion attacks as well.
Nevertheless, as [29] describes, there are situations in which it is
impossible for the mobile and correspondent nodes to determine if
they actually need a binding or whether they just have been fooled
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 135]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
into believing so by an attacker. Therefore, it is necessary to
consider situations where such attacks are being made.
Even if route optimization is a very important optimization, it is
still only an optimization. A mobile node can communicate with a
correspondent node even if the correspondent refuses to accept any
Binding Updates. However, performance will suffer because packets
from the correspondent node to the mobile node will be routed via the
mobile's home agent rather than a more direct route. A correspondent
node can protect itself against some of these resource exhaustion
attacks as follows. If the correspondent node is flooded with a
large number of Binding Updates that fail the cryptographic integrity
checks, it can stop processing Binding Updates. If a correspondent
node finds that it is spending more resources on checking bogus
Binding Updates than it is likely to save by accepting genuine
Binding Updates, then it may reject some or all Binding Updates
without performing any cryptographic operations.
Layers above IP can usually provide additional information to decide
if there is a need to establish a binding with a specific peer. For
example, TCP knows if the node has a queue of data that it is trying
to send to a peer. An implementation of this specification is not
required to make use of information from higher protocol layers, but
some implementations are likely to be able to manage resources more
effectively by making use of such information.
We also require that all implementations MUST allow route
optimization to be administratively enabled or disabled. The default
SHOULD be enabled.
14.5. Tunneling via the Home Agent
Tunnels between the mobile node and the home agent can be
protected by ensuring proper use of source addresses, and optional
cryptographic protection. These procedures are discussed in
Section 5.3.
Binding Updates to the home agents are secure. When receiving
tunneled traffic the home agent verifies the outer IP address
corresponds to the current location of the mobile node. This
prevents attacks where the attacker is controlled by ingress
filtering. It also prevents attacks when the attacker does not know
the current care-of address of the mobile node. Attackers who know
the care-of address and are not controlled by ingress filtering could
still send traffic through the home agent. This includes attackers
on the same local link as the mobile node is currently on. But such
attackers could also send spoofed packets without using a tunnel.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 136]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Home agents and mobile nodes may use IPsec AH or ESP to protect
payload packets tunneled between themselves. This is useful to
protect communications against attackers on the path of the tunnel.
When site local home address are used, reverse tunneling can be used
to send site local traffic from another location. Administrators
should be aware of this when allowing such home addresses. In
particular, the outer IP address check described above is not
sufficient against all attackers. The use of encrypted tunnels is
particularly useful for this kind of home addresses.
14.6. Home Address Destination Option
When the mobile node sends packets directly to the correspondent
node, the Source Address field of the packet's IPv6 header is the
care-of address. Ingress filtering [24] works therefore in the usual
manner even for mobile nodes, as the Source Address is topologically
correct. The Home Address destination option is used to inform the
correspondent node of the mobile node's home address.
However, the care-of address in the Source Address field does
not survive in replies sent by the correspondent node unless
it has a binding for this mobile node. Also, not all attacker
tracing mechanisms work when packets are being reflected through
correspondent nodes using the Home Address option. For these
reasons, this specification restricts the use of the Home Address
option. It may only used when a binding has already been established
with the participation of the node at the home address, as described
in Sections 5.3 and 6.3. This prevents reflection attacks through
the use of the Home Address option. It also ensures that the
correspondent nodes reply to the same address as the mobile node
sends traffic from.
No special authentication of the Home Address option is required
beyond the above, except that if the IPv6 header of a packet is
covered by authentication, then that authentication MUST also cover
the Home Address option; this coverage is achieved automatically by
the definition of the Option Type code for the Home Address option
(Section 6.3), since it indicates that the option is included in the
authentication computation. Thus, even when authentication is used
in the IPv6 header, the security of the Source Address field in the
IPv6 header is not compromised by the presence of a Home Address
option. Without authentication of the packet, then any field in
the IPv6 header, including the Source Address field, and any other
parts of the packet, including the Home Address option, can be forged
or modified in transit. In this case, the contents of the Home
Address option is no more suspect than any other part of the packet.
Additionally, if a security association has been used to protect
the packet, we allow the Home Address option to be used even if the
correspondent node does not have a binding for this mobile node.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 137]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
14.7. Type 2 Routing Header
The definition of the Type 2 Routing Header is described in
Section 6.4. This definition and the associated processing rules
have been chosen so that the header can not be used for what is
traditionally viewed as source routing. In particular, the IPv6 the
Home Address in the routing header will always have to be assigned to
the home address of the receiving node. Otherwise the packet will be
dropped.
Generally, source routing has a number of security concerns. These
include the automatic reversal of unauthenticated source routes
(which is an issue for IPv4, but not for IPv6). Another concern is
the ability to use source routing to "jump" between nodes inside, as
well as outside a firewall. These security concerns are not issues
in Mobile IPv6, due to the rules mentioned above.
In essence the semantics of the type 2 routing header is the same as
a special form of IP-in-IP tunneling where the inner and outer source
addresses are the same.
This implies that a device which implements filtering of packets
should be able to distinguish between a Type 2 Routing header and
other Routing headers, as required in section 8.3. This is necessary
in order to allow Mobile IPv6 traffic while still having the option
to filter out other uses of Routing headers.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the members of the Mobile IP and IPng Working
Groups for their comments and suggestions on this work. We would
particularly like to thank (in alphabetical order) Fred Baker
(Cisco), Josh Broch (Carnegie Mellon University), Robert Chalmers
(University of California, Santa Barbara), Noel Chiappa (MIT),
Vijay Devarapalli (Nokia Research Center), Rich Draves (Microsoft
Research), Francis Dupont (ENST Bretagne), Thomas Eklund (Xelerated),
Jun-Ichiro Itojun Hagino (IIJ Research Laboratory), Krishna Kumar
(IBM Research), T.J. Kniveton (Nokia Research), Jiwoong Lee (KTF),
Aime Lerouzic (Bull S.A.), Vesa-Matti Mantyla (Ericsson), Thomas
Narten (IBM), Simon Nybroe (Ericsson Telebit), David Oran (Cisco),
Lars Henrik Petander (HUT), Basavaraj Patil (Nokia), Ken Powell
(Compaq), Phil Roberts (Motorola), Patrice Romand (Bull S.A.),
Jeff Schiller (MIT) Tom Soderlund (Nokia Research), Hesham Soliman
(Ericsson), Jim Solomon (RedBack Networks), Tapio Suihko (Technical
Research Center of Finland), Benny Van Houdt (University of Antwerp),
Jon-Olov Vatn (KTH), Alper Yegin (Sun Microsystems), and Xinhua Zhao
(Stanford University) for their detailed reviews of earlier versions
of this document. Their suggestions have helped to improve both the
design and presentation of the protocol.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 138]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
We would also like to thank the participants in the Mobile IPv6
testing event held at Nancy, France, September 15-17, 1999, for
their valuable feedback as a result of interoperability testing
of four Mobile IPv6 implementations coming from four different
organizations: Bull (AIX), Ericsson Telebit (FreeBSD), NEC
(FreeBSD), and INRIA (FreeBSD). Further, we would like to thank the
feedback from the implementors who participated in the Mobile IPv6
interoperability testing at Connectathons 2000, 2001, and 2002
in San Jose, California. Similarly, we would like to thank the
participants at the ETSI interoperability testing at ETSI, in Sophia
Antipolis, France, during October 2-6, 2000, including teams from
Compaq, Ericsson, INRIA, Nokia, and Technical University of Helsinki.
We would also like to thank Tuomas Aura, Mike Roe, and Greg
O'Shea (Microsoft), Pekka Nikander (Ericsson), Erik Nordmark (Sun
Microsystems), and Michael Thomas (Cisco) for the work on the return
routability protocols which eventually led to the procedures used in
this protocol. The procedures described in [30] were adopted in the
protocol.
Lastly, we must express our appreciation for the significant
contributions made by members of the Mobile IPv6 Security Design
Team, including (in alphabetical order) Gabriel Montenegro, Erik
Nordmark, (Sun Microsystems) and Pekka Nikander (Ericsson), who have
contributed volumes of text to this specification.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 139]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
References
[1] D. Eastlake, 3rd, S. Crocker, and J. Schiller. Randomness
Recommendations for Security. Request for Comments
(Informational) 1750, Internet Engineering Task Force, December
1994.
[2] S. Bradner. Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels. Request for Comments (Best Current Practice) 2119,
Internet Engineering Task Force, March 1997.
[3] R. Hinden and S. Deering. IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture.
Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2373, Internet
Engineering Task Force, July 1998.
[4] S. Kent and R. Atkinson. Security Architecture for the Internet
Protocol. Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2401,
Internet Engineering Task Force, November 1998.
[5] S. Kent and R. Atkinson. IP Authentication Header. Request for
Comments (Proposed Standard) 2402, Internet Engineering Task
Force, November 1998.
[6] S. Kent and R. Atkinson. IP Encapsulating Security Payload
(ESP). Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2406, Internet
Engineering Task Force, November 1998.
[7] D. Piper. The Internet IP Security Domain of Interpretation for
ISAKMP. Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2407, Internet
Engineering Task Force, November 1998.
[8] D. Maughan, M. Schertler, M. Schneider, and J. Turner. Internet
Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP).
Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2408, Internet
Engineering Task Force, November 1998.
[9] D. Harkins and D. Carrel. The Internet Key Exchange (IKE).
Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2409, Internet
Engineering Task Force, November 1998.
[10] T. Narten and H. Alvestrand. Guidelines for Writing an IANA
Considerations Section in RFCs. Request for Comments (Best
Current Practice) 2434, Internet Engineering Task Force, October
1998.
[11] S. Deering and R. Hinden. Internet Protocol, Version 6 (ipv6)
Specification. Request for Comments (Draft Standard) 2460,
Internet Engineering Task Force, December 1998.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 140]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
[12] T. Narten, E. Nordmark, and W. Simpson. Neighbor Discovery for
IP Version 6 (ipv6). Request for Comments (Draft Standard)
2461, Internet Engineering Task Force, December 1998.
[13] S. Thomson and T. Narten. IPv6 Stateless Address
Autoconfiguration. Request for Comments (Draft Standard) 2462,
Internet Engineering Task Force, December 1998.
[14] A. Conta and S. Deering. Internet Control Message Protocol
(ICMPv6) for the Internet protocol version 6 (ipv6)
specification. Request for Comments (Draft Standard) 2463,
Internet Engineering Task Force, December 1998.
[15] A. Conta and S. Deering. Generic Packet Tunneling in IPv6
Specification. Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2473,
Internet Engineering Task Force, December 1998.
[16] D. Johnson and S. Deering. Reserved IPv6 Subnet Anycast
Addresses. Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2526,
Internet Engineering Task Force, March 1999.
[17] T. Narten and R. Draves. Privacy Extensions for Stateless
Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6, January 2001.
[18] Editor J. Reynolds. Assigned Numbers: RFC 1700 is Replaced by
an On-line Database. Request for Comments (Informational) 3232,
Internet Engineering Task Force, January 2002.
[19] NIST. Secure hash standard. FIPS PUB 180-1, April 1995.
[20] C. Perkins. IP Mobility Support. Request for Comments
(Proposed Standard) 2002, Internet Engineering Task Force,
October 1996.
[21] C. Perkins. IP Encapsulation within IP. Request for Comments
(Proposed Standard) 2003, Internet Engineering Task Force,
October 1996.
[22] C. Perkins. Minimal Encapsulation within IP. Request for
Comments (Proposed Standard) 2004, Internet Engineering Task
Force, October 1996.
[23] C. Perkins and D. Johnson. Route optimization in mobile IP
(work in progress). Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task
Force, September 2001.
[24] P. Ferguson and D. Senie. Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating
Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP source address
spoofing. Request for Comments (Informational) 2267, Internet
Engineering Task Force, January 1998.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 141]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
[25] J. Bound, C. Perkins, M. Carney, and R. Droms. Dynamic host
configuration protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) (work in progress).
Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, January 2001.
[26] H. Krawczyk, M. Bellare, and R. Canetti. HMAC: Keyed-Hashing
for Message Authentication. Request for Comments
(Informational) 2104, Internet Engineering Task Force,
February 1997.
[27] P. V. Mockapetris. Domain names - concepts and facilities.
Request for Comments (Standard) 1034, Internet Engineering Task
Force, November 1987.
[28] P. V. Mockapetris. Domain names - implementation and
specification. Request for Comments (Standard) 1035, Internet
Engineering Task Force, November 1987.
[29] Tuomas Aura and Jari Arkko. MIPv6 BU attacks and defenses.
Internet Draft draft-aura-mipv6-bu-attacks-01.txt (Work In
Progress), IETF, February 2002.
[30] Michael Roe, Greg O'Shea, Tuomas Aura, and Jari Arkko.
Authentication of Mobile IPv6 binding updates and
acknowledgments. Internet Draft draft-roe-mobileip-updateauth-02.txt
(Work In Progress), IETF, February 2002.
[31] Pekka Savola. Security of IPv6 routing header and home address
options. Internet Draft draft-savola-ipv6-rh-ha-security-01.txt
(Work In Progress), IETF, November 2001.
[32] Erik Nordmark, Gabriel Montenegro, Pekka Nikander, and Jari
Arkko. Mobile ipv6 security design rationale. To appear, 2002.
[33] Erik Nordmark. Securing MIPv6 BUs using return routability
(BU3WAY). Internet Draft draft-nordmark-mobileip-bu3way-00.txt
(Work In Progress), IETF, November 2001.
References [1] through [19] are normative and others are informative.
A. State Machine for the Correspondent Binding Procedure
Home agents and correspondent nodes are stateless until a binding
is actually established. The mobile node, however, is responsible
for initiating the correspondent binding procedure, keeping track of
its state, handle retransmissions and failures, and completing the
procedure.
Section 11.6.2 defines the normative rules that the mobile node must
follow when performing the correspondent binding procedure. This
appendix specifies two additional, non-normative, state-machines
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 142]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
that illustrates the behaviour of the mobile node. The first
state machine describes the full correspondent binding, and the
second state machine describes the details relating to the return
routability procedure.
The state machines in this appendix do not attempt to define
how recently received cookies can be used when moving fast or
when performing deregistrations. They also do not attempt to
define how to behave when the mobile node may be simultaneously
attached to several locations. The state machines also assume that
acknowledgements are always required.
A.1. Main State Machine
The mobile node will keep the following states in its Binding List:
Idle
This is an imaginary state that refers to the situation that
the correspondent node in question does not appear in the
Binding List. In this state, all RR and binding related
messaging is silently ignored.
RRInit
This is a composite state. While in this state, the mobile
node has initiated the return routability procedure but has not
yet completed it, and has no existing binding. The internal
details of this state are described in the second state
machine, later in this appendix.
RRRedo
This is another composite state. While in this state, the
mobile node has an existing binding but has initiated the
return routability procedure in order to refresh it. The
internal details of this state are the same as above. In other
words, the same second state machine is again used.
RRDel
In this state, the mobile node intends to send a
de-registration Binding Update later but is first
waiting for a home cookie before this can be done. (Note that
if the mobile node is at home, it can use a home cookie also as
care-of cookie.)
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 143]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
WaitA
In this state, the mobile node has sent a Binding Update, and
is only waiting for the Binding Acknowledgement message to
arrive. There is no existing binding.
WaitAR
In this state, the mobile node has an existing binding, which
is being refreshed with a Binding Update. The mobile node is
only waiting for the Binding Acknowledgement message to arrive.
WaitD
In this state, the mobile node has sent a de-registration
Binding Update, and is only waiting for the Binding
Acknowledgement message to arrive.
Bound
In this state, the mobile node has established a binding with
the correspondent node. In this state, the mobile node can
send packets directly to the correspondent node.
The following events are possible:
Movement
The mobile node moves off the home-link, or to a new location.
(Note that in some cases the mobile node might not take
movements immediately in account for the purposes of route
optimization.)
Returning home
The mobile node moves back to its home link. (Note that
in some cases the mobile node may wish to give up route
optimization by telling the correspondent nodes that it has
returned home, when it has not.)
Valid BRR received
A valid Binding Refresh Request message has been received.
Valid BA received
A valid Binding Acknowledgement message has been received.
Valid BE received
A valid Binding Error message has been received.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 144]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Invalid MH Type received
A Mobility Header message with an unrecognized MH Type field
has been received.
ICMP Problem 1 received
An ICMP Parameter Problem Code 1 message has been
received. This can happen if the peer does not support this
specification.
Retransmission timer
A timer is set to expire when a retransmission of a packet
needs to be made.
Failure timer
A timer is set to expire when all retransmissions have failed.
The following additional conditions are also used:
Forward progress
There is reason to believe forward progress is being made.
Upper layer protocols such as TCP may provide hints to the IP
layer regarding recent successful communications.
Specific Status
Tests of the Status values received in a BE or BA message.
The following actions are possible:
Start RR
This is an abstract action that initiates the second state
machine.
Stop RR
This is an abstract action that stops the second state machine.
Send BU
Send a Binding Update.
Send BE
Send a Binding Error with status 2.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 145]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Set sequence number
Set the sequence number we use towards the correspondent node.
Start retransmission timer
Start the retransmission timer that controls the sending of
additional messages after the first message.
Start failure timer
Start the failure timer that controls how long we keep on
trying to retransmit.
Stop retransmission timer
Stop the retransmission timer.
Stop timers
Stop all timers.
The state machine for performing the correspondent binding procedure
is described below. We have omitted events that have no actions and
do not change the current state.
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
Idle Movement Start RR RRInit
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
RRInit RR Done Send BU, WaitA
Start retrans-
mission timer
RRInit Valid BE received and Stop RR Idle
status = 2
RRInit Movement Stop RR RRInit
Start RR
RRInit Returning home Stop RR Idle
RRInit ICMP Problem 1 received Stop timers Idle
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 146]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
RRRedo RR Done Send BU, WaitAR
Start retrans-
mission timer
RRRedo Valid BE received and Stop RR Idle
status = 2
RRRedo Movement Stop RR RRInit
Start RR
RRRedo Returning home Stop RR RRDel
RRRedo ICMP Problem 1 received Stop timers Idle
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
WaitA Valid BA received and Stop timers Bound
status < 128
WaitA Valid BA received and Set sequence WaitA
status = 141 number,
Send BU,
Restart
retransmission
timer,
Start failure
timer
WaitA Valid BA received and Start RR RRInit
status = 144 or 145
WaitA Valid BA received and Stop timers Idle
status anything else
WaitA Retransmission timer Send BU, WaitA
Start retrans-
mission timer
WaitA Valid BE received and Stop timers Idle
status = 2
WaitA Movement Start RR RRInit
WaitA Returning home Start RR RRDel
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
WaitAR Valid BA received and Stop timers Bound
status < 128
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 147]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
WaitAR Valid BA received and Set sequence WaitAR
status = 141 number,
Send BU,
Restart
retransmission
timer,
Start failure
timer
WaitAR Valid BA received and Start RR RRInit
status = 144 or 145
WaitAR Valid BA received and Stop timers Idle
status anything else
WaitAR Retransmission timer Send BU, WaitAR
Start retrans-
mission timer
WaitAR Valid BE received and Stop timers Idle
status = 2
WaitAR Movement Start RR RRInit
WaitAR Returning home Start RR RRDel
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
WaitD Valid BA received and Stop timers Idle
status < 128
WaitD Valid BA received and Set sequence WaitD
status = 141 number,
Send BU,
Stop timers,
Start retrans-
mission timer,
Start failure
timer
WaitD Valid BA received and Start RR RRDel
status = 144 or 145
WaitD Valid BA received and Stop timers Idle
status anything else
WaitD Retransmission timer Send BU, WaitD
Start retrans-
mission timer
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 148]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
WaitD Valid BE received Stop timers Idle
WaitD Movement Start RR RRInit
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
RRDel RR Done Send BU, WaitD
Stop timers,
Start retrans-
mission timer,
Start failure
timer
RRDel Valid BE received Stop RR Idle
RRDel Movement Stop RR, RRInit
Start RR
RRDel ICMP Problem 1 received (None) RRDel
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bound Valid BRR received Start RR RRRedo
Bound Returning home Start RR RRDel
Bound Movement Start RR RRInit
Bound Valid BE received and Start RR RRInit
status = 1 and no reason to
believe forward progress
is being made
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
(Any) RR Failed (None) Idle
(Any) Failure timer Stop retrans- Idle
mission timer
(Any) Invalid MH Type received Send BE (No change)
A.2. Return Routability Procedure
The second state machine describes how the return routability
procedure is performed. This state machine is used in three
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 149]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
situations in the first state machine, when creating a binding
for the first time, when refreshing an existing binding, and when
performing a deregistration.
The mobile node will keep the following states in its Binding List
for the return routability procedure:
Start
In this state, the return routability procedure is not active.
WaitHC
In this state, the mobile node has sent the Home Test Init
and Care-of Test Init messages, and is waiting for the Home
Test and Care-of Test messages to come back. It will also be
necessary to keep state of retransmissions for both.
WaitH
In this state, the mobile node has a recent Care-of Cookie and
is only waiting for the Home Test message to arrive.
WaitC
In this state, the mobile node has a recent Home Cookie and is
only waiting for the CoT message to arrive.
The following events are possible:
Start RR
This is an abstract message from the first state machine. It
indicates that the return routability procedure needs to be
run.
Start home RR
This a second abstract message from the first state machine.
It indicates that the return routability procedure needs to be
run, but only for the home address.
Stop RR
This is a third abstract message. It signifies that the return
routability procedure is no longer needed.
Valid HoT received
A valid Home Test message has been received.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 150]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Valid CoT received
A valid Care-of Test message has been received.
In addition, this state machine uses the Retransmission timer and
Failure timer events from the previous state machine.
The following actions are possible:
Send HoTI
Send the Home Test Init message.
Send CoTI
Send the Care-of Test message.
Store cookie and nonce index
Store the received cookie and nonce index in the appropriate
place in the Binding Update List.
RR Done
This is an abstract event and signals that the return
routability procedure has been completed.
RR Failed
This is an abstract event and signals that the return
routability procedure has failed.
In addition, this state machine uses the Start retransmission timer,
Start failure timer, Stop retransmission timer, and Stop timers
actions from the previous state machine.
The state machine is as follows:
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
Start Start RR Send HoTI, WaitHC
Send CoTI,
Start retrans-
mission timer,
Start failure
timer
Start Start home RR Send HoTI, WaitH
Start retrans-
mission timer,
Start failure
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 151]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
timer
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
WaitHC Valid HoT received Store cookie WaitC
and nonce
index
WaitHC Valid CoT received Store cookie WaitH
and nonce
index
WaitHC Retransmission timer Send HoTI, WaitHC
Send CoTI,
Start retrans-
mission timer
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
WaitH Valid HoT received Store cookie Start
and nonce
index,
Stop timers,
RR Done
WaitH Retransmission timer Send HoTI, WaitH
Start retrans-
mission timer
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
WaitC Valid CoT received Store cookie Start
and nonce
index,
Stop timers,
RR Done
WaitC Retransmission timer Send CoTI, WaitC
Start retrans-
mission timer
State Event Action New State
--------------------------------------------------------------
(Any) Stop RR Stop timers Start
(Any) Failure timer Stop retrans- Start
mission timer,
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 152]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
RR Failed
B. Changes from Previous Version of the Draft
This appendix briefly lists some of the major changes in this
draft relative to the previous version of this same draft,
draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6-17.txt:
- Substantial editorial modifications have taken place,
including the reduction of repetitive text at many places, the
reorganization of security threat and remaining vulnerability
discussion to the Security Considerations section, and so on.
- Mobility Header messages have been reformatted in various ways,
including the reduction of the size of the cookies.
- Recommendations for the RtrAdvInterval, MAX_RR_BINDING_LIFE, and
MAX_COOKIE_LIFE constants have been updated.
- Explanation on how to find the home agent's link-layer address
has been updated.
- Status code values for Binding Acknowledgment have been
renumbered.
- It is required that the (D) and the (L) bits have to be set when
requesting forwarding from a previous care-of address.
- Requirements for IPv6 nodes, routers, and so on have been written
on a new style and without giving a keyword for the support
of route optimization. It is expected that other documents
currently being prepared will have these keywords.
- Binding Error messages are now rate-limited.
- A new flag, the L bit has been introduced to Binding Update
message.
- The refresh field has been moved to a mobility option.
- The Home Address destination option is now used even with Binding
Updates to correspondent nodes. The option MAY used without an
existing binding if the packet has been protected with IPsec.
- The key Kbu is now used also to protect the Binding
Acknowledgement message.
- Both IPsec AH and ESP can be used to protect Binding Updates to
home agents.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 153]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
- Unsolicited prefix advertisement now stops after a solicitation
arrives to the home agent.
- Security is now required for all prefix discovery messages.
- Limitations regarding the generation of new home addresses for
securing Binding Updates to home agents have been described.
- The state machine for the mobile node has been reorganized.
- Padding and header length texts for the Mobility header have been
corrected.
- Option number and length fields have been corrected for many
mobility options.
- References to mobile router functionality have been removed.
- Acknowledgements section has been updated.
- The mobile cookies have been renamed to be the HoT cookie and the
CoT cookie.
- The Unique Identifier option is no longer specified for use with
the HoTI, CoTI, HoT, or CoT messages.
C. Future Extensions
C.1. Piggybacking
This document does not specify how to piggyback payload packets on
the binding related messages. However, it is envisioned that this
can be specified in a separate document when currently discussed
issues such as the interaction between piggybacking and IPsec are
fully resolved (see also Section C.3). The return routability
messages can indicate support for piggybacking with a new mobility
option.
C.2. Triangular Routing and Unverified Home Addresses
Due to the concerns about opening reflection attacks with the Home
Address destination option, this specification requires that this
option must be verified against the binding cache, i.e., there must
be a binding cache entry for the Home Address and Care-of Address.
Future extensions may be specified that allow the use of unverified
Home Address destination options in ways that do not introduce
security issues.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 154]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
C.3. New Authorization Methods beyond Return Routability
While the return routability procedure provides a good level
of security, there exists methods that have even higher levels
of security. Secondly, as discussed in Section 14.4, future
enhancements of IPv6 security may cause a need to improve also the
security of the return routability procedure.
Using IPsec as the sole method for authorizing Binding Updates
to correspondent nodes is also possible. The protection of the
Mobility Header for this purpose is easy, though one must ensure
that the IPsec SA was created with appropriate authorization to use
the home address referenced in the Binding Update. For instance,
a certificate used by IKE to create the security association might
contain the home address. A future specification may specify how
this is done.
C.4. Security and Dynamically Generated Home Addresses
A future version of this specification may include functionality
that allows the generation of new home addresses without requiring
pre-arranged security associations or certificates even for the new
addresses.
C.5. Remote Home Address Configuration
The method for initializing a mobile node's home addresses on
power-up or after an extended period of being disconnected from
the network is beyond the scope of this specification. Whatever
procedure is used should result in the mobile node having the same
stateless or stateful (e.g., DHCPv6) home address autoconfiguration
information it would have if it were attached to the home network.
Due to the possibility that the home network could be renumbered
while the mobile node is disconnected, a robust mobile node would not
rely solely on storing these addresses locally.
Such a mobile node could initialize by using the following procedure:
1. Generate a care-of address.
2. Query DNS for the home network's mobile agent anycast address.
3. Send a Home Agent Address Discovery Request message to the home
network.
4. Receive Home Agent Address Discovery Reply message.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 155]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
5. Select the most preferred home agent and establish a security
association between the mobile node's current care-of address and
the home agent for temporary use during initialization only.
6. Send a Home Prefix Solicitation message with the Request All
Prefixes flag set to the home agent from the mobile node's
care-of address.
7. Receive a Home Prefix Advertisement message from the home agent,
follow stateless address autoconfiguration rules to configure
home addresses for prefixes received.
8. Create a security association between the mobile node's home
address and the home agent.
9. Send a binding update(s) to the home agent to register the mobile
node's home addresses.
10. Receive binding acknowledgement(s) then begin normal
communications.
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 156]
INTERNET-DRAFT Mobility Support in IPv6 1 June 2002
Chairs' Addresses
The Working Group can be contacted via its current chairs:
Basavaraj Patil Phil Roberts
Nokia Corporation Megisto Corp.
6000 Connection Drive Suite 120
M/S M8-540 20251 Century Blvd
Irving, TX 75039 Germantown MD 20874
USA USA
Phone: +1 972-894-6709 Phone: +1 847-202-9314
Fax : +1 972-894-5349 Email: PRoberts@MEGISTO.com
EMail: Raj.Patil@nokia.com
Authors' Addresses
Questions about this document can also be directed to the authors:
David B. Johnson Charles E. Perkins
Rice University Nokia Research Center
Dept. of Computer Science, MS 132
6100 Main Street 313 Fairchild Drive
Houston, TX 77005-1892 Mountain View, CA 94043
USA USA
Phone: +1 713 348-3063 Phone: +1 650 625-2986
Fax: +1 713 348-5930 Fax: +1 650 625-2502
E-mail: dbj@cs.rice.edu E-mail: charliep@iprg.nokia.com
Jari Arkko
Ericsson
Jorvas 02420
Finland
Phone: +358 40 5079256
E-mail: jari.arkko@ericsson.com
Johnson, Perkins, Arkko Expires 1 December 2002 [Page 157]
