NETCONF Working Group K. Watsen
Internet-Draft Watsen Networks
Intended status: Standards Track H. Wang
Expires: December 9, 2019 Huawei
June 7, 2019
Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography
draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types-07
Abstract
This document defines YANG identities, typedefs, the groupings useful
for cryptographic applications.
Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)
This draft contains many placeholder values that need to be replaced
with finalized values at the time of publication. This note
summarizes all of the substitutions that are needed. No other RFC
Editor instructions are specified elsewhere in this document.
Artwork in this document contains shorthand references to drafts in
progress. Please apply the following replacements:
o "XXXX" --> the assigned RFC value for this draft
Artwork in this document contains placeholder values for the date of
publication of this draft. Please apply the following replacement:
o "2019-06-07" --> the publication date of this draft
The following Appendix section is to be removed prior to publication:
o Appendix B. Change Log
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 9, 2019.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. The Crypto Types Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
3.1. Support for Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
3.2. No Support for CRMF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
3.3. Access to Data Nodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.1. The IETF XML Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.2. The YANG Module Names Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
5. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
5.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
5.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Appendix A. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
A.1. The "asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping" Grouping . 49
A.2. The "generate-certificate-signing-request" Action . . . . 53
A.3. The "certificate-expiration" Notification . . . . . . . . 53
Appendix B. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
B.1. I-D to 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
B.2. 00 to 01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
B.3. 01 to 02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
B.4. 02 to 03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
B.5. 03 to 04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
B.6. 04 to 05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
B.7. 05 to 06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
B.8. 06 to 07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
1. Introduction
This document defines a YANG 1.1 [RFC7950] module specifying
identities, typedefs, and groupings useful for cryptography.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
2. The Crypto Types Module
2.1. Tree Diagram
This section provides a tree diagram [RFC8340] for the "ietf-crypto-
types" module. Only the groupings as represented, as tree diagrams
have no means to represent identities or typedefs.
module: ietf-crypto-types
grouping public-key-grouping:
+---- algorithm asymmetric-key-algorithm-ref
+---- public-key binary
grouping asymmetric-key-pair-grouping:
+---- algorithm asymmetric-key-algorithm-ref
+---- public-key binary
+---- private-key union
grouping trust-anchor-cert-grouping:
+---- cert? trust-anchor-cert-cms
+---n certificate-expiration
+--ro expiration-date ietf-yang-types:date-and-time
grouping trust-anchor-certs-grouping:
+---- cert* trust-anchor-cert-cms
+---n certificate-expiration
+--ro expiration-date ietf-yang-types:date-and-time
grouping end-entity-cert-grouping:
+---- cert? end-entity-cert-cms
+---n certificate-expiration
+--ro expiration-date ietf-yang-types:date-and-time
grouping end-entity-certs-grouping:
+---- cert* end-entity-cert-cms
+---n certificate-expiration
+--ro expiration-date ietf-yang-types:date-and-time
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
grouping asymmetric-key-pair-with-cert-grouping:
+---- algorithm
| asymmetric-key-algorithm-ref
+---- public-key binary
+---- private-key union
+---- cert? end-entity-cert-cms
+---n certificate-expiration
+--ro expiration-date ietf-yang-types:date-and-time
+---x generate-certificate-signing-request
+---- input
| +---w subject binary
| +---w attributes? binary
+---- output
+--ro certificate-signing-request binary
grouping asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping:
+---- algorithm
| asymmetric-key-algorithm-ref
+---- public-key binary
+---- private-key union
+---- certificates
| +---- certificate* [name]
| +---- name string
| +---- cert? end-entity-cert-cms
| +---n certificate-expiration
| +--ro expiration-date ietf-yang-types:date-and-time
+---x generate-certificate-signing-request
+---- input
| +---w subject binary
| +---w attributes? binary
+---- output
+--ro certificate-signing-request binary
2.2. YANG Module
This module has normative references to [RFC2404], [RFC3565],
[RFC3686], [RFC4106], [RFC4253], [RFC4279], [RFC4309], [RFC4494],
[RFC4543], [RFC4868], [RFC5280], [RFC5652], [RFC5656], [RFC6187],
[RFC6991], [RFC7919], [RFC8268], [RFC8332], [RFC8341], [RFC8422],
[RFC8446], and [ITU.X690.2015].
This module has an informational reference to [RFC2986], [RFC3174],
[RFC4493], [RFC5915], [RFC6125], [RFC6234], [RFC6239], [RFC6507],
[RFC8017], [RFC8032], [RFC8439].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-crypto-types@2019-06-07.yang"
module ietf-crypto-types {
yang-version 1.1;
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-crypto-types";
prefix ct;
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
}
import ietf-netconf-acm {
prefix nacm;
reference
"RFC 8341: Network Configuration Access Control Model";
}
organization
"IETF NETCONF (Network Configuration) Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netconf/>
WG List: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
Author: Kent Watsen <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Author: Wang Haiguang <wang.haiguang.shieldlab@huawei.com>";
description
"This module defines common YANG types for cryptographic
applications.
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified
as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with
or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and
subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified
BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's
Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC
itself for full legal notices.;
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL',
'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED',
'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document
are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119)
(RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.";
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
revision 2019-06-07 {
description
"Initial version";
reference
"RFC XXXX: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
}
/****************/
/* Features */
/****************/
feature generate-key {
description
"Indicates that the server supports the configuration
private key values using the 'value-to-be-generated'
prefix.";
}
feature hidden-key {
description
"Indicates that the server supports the configuration
of hidden private keys, whether by the using the
'value-to-be-generated-and-hidden' value or the
'value-to-be-hidden' prefix.";
}
/**************************************/
/* Identities for Hash Algorithms */
/**************************************/
identity hash-algorithm {
description
"A base identity for hash algorithm verification.";
}
identity sha-224 {
base hash-algorithm;
description
"The SHA-224 algorithm.";
reference
"RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms.";
}
identity sha-256 {
base hash-algorithm;
description
"The SHA-256 algorithm.";
reference
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
"RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms.";
}
identity sha-384 {
base hash-algorithm;
description
"The SHA-384 algorithm.";
reference
"RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms.";
}
identity sha-512 {
base hash-algorithm;
description
"The SHA-512 algorithm.";
reference
"RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms.";
}
/***********************************************/
/* Identities for Asymmetric Key Algorithms */
/***********************************************/
identity asymmetric-key-algorithm {
description
"Base identity from which all asymmetric key
encryption Algorithm.";
}
identity rsa1024 {
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
description
"The RSA algorithm using a 1024-bit key.";
reference
"RFC 8017:
PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
}
identity rsa2048 {
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
description
"The RSA algorithm using a 2048-bit key.";
reference
"RFC 8017:
PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
}
identity rsa3072 {
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
description
"The RSA algorithm using a 3072-bit key.";
reference
"RFC 8017:
PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
}
identity rsa4096 {
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
description
"The RSA algorithm using a 4096-bit key.";
reference
"RFC 8017:
PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
}
identity rsa7680 {
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
description
"The RSA algorithm using a 7680-bit key.";
reference
"RFC 8017:
PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
}
identity rsa15360 {
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
description
"The RSA algorithm using a 15360-bit key.";
reference
"RFC 8017:
PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
}
identity secp192r1 {
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
description
"The ECDSA algorithm using a NIST P192 Curve.";
reference
"RFC 6090:
Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms.
RFC 5480:
Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information.";
}
identity secp224r1 {
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
description
"The ECDSA algorithm using a NIST P224 Curve.";
reference
"RFC 6090:
Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms.
RFC 5480:
Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information.";
}
identity secp256r1 {
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
description
"The ECDSA algorithm using a NIST P256 Curve.";
reference
"RFC 6090:
Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms.
RFC 5480:
Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information.";
}
identity secp384r1 {
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
description
"The ECDSA algorithm using a NIST P384 Curve.";
reference
"RFC 6090:
Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms.
RFC 5480:
Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information.";
}
identity secp521r1 {
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
description
"The ECDSA algorithm using a NIST P521 Curve.";
reference
"RFC 6090:
Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms.
RFC 5480:
Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information.";
}
/*************************************/
/* Identities for MAC Algorithms */
/*************************************/
identity mac-algorithm {
description
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
"A base identity for mac generation.";
}
identity hmac-sha1 {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating MAC using SHA1 hash function";
reference
"RFC 3174: US Secure Hash Algorithm 1 (SHA1)";
}
identity hmac-sha1-96 {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating MAC using SHA1 hash function";
reference
"RFC 2404: The Use of HMAC-SHA-1-96 within ESP and AH";
}
identity hmac-sha2-224 {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating MAC using SHA2 hash function";
reference
"RFC 6234:
US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and
HKDF)";
}
identity hmac-sha2-256 {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating MAC using SHA2 hash function";
reference
"RFC 6234:
US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and
HKDF)";
}
identity hmac-sha2-256-128 {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating a 256 bits MAC using SHA2 hash function and
truncate it to 128 bits";
reference
"RFC 4868:
Using HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-384, and HMAC-SHA-512
with IPsec";
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
}
identity hmac-sha2-384 {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating MAC using SHA2 hash function";
reference
"RFC 6234:
US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and
HKDF)";
}
identity hmac-sha2-384-192 {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating a 384 bits MAC using SHA2 hash function and
truncate it to 192 bits";
reference
"RFC 4868:
Using HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-384, and HMAC-SHA-512 with
IPsec";
}
identity hmac-sha2-512 {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating MAC using SHA2 hash function";
reference
"RFC 6234:
US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and
HKDF)";
}
identity hmac-sha2-512-256 {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating a 512 bits MAC using SHA2 hash function and
truncating it to 256 bits";
reference
"RFC 4868:
Using HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-384, and HMAC-SHA-512 with
IPsec";
}
identity aes-128-gmac {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating MAC using the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
Galois Message Authentication Code (GMAC) as a mechanism to
provide data origin authentication";
reference
"RFC 4543:
The Use of Galois Message Authentication Code (GMAC) in
IPsec ESP and AH";
}
identity aes-192-gmac {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating MAC using the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
Galois Message Authentication Code (GMAC) as a mechanism to
provide data origin authentication";
reference
"RFC 4543:
The Use of Galois Message Authentication Code (GMAC) in
IPsec ESP and AH";
}
identity aes-256-gmac {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating MAC using the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
Galois Message Authentication Code (GMAC) as a mechanism to
provide data origin authentication";
reference
"RFC 4543:
The Use of Galois Message Authentication Code (GMAC) in
IPsec ESP and AH";
}
identity aes-cmac-96 {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating MAC using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
Cipher-based Message Authentication Code (CMAC)";
reference
"RFC 4494: The AES-CMAC-96 Algorithm and its Use with IPsec";
}
identity aes-cmac-128 {
base mac-algorithm;
description
"Generating MAC using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
Cipher-based Message Authentication Code (CMAC)";
reference
"RFC 4493: The AES-CMAC Algorithm";
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
}
/********************************************/
/* Identities for Encryption Algorithms */
/********************************************/
identity encryption-algorithm {
description
"A base identity for encryption algorithm.";
}
identity aes-128-cbc {
base encryption-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CBC mode with a key
length of 128 bits";
reference
"RFC 3565:
Use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Encryption
Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
}
identity aes-192-cbc {
base encryption-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CBC mode with a key
length of 192 bits";
reference
"RFC 3565:
Use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Encryption
Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
}
identity aes-256-cbc {
base encryption-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CBC mode with a key
length of 256 bits";
reference
"RFC 3565:
Use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Encryption
Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
}
identity aes-128-ctr {
base encryption-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CTR mode with a key
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
length of 128 bits";
reference
"RFC 3686:
Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Counter Mode with
IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)";
}
identity aes-192-ctr {
base encryption-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CTR mode with a key
length of 192 bits";
reference
"RFC 3686:
Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Counter Mode with
IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)";
}
identity aes-256-ctr {
base encryption-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CTR mode with a key
length of 256 bits";
reference
"RFC 3686:
Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Counter Mode with
IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)";
}
/****************************************************/
/* Identities for Encryption and MAC Algorithms */
/****************************************************/
identity encryption-and-mac-algorithm {
description
"A base identity for encryption and MAC algorithm.";
}
identity aes-128-ccm {
base encryption-and-mac-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CCM mode with a key
length of 128 bits; it can also be used for generating MAC";
reference
"RFC 4309:
Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) CCM Mode with
IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)";
}
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
identity aes-192-ccm {
base encryption-and-mac-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CCM mode with a key
length of 192 bits; it can also be used for generating MAC";
reference
"RFC 4309:
Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) CCM Mode with
IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)";
}
identity aes-256-ccm {
base encryption-and-mac-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CCM mode with a key
length of 256 bits; it can also be used for generating MAC";
reference
"RFC 4309:
Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) CCM Mode with
IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)";
}
identity aes-128-gcm {
base encryption-and-mac-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in GCM mode with a key
length of 128 bits; it can also be used for generating MAC";
reference
"RFC 4106:
The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) in IPsec Encapsulating
Security Payload (ESP)";
}
identity aes-192-gcm {
base encryption-and-mac-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in GCM mode with a key
length of 192 bits; it can also be used for generating MAC";
reference
"RFC 4106:
The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) in IPsec Encapsulating
Security Payload (ESP)";
}
identity mac-aes-256-gcm {
base encryption-and-mac-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with AES algorithm in GCM mode with a key
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
length of 128 bits; it can also be used for generating MAC";
reference
"RFC 4106:
The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) in IPsec Encapsulating
Security Payload (ESP)";
}
identity chacha20-poly1305 {
base encryption-and-mac-algorithm;
description
"Encrypt message with chacha20 algorithm and generate MAC with
POLY1305; it can also be used for generating MAC";
reference
"RFC 8439: ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for IETF Protocols";
}
/******************************************/
/* Identities for signature algorithm */
/******************************************/
identity signature-algorithm {
description
"A base identity for asymmetric key encryption algorithm.";
}
identity dsa-sha1 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using DSA algorithm with SHA1 hash
algorithm";
reference
"RFC 4253: The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol";
}
identity rsassa-pkcs1-sha1 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 with the SHA1
hash algorithm.";
reference
"RFC 4253: The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol";
}
identity rsassa-pkcs1-sha256 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 with the
SHA256 hash algorithm.";
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
reference
"RFC 8332:
Use of RSA Keys with SHA-256 and SHA-512 in the Secure Shell
(SSH) Protocol
RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity rsassa-pkcs1-sha384 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 with the
SHA384 hash algorithm.";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity rsassa-pkcs1-sha512 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 with the
SHA512 hash algorithm.";
reference
"RFC 8332:
Use of RSA Keys with SHA-256 and SHA-512 in the Secure Shell
(SSH) Protocol
RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity rsassa-pss-rsae-sha256 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask generation
function 1 and SHA256 hash algorithm. If the public key is
carried in an X.509 certificate, it MUST use the rsaEncryption
OID";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity rsassa-pss-rsae-sha384 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask generation
function 1 and SHA384 hash algorithm. If the public key is
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
carried in an X.509 certificate, it MUST use the rsaEncryption
OID";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity rsassa-pss-rsae-sha512 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask generation
function 1 and SHA512 hash algorithm. If the public key is
carried in an X.509 certificate, it MUST use the rsaEncryption
OID";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity rsassa-pss-pss-sha256 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask generation
function 1 and SHA256 hash algorithm. If the public key is
carried in an X.509 certificate, it MUST use the RSASSA-PSS
OID";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity rsassa-pss-pss-sha384 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask generation
function 1 and SHA256 hash algorithm. If the public key is
carried in an X.509 certificate, it MUST use the RSASSA-PSS
OID";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity rsassa-pss-pss-sha512 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask generation
function 1 and SHA256 hash algorithm. If the public key is
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
carried in an X.509 certificate, it MUST use the RSASSA-PSS
OID";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity ecdsa-secp256r1-sha256 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using ECDSA with curve name secp256r1
and SHA256 hash algorithm.";
reference
"RFC 5656: Elliptic Curve Algorithm Integration in the
Secure Shell Transport Layer
RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity ecdsa-secp384r1-sha384 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using ECDSA with curve name secp384r1
and SHA384 hash algorithm.";
reference
"RFC 5656: Elliptic Curve Algorithm Integration in the
Secure Shell Transport Layer
RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity ecdsa-secp521r1-sha512 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using ECDSA with curve name secp521r1
and SHA512 hash algorithm.";
reference
"RFC 5656: Elliptic Curve Algorithm Integration in the
Secure Shell Transport Layer
RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity ed25519 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using EdDSA as defined in RFC 8032 or
its successors.";
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
reference
"RFC 8032: Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)";
}
identity ed448 {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using EdDSA as defined in RFC 8032 or
its successors.";
reference
"RFC 8032: Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)";
}
identity eccsi {
base signature-algorithm;
description
"The signature algorithm using ECCSI signature as defined in
RFC 6507.";
reference
"RFC 6507:
Elliptic Curve-Based Certificateless Signatures for
Identity-based Encryption (ECCSI)";
}
/**********************************************/
/* Identities for key exchange algorithms */
/**********************************************/
identity key-exchange-algorithm {
description
"A base identity for Diffie-Hellman based key exchange
algorithm.";
}
identity psk-only {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Using Pre-shared key for authentication and key exchange";
reference
"RFC 4279:
Pre-Shared Key cipher suites for Transport Layer Security
(TLS)";
}
identity dhe-ffdhe2048 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with 2048 bit
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
finite field";
reference
"RFC 7919:
Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters
for Transport Layer Security (TLS)";
}
identity dhe-ffdhe3072 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with 3072 bit finite
field";
reference
"RFC 7919:
Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters
for Transport Layer Security (TLS)";
}
identity dhe-ffdhe4096 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with 4096 bit
finite field";
reference
"RFC 7919:
Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters
for Transport Layer Security (TLS)";
}
identity dhe-ffdhe6144 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with 6144 bit
finite field";
reference
"RFC 7919:
Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters
for Transport Layer Security (TLS)";
}
identity dhe-ffdhe8192 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with 8192 bit
finite field";
reference
"RFC 7919:
Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
for Transport Layer Security (TLS)";
}
identity psk-dhe-ffdhe2048 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Key exchange using pre-shared key with Diffie-Hellman key
generation mechanism, where the DH group is FFDHE2048";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity psk-dhe-ffdhe3072 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Key exchange using pre-shared key with Diffie-Hellman key
generation mechanism, where the DH group is FFDHE3072";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity psk-dhe-ffdhe4096 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Key exchange using pre-shared key with Diffie-Hellman key
generation mechanism, where the DH group is FFDHE4096";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity psk-dhe-ffdhe6144 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Key exchange using pre-shared key with Diffie-Hellman key
generation mechanism, where the DH group is FFDHE6144";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity psk-dhe-ffdhe8192 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Key exchange using pre-shared key with Diffie-Hellman key
generation mechanism, where the DH group is FFDHE8192";
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity ecdhe-secp256r1 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with elliptic group
over curve secp256r1";
reference
"RFC 8422:
Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for
Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier";
}
identity ecdhe-secp384r1 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with elliptic group
over curve secp384r1";
reference
"RFC 8422:
Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for
Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier";
}
identity ecdhe-secp521r1 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with elliptic group
over curve secp521r1";
reference
"RFC 8422:
Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for
Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier";
}
identity ecdhe-x25519 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with elliptic group
over curve x25519";
reference
"RFC 8422:
Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for
Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier";
}
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
identity ecdhe-x448 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with elliptic group
over curve x448";
reference
"RFC 8422:
Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for
Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier";
}
identity psk-ecdhe-secp256r1 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Key exchange using pre-shared key with elliptic group-based
Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange over curve secp256r1";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity psk-ecdhe-secp384r1 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Key exchange using pre-shared key with elliptic group-based
Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange over curve secp384r1";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity psk-ecdhe-secp521r1 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Key exchange using pre-shared key with elliptic group-based
Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange over curve secp521r1";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity psk-ecdhe-x25519 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Key exchange using pre-shared key with elliptic group-based
Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange over curve x25519";
reference
"RFC 8446:
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity psk-ecdhe-x448 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Key exchange using pre-shared key with elliptic group-based
Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange over curve x448";
reference
"RFC 8446:
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3";
}
identity diffie-hellman-group14-sha1 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Using DH group14 and SHA1 for key exchange";
reference
"RFC 4253: The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol";
}
identity diffie-hellman-group14-sha256 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Using DH group14 and SHA256 for key exchange";
reference
"RFC 8268:
More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-Hellman (DH)
Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell (SSH)";
}
identity diffie-hellman-group15-sha512 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Using DH group15 and SHA512 for key exchange";
reference
"RFC 8268:
More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-Hellman (DH)
Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell (SSH)";
}
identity diffie-hellman-group16-sha512 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Using DH group16 and SHA512 for key exchange";
reference
"RFC 8268:
More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-Hellman (DH)
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell (SSH)";
}
identity diffie-hellman-group17-sha512 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Using DH group17 and SHA512 for key exchange";
reference
"RFC 8268:
More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-Hellman (DH)
Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell (SSH)";
}
identity diffie-hellman-group18-sha512 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Using DH group18 and SHA512 for key exchange";
reference
"RFC 8268:
More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-Hellman (DH)
Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell (SSH)";
}
identity ecdh-sha2-secp256r1 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over curve
secp256r1 and using SHA2 for MAC generation";
reference
"RFC 6239: Suite B Cryptographic Suites for Secure Shell
(SSH)";
}
identity ecdh-sha2-secp384r1 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over curve
secp384r1 and using SHA2 for MAC generation";
reference
"RFC 6239: Suite B Cryptographic Suites for Secure Shell
(SSH)";
}
identity rsaes-oaep {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
"RSAES-OAEP combines the RSAEP and RSADP primitives with the
EME-OAEP encoding method";
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
reference
"RFC 8017:
PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
}
identity rsaes-pkcs1-v1_5 {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
description
" RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 combines the RSAEP and RSADP primitives
with the EME-PKCS1-v1_5 encoding method";
reference
"RFC 8017:
PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
}
/**********************************************************/
/* Typedefs for identityrefs to above base identities */
/**********************************************************/
typedef hash-algorithm-ref {
type identityref {
base hash-algorithm;
}
description
"This typedef enables importing modules to easily define an
identityref to the 'hash-algorithm' base identity.";
}
typedef signature-algorithm-ref {
type identityref {
base signature-algorithm;
}
description
"This typedef enables importing modules to easily define an
identityref to the 'signature-algorithm' base identity.";
}
typedef mac-algorithm-ref {
type identityref {
base mac-algorithm;
}
description
"This typedef enables importing modules to easily define an
identityref to the 'mac-algorithm' base identity.";
}
typedef encryption-algorithm-ref {
type identityref {
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
base encryption-algorithm;
}
description
"This typedef enables importing modules to easily define an
identityref to the 'encryption-algorithm'
base identity.";
}
typedef encryption-and-mac-algorithm-ref {
type identityref {
base encryption-and-mac-algorithm;
}
description
"This typedef enables importing modules to easily define an
identityref to the 'encryption-and-mac-algorithm'
base identity.";
}
typedef asymmetric-key-algorithm-ref {
type identityref {
base asymmetric-key-algorithm;
}
description
"This typedef enables importing modules to easily define an
identityref to the 'asymmetric-key-algorithm'
base identity.";
}
typedef key-exchange-algorithm-ref {
type identityref {
base key-exchange-algorithm;
}
description
"This typedef enables importing modules to easily define an
identityref to the 'key-exchange-algorithm' base identity.";
}
/***************************************************/
/* Typedefs for ASN.1 structures from RFC 5280 */
/***************************************************/
typedef x509 {
type binary;
description
"A Certificate structure, as specified in RFC 5280,
encoded using ASN.1 distinguished encoding rules (DER),
as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
reference
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
"RFC 5280:
Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile
ITU-T X.690:
Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
Encoding Rules (DER).";
}
typedef crl {
type binary;
description
"A CertificateList structure, as specified in RFC 5280,
encoded using ASN.1 distinguished encoding rules (DER),
as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
reference
"RFC 5280:
Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile
ITU-T X.690:
Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
Encoding Rules (DER).";
}
/***********************************************/
/* Typedefs for ASN.1 structures from 5652 */
/***********************************************/
typedef cms {
type binary;
description
"A ContentInfo structure, as specified in RFC 5652,
encoded using ASN.1 distinguished encoding rules (DER),
as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
reference
"RFC 5652:
Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
ITU-T X.690:
Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
Encoding Rules (DER).";
}
typedef data-content-cms {
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
type cms;
description
"A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
data content type, as described by Section 4 in RFC 5652.";
reference
"RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
}
typedef signed-data-cms {
type cms;
description
"A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
signed-data content type, as described by Section 5 in
RFC 5652.";
reference
"RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
}
typedef enveloped-data-cms {
type cms;
description
"A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
enveloped-data content type, as described by Section 6
in RFC 5652.";
reference
"RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
}
typedef digested-data-cms {
type cms;
description
"A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
digested-data content type, as described by Section 7
in RFC 5652.";
reference
"RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
}
typedef encrypted-data-cms {
type cms;
description
"A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
encrypted-data content type, as described by Section 8
in RFC 5652.";
reference
"RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
}
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
typedef authenticated-data-cms {
type cms;
description
"A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
authenticated-data content type, as described by Section 9
in RFC 5652.";
reference
"RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
}
/***************************************************/
/* Typedefs for structures related to RFC 4253 */
/***************************************************/
typedef ssh-host-key {
type binary;
description
"The binary public key data for this SSH key, as
specified by RFC 4253, Section 6.6, i.e.:
string certificate or public key format
identifier
byte[n] key/certificate data.";
reference
"RFC 4253: The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer
Protocol";
}
/*********************************************************/
/* Typedefs for ASN.1 structures related to RFC 5280 */
/*********************************************************/
typedef trust-anchor-cert-x509 {
type x509;
description
"A Certificate structure that MUST encode a self-signed
root certificate.";
}
typedef end-entity-cert-x509 {
type x509;
description
"A Certificate structure that MUST encode a certificate
that is neither self-signed nor having Basic constraint
CA true.";
}
/*********************************************************/
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
/* Typedefs for ASN.1 structures related to RFC 5652 */
/*********************************************************/
typedef trust-anchor-cert-cms {
type signed-data-cms;
description
"A CMS SignedData structure that MUST contain the chain of
X.509 certificates needed to authenticate the certificate
presented by a client or end-entity.
The CMS MUST contain only a single chain of certificates.
The client or end-entity certificate MUST only authenticate
to last intermediate CA certificate listed in the chain.
In all cases, the chain MUST include a self-signed root
certificate. In the case where the root certificate is
itself the issuer of the client or end-entity certificate,
only one certificate is present.
This CMS structure MAY (as applicable where this type is
used) also contain suitably fresh (as defined by local
policy) revocation objects with which the device can
verify the revocation status of the certificates.
This CMS encodes the degenerate form of the SignedData
structure that is commonly used to disseminate X.509
certificates and revocation objects (RFC 5280).";
reference
"RFC 5280:
Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile.";
}
typedef end-entity-cert-cms {
type signed-data-cms;
description
"A CMS SignedData structure that MUST contain the end
entity certificate itself, and MAY contain any number
of intermediate certificates leading up to a trust
anchor certificate. The trust anchor certificate
MAY be included as well.
The CMS MUST contain a single end entity certificate.
The CMS MUST NOT contain any spurious certificates.
This CMS structure MAY (as applicable where this type is
used) also contain suitably fresh (as defined by local
policy) revocation objects with which the device can
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
verify the revocation status of the certificates.
This CMS encodes the degenerate form of the SignedData
structure that is commonly used to disseminate X.509
certificates and revocation objects (RFC 5280).";
reference
"RFC 5280:
Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile.";
}
/**********************************************/
/* Groupings for keys and/or certificates */
/**********************************************/
grouping public-key-grouping {
description
"A public key and its associated algorithm.";
leaf algorithm {
nacm:default-deny-write;
type asymmetric-key-algorithm-ref;
mandatory true;
description
"Identifies the key's algorithm.";
reference
"RFC CCCC: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
}
leaf public-key {
nacm:default-deny-write;
type binary;
mandatory true;
description
"The binary value of the public key. The interpretation of
the value is defined by 'algorithm'. For example, a DSA
key is an integer, an RSA key is represented as RSAPublicKey
per RFC 8017, and an ECC key is represented using the
'publicKey' described in RFC 5915.";
reference
"RFC 8017: Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) #1:
RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.
RFC 5915: Elliptic Curve Private Key Structure.";
}
}
grouping asymmetric-key-pair-grouping {
description
"A private key and its associated public key and algorithm.";
uses public-key-grouping;
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
leaf private-key {
nacm:default-deny-all;
type union {
type binary;
type string {
pattern
'permanently-hidden'
+ '|encrypted-by:.*:[A-Za-z0-9+/]+[=]{1,3}'
+ '|value-to-be-generated(-and-hidden)?'
+ '|value-to-be-hidden:[A-Za-z0-9+/]+[=]{1,3}';
}
}
mandatory true;
description
"Either the binary value of the private key or a value
indentifing special input and output values described
below. The key's value is interpreted by the 'algorithm'.
For example, a DSA key is an integer, an RSA key is
represented as RSAPrivateKey as defined in RFC 8017, and
an ECC key is represented as ECPrivateKey as defined in
RFC 5915.
Special input and output values:
permanently-hidden
Primarily an output value indicating that the private
key value is not available in any form. The only time
this value MAY be used as a input value is when it is
being used to copy a manufacturer-generated value from
<operational> to <running>.
encrypted-by:*:[A-Za-z0-9+/]+[=]{1,3}
Primarily an output value indicating that the private
key is encrypted using another key, identified by the
'by' attribute. The only time this value MAY be used
as a input value is when it is being used to copy a
manufacturer-generated value from <operational> to
<running>. Following the prefix is the base64-encoded
value of the encrypted private key.
value-to-be-generated(-and-hidden)?
An input value used to request the system to generate,
and optionally hide, the public/private key pair. When
used, the 'public-key' value MUST be empty (zero bytes).
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
Without the optional '-and-hidden' postfix, the generated
key pair is stored in the configuration data store as if
the values had been configured by the client.
With the optional '-and-hidden' postfix, the generated
key pair is 'hidden' and thereafter be reported using
either 'permanently-hidden' or 'encrypted-by:*:'.
The server's support for 'value-to-be-generated' input
value is known by the 'generate-key' feature, and the
server's support for 'value-to-be-generated-and-hidden'
value is known by the combination of both the 'generate-
key' and 'hidden-key' features.
value-to-be-hidden:[A-Za-z0-9+/]+[=]{1,3}
An input value used to request the system to store the
provided private key such that it will thereafter be
reported using either as 'permanently-hidden' or
'encrypted-by:*:'. Following the prefix is the
base64-encoded value of the private key.
The server's support for 'value-to-be-hidden' input
value is known by the 'hidden-key' feature.";
reference
"RFC 8017: Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) #1:
RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.
RFC 5915: Elliptic Curve Private Key Structure.";
}
}
grouping trust-anchor-cert-grouping {
description
"A trust anchor certificate, and a notification for when
it is about to (or already has) expire.";
leaf cert {
nacm:default-deny-write;
type trust-anchor-cert-cms;
description
"The binary certificate data for this certificate.";
reference
"RFC YYYY: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
}
notification certificate-expiration {
description
"A notification indicating that the configured certificate
is either about to expire or has already expired. When to
send notifications is an implementation specific decision,
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
but it is RECOMMENDED that a notification be sent once a
month for 3 months, then once a week for four weeks, and
then once a day thereafter until the issue is resolved.";
leaf expiration-date {
type yang:date-and-time;
mandatory true;
description
"Identifies the expiration date on the certificate.";
}
}
}
grouping trust-anchor-certs-grouping {
description
"A list of trust anchor certificates, and a notification
for when one is about to (or already has) expire.";
leaf-list cert {
nacm:default-deny-write;
type trust-anchor-cert-cms;
description
"The binary certificate data for this certificate.";
reference
"RFC YYYY: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
}
notification certificate-expiration {
description
"A notification indicating that the configured certificate
is either about to expire or has already expired. When to
send notifications is an implementation specific decision,
but it is RECOMMENDED that a notification be sent once a
month for 3 months, then once a week for four weeks, and
then once a day thereafter until the issue is resolved.";
leaf expiration-date {
type yang:date-and-time;
mandatory true;
description
"Identifies the expiration date on the certificate.";
}
}
}
grouping end-entity-cert-grouping {
description
"An end entity certificate, and a notification for when
it is about to (or already has) expire. Implementations
SHOULD assert that, where used, the end entity certificate
contains the expected public key.";
leaf cert {
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
nacm:default-deny-write;
type end-entity-cert-cms;
description
"The binary certificate data for this certificate.";
reference
"RFC YYYY: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
}
notification certificate-expiration {
description
"A notification indicating that the configured certificate
is either about to expire or has already expired. When to
send notifications is an implementation specific decision,
but it is RECOMMENDED that a notification be sent once a
month for 3 months, then once a week for four weeks, and
then once a day thereafter until the issue is resolved.";
leaf expiration-date {
type yang:date-and-time;
mandatory true;
description
"Identifies the expiration date on the certificate.";
}
}
}
grouping end-entity-certs-grouping {
description
"A list of end entity certificates, and a notification for
when one is about to (or already has) expire.";
leaf-list cert {
nacm:default-deny-write;
type end-entity-cert-cms;
description
"The binary certificate data for this certificate.";
reference
"RFC YYYY: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
}
notification certificate-expiration {
description
"A notification indicating that the configured certificate
is either about to expire or has already expired. When to
send notifications is an implementation specific decision,
but it is RECOMMENDED that a notification be sent once a
month for 3 months, then once a week for four weeks, and
then once a day thereafter until the issue is resolved.";
leaf expiration-date {
type yang:date-and-time;
mandatory true;
description
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
"Identifies the expiration date on the certificate.";
}
}
}
grouping asymmetric-key-pair-with-cert-grouping {
description
"A private/public key pair and an associated certificate.
Implementations SHOULD assert that certificates contain
the matching public key.";
uses asymmetric-key-pair-grouping;
uses end-entity-cert-grouping;
action generate-certificate-signing-request {
nacm:default-deny-all;
description
"Generates a certificate signing request structure for
the associated asymmetric key using the passed subject
and attribute values. The specified assertions need
to be appropriate for the certificate's use. For
example, an entity certificate for a TLS server
SHOULD have values that enable clients to satisfy
RFC 6125 processing.";
input {
leaf subject {
type binary;
mandatory true;
description
"The 'subject' field per the CertificationRequestInfo
structure as specified by RFC 2986, Section 4.1
encoded using the ASN.1 distinguished encoding
rules (DER), as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
reference
"RFC 2986:
PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
Specification Version 1.7.
ITU-T X.690:
Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
Encoding Rules (DER).";
}
leaf attributes {
type binary; // FIXME: does this need to be mandatory?
description
"The 'attributes' field from the structure
CertificationRequestInfo as specified by RFC 2986,
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
Section 4.1 encoded using the ASN.1 distinguished
encoding rules (DER), as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
reference
"RFC 2986:
PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
Specification Version 1.7.
ITU-T X.690:
Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
Encoding Rules (DER).";
}
}
output {
leaf certificate-signing-request {
type binary;
mandatory true;
description
"A CertificationRequest structure as specified by
RFC 2986, Section 4.2 encoded using the ASN.1
distinguished encoding rules (DER), as specified
in ITU-T X.690.";
reference
"RFC 2986:
PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
Specification Version 1.7.
ITU-T X.690:
Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
Encoding Rules (DER).";
}
}
} // generate-certificate-signing-request
} // asymmetric-key-pair-with-cert-grouping
grouping asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping {
description
"A private/public key pair and associated certificates.
Implementations SHOULD assert that certificates contain
the matching public key.";
uses asymmetric-key-pair-grouping;
container certificates {
nacm:default-deny-write;
description
"Certificates associated with this asymmetric key.
More than one certificate supports, for instance,
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
a TPM-protected asymmetric key that has both IDevID
and LDevID certificates associated.";
list certificate {
key "name";
description
"A certificate for this asymmetric key.";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"An arbitrary name for the certificate. If the name
matches the name of a certificate that exists
independently in <operational> (i.e., an IDevID),
then the 'cert' node MUST NOT be configured.";
}
uses end-entity-cert-grouping;
}
} // certificates
action generate-certificate-signing-request {
nacm:default-deny-all;
description
"Generates a certificate signing request structure for
the associated asymmetric key using the passed subject
and attribute values. The specified assertions need
to be appropriate for the certificate's use. For
example, an entity certificate for a TLS server
SHOULD have values that enable clients to satisfy
RFC 6125 processing.";
input {
leaf subject {
type binary;
mandatory true;
description
"The 'subject' field per the CertificationRequestInfo
structure as specified by RFC 2986, Section 4.1
encoded using the ASN.1 distinguished encoding
rules (DER), as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
reference
"RFC 2986:
PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
Specification Version 1.7.
ITU-T X.690:
Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
Encoding Rules (DER).";
}
leaf attributes {
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
type binary; // FIXME: does this need to be mandatory?
description
"The 'attributes' field from the structure
CertificationRequestInfo as specified by RFC 2986,
Section 4.1 encoded using the ASN.1 distinguished
encoding rules (DER), as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
reference
"RFC 2986:
PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
Specification Version 1.7.
ITU-T X.690:
Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
Encoding Rules (DER).";
}
}
output {
leaf certificate-signing-request {
type binary;
mandatory true;
description
"A CertificationRequest structure as specified by
RFC 2986, Section 4.2 encoded using the ASN.1
distinguished encoding rules (DER), as specified
in ITU-T X.690.";
reference
"RFC 2986:
PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
Specification Version 1.7.
ITU-T X.690:
Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
Encoding Rules (DER).";
}
}
} // generate-certificate-signing-request
} // asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping
}
<CODE ENDS>
3. Security Considerations
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
3.1. Support for Algorithms
In order to use YANG identities for algorithm identifiers, only the
most commonly used RSA key lengths are supported for the RSA
algorithm. Additional key lengths can be defined in another module
or added into a future version of this document.
This document limits the number of elliptical curves supported. This
was done to match industry trends and IETF best practice (e.g.,
matching work being done in TLS 1.3). If additional algorithms are
needed, they can be defined by another module or added into a future
version of this document.
3.2. No Support for CRMF
This document uses PKCS #10 [RFC2986] for the "generate-certificate-
signing-request" action. The use of Certificate Request Message
Format (CRMF) [RFC4211] was considered, but is was unclear if there
was market demand for it. If it is desired to support CRMF in the
future, a backwards compatible solution can be defined at that time.
3.3. Access to Data Nodes
The YANG module in this document defines "grouping" statements that
are designed to be accessed via YANG based management protocols, such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] and RESTCONF [RFC8040]. Both of these protocols
have mandatory-to-implement secure transport layers (e.g., SSH, TLS)
with mutual authentication.
The NETCONF access control model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means
to restrict access for particular users to a pre-configured subset of
all available protocol operations and content.
Since the module in this document only define groupings, these
considerations are primarily for the designers of other modules that
use these groupings.
There are a number of data nodes defined by the grouping statements
that are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is
the default). Some of these data nodes may be considered sensitive
or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g.,
edit-config) to these data nodes without proper protection can have a
negative effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and
data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
*: All of the data nodes defined by all the groupings are
considered sensitive to write operations. For instance, the
modification of a public key or a certificate can dramatically
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
alter the implemented security policy. For this reason, the
NACM extension "default-deny-write" has been applied to all the
data nodes defined by all the groupings.
Some of the readable data nodes in the YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data
nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
/private-key: The "private-key" node defined in the "asymmetric-
key-pair-grouping" grouping is additionally sensitive to read
operations such that, in normal use cases, it should never be
returned to a client. For this reason, the NACM extension
"default-deny-all" has been applied to it here.
Some of the operations in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control access to these operations. These are the
operations and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
*: All of the "action" statements defined by groupings SHOULD only
be executed by authorized users. For this reason, the NACM
extension "default-deny-all" has been applied to all of them.
Note that NACM uses "default-deny-all" to protect "RPC" and
"action" statements; it does not define, e.g., an extension
called "default-deny-execute".
generate-certificate-signing-request: For this action, it is
RECOMMENDED that implementations assert channel binding
[RFC5056], so as to ensure that the application layer that sent
the request is the same as the device authenticated when the
secure transport layer was established.
4. IANA Considerations
4.1. The IETF XML Registry
This document registers one URI in the "ns" subregistry of the IETF
XML Registry [RFC3688]. Following the format in [RFC3688], the
following registration is requested:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-crypto-types
Registrant Contact: The NETCONF WG of the IETF.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
4.2. The YANG Module Names Registry
This document registers one YANG module in the YANG Module Names
registry [RFC6020]. Following the format in [RFC6020], the the
following registration is requested:
name: ietf-crypto-types
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-crypto-types
prefix: ct
reference: RFC XXXX
5. References
5.1. Normative References
[ITU.X690.2015]
International Telecommunication Union, "Information
Technology - ASN.1 encoding rules: Specification of Basic
Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and
Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)", ITU-T Recommendation
X.690, ISO/IEC 8825-1, August 2015,
<https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.690/>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC2404] Madson, C. and R. Glenn, "The Use of HMAC-SHA-1-96 within
ESP and AH", RFC 2404, DOI 10.17487/RFC2404, November
1998, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2404>.
[RFC3565] Schaad, J., "Use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax
(CMS)", RFC 3565, DOI 10.17487/RFC3565, July 2003,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3565>.
[RFC3686] Housley, R., "Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
Counter Mode With IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload
(ESP)", RFC 3686, DOI 10.17487/RFC3686, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3686>.
[RFC4106] Viega, J. and D. McGrew, "The Use of Galois/Counter Mode
(GCM) in IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)",
RFC 4106, DOI 10.17487/RFC4106, June 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4106>.
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
[RFC4253] Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Transport Layer Protocol", RFC 4253, DOI 10.17487/RFC4253,
January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4253>.
[RFC4279] Eronen, P., Ed. and H. Tschofenig, Ed., "Pre-Shared Key
Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)",
RFC 4279, DOI 10.17487/RFC4279, December 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4279>.
[RFC4309] Housley, R., "Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) CCM
Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)",
RFC 4309, DOI 10.17487/RFC4309, December 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4309>.
[RFC4494] Song, JH., Poovendran, R., and J. Lee, "The AES-CMAC-96
Algorithm and Its Use with IPsec", RFC 4494,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4494, June 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4494>.
[RFC4543] McGrew, D. and J. Viega, "The Use of Galois Message
Authentication Code (GMAC) in IPsec ESP and AH", RFC 4543,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4543, May 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4543>.
[RFC4868] Kelly, S. and S. Frankel, "Using HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-
384, and HMAC-SHA-512 with IPsec", RFC 4868,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4868, May 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4868>.
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
(CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>.
[RFC5652] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70,
RFC 5652, DOI 10.17487/RFC5652, September 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5652>.
[RFC5656] Stebila, D. and J. Green, "Elliptic Curve Algorithm
Integration in the Secure Shell Transport Layer",
RFC 5656, DOI 10.17487/RFC5656, December 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5656>.
[RFC6187] Igoe, K. and D. Stebila, "X.509v3 Certificates for Secure
Shell Authentication", RFC 6187, DOI 10.17487/RFC6187,
March 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6187>.
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7919] Gillmor, D., "Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman
Ephemeral Parameters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)",
RFC 7919, DOI 10.17487/RFC7919, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7919>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8268] Baushke, M., "More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-
Hellman (DH) Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell
(SSH)", RFC 8268, DOI 10.17487/RFC8268, December 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8268>.
[RFC8332] Bider, D., "Use of RSA Keys with SHA-256 and SHA-512 in
the Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol", RFC 8332,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8332, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8332>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8422] Nir, Y., Josefsson, S., and M. Pegourie-Gonnard, "Elliptic
Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer
Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier", RFC 8422,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8422, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8422>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
5.2. Informative References
[RFC2986] Nystrom, M. and B. Kaliski, "PKCS #10: Certification
Request Syntax Specification Version 1.7", RFC 2986,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2986, November 2000,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2986>.
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
[RFC3174] Eastlake 3rd, D. and P. Jones, "US Secure Hash Algorithm 1
(SHA1)", RFC 3174, DOI 10.17487/RFC3174, September 2001,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3174>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC4211] Schaad, J., "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF)", RFC 4211,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4211, September 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4211>.
[RFC4493] Song, JH., Poovendran, R., Lee, J., and T. Iwata, "The
AES-CMAC Algorithm", RFC 4493, DOI 10.17487/RFC4493, June
2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4493>.
[RFC5056] Williams, N., "On the Use of Channel Bindings to Secure
Channels", RFC 5056, DOI 10.17487/RFC5056, November 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5056>.
[RFC5915] Turner, S. and D. Brown, "Elliptic Curve Private Key
Structure", RFC 5915, DOI 10.17487/RFC5915, June 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5915>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6125] Saint-Andre, P. and J. Hodges, "Representation and
Verification of Domain-Based Application Service Identity
within Internet Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509
(PKIX) Certificates in the Context of Transport Layer
Security (TLS)", RFC 6125, DOI 10.17487/RFC6125, March
2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6125>.
[RFC6234] Eastlake 3rd, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
(SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6234, May 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6234>.
[RFC6239] Igoe, K., "Suite B Cryptographic Suites for Secure Shell
(SSH)", RFC 6239, DOI 10.17487/RFC6239, May 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6239>.
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6507] Groves, M., "Elliptic Curve-Based Certificateless
Signatures for Identity-Based Encryption (ECCSI)",
RFC 6507, DOI 10.17487/RFC6507, February 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6507>.
[RFC8017] Moriarty, K., Ed., Kaliski, B., Jonsson, J., and A. Rusch,
"PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2",
RFC 8017, DOI 10.17487/RFC8017, November 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8017>.
[RFC8032] Josefsson, S. and I. Liusvaara, "Edwards-Curve Digital
Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)", RFC 8032,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8032, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8032>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[RFC8439] Nir, Y. and A. Langley, "ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for IETF
Protocols", RFC 8439, DOI 10.17487/RFC8439, June 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8439>.
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
Appendix A. Examples
A.1. The "asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping" Grouping
The following example module has been constructed to illustrate use
of the "asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping" grouping defined in
the "ietf-crypto-types" module.
Note that the "asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping" grouping uses
both the "asymmetric-key-pair-grouping" and "end-entity-cert-
grouping" groupings, and that the "asymmetric-key-pair-grouping"
grouping uses the "public-key-grouping" grouping. Thus, a total of
four of the five groupings defined in the "ietf-crypto-types" module
are illustrated through the use of this one grouping. The only
grouping not represented is the "trust-anchor-cert-grouping"
grouping.
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
module ex-crypto-types-usage {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "http://example.com/ns/example-crypto-types-usage";
prefix "ectu";
import ietf-crypto-types {
prefix ct;
reference
"RFC XXXX: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
}
organization
"Example Corporation";
contact
"Author: YANG Designer <mailto:yang.designer@example.com>";
description
"This module illustrates the grouping
defined in the crypto-types draft called
'asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping'.";
revision "1001-01-01" {
description
"Initial version";
reference
"RFC ????: Usage Example for RFC XXXX";
}
container keys {
description
"A container of keys.";
list key {
key name;
leaf name {
type string;
description
"An arbitrary name for this key.";
}
uses ct:asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping;
description
"An asymmetric key pair with associated certificates.";
}
}
}
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
Given the above example usage module, the following example
illustrates some configured keys.
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
<keys xmlns="http://example.com/ns/example-crypto-types-usage">
<key>
<name>ex-key</name>
<algorithm
xmlns:ct="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-crypto-types">
ct:rsa2048
</algorithm>
<public-key>base64encodedvalue==</public-key>
<private-key>base64encodedvalue==</private-key>
<certificates>
<certificate>
<name>ex-cert</name>
<cert>base64encodedvalue==</cert>
</certificate>
</certificates>
</key>
<key>
<name>ex-hidden-key</name>
<algorithm
xmlns:ct="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-crypto-types">
ct:rsa2048
</algorithm>
<public-key>base64encodedvalue==</public-key>
<private-key>permanently-hidden</private-key>
<certificates>
<certificate>
<name>ex-hidden-key-cert</name>
<cert>base64encodedvalue==</cert>
</certificate>
</certificates>
</key>
<key>
<name>ex-encrypted-key</name>
<algorithm
xmlns:ct="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-crypto-types">
ct:rsa2048
</algorithm>
<public-key>base64encodedvalue==</public-key>
<private-key>encrypted-by:ex-key:base64encodedvalue==</private-key>
<certificates>
<certificate>
<name>ex-encrypted-key-cert</name>
<cert>base64encodedvalue==</cert>
</certificate>
</certificates>
</key>
</keys>
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
A.2. The "generate-certificate-signing-request" Action
The following example illustrates the "generate-certificate-signing-
request" action in use with the NETCONF protocol.
REQUEST
<rpc message-id="101"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
<action xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:1">
<keys xmlns="http://example.com/ns/example-crypto-types-usage">
<key>
<name>ex-key-sect571r1</name>
<generate-certificate-signing-request>
<subject>base64encodedvalue==</subject>
<attributes>base64encodedvalue==</attributes>
</generate-certificate-signing-request>
</key>
</keys>
</action>
</rpc>
RESPONSE
<rpc-reply message-id="101"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
<certificate-signing-request
xmlns="http://example.com/ns/example-crypto-types-usage">
base64encodedvalue==
</certificate-signing-request>
</rpc-reply>
A.3. The "certificate-expiration" Notification
The following example illustrates the "certificate-expiration"
notification in use with the NETCONF protocol.
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
<notification
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0">
<eventTime>2018-05-25T00:01:00Z</eventTime>
<keys xmlns="http://example.com/ns/example-crypto-types-usage">
<key>
<name>locally-defined key</name>
<certificates>
<certificate>
<name>my-cert</name>
<certificate-expiration>
<expiration-date>
2018-08-05T14:18:53-05:00
</expiration-date>
</certificate-expiration>
</certificate>
</certificates>
</key>
</keys>
</notification>
Appendix B. Change Log
B.1. I-D to 00
o Removed groupings and notifications.
o Added typedefs for identityrefs.
o Added typedefs for other RFC 5280 structures.
o Added typedefs for other RFC 5652 structures.
o Added convenience typedefs for RFC 4253, RFC 5280, and RFC 5652.
B.2. 00 to 01
o Moved groupings from the draft-ietf-netconf-keystore here.
B.3. 01 to 02
o Removed unwanted "mandatory" and "must" statements.
o Added many new crypto algorithms (thanks Haiguang!)
o Clarified in asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping, in
certificates/certificate/name/description, that if the name MUST
NOT match the name of a certificate that exists independently in
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
<operational>, enabling certs installed by the manufacturer (e.g.,
an IDevID).
B.4. 02 to 03
o renamed base identity 'asymmetric-key-encryption-algorithm' to
'asymmetric-key-algorithm'.
o added new 'asymmetric-key-algorithm' identities for secp192r1,
secp224r1, secp256r1, secp384r1, and secp521r1.
o removed 'mac-algorithm' identities for mac-aes-128-ccm, mac-aes-
192-ccm, mac-aes-256-ccm, mac-aes-128-gcm, mac-aes-192-gcm, mac-
aes-256-gcm, and mac-chacha20-poly1305.
o for all -cbc and -ctr identities, renamed base identity
'symmetric-key-encryption-algorithm' to 'encryption-algorithm'.
o for all -ccm and -gcm identities, renamed base identity
'symmetric-key-encryption-algorithm' to 'encryption-and-mac-
algorithm' and renamed the identity to remove the "enc-" prefix.
o for all the 'signature-algorithm' based identities, renamed from
'rsa-*' to 'rsassa-*'.
o removed all of the "x509v3-" prefixed 'signature-algorithm' based
identities.
o added 'key-exchange-algorithm' based identities for 'rsaes-oaep'
and 'rsaes-pkcs1-v1_5'.
o renamed typedef 'symmetric-key-encryption-algorithm-ref' to
'symmetric-key-algorithm-ref'.
o renamed typedef 'asymmetric-key-encryption-algorithm-ref' to
'asymmetric-key-algorithm-ref'.
o added typedef 'encryption-and-mac-algorithm-ref'.
o Updated copyright date, boilerplate template, affiliation, and
folding algorithm.
B.5. 03 to 04
o ran YANG module through formatter.
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
B.6. 04 to 05
o fixed broken symlink causing reformatted YANG module to not show.
B.7. 05 to 06
o Added NACM annotations.
o Updated Security Considerations section.
o Added 'asymmetric-key-pair-with-cert-grouping' grouping.
o Removed text from 'permanently-hidden' enum regarding such keys
not being backed up or restored.
o Updated the boilerplate text in module-level "description"
statement to match copyeditor convention.
o Added an explanation to the 'public-key-grouping' and 'asymmetric-
key-pair-grouping' statements as for why the nodes are not
mandatory (e.g., because they may exist only in <operational>.
o Added 'must' expressions to the 'public-key-grouping' and
'asymmetric-key-pair-grouping' statements ensuring sibling nodes
are either all exist or do not all exist.
o Added an explanation to the 'permanently-hidden' that the value
cannot be configured directly by clients and servers MUST fail any
attempt to do so.
o Added 'trust-anchor-certs-grouping' and 'end-entity-certs-
grouping' (the plural form of existing groupings).
o Now states that keys created in <operational> by the *-hidden-key
actions are bound to the lifetime of the parent 'config true'
node, and that subsequent invocations of either action results in
a failure.
B.8. 06 to 07
o Added clarifications that implementations SHOULD assert that
configured certificates contain the matching public key.
o Replaced the 'generate-hidden-key' and 'install-hidden-key'
actions with special 'crypt-hash' -like input/output values.
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography June 2019
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank for following for lively discussions
on list and in the halls (ordered by last name): Martin Bjorklund,
Nick Hancock, Balazs Kovacs, Juergen Schoenwaelder, Eric Voit, and
Liang Xia.
Authors' Addresses
Kent Watsen
Watsen Networks
EMail: kent+ietf@watsen.net
Wang Haiguang
Huawei
EMail: wang.haiguang.shieldlab@huawei.com
Watsen & Wang Expires December 9, 2019 [Page 57]