An ACME Profile for Generating Delegated STAR Certificates
draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-01

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (acme WG)
Last updated 2019-08-26
Replaces draft-sheffer-acme-star-delegation
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats plain text xml pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream WG state WG Document
Document shepherd No shepherd assigned
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
ACME                                                          Y. Sheffer
Internet-Draft                                                    Intuit
Intended status: Standards Track                                D. Lopez
Expires: February 27, 2020                             A. Pastor Perales
                                                          Telefonica I+D
                                                              T. Fossati
                                                                   Nokia
                                                         August 26, 2019

       An ACME Profile for Generating Delegated STAR Certificates
                   draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-01

Abstract

   This memo proposes a profile of the ACME protocol that allows the
   owner of an identifier (e.g., a domain name) to delegate to a third
   party access to a certificate associated with said identifier.  A
   primary use case is that of a CDN (the third party) terminating TLS
   sessions on behalf of a content provider (the owner of a domain
   name).  The presented mechanism allows the owner of the identifier to
   retain control over the delegation and revoke it at any time by
   cancelling the associated STAR certificate renewal with the ACME CA.
   Another key property of this mechanism is it does not require any
   modification to the deployed TLS ecosystem.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on February 27, 2020.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

Sheffer, et al.         Expires February 27, 2020               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft            ACME STAR Delegation               August 2019

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.1.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.2.  Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   2.  Protocol Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.1.  Preconditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.2.  Overview  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     2.3.  Delegated Identity Profile  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
       2.3.1.  Order Object on the NDC-IdO side  . . . . . . . . . .   6
       2.3.2.  Order Object on the IdO-CA side . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       2.3.3.  Capability Discovery  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       2.3.4.  On Cancelation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   3.  CSR Template  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     3.1.  Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     3.2.  Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   4.  Further Use Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     4.1.  CDNI  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
       4.1.1.  Multiple Parallel Delegates . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
       4.1.2.  Chained Delegation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     4.2.  STIR  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     5.1.  New fields in the "meta" Object within a Directory Object  13
     5.2.  CSR Template Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     6.1.  Restricting CDNs to the Delegation Mechanism  . . . . . .  13
     6.2.  TBC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
   7.  Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
   8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
     8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
Show full document text