IESG agenda: 2020-11-05
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll call
1.2 Bash the agenda
1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats
1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat
OUTSTANDING TASKS
Last updated: October 23, 2020
o Warren Kumari to work on acknowledging shepherds, directorate
reviewers in a more standardized/formal way.
- Added 2019-10-10 (24 telechats ago)
o Eric Vyncke to write up draft text on Special Interest
Groups and send to the IESG for comment.
- Added 2019-11-17 (22 telechats ago)
o Alvaro Retana, Benjamin Kaduk, and Murray Kucherawy to look at
updating the I-D Checklist.
- Added 2019-10-31; reassigned 2020-03-05 (17 telechats ago)
o Alvaro Retana and Martin Vigoureux to draft text on guidance
regarding the number of document authors on documents.
- Added 2020-06-02 (10 telechats ago)
o Alvaro Retana, Rob Wilton, Alissa Cooper, and Martin Vigoureux to
draft text on the framework for a long-term future plan for the
IETF.
- Added 2020-06-02 (10 telechats ago)
o Roman Danyliw to draft text for a request to the Tools Team to move
BoF requests from the BoF Wiki to the Datatracker.
- Added 2020-06-04 (10 telechats ago)
o Alvaro Retana, Warren Kumari, and Barry Leiba to draft clarifying
text on Errata Best Practices.
- Added 2020-06-04 (10 telechats ago)
o Eric Vyncke to follow up on the suggestion at IETF 108 to share a
list of grammar checking tools with the community.
- Added 2020-07-29 (6 telechats ago)
o Roman Danyliw and Murray Kucherawy to find designated experts for
RFC 8894 [IANA #1177950].
- Added 2020-09-24 (3 telechats ago)
o Murray Kucherawy to find designated experts for RFC 8876 [IANA
#1178766].
- Added 2020-09-25 (2 telechats ago)
o Martin Vigoureux and Alvaro Retana to work with Jay Daley on the
process for using EthicsPoint incident management software as
the mechanism of private feedback and anonymous reporting.
- Added 2020-10-01 (2 telechats ago)
o Barry Leiba to draft a policy about when to create and announce
mailing lists for new potential Working Groups in order to
facilitate discussion of the Proposed WG charters.
- Added 2020-10-01 (2 telechats ago)
o Erik Kline to find designated Experts for RFC 8915 [IANA #1179647].
- Added 2020-10-05 (2 telechats ago)
o Barry Leiba to write up a request for change in the Datatracker
behavior to automatically move a document to the state
IESG Evaluation when the document ballot is issued.
- Added 2020-10-15 (1 telechats ago)
o Alvaro Retana to find designated experts for RFC 8919 [IANA
#1181014].
- Added 2020-10-23 (0 telechats ago)
2. Protocol actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG submissions
2.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-babel-source-specific
- Proposed Standard
- Source-Specific Routing in Babel
- Token
- Martin Vigoureux (RTG area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection
- Proposed Standard
- Software-Defined Networking (SDN)-based IPsec Flow Protection
- Token
- Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery
- Proposed Standard
- Distributed-Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Agent Discovery
- Token
- Benjamin Kaduk (SEC area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header
- Proposed Standard
- Service Function Chaining: Subscriber and Performance Policy Identification Variable-Length Network Service Header (NSH) Context Headers
- Token
- Martin Vigoureux (RTG area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6
- Proposed Standard
- Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules for IPv6
- Token
- Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan
- Proposed Standard
- Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) over LoRaWAN
- Note
- AD has checked with authors whether the Lora Alliance has reviewed this document: yes, review done.
- Token
- Éric Vyncke (INT area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IPR
-
Acklio's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan
2.1.2 Returning items
(None)
2.2 Individual submissions
2.2.1 New items
(None)
2.2.2 Returning items
(None)
2.3 Status changes
2.3.1 New items
(None)
2.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3. Document actions
3.1 WG submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-babel-information-model
- Informational
- Babel Information Model
- Token
- Martin Vigoureux (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Unknown
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-acme-email-smime
- Informational
- Extensions to Automatic Certificate Management Environment for end-user S/MIME certificates
- Token
- Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-suit-architecture
- Informational
- A Firmware Update Architecture for Internet of Things
- Token
- Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert
- Informational
- Handling Large Certificates and Long Certificate Chains in TLS-based EAP Methods
- Token
- Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
3.1.2 Returning items
(None)
3.2 Individual submissions via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New items
(None)
3.2.2 Returning items
(None)
3.3 Status changes
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"
3.3.1 New items
(None)
3.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents
The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:
- The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
- The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
- The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
- The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
- The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.4.1 New items
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-huitema-rfc-eval-project
IETF conflict review for draft-huitema-rfc-eval-project - ISE Informational
-
draft-huitema-rfc-eval-project
Evaluation of a Sample of RFC Produced in 2018 - Token
- Alissa Cooper
3.4.2 Returning items
(None)
4. Working Group actions
4.1 WG creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review
- WG name
- Open Specification for Pretty Good Privacy (openpgp)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-openpgp-(02-01)
- Area
- SEC (Benjamin Kaduk)
4.1.2 Proposed for approval
- WG name
- Secure Media Frames (sframe)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-sframe-(00-02)
- Area
- ART (Murray Kucherawy)
4.2 WG rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review
(None)
4.2.2 Proposed for approval
(None)