IESG agenda: 2016-09-01

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: August 18, 2016

  o Benoit Claise, Alvaro Retana, and Suresh Krishnan to propose charter 
    development recommendations.
    - Added 2016-06-16 (5 telechats ago)

  o Jari Arkko and the IESG to put together feedback questions regarding 
    the 10am meeting start, length of the meeting time, and potential 
    experiments with meeting formats (unconference, lounges, 1+lounge 
    time, etc.)
    - Added after IETF 96 (2 telechats ago)

  o Suresh Krishnan to find more scribes.
    - Added after IETF 96 (2 telechats ago)

  o Ben Campbell to find a designated expert for SDP Parameters [IANA 
    #922491].
    - Added 2016-08-18 (1 telechat ago)

  o Jari Arkko to produce new text to go on the IPR web page.
    - Added 2016-08-18 (1 telechat ago)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs
Proposed Standard
Multiple NFSv4 Domain Namespace Deployment Guidelines
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout
Proposed Standard
Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping
Proposed Standard
Label Switched Path (LSP) and Pseudowire (PW) Ping/Trace over MPLS Network using Entropy Labels (EL)
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
IPR
Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping
Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds
Proposed Standard
Managing DS records from parent via CDS/CDNSKEY
Token
Joel Jaeggli (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes
Proposed Standard
Multiplexing Scheme Updates for Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Extension for Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
Token
Ben Campbell (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
IPR

IETF stream
draft-ietf-avtext-rid
Proposed Standard
RTP Stream Identifier Source Description (SDES)
Token
Ben Campbell (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tram-turn-mobility
Proposed Standard
Mobility with TURN
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery
Proposed Standard
TURN Server Auto Discovery
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation
Informational
Generation of IPv6 Atomic Fragments Considered Harmful
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness
Informational
ICE Multihomed and IPv4/IPv6 Dual Stack Fairness
Token
Ben Campbell (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete
Informational
Republishing the IPV6-specific MIB modules as obsolete
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown

IETF stream
draft-ietf-httpauth-extension
Experimental
HTTP Authentication Extensions for Interactive Clients
Token
Kathleen Moriarty (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Unknown

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9
Informational
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Registrations for PKCS #9
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-hardy-pdf-mime
Informational
The application/pdf Media Type
Token
Alexey Melnikov (NONE area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

(None)

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4.3 For action

Conflict review
conflict-review-thomas-namecollisions-workshop-report
IETF conflict review for draft-thomas-namecollisions-workshop-report
ISE Informational
draft-thomas-namecollisions-workshop-report
Report from the Workshop and Prize on Root Causes and Mitigation of Name Collisions
Token
Joel Jaeggli

Conflict review
conflict-review-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview
IETF conflict review for draft-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview
ISE Informational
draft-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview
Source Address Dependent Routing and Source Address Selection for IPv6 Hosts: Problem Space Overview
Token
Suresh Krishnan

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

WG name
QUIC (quic)
Charter
charter-ietf-quic-(00-01)
Area
TSV (Spencer Dawkins)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

WG name
IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme)
Charter
charter-ietf-ipsecme-(10-00)
Area
SEC (Kathleen Moriarty)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

7. Working Group news