IESG agenda: 2018-05-24

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: May 10, 2018

  o Benjamin Kaduk to ask the designated experts for the AEAD Parameters 
    registry to update the registry noting that draft-nir-cfrg-
    rfc7539bis will obsolete RFC 7539.
    - Added 2018-04-19 (2 telechats ago) 
  o Alexey Melnikov to find a designated expert for RFC 8323 [IANA 
    #1108770] 
    - Added 2018-05-02 (1 telechat ago)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification
Proposed Standard
Notification Message support for BGP Graceful Restart
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-softwire-map-mib
Proposed Standard
Definitions of Managed Objects for MAP-E
Token
Terry Manderson (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis
Proposed Standard
Diameter Credit-Control Application
Token
Ben Campbell (OPS area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang
Proposed Standard
A YANG Data Module for Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite)
Token
Terry Manderson (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane
Proposed Standard
An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)
Token
Terry Manderson (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics
Informational
Considerations for Selecting RTCP Extended Report (XR) Metrics for the WebRTC Statistics API
Token
Ben Campbell (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework
Informational
A framework for Management and Control of microwave and millimeter wave interface parameters
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework
Informational
Framework for Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-kucherawy-dispatch-zstd
Informational
Zstandard Compression and The application/zstd Media Type
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-housley-suite-b-to-historic
Informational
Reclassification of Suite B Documents to Historic Status
Token
Eric Rescorla (NONE area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

IETF stream
status-change-suiteb-to-historic
None
Reclassification of Suite B Documents to Historic Status
Token
Eric Rescorla (IETF area)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

(None)

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4.3 For action

Conflict review
conflict-review-song-yeti-testbed-experience
IETF conflict review for draft-song-yeti-testbed-experience
ISE Experimental
draft-song-yeti-testbed-experience
Yeti DNS Testbed
Token
Alissa Cooper

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

WG name
Messaging Layer Security (mls)
Charter
charter-ietf-mls-(00-02)
Area
SEC (Benjamin Kaduk)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

WG name
DNS PRIVate Exchange (dprive)
Charter
charter-ietf-dprive-(01-00)
Area
INT (Terry Manderson)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)