IESG agenda: 2016-09-29

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: September 29, 2016

  o Benoit Claise, Alvaro Retana, and Suresh Krishnan to propose charter 
    development recommendations.
    - Added 2016-06-16 (8 telechats ago)

  o Suresh Krishnan to find more scribes.
    - Added after IETF 96 (5 telechats ago)

  o Spencer Dawkins to organize a discussion about different meeting 
    formats for the Working Group Chairs Forum in Seoul.
    - Added 2016-09-29 (1 telechat ago)

  o Alissa Cooper to find designated experts for RFC-ietf-clue-data-
    model-schema-17 (CLUE) [IANA #927901].
    - Added 2016-09-29 (1 telechat ago)

  o Ben Campbell and Alexey Melnikov to find designated experts for RFC 
    6690 (CoRE Parameters) [IANA #928192], as well as a backup for Zach 
    Shelby for the other CoRE registries.
    - Added 2016-09-29 (1 telechat ago)

  o Suresh Krishnan to find a designated expert for RFC 4944 [IANA 
    #929707].
    - Added 2016-09-29 (1 telechat ago)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pals-rfc4447bis
Internet Standard
Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance using the Label Distribution Protocol
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-softwire-unified-cpe
Proposed Standard
Unified IPv4-in-IPv6 Softwire CPE: A DHCPv6-based Prioritization Mechanism
Token
Terry Manderson (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap
Proposed Standard
GRE-in-UDP Encapsulation
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch
Proposed Standard
6LoWPAN Paging Dispatch
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-cose-msg
Proposed Standard
CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)
Token
Kathleen Moriarty (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ipsecme-ddos-protection
Proposed Standard
Protecting Internet Key Exchange Protocol version 2 (IKEv2) Implementations from Distributed Denial of Service Attacks
Token
Kathleen Moriarty (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements
Informational
I2RS Security Related Requirements
Token
Alia Atlas (RTG area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization
Experimental
Multi-Path Time Synchronization
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

(None)

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

(None)

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

WG name
SIDR Operations (sidrops)
Charter
charter-ietf-sidrops-(00-03)
Area
OPS (Joel Jaeggli)

WG name
IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (ipwave)
Charter
charter-ietf-ipwave-(00-02)
Area
INT (Suresh Krishnan)

WG name
IPv6 over Low Power Wide-Area Networks (lpwan)
Charter
charter-ietf-lpwan-(00-00)
Area
INT (Suresh Krishnan)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

WG name
QUIC (quic)
Charter
charter-ietf-quic-(00-09)
Area
TSV (Spencer Dawkins)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

7. Working Group news