IESG agenda: 2020-01-23

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: January 9, 2020

  o Roman Danyliw to draft text to be posted on ietf.org about reporting 
    protocol vulnerabilities via an email alias and possible procedures 
    on how to assign triage resources. 
    - Added 2019-04-24 (15 telechats ago)
  o Alexey Melnikov to think about how to analyze how successful WGs and 
    protocols are and why they failed or not.
    - Added 2019-10-09 (4 telechats ago)
  o Martin Vigoureux with Wes, and Alvaro to work on some
    mechanism to obtain wider or private feedback from people who are 
    disenfranchised; anonymous flagging of offensive emails to inform 
    leadership; more opportunities for private feedback.
    - Added 2019-10-10 (4 telechats ago)
  o Alvaro Retana with Warren, Alexey, Martin, Barry, and Roman 
    to work on more transparency in the Datatracker about how long each 
    phase of doc process takes / New datatracker flag to indicate who 
    has the ball, area directors, authors, or chairs.
    - Added 2019-10-10 (4 telechats ago)
  o Alexey Melnikov and Warren Kumari to add keyword tags to WG charters 
    to identify specs that pertain to some general concept.
    - Added 2019-10-10 (4 telechats ago)
  o Alvaro Retana to work on a framework for analyzing new proposals. 
    - Added 2019-10-10 (4 telechats ago)
  o Adam Roach to work on a virtual social room for remote attendees 
    (promoting #hallway)
    - Added 2019-10-10 (4 telechats ago)
  o Warren Kumari to work on acknowledging shepherds, directorate 
    reviewers in a more standardized/formal way.
    - Added 2019-10-10 (4 telechats ago)
  o Alexey Melnikov to organize IoT overview discussion with interested 
    ADs.
    - Added 2019-10-10 (4 telechats ago)
  o Ignas Bagdonas to write a draft of an IoT Systems charter.
    - Added 2019-10-10 (4 telechats ago)
  o Alvaro Retana and Adam Roach to look at updating the I-D Checklist.
    - Added 2019-10-31 (3 telechats ago)
  o Roman Danilyw to find designated experts for RFC-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-
    with-psk [IANA #1156116].
    - Added 2019-11-13 (2 telechats ago)
  o Roman Danilyw to find designated experts for RFC 8471 [IANA 
    #1156118].
    - Added 2019-11-13 (2 telechats ago)
  o Eric Vyncke to write up draft text on Special Interest 
    Groups and send to the IESG for comment.
    - Added 2019-11-17 (2 telechats ago)
  o All IESG to submit their metrics data priorities to Roman (deadline 
    January 16, 2020).
    - Added 2019-11-18 (2 telechats ago)
  o Roman Danyliw to collect feedback from the IESG on the metrics 
    data priorities for the IESG to discuss at a future meeting.
    - Added 2019-11-18 (2 telechats ago)
  o Ben Kaduk, Alvaro Retana, and Suresh Krishnan to skim the ietf@ietf 
    list and collect a list of topics that seem to be the major concerns 
    for the community from recent discussion threads.
    - Added 2019-11-18 (2 telechats ago)
  o Martin Vigoureux to put together a proposal on disambiguating side 
    meetings from IETF meetings. 
    - Added 2019-11-22 (2 telechats ago)
  o Magnus Westerlund to draft an IESG Statement regarding the IETF 
    as the default change controller for IANA Registration requests.
    - Added 2019-12-12 (1 telechats ago)
  o Suresh Krishnan to draft a "best errata practices" document and 
    post it on the IESG Wiki.
    - Added 2019-12-12 (1 telechats ago)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains
Proposed Standard
Discovering Provisioning Domain Names and Data
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-regext-login-security
Proposed Standard
Login Security Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Token
Barry Leiba (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags
Proposed Standard
Updated Rules for Processing Stateful PCE Request Parameters Flags
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis
Best Current Practice
URI Design and Ownership
Token
Adam Roach (NONE area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

(None)

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

(None)

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

Conflict review
conflict-review-carpenter-limited-domains
IETF conflict review for draft-carpenter-limited-domains
ISE Informational
draft-carpenter-limited-domains
Limited Domains and Internet Protocols
Token
Suresh Krishnan

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4.3 For action

Conflict review
conflict-review-google-self-published-geofeeds
IETF conflict review for draft-google-self-published-geofeeds
ISE Informational
draft-google-self-published-geofeeds
A Format for Self-published IP Geolocation Feeds
Token
Alissa Cooper

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

WG name
Reliable and Available Wireless (raw)
Charter
charter-ietf-raw-(00-00)
Area
RTG ((None))

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 [IANA #1156116] Designated experts for RFC-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-with-psk (RFC 8696) (Roman Danyliw)

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)