IESG agenda: 2018-09-27
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll call
1.2 Bash the agenda
1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats
1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat
OUTSTANDING TASKS
Last updated: September 13, 2018
o Suresh Krishnan to find designated experts for RFC-ietf-6tisch-6top-
protocol [IANA #1119883].
- Added 2018-08-23 (2 telechats ago)
o Eric Rescorla to find designated experts for RFC 8411 [IANA
#1120853].
- Added 2018-08-29 (2 telechats ago)
o Eric Rescorla to find designated experts for RFC 6509
(mikey-payloads) [IANA #1121057].
- Added 2018-08-30 (1 telechats ago)
o Eric Rescorla to find designated experts for RFC 6043
(mikey-payloads) [IANA #1121239].
- Added 2018-08-31 (1 telechats ago)
o Eric Rescorla to find designated experts for RFC 6267
(mikey-payloads) [IANA #1121240].
- Added 2018-08-31 (1 telechats ago)
o Eric Rescorla to find designated experts for RFC 6309
(mikey-payloads) [IANA #1121241].
- Added 2018-08-31 (1 telechats ago)
2. Protocol actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG submissions
2.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang
- Proposed Standard
- A YANG Module for Network Address Translation (NAT) and Network Prefix Translation (NPT)
- Token
- Ignas Bagdonas (OPS area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud
- Proposed Standard
- Path MTU Discovery Using Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
- Token
- Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf
- Proposed Standard
- RESTCONF Extensions to Support the Network Management Datastore Architecture
- Token
- Ignas Bagdonas (OPS area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model
- Proposed Standard
- Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model
- Token
- Ignas Bagdonas (OPS area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf
- Proposed Standard
- NETCONF Extensions to Support the Network Management Datastore Architecture
- Token
- Ignas Bagdonas (OPS area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Not OK
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd
- Proposed Standard
- Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using OSPF
- Token
- Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Not OK
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IPR
-
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd
- Proposed Standard
- Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS
- Token
- Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IPR
-
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast
- Proposed Standard
- IPv4 Multicast over an IPv6 Multicast in Softwire Mesh Network
- Token
- Terry Manderson (INT area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel
- Proposed Standard
- A Root Key Trust Anchor Sentinel for DNSSEC
- Token
- Terry Manderson (OPS area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-lisp-gpe
- Proposed Standard
- LISP Generic Protocol Extension
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis
- Proposed Standard
- The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- Deferred by
- Eric Rescorla on 2018-09-11
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis
- Proposed Standard
- Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Control-Plane
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- Deferred by
- Eric Rescorla on 2018-09-11
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-extra-imap-savedate
- Proposed Standard
- Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - SAVEDATE Extension
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.1.2 Returning items
(None)
2.2 Individual submissions
2.2.1 New items
(None)
2.2.2 Returning items
(None)
2.3 Status changes
2.3.1 New items
(None)
2.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3. Document actions
3.1 WG submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns
- Informational
- Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service Providers
- Token
- Warren Kumari (OPS area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
3.1.2 Returning items
(None)
3.2 Individual submissions via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-mahesh-etsi-urn
- Informational
- URN Namespace for ETSI Documents
- Note
- This is to add ETSI namespace identifier, specifically targeting YANG model development by ETSI.
- Token
- Ignas Bagdonas (NONE area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Not OK
- Consensus
- Unknown
- Reviews
3.2.2 Returning items
(None)
3.3 Status changes
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"
3.3.1 New items
(None)
3.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents
The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:
- The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
- The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
- The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
- The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
- The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.4.1 New items
(None)
3.4.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4.3 For action
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-mst-lgapi
IETF conflict review for draft-mst-lgapi - ISE Informational
-
draft-mst-lgapi
Looking Glass command set - Token
- Alissa Cooper
4. Working Group actions
4.1 WG creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review
(None)
4.1.2 Proposed for approval
(None)
4.2 WG rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review
(None)
4.2.2 Proposed for approval
- WG name
- Source Packet Routing in Networking (spring)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-spring-(01-02)
- Area
- RTG (Martin Vigoureux)