IESG agenda: 2017-04-13

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: March 17, 2017

  o Benoit Claise and Joel Jaeggli to find a designated expert for RFC 
    7854 [IANA #953567].
    - Added 2017-03-16 (1 telechat ago)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option
Proposed Standard
IPv6 Performance and Diagnostic Metrics (PDM) Destination Option
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Inside Products, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction
Proposed Standard
MPLS LSP PW status refresh reduction for Static Pseudowires
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
Last call expires
2017-03-31
IPR
Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction

IETF stream
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws
Proposed Standard
VPWS support in EVPN
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Juniper Networks, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params
Proposed Standard
LMA Controlled MAG Session Parameters
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis
Internet Standard
Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security
Proposed Standard
Security of Messages Exchanged Between Servers and Relay Agents
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format
Proposed Standard
Support of IEEE-1588 time stamp format in Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement about IPR related to draft-mirsky-ippm-time-format and draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement about IPR related to draft-mirsky-ippm-time-format and draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format

IETF stream
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain
Proposed Standard
Routing Key Chain YANG Data Model
Token
Alia Atlas (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
Last call expires
2017-04-07

IETF stream
draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview
Proposed Standard
Overview: Real Time Protocols for Browser-based Applications
Token
Alissa Cooper (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost
Proposed Standard
Multi-Cost ALTO
Token
Mirja K├╝hlewind (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews
Last call expires
2017-03-27
IPR
Alcatel-Lucent's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost

IETF stream
draft-ietf-isis-mi-bis
Proposed Standard
IS-IS Multi-Instance
Token
Alia Atlas (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
Last call expires
2017-04-07

IETF stream
draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf
Proposed Standard
ISIS Auto-Configuration
Token
Alia Atlas (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
Last call expires
2017-04-10

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.1.3 For action

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps
Proposed Standard
TCP Encapsulation of IKE and IPsec Packets
Token
Kathleen Moriarty (SEC area)
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3.3 For action

IETF stream
status-change-icmpv6-dns-ipv6-to-internet-standard
None
Reclassifying ICMPv6 (RFC4443) and DNS Extensions for IPv6 (RFC3596) to Internet Standard
Token
Suresh Krishnan (IETF area)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-aqm-codel
Experimental
Controlled Delay Active Queue Management
Token
Mirja K├╝hlewind (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews
Last call expires
2017-03-27

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

(None)

3.2.2 Returning items

IETF stream
draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt
Informational
Effect of Pervasive Encryption
Token
Stephen Farrell (SEC area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

(None)

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 IESG Liaisons (IESG Secretary)

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)