IESG agenda: 2019-02-21

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: February 21, 2019

  o Alvaro Retana to send email to the IESG with proposed re-labeling of 
    scheduling conflicts.
    - Added 2018-12-06 (5 telechats ago)
  o Suresh Krishnan to discuss naming experts for the registries created 
    by draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnxsemantics with Allison Mankin.
    - Added 2019-01-10 (4 telechats ago)
  o Ben Campbell to write up text on the IESG's expectations regarding 
    conflicts of interest and the disclosure of funding sources.
    - Added 2019-01-17 (3 telechats ago)
  o Warren Kumari and Spencer Dawkins to develop the spherical routing 
    topic. 
    - Added 2019-01-17 (3 telechats ago)
  o Suresh Krishnan to draft a new proposed IESG Statement on the 
    procedure to reference material behind a paywall, that includes the 
    existing text and adds comments from the discussion, Eric Rescorla, 
    and Barry Leiba.
    - Added 2019-01-31 (2 telechats ago)
  o Roman Danyliw and Barry Leiba to identify and catalogue common 
    problematic and inappropriate behaviors from individuals in the IETF 
    community both at in-person meetings and on email lists.
    - Added 2019-02-14 (1 telechats ago)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec
Proposed Standard
WebRTC Forward Error Correction Requirements
Token
Adam Roach (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet
Proposed Standard
Encrypted Key Transport for DTLS and Secure RTP
Token
Ben Campbell (ART area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet

IETF stream
draft-ietf-detnet-architecture
Proposed Standard
Deterministic Networking Architecture
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb (Has RFC Editor Note)
Proposed Standard
A Lower Effort Per-Hop Behavior (LE PHB)
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-jmap-core
Proposed Standard
JSON Meta Application Protocol
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-jmap-mail
Proposed Standard
JMAP for Mail
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme
Proposed Standard
RTP Payload Format for Flexible Forward Error Correction (FEC)
Token
Ben Campbell (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis
Proposed Standard
Well-Known Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility
Informational
On Demand Mobility Management
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dots-requirements
Informational
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Open Threat Signaling Requirements
Token
Benjamin Kaduk (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews
IPR
Arbor Networks, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-dots-requirements

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

(None)

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

Conflict review
conflict-review-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile
IETF conflict review for draft-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile
ISE Informational
draft-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile
Commercial National Security Algorithm (CNSA) Suite Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile
Token
Benjamin Kaduk

Conflict review
conflict-review-vandesompel-citeas
IETF conflict review for draft-vandesompel-citeas
ISE Informational
draft-vandesompel-citeas
cite-as: A Link Relation to Convey a Preferred URI for Referencing
Token
Alexey Melnikov

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 Response to Liaison Statement on “Request to update the IoT and SC&C Standards Roadmap and the list of contact points" (Suresh Krishnan)

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)