IESG agenda: 2017-03-02

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: February 17, 2017

  o Alexey Melnikov to find a backup expert for Zach Shelby for the 
    other CoRE registries [IANA #928192].
    - Added 2016-10-13 (8 telechats ago)

  o Alexey Melnikov to find a designated expert for RFC 8053 [IANA 
    #947409].
    - Added 2017-02-02 (2 telechats ago)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination
Proposed Standard
Dual-Homing Coordination for MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Pseudowires Protection
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination

IETF stream
draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol
Proposed Standard
RPKI Repository Delta Protocol
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
Deferred by
Alexey Melnikov on 2017-02-16
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum
Proposed Standard
Home Network Prefix Renumbering in PMIPv6
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time
Proposed Standard
Residence Time Measurement in MPLS network
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-bidirection
Proposed Standard
Bi-directional Remote Procedure Call On RPC-over-RDMA Transports
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis
Proposed Standard
Remote Direct Memory Access Transport for Remote Procedure Call, Version One
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis
Internet Standard
Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews
Last call expires
2017-03-01

IETF stream
draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis
Internet Standard
IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
Last call expires
2017-03-01

IETF stream
draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis
Internet Standard
Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
Last call expires
2017-03-01

IETF stream
draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis
Proposed Standard
Indicating Character Encoding and Language for HTTP Header Field Parameters
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-bradner-rfc3979bis
Best Current Practice
Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology
Token
Jari Arkko (GEN area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-kivinen-802-15-ie
Proposed Standard
IEEE 802.15.4 Information Element for IETF
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
Last call expires
2017-02-24

IETF stream
draft-sgtatham-secsh-iutf8
Proposed Standard
IUTF8 Terminal Mode in Secure Shell (SSH)
Token
Kathleen Moriarty (NONE area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
Last call expires
2017-02-27

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3.3 For action

IETF stream
status-change-icmpv6-dns-ipv6-to-internet-standard
None
Reclassifying ICMPv6 (RFC4443) and DNS Extensions for IPv6 (RFC3596) to Internet Standard
Token
Suresh Krishnan (IETF area)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection
Informational
Dual-Homing Protection for MPLS and MPLS-TP Pseudowires
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews
IPR
Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

(None)

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

Conflict review
conflict-review-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding
IETF conflict review for draft-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding
ISE Informational
draft-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding
Huawei's GRE Tunnel Bonding Protocol
Token
Suresh Krishnan
IPR
Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd 's Statement about IPR related to draft-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding
Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd 's Statement about IPR related to draft-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)