IESG agenda: 2018-11-21
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll call
1.2 Bash the agenda
1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats
1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat
OUTSTANDING TASKS
Last updated: October 25, 2018
o Eric Rescorla to find designated experts for RFC 8411 [IANA
#1120853].
- Added 2018-08-29 (5 telechats ago)
o Eric Rescorla to find designated experts for RFC 6509
(mikey-payloads) [IANA #1121057].
- Added 2018-08-30 (4 telechats ago)
o Eric Rescorla to find designated experts for RFC 6043
(mikey-payloads) [IANA #1121239].
- Added 2018-08-31 (4 telechats ago)
o Eric Rescorla to find designated experts for RFC 6267
(mikey-payloads) [IANA #1121240].
- Added 2018-08-31 (4 telechats ago)
o Eric Rescorla to find designated experts for RFC 6309
(mikey-payloads) [IANA #1121241].
- Added 2018-08-31 (4 telechats ago)
2. Protocol actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG submissions
2.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-clue-protocol
- Proposed Standard
- Protocol for Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE)
- Token
- Adam Roach (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Not OK
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-clue-signaling
- Proposed Standard
- Session Signaling for Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE)
- Token
- Adam Roach (ART area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IPR
-
Polycom, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-clue-signaling
Polycom, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-clue-signaling
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange
- Proposed Standard
- OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange
- Token
- Eric Rescorla (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Not OK
- Consensus
- Unknown
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns
- Proposed Standard
- Split DNS Configuration for IKEv2
- Token
- Eric Rescorla (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-ntp-mac
- Proposed Standard
- Message Authentication Code for the Network Time Protocol
- Token
- Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric
- Proposed Standard
- IS-IS Routing with Reverse Metric
- Token
- Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-cbor-cddl
- Proposed Standard
- Concise data definition language (CDDL): a notational convention to express CBOR and JSON data structures
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Not OK
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format
- Proposed Standard
- C-DNS: A DNS Packet Capture Format
- Token
- Warren Kumari (OPS area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken
- Proposed Standard
- PASSporT SHAKEN Extension (SHAKEN)
- Token
- Adam Roach (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis
- Proposed Standard
- Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication Status
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.1.2 Returning items
(None)
2.2 Individual submissions
2.2.1 New items
(None)
2.2.2 Returning items
(None)
2.3 Status changes
2.3.1 New items
(None)
2.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3. Document actions
3.1 WG submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol
- Experimental
- Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) Protocol
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
3.1.2 Returning items
(None)
3.2 Individual submissions via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New items
(None)
3.2.2 Returning items
(None)
3.3 Status changes
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"
3.3.1 New items
(None)
3.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents
The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:
- The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
- The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
- The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
- The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
- The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.4.1 New items
(None)
3.4.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4.3 For action
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-irtf-t2trg-iot-seccons
IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-t2trg-iot-seccons - IRTF Informational
-
draft-irtf-t2trg-iot-seccons
State-of-the-Art and Challenges for the Internet of Things Security - Token
- Alissa Cooper
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-dolson-transport-middlebox
IETF conflict review for draft-dolson-transport-middlebox - ISE Informational
-
draft-dolson-transport-middlebox
An Inventory of Transport-centric Functions Provided by Middleboxes - Token
- Alissa Cooper
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile
IETF conflict review for draft-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile - ISE Informational
-
draft-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile
Commercial National Security Algorithm (CNSA) Suite Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile - Token
- Alissa Cooper
4. Working Group actions
4.1 WG creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review
(None)
4.1.2 Proposed for approval
(None)
4.2 WG rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review
- WG name
- Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-dmarc-(01-00)
- Area
- ART (Alexey Melnikov)
- WG name
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol (httpbis)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-httpbis-(07-01)
- Area
- ART (Alexey Melnikov)
4.2.2 Proposed for approval
- WG name
- Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange (mile)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-mile-(03-03)
- Area
- SEC (Alexey Melnikov)