IESG agenda: 2019-02-21
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll call
1.2 Bash the agenda
1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats
1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat
OUTSTANDING TASKS
Last updated: February 21, 2019
o Alvaro Retana to send email to the IESG with proposed re-labeling of
scheduling conflicts.
- Added 2018-12-06 (5 telechats ago)
o Suresh Krishnan to discuss naming experts for the registries created
by draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnxsemantics with Allison Mankin.
- Added 2019-01-10 (4 telechats ago)
o Ben Campbell to write up text on the IESG's expectations regarding
conflicts of interest and the disclosure of funding sources.
- Added 2019-01-17 (3 telechats ago)
o Warren Kumari and Spencer Dawkins to develop the spherical routing
topic.
- Added 2019-01-17 (3 telechats ago)
o Suresh Krishnan to draft a new proposed IESG Statement on the
procedure to reference material behind a paywall, that includes the
existing text and adds comments from the discussion, Eric Rescorla,
and Barry Leiba.
- Added 2019-01-31 (2 telechats ago)
o Roman Danyliw and Barry Leiba to identify and catalogue common
problematic and inappropriate behaviors from individuals in the IETF
community both at in-person meetings and on email lists.
- Added 2019-02-14 (1 telechats ago)
2. Protocol actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG submissions
2.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec
- Proposed Standard
- WebRTC Forward Error Correction Requirements
- Token
- Adam Roach (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet
- Proposed Standard
- Encrypted Key Transport for DTLS and Secure RTP
- Token
- Ben Campbell (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Not OK
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IPR
-
Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-detnet-architecture
- Proposed Standard
- Deterministic Networking Architecture
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb (Has RFC Editor Note)
- Proposed Standard
- A Lower Effort Per-Hop Behavior (LE PHB)
- Token
- Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-jmap-core
- Proposed Standard
- JSON Meta Application Protocol
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-jmap-mail
- Proposed Standard
- JMAP for Mail
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme
- Proposed Standard
- RTP Payload Format for Flexible Forward Error Correction (FEC)
- Token
- Ben Campbell (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IPR
-
Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme
2.1.2 Returning items
(None)
2.2 Individual submissions
2.2.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis
- Proposed Standard
- Well-Known Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.2.2 Returning items
(None)
2.3 Status changes
2.3.1 New items
(None)
2.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3. Document actions
3.1 WG submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility
- Informational
- On Demand Mobility Management
- Token
- Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dots-requirements
- Informational
- Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Open Threat Signaling Requirements
- Token
- Benjamin Kaduk (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Unknown
- Reviews
- IPR
-
Arbor Networks, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-dots-requirements
3.1.2 Returning items
(None)
3.2 Individual submissions via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New items
(None)
3.2.2 Returning items
(None)
3.3 Status changes
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"
3.3.1 New items
(None)
3.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents
The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:
- The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
- The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
- The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
- The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
- The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.4.1 New items
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile
IETF conflict review for draft-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile - ISE Informational
-
draft-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile
Commercial National Security Algorithm (CNSA) Suite Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile - Token
- Benjamin Kaduk
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-vandesompel-citeas
IETF conflict review for draft-vandesompel-citeas - ISE Informational
-
draft-vandesompel-citeas
cite-as: A Link Relation to Convey a Preferred URI for Referencing - Token
- Alexey Melnikov
3.4.2 Returning items
(None)
4. Working Group actions
4.1 WG creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review
(None)
4.1.2 Proposed for approval
(None)
4.2 WG rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review
(None)
4.2.2 Proposed for approval
(None)