IESG agenda: 2019-05-30
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll call
1.2 Bash the agenda
1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats
1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat
OUTSTANDING TASKS
Last updated: May 16, 2019
o Suresh Krishnan to discuss naming experts for the registries created
by draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnxsemantics with Colin Perkins.
- Added 2019-01-10 (9 telechats ago)
o Barry Leiba to write up text on the IESG's
expectations regarding conflicts of interest and the disclosure of
funding sources.
- Added 2019-01-17 (8 telechats ago)
o Ignas Bagdonas to propose an additional question on YANG Model
format validation for each of the styles of document write-ups.
- Added 2019-04-18 (2 telechats ago)
o Roman Danyliw to talk to the tools team to reset the counters on
substate change for documents in AD Evaluation.
- Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
o Roman Danyliw to draft text to be posted on ietf.org about reporting
protocol vulnerabilities via an email alias and possible procedures
on how to assign triage resources.
- Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
o Suresh Krishnan to write a document on replacing the "updates" with
new terminology (amends/amended by; extends/extended by; see also).
- Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
o Warren Kumari and Ted Hardie to write a document on Implementation
Target Sets (aka Living Documents).
- Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
o Roman Danyliw and Barry Leiba to draft a starting point for the
discussion on setting expectations with the WG Chairs in reference
to responses to inappropriate or unacceptable behaviors.
- Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
o Martin Vigoureux to work with the IESG to create a list of possible
IESG Tutorials and will prioritize them for scheduling on a series
of Informal Telechats.
- Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
o All IESG to coordinate with their co-ADs and send a list of specific
"hot topic" items that should be checked. The list to be provided
for document authors.
- Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
o Eric Vyncke to write up draft text for the NomCom to help them
understand the rules for the NomCom.
- Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
o Suresh Krishnan to write up a NomCom Chair BCP (work with past
chairs).
- Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
o Eric Vyncke to draft text for a more coherent BoF Proposal for
MEDIA OPS and add to the BoF Wiki.
- Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
o Roman Danyliw to shepherd the www.ietf.org analytics discussion
with the community.
- Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
o Warren Kumari, Alvaro Retana, and Mirja Kuehlewind with Spencer
Dawkins to continue discussion of the next Deep Dive topic for
IETF 105.
- Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
o Suresh Krishnan to update the text for material behind a paywall
to update the reference to section 7.1; update the document shepherd
writeup; and draft text for a possible IESG statement to circulate
with the WG Chairs.
- Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
o Alexey Melnikov, Warren Kumari, and Suresh Krishnan to work with the
authors of the recall draft on next steps.
- Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
o Alexey Melnikov to find designated experts for RFC-ietf-core-object-
security [IANA #1141664].
- Added 2019-05-01 (2 telechats ago)
o Alissa to report back on the discussion about the Meeting Room
Policy at LLC Board retreat.
- Added 2019-05-02 (2 telechats ago)
o Alvaro Retana to finalize the proposal for relabeling the IETF
Meeting Agenda Conflicts, and discuss the proposal with the WG
Chairs.
- Added 2019-05-02 (2 telechats ago)
o Alissa Cooper and Alexa Morris to put together cost effective places
for a second IESG retreat.
- Added 2019-05-16 (0 telechats ago)
2. Protocol actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG submissions
2.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang
- Proposed Standard
- A YANG Data Model for Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD)
- Token
- Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo
- Proposed Standard
- Using RPL Option Type, Routing Header for Source Routes and IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation in the RPL Data Plane
- Token
- Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-acme-caa
- Proposed Standard
- CAA Record Extensions for Account URI and ACME Method Binding
- Token
- Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions
- Proposed Standard
- Event Publishing Extensions to iCalendar
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis
- Proposed Standard
- DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record
- Token
- Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Not OK
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis
- Proposed Standard
- SDP: Session Description Protocol
- Token
- Adam Roach (ART area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-tsvwg-tinymt32
- Proposed Standard
- TinyMT32 Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG)
- Token
- Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.1.2 Returning items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-tsvwg-rlc-fec-scheme
- Proposed Standard
- Sliding Window Random Linear Code (RLC) Forward Erasure Correction (FEC) Schemes for FECFRAME
- Token
- Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.2 Individual submissions
2.2.1 New items
(None)
2.2.2 Returning items
(None)
2.3 Status changes
2.3.1 New items
(None)
2.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3. Document actions
3.1 WG submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn
- Informational
- Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension
- Token
- Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp
- Informational
- An Opportunistic Approach for Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (OSRTP)
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
3.1.2 Returning items
(None)
3.2 Individual submissions via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New items
(None)
3.2.2 Returning items
(None)
3.3 Status changes
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"
3.3.1 New items
(None)
3.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents
The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:
- The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
- The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
- The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
- The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
- The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.4.1 New items
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework
IETF conflict review for draft-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework - ISE Informational
-
draft-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework
Multiple Access Management Services - Token
- Suresh Krishnan
- IPR
-
Alcatel Lucent's Statement about IPR related to draft-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile
IETF conflict review for draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile - ISE Informational
-
draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile
Commercial National Security Algorithm (CNSA) Suite Profile of Certificate Management over CMS - Token
- Benjamin Kaduk
3.4.2 Returning items
(None)
4. Working Group actions
4.1 WG creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review
(None)
4.1.2 Proposed for approval
(None)
4.2 WG rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review
(None)
4.2.2 Proposed for approval
(None)