IESG agenda: 2016-08-04

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: July 28, 2016

  o Benoit Claise, Alvaro Retana, and Suresh Krishnan to propose charter 
    development recommendations.
    - Added 2016-06-16 (3 telechats ago)

  o Jari Arkko and the IESG to put together feedback questions regarding 
    the 10am meeting start, length of the meeting time, and potential 
    experiments with meeting formats (unconference, lounges, 1+lounge 
    time, etc.)
    - Added after IETF 96 (0 telechats ago)

  o Jari Arkko to find more scribes.
    - Added after IETF 96 (0 telechats ago)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-6man-multi-homed-host
Proposed Standard
Routing packets from hosts in a multi-prefix network
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Last call expires
2016-08-04

IETF stream
draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard
Proposed Standard
RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Independent Reporting of Burst/Gap Discard Metric
Token
Alissa Cooper (ART area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Last call expires
2016-08-01

IETF stream
draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive
Proposed Standard
Indicating Exclusive Support of RTP/RTCP Multiplexing using SDP
Token
Ben Campbell (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports
Proposed Standard
Transports for WebRTC
Token
Alissa Cooper (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Last call expires
2016-08-01

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket
Proposed Standard
The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)
Token
Ben Campbell (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-sweet-rfc2910bis
Proposed Standard
Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Encoding and Transport
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-sweet-rfc2911bis
Proposed Standard
Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf
Informational
Customizing DHCP Configuration on the Basis of Network Topology
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown

IETF stream
draft-ietf-grow-blackholing
Informational
BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing
Token
Joel Jaeggli (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request
Informational
Assignment of an Ethertype for IPv6 with LoWPAN Encapsulation
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-holmberg-dispatch-rfc7315-updates
Informational
Updates to Private Header (P-Header) Extension Usage in Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Requests/Responses
Token
Ben Campbell (NONE area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

(None)

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4.3 For action

Conflict review
conflict-review-behringer-ncrg-complexity-framework
IETF conflict review for draft-behringer-ncrg-complexity-framework
ISE Informational
draft-behringer-ncrg-complexity-framework
A Framework for Defining Network Complexity
Token
Jari Arkko

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

WG name
Security Automation and Continuous Monitoring (sacm)
Charter
charter-ietf-sacm-(01-00)
Area
SEC (Kathleen Moriarty)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 [IANA #918933] Designation of 2 additional port experts (Michelle Cotton)

6.2 Conflict Review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt (Stephen Farrell)

7. Working Group news