IESG agenda: 2019-05-30

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: May 16, 2019

  o Suresh Krishnan to discuss naming experts for the registries created 
    by draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnxsemantics with Colin Perkins.
    - Added 2019-01-10 (9 telechats ago)
  o Barry Leiba to write up text on the IESG's 
    expectations regarding conflicts of interest and the disclosure of 
    funding sources.
    - Added 2019-01-17 (8 telechats ago)
  o Ignas Bagdonas to propose an additional question on YANG Model 
    format validation for each of the styles of document write-ups.
    - Added 2019-04-18 (2 telechats ago)
  o Roman Danyliw to talk to the tools team to reset the counters on 
    substate change for documents in AD Evaluation.
    - Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
  o Roman Danyliw to draft text to be posted on ietf.org about reporting 
    protocol vulnerabilities via an email alias and possible procedures 
    on how to assign triage resources. 
    - Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
  o Suresh Krishnan to write a document on replacing the "updates" with 
    new terminology (amends/amended by; extends/extended by; see also).
    - Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
  o Warren Kumari and Ted Hardie to write a document on Implementation 
    Target Sets (aka Living Documents).
    - Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
  o Roman Danyliw and Barry Leiba to draft a starting point for the 
    discussion on setting expectations with the WG Chairs in reference 
    to responses to inappropriate or unacceptable behaviors. 
    - Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
  o Martin Vigoureux to work with the IESG to create a list of possible 
    IESG Tutorials and will prioritize them for scheduling on a series 
    of Informal Telechats. 
    - Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
  o All IESG to coordinate with their co-ADs and send a list of specific 
    "hot topic" items that should be checked. The list to be provided 
    for document authors.
    - Added 2019-04-24 (2 telechats ago)
  o Eric Vyncke to write up draft text for the NomCom to help them 
    understand the rules for the NomCom.
    - Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
  o Suresh Krishnan to write up a NomCom Chair BCP (work with past 
    chairs).
    - Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
  o Eric Vyncke to draft text for a more coherent BoF Proposal for 
    MEDIA OPS and add to the BoF Wiki.
    - Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
  o Roman Danyliw to shepherd the www.ietf.org analytics discussion 
    with the community.
    - Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
  o Warren Kumari, Alvaro Retana, and Mirja Kuehlewind with Spencer 
    Dawkins to continue discussion of the next Deep Dive topic for 
    IETF 105.
    - Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
  o Suresh Krishnan to update the text for material behind a paywall 
    to update the reference to section 7.1; update the document shepherd 
    writeup; and draft text for a possible IESG statement to circulate 
    with the WG Chairs. 
    - Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
  o Alexey Melnikov, Warren Kumari, and Suresh Krishnan to work with the 
    authors of the recall draft on next steps. 
    - Added 2019-04-25 (2 telechats ago)
  o Alexey Melnikov to find designated experts for RFC-ietf-core-object-
    security [IANA #1141664].
    - Added 2019-05-01 (2 telechats ago)
  o Alissa to report back on the discussion about the Meeting Room 
    Policy at LLC Board retreat.
    - Added 2019-05-02 (2 telechats ago)
  o Alvaro Retana to finalize the proposal for relabeling the IETF 
    Meeting Agenda Conflicts, and discuss the proposal with the WG 
    Chairs.
    - Added 2019-05-02 (2 telechats ago)
  o Alissa Cooper and Alexa Morris to put together cost effective places 
    for a second IESG retreat.
    - Added 2019-05-16 (0 telechats ago)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang
Proposed Standard
A YANG Data Model for Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD)
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo
Proposed Standard
Using RPL Option Type, Routing Header for Source Routes and IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation in the RPL Data Plane
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-acme-caa
Proposed Standard
CAA Record Extensions for Account URI and ACME Method Binding
Token
Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions
Proposed Standard
Event Publishing Extensions to iCalendar
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis
Proposed Standard
DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record
Token
Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis
Proposed Standard
SDP: Session Description Protocol
Token
Adam Roach (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tsvwg-tinymt32
Proposed Standard
TinyMT32 Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG)
Token
Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.1.2 Returning items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tsvwg-rlc-fec-scheme
Proposed Standard
Sliding Window Random Linear Code (RLC) Forward Erasure Correction (FEC) Schemes for FECFRAME
Token
Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn
Informational
Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension
Token
Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp
Informational
An Opportunistic Approach for Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (OSRTP)
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

(None)

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

Conflict review
conflict-review-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework
IETF conflict review for draft-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework
ISE Informational
draft-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework
Multiple Access Management Services
Token
Suresh Krishnan
IPR
Alcatel Lucent's Statement about IPR related to draft-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework

Conflict review
conflict-review-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile
IETF conflict review for draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile
ISE Informational
draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile
Commercial National Security Algorithm (CNSA) Suite Profile of Certificate Management over CMS
Token
Benjamin Kaduk

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 [IANA #1143383] Management Item: Acceptance of media type registration from standards organization National Center for Geospatial Intelligence Standards (NCGIS) (IANA)

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)