IESG agenda
2022-06-02
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll call
1.2 Bash the agenda
1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats
1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat
OUTSTANDING TASKS
Last updated: May 16, 2022
* DESIGNATED EXPERTS NEEDED
o Roman Danyliw to find designated experts for RFC 8809 (WebAuthn)
[IANA #1229681].
- Added 2022-04-19 (3 telechats ago)
o Security ADs to find designated experts for RFC 9116 (A File Format
to Aid in Security Vulnerability Disclosure) [IANA #1230049].
- Added 2022-04-28 (2 telechats ago)
o Eric Vyncke to find designated experts for RFC 9250, "DNS over
Dedicated QUIC Connections" [IANA #1230687].
- Added 2022-05-16 (0 telechats ago)
* OPEN ACTION ITEMS
o Robert Wilton, Alvaro Retana, and Warren Kumari to report back to
the IESG on the impact of COVID-19 to the IETF in July 2022.
- On hold; added 2021-06-10 (21 telechats ago)
o Murray Kucherawy to look into updating the guidance in BCP 13 on
when to add organizations to the "Standards-related organizations
that have registered Media Types in the Standards Tree" list.
- Added 2021-12-16 (10 telechats ago)
o Lars Eggert to facilitate an update of the document shepherd writeup
form.
- Added 2022-05-12 (1 telechat ago)
o Lars Eggert to ask the Tools Team to push the global whitelist out
to WG mailing lists again.
- Added 2022-05-12 (1 telechat ago)
2. Protocol actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG submissions
2.1.1 New items
2.1.2 Returning items
(None)
2.2 Individual submissions
2.2.1 New items
(None)
2.2.2 Returning items
(None)
2.3 Status changes
2.3.1 New items
(None)
2.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3. Document actions
3.1 WG submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New items
(None)
3.1.2 Returning items
(None)
3.2 Individual submissions via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New items
3.2.2 Returning items
(None)
3.3 Status changes
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"
3.3.1 New items
(None)
3.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents
The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:
- The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
- The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
- The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
- The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
- The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.4.1 New items
(None)
3.4.2 Returning items
(None)
4. Working Group actions
4.1 WG creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review
(None)
4.1.2 Proposed for approval
(None)
4.2 WG rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review
(None)