IESG agenda: 2017-08-03
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll call
1.2 Bash the agenda
1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats
1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat
OUTSTANDING TASKS
Last updated: July 6, 2017
o Suresh Krishnan to find designated experts for RFC-kivinen-802-15-ie
[IANA #953569].
- Added 2017-05-11 (5 telechats ago)
o Suresh Krishnan to find designated experts for RFC-ietf-dmm-lma-
controlled-mag-params [IANA #965520].
- Added 2017-06-08 (3 telechats ago)
o Spencer Dawkins to put together draft on IAOC Nomcom interactions.
- Added 2017-07-05 (1 telechat ago)
2. Protocol actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG submissions
2.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming
- Proposed Standard
- MAG Multipath Binding Option
- Token
- Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation
- Proposed Standard
- Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): MTU Negotiation
- Token
- Alia Atlas (RTG area)
- Deferred by
- Spencer Dawkins on 2017-07-05
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute
- Proposed Standard
- Updates to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-pce-pceps
- Proposed Standard
- Secure Transport for PCEP
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi
- Proposed Standard
- Generalized Interface Switching Capability Descriptor - Switching Capability Specific Information
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis
- Proposed Standard
- Using BGP to Bind MPLS Labels to Address Prefixes
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition
- Proposed Standard
- Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace Registration Transition
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.1.2 Returning items
(None)
2.2 Individual submissions
2.2.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-nottingham-rfc5988bis
- Proposed Standard
- Web Linking
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk
- Proposed Standard
- Well-known URIs for the WebSocket Protocol
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-turner-est-extensions
- Proposed Standard
- EST Extensions
- Token
- Kathleen Moriarty (NONE area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Not OK
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.2.2 Returning items
(None)
2.3 Status changes
2.3.1 New items
(None)
2.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3. Document actions
3.1 WG submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics
- Experimental
- Model Based Metrics for Bulk Transport Capacity
- Token
- Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints
- Experimental
- An HTTP Status Code for Indicating Hints
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
3.1.2 Returning items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp
- Informational
- The ARIA Algorithm and Its Use with the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol(SRTP)
- Token
- Ben Campbell (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Unknown
- Reviews
3.2 Individual submissions via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New items
(None)
3.2.2 Returning items
(None)
3.3 Status changes
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"
3.3.1 New items
(None)
3.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents
The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:
- The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
- The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
- The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
- The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
- The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.4.1 New items
(None)
3.4.2 Returning items
(None)
4. Working Group actions
4.1 WG creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review
- WG name
- Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend (extra)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-extra-(00-01)
- Area
- ART (Alexey Melnikov)
4.1.2 Proposed for approval
(None)
4.2 WG rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review
- WG name
- DKIM Crypto Update (dcrup)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-dcrup-(01-00)
- Area
- ART (Alexey Melnikov)
4.2.2 Proposed for approval
(None)