Updating the IANA MPLS LSP Ping Parameters
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-11

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (mpls WG)
Authors Loa Andersson  , Mach Chen  , Carlos Pignataro  , Tarek Saad 
Last updated 2021-03-01
Replaces draft-andersson-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Proposed Standard
Formats plain text pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Reviews
Additional Resources
- IPR poll
- Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Document shepherd Adrian Farrel
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2020-12-05)
IESG IESG state IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
Action Holders
(None)
Consensus Boilerplate Yes
Telechat date
Has enough positions to pass.
Responsible AD Deborah Brungard
Send notices to Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
IANA IANA review state Version Changed - Review Needed
MPLS Working Group                                          L. Andersson
Internet-Draft                                  Bronze Dragon Consulting
Updates: 8029, 8611 (if approved)                                M. Chen
Intended status: Standards Track                     Huawei Technologies
Expires: September 1, 2021                                  C. Pignataro
                                                           Cisco Systems
                                                                 T. Saad
                                                        Juniper Networks
                                                       February 28, 2021

               Updating the IANA MPLS LSP Ping Parameters
             draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-11

Abstract

   This document updates RFC 8029 and RFC 8611 which both define IANA
   registries for MPLS Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping, in particular the
   registration procedure "Private Use" (esarlier know as "Vendor
   Private Use") is changed to "First Come, First Served" the TLV and
   Sub-TLV Registries.

   It also updates the description of the procedures for the responses
   sent when an unknown or erroneous code point is found.  The updates
   are to clarify and align this namespace with recent developments,
   e.g. the updates to " Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations
   Section in RFCs" (e.g.  RFC 8126), instead of the terminology from
   the obsoleted RFC 5226.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on September 1, 2021.

Andersson, et al.       Expires September 1, 2021               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries             February 2021

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.1.  Requirement Language  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     1.2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
       1.2.1.  Terminology Used in this Document . . . . . . . . . .   5
       1.2.2.  Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   2.  Updating the Message Types, Reply Mode and Return Codes
       Registries  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   3.  Updating the TLV and Sub-TLV Registries . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.1.  General Principles for the LSP Ping TLV and Sub-TLV
           registries  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       3.1.1.  Unrecognized Experimental Use TLVs and Sub-TLVs . . .   7
     3.2.  Common Registration Procedures for TLVs and sub-TLVs  . .   8
     3.3.  Changes to the LSP Ping Registries  . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       3.3.1.  Common Changes to the TLV and Sub-TLV Registries  . .   9
   4.  Updates to Related RFCs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     4.1.  Updates to RFC 8029 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     4.2.  Updates to RFC 8611 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     6.1.  Updates to the Message Type, Reply Mode and Return Codes
           Registries  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
       6.1.1.  Updates to the Message Type registry  . . . . . . . .  13
       6.1.2.  Updates to the Reply Modes registry . . . . . . . . .  14
       6.1.3.  Updates to the Return Codes registry  . . . . . . . .  16
     6.2.  Updates to the TLV and Sub-TLV registries . . . . . . . .  18
       6.2.1.  Updates to the TLVs registry  . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
       6.2.2.  Updates to the registry for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 1, 16
Show full document text