# Document Shepherd Write-Up for draft-ietf-nfsv4-delstid-03
## Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org>
## 26-Aug-2023
### 1
This is the second version of submitting this document. I believe that the
WG had consensus previously, but this second round has improved the document
even more and achieved even stronger consensus, including work with the RFC
editor on certain wording.
### 2
Only a nit on if this draft updated and RFC or extended it; that is
resolved.
### 3
No.
### 4
Yes, there is sufficient implementation existence; significantly for NFSv4,
this has been expiremented with in the Linux client (the largest market
share client). The write up includes expirence and information gained from
implementation testing.
## Additional Reviews
### 5
No.
### 6
Not applicable; although maybe there should be XDR review / test for NFS.
### 7
Not applicable.
### 8
Not applicable.
## Document Shepherd Checks
### 9
Yes.
### 10
No areas of expert review apply to this draft.
### 11
This draft is for Proposed Standard and it is the appropriate track since
this document is an extension to an existing standards track RFC.
### 12
Yes. Intellectual property statements are properly collected and stated in
the draft.
### 13
Yes.
### 14
No nits exist. The tool runs clean and the reviews detailed review of
wording choice and phrasing.
### 15
Possibly, I've never had experience references to the Legal Provisions from
the IETF Trust. That is listed as Informative, which I personally think is
appropriate, but I would defer to additional guidance.
### 16
Not applicable.
### 17
No downrefs.
### 18
Only published RFCs are referenced.
### 19
No.
### 20
This does not create and IANA considerations as stated in the document.
### 21
Not applicable.