Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Unhandled Namespaces
draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-08
Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (regext WG) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | James Gould , Martin Casanova | |||
Last updated | 2021-03-02 (latest revision 2021-02-19) | |||
Replaces | draft-gould-casanova-regext-unhandled-namespaces | |||
Stream | IETF | |||
Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | |||
Formats | plain text html xml pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex | |||
Reviews | ||||
Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication (wg milestone: Jul 2020 - Submit for publicati... ) | ||
Document shepherd | David Smith | |||
Shepherd write-up | Show (last changed 2021-01-22) | |||
IESG | IESG state | RFC Ed Queue | ||
Action Holders |
(None)
|
|||
Consensus Boilerplate | Yes | |||
Telechat date | ||||
Responsible AD | Barry Leiba | |||
Send notices to | David Smith <dsmith@verisign.com> | |||
IANA | IANA review state | IANA OK - Actions Needed | ||
IANA action state | RFC-Ed-Ack | |||
IANA expert review state | Reviews assigned | |||
RFC Editor | RFC Editor state | EDIT | ||
Details |
Network Working Group J. Gould Internet-Draft VeriSign, Inc. Intended status: Standards Track M. Casanova Expires: 23 August 2021 SWITCH 19 February 2021 Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Unhandled Namespaces draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-08 Abstract The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP), as defined in RFC 5730, includes a method for the client and server to determine the objects to be managed during a session and the object extensions to be used during a session. The services are identified using namespace URIs, and an "unhandled namespace" is one that is associated with a service not supported by the client. This document defines an operational practice that enables the server to return information associated with unhandled namespace URIs that is compliant with the negotiated services defined in RFC 5730. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 23 August 2021. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights Gould & Casanova Expires 23 August 2021 [Page 1] Internet-Draft unhandledNamespaces February 2021 and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Unhandled Namespaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Use of EPP <extValue> for Unhandled Namespace Data . . . . . 4 3.1. Unhandled Object-Level Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2. Unhandled Command-Response Extension . . . . . . . . . . 7 4. Signaling Client and Server Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5. Usage with General EPP Responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6. Usage with Poll Message EPP Responses . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 7. Implementation Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7.1. Client Implementation Considerations . . . . . . . . . . 16 7.2. Server Implementation Considerations . . . . . . . . . . 16 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 8.1. XML Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 8.2. EPP Extension Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 9. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 9.1. Verisign EPP SDK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 9.2. SWITCH Automated DNSSEC Provisioning Process . . . . . . 18 10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 11. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Appendix A. Change History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 A.1. Change from 00 to 01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 A.2. Change from 01 to 02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A.3. Change from 02 to REGEXT 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A.4. Change from REGEXT 00 to REGEXT 01 . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A.5. Change from REGEXT 01 to REGEXT 02 . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A.6. Change from REGEXT 02 to REGEXT 03 . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A.7. Change from REGEXT 03 to REGEXT 04 . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A.8. Change from REGEXT 04 to REGEXT 05 . . . . . . . . . . . 22Show full document text