Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-18
review-ietf-asdf-sdf-18-secdir-lc-nystrom-2024-05-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-asdf-sdf
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 25)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-05-22
Requested 2024-05-08
Authors Michael Koster , Carsten Bormann , Ari Keränen
I-D last updated 2025-10-13 (Latest revision 2025-10-13)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -18 by Mallory Knodel (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Magnus Nyström (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -18 by Harald T. Alvestrand (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Susan Hares (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -21 by Christian Amsüss (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -20 by Susan Hares (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -20 by Magnus Nyström (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Magnus Nyström
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-asdf-sdf by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/EN-3aP5-qGr8wzpc7g-_ETOlIFs
Reviewed revision 18 (document currently at 25)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-05-27
review-ietf-asdf-sdf-18-secdir-lc-nystrom-2024-05-27-00
I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing effort
to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were
written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area Directors.  Document
authors, document editors, and WG chairs should treat these comments just like
any other IETF Last Call comments.

This document specifies a format for use in the "creation and maintenance of
data and interaction models that describe [physical things possible to connect
to]. The Security Considerations section is well written, I have only a couple
of questions:

- The Security Considerations section mentions the possible need for
confidentiality of an SDF model ("There may be confidentiality requirements on
SDF models, both on their content and on the fact that a specific model is used
in a particular Thing or environment"). Couldn't there also be a need for
integrity/authenticity of a given SDF model? The document is silent on this. -
Related to the previous point, was it ever discussed to allow for an integrity
or authenticity value accompanying or being part of an SDFThing instance?