Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
review-ietf-httpbis-cache-16-opsdir-lc-morton-2021-06-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-httpbis-cache |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 19) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2021-06-10 | |
| Requested | 2021-05-27 | |
| Authors | Roy T. Fielding , Mark Nottingham , Julian Reschke | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-11-09 (Latest revision 2021-09-12) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -16
by Derek Atkins
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -16 by Mohit Sethi (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -16 by Al Morton (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Al Morton |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/17NFUWkhSEhcMPwri0x0AiSvxfM | |
| Reviewed revision | 16 (document currently at 19) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2021-06-06 |
review-ietf-httpbis-cache-16-opsdir-lc-morton-2021-06-06-00
Since this review was requested with a very short deadline, it only allows for a "surgical" response. This draft obsoletes RFC 7234, and Appendix B lists the changes from RFC 7234. Assuming this list is complete and correct, all of the changes appear to improve the situation from an operational perspective, so it's good to go. Nit: == Unused Reference: 'RFC7234' is defined on line 1766, but no explicit reference was found in the text Thanks to the authors for taking-up this work; several years and many revisions were involved to reach this point.