Skip to main content

Agenda IETF97: banana
agenda-97-banana-01

Meeting Agenda BANdwidth Aggregation for interNet Access (banana) WG
Date and time 2016-11-17 04:30
Title Agenda IETF97: banana
State Active
Other versions plain text
Last updated 2016-11-02

agenda-97-banana-01
BANdwidth Aggregation for interNet Access (BANANA) BOF
IETF 97, Seoul, South Korea
Thursday Afternoon Session I (13:30 - 15:00)


Chairs:
Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>

Responsible AD:
Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>

Mailing List:
  Discussion:   banana@ietf.org
  To Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana
  Archive:      https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/


BOF Description: 
This BOF will discuss how we can take advantage of multiple access
links, provided by one or more access providers, in cases where end
nodes and applications may not be multi-access-aware.  Use of multiple
access links could provide bandwidth aggregation when multiple links
are available (i.e. improved performance), and session continuation
when a link becomes unavailable (i.e. increased reliability).

Solutions to this problem are intended to apply to home and
small-office networks, so solutions must support load-sharing of a
small number of flows (in some cases only one) over multiple paths,
recombining the traffic in ways that do not cause problems for the
network (i.e. congestion, multi-level retransmission, etc.) or for
upper-layer protocols (i.e. packet reordering within flows).
Solutions in this area must allow for some traffic to bypass bandwidth
aggregation (e.g. for flows that are mandated to travel a specific
path, or for flows that are already using a more end-to-end bandwidth
aggregation solution).  Solutions should provide minimal (if any)
performance degradation when multiple links are not available, or when
one or more of the links is not performing sufficiently to support
increased performance to the end nodes.

This is a Non-WG-forming BOF.  The purposes of the BOF are to discuss
the problem space, and determine if there is sufficient interest and
energy in the IETF to pursue any work in this area.  If the interest
and energy exist, further effort may be exerted to scope and charter
an IETF WG.

For more information about the BANANA BOF, see the BOF Wiki at: 
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart

- Agenda:
0) Administrivia (5 mins)
1) BOF Scope and Problem Description (Chairs, 10 min)
2) BANANA Solution Space & Experiences
   - GRE Tunnel Bonding
     	  - Solution Overview (Mingui Zhang, 5 min)
	   - Deployment Experience (Nicolai Leymann, 5 min)
   - MPTCP Proxy (??, 10 min)
   - Others?
3) Related Research
   - Multipath Bonding at Layer 3 (Brian Trammel, 10 min)
4) Related Work in Other SDOs
   - Broadband Forum TR-348 (Dave Allan, 5 mins)
   - Others?
5) Open Discussion (30 mins)
6) Questions & Next Steps (Chairs & ADs, 10 mins)

- Relevant drafts/documents:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-banana-problem-statement 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mrc-banana-considerations 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-mptcp-plain-mode
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peirens-mptcp-transparent
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-02
https://www.ietf.org/staging/draft-muley-bonding-solution-hybrid-access-00.txt
https://irtf.org/anrw/2016/anrw16-final21.pdf
https://www.broadband-forum.org/technical/download/TR-348.pdf