Deterministic Networking
charter-ietf-detnet-04
Yes
No Objection
Jim Guichard
Roman Danyliw
(Andrew Alston)
(Erik Kline)
(Francesca Palombini)
(Martin Duke)
(Murray Kucherawy)
(Paul Wouters)
- Ready for external review (00-00)
- Approve (00-01)
- Ready w/o external review (01-00)
- Ready for external review (02-01)
- Ready w/o external review (03-00)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment
(2023-11-30 for -03-00)
Sent
I have reviewed the changes to the current charter: they do make sense. Alas, neither the current charter nor the revised one mention the intended status of the documents (they are only specified in the separate milestones). Most of the work items are "will document" and corresponding milestones of "informational" *EXCEPT* for the data plane one as it is both "will document" and "standards track", i.e., a contradiction. May I suggest to change the "will document" into "will specify" for the data plane work item ?
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
John Scudder Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2023-11-27 for -03-00)
Not sent
To recap comments I made earlier in a different forum, I see this recharter effort as neither more nor less than the merger of two previously chartered WGs (RAW, now closed, is the other one) without any net increase in chartered work, but rather a net decrease in number of WGs to juggle. In my view, this recharter doesn’t actually expand the scope of the WG, since the approved charter doesn’t restrict detnet from working on any particular media, including wireless. So, I think this only adds precision and transparency, and doesn’t reflect formal scope creep. That was my rationale for adding it to the agenda as a minor recharter.
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03-00)
Not sent
Erik Kline Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03-00)
Not sent
Francesca Palombini Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03-00)
Not sent
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03-00)
Not sent
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03-01)
Not sent
Paul Wouters Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03-00)
Not sent
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2023-11-28 for -03-00)
Sent
In the block of text describing the coverage of wireless, would it be helpful for the charter to explicitly mention that it is picking up this work from the RAW WG? I'm not sure that this comment will be useful longer term, but possible may be helpful for the next few years?
Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2023-11-28 for -03-00)
Sent
This looks good to me. Even though TSVWG is mentioned in the charter, I was think as DETNET working group will touch on packet loss, delay and recovery which is very close to congestion control we do, it might be good to mention CCWG in this charter for potential collaboration. CCWG hosts good expertise on delay and loss related questions.